DOCSLIB.ORG

Secondary Predication in Polish By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Secondary Predication in Polish By Secondary Predication in Polish By Malgorzata Szajbel-Keck A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Johanna Nichols, Chair Professor Darya Kavitskaya Professor Line Mikkelsen Fall 2015 Abstract Secondary Predication in Polish by Malgorzata Szajbel-Keck Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Berkeley Professor Johanna Nichols, Chair This thesis explains how secondary predication is constructed. It focuses on Polish, with some comparisons to other languages, and provides analysis on the syntactic, morphological and semantic level in the paradigm of Minimalism. It starts with a definition of primary and secondary predication, maintaining that only adjuncts are true secondary predicates. This is followed by an introduction of a new phrase type, bipartite, to Polish linguistics – an expression consisting of a preposition and adjective or, sometimes, a noun. It is shown that bipartites are not simply adverbs, for which they have been taken so far, but they can serve in a variety of functions, some of them typical for adjectives, such as attributive modifier or predicative use. That predicative use, especially in secondary predication, is then in the focus of the rest of this work. The morphosyntactic composition of secondary predication is discussed in detail, showing that lexically secondary predicates involve both adjectives and nouns (to a much lesser extent). Structurally, secondary predicates are divided into bare ones, consisting of an adjective or noun, and prepositional ones, involving bipartites, and thus consisting of a combination of a preposition and adjective or noun. Semantically, secondary predicates can be depictive or resultative. It is also illustrated that although secondary predicates fall into the category of adjuncts, they must be clearly distinguished from adverbials, attributives, interjections and absolutes. The second part of this study concentrates on the syntax of secondary predication. It shows that secondary predicates are best described as small clauses with a predicator serving as Pr head. Three attachment sites are proposed that allow for unambiguous subject and object control, as well as separation of depictives and resultatives from circumstantials. Secondary predicates can both agree and not agree with controlling NPs. Cases are discussed where agreement is obligatory, optional or blocked. In order to account for this variety, two types of Pr head (small clause head) are assumed: the full one blocks agreement and may assign its own case, the defective one allows agreement. The agreement involves both Agree and feature sharing between the controlling NP and secondary predicate. Finally, long distance control of secondary predicates in non-finite constructions and verbal nouns is explained. 1 Additional to dichotomy depictive vs. resultative, a third group, the co-called circumstantials, is identified which differs significantly from the former ones not only in semantics, but also in lexical composition (they are predominantly nominal) and attachment site (inside NP). Keywords: secondary predication, adjective, bipartite, Polish, syntax, small clause, predicator, depictive, resultative 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ iv Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... v 0. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 0.1. Methodology ........................................................................................................ 5 0.2. Sources of data ..................................................................................................... 5 0.3. What is secondary predication? ............................................................................ 9 0.4. Bipartites ............................................................................................................ 12 0.4.1. Functions ......................................................................................................14 0.4.2. Structure .......................................................................................................18 0.4.3. Derivation ....................................................................................................20 0.4.4. Word or a phrase? ........................................................................................22 0.5. Structure of the dissertation ................................................................................ 24 1. Typology of secondary predication ........................................................................... 26 1.1. Lexical composition ........................................................................................... 26 1.1.1. Nouns ...........................................................................................................26 1.1.2. Adjectives ....................................................................................................30 1.2. Structural composition ....................................................................................... 30 1.2.1. Bare secondary predicates ............................................................................31 1.2.2. Prepositional secondary predicates ..............................................................34 1.3. Semantic composition ........................................................................................ 36 1.3.1. Depictives ....................................................................................................36 1.3.2. Resultatives ..................................................................................................38 1.3.3. Distinguishing between depictives and resultatives ....................................42 1.3.4. Circumstantials ............................................................................................43 1.4. Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 48 2. Structural properties .................................................................................................. 49 2.1. Secondary predicates as adjuncts ....................................................................... 49 2.2. Distinguishing secondary predicates from other sentence parts ........................ 52 2.2.1. Adverbial adjuncts .......................................................................................52 i 2.2.2. Attributives ..................................................................................................54 2.2.3. Interjections and absolute construction ........................................................57 2.3. Modifiers of secondary predicates ..................................................................... 58 2.4. Relation with the controlling NP ........................................................................ 61 2.4.1. Gradation of the controlling capacities ........................................................62 2.4.2. Controllers embedded in a PP ......................................................................64 2.4.3. Bare secondary predicates in finite clauses .................................................65 2.4.3.1. Subject controller ................................................................................. 67 2.4.3.2. Object controller .................................................................................. 69 2.4.4. Bare secondary predicates in non-finite clauses ..........................................72 2.4.4.1. Local control ........................................................................................ 72 2.4.4.2. Non-local control ................................................................................. 74 2.4.5. Prepositional secondary predicates ..............................................................77 2.5. Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 79 3. Syntax ........................................................................................................................ 80 3.1. Theoretical background ...................................................................................... 81 3.2. Small clauses ...................................................................................................... 81 3.3. Small clause adjuncts vs. small clause complements ......................................... 84 3.4. Pr head and predicators ...................................................................................... 88 3.5. Attachment site ................................................................................................... 91 3.5.1. Depictives and resultatives ..........................................................................91 3.5.2. Circumstantials ............................................................................................95 3.6. Subject of PrP ..................................................................................................... 97 3.7. Case marking and φ-feature sharing ...............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Noun Group and Verb Group Identification for Hindi
    Noun Group and Verb Group Identification for Hindi Smriti Singh1, Om P. Damani2, Vaijayanthi M. Sarma2 (1) Insideview Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad (2) Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT We present algorithms for identifying Hindi Noun Groups and Verb Groups in a given text by using morphotactical constraints and sequencing that apply to the constituents of these groups. We provide a detailed repertoire of the grammatical categories and their markers and an account of their arrangement. The main motivation behind this work on word group identification is to improve the Hindi POS Tagger’s performance by including strictly contextual rules. Our experiments show that the introduction of group identification rules results in improved accuracy of the tagger and in the resolution of several POS ambiguities. The analysis and implementation methods discussed here can be applied straightforwardly to other Indian languages. The linguistic features exploited here are drawn from a range of well-understood grammatical features and are not peculiar to Hindi alone. KEYWORDS : POS tagging, chunking, noun group, verb group. Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical Papers, pages 2491–2506, COLING 2012, Mumbai, December 2012. 2491 1 Introduction Chunking (local word grouping) is often employed to reduce the computational effort at the level of parsing by assigning partial structure to a sentence. A typical chunk, as defined by Abney (1994:257) consists of a single content word surrounded by a constellation of function words, matching a fixed template. Chunks, in computational terms are considered the truncated versions of typical phrase-structure grammar phrases that do not include arguments or adjuncts (Grover and Tobin 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Bilingual Complex Verbs: So What’S New About Them? Author(S): Tridha Chatterjee Proceedings of the 38Th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (2014), Pp
    Bilingual Complex Verbs: So what’s new about them? Author(s): Tridha Chatterjee Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (2014), pp. 47-62 General Session and Thematic Session on Language Contact Editors: Kayla Carpenter, Oana David, Florian Lionnet, Christine Sheil, Tammy Stark, Vivian Wauters Please contact BLS regarding any further use of this work. BLS retains copyright for both print and screen forms of the publication. BLS may be contacted via http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/bls/ . The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society is published online via eLanguage , the Linguistic Society of America's digital publishing platform. Bilingual Complex Verbs: So what’s new about them?1 TRIDHA CHATTERJEE University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Introduction In this paper I describe bilingual complex verb constructions in Bengali-English bilingual speech. Bilingual complex verbs have been shown to consist of two parts, the first element being either a verbal or nominal element from the non- native language of the bilingual speaker and the second element being a helping verb or dummy verb from the native language of the bilingual speaker. The verbal or nominal element from the non-native language provides semantics to the construction and the helping verb of the native language bears inflections of tense, person, number, aspect (Romaine 1986, Muysken 2000, Backus 1996, Annamalai 1971, 1989). I describe a type of Bengali-English bilingual complex verb which is different from the bilingual complex verbs that have been shown to occur in other codeswitched Indian varieties. I show that besides having a two-word complex verb, as has been shown in the literature so far, bilingual complex verbs of Bengali-English also have a three-part construction where the third element is a verb that adds to the meaning of these constructions and affects their aktionsart (aspectual properties).
    [Show full text]
  • Palatalization Processes in Kashubian from the Perspective of Lexical Phonology and Optimality Theory
    Palatalization processes in Kashubian from the perspective of Lexical Phonology and Optimality Theory Justyna Kosecka Praca doktorska wykonana w Instytucie Anglistyki Wydziału Neofilologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego pod kierunkiem prof. zw. dr. hab. Jerzego Rubacha Warszawa 2020 Palatalization processes in Kashubian from the perspective of Lexical Phonology and Optimality Theory Justyna Kosecka A dissertation submitted to the Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics Thesis supervisor: Professor Jerzy Rubach Warszawa 2020 Preface This dissertation examines palatalization processes of the North-Slavic language, Kashubian, spoken in East Pomerania, in Northern Poland. The investigation of the processes is framed in the theoretical context of three generative phonological theories: Lexical Phonology, Optimality Theory, and Derivational Optimality Theory. The primary goal of this dissertation is to test the operation of the theoretical frameworks on the material from Kashubian. The dissertation also aims at analysing palatalization processes active in Kashubian, especially those applying to coronals and velars. The third aim of this dissertation is to take part in the long-standing debate on the status of the vowel [ɨ] in Slavic languages, namely, whether [ɨ] is an allophone of /i/ or whether it constitutes a separate phoneme. This dissertation is organised as follows. Chapter 1 presents the goals of the dissertation and gives a general introduction to the frameworks of Lexical Phonology and Optimality Theory, to be used throughout the dissertation. Chapter 2 provides the basic facts regarding the Kashubian consonants and vowels that are relevant from the point of view of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Katarzyna DZIUBALSKA-KOŁACZYK and 1 Bogdan WALCZAK ( )
    Polish Katarzyna DZIUBALSKA-KOŁACZYK and 1 Bogdan WALCZAK ( ) 1. The identity 1.1. The name In the 10th century, individual West Slavic languages were differentiated from the western group, Polish among others. The name of the language comes from the name of a tribe of Polans (Polanie) who inhabited the midlands of the river Warta around Gniezno and Poznań, and whose tribal state later became the germ of the Polish state. Etymologically, Polanie means ‘the inhabitants of fields’. The Latin sources provide also other forms of the word: Polanii, Polonii, Poloni (at the turn of the 10th and 11th century king Bolesław Chrobry was referred to as dux Poloniorum in The Life of St. Adalbert [Żywot św. Wojciecha]) (cf. Klemensiewicz : 1961-1972). 1.2. The family affiliation 1.2.1. Origin The Polish language is most closely related to the extinct Polabian- Pomeranian dialects (whose only live representative is Kashubian) and together with them is classified by Slavicists into the West Lechitic subgroup of the Slavic languages. It is less closely related to the remaining West Slavic languages, i.e. Slovak, Czech and High- and Low Sorbian, and still less closely to the East and (1) Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (School of English at Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań) is Professor of English linguistics and Head of the School. She has published extensively on phonology and phonetics, first and second language acquisition and morphology, in all the areas emphasizing the contrastive aspect (especially with Polish, but also other languages, e.g. German, Italian). She has taught Polish linguistics at the University of Vienna.
    [Show full text]
  • English for Practical Purposes 9
    ENGLISH FOR PRACTICAL PURPOSES 9 CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction of English Grammar Chapter 2: Sentence Chapter 3: Noun Chapter 4: Verb Chapter 5: Pronoun Chapter 6: Adjective Chapter 7: Adverb Chapter 8: Preposition Chapter 9: Conjunction Chapter 10: Punctuation Chapter 11: Tenses Chapter 12: Voice Chapter 1 Introduction to English grammar English grammar is the body of rules that describe the structure of expressions in the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses and sentences. There are historical, social, and regional variations of English. Divergences from the grammardescribed here occur in some dialects of English. This article describes a generalized present-dayStandard English, the form of speech found in types of public discourse including broadcasting,education, entertainment, government, and news reporting, including both formal and informal speech. There are certain differences in grammar between the standard forms of British English, American English and Australian English, although these are inconspicuous compared with the lexical andpronunciation differences. Word classes and phrases There are eight word classes, or parts of speech, that are distinguished in English: nouns, determiners, pronouns, verbs, adjectives,adverbs, prepositions, and conjunctions. (Determiners, traditionally classified along with adjectives, have not always been regarded as a separate part of speech.) Interjections are another word class, but these are not described here as they do not form part of theclause and sentence structure of the language. Nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs form open classes – word classes that readily accept new members, such as the nouncelebutante (a celebrity who frequents the fashion circles), similar relatively new words. The others are regarded as closed classes.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Alternations in Inflection of Polish Masculine Inanimate Nouns in the Singular: a Pilot Study
    Investigationes Linguisticae, vol. Pozna IX, Current Alternations in Inflection of Polish Masculine Inanimate Nouns in the Singular: A Pilot Study Hanna Mausch ¢ , April 2003 Institute of Linguistics, Adam Mickiewicz University ul. Mi dzychodzka 5, 60-371 Pozna ¡ , POLAND [email protected] Abstract This paper discusses current use of genitive and accusative case forms of common nouns borrowed from English that are increasingly present in Polish and identified as masculine inanimate by virtue of their consonantal offsets in the nominative singular (bare forms). * In the first part, an overview of approved usage is presented. That is, a survey the assignment of nouns to various inflectional patterns based on works of three acclaimed Polish linguists is offered. In the second part, a pilot study involving a test given to Polish students is discussed. Finally, standard patterns are compared to the actual usage of the nouns tested. The objective is to identify regularities in the assignment of case endings. Results of this pilot study are to be treated as hints for further research on current alternations in case forms. 1. Overview In Modern Polish, nouns follow a number of declensions. Two tendencies can be observed: genitive forms are increasingly used in the accusative case and, somewhat less often, accusative forms are used in the genitive case. These alternations are common in both numbers, singular and plural, however in the singular paradigms, these developments are most striking. 1 In the singular, there are three basic patterns; there are masculine, feminine and neuter declensions. 2 Almost all masculine nouns 3 in the nominative singular end in a consonant.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Inflection Fit for Man and Machine
    Polish Inflection Fit for Man and Machine Marjorie J. McShane Memoranda in Computer and Cognitive Science Computing Research Laboratory New Mexico State University January 22, 2001 Table of Contents Preface and Acknowledgments i Introduction 1 Part I: Nouns 25 Masculine 26 Feminine 59 Neuter 79 Part II: Adjectives 89 Part III: Adverbs 101 Part IV: Verbs 109 -ać 110 -awać 129 -ąć 130 -c 135 -eć 143 -ić 153 -ieć 167 -iwać 176 -nąć 178 -ować 195 -ść 197 -uć 209 -yć 210 -ywać 215 -źć 217 References 221 Preface and Acknowledgments This book may be of interest to the following groups of people: teachers of Polish who seek a more detailed treatment of Polish inflection than is found in traditional textbooks, as well as extensive practice examples; students of Polish with those same goals; scholars studying Polish morphology, since a fresh perspective can often lead to new insights; and computational linguists, because the whole approach was driven by computational considerations. However, since the materials contained herein were not expressly catered to any single one of these groups, some degree of selective focus might be in order. This work is not a traditional treatment of Polish inflection, and users should be aware that some traditional assumptions must be left behind. This issue is discussed at length in the Introduction. Special thanks to Adam Przepiórkowski. Not being a native speaker, I particularly appreciate his help with the Polish and his many excellent suggestions. Naturally, any remaining mistakes are my own and, if brought to my attention, will be posted as a list of errata on the web page housing the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Verbal Nouns and Event Structure in Scottish Gaelic
    162 Ve rbal Nouns and Event Structure in Scottish Gaelic Gillian Catriona Ramchand, Stanford University Background 'to Scottish Gaelic The verbal noun in Scottish Gaelic is interesting because it appears in a substantial proportion of purely verbal predications as well as being the stan­ dard way of expressing event nominals in the language. This paper is an attempt to arrive at some semantic generalizations about the systematic con­ tributions of the verbal noun to the aspectual interpretation of predicational phrases, and to do so in such a way as to reconcile its use in the nominal contexts as well. As a starting point, some background to the linguistic structures of Scottish Gaelic (henceforth SGaelic) is necessary. SGaelic is a VSO language, which means that the tense carrying verb is always the first element in a sentence (even those within subordinate clauses). The subject comes immediately after this tensed element, followed by the object and any adjuncts. Consider the fol­ lowing sentences in Scottish Gaelic. 'Periphrastic' tenses have a tense-carrying auxiliary while the 'simple' tenses do not. ( 1) a Chunnaic Calum am balach. See-PAST Calum the boY-DIR "Calum saw the boy." b *Chunnaic Calum a'bhalaich. See-PAST Calum the bOY-GEN "Calum saw the boy." (2) a Bha Calum air am balach (a) fhaicinn. Be-PAST Calum 'air' the boY-DIR 'a' see-VNOUN "Calum had seen the boy." b *Bha Calum air a'bhalaich (a) fhaicinn. Be-PAST Calum 'air' the bOY-GEN 'a' see-VNOUN "Calum had seen the boy." (3) a Bha Calum a' faicinn a'bhalaich.
    [Show full text]
  • Allomorphy in Optimality Theory: Polish Iotation
    ALLOMORPHY IN OPTIMALITY THEORY: POLISH IOTATION JERZY RUBACH GEERT E. BOOIJ University of Iowa Free University, Amsterdam University of Warsaw This article discusses IOTATION, a process that has been analyzed in generative phonology as a palatalization rule. We argue that optimality theory predicts the treatment of this process in terms of allomorphy, which in fact is desirable for a synchronic analysis. The consequence is that, with regard to iotation effects, the task of phonology is to account for the distribution of allomorphs rather than to derive them from a single underlying representation. While, as a result of diachronic changes, the allomorphs are arbitrary, their distribution is not. It follows from the interaction of universal phonological and morphological constraints, and from the considerations of segment markedness.* All phonological theories address the problem of the surface realization of mor- phemes. This is often straightforward because many morphemes have one invariable realization; for example, Polish dom ‘house’ is always represented as [dom]. Central to phonology are instances that are realized differently in different contexts. Tradition- ally, it is said that such instances show allomorphy because allomorphy is understood as a situation in which two or more different morphs share the same grammatical or semantic function and hence are allomorphs of one morpheme. The task of phonology is then to explain the distribution and the phonological shape of allomorphs. The most straightforward way to achieve this goal is to posit a single underlying representation and account for surface allomorphs in terms of phonological generalizations. A clear example of this situation is an analysis of the surface allomorphs [hut] and [hud] of hoed ‘hat’ in Dutch.
    [Show full text]
  • Phrasal Verbs and Associated Forms in Shakespeare
    PHRASAL VERBS AND ASSOCIATED FORMS IN SHAKESPEARE N. F. Blake University of Sheffield This paper focuses on three aspects of phrasal verbs. Firstly, to what extent examples of phrasal verbs and associated forms in Shakespeare's works provide evidence for how phrasal verbs could have arisen and developed in English.1 It is suggested that there were enough internal developments in the language to indicate that there is no need to look to other languages to explain the origin of phrasal verbs in English. Secondly, there is a discussion of what makes up a phrasal verb is, but accepts that their nature in Early Modern English is much more flexible than today. Finally, it offers some examples of how Shakespeare exploited this new development in the language and some of its benefits compared with forms consisting of prefix + stem. Current scholarship on phrasal verbs is characterised by two features: firstly, the bulk of the work deals, naturally enough, with Present Day English (PDE) and, secondly, they are treated in isolation, for associated forms are hardly mentioned in the scholarship. By associated forms I mean the extension of phrasal verbs to form adjectives or nouns, so that to sit in gives a noun a sit-in and participial adjectives like a sitting-in strategy. Historically the first phrasal verbs appeared in English after the Norman Conquest, though they remained relatively scarce until the fifteenth century that are found in any number. Phrasal verbs are colloquial in nature. In view of their growth from the fifteenth century and their link with a colloquial register, they not unnaturally occur frequently in Shakespeare's works.
    [Show full text]
  • The Identification of Bases in Morphological Paradigms
    The Identification of Bases in Morphological Paradigms Adam C. Albright University of California, Los Angeles June, 2002 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics UCLA Linguistics Department Thesis committee: Bruce Hayes, co-chair Donca Steriade, co-chair Carson Schutze¨ Brent Vine c Copyright by Adam C. Albright 2002 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The problem of bases in word-based morphology . 8 1.2 The problem of bases in stem-based morphology . 13 1.3 The problem of bases in correspondence theory . 14 1.4 Plan of the thesis . 15 2 Paradigm leveling in Yiddish 17 2.1 Leveling to the 1sg in Yiddish verb paradigms . 18 2.1.1 MHG present tense patterns . 18 2.1.2 Yiddish present tense patterns . 19 2.2 The 1sg as the “optimal base” in Yiddish . 23 2.2.1 Identifying the optimal base . 23 2.2.2 Using the 1sg as the base of Yiddish verb paradigms . 28 2.3 Comparison with other German dialects . 30 2.4 Local summary . 31 2.5 Significance of the single surface base hypothesis . 32 3 Identifying bases algorithmically 35 3.1 Desiderata for an automated learner . 36 3.2 The minimal generalization learner . 38 3.3 Metrics for sub-grammars . 43 3.4 Results for synthetic languages . 45 3.4.1 Synthetic language 1: Neutralization in suffixed forms . 45 3.4.2 Synthetic language 2: Neutralization in suffixless forms . 47 3.4.3 Synthetic language 3: Morphological neutralization . 48 3.4.4 Synthetic language 4: Lexical exceptions .
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphophonology of Russian Adjectival Inflection Morris Halle Ora Matushansky
    The Morphophonology of Russian Adjectival Inflection Morris Halle Ora Matushansky In this article, we present the morphosyntactic structure underlying the Russian adjectival declension and the phonological rules that apply to it to derive the surface representations. We describe the two declen- sion classes of Russian adjectives and argue that adjectives and nouns employ the same theme suffixes (-oj- and -o-) and, importantly, that choice of theme suffix also determines choice of Case exponents. On this view, there is no special adjectival declension class; instead, Case exponents are shared between adjectives and nouns, and the choice of a ‘‘paradigm’’ is determined by the choice of the theme suffix. The article covers all adjectival inflections, including those of the possess- ives, demonstratives, interrogatives, and paucal numerals. Keywords: Russian, adjectives, declension, theme suffixes, morphol- ogy, phonology 1 Introduction The goal of this article is to determine the underlying syntactic structure of Russian adjectives in all of their inflected forms. We aim to show that all inflected forms of an adjective have a simple, transparent morphological composition that is obscured by the operation of various phonological rules, independently motivated in Russian. Our more specific objectives are (a) to describe the two declension paradigms of Russian adjectives and (b) to determine the function of the theme suffix -oj- and of its absence from the surface representation. We are also concerned in this article with elucidating the nature of theme suffixes (so called by analogy with theme vowels of Latin and Catalan, on which see Oltra-Massuet 2000) and with comparing theme suffixes characteristic of adjectival declension classes with those of nominal declension classes and with those of verbal conjugation classes (Halle and Matushansky, in preparation).
    [Show full text]