Lesson Two – the Book of Revelation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lesson Two – the Book of Revelation The Book of Revelation Fresno School of Missions Dr. Nzash Lumeya, Director “Things which must shortly take place” Chapter 2 Thursday, 6 PM to 7 PM with free discussion available 7 to 7:30 PM. September 24, 2020 On Zoom. Zoom links will be sent before class. Lesson Two Homework. Read handout entitled Revelation Context Read Revelation chapters 1 and 2. Read Genesis chapters 1-3 Review. Revelation chapter 1. The revelation from Jesus Christ which God gave Him to show His servants what must soon take place. The time is near. Hear this and take it to heart. Greeting to the 7 churches in Asia province. From Him who is, and who was, and who is to come and from the 7 spirits before His throne and from Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ speaking to John, who was in the Spirit: 1 in a loud voice like a trumpet, told him to write on a scroll what he sees and send it to the 7 churches. Jesus was standing among 7 golden lampstands, dressed in a robe with a gold sash around his chest; hair white like wool, white as snow, eyes like blazing fire, feet like bronze glowing, voice like sound of rushing waters. Jesus held 7 stars in His right hand, double-edged sword coming out of His mouth, face shining like the brilliance of the sun. The 7 stars are the 7 angels of the churches. The 7 lampstands are the churches. If you have not accepted the Jesus Christ as your personal Savior, the wrath of God still rests on you. If you have accepted Jesus Christ as your Savior, you have been redeemed and have the seal of God on you forever. This week. But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare. Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? 2 Peter 3:10-11a NIV Genesis 1-3. In the beginning. Created beings and their attributes. Distinction of your body, soul, spirit. With God. Evil-created? Rebellion. Consequences-past, present, future. Geographical and spiritual environment of the first four churches. See research by Dr. Marius, attached here below. 2 Revelation chapter 2. To the angels of the church in Ephesus, in Smyrna, in Pergamum, and Thyatira. In Ephesus. Identifies Who is speaking to them-holds 7 stars, walks among the 7 lampstands. Acknowledgement: deeds-hard work, perseverance; cannot tolerate wicked people, have tested those who falsely claim to be apostles, endured hardship for His name, not grown weary. They hate the practices of the Nicolaitans. Held against them: forsaken the love they had at first. Call to repent: consider how far you have fallen; do the things you did at first. If not: He will remove their lampstand from its place. Whoever has (an ear)ears to hear, hear what the Spirit says to the churches. Whoever is victorious, He will give the right to eat from the tree of life-it’s in the paradise of God. In Smyrna. Identifies Who is speaking to them-the First and Last, Who died and came to life again. Acknowledgement: knows their afflictions and poverty, the slander of those who say they are Jews, but are a “synagogue of Satan”. Forewarning: don’t be afraid of what they are about to suffer; the devil will put some of them in prison to test them; they will suffer persecution for 10 days. Instruction: be faithful even to death and He will give them life. Whoever has ears to hear, hear what the Spirit says to the churches. The one victorious, will not be hurt by the 2nd death. In Pergamum. Identifies Who is speaking to them: has the “sharp, double-edged sword”; knows they live where Satan has his throne. Acknowledgement: they remain ‘true to His name; did not renounce their faith in Him, even in the faithful witness’, Antipas (put to death), days and some to the Nicolaitans’ teaching. 3 Held against them: some hold to Balaam teaching; some hold to Nicolaitans’ teaching. Call to repent. If not, He will come and fight against them with the sword of His mouth. Whoever has(an ear) ears to hear, hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To the one who is victorious, He will give the hidden manna and a white stone with a new name on it. In Thyatira. Identifies Who is speaking to them: the Son of God, eyes like burning fire, feet like burnished bronze; knows their deeds. Acknowledgement: their love, faith service, perseverance, doing more than they did at first. Held against them: they tolerate Jezebel teaching, leading them to sexual immorality and eating food offered to idols; Call to repent. she is unwilling to repent so she will suffer; He “will strike her children dead”. If those who ‘commit adultery with her’ do not repent they will suffer with her; then all the churches will know that He searches hearts and minds and will repay each according to their deeds. Instruction: To the rest who do not hold to her teaching and not learned Satan’s “deep secrets”, hold on to what they have until He comes. To the one who is victorious and does His will to the end, He will give authority (just as He received authority from His Father) over the nations and that one will rule (describes how); and will give that one the morning star. Whoever has (an ear) ears to hear, hear what the Spirit says to the churches. Next week. Consciously practice God’s Love on your family, your coworkers, your Christian brothers and sisters, your neighbors, your enemies - through the power and counsel of the Holy Spirit. Read handout, Intro to Genesis Related to Revelation, by Dr. Fitzalbert Marius. Read Revelation, chapter 3. 4 Information about the four churches in Revelation chapter 2: 1 Ephesus, though not the capital of the province of Asia, is the most known city in the province. The trade route from the Euphrates civilization terminated in Ephesus. Ephesus displaced Miletus as a trading port, but when its harbor, like that of Miletus, silted up, Smyrna replaced both.... It was a beautiful city with great temples, the most notable being the temple of Artemis, which was one of the seven wonders of the ancient world. The amphitheater which could seat 45,000 people was also a grand monument in the city. The city was known for its Greek - Roman mystery cults. Built near the shrine of an old Anatolian fertility goddess, Ephesus became the seat of an oriental cult. The Anatolian deity has been taken over by the Greeks under the name of Artemis, the Diana of the Romans. The temple of Diana was the center of pagan worship for all the Mediterranean lands. Grotesquely represented with a turreted head and many breasts, the goddess and her cult found expression in the famous temple, served like Aphrodite at Corinth, by a host of priestess courtesans. The proud title of this great commercial and religious center was “Neocorus”... the temple keeper of sacristan ... of Artemis. The temple of Artemis enjoyed services of an army of virgin priestesses, eunuch priest, choristers, vergers and acrobats... in a spate of infamous and immoral excess... in early Christian era... was a city of magic and necromancy, the home of a superstition so ancient and deeply rooted that it outlived the gods of Olympus. Ephesus was the headquarters of Paul’s great third journey. It was later the center of mission and pastoral activities of John. Smyrna was a port city along the coast. It was a city of great wealth. The city was first founded around 1200 B.C. It was destroyed around 627 B.C. by the Lydians. The city was part of the tract of Asia Minor, known as Aeolis, which was a part of the larger division of Mysia. It was located 40 miles north of Ephesus. 1 Research and written by Dr. Fitzalbert Marius,. Compiled and reformatted in pertinent part by SJ Bagley. 5 First occupied by the Aeolians (an early Greek people; perhaps the earliest of Greek stock; a mixture of Hellenes and Pelasgi), and later falling in the hands of the Ionians. It was rebuilt by Alexander the great. It became a Roman province of Asia in 133 B.C. Smyrna was known for its strong center of emperor worship. A temple to the goddess of Rome was built in 195 B.C., and in 26 A.D. a temple to Tiberius was constructed. These temples and others were built upon an acropolis, producing a dramatic effect, which during those times was described as “ The Crown of Smyrna”. Evidence shows that some first century Jewish settlements in Asia were extremely poor: because they were under great economic, geographical, and physical persecution. The most noteworthy of those persecuted was Polycarp, in 169 A.D. under the emperor Marcus Aurelius. Polycarp was a student of John; and was the bishop of Smyrna. Before being burned he said. :You threaten me with fire, which burns for an hour and is extinguished; but the fire of the future judgment and eternal punishment, you are ignorant of” The Christians of those days were persecuted with stripes, scourging, drawings, tearing, stoning, hot irons, boiling oil, wild beasts, hangings, etc. Pergamum, (modern Bergama, q.v.), city, ancient Mysia, in western Asia Minor, on the north bank of the Caicus (now Bakir) River, about 15 miles from the sea.
Recommended publications
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration
    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Cities & Islands of Asia Minor
    MASTER NEGATIVE NO. 93-81605- Y MICROFILMED 1 993 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES/NEW YORK / as part of the "Foundations of Western Civilization Preservation Project'' Funded by the NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES Reproductions may not be made without permission from Columbia University Library COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of the United States - Title 17, United photocopies or States Code - concerns the making of other reproductions of copyrighted material. and Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries or other archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy the reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that for any photocopy or other reproduction is not to be "used purpose other than private study, scholarship, or for, or later uses, a research." If a user makes a request photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of fair infringement. use," that user may be liable for copyright a This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept fulfillment of the order copy order if, in its judgement, would involve violation of the copyright law. AUTHOR: VAUX, WILLIAM SANDYS WRIGHT TITLE: GREEK CITIES ISLANDS OF ASIA MINOR PLACE: LONDON DA TE: 1877 ' Master Negative # COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT BIBLIOGRAPHIC MTCROFORM TAR^FT Original Material as Filmed - Existing Bibliographic Record m^m i» 884.7 !! V46 Vaux, V7aiion Sandys Wright, 1818-1885. ' Ancient history from the monuments. Greek cities I i and islands of Asia Minor, by W. S. W. Vaux... ' ,' London, Society for promoting Christian knowledce." ! 1877. 188. p. plate illus. 17 cm. ^iH2n KJ Restrictions on Use: TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA i? FILM SIZE: 3 S'^y^/"^ REDUCTION IMAGE RATIO: J^/ PLACEMENT: lA UA) iB .
    [Show full text]
  • The Linguistic Case for the Aiolian Migration 433
    HESPERIA JJ (2OO8) THE LINGUISTIC Pages43I~4^4 CASE FOR THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION RECONSIDERED ABSTRACT Ascribingthe presence of speakers of Lesbian in thenortheast Aegean dur- inghistorical times to themigration of Aiolian tribes from mainland Greece receivesno supportfrom linguistics. Migration is notthe only or even primary wayin whichlanguages and dialectsmay spread. Moreover, on reexamina- tion,the idea of an Aiolicdialect group falls apart. Boiotian, separated by the FirstCompensatory Lengthening from Lesbian and Thessalian, appears as a conservativedialect, most closely related to WestGreek. In turn,Lesbian andThessalian are both archaic branches of Greek that share no demonstrable commoninnovations. They are bestviewed as twoseparate relic areas of a relativelyunaltered early Greek. - To pass fromthis legendary world an aggregateof streamsdis- tinctand heterogeneous,which do notwillingly come intoconflu- ence,and cannotbe forcedto intermix- intothe vision afforded by Herodotus,we learnfrom him that in the500s B.C.the whole coast-regionfrom Dardanus southward to thepromontory of Lektum(including the town of Ilium),and fromLektum eastward to Adramyttium,had been Aeolised,or was occupiedby Aeolic - Greeks likewisethe inland towns of Skepsisand Kebren.1 This papergrew out of the researchof BrianRose, as set out in the pre- cedingarticle in thisissue of Hesperia?As head of the post-BronzeAge excavationsat Troy,Rose had long acceptedthe scholarlyconsensus in 1. Grote 1888, vol. 1, p. 305, refer- mightexpect fromthe rulesbut does markany (or an unknown) representa- = ringto Hdt. 1.149-151. not occur.The sign > means "develops tive of that class. So C any consonant; = - 2. Rose 2008. My thanksare due to to" (and the sign < means "develops H any laryngeal;Kw any labiovelar; = = Brian Rose, Don Ringe, Ronald Kim, from")an earlierform by regularsound P any labial; R any resonant(I, r, and the anonymousreviewers for Hes- changes.The sign -> means "is replaced myn); T= any dental; V= anyvowel.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of the PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW Peoples Of
    A HISTORY OF THE PELASGIAN THEORY. FEW peoples of the ancient world have given rise to so much controversy as the Pelasgians; and of few, after some centuries of discussion, is so little clearly established. Like the Phoenicians, the Celts, and of recent years the Teutons, they have been a peg upon which to hang all sorts of speculation ; and whenever an inconvenient circumstance has deranged the symmetry of a theory, it has been safe to ' call it Pelasgian and pass on.' One main reason for this ill-repute, into which the Pelasgian name has fallen, has been the very uncritical fashion in which the ancient statements about the Pelasgians have commonly been mishandled. It has been the custom to treat passages from Homer, from Herodotus, from Ephorus, and from Pausanias, as if they were so many interchangeable bricks to build up the speculative edifice; as if it needed no proof that genealogies found sum- marized in Pausanias or Apollodorus ' were taken by them from poems of the same class with the Theogony, or from ancient treatises, or from prevalent opinions ;' as if, further, ' if we find them mentioning the Pelasgian nation, they do at all events belong to an age when that name and people had nothing of the mystery which they bore to the eyes of the later Greeks, for instance of Strabo;' and as though (in the same passage) a statement of Stephanus of Byzantium about Pelasgians in Italy ' were evidence to the same effect, perfectly unexceptionable and as strictly historical as the case will admit of 1 No one doubts, of course, either that popular tradition may transmit, or that late writers may transcribe, statements which come from very early, and even from contemporary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connections Between Pergamon and Delphi (Sport and Politics in the Hellenistic Period)
    International Quarterly of Sport Science 2010/1 THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PERGAMON AND DELPHI (SPORT AND POLITICS IN THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD) István Kertész Eszterházy Károly College, Eger [email protected] Abstract In 182 B.C. Eumenes II, the king of Pergamon, renewed the games and sacrifices in honour of Athena Nicephorus and requested that the states of the Hellenistic world recognize the games of the Nicephoria. The organization and rules of the Nicephoria were equal in the music contests of the Pythian Games and in gymnastics and equestrian events of the Olympic Games. Beside the answer of a Carian town we have only the texts of decisions made by the Delphic Amphictyons and the Aetolean League and both of these decisions contain affirmative answers to the request of the Pergamene king. Why we have no other inscriptions on this subject although in that period the political- economical connections between Pergamon and the cities of Asia Minor were very friendly, and we have found a lot of written material? I think so that the fact that just these organizations gave fast and affirmative answers to Eumenes is ascribed to the very close political connections between them and Pergamon, which had already been established in the years of late 280s B.C. The facts of these connections are the followings: from this time forward, Pergamon strove for a close friendship with the sanctuary of Apollo in Delphi and later, from the years of 220 B.C., established a political alliance with the Aetolean League, the main protector of this sanctuary. Through the mediation of the latter, Pergamon became a strong ally of Rome during the Hannibalic War.
    [Show full text]
  • Iver Nestos. According to Greek Mythology, the Foundation of the City
    (Avdira). A city in Thrace (northern Greece); situated on Cape ra (a corruption of the medieval Polystylon), eleven miles northeast of iver Nestos.According to Greek mythology, the foundation of the city went to Heracles,whose eighth labor was the capture of the man-eatinghorses iomedes,king of the neighboringBistonians. However, the first attempt to Abdera, accordingto Herodotus,was made in the seventhcentury nc by ists from Clazomenae(Klazumen) in Ionia led by Tynisias,but they were n backby the Thracians.In 545nc the peopleof anotherIonian city, Teos rk), frnding Persiandomination intolerable,placed settlers on the site (in- ing the poet Anacreon)and reconstructedthe town. It controlled an exten- 2pgs-6s6veredwith vineyards and fertile,' accordingto Pindar. An ear of in is shownon its fine coins.However, the Abderanswere constantly at pains protect their territory from Thracian incursions.Nevertheless, their city was a centerfor trading with the Thracian (Odrysian)rulers of the hinterland, d provided a harbor for the commerce of upper Thrace in general. \\'hen the Persians came to Thrace in 5131512they took control of Abdera, did so once againtn 492.In 480 it was one of the halting placesselected Xerxesas he marchedthe Persianarmy along the northern shoresof the Ae- n toward Greece. As a member of the first Athenian Alliance (Delian ue) establishedafter the end of the PersianWars, it contributed (from 454 a sum of betweenten and fifteen talents,indicating its position as the third- hestcity in the League.ln 431,at the beginningof the PeloponnesianWar inst Sparta, tltook the lead in an endeavor to enroll Thrace (under the Odry- ruler Sitalces)and Macedoniain the Athenian cause.Although'Abderite' becamea synonym for stupidity, Abdera producedtwo fifth-century think- of outstandingdistinction, Democritusand Protagoras.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcoming the New Gods Interactions Between Ruler and Traditional Cults Within Ritual Practice1
    Welcoming the New Gods Interactions between Ruler and Traditional Cults within Ritual Practice1 Abstract: Among the finds uncovered during recent excavations in the small city of Aigai in Aeolis, an opistographic stele features, on its front side, a decree introducing civic and cultic honours for Seleukos I and Antiochos I. Based on the text of this decree and a few similar inscriptions, this paper discusses how Hellenistic poleis associated rulers with traditional cults as a mechanism to integrate the new gods into their religious landscape. It further appears that such associations were also a means for these poleis to articulate the rhetoric surrounding the notion of Soteria against the ideological backdrop of the liberation of cities from tyranny in the context of ruler cults. Keywords: Ruler cults; religious dynamics; Hellenistic period; Soteria; Seleucids; Aigai (Aeolis). 1. Cultic honours for Seleukos I and Antiochos I at Aigai When Greek poleis instituted new cults for Hellenistic rulers, they had at their disposal a variety of strategies. To integrate the new gods into the religious landscape, they built sanctuaries, temples, altars or statues. To integrate them into the religious calendar, they introduced processions, sacrifices, libations, prayers, and contests2. These options were rather limited and did not vary greatly from one polis to the other. However, the association of rulers with gods belonging to the civic pantheon was one of the mechanisms that poleis could use to give these new cults a truly local flavour. One fine example of such cult dynamics has recently come from Aigai, a city in Aeolis, whose urban centre is located approximately 35 kilometres south of Pergamon, on the shores of the river Pythikos3.
    [Show full text]
  • Theriomorphic Forms: Analyzing Terrestrial Animal- Human Hybrids in Ancient Greek Culture and Religion
    Theriomorphic Forms: Analyzing Terrestrial Animal- Human Hybrids in Ancient Greek Culture and Religion Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Carter, Caroline LynnLee Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 21:29:46 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/633185 THERIOMORPHIC FORMS: ANALYZING TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL-HUMAN HYBRIDS IN ANCIENT GREEK CULTURE AND RELIGION by Caroline Carter ____________________________ Copyright © Caroline Carter 2019 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES AND CLASSICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2019 THE UNIYERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Master's Committee, we certi$ that we have read the thesis prepared by Caroline Carter titled Theriomorphic Forms: Analyzing Terrestrial Animal-Humøn Hybrids in Ancíent Greek Culture and Religion and reç¡¡ü¡sr6 that it be accepted as firlfilling the disse¡tation requirement for the Master's Degree. G Date: + 26 Z¿f T MaryV o 1.011 ,AtÌ.r.ln Date: \l 41 , Dr. David Gilman Romano - 4*--l -r Date; { zé l2 Dr. David Soren r) øate:4'2 6 - l\ Dr. Kyle Mahoney Final approval and acceptance of this thesis is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the thesis to the Graduate College.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL of GREEK ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 4 2019
    ISSN: 2059-4674 Journal of Greek Archaeology Volume 4 • 2019 Journal of Greek Archaeology Journal of Greek Archaeology Volume 4: Editorial������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v John Bintliff Prehistory and Protohistory The context and nature of the evidence for metalworking from mid 4th millennium Yali (Nissyros) ������������������������������������������������������������������ 1 V. Maxwell, R. M. Ellam, N. Skarpelis and A. Sampson Living apart together. A ceramic analysis of Eastern Crete during the advanced Late Bronze Age ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 31 Charlotte Langohr The Ayios Vasileios Survey Project (Laconia, Greece): questions, aims and methods����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 67 Sofia Voutsaki, Corien Wiersma, Wieke de Neef and Adamantia Vasilogamvrou Archaic to Hellenistic Journal of The formation and development of political territory and borders in Ionia from the Archaic to the Hellenistic periods: A GIS analysis of regional space ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 96 David Hill Greek Archaeology Multi-faceted approaches
    [Show full text]
  • The Fiscal Politics of Pergamon, 188-133 B.C.E
    “The Skeleton of the State:” The Fiscal Politics of Pergamon, 188-133 B.C.E. By Noah Kaye A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California-Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Emily Mackil Professor Erich Gruen Professor Nikolaos Papazarkadas Professor Andrew Stewart Professor Dylan Sailor Fall 2012 Abstract “The Skeleton of the State:” the Fiscal Politics of Pergamon, 188-133, B.C.E. by Noah Kaye Doctor of Philosophy in Ancient History and Mediterranean Archaeology University of California, Berkeley Professor Emily Mackil, Chair In 188 B.C.E., a Roman commission awarded most of Anatolia (Asia Minor) to the Attalid dynasty, a modest fiefdom based in the city of Pergamon. Immediately, the Roman commissioners evacuated along with their force of arms. Enforcement of the settlement, known as the Treaty of Apameia, was left to local beneficiaries, chiefly the Attalids, but also the island republic of Rhodes. The extraction of revenues and the judicious redistribution of resources were both key to the extension of Attalid control over the new territory and the maintenance of the empire. This dissertation is a study of the forms of taxation and public benefaction that characterized the late Attalid kingdom, a multiscalar state comprised of many small communities, most prominent among them, ancient cities on the Greek model of the polis. It argues that the dynasty’s idiosyncratic choices about taxation and euergetism help explain the success of the Attalid imperial project. They aligned interests and created new collectivities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Smithsonian National Numismatic Collection
    SMITHSONIAN NATIONAL NUMISMATIC COLLECTION Overview of ancient Greek and Roman coins December 13, 2016 Presented here is a general overview of the ancient Greek and Roman coins within the Smithsonian Institution’s National Numismatic Collection, held at the National Museum of American History. An assessment of these coins was performed over the course of three days in late October and early November, 2016 by Christian Cloke (Smithsonian Intern), Andrew Burnett (Former Deputy Director, British Museum), Emily Pearce Seigerman (Museum Specialist), and Jennifer Gloede (Outreach and Collections Specialist). This exercise was conducted quite rapidly, and while some coins were likely misidentified or miscounted, it has also resulted in the first holistic record of this part of the collection. This assessment has revealed some exceptional strengths of the collection, including world-class holdings of eastern Roman provincial and civic coin issues and a number of older hoards, the study of which may contribute much to our understanding of the chronology of ancient coinage and economic history. A fuller record of this assessment can be found in an excel file listing Greek coins in one table and Roman in another, available on the website of the National Numismatic Collection (http://americanhistory.si.edu/national-numismatic-collection). The collection has a good representation of all areas of ancient coinage, totalling 26,972 pieces (far more than the 12,000–13,000 pieces it was estimated to contain prior to this assessment). The overall numbers of Greek and Roman coins we have tallied are: Gold Silver Bronze Unsorted/Mixed Totals Greek 131 4,775 15,999 N/A 20,905 Roman 217 2,093 3,609 148 6,067 As can be seen, the Greek collection is ultimately stronger and larger than the Roman collection, though both constitute substantial scholarly resources (and among the “Greek” coins are a great many of the Roman period, minted in the Greek eastern Mediterranean).
    [Show full text]