Current Official Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Current Official Plan THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE ST. CATHARINES PLANNING AREA OFFICE CONSOLIDATION This edition is prepared for purposes of convenience only, and for accurate reference recourse should be had to the Official Plan filed in the office of the City Clerk and in the Registry Office of Niagara North. For convenience purposes, all references to Provincial Statutes in this Office Consolidation are the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13, as amended. Updated June 2010 APPROVAL INFORMATION The Official Plan of the St. Catharines Planning Area was adopted by the Corporation of the City of St. Catharines by By-law No. 71-67 in accordance with Section 17 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P.13, as amended on April 19, 1971. ------------ "Since that time several amendments were undertaken in response to changing social and economic conditions and in response to Provincial legislation." "In 1993 Council approved a review of the Official Plan in accordance with Section 26 of the Planning Act. The Official Plan of the St. Catharines Planning Area was revised as a result of this review and the Plan was adopted by the Corporation of the City of St. Catharines on April 14, 1997 by By-law No. 97-107 in accordance with Section 17 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P. 13, as amended. On September 28, 1998 the Regional Municipality of Niagara approved with modifications and deferrals the Official Plan of the City of St. Catharines Planning Area. On December 16, 1998 the Regional Municipality of Niagara approved Deferrals No. 3, 4 and 5 to the Official Plan of the City of St. Catharines Planning Area. On March 12, 1999 the Regional Municipality of Niagara approved the lifting of Deferrals #1 and #2 to the Official Plan of the City of St. Catharines Planning Area. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. SECTION 1 PURPOSE AND EXPLANATION……………………………… Purpose Of Official Plan.................................................................... Community Goal Statements ............................................................. Duration Of Plan................................................................................ Relationship To Regional Policy Plan ............................................... Explanation Of Terms........................................................................ SECTION 2 GENERAL LAND USE PROVISIONS......................................... Settlement Patterns............................................................................. Locational Context…………………………………………………. Planning Divisions…………………………………………………. SECTION 3 HOUSING AND RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT………….. Permitted Uses……………………………………………………… Supply Of Lands……………………………………………………. Location, Site And Form Guidelines………………………………. General Residential Policies……………………………………….. Alternative Forms Of Housing…………………………………….. Monitoring Policies………………………………………………... Exceptions………………………………………………………….. SECTION 4 ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES……………………………………… Industry:……………………………………………………………. Permitted Uses – Industrial………………………………… Permitted Uses - Mixed Industrial-Commercial …………… General Policies……………………………………………. Locational Criteria…………………………………………. Design Criteria……………………………………………… Commerce:…………………………………………………………. Permitted Uses – Commercial……………………………… Permitted Uses - Mixed Commercial-Residential …………. General Policies……………………………………………. Locational Criteria…………………………………………. Design Criteria……………………………………………… Major Institutional Uses:…………………………………………… Exception …………………………………………………………... SECTION 5 ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES………………………………… Environmental Protection:…………………………………………. Objectives………………………………………………….. Criteria For Designation…………………………………… Permitted Uses…………………………………………….. Major Open Space:………………………………………………… Objectives………………………………………………….. Permitted Uses…………………………………………….. (i) General Policies:…………………………………………………… Land Acquisitions………………………………………….. Development……………………………………………….. Flood Plains………………………………………………… Wetlands…………………………………………………… Woodlands…………………………………………………. Landfilling…………………………………………………. Contaminated Sites………………………………………… SECTION 6 THE CENTRAL AREA………………………………………….. Public Development Policy………………………………………… Transportation……………………………………………………… Civic Beautification………………………………………………… SECTION 7 URBAN DESIGN, AMENITY AND HERITAGE CONSERVATION………………………….. Relationship With Natural Environment…………………………… Public Areas………………………………………………………… Universal Access…………………………………………………… Personal Safety……………………………………………………… Buffering…………………………………………………………… Signs And Street Furniture………………………………………… Design Schemes And Land Assembly……………………………… Overhead Wires……………………………………………………. Lending Shape To Built Form……………………………………… Heritage Conservation……………………………………………… Heritage Implementation…………………………………………… Archaeological Conservation………………………………………. Significant Landscapes, Vistas And Ridge-Lines…………………. SECTION 8 PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION…………………. Goals And Objectives……………………………………………… Policies And Implementation Strategies…………………………… Park Acquisitions And Development Priorities……………………. Land Acquisition……………………………………………………. Park Development…………………………………………………. Parkland Dedication……………………………………………….. Cash-In-Lieu Of Park Dedication………………………………….. Parkland Acceptability…………………………………………….. Park Development Procedures…………………………………….. Institutional Lands And Facilities…………………………………. Medium And High Density Developments………………………… Implementation And Monitoring…………………………………… SECTION 9 THE AGRICULTURAL AREA…………………………………. Land Uses…………………………………………………………... Lot Creation………………………………………………………... Group Homes………………………………………………………. SECTION 10 SCHOOLS........................................................................................ (ii) SECTION 11 TRANSPORTATION…………………………………………….. Traffic Circulation………………………………………………….. Alternative Modes Of Transportation……………………………… Parking……………………………………………………………… Canadian National Railway………………………………………… The Niagara District Airport……………………………………….. Inter-City Transportation…………………………………………… SECTION 12 DEVELOPMENT POLICIES…………………………………… Development Program……………………………………………… Population And Density……………………………………………. Servicing……………………………………………………………. Community Improvement………………………………………….. Energy Conservation……………………………………………….. SECTION 13 IMPLEMENTATION…………………………………………….. Purpose……………………………………………………………… Zoning ………………………………………………………………. Holding By-Laws…………………………………………………… Subdivision Control………………………………………………… Special Provisions………………………………………………….. Interim Control By-Laws…………………………………………… Temporary Use By-Laws…………………………………………… Site Plan Control……………………………………………………. Non-Complying Uses………………………………………………. Consents……………………………………………………………. Property Standards…………………………………………………. Boundary Interpretation…………………………………………….. Committee Of Adjustment…………………………………………. Processing Times…………………………………………………… SECTION 14 SCHEDULES……………………………………………………… Schedule A Planning Divisions …………………………………. Schedule B Land Use Plan ………………………………………. Schedule C Environmental Constraints…………………………. Schedule D Park Deficient Areas ………………………………. Schedule E Bicycle Paths & Pedestrian Walkway System …….. Schedule F Natural Environmental Features …………………… Schedule G Development Areas ………………………………… Schedule H Ultimate Road Right - Of -Way Widths ………….. Schedule I Airport Zoning Regulations………………………… Schedule J Niagara Escarpment Designations ………………….. (iii) SECTION 15 SECONDARY PLANS The Central Area Secondary Plan………………………………….. Schedule 15-A Land Use Plan…………………………………… Schedule 15-B Transportation System…………………………… Schedule 15-C Pedestrian System……………………………….. SECTION 16 The Port Dalhousie Neighbourhood Plan………………………….. Schedule 16-A Land Use Designation……………………………. Schedule 16-B Bicycle Path and Pedestrian Walkway System……………………. SECTION 17 The West St. Catharines Secondary Plan………………………….. Schedule 17-A Land Use Designations………………………….. SECTION 18 Hartzel Road - Merritton Area Secondary Plan ………………….. Schedule 18-A Planning Areas ………………………………….. Schedule 18-B Land Use Designations…………………………. Schedule 18-C Connectivity & Streetscaping Improvements……. SECTION 19 The Queenston Area Secondary Plan …………………………… Schedule 19-A Planning Areas …………………………………. Schedule 19-B Land Use Designations ………………………….. Schedule 19-C Connectivity & Streetscaping Improvements ……. (iv) SECTION I - PURPOSE AND EXPLANATION 1.1 PURPOSE The Official Plan is a document that sets out, by means of land use designations and policies, a comprehensive framework which will guide the future development of the City of St. Catharines. It will also assist Council, other public agencies and the private sector in their consideration of public and private development proposals. The Official Plan outlines the long term vision for St. Catharines' physical form and community character. It is intended to reflect the collective aims and aspirations of the citizens of St. Catharines as to the quality of life to be preserved and fostered in terms of the social, economic, and natural environment of the Municipality. 1.2 COMMUNITY GOAL STATEMENTS The following statements outline the community goals necessary to achieve a desired quality of life in St. Catharines and are the basis in which the policies in this plan were formulated. These statements also reflect the directives outlined in the City's Community-Based Strategic Plan. Quality of Life"Create a physical, economic and social environment that gives the residents and employees of the Community an ideal place for living, working and recreating, and promoting a sense of history and identity." Agriculture "Recognize our agricultural lands as one of the most significant resources in the Province and provide
Recommended publications
  • LAND by the LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems
    State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference 1996 Background Paper THE LAND BY THE LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems Ron Reid Bobolink Enterprises Washago, Ontario Canada Karen Holland U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. October 1997 ISBN 0-662-26033-3 EPA 905-R-97-015c Cat. No. En40-11/35-3-1997E ii The Land by the Lakes—SOLEC 96 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................. v 1. Overview of the Land by the Lakes .................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................ 1 1.2 Report Structure ......................................................... 2 1.3 Conclusion ............................................................. 2 1.4 Key Observations ........................................................ 3 1.5 Moving Forward ......................................................... 5 2. The Ecoregional Context .......................................................... 6 2.1 Why Consider Ecoregional Context? .......................................... 6 2.2 Classification Systems for Great Lakes Ecoregions ............................... 7 3. Where Land and Water Meet ....................................................... 9 3.1 Changing Shapes and Structures ............................................. 9 3.1.1 Crustal Tilting ................................................. 10 3.1.2 Climate ....................................................... 10 3.1.3 Erosion ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan Lamp 2000 Chapters Into a Comprehensive Document Is Summarized in Table ES-1 at the End of This Executive Summary
    Lake Michigan LaMP CONTENTS Section Page Acknowledgements Preface.......................................................................... P-1 Executive Summary............................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1 Lake Michigan LaMP Overview: Program Structure, Scope,cale, and Public Involvement 1.1 About This Chapter .......................................................... 1-1 1.2 About the LaMP – Why ...................................................... 1-1 1.3 About the LaMP – Who ...................................................... 1-2 1.4 About the LaMP – Program Structure ........................................... 1-2 1.4.1 Management Committee ............................................... 1-2 1.4.2 The Technical Coordinating Committees .................................. 1-3 1.4.3 The Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council ........................ 1-3 1.4.4 The Lake Michigan Forum ............................................. 1-3 1.5 About the LaMP- How ....................................................... 1-4 1.5.1 The Document and Reporting ........................................... 1-4 1.5.2 Science and Models: The Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project ................ 1-4 1.6 About the LaMP – Scope ..................................................... 1-5 1.7 About the LaMP – Where ..................................................... 1-6 1.8 The LaMP Document – Organization............................................ 1-9 1.9 The LaMP Document – Public Involvement ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Living with the Lakes! Liters X 0.26 = Gallons Area Square Kilometers X 0.4 = Square Miles
    LivingLiving withwith thethe LakesLakes UnderstandingUnderstanding andand AdaptingAdapting toto GreatGreat LakesLakes WaterWater LevelLevel ChangesChanges MEASUREMENTS CONVERTER TABLE U.S. to Metric Length feet x .305 = meters miles x 1.6 = kilometers The Detroit District, established in 1841, is responsible for water Volume resource development in all of Michigan and the Great Lakes watersheds in cubic feet x 0.03 = cubic meters Minnesota, Wisconsin and Indiana. gallons x 3.8 = liters Area square miles x 2.6 = square kilometers Mass pounds x 0.45 = kilograms Metric to U.S. The Great Lakes Commission is an eight-state compact agency established in Length 1955 to promote the orderly, integrated and comprehensive development, use and conservation of the water resources of the Great Lakes basin. meters x 3.28 = feet kilometers x 0.6 = miles Volume cubic meters x 35.3 = cubic feet Order your copy of Living with the Lakes! liters x 0.26 = gallons Area square kilometers x 0.4 = square miles Mass kilograms x 2.2 = pounds This publication is a joint project of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Photo credits Detroit District, and the Great Lakes Commission. Cover: Michigan Travel Bureau; Page 3 (l. to r.): Michigan Travel Bureau, Michigan Travel Bureau, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant (photo by David Editors Riecks); Page 4: Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant (photo by David Riecks); Page 5: Roger Gauthier, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Detroit District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (image by Lisa Jipping); Page 8: Michael J. Donahue, Julie Wagemakers and Tom Crane, Great Lakes Commission Michigan Travel Bureau; Page 9: National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (photo by Richard Frear); Page 10 (t.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk Niagara Peninsula
    Bronte Kilbride Cedar Springs Sheldon Creek Sheldon Creek Mississauga Point Alton Two Mile Pond Appleby Elizabeth Gardens Four mile Creek Distribution of Fish Four Mile Pond Appleby Creek Flamboro Longmoor Carlisle Progreston Pond Medad Valley Nelson Shoreacres Creek Palatine Hill Species at Risk Progreston Fisher's Pond Palmer Sloma Drain Carlisle Pond Brant Hills Tuck Creek Highview Survey Strathcona Gardens Lake Medad Six Mile Creek Bergen Drain Bronte Creek Mountain Gardens Clarksdale Niagara Peninsula Dynes Virgil Roseland Creek Port Weller HarboEuigrht Mile PonBdutkin Drain Millgrove Station Burlington Conservation Authority Breezy's Corners Tyandaga Roseland Port Weller Beach Flamboro Centre (Map 1 of 2) Harper Corners Grindstone Creek Freeman Welland Canal Rambo Creek Weller Park Hager Creek Port Weller Airport Drain Waterdown Eight Mile Creek Gulliver's Lake Niagara Escarpment Indian Creek Lake Blacks Corners Thompson Drain La Salle Indian Point St Catharines Airport Braeheid Survey 403 Millgrove ¤£ Burlington Beach Ontario McDonald Court Falcon Creek St-Catharines ¤£55 Rockcliffe Survey Aldershot Michigan Beach Carlton Park Burlington Canal Hidden Valley Port Dalhousie St. Catharines Clappison's Corners Burlington Bay Skyway Six Mile Creek Hayesland Bayview Hamilton Harbour Martindale Pond Bridgeview Survey Facer Logie's Creek Hamilton Beach Barnesdale Henley Homer Garden City Skyway Grindstone Creek Twelve Mile Creek Rock Chapel Willow Cove Stipes Inlet Royal Botanical Gardens Borer's Falls Windermere Basin Montebello
    [Show full text]
  • THE LAND by the LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems
    State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference 1996 Background Paper THE LAND BY THE LAKES Nearshore Terrestrial Ecosystems Ron Reid Bobolink Enterprises Washago, Ontario Canada Karen Holland U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chicago, Illinois U.S.A. October 1997 ISBN 0-662-26033-3 EPA 905-R-97-015c Cat. No. En40-11/35-3-1997E ii The Land by the Lakes—SOLEC 96 Table of Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................. v 1. Overview of the Land by the Lakes .................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................ 1 1.2 Report Structure ......................................................... 2 1.3 Conclusion ............................................................. 2 1.4 Key Observations ........................................................ 3 1.5 Moving Forward ......................................................... 5 2. The Ecoregional Context .......................................................... 6 2.1 Why Consider Ecoregional Context? .......................................... 6 2.2 Classification Systems for Great Lakes Ecoregions ............................... 7 3. Where Land and Water Meet ....................................................... 9 3.1 Changing Shapes and Structures ............................................. 9 3.1.1 Crustal Tilting ................................................. 10 3.1.2 Climate ....................................................... 10 3.1.3 Erosion ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • St. Catharines, Ontario - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    St. Catharines, Ontario - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Catharines%2C_Ontario St. Catharines, Ontario Coordinates: 43.1799, -79.24 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia City of St. Catharines Historic buildings line St. Paul Street in Downtown St. Catharines; the former bed of the First Welland canal is in the foreground. Flag Logo Coat of arms Nickname: The Garden City Motto: Industry and Liberality Location of St. Catharines and its census metropolitan area in Ontario Canada Ontario Niagara 1845 (town) 1876 (city) Brian McMullan St. Catharines City Council Rick Dykstra Jim Bradley km² (37.1 sq mi) 382.68 km² (147.8 sq mi) 1,397.50 km² (539.6 sq mi) m (321 ft) 131,989 ( Ranked 33rd) 1,373.3/km² (3,556.8/sq mi) 308,596 ( Ranked 12th) 545.02/km² (1,411.6/sq mi) 390,317 ( Ranked 12th) 279.3/km² (723.4/sq mi) Source: Statistics Canada http://www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/profiles/community/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=3526053&Geo2=PR&Code2=35&Data=Count&SearchText=St.%20Catharines&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&B1=All&Custom= ) Eastern (EST) ( UTC-5) UTC-4 ) L2M-L2W, L0S 905/289 Website: City of St. Catharines (http://www.stcatharines.ca) St. Catharines (2006 population 131,989; metropolitan population 390,317) is the largest city in the Niagara Region and the sixth largest urban area in Ontario, Canada, with 97.11 1 of 9 12/27/2007 9:46 AM St. Catharines, Ontario - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Catharines%2C_Ontario square kilometres (37.5 sq mi) of land.
    [Show full text]
  • Living with the Lakes! Liters X 0.26 = Gallons Area Square Kilometers X 0.4 = Square Miles
    LivingLiving withwith thethe LakesLakes UnderstandingUnderstanding andand AdaptingAdapting toto GreatGreat LakesLakes WaterWater LevelLevel ChangesChanges MEASUREMENTS CONVERTER TABLE U.S. to Metric Length feet x .305 = meters miles x 1.6 = kilometers The Detroit District, established in 1841, is responsible for water Volume resource development in all of Michigan and the Great Lakes watersheds in cubic feet x 0.03 = cubic meters Minnesota, Wisconsin and Indiana. gallons x 3.8 = liters Area square miles x 2.6 = square kilometers Mass pounds x 0.45 = kilograms Metric to U.S. The Great Lakes Commission is an eight-state compact agency established in Length 1955 to promote the orderly, integrated and comprehensive development, use and conservation of the water resources of the Great Lakes basin. meters x 3.28 = feet kilometers x 0.6 = miles Volume cubic meters x 35.3 = cubic feet Order your copy of Living with the Lakes! liters x 0.26 = gallons Area square kilometers x 0.4 = square miles Mass kilograms x 2.2 = pounds This publication is a joint project of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Photo credits Detroit District, and the Great Lakes Commission. Cover: Michigan Travel Bureau; Page 3 (l. to r.): Michigan Travel Bureau, Michigan Travel Bureau, Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant (photo by David Editors Riecks); Page 4: Illinois-Indiana Sea Grant (photo by David Riecks); Page 5: Roger Gauthier, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Detroit District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (image by Lisa Jipping); Page 8: Michael J. Donahue, Julie Wagemakers and Tom Crane, Great Lakes Commission Michigan Travel Bureau; Page 9: National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (photo by Richard Frear); Page 10 (t.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Bay Report 2013
    SATEllITE IMAGERY, SEPTEmbER 8, 2002 The Condition of the Bay of Green Bay/Lake Michigan 2013 Michigan Bay/Lake the Bay of Green of The Condition The State of the Bay WISCONSIN UNIVERSITY OF Theresa Qualls, H.J. (Bud) Harris, Victoria Harris Victoria Harris, (Bud) H.J. Qualls, Theresa conditions andcontaminantsstatus. wildlife populations,aquaticinvasivespecies,beach fishand This editionpresentsnewdataonwaterquality, Report. Manychangeshaveoccurredduringthisperiod. yearshavepassedsincethelastStateofBay Twenty S EA GRANT INSTITUTE EA GRANT USEPA, REGION 5, GLNPO TOM ERDMAN, UWGB STATE OF THE BAY 2 CONTENTS List of Figures ............................................................................................................5 List of Tables .............................................................................................................9 Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................11 Acronyms .................................................................................................................12 Executive Summary ..............................................................................................13 2012 Green Bay Indicator Assessment ...........................................................15 Introduction .............................................................................................................16 History of Region ...................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Order in Council 810/1924
    A 3 3 f"." Approved and ordered this 2. / - day of , A.D. 1924. antGovernor. i At the Executive Council Chamber, Victoria, PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. 11; •r in the Chair. Mr. rt Mr. ! (,. n Mr. Cf)fl 11 Mr. Mr. r Mr. Mr. To His Honour The Lieutenant-Governor in Council: The undersigned has the honour to .1;.a under t.'r . ,v i et; r, 2 'f ectlon ii of the Prnvinci_•,1 ,.1-(•' on; hqsr nitre on tAlf, , :„ )1 it, . 1 . 11,!lin the -lector .1 Li..-Itriet. In ....111.ph they recide reepeetively:- D this ( of J :'1•• . APP0OV::l. this d4y of ' 4 t'nti i:recuttvp Counell. ?s, 4 E NvINCI14 EILECTIOs CO:VISs. ina ALBERNI ELECTORAL DISTRICT, Browne, Harry Hughes Alberni Cox, Charles A. " Motion, James R. " Lynn, Albert A. " Paterson, John 1. w Johnson, Edward C. Pninbridge Markes, George W. of McKay, Mrs. Annie S. Brimfield Gilmore, Jrmer E. Cachelot Christensen, Chas. B. Crpe Scott Dawley, Clarence Clayoquot Bellamy, Augustus H. Kildonan Dane, Bernard T. San Joseph Bay P.O. l-ake Stafford, Henry I. Nootka Johnstone, James C. Port Alberni Roseborough, Sariuel G. " Wood, Alex. B. a Nordstrom, George Quatsino Shuttleworth, Henry Strnndby Cooper, John P. Tofino Kvarno, John H. Ucluelet Johnson, Richard T. " Blakemore, 'im. L. River Rd. Alberni Glassford, ,Thos.S. Alberni lotion, Jas. Gordon " Lade, John B. Port Alberni LcEackeen, Norman A. " Proctor, Melford L. " Hart, Bert Ira " Vaughan, Burton L. w Vaughan, Robert C. 1, Buttery, George rrington Braddock, Arthur D. " Crawford, David II Feary, Edward J.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Resilient Coastal Communities
    Planning for Resilient Coastal Communities WELCOME Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council • Nonprofit formed in 1979 • Over 2,300 members The Watershed Council is dedicated to protecting our lakes, rivers, wetlands, and groundwater through respected advocacy, innovative education, technically sound water quality monitoring, and thorough research. Funding Provided By This workshop is funded in part by the Michigan Coastal Zone Management Program, Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S. Department of Commerce. Housekeeping All lines are To ask a question, We are muted during type your question recording the webinar. into the Q&A box. this webinar. Today’s Presenters • Dr. Drew Gronewold, Professor, University of Michigan • Dr. Guy Meadows, Professor, Michigan Technological University • Dr. Richard Norton, Professor, University of Michigan Purpose of Today’s Webinar • How to use scenario planning and climate futures • Understanding coastal dynamics and Great Lake water levels • Understanding high-risk areas and management options • Community vulnerability assessments • Shoreline regulation and the Public Trust Building Resiliency In Coastal Communities Funding Provided By Michigan Coastal Zone Management Program The PURPOSE of this program: • Study and analyze the potential coastal hazards along the Great Lakes • Engage citizens, public officials and community stakeholders • Help inform local land use policy and future master planning efforts • Create hazard-ready coastal communities What is Community Resilience? The ability of a community to anticipate, accommodate and positively adapt to or thrive amidst changing climate conditions or hazard events and enhance quality of life, reliable systems, economic vitality and conservation or resources for present and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan Update Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority
    www.baird.com Baird oceans engineering lakes design rivers science watersheds construction Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan Update Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority November 2009 11472.000 Navigating New Horizons www.baird.com Lake Ontario Shoreline Management Plan Update Prepared for Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority Prepared by W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. For further information please contact Mark Kolberg, P.Eng. at (905) 845‐5385 11472.000 Revision Date Status Comments Reviewed by Approved by 0 15/06/2009 Draft Client review 1 11/09/2009 2 19/11/2009 MK This report was prepared by W.F. Baird & Associates Coastal Engineers Ltd. for Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority. The material in it reflects the judgment of Baird & Associates in light of the information available to them at the time of preparation. Any use which a Third Party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such Third Parties. Baird & Associates accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any Third Party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. P:\11472.000 NPCA Lake Ontario SMP\G - Reports\Drafts\NPCA L Ont SMP Update Report r2.doc Navigating New Horizons Baird & Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose of Study .................................................................................
    [Show full text]