DOCSLIB.ORG

Personal Data Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Personal Data Sheet PERSONAL DATA SHEET Kay Lehman Schlozman Address: 45 Warren Street Dept. of Political Science Brookline, MA 02445 Boston College Tel: (617) 566-1101 Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 Fax: (617) 734-5756 Tel: (617) 552-4174 Fax: (617) 552-2435 e-mail: kschloz@ bc.edu Current Position: J. Joseph Moakley Professor Department of Political Science Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA Experience: Assistant Professor to Professor, 1974-; Chair, 2000-2003 Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA Distinguished Visiting Professor, 2018-2019 Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA Visiting Professor, 1987-1988, 1993-1994, 1997, 1998, 2004, 2013-2014 Harvard University, Cambridge, MA Visiting Professor, 2005 University of Paris 7 (Denis Diderot) Fulbright Lecturer, 1972-1973 University of Aix-Marseilles, Aix-en-Provence, France Academic Training: University of Chicago 1968-1973 M.A., Ph.D. in Political Science Wellesley College 1964-1968 B.A. in Sociology; Minor in English 2 Fellowships and Awards: Warren E. Miller Lifetime Achievement Award, Section on Elections, Public Opinion and Voting Behavior, American Political Science Association, 2018. Samuel J. Eldersveld Career Achievement Lifetime Award, Section on Political Organizations and Parties, American Political Science Association, 2016. Resident Scholar, Bellagio Center of the Rockefeller Foundation, Bellagio, Italy, October-November, 2015 PROSE Awards, Government and Politics and Excellence in Social Sciences, American Association of Publishers, 2012 AAPOR Book Award, American Association for Public Opinion Research, 2012. Philip E. Converse Prize, American Political Science Association, 2007 Frank J. Goodnow Award for Distinguished Service to the Profession of Political Science and the American Political Science Association, 2006 Senior Research Fellow, Ash Institute, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 2006-2007 Rowman and Littlefield Prize for Innovative Teaching, American Political Science Association, 2004 Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2003- Victoria Schuck Prize, American Political Science Association, 2002 (Co- winner) Paper Prize, Elections, Public Opinion, and Voting Section, American Political Science Association, 1996 Breckinridge Prize, Midwest Political Science Assn., 1984, 1994 Russell Sage Foundation Grant, 1985-1986 Mellon Grant, 1981-1983 Fulbright Grant, 1972-1973 Ford Foundation Fellow, 1968-1972 Phi Beta Kappa, 1968 3 Publications -- Books: Unequal and Unrepresented: Political Inequality and the People’s Voice in the New Gilded Age (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018) (with Henry E. Brady and Sidney Verba). The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012) (with Sidney Verba and Henry Brady) (Winner of PROSE Awards, Government and Politics and Excellence in Social Sciences, American Association of Publishers). The Future of Political Science: 100 Perspectives (New York: Routledge, 2009) (edited with Gary King and Norman H. Nie). The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality and Political Participation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001) (with Nancy Burns and Sidney Verba) (Co-winner: Schuck Prize, American Political Science Association). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism and American Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995) (with Sidney Verba and Henry Brady)(Winner: Philip Converse Prize, American Political Science Association; and AAPOR Book Award, American Association for Public Opinion Research, for a book that has influenced the understanding or application of survey research methodology, and/or stimulated theoretical and scientific research in public opinion). Elections in America (Winchester, MA: Allen and Unwin, 1987) (editor). Organized Interests and American Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1986) (with John T. Tierney). Injury to Insult: Unemployment, Class and Political Response (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979) (with Sidney Verba). Articles and Book Chapters: “What Happened to the Gender Gap in Participation?” in Lee Ann Banaszak and Holly McCammon, eds., 100 Years of the Nineteenth Amendment (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2018) (with Nancy Burns, Ashley Jardina, Shauna Shames, and Sidney Verba). “Growing Economic Inequality and Its (Partially) Political Roots,” Religions 8 (2017): 97 (with Henry E. Brady and Sidney Verba). “Why Did We Do It That Way Then? What Might We Do Differently Now?” in Casey Klofstad, ed., New Advances in the Study of Civic Voluntarism 4 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2016) (with Henry E. Brady and Sidney Verba). “Organizations and the Democratic Representation of Interests: What Does It Mean When Those Organizations Have No Members?” Perspectives on Politics 13: (2015): 1017-1029 (with Philip Edward Jones, Hye Young You, Traci Burch, Sidney Verba, and Henry E. Brady). “Images of an Unbiased Interest System,” Journal of European Public Policy 22: (2015), 1212-1231 (with David Lowery, Frank R. Baumgartner, Joost Berkhout, Jeffrey M. Berry, Darren Halpin, Marie Hojnakci, Heike Klüver, Beate Kohler-Koch, and Jeremy Richardson). “Louder Chorus – Same Accent: The Representation of Interests in Pressure Politics” in David Lowery, Darren R. Halpin, and Virginia Gray, eds., The Organization Ecology of Interest Communities: Assessments and Agendas (Palgrave Macmillan, 2015) (with Philip Edward Jones, Hye Young You, Traci Burch, Sidney Verba, and Henry E. Brady). “Political Mobility and Political Reproduction from Generation to Generation,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 657 (2015): 149-173 (with Henry E. Brady and Sidney Verba). “How Membership Associations Change the Balance of Representation in Washington (And How They Don’t)” in Matt Grossmann, ed., New Directions in Interest Group Politics (New York: Routledge, 2013) (with Philip Edward Jones). “Counting the Voices in the Heavenly Chorus: Pressure Participants In Washington Politics” in Darren Halpin and Grant Jordan, eds., Quantifying Group Populations (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, 2012). “Who Speaks?: Citizen Political Voice on the Internet Commons,” Daedalus 140 (2011): 121-139 (with Sidney Verba and Henry E. Brady). “Public Interest Groups” in Burdett A. Loomis, ed., CQ Press Guide to Interest Groups and Lobbying in the United States (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2011). “Weapon of the Strong?: Participatory Inequality and the Internet,” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2010): 487-510 (with Sidney Verba and Henry E. Brady). “Creative Participation: Concluding Thoughts from the Land of the Boston Tea Party,” in Michele Micheletti and Andrew McFarland, eds., Creative Participation: Responsibility-taking in the Political World (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press, 2010). “Political Participation” International Encyclopedia of Political Science 5 (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2010). “Who Sings in the Heavenly Chorus?: The Shape of the Organized Interest System,” in Jeffrey Berry, ed., The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), chap. 22. "Political Voice in an Age of Inequality," in Robert Faulkner and Susan Shell, eds., America at Risk: Threats to Self-Government in an Age of Uncertainty (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2009]), chap. 7 (with Traci Burch). “Inequalities of Political Voice” in Lawrence R. Jacobs and Theda Skocpol, eds., Inequality and American Democracy (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2005) (with Benjamin I. Page, Sidney Verba, and Morris Fiorina). “Family Ties: Understanding the Intergenerational Transmission of Participation” in Alan Zuckerman, ed., The Social Logic of Politics (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2005) (with Sidney Verba and Nancy Burns). “Political Equality: What Do We Know about It?” in Kathryn Neckerman, ed., Social Inequality (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2004)(with Sidney Verba and Henry Brady). “Unequal at the Starting Line: Creating Participatory Inequalities across Generations and Among Groups,” American Sociologist 34 (2003), 45-69 (with Sidney Verba and Nancy Burns). “Vox Populi: Public Opinion and the Democratic Dilemma,” Brookings Review, Summer, 2003, pp. 4-7. “Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care?” in Ira Katznelson and Helen Milner, eds., The State of the Discipline (New York: WW Norton, 2002). “Who Bowls?: The (Un)Changing Stratification of Participation,” in Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox, eds., Understanding Public Opinion (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2002). “Rational Action and Political Activity,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 12 (2000), 243-268, (with Sidney Verba and Henry E. Brady). “Civic Participation and the Equality Problem,” in Theda Skocpol and Morris Fiorina, eds., Civic Engagement in American Democracy (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1999) pp. 427-460 (with Sidney Verba and Henry E. Brady). 6 “Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists,” American Political Science Review 93 (1999): 153- 168 (with Henry E. Brady and Sidney Verba). “What Happened at Work Today?: A Multi-Stage Model of Gender, Employment, and Political Participation,” Journal of Politics 61 (1999): 29-54 (with Nancy Burns and Sidney Verba). “Why Can’t They Be Like We Were?: Understanding the Generation Gap in Civic Activity,” Report to the Pew Charitable Trust (with Sidney Verba, Henry E. Brady, and Jennifer Erkulwater). "Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement,"
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phd in Political Science Comprehensive Examination Guidebook
    Department of Political Science __________________________________________________________ PhD in Political Science Comprehensive Examination Guidebook Contents Pages 2-3: Examination Overview and General Directions Pages 4-10: Reading Lists Page 4- Methodology Page 5- American Government Page 6- Comparative Politics Page 7- International Relations Page 9- Public Policy Page 11-13: Sample Questions for Written Examination Page 11- Methodology Page 12- American Government Page 12- Comparative Politics Page 12- International Relations Page 13- Public Policy EXAMINATION OVERVIEW AND GENERAL DIRECTIONS Doctoral students sit For the comprehensive examination at the conclusion of all required coursework, or during their last semester of coursework. Students will ideally take their exams during the fifth semester in the program, but no later than their sixth semester. Advanced Entry students are strongly encouraged to take their exams during their Fourth semester, but no later than their FiFth semester. The comprehensive examination is a written exam based on the literature and research in the relevant Field of study and on the student’s completed coursework in that field. Petitioning to Sit for the Examination Your First step is to petition to participate in the examination. Use the Department’s graduate petition form and include the following information: 1) general statement of intent to sit For a comprehensive examination, 2) proposed primary and secondary Fields areas (see below), and 3) a list or table listing all graduate courses completed along with the Faculty instructor For the course and the grade earned This petition should be completed early in the registration period For when the student plans to sit For the exam.
    [Show full text]
  • Arend Lijphart and the 'New Institutionalism'
    CSD Center for the Study of Democracy An Organized Research Unit University of California, Irvine www.democ.uci.edu March and Olsen (1984: 734) characterize a new institutionalist approach to politics that "emphasizes relative autonomy of political institutions, possibilities for inefficiency in history, and the importance of symbolic action to an understanding of politics." Among the other points they assert to be characteristic of this "new institutionalism" are the recognition that processes may be as important as outcomes (or even more important), and the recognition that preferences are not fixed and exogenous but may change as a function of political learning in a given institutional and historical context. However, in my view, there are three key problems with the March and Olsen synthesis. First, in looking for a common ground of belief among those who use the label "new institutionalism" for their work, March and Olsen are seeking to impose a unity of perspective on a set of figures who actually have little in common. March and Olsen (1984) lump together apples, oranges, and artichokes: neo-Marxists, symbolic interactionists, and learning theorists, all under their new institutionalist umbrella. They recognize that the ideas they ascribe to the new institutionalists are "not all mutually consistent. Indeed some of them seem mutually inconsistent" (March and Olsen, 1984: 738), but they slough over this paradox for the sake of typological neatness. Second, March and Olsen (1984) completely neglect another set of figures, those
    [Show full text]
  • Weatherhead Center for International Affairs
    WEATHERHEAD CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS H A R V A R D U N I V E R S I T Y two2004-2005 thousand four – two thousand five ANNUAL REPORTS two2005-2006 thousand five – two thousand six 1737 Cambridge Street • Cambridge, MA 02138 www.wcfia.harvard.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 PEOPLE Visiting Committee 4 Executive Committee 4 Administration 6 RESEARCH ACTIVITIES Small Grants for Faculty Research Projects 8 Medium Grants for Faculty Research Projects 9 Large Grants for Faculty Research Projects 9 Large Grants for Faculty Research Semester Leaves 9 Distinguished Lecture Series 11 Weatherhead Initiative in International Affairs 12 CONFERENCES 13 RESEARCH SEMINARS Challenges of the Twenty-First Century 34 Communist and Postcommunist Countries 35 Comparative Politics Research Workshop 36 Comparative Politics Seminar 39 Director’s Faculty Seminar 39 Economic Growth and Development 40 Harvard-MIT Joint Seminar on Political Development 41 Herbert C. Kelman Seminar on International Conflict Analysis and Resolution 42 International Business 43 International Economics 45 International History 48 Middle East 49 Political Violence and Civil War 51 Science and Society 51 South Asia 52 Transatlantic Relations 53 U.S. Foreign Policy 54 RESEARCH PROGRAMS Canada Program 56 Fellows Program 58 Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies 65 John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies 74 Justice, Welfare, and Economics 80 Nonviolent Sanctions and Cultural Survival 82 Religion, Political Economy, and Society 84 Student Programs 85 Transnational Studies Initiative 95 U.S.-Japan Relations 96 PUBLICATIONS 104 ANNUAL REPORTS 2004–2005 / 2005–2006 - 1 - INTRODUCTION In August 2005, the Weatherhead Center moved In another first, the faculty research semester to the new Center for Government and leaves that the Center awarded in spring 2005 International Studies (CGIS) complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars PS Decline to Review Their Peers’ Work
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars PS Decline to Review Their Peers’ Work | Marijke Breuning, Jeremy Backstrom, Jeremy Brannon, Benjamin Isaak Gross, Announcing Science & Politics Political Michael Widmeier Why, and How, to Bridge the “Gap” Before Tenure: Peer-Reviewed Research May Not Be the Only Strategic Move as a Graduate Student or Young Scholar Mariano E. Bertucci Partisan Politics and Congressional Election Prospects: Political Science & Politics Evidence from the Iowa Electronic Markets Depression PSOCTOBER 2015, VOLUME 48, NUMBER 4 Joyce E. Berg, Christopher E. Peneny, and Thomas A. Rietz dep1 dep2 dep3 dep4 dep5 dep6 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 Bayesian Analysis Trace Histogram −.002 500 −.004 400 −.006 300 −.008 200 100 −.01 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 0 Iteration number −.01 −.008 −.006 −.004 −.002 Autocorrelation Density 0.80 500 all 0.60 1−half 400 2−half 0.40 300 0.20 200 0.00 100 0 10 20 30 40 0 Lag −.01 −.008 −.006 −.004 −.002 Here are some of the new features: » Bayesian analysis » IRT (item response theory) » Multilevel models for survey data » Panel-data survival models » Markov-switching models » SEM: survey data, Satorra–Bentler, survival models » Regression models for fractional data » Censored Poisson regression » Endogenous treatment effects » Unicode stata.com/psp-14 Stata is a registered trademark of StataCorp LP, 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, TX 77845, USA. OCTOBER 2015 Cambridge Journals Online For further information about this journal please go to the journal website at: journals.cambridge.org/psc APSA Task Force Reports AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION Let’s Be Heard! How to Better Communicate Political Science’s Public Value The APSA task force reports seek John H.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article the MANY VOICES of POLITICAL CULTURE Assessing Different Approaches
    Review Article THE MANY VOICES OF POLITICAL CULTURE Assessing Different Approaches By RICHARD W. WILSON Richard J. Ellis and Michael Thompson, eds. Culture Matters: Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildavsky. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1997, 252 pp. Michael Gross. Ethics and Activism: The Theory and Practice of Political Moral- ity. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997, 305 pp. Samuel P. Huntington. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996, 367 pp. Ronald Inglehart. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in Forty-three Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997, 453 pp. David I. Kertzer. Politics and Symbols:The Italian Communist Party and the Fall of Communism. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1996, 211 pp. HE popularity of political culture has waxed and waned, yet it re- Tmains an enduring feature of political studies. In recent years the appearance of many excellent books and articles has reminded us of the timeless appeal of the subject and of the need in political analysis to ac- count for values and beliefs. To what extent, though, does the current batch of studies in political culture suffer from the difficulties that plagued those of an earlier time? The recent resurgence of interest in political culture suggests the importance of assessing the relative merits of the different approaches that theorists employ. ESTABLISHING EVALUATIVE CRITERIA The earliest definitions of political culture noted the embedding of po- litical systems in sets of meanings and purposes, specifically in symbols, myths, beliefs, and values.1 Pye later enlarged upon this theme, stating 1 Sidney Verba, “Comparative Political Culture,” in Lucian W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Construction of Social Capital and the Politics of Language
    POLITICSSMITH and & KULYNYCH SOCIETY It May Be Social, but Why Is It Capital? The Social Construction of Social Capital and the Politics of Language STEPHEN SAMUEL SMITH JESSICA KULYNYCH Although the referents of the term social capital merit sustained inquiry, the term impedes understanding because of the historical association of the word capital with economic discourse. As a result of this association, applying the term social capital to civic engagement blurs crucial analytic distinctions. Moreover, there are important ideological consequences to considering things such as bowling leagues to be a form of capital and urging citizens to become social capitalists. The term social capacity, the authors argue, provides the same heuristic benefits as the term social capital without extending illusory promises of theoretical parsimony with the financial/human/social capital trinity. The word Capital had been part of legal and business terminology long before economists found employment for it. With the Roman jurists and their successors, it denoted the “prin- cipal” of a loan as distinguished from interest and other accessory claims of the lender....Thus the concept was essentially monetary, meaning either actual money, or claims to money, or some goods evaluated in money. Also, though not quite definite, its meaning was perfectly unequivocal, and there was no doubt about what was meant in every Both authors contributed equally to the writing of this article; our names are listed in random order. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 1999 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA. Smith’s work on the article is part of a larger project on urban edu- cation in Charlotte, North Carolina, that is funded by grants from the Spencer Foundation, the Parker Foundation, and the Winthrop University Research Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming in the NEXT ISSUE
    Association News contributors to the international scientific DBASSE can be accessed at http://sites. community. Nearly 500 members of the nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/index. Coming NAS have won Nobel Prizes” (See http:// htm. Presiding over DBASSE presently nasonline.org/about-nas/mission). is political scientist Kenneth Prewitt. in the For the past century and a half, mem- Scholars who are not NAS members also NEXT bers have investigated and responded to regularly participate as members of NAS questions posed by our national leaders committees, and we urge all political sci- ISSUE as a form of service to the nation without entists to give serious consideration to financial recompense. As Ralph Cicerone, these requests. A preview of some of the articles in the president of the NAS, never fails to relate The discussion at this year’s meeting April 2014 issue: to new members at the annual installation of NAS-member political scientists at ceremony, while our advice is often solic- the APSA convention centered on how to SYMPOSIUM ited—its first report to the Lincoln admin- effectively transmit the best social science US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION istration addressed whether our country knowledge to the government through FORECASTING should adopt the metric system, and sent the NRC. One issue facing the NRC in Michael Lewis-Beck and back a consensus “yes” answer—this ad- general and the DBASSE in particular Mary Stegmaier, guest editors vice is not always followed. Scientific is that by charter the NAS is not permit- FEATURES objectivity is the goal of the Academy, not ted to solicit contracts from government political advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Government 2010. Strategies of Political Inquiry, G2010
    Government 2010. Strategies of Political Inquiry, G2010 Gary King, Robert Putnam, and Sidney Verba Thursdays 12-2pm, Littauer M-17 Gary King [email protected], http://GKing.Harvard.edu Phone: 617-495-2027 Office: 34 Kirkland Street Robert Putnam [email protected] Phone: 617-495-0539 Office: 79 JFK Street, T376 Sidney Verba [email protected] Phone: 617-495-4421 Office: Littauer Center, M18 Prerequisite or corequisite: Gov1000 Overview If you could learn only one thing in graduate school, it should be how to do scholarly research. You should be able to assess the state of a scholarly literature, identify interesting questions, formulate strategies for answering them, have the methodological tools with which to conduct the research, and understand how to write up the results so they can be published. Although most graduate level courses address these issues indirectly, we provide an explicit analysis of each. We do this in the context of a variety of strategies of empirical political inquiry. Our examples cover American politics, international relations, compara- tive politics, and other subfields of political science that rely on empirical evidence. We do not address certain research in political theory for which empirical evidence is not central, but our methodological emphases will be as varied as our substantive examples. We take empirical evidence to be historical, quantitative, or anthropological. Specific methodolo- gies include survey research, experiments, non-experiments, intensive interviews, statistical analyses, case studies, and participant observation. Assignments Weekly reading assignments are listed below. Since our classes are largely participatory, be sure to complete the readings prior to the class for which they are as- signed.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf; Last Accessed August 10, 2012
    Notes Chapter 1 1. There are, of course, many “Americas.” Here, I use the word “America” interchangeably with the “United States.” I also use the words “work” and “labor” interchangeably throughout this book. This is a self-conscious decision in spite of the distinction Hannah Arendt draws between work and labor. See Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago: Univer- sity of Chicago Press, 1998). 2. To be sure, the occurrence of the word “dream” in these speeches may or may not refer to the American Dream as such. Yet, a close reading of the texts yields the conclusion that it most often does. These speeches are available at the University of California, Santa Barbara’s “American Presidency Project” website. Available at http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/; last accessed August 5, 2012. The numbers cited here reflect the follow- ing methodological considerations: (a) I have only taken into account the first of a series of six State of the Union addresses by Richard Nixon (1973); (b) I have excluded Reagan’s (1981), Bush’s (1989), Clinton’s (1993), Bush’s (2001), and Obama’s (2009) addresses before joint sessions of Congress because these were not technically State of the Union mes- sages; and (c) the word “undreamed” has been counted as an occurrence of the word “dream.” 3. See, especially, figure 2.1. More generally, see chapters 3 and 6. 4. Jennifer L. Hochschild, Facing Up to the American Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Nation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), xvii. 5. National League of Cities, “The American Dream in 2004: A Sur- vey of the American People” (Washington D.C., 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Science Review
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW AMERICAN https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000060 . POLITICAL SCIENCE https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms REVIEW , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at 08 Oct 2021 at 13:45:36 , on May 2018, Volume 112, Issue 2 112, Volume May 2018, University of Athens . May 2018 Volume 112, Issue 2 Cambridge Core For further information about this journal https://www.cambridge.org/core ISSN: 0003-0554 please go to the journal website at: cambridge.org/apsr Downloaded from 00030554_112-2.indd 1 21/03/18 7:36 AM LEAD EDITOR Jennifer Gandhi Andreas Schedler Thomas König Emory University Centro de Investigación y Docencia University of Mannheim, Germany Claudine Gay Económicas, Mexico Harvard University Frank Schimmelfennig ASSOCIATE EDITORS John Gerring ETH Zürich, Switzerland Kenneth Benoit University of Texas, Austin Carsten Q. Schneider London School of Economics Sona N. Golder Central European University, and Political Science Pennsylvania State University Budapest, Hungary Thomas Bräuninger Ruth W. Grant Sanjay Seth University of Mannheim Duke University Goldsmiths, University of London, UK Sabine Carey Julia Gray Carl K. Y. Shaw University of Mannheim University of Pennsylvania Academia Sinica, Taiwan Leigh Jenco Mary Alice Haddad Betsy Sinclair London School of Economics Wesleyan University Washington University in St. Louis and Political Science Peter A. Hall Beth A. Simmons Benjamin Lauderdale Harvard University University of Pennsylvania London School of Economics Mary Hawkesworth Dan Slater and Political Science Rutgers University University of Chicago Ingo Rohlfi ng Gretchen Helmke Rune Slothuus University of Cologne University of Rochester Aarhus University, Denmark D.
    [Show full text]
  • American Political Science Review Vol
    Vol.72 June 1978 No. 2 THE CONFERENCE BOARD INC. LIBRARY . JUL 191978 ^ „ 845 THIRD AVENUE ' I ^\\XX NEW YORK, N.Y. 10022 Ml 1%^ https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms American Political Science Review , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at 27 Sep 2021 at 13:02:49 , on 170.106.202.8 . IP address: Published Quarteriy by https://www.cambridge.org/core The American Political Science Association -£ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400155819 Downloaded from SEPTEMBER is closer than you think... Adopt these fine texts now . Lineberry AMERICAN PUBLIC POLICY What Government Does and What Difference It Mates This introductory public policy text focuses on the twin themes of policy .', „" analysis and the application of policy to key political issues. Using a two-part -' format, the book first discusses theories and methods of domestic policy * ' , analysis and then covers application of these techniques in four areas: cities, ' crime, inequality, and the management of scarcity. 296 pages; $7.95/paper. January 1978. ISBN 0-06-044013-9. https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms Lineberry & Sharkansky URBAN POLITICS AND PUBLIC POLICY Third Edition The new Third Edition features an even stronger policy approach, with new treatments of the political economy and sociology of cities and retains the extensive treatment of mass politics and elite decision making. Recent issues and data have been incorporated as well as discussions of urban fiscal crises, the sun-belt cities, public services, growth and decay as policy problems, and inequality. 416 pages; $1O.95/paper. February 1978. ISBN 0-06-044029-5.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Order in Changing Societies
    Political Order in Changing Societies by Samuel P. Huntington New Haven and London, Yale University Press Copyright © 1968 by Yale University. Seventh printing, 1973. Designed by John O. C. McCrillis, set in Baskerville type, and printed in the United States of America by The Colonial Press Inc., Clinton, Mass. For Nancy, All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form Timothy, and Nicholas (except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Library of Congress catalog card number: 68-27756 ISBN: 0-300-00584-9 (cloth), 0-300-01171-'7 (paper) Published in Great Britain, Europe, and Africa by Yale University Press, Ltd., London. Distributed in Latin America by Kaiman anti Polon, Inc., New York City; in Australasia and Southeast Asia by John Wiley & Sons Australasia Pty. Ltd., Sidney; in India by UBS Publishers' Distributors Pvt., Ltd., Delhi; in Japan by John Weatherhill, Inc., Tokyo. I·-~· I I. Political Order and Political Decay THE POLITICAL GAP The most important political distinction among countries con­ i cerns not their form of government but their degree of govern­ ment. The differences between democracy and dictatorship are less i than the differences between those countries whose politics em­ , bodies consensus, community, legitimacy, organization, effective­ ness, stability, and those countries whose politics is deficient in these qualities. Communist totalitarian states and Western liberal .states both belong generally in the category of effective rather than debile political systems. The United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union have different forms of government, but in all three systems the government governs.
    [Show full text]