DOCSLIB.ORG

The Utility of Growth Form for Predicting and Evaluating Aquatic Plant Nutrient Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Utility of Growth Form for Predicting and Evaluating Aquatic Plant Nutrient Relations THE UTILITY OF GROWTH FORM FOR PREDICTING AND EVALUATING AQUATIC PLANT NUTRIENT RELATIONS by Christopher Dean Tyrrell Master of Science, Iowa State University, 2008 Bachelor of Science, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, 2005 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Academic Unit of Biology Supervisors: Patricia A. Chambers, Ph.D., Water Science & Technology, Environment Canada and Biology Department, University of New Brunswick Joseph M. Culp, Ph.D., Water Science & Technology, Environment Canada and Biology Department, University of New Brunswick Examining Board: Stephen B. Heard, Ph.D., Biology Department, University of New Brunswick Fredericton John A. Kershaw, Ph.D., Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick Fredericton Jeff E. Houlahan, Ph.D., Biology Department, University of New Brunswick Saint John External Examiner: Matthew T. O’Hare, Ph.D., Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Natural Environment Research Council, United Kingdom This dissertation is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK April, 2015 ©Christopher D. Tyrrell, 2015 Abstract My dissertation focuses on the role of agricultural nutrient enrichment in structuring aquatic plant communities in Southern Manitoba, Canada, and changes in nutrient cycling resulting from changes in vegetation structure. Built around the “holy grail” framework of community ecology, which describes connections between the environment and ecosystem services or function as mediated by the traits of the biotic community, I explore the linkages between nutrient enrichment and aquatic plants of prairie streams focusing on species growth form (morphology) as a proxy for a suite of co-varying individual traits. I found that plant morphology interacted with environmental factors to determine which growth forms predominated in a stream: plant community shifts from being dominated by species with a submerged morphology to a community dominated by an emergent morphology as nutrient concentrations increase. I show how this pattern allows plant growth form to be used as an indicator of stream nutrient status. Further, I found that plants with similar growth forms share similar physiological features. Emergent plants have lower tissue nutrient concentrations per unit biomass and thus transfer fewer nutrients per unit biomass from the sediment to the water column than submerged plants. My work also includes a phylogenetic thread that brings novel insight: species at sites with higher nutrients all tend to be clustered in a few branches of the plant phylogeny whereas stream sites with lower nutrients have species from a diverse mixture of phylogenetic lineages. I used plant phylogeny to examine whether evolutionary history is related to tissue nutrient concentration and found the influence is mostly attributable to phenotype. These findings hint at the possibility of alternative stable states for prairie stream vegetation: a high nutrient emergent community and a ii low nutrient submerged community. These alternative states are comparable to those found in shallow lakes, where high nutrient conditions are dominated by algal growth and bring about turbid water, whereas lower nutrients are characterized by clear water and abundant macrophyte growth. The nutrient transferring functionality of these two vegetation states should also differ, but specific quantities transferred would dependent on the proportion of biomass of each growth form. iii Acknowledgements To all those who have aided me in the quest to write this “bucket of blood, sweat and tears”: Jessica Orlofske, Patricia Chambers, Joseph Culp; David Arminini, Donald Baird, Lars Båstrup-Spohr, Glenn Benoy, Sebastian Birk, Gart Bishop, Margaret Blacquier, Bob Brua, Justin Chase, Rose Chase, Tom Clair, Rose Comeau, Julie Corriveau, Jeff Crocker, Rick Cunjak, Allen Curry, Colin Curry, Ian Delorme, Zoey Duggen, Rob Ellis, Teresa Ferriera, Bruce Ford, Kate Frego, Don Flaten, Nathaniel Flaten, Laura Grace, Gail Grey, Daryl Halliwell, Kristie Heard, Steve Heard, Dave Hryn, Antti Kanninen, Karen Kidd, Melanie Lawson, Jen Lento, David Lobb, Heather Loomer, Eric Luiker, Balázs Lukács, Ross MacKay, Angella Mercer, Stephanie Melles, Liz Mills, Wendy Monk, Armin Namayandeh, Laura Noel, Rakesh Rajput, Kurt Samways, Kaj Sand-Jensen, Gary Saunders, David Soto, Katherine Standen, Alexa (Alexander) Trusiak, Jason Vanrobaeys, Adam Yates, Naomi Yuen, Bernie Zebarth; Agriculture and Agri-food Canada Potato Research Centre, Environment Canada, University of Manitoba Herbarium (WIN), University of New Brunswick Herbarium (UNB), and Mary, Tom, and Sarah Tyrrell, Grandpa McNutt, Grandma Tyrrell, Ted, John, and Susan Tyrrell: I thank you. I have made an attempt to acknowledge those who have helped me in my endeavor, but the work represented by this (or any other) dissertation is a detailed and complicated affair. I apologize to anyone who has provided me with guidance and is absent from this list, it is a fault of my memory and not of your importance. iv Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... iv Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ v Table of Figures .............................................................................................................. x Table of Tables ............................................................................................................. xiv Chapter 1 - General Introduction ................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Structure of the Dissertation .................................................................................... 7 1.4 Significance ........................................................................................................... 10 References .................................................................................................................. 11 Tables and Figures ..................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2 - Aquatic plant community response to nutrient-producing human activities in southern Manitoba, Canada .................................................................... 19 Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 19 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 19 2.2 Methods ................................................................................................................ 22 2.2.1 Study sites ...................................................................................................... 22 2.2.2 GIS data ......................................................................................................... 23 v 2.2.3 Statistical Analyses ........................................................................................ 25 2.3 Results .................................................................................................................. 29 2.3.1 GIS analysis of nutrient emitting activities ...................................................... 29 2.3.2 Site surveys .................................................................................................... 30 2.3.3 Biotic-abiotic relationships .............................................................................. 32 2.4 Discussion ............................................................................................................. 33 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................... 38 References .................................................................................................................. 39 Tables and Figures ..................................................................................................... 46 Chapter 3 - Using traits to generalize European aquatic plant trophic indices for use in Canada ................................................................................................................ 55 Abstract ....................................................................................................................... 55 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 56 3.2 Methods ................................................................................................................ 59 3.2.1 Data sources .................................................................................................. 59 3.2.2 Taxonomic identity, growth form and trophic affinity ...................................... 61 3.2.3 Site scores ...................................................................................................... 62 3.2.4 Analyses ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Christopher Dean Tyrrell Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Christopher Dean Tyrrell Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Tyrrell, Christopher Dean, "Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)" (2008). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 15419. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/15419 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Systematics of the neotropical woody bamboo genus Rhipidocladum (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) by Christopher Dean Tyrrell A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee: Lynn G. Clark, Major Professor Dennis V. Lavrov Robert S. Wallace Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2008 Copyright © Christopher Dean Tyrrell, 2008. All rights reserved. 1457571 1457571 2008 ii In memory of Thomas D. Tyrrell Festum Asinorum iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 Background and Significance 1 Research Objectives 5 Thesis Organization 6 Literature Cited 6 CHAPTER 2. PHYLOGENY OF THE BAMBOO SUBTRIBE 9 ARTHROSTYLIDIINAE WITH EMPHASIS ON RHIPIDOCLADUM Abstract 9 Introduction 10 Methods and Materials 13 Results 19 Discussion 25 Taxonomic Treatment 26 Literature Cited 31 CHAPTER 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Well-Known Plants in Each Angiosperm Order
    Well-known plants in each angiosperm order This list is generally from least evolved (most ancient) to most evolved (most modern). (I’m not sure if this applies for Eudicots; I’m listing them in the same order as APG II.) The first few plants are mostly primitive pond and aquarium plants. Next is Illicium (anise tree) from Austrobaileyales, then the magnoliids (Canellales thru Piperales), then monocots (Acorales through Zingiberales), and finally eudicots (Buxales through Dipsacales). The plants before the eudicots in this list are considered basal angiosperms. This list focuses only on angiosperms and does not look at earlier plants such as mosses, ferns, and conifers. Basal angiosperms – mostly aquatic plants Unplaced in order, placed in Amborellaceae family • Amborella trichopoda – one of the most ancient flowering plants Unplaced in order, placed in Nymphaeaceae family • Water lily • Cabomba (fanwort) • Brasenia (watershield) Ceratophyllales • Hornwort Austrobaileyales • Illicium (anise tree, star anise) Basal angiosperms - magnoliids Canellales • Drimys (winter's bark) • Tasmanian pepper Laurales • Bay laurel • Cinnamon • Avocado • Sassafras • Camphor tree • Calycanthus (sweetshrub, spicebush) • Lindera (spicebush, Benjamin bush) Magnoliales • Custard-apple • Pawpaw • guanábana (soursop) • Sugar-apple or sweetsop • Cherimoya • Magnolia • Tuliptree • Michelia • Nutmeg • Clove Piperales • Black pepper • Kava • Lizard’s tail • Aristolochia (birthwort, pipevine, Dutchman's pipe) • Asarum (wild ginger) Basal angiosperms - monocots Acorales
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska
    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Lynn G
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 26 2007 Phylogenetic Relationships Among the One- Flowered, Determinate Genera of Bambuseae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae) Lynn G. Clark Iowa State University, Ames Soejatmi Dransfield Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK Jimmy Triplett Iowa State University, Ames J. Gabriel Sánchez-Ken Iowa State University, Ames Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Lynn G.; Dransfield, Soejatmi; Triplett, Jimmy; and Sánchez-Ken, J. Gabriel (2007) "Phylogenetic Relationships Among the One-Flowered, Determinate Genera of Bambuseae (Poaceae: Bambusoideae)," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 23: Iss. 1, Article 26. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/26 Aliso 23, pp. 315–332 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG THE ONE-FLOWERED, DETERMINATE GENERA OF BAMBUSEAE (POACEAE: BAMBUSOIDEAE) LYNN G. CLARK,1,3 SOEJATMI DRANSFIELD,2 JIMMY TRIPLETT,1 AND J. GABRIEL SA´ NCHEZ-KEN1,4 1Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011-1020, USA; 2Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK 3Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Bambuseae (woody bamboos), one of two tribes recognized within Bambusoideae (true bamboos), comprise over 90% of the diversity of the subfamily, yet monophyly of
    [Show full text]
  • Gondwanan Origin of Major Monocot Groups Inferred from Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis Kåre Bremer Uppsala University
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 3 2006 Gondwanan Origin of Major Monocot Groups Inferred from Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis Kåre Bremer Uppsala University Thomas Janssen Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Bremer, Kåre and Janssen, Thomas (2006) "Gondwanan Origin of Major Monocot Groups Inferred from Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/3 Aliso 22, pp. 22-27 © 2006, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden GONDWANAN ORIGIN OF MAJOR MONO COT GROUPS INFERRED FROM DISPERSAL-VICARIANCE ANALYSIS KARE BREMERl.3 AND THOMAS JANSSEN2 lDepartment of Systematic Botany, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Norbyvagen l8D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden; 2Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Departement de Systematique et Evolution, USM 0602: Taxonomie et collections, 16 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France 3Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Historical biogeography of major monocot groups was investigated by biogeographical analysis of a dated phylogeny including 79 of the 81 monocot families using the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II (APG II) classification. Five major areas were used to describe the family distributions: Eurasia, North America, South America, Africa including Madagascar, and Australasia including New Guinea, New Caledonia, and New Zealand. In order to investigate the possible correspondence with continental breakup, the tree with its terminal distributions was fitted to the geological area cladogram «Eurasia, North America), (Africa, (South America, Australasia») and to alternative area cladograms using the TreeFitter program.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • C6 Noncarice Sedge
    CYPERACEAE etal Got Sedge? Part Two revised 24 May 2015. Draft from Designs On Nature; Up Your C 25 SEDGES, FOINS COUPANTS, LAÎCHES, ROUCHES, ROUCHETTES, & some mostly wet things in the sedge family. Because Bill Gates has been shown to eat footnotes (burp!, & enjoy it), footnotes are (italicized in the body of the text) for their protection. Someone who can spell caespitose only won way has know imagination. Much of the following is taken verbatim from other works, & often not credited. There is often not a way to paraphrase or rewrite habitat or descriptive information without changing the meaning. I am responsible for any mistakes in quoting or otherwise. This is a learning tool, & a continuation of an idea of my friend & former employer, Jock Ingels, LaFayette Home Nursery, who hoped to present more available information about a plant in one easily accessible place, instead of scattered though numerous sources. This is a work in perpetual progress, a personal learning tool, full uv misstakes, & written as a personal means instead of a public end. Redundant, repetitive, superfluous, & contradictory information is present. It is being consolidated. CYPERACEAE Sauergrasgewächse SEDGES, aka BIESIES, SEGGEN Formally described in 1789 by De Jussieu. The family name is derived from the genus name Cyperus, from the Greek kupeiros, meaning sedge. Many species are grass-like, being tufted, with long, thin, narrow leaves, jointed stems, & branched inflorescence of small flowers, & are horticulturally lumped with grasses as graminoids. Archer (2005) suggests the term graminoid be used for true grasses, & cyperoid be used for sedges. (If physical anthropologists have hominoids & hominids, why don’t we have graminoids & graminids?) There are approximately 104 genera, 4 subfamilies, 14 tribes, & about 5000 species worldwide, with 27 genera & 843 species in North America (Ball et al 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico. Arturo Gonzalez-Mas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1964 Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico. Arturo Gonzalez-mas Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Gonzalez-mas, Arturo, "Cyperaceae of Puerto Rico." (1964). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 912. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/912 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been 64—8802 microfilmed exactly as received GONZALEZ—MAS, Arturo, 1923- CYPERACEAE OF PUERTO RICO. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1964 B o ta n y University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan CYPERACEAE OF PUERTO RICO A Dissertation I' Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Botany and Plant Pathology by Arturo Gonzalez-Mas B.S., University of Puerto Rico, 1945 M.S., North Carolina State College, 1952 January, 1964 PLEASE NOTE: Not original copy. Small and unreadable print on some maps. Filmed as received. UNIVERSITY MICROFILMS, INC. ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his sincere gratitude to Dr. Clair A. Brown for his interest, guidance, and encouragement during the course of this investigation and for his helpful criticism in the preparation of the manuscript and illustrations.
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Full of Beans: a Study on the Alignment of Two Flowering Plants Classification Systems
    Full of beans: a study on the alignment of two flowering plants classification systems Yi-Yun Cheng and Bertram Ludäscher School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA {yiyunyc2,ludaesch}@illinois.edu Abstract. Advancements in technologies such as DNA analysis have given rise to new ways in organizing organisms in biodiversity classification systems. In this paper, we examine the feasibility of aligning two classification systems for flowering plants using a logic-based, Region Connection Calculus (RCC-5) ap- proach. The older “Cronquist system” (1981) classifies plants using their mor- phological features, while the more recent Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) (2016) system classifies based on many new methods including ge- nome-level analysis. In our approach, we align pairwise concepts X and Y from two taxonomies using five basic set relations: congruence (X=Y), inclusion (X>Y), inverse inclusion (X<Y), overlap (X><Y), and disjointness (X!Y). With some of the RCC-5 relationships among the Fabaceae family (beans family) and the Sapindaceae family (maple family) uncertain, we anticipate that the merging of the two classification systems will lead to numerous merged solutions, so- called possible worlds. Our research demonstrates how logic-based alignment with ambiguities can lead to multiple merged solutions, which would not have been feasible when aligning taxonomies, classifications, or other knowledge or- ganization systems (KOS) manually. We believe that this work can introduce a novel approach for aligning KOS, where merged possible worlds can serve as a minimum viable product for engaging domain experts in the loop. Keywords: taxonomy alignment, KOS alignment, interoperability 1 Introduction With the advent of large-scale technologies and datasets, it has become increasingly difficult to organize information using a stable unitary classification scheme over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Species: Melaleuca Quinquenervia
    Species: Melaleuca quinquenervia http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/melqui/all.html SPECIES: Melaleuca quinquenervia Introductory Distribution and occurrence Botanical and ecological characteristics Fire ecology Fire effects Management considerations References INTRODUCTORY SPECIES: Melaleuca quinquenervia AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION FEIS ABBREVIATION SYNONYMS NRCS PLANT CODE COMMON NAMES TAXONOMY LIFE FORM FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS OTHER STATUS AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION: Munger, Gregory T. 2005. Melaleuca quinquenervia. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2007, September 24]. FEIS ABBREVIATION: MELQUI SYNONYMS: None NRCS PLANT CODE [98]: MEQU COMMON NAMES: melaleuca cajeput paperbark tree punktree TAXONOMY: The currently accepted scientific name for melaleuca is Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S. T. Blake (Mytraceae) [9,30,31,37,41,42,94,115,116]. Turner and others [96] provide a brief review of the Melaleuca genus in Australia, indicating that all known Melaleuca spp. (up to 250) are native, and all but 9 are endemic. Boland and others [9] suggest there are about 1 of 50 9/24/2007 4:51 PM Species: Melaleuca quinquenervia http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/melqui/all.html 150 described species of Melaleuca. The name melaleuca is of Greek origin, meaning "black and white", presumably referring to the white bark that is often charred black by fire (Debenham 1962 as cited in [96]. LIFE FORM: Tree Tree-shrub FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS: Noxious weed [97] OTHER STATUS: Florida Department of Environmental Quality lists melaleuca as a Class I Prohibited aquatic plant ("under no circumstances...permitted for possession, collection, transportation, cultivation, and importation...") [27].
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Gulf, Queensland
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]