DOCSLIB.ORG

September-October 2001 Vol IV, Issue 9 and 10 Dear Readers, The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
September-October 2001 Vol IV, Issue 9 and 10 Dear Readers, The September-October 2001 Vol IV, Issue 9 and 10 United Nations Secretariat • Message from the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the occasion of for the International Strategy the International Day for Disaster Reduction for Disaster Reduction 52 rue des Pâquis/Palais Wilson • 2001 United Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction CH-1201 Geneva - Address by Mr Vladimir Petrovsky, Director-General of the United Nations Tel: 41 22 917 97 06, Office at Geneva on the occasion of the 2001 Ceremony of the United Fax: 41 22 917 90 98 Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction Email: [email protected] - Address by Sálvano Briceño Director ISDR on the occasion of the 2001 Ceremony of the United Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction • Meeting of the UN Administrative Committee on Coordination’s Sub-Committee on Water Resources • Meeting of Inter-Agency Task Force Working Group on Risk, Vulnerability and Impact Assessments • ISDR Secretariat Address the Fifth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the UN Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) • World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), Johannesburg, September 2002 • ISDR National Platforms related news - Second forum on “Extreme Natural Phenomena: Consequences, Prevention, Tools” in Leipzig, Germany - 13th meeting of the UK Advisory Committee for Natural Disaster Reduction • Building Safer Urban Communities in the South Pacific • News from Latin America and the Caribbean - International Centre for Research on the El Niño Phenomenon (CIIFEN) To Be Set Up in Guayaquil, Ecuador - CARDIN Advisory Committee meeting in Jamaica - Third Meeting of the Special Committee on Natural Disasters of the Association of Caribbean States (ACS) Dear Readers, On October 10th 2001 the international community celebrated the International Day for Disaster Reduction. On this occasion, numerous activities took place over the world; press releases were issued by the ISDR Secretariat and its partners, children produced risk maps, seminars were organized, training sessions, debates, television and radio shows, and the list goes on. The ISDR Secretariat will publish the detail of the activities undertaken by people involved in disaster reduction in all sectors and at every level. In Geneva on the occasion of the Day, the United Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction was given to this year’s winner, the Global Fire Monitoring Center (GFMC) of Freiburg University in Germany.We have pasted below the message of the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the occasion of the International Day for Disaster Reduction. You will also find extracts of the speeches given by Mr Vladimir Petrovsky, Director-General of the United Nations Office at Geneva and by the Director of the ISDR Secretariat, Mr Sálvano Briceño, on the occa- sion of the ceremony of the UN Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction. We would be grateful for any infor- mation on the celebration of the International Day for Disaster Reduction in your country, organization or ins- titution or for your entries to this year’s risk mapping context which is open until 31 December 2001. Please send your material to the ISDR Secretariat (52 rue des Pâquis, 1201 Geneva, CH, fax: 4122 917 90 98/9, email [email protected] or [email protected]).We wish you an informative read. The Secretariat for the ISDR. 1 THE SECRETARY-GENERAL MESSAGE ON THE INTERNATIONAL DAY FOR DISASTER REDUCTION "Countering Disasters, Targeting Vulnerability" 10 October 2001 The annual observance of the International Day for Disaster Reduction offers an opportuni- ty for the world community to focus its attention on preventing natural disasters and improving the way we deal with the consequences. The past year has seen no let-up in the growing incidence of natural disasters. Powerful earthquakes struck India, El Salvador and Peru; floods ravaged Africa and South Asia; droughts continued to plague Afghanistan, Central America, and Sri Lanka; and volcanic activity has again struck Ecuador. The global toll of devastation and death has left families and economies reeling. And in some cases, natural disasters can amplify man- made emergencies, as we are all too aware from unfolding events in Afghanistan. Along with the growing number of natural disasters, vulnerability is also increasing. While no country is entirely safe, poorer countries in particular lack the capacity to and prevent and prepare for disasters. With the urban population of developing countries having reached more than 1.3 bil- lion, people are forced to inhabit disaster-prone areas such as flood plains and deforested lands. Inadequate planning and land-use further raise the risks. The International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) aims to limit the losses and suffering. The strategy calls on local communities to mobilize, for example by developing risk maps and early war- ning systems. It urges Governments to create and enforce strict building codes. And it seeks to exploit scientific and technical knowledge to devise responses that go beyond short-term humani- tarian assistance. United Nations agencies and their partners are strongly committed to carrying out this strategy by bringing people and expertise together in the search for solutions. Natural hazards will always challenge us. But it is within our power to ensure that poverty does not turn hazards into unmanageable disasters. And it is within our power to join forces, address the immense complexities of disaster reduction, and build a world of resilient communities and nations equipped to counter the adverse impact of natural hazards and related environmental and technological disasters. 2001 United Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction The annual ceremony of the 2001 United Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction took place on Wednesday 10 October 2001 at the United Nations Office at Geneva (UNOG), Palais des Nations, as part of the International Day for Disaster Reduction celebrations. The ceremony was chaired by Mr. Vladimir Petrovsky, Director General of UNOG and Guest of Honour. Present was also Mr. Tatsuya Tanami, Director for International Relations and Special Projects at the Nippon Foundation, the Japanese sponsor of the United Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction. 2 Mr. Petrovsky handed over the Sasakawa Award and the cheque of 50,000 USD to the 2001laureate, the Global Fire Monitoring Centre (GFMC), which was represented by its Director, Mr. Johann Goldammer and members of his team, Ms. Blasel and Mr. Held. Together with Mr. Tanami and Mr. Briceño, the Director of the ISDR Secretariat, Mr. Petrovsky proceeded to present three Certificates of Distinction to Ms. Corazón de León, former Chair of the Civil Service Commission of the Government of the Philippines on behalf of the Philippines Institute of Volcanology (PHIVOLCS), to Mr. Terry Jeggle, on behalf of Mr. Brian Ward, one of the founding Directors of the Asian Disaster Preparedness Centre (ADPC) in Bangkok, and to Mr. Joseph Busiega, First Secretary at the Permanent Mission of Kenya to the United Nations in Geneva, on behalf of Professor Isaac Nyambok, Professor at the University of Nairobi. Four Certificates of Merit were also presented; to Mr. Amod Dixit, Director of the National Society for Earthquake Technology of Nepal, to Her Excellency, Ms. Olmeda Rivera Ramirez, Ambassador of Honduras to the United Nations in Geneva, on behalf of the " Comisión Permanente de Contingencias (COPECO) " from Honduras, to Mr. Klaus Tietze, on behalf of the Nyos Monoum Degassing Project Advisory Committee, and to Mr. Felipe Ernst, First Secretary at the Permanent Mission of the Republic of Chile to the United Nations in Geneva, on behalf of the " Oficina Nacional de Emergencia (ONEMI) " in Chile. The 2001 laureate and the recipients of Certificates were congratulated for their innovative work in the field of disaster reduction, and encouraged to pursue their efforts. The Director General of UNOG, Mr. Petrovsky, reaffirmed UNOG’s full support to the issue of disas- ter reduction as a priority concern on the international agenda, and welcomed the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (ISDR) as the unique international platform and mechanism part of the international institutions located in Geneva to promote disaster reduction activities worldwide. The ceremony was concluded by a presentation of GFMC’s activities in the field of wildfire reduc- tion at the international level, in cooperation with several UN agencies and other international sta- keholders. The ceremony was followed by substantive roundtable discussions on the ways to impro- ve disaster reduction in the twenty first century. A constructive discussion took place between the panelists (Sasakawa Laureate 2001 and the recipients of Certificates) and the floor, composed of representatives from universities and from the scientific community, who all agreed on sound awa- reness raising for successful disaster reduction initiatives. The United Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction as well as the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction were recognized as appropriate international instruments and to bring together actors in disaster reduction for the bene- fit of vulnerable communities worldwide. For information on the United Nations Sasakawa Award for Disaster Reduction and the 2002 nomi- nation process, please visit the ISDR website (www.unisdr.org) or contact Ms. Christel Rose, tel. (41 22) 917 97 17, fax (41 22) 917 90 98/9, E-mail : [email protected] 3 Mr Vladimir Petrovsky Director-General
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) : an Historical
    Public Diplomacy Division Room Nb123 B-1110 Brussels Belgium Tel.: +32(0)2 707 4414 / 4541 (A/V) Fax: +32(0)2 707 4249 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.nato.int/library Acquisitions List June 2013 New Books and Journal Articles Liste d’acquisitions Juin 2013 Nouveaux livres et articles de revues Division de la Diplomatie Publique Bureau Nb123 B-1110 Bruxelles Belgique Tél.: +32(0)2 707 4414 / 4541 (A/V) Fax: +32(0)2 707 4249 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.nato.int/library How to borrow items from the list below : As a member of the NATO HQ staff you can borrow books (Type: M) for one month, journals (Type: ART) and reference works (Type: REF) for one week. Individuals not belonging to NATO staff can borrow books through their local library via the interlibrary loan system. How to obtain the Multimedia Library publications : All Library publications are available both on the NATO Intranet and Internet websites. Comment emprunter les documents cités ci-dessous : En tant que membre du personnel de l'OTAN vous pouvez emprunter les livres (Type: M) pour un mois, les revues (Type: ART) et les ouvrages de référence (Type: REF) pour une semaine. Les personnes n'appartenant pas au personnel de l'OTAN peuvent s'adresser à leur bibliothèque locale et emprunter les livres via le système de prêt interbibliothèques. Comment obtenir les publications de la Bibliothèque multimédia : Toutes les publications de la Bibliothèque sont disponibles sur les sites Intranet et Internet de l’OTAN.
    [Show full text]
  • Dartmouth Conf Program
    The Dartmouth Conference: The First 50 Years 1960—2010 Reminiscing on the Dartmouth Conference by Yevgeny Primakov T THE PEAK OF THE COLD WAR, and facilitating conditions conducive to A the Dartmouth Conference was one of economic interaction. the few diversions from the spirit of hostility The significance of the Dartmouth Confer- available to Soviet and American intellectuals, ence relates to the fact that throughout the who were keen, and able, to explore peace- cold war, no formal Soviet-American contact making initiatives. In fact, the Dartmouth had been consistently maintained, and that participants reported to huge gap was bridged by Moscow and Washington these meetings. on the progress of their The composition of discussion and, from participants was a pri- time to time, were even mary factor in the success instructed to “test the of those meetings, and it water” regarding ideas took some time before the put forward by their gov- negotiating teams were ernments. The Dartmouth shaped the right way. At meetings were also used first, in the early 1970s, to unfetter actions under- the teams had been led taken by the two countries by professionally quali- from a propagandist connotation and present fied citizens. From the Soviet Union, political them in a more genuine perspective. But the experts and researchers working for the Insti- crucial mission for these meetings was to tute of World Economy and International establish areas of concurring interests and to Relations and the Institute of U.S. and Cana- attempt to outline mutually acceptable solutions dian Studies, organizations closely linked to to the most acute problems: nuclear weapons Soviet policymaking circles, played key roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Views of US Alliances in Asia
    When Realism and Liberalism Coincide: Russian Views of U.S. Alliances in Asia Andrew C. Kuchins Alexei V. Zagorsky July 1999 1 2 About the Authors Andrew C. Kuchins is the associate director of the Center for International Security and Cooperation at Stanford University. His current research explores the domestic and interna- tional sources for and constraints on the international behavior of the Russian Federation. Kuchins is working on a book titled Russia and the World, which is scheduled for publication by Westview Press in 2000 as part of the series Dilemmas in World Politics. Alexei Zagorsky is a senior researcher at the Institute of World Economic and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He is the author of Japan and China: Patterns of Societal Development As Seen by Japanese Historians and has written extensively on Rus- sian foreign and security policy in the Asia Pacific, comparative modernization in East Asia, and Japanese politics. In 1997–98 he was an Advanced Research Fellow in the Program on U.S.-Japan Relations at Harvard University. 3 4 When Realism and Liberalism Coincide: Russian Views of U.S. Alliances in Asia Andrew C. Kuchins Alexei V. Zagorsky Contemporary discussions of virtually any aspect of Russian foreign and security policy must take as their point of departure the extraordinarily weakened condition of the Russian Fed- eration. There is no comparable case of such a rapid and dramatic decline in the status of a great power during peacetime in modern history. The Russian economy has been in a virtual free fall for most of the 1990s.1 The World Bank estimated the Russian GNP in 1997, using fixed exchange rates not adjusted for purchasing power parity, at $403.5 billion, making Russia the twelfth-largest economy in the world, just ahead of the Netherlands and just behind South Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • N a T O's G L O B a L M I S S I O N I N T H E
    THE MANFRED WÖRNER FELLOWSHIP OF NATO 1998-1999 THE ATLANTIC CLUB OF BULGARIA NN AA TT OO’’ss GG LL OO BB AA LL MM II SS SS II OO NN II NN TT HH EE 2211SSTT CC EE NN TT UU RR YY STRATEGIC STUDY Supported by: THE GERMAN MARSHALL FUND OF THE UNITED STATES Project Director and Author of the Text: Dr. Stefan Popov Working Group: Dr. Lyubomir Ivanov Dr. Solomon Passy Marianna Panova, MIA Marin Mihaylov Sofia May 2000 THE ATLANTIC CLUB OF BULGARIA 1998-1999 MANFRED WŐRNER FELLOWSHIP N A T O ’ s G L O B A L M I S S I O N I N T H E 2 1 S T C E N T U R Y Table of Contents ABSTRACT 1 PREFACE 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 4 INTRODUCTION 5 THE ENLARGEMENT DEBATE IN THE 1990s 8 Historical Context: Setting the Stage 8 Critical Position Toward the Debate 11 Europe: Divided or United? 14 Extended Deterrence vs. Diminished Credibility 16 Military Doctrine vs. Military Spending 18 Expanded NATO, Expanded Security Risks? 19 Russia: Friend or Foe? 21 American “Manifest Destiny” 22 Summary Reflection on the Enlargement Debate 24 CONCEPTUAL DIMENSIONS: DEFENSE VS. SECURITY 27 Ideal Types Approach in International Affairs 27 A Concise Definition of the 1989 Epochal Change 30 Subject-Origin of Threat 33 Risky Factors and Situations 40 NATO’s Fundamental Identity Dilemma 44 Remark on a Negative Perception of Enlargement 46 Summary Reflection on Conceptualizing Security 48 HISTORICAL DIMENSIONS: THE YUGOSLAV WARS 52 The Early Yugoslav Crisis: A New Institutional Chaos 52 (a) Confusion Regarding Fundamentals 53 (b) European Institutions: Taken by Surprise 55 (c) UN and the Others 58 (d) Diagnosis: Institutional Paralysis 60 Kosovo: A New Kind of War 62 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ NATO’s GLOBAL MISSION IN THE 21ST CENTURY THE ATLANTIC CLUB OF BULGARIA 1998-1999 MANFRED WŐRNER FELLOWSHIP (a) A New Concept of Security Implied 63 (b) Human rights vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Multilateral Organizations
    SELECTED MULTILATERAL ORGANIZATIONS MULTILATERAL INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS IN WHICH THE UNITED STATES PARTICIPATES Explanatory note: The United States participates in the organizations named below in accordance with the provisions of treaties, other international agreements, congressional legislation, or executive arrangements. In some cases, no financial contribution is involved. Various commissions, councils, or committees subsidiary to the organizations listed here are not named separately on this list. These include the international bodies for narcotics control, which are subsidiary to the United Nations. I. United Nations, Specialized Agencies, United Nations Mission of Observers in and International Atomic Energy Agency Tajikistan Food and Agricultural Organization United Nations Mission to Prevlaka International Atomic Energy Agency United Nations Mission for the International Civil Aviation Organization Referendum in Western Sahara International Labor Organization United Nations Observer Mission in International Maritime Organization Angola United Nations Observer Mission in International Telecommunication Union Georgia United Nations United Nations Transitional Universal Postal Union Administration in East Timor World Health Organization United Nations Truce Supervision World Intellectual Property Organization Organization (Middle East) World Meteorological Organization III. Inter-American Organizations II. Peacekeeping Inter-American Indian Institute United Nations Disengagement Observer Inter-American Institute for Cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • CONFERENCE on DISARMAMENT CD/PV.870 15 March 2001
    CONFERENCE ON DISARMAMENT CD/PV.870 15 March 2001 ENGLISH FINAL RECORD OF THE EIGHT HUNDRED AND SEVENTIETH PLENARY MEETING Held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, on Thursday, 15 March 2001, at 10.15 a.m. President: Mr. Juan Enrique Vega (Chile) GE.01-60915 (E) CD/PV.870 2 The PRESIDENT (translated from Spanish): I declare open the 870th plenary meeting of the Conference on Disarmament. May I begin by bidding farewell to the Ambassador of Hungary, who will shortly be leaving to take on the functions of Director of the Division for Peace, Human Rights and Democracy in the UNESCO secretariat. Ambassador Joó has represented his country in the Conference on Disarmament since June 2000 and has performed his responsibilities with devotion and diplomatic skill. I am sure that you will wish to join me in conveying to him and to his family our very best wishes for the future. I remember that Ambassador Joó was received here on the same day that I joined as representative of Chile. We are linked by that particular circumstance. Others will recall him for what he says in his farewell statement. Ambassador Joó, you have the floor. Mr. JOÓ (Hungary): Mr. President, it is a great pleasure to see you assume the important office of President of the Conference on Disarmament. At the outset, let me congratulate you on the creative manner in which you have conducted our proceedings. I would also like to express the appreciation of my delegation to your predecessor, Mr. Christopher Westdal, for his tireless efforts to bring our deliberations closer to consensus.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Conference on Disarmament
    A/57/27 United Nations Report of the Conference on Disarmament 21 January-29 March, 13 May-28 June and 29 July-13 September 2002 General Assembly Official Records Fifty-seventh Session Supplement No. 27 (A/57/27) General Assembly Official Records Fifty-seventh Session Supplement No. 27 (A/57/27) Report of the Conference on Disarmament 21 January-29 March, 13 May-28 June and 29 July-13 September 2002 United Nations • New York, 2002 A/57/27 Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. CONTENTS Paragraph(s) Page I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 1 1 II. ORGANIZATION OF WORK OF THE CONFERENCE .................................................... 2 - 24 1 - 5 A. 2002 Session of the Conference .............................. 2 - 5 1 B. Participants in the Work of the Conference .......... 6 1 - 2 C. Attendance and Participation of States not Members of the Conference ............................. 7 - 8 2 D. Agenda and Programme of Work for the 2002 Session ....................................................... 9 - 16 2 - 4 E. Expansion of the Membership of the Conference .................................................... 17 - 19 4 F. Review of the Agenda of the Conference .............. 20 - 21 4 G. Improved and Effective Functioning of the Conference .................................................... 22 - 23 5 H. Communications from Non-Governmental Organizations ........................................................... 24 5 iii Paragraph(s) Page III. SUBSTANTIVE WORK OF THE CONFERENCE DURING ITS 2002 SESSION ....................................... 25 - 46 5 - 12 A. Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and Nuclear Disarmament ..................................... 29 - 30 6 - 7 B. Prevention of Nuclear War, including All Related Matters ................................................. 31 7 C. Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space.....… 32 - 33 7 - 8 D.
    [Show full text]
  • British Forces to Be Trained Verification
    A-PDF MERGER DEMO "~ .~.. ~,,~. TRUST AND VERIFY THE BULLETIN OF THE VERIFICATION TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION CENTRE No. 7 February 1990 • British Forces to be Trained In and in conjunction with NATO partners, on where and how Verification often inspections will be carried out. Said Col. Waters: ~Decision-making (regarding when and where inspections witt take place) wilt be at a series of levels... we don't really During his recent trip to BerHn, US Secretary of Siale know whether countries will be given speCific areas for on· James Baker outlined his vision of NATO in the 19909. site inspections ... but we would like to reserve the right to One of the major points in his speech was the proposal to carry out challenge inspections. We believe it is our create a NATO Arms Control Verification S1aff. According sovereign right 10 do Ihis ... but we do need some form of to Mr Baker such an agency would respect the principle central body of review and control. The exact form of this that verification is a national responsibility but would is not yet decided.~ Col. Waters believes this Is the way In assist NATO countries to monitor compliance with arms which any problems regarding independent decisions by control agreements. Britain or any other nation on where and when to inspect will be countered. It is not yet known how many Mr Baker's proposal was also discussed at the December inspections ACIG witt carry out per year. meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Brussels. It was supported by NATO Secretary General Mannfred Woerner According to Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Unraveling the Soviet Union: Gorbachev’S Change in World View
    Unraveling the Soviet Union: Gorbachev’s Change in World View SUSANNE STERNTHAL hen Georgian film director Tengiz Abduladze showed the script of his film W Repentance to then Georgian First Party Secretary Eduard Shevardnadze in 1981, the future Soviet foreign minister took on, as a personal mission, the struggle of getting permission for its production and then later for its release. The film, a surreal depiction of the evils of despotism and the moral need to confront the past, was a transparent allegory about Stalin and Stalinism. Shevardnadze’s family, like those of many in the apparat, including Mikhail Gorbachev, had been ravaged by the purges, and he wanted to break the silence on this painful part of Soviet history. Shevardnadze pitched the film to Moscow saying that it was about “a moral and ethical problem.”1 Five years later, when he was battling for its release, he recounted the deep unease that pervaded the Politburo. Exhuming the Soviet past and questioning Stalin were perceived as threatening the system itself. This was so because, as Shevardnadze explained in his memoirs, “a public con- demnation of the past threatened an inevitable break with its ‘methods.’”2 Indeed, the break with past “methods”—the suffocating party and state con- trols, which spawned a fearful and browbeaten population; the lies about the past, or what Robert Conquest has aphoristically called “the psychological horrors of mass falsification” that buttressed those controls; and the maintenance of a soci- ety and economy in a state of virtual war-preparedness by perpetuating the threat of the enemy and fostering a siege mentality—is precisely what Gorbachev want- ed to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Small States and International Security
    Small States and International Security Fall 2011 International Program Geneva Boston University Dr. Christina Schori Liang [email protected] 1 1. Course Overview “At the beginning of the 21st century, we face a world of extraordinary challenges— and of extraordinary interconnectedness. We are all vulnerable to new security threats, and to old threats that are evolving in complex and unpredictable ways. Either we allow this array of threats, and our responses to them, to divide us, or we come together to take effective action to meet all of them on the basis of a shared commitment to collective security.” (Kofi Annan, former UN Secretary-General, 1997-2007) This course will describe the value of small states in the international system, emphasising predominantly Switzerland’s contributing role to global peace and security. The course will then widen its scope to describe the major international security issues which define the post Cold War world. Lectures will focus primarily on contemporary global security and the broadening security environment describing the main actors (states and institutions) and their multilateral and unilateral approaches to security. The course will then focus on the increasing importance of new security issues that defy individual government control, climate change, pandemics, migration, and terrorism which have called for new approaches to international security. States can no longer solve these issues on their own, they must collaborate multilaterally and with the aid of intergovernmental agencies -- both International Organisations and Non-Governmental Organisations to develop new forms of global governance. Simultaneously, theorists and policymakers have acknowledged that the very concept of security has changed.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia, America, and Security in the Asia-Pacific
    Russia, America, and Security in the Asia-Pacific Table of Contents Foreword Vladimir Kurilov, President, FENU and Ed Smith, Director, APCSS iv Introduction Russia, America, and Security in the Asia-Pacific Rouben Azizian and Boris Reznik viii Chapter 1 Russia in the Asia-Pacific Alexander Ignatov 1 Chapter 2 Russia and the Asia-Pacific: Trends, Threats, and Common Threads Rouben Azizian 16 Chapter 3 The United States in the Asia-Pacific: A Leadership Challenge Vladimir Petrovsky 37 Chapter 4 Strategic Resets, Security Ripples, and US Interests in the Asia-Pacific Satu Limaye 50 Chapter 5 China and the Asia-Pacific: A Russian Perspective Alexander Kozhevnikov 77 Chapter 6 China and the Asia-Pacific: A US Perspective Elizabeth Van Wie Davis 93 Chapter 7 Japan and the Asia-Pacific: A Russian Perspective Viacheslav Amirov 112 Chapter 8 Japan: Militarist, Pacifist, or Realist? John Miller 129 i Chapter 9 Korea, Russia, and the 21st-Century Challenges Igor Tolstokulakov 146 Chapter 10 Resolving the North Korean Nuclear Problem: The Status Quo versus the Transformative Approach Steven Kim 162 Chapter 11 Arms Control and Non-Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction Sergey Smirnov 181 Chapter 12 Arms Proliferation and Buildup in the Asia-Pacific: Advanced Conventional Weapons Richard Bitzinger 198 Chapter 13 Regionalism in Northeast Asia and Prospects for Russia–U.S. Cooperation Artyom Lukin 215 Chapter 14 Regional Cooperation and Security: The United States and Russia 231 Jim Rolfe Index 253 ii Dear Readers, This volume is the outcome of collaborative efforts by Russian and American scholars and experts. The publication of this book was made possible by cooperation between Far Eastern National University (FENU, Vladivostok, Russia) and the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies (APCSS, Honolulu, USA), which jointly conceived and carried out the project Russia, America, and Security in the Asia-Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 the Russian Federation and Asian Security.Do
    The Russian Federation and Asian Security Marginalization or Integration? Andrew C. Kuchins Stanford University Alexi V. Zagorsky Russian Academy of Sciences October 1998 Contemporary discussions of virtually any aspect of Russian foreign and security policy must take as their point of departure the extraordinarily weakened condition of the Russian Federation. If one looks at economic and military power, the main traditional indices of national strength, Russia’s decline is dramatic. Alexei Arbatov, deputy chairman of the Committee on Defense in the Russian Duma, recently wrote that, “Not since June 1941 has the Russian military stood as perilously close to ruin as it does now.”1 The 1997 Russian military budget was officially less than $20 billion, and even including hidden or indirect expenses and the domestic purchasing power of the ruble, certainly not more than $30 billion.2 Currently the Russian GNP is approximately 8 percent that of the United States. If that number is not sufficiently sobering, Clifford Gaddy and John Steinbruner of the Brookings Institution have pointed out that the Russian economy today is about 25 percent the size of the U.S. economy in 1950—when the U.S. population was equivalent to Russia’s This paper was prepared for the conference “America’s Alliances with Japan and Korea in a Changing Northeast Asia,” August 20-22, 1998 at the Asia/Pacific Research Center, Stanford University. 1 Alexei G. Arbatov, “Military Reform in Russia,” International Security 22, no. 4 (Spring 1998): 83. 2 Ibid, p. 97. 1 2 The Russian Federation and Asian Security current population of 150 million.3 Not only are these traditional sources of national power remarkably diminished, but the state institutions responsible for making and conducting foreign and security policy are in various stages of disorder and disability.
    [Show full text]