For a Better Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For a Better Future 1 Our approach Our people Evolving health, safety, Supporting Responsible Appendices to sustainability and environment local communities supply chain For a Better Future Sustainability Report 2020 Sustainability report 2020 Our approach Our people Evolving health, safety, Supporting Responsible Appendices to sustainability and environment local communities supply chain CONTENT 2 8 26 38 60 88 Evolving health, safety, GHG emissions Appendix 2 – Message from the CEO Our approach Our people GRI Content Index and environment system and energy efficiency to sustainability 27 Our approach 28 Personnel profile 39 Health, safety, and environmental 60 GHG emissions 94 5 9 Approach to sustainability 29 Staff recruitment and reduction governance 64 Boosting energy efficiency Appendix 3 – management 31 Learning and development 40 External Initiatives 67 Outlook for 2021 UN Global Compact communication About the Group 13 Ethics and business conduct 32 Motivation on progress 17 Sustainability risk management 34 Interaction with employees 5 Who we are 19 Stakeholder engagement 36 Human rights 41 68 6 Where we operate 20 Customer interaction 37 Outlook for 2021 and the midterm 96 7 What we produce 22 EVRAZ awards in 2020 Health and Safety Supporting local Appendix 4 – 23 Memberships of associations management communities Task Force on Climate-related Financial and institutions Disclosures 23 Tax liabilities 41 Approach 69 Management approach 25 Direct economic value generated 42 HS initiatives and projects in 2020 71 Local community support projects and distributed 44 Developing the safety culture 79 Goals for 2021 and the midterm 97 46 Occupational injury prevention Appendix 5 – 47 Health protection Environmental performance 48 Transport safety 80 48 External OHS activities Responsible supply chain 49 Emergency prevention and response 102 49 Goals for 2021 and the midterm management Appendix 6 – Independent practitioner’s assurance report 81 The Group’s supply chain 50 82 Management approach 82 Promoting sustainability throughout Environmental the supply chain management 83 Goals for 2021 and the midterm 51 Management approach 52 Reducing air emissions 84 55 Balancing water supply 56 Waste stewardship Appendix 1 – 58 Protecting biodiversity About this Report 59 Outlook for 2021 and the midterm 84 Approach to reporting 84 Report boundaries 84 Identification of material topics 87 Data preparation methodology 87 Assurance 87 Contact Information EVRAZ EVRAZ Annual Sustainability Report 2020 Report 2020 Sustainability report 2020 2 3 Our approach Our people Evolving health, safety, Supporting Responsible Appendices to sustainability and environment local communities supply chain GRI 102–14 In the reporting period the health employees began working remotely. to identify and eliminate safety related risks and safety of employees became The Group believes that these measures and to bolster the safety culture through a particularly pertinent issue due to COVID- helped significantly in reducing the spread gamification. MESSAGE 19. The Group promptly implemented of the virus. all necessary measures and successfully At Raspadskaya the Group introduced FROM THE CEO adapted to new working conditions: foreign EVRAZ also endeavours to be one the pilot version of a digital network business trips were cancelled; business of the leading companies that actively use that uses artificial intelligence methods trips in Russia were restricted; transport, the latest technologies and innovations to prevent incidents: the 24/7 network canteens, and work spaces were sanitised in the area of health and safety. In 2020, ensures that employees use personal daily; thermal imagers and pyrometers as part of the risk management system, protective equipment. It is also planned were installed at checkpoints; all mass the Group launched a new mobile app, to roll out the system for vehicles, events were postponed; and most office Hunt for Risk, which allows employees with a view to monitoring that safe driving practices are being followed. HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT Our activity in the area of human resources Top-300 programme was held to train additional holiday days in case certain management is aimed at ensuring that production managers. Due to the success events arise, and financial assistance interaction with employees is based of the programme it was decided to expand in difficult life circumstances. In addition, on respect of human rights. All employees it, consequently in 2020 the Top-1000 the Group organises cultural and sporting have equal opportunities in terms programme was launched, covering events for employees and their families. of professional and personal skills, career specialists who practice effective goal- growth, a decent salary, and an attractive setting and feedback, delegation, and other EVRAZ strives to adhere to high standards social package. aspects of management. in the area of employee engagement. In order to be more productive in this Alexander Frolov Education and training are important In 2020 EVRAZ completed work to enhance area, in 2020 the Group began planning its Chief Executive Offcer aspects of staff management and key drivers the target remuneration system. Now employer brand development strategy. This of employee development within the Group. the system is even more transparent initiative confirms the Group’s commitment Each year EVRAZ implements new training and balanced (in terms of fixed and variable to being the best employer in the regions programmes, which often become a regular parts) and reflects how well the employee, where we operate and to earn the trust Dear Stakeholders, COVID-19 has encouraged us even more The year 2020 was a major challenge feature within the Group, with the most team, and department are performing. and support of our employees. to make positive change for all groups for many companies and industries, effective initiatives being embraced. The social package includes voluntary Despite the fact that 2020 was marked of people that influence and are impacted including mining and metals. We made For example, in the reporting year the third medical insurance, a pension scheme, by various unprecedented and unexpected by our business. Although, EVRAZ has every effort to adapt to the changes events, which in many ways changed always adopted a responsible approach brought about by the COVID-19 the world, EVRAZ maintained its to doing business, in 2020 we made even pandemic, and we are proud to report commitment to creating long-term value greater efforts to attain UN Sustainable that we were able to respond rapidly to it. MANAGING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS for all stakeholders. In this unstable Development Goals, and we plan We tweaked business processes, fine- environment EVRAZ once again confirmed to continue on this course. Also, in August tuned our performance, and maintained its status as a responsible employer 2020 EVRAZ joined the UN Global high product quality. Despite the difficult The protection of the environment that production processes at all enterprises and quantitative indicators compared and business partner, and also continued Compact, one of the world’s foremost situation across the world, a new working and combating climate change are gradually comply with applicable requirements. to previous periods. In 2020 the GHG to implement projects and initiatives initiatives in the field of sustainable environment, and demand volatility, EVRAZ coming to the forefront of the strategies The system is embraced at all enterprises emission intensity level was 1.97 tCO2e/tcs to protect the environment and develop development. generated EBITDA of US$2,212 million. of global companies, organisations, and is based on the plan-do-check-act (tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per local communities. and governments. EVRAZ has also (PDCA) model. In 2020 EVRAZ made major tonne of crude steel) and the Group achieved committed to these initiatives and adheres improvements in the area of managing its its goal of a GHG emission indicator of below to a responsible approach in its operations. environment impacts. The Group reduced 2 tCO2e/tcs. The Group’s total energy In 2020 the Group elaborated its its total atmospheric emissions from steel consumption fell 5.7% year-on-year. OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY Environmental strategy, which sets ambitious production by 3.7% compared to the 2019 climate targets for 2030 and is aligned level, and recycled 102.7% of non-mining I am particularly proud to mention that with sustainable development principles. waste and by-products (target: 95%). Fresh EVRAZ’s environmental protection activity Ensuring comfortable and safe working approaches their work with an understanding drop on the figure for 2019. The Group EVRAZ is also seeking to expand the scope water consumption in 2020 stood at 206.2 has been recognised at international level. conditions and monitoring and safeguarding that safety comes first. achieved zero fatalities among contractors, of its commitments to include United million m3. The Group took second place in the Wall employee health are our top priorities. however, I deeply regret to report that Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Street Journal ranking of the world’s 100 The Group seeks to ensure that a safety Our work in the area of occupational in 2020 there were five fatalities among the Paris Agreement, and the requirements In the reporting period EVRAZ published most sustainably managed companies; culture exists at all stages of production safety is geared
Recommended publications
  • We Want to Help the World Reach Net Zero and Improve People's Lives
    BP Sustainability Report 2019 Our purpose is reimagining energy for people and our planet. We want to help the world reach net zero and improve people’s lives. We will aim to dramatically reduce carbon in our operations and production and grow new low carbon businesses, products and services. We will advocate for fundamental and rapid progress towards Paris and strive to be a leader in transparency. We know we don’t have all the answers and will listen to and work with others. We want to be an energy company with purpose; one that is trusted by society, valued by shareholders and motivating for everyone who works at BP. We believe we have the experience and expertise, the relationships and the reach, the skill and the will, to do this. Introduction Message from Bernard Looney 2 Our ambition 4 2019 at a glance Energy in context 8 Sustainability at BP UN Sustainable Development Goals 11 Sustainability at BP 11 Key sustainability issues 14 Our focus areas Climate change and the energy transition 16 Our role in the energy transition 18 Our ‘reduce, improve, create’ framework 20 Accrediting our lower carbon activities 22 Reducing emissions in our operations 23 Improving our products 26 Creating low carbon businesses 30 Safety 36 Process safety 38 Personal safety 39 Safety performance 41 Our value to society 42 Creating social value 44 Social investment 45 Local workers and suppliers 46 Human rights 47 Community engagement 48 Our impact on communities 49 Labour rights 50 Doing business responsibly Environment 54 People 60 Business ethics 68 Navigating our reports Governance Our quick read Human rights governance 74 provides a summary of the Executive oversight of sustainability 74 Sustainability Report, including key Managing risks 75 highlights and performance in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Factsheet
    FTSE COMPANY REPORT Share price analysis relative to sector and index performance European Metals Holdings EMH Industrial Metals and Mining — GBP 0.69 at close 14 May 2021 Absolute Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Sector Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Index PERFORMANCE 14-May-2021 14-May-2021 14-May-2021 1.1 450 900 1D WTD MTD YTD 1 Absolute 0.0 -6.8 -4.2 7.8 400 800 Rel.Sector 1.2 -2.9 -7.5 -20.3 0.9 700 Rel.Market -1.1 -5.5 -4.8 -1.3 350 0.8 600 300 0.7 VALUATION 500 0.6 250 400 Trailing Relative Price Relative 0.5 Price Relative 200 300 PE -ve 0.4 Absolute Price (local currency) (local Price Absolute 150 EV/EBITDA -ve 200 0.3 PB 12.3 100 0.2 100 PCF -ve 0.1 50 0 Div Yield 0.0 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 Price/Sales +ve Absolute Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Relative Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Relative Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Net Debt/Equity 0.0 100 90 90 Div Payout 0.0 90 80 80 ROE -ve 80 70 70 70 Index) Share Share Sector) Share - - 60 60 60 DESCRIPTION 50 50 50 40 40 40 The Company is focusing in tin mining industry.
    [Show full text]
  • FSC National Risk Assessment
    FSC National Risk Assessment for the Russian Federation DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-RU National approval National decision body: Coordination Council, Association NRG Date: 04 June 2018 International approval FSC International Center, Performance and Standards Unit Date: 11 December 2018 International contact Name: Tatiana Diukova E-mail address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 11 December 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Russia, [email protected], [email protected] maintenance FSC-NRA-RU V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2018 – 1 of 78 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for the Russian Federation ................................................. 3 1 Background information ........................................................................................................... 4 2 List of experts involved in risk assessment and their contact details ........................................ 6 3 National risk assessment maintenance .................................................................................... 7 4 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ........................... 7 5 List of key stakeholders for consultation ................................................................................... 8 6 List of abbreviations and Russian transliterated terms* used ................................................... 8 7 Risk assessments
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Adcmemorial.Org Alternative Report on the Russian Federation's
    adcmemorial.org Alternative Report on the Russian Federation’s Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Connection with the Consideration of the Sixth Periodic State Report (2016) by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights For the Pre-Sessional Working Group of the 60th Session of the CESCR 27 February – 3 March 2017 года The Russian Federation: Violation of the Economic and Social Rights of Roma and Indigenous Minorities; Employment Discrimination against Vulnerable Groups 1 CONTENTS PREAMBLE……………………………………………………………………………………………….3 VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF ROMA AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES……………………….4 Problem: demolition of housing in dense Roma settlements, eviction of residents, deprivation of access to resources………………………………………………………………….4 Problem: violation of the rights of Roma children to education – segregation into separate “Roma” classes and schools, difficulties accessing preschool education, lack of educational opportunities for people who left or never attended school at all for various reasons………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Problem: absence of a comprehensive government strategy to overcome structural discrimination of the Roma population in the Russian Federation……………………………7 Problem: violation of the economic, social and cultural rights of indigenous peoples – seizure of territories where these peoples traditionally live and maintain their households by mining and oil and gas companies; removal of self-government bodies of indigenous peoples; repression of activists and employees of social organizations, including the fabrication of criminal cases………………………………………………………………………….7 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION OF VULNERABLE GROUPS……………………………….11 Problem: the existence of the “list of professions banned for women” results in employment discrimination against women; the Russian Federation is not implementing the recommendations and rulings of international institutions (CEDAW) to abolish this list.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 1: Parker Review Survey Results As at 2 November 2020
    Annex 1: Parker Review survey results as at 2 November 2020 The data included in this table is a representation of the survey results as at 2 November 2020, which were self-declared by the FTSE 100 companies. As at March 2021, a further seven FTSE 100 companies have appointed directors from a minority ethnic group, effective in the early months of this year. These companies have been identified through an * in the table below. 3 3 4 4 2 2 Company Company 1 1 (source: BoardEx) Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did Met Not Met Did Not Submit Data Respond Not Did 1 Admiral Group PLC a 27 Hargreaves Lansdown PLC a 2 Anglo American PLC a 28 Hikma Pharmaceuticals PLC a 3 Antofagasta PLC a 29 HSBC Holdings PLC a InterContinental Hotels 30 a 4 AstraZeneca PLC a Group PLC 5 Avast PLC a 31 Intermediate Capital Group PLC a 6 Aveva PLC a 32 Intertek Group PLC a 7 B&M European Value Retail S.A. a 33 J Sainsbury PLC a 8 Barclays PLC a 34 Johnson Matthey PLC a 9 Barratt Developments PLC a 35 Kingfisher PLC a 10 Berkeley Group Holdings PLC a 36 Legal & General Group PLC a 11 BHP Group PLC a 37 Lloyds Banking Group PLC a 12 BP PLC a 38 Melrose Industries PLC a 13 British American Tobacco PLC a 39 Mondi PLC a 14 British Land Company PLC a 40 National Grid PLC a 15 BT Group PLC a 41 NatWest Group PLC a 16 Bunzl PLC a 42 Ocado Group PLC a 17 Burberry Group PLC a 43 Pearson PLC a 18 Coca-Cola HBC AG a 44 Pennon Group PLC a 19 Compass Group PLC a 45 Phoenix Group Holdings PLC a 20 Diageo PLC a 46 Polymetal International PLC a 21 Experian PLC a 47
    [Show full text]
  • Ftse4good UK 50
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE4Good UK 50 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.81 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 5.08 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.67 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 2.56 UNITED Halma 0.74 UNITED Rio Tinto 4.68 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.36 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 6.17 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 4.3 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.56 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.64 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 3.75 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 8.25 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.47 UNITED Schroders 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 1.15 UNITED Intertek Group 0.65 UNITED Segro 0.95 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Barclays 2.1 UNITED Legal & General Group 1.1 UNITED Smith & Nephew 0.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BHP Group Plc 3.2 UNITED Lloyds Banking Group 2.39 UNITED Smurfit Kappa Group 0.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BT Group 1.23 UNITED London Stock Exchange Group 2.09 UNITED Spirax-Sarco Engineering 0.72 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Burberry Group 0.6 UNITED Mondi 0.67 UNITED SSE 1.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Coca-Cola HBC AG 0.37 UNITED National Grid 2.37 UNITED Standard Chartered 0.85 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Compass Group 1.96 UNITED Natwest Group 0.77 UNITED Tesco 1.23 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM CRH 2.08 UNITED Next 0.72 UNITED Unilever 7.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Indutry of Russia in 1998
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Richard M. Levine Russia extends over more than 75% of the territory of the According to the Minister of Natural Resources, Russia will former Soviet Union (FSU) and accordingly possesses a large not begin to replenish diminishing reserves until the period from percentage of the FSU’s mineral resources. Russia was a major 2003 to 2005, at the earliest. Although some positive trends mineral producer, accounting for a large percentage of the were appearing during the 1996-97 period, the financial crisis in FSU’s production of a range of mineral products, including 1998 set the geological sector back several years as the minimal aluminum, bauxite, cobalt, coal, diamonds, mica, natural gas, funding that had been available for exploration decreased nickel, oil, platinum-group metals, tin, and a host of other further. In 1998, 74% of all geologic prospecting was for oil metals, industrial minerals, and mineral fuels. Still, Russia was and gas (Interfax Mining and Metals Report, 1999n; Novikov significantly import-dependent on a number of mineral products, and Yastrzhembskiy, 1999). including alumina, bauxite, chromite, manganese, and titanium Lack of funding caused a deterioration of capital stock at and zirconium ores. The most significant regions of the country mining enterprises. At the majority of mining enterprises, there for metal mining were East Siberia (cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, was a sharp decrease in production indicators. As a result, in the columbium, platinum-group metals, tungsten, and zinc), the last 7 years more than 20 million metric tons (Mt) of capacity Kola Peninsula (cobalt, copper, nickel, columbium, rare-earth has been decommissioned at iron ore mining enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Argus Russian Coal
    Argus Russian Coal Issue 17-36 | Monday 9 October 2017 MARKET COmmENTARY PRICES Turkey lifts coal imports from Russia Russian coal prices $/t Turkey increased receipts of Russian thermal coal by 9pc on Delivery basis NAR kcal/kg Delivery period 6 Oct ± 29 Sep the year in January-August, to 7.79mn t, according to data fob Baltic ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 86.97 -0.20 from statistics agency Tuik, amid higher demand from utili- fob Black Sea ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 90.63 -0.25 ties and households. Russian material replaced supplies from cif Marmara* 6,000 Nov 17 100.33 0.33 South Africa, which redirected part of shipments to more fob Vostochny 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 100.00 1.00 profitable markets in Asia-Pacific this year. fob Vostochny 5,500 Nov-Dec 17 87.0 0 1.75 *assessment of Russian and non-Russian coal In August Russian coal receipts rose to over 1.26mn t, up by 15pc on the year and by around 19pc on the month. Russian coal prices $/t This year demand for sized Russian coal is higher com- Delivery basis NAR kcal/kg Delivery period Low High pared with last year because of colder winter weather in 2016-2017, a Russian supplier says. Demand for coal fines fob Baltic ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 85.25 88.00 fob Black Sea ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 89.50 91.00 from utilities has also risen amid the launch of new coal- fob Vostochny 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 100.00 100.00 fired capacity, the source adds.
    [Show full text]
  • Participating Organizations
    PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS Company Name Company Name Company Name Company Name Company Name ABB City and County of Denver Hewlett Packard Enterprise Nextworld Shell ABS Cobham Semiconductor Solutions Hitachi Consulting NLMK Shimmick Construction Advanced Micro Devices Coeur Mining Holland & Hart LLP Noble Energy Sierra Nevada Corporation AECOM CollegeDrive Test Prep and Tutoring HollyFrontier Northrop Grumman Corporation SM Energy Aera Energy LLC Collimare LLC HomeAdvisor Northwestern Mutual Solar Turbines, Inc Colorado Department of Transporta- Alarm.com Hunting Titan Nucor Steel Southwestern Energy tion Alight, Inc. Colorado Law Illinois Institute of Technology Oasis Petroleum Spectranetics Allegion Colorado Lighting, Inc IM Flash Occidental Petroleum Corporation Stanley Consultants, Inc. AMERICAN Cast Iron Pipe Company CO School of Mines Graduate Studies IMERYS Olin Corporation Statoil Ames Construction Computronix, Inc. IMI Precision Engineering Olsson Associates Stillwater Mining Company Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Condon - Johnson & Associates, Inc. Intelligent Software Solutions OppenheimerFunds Summit Materials Andeavor Connexta J.R. Butler, Inc. ORAU - Maryland Office SUNDT Apache Corp. ConocoPhillips Jacobs Orbital ATK TEAM-UP: Teacher Education Alliance Apex Engineers, Inc. Covenant Testing Technologies, LLC. Johns Manville Orica Tenaris Applied Control Equipment, LLLP Credera Jviation, Inc. OSIsoft Texas Instruments Arcadis, Inc. CTL Thompson, Inc. Kahuna Ventures LLC Parsons The RMH Group Inc. ArcelorMittal Daily Thermetrics Kansas Department of Transportation Pathfinder Systems Inc The Trade Desk Arch Coal, Inc. Dal-Tile Corp. Keane Group PDC Energy The Vertex Companies, Inc. ARCO/Murray National Construction Davidson Technologies Inc. Kenzan Peabody Energy Tierra Group International, Ltd. Arista Networks DENSO International America, Inc. Kiewit Peace Corps TimkenSteel Corporation APS- Palo Verde Generating Station DPS - Denver Teacher Residency Kimley-Horn Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard Traylor Bros., Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Constituents & Weights
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 100 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.59 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 3.7 UNITED RELX 1.88 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Admiral Group 0.35 UNITED Glencore 1.97 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.49 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 1.86 UNITED Halma 0.54 UNITED Rightmove 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.26 UNITED Hargreaves Lansdown 0.32 UNITED Rio Tinto 3.41 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashtead Group 1.26 UNITED Hikma Pharmaceuticals 0.22 UNITED Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.41 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 4.5 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 3.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 6.02 UNITED Imperial Brands 0.77 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 2.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Auto Trader Group 0.32 UNITED Informa 0.4 UNITED Royal Mail 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Avast 0.14 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.46 UNITED Sage Group 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aveva Group 0.23 UNITED Intermediate Capital Group 0.31 UNITED Sainsbury (J) 0.24 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 0.84 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.34 UNITED Schroders 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM B&M European Value Retail 0.27 UNITED Intertek Group 0.47 UNITED Scottish Mortgage Inv Tst 1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BAE Systems 0.89 UNITED ITV 0.25 UNITED Segro 0.69 UNITED KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Safety in the Framework of Sustainable Development of the Region (On the Example of the Siberian Federal District)
    E3S Web of Conferences 296, 04002 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129604002 ESMGT 2021 Environmental safety in the framework of sustainable development of the region (on the example of the Siberian Federal District) E.A. Zhidkova1,*, and I.A. Dymova2 1Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russia 2T. F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University Abstract. A statistical analysis of public opinion on environmental safety issues was carried out. The Siberian Federal District was chosen as the object of the study. Special attention is paid to the development of environmental safety in the Krasnoyarsk Territory and the Kemerovo Region (Kuzbass). The main criterion for determining the coordinates of "critical" points was the results of a social survey conducted by the Special Communications and Information Service of the Federal Security Service of Russia. The reasons for the negative impact on the state of the environment of the Siberian Federal District are revealed. It is established that when preventive measures are not so effective to maintain a high level of environmental safety, the compensation of environmental damage can pass through the organization of the institute of environmental insurance. 1 Introduction Theory and practice of sustainable development in Russia is associated with indicators of economic growth. Sustainable development is interpreted in a broader aspect at the international level and is associated not only with the economic phenomena implementation, but also with environmental and social processes. Currently, due to the ongoing scientific and technological breakthroughs, there is a limit to the use of the Russian raw-materials export model of development. On the one hand, there is a decrease in resources of producing fields, leading to a decline in economic growth, and, on the other hand, the expansion of exploration and extraction of minerals causes damage to the environment, reducing environmental safety level.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]