DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix to the Kemerovo Region Collegial Organ Decree Dated 26 December 2016 No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix to the Kemerovo Region Collegial Organ Decree Dated 26 December 2016 No 3 Appendix to the Kemerovo Region Collegial Organ Decree dated 26 December 2016 No. 667-r PASSPORT OF THE KEMEROVO REGION Kemerovo - 2015 4 Contents General Information............................................................................................................................. 3 Legal Status ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Symbols of the Kemerovo region ........................................................................................................ 3 Local Government Bodies of the Kemerovo Region ............................................................................ 4 Administrative division ....................................................................................................................... 4 Population........................................................................................................................................... 5 Territory and natural conditions........................................................................................................... 5 General information on climatic resources........................................................................................... 6 Natural resources ................................................................................................................................ 6 Economy................................................................................................................................................ 9 Industry .............................................................................................................................................. 9 Agriculture........................................................................................................................................ 10 Retail trading .................................................................................................................................... 10 Foreign trade..................................................................................................................................... 11 Transport infrastructure and communication...................................................................................... 11 Construction ..................................................................................................................................... 15 Investment ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Finances and taxes .............................................................................................................................. 16 Financial results of enterprises’ activity............................................................................................. 16 The Kemerovo Region Tax system.................................................................................................... 16 Regional banking system................................................................................................................... 17 Social sector......................................................................................................................................... 17 Professional education and science.................................................................................................... 17 System of Education ......................................................................................................................... 18 Health care........................................................................................................................................ 19 Social protection ............................................................................................................................... 20 Physical training and sport ................................................................................................................ 20 Youth policy ..................................................................................................................................... 22 National culture and policy................................................................................................................ 22 Tourism ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Mass Media ......................................................................................................................................... 26 Public and Religious Organizations ................................................................................................... 26 Indexes of Social and Economic Development of the Kemerovo Region in 2013-2015..................... 31 3 General Information Legal Status In 1943 the USSR Supreme Soviet Presidium issued a Decree No.5 dated 26 January 1943 whereunder the Kemerovo regionwas separated from the Novosibirsk regionand declared an independent Russian Federation territorial entity. According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation the Kemerovo regionis considered to be an equitable constituent territory of the Russian Federation. It possesses all powers of government (Legislative, Executive and Juridical) all over the territory excluding powers given to the Federal Government Bodies by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The status of the region is determined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and by the Articles of Agreementof the Kemerovo region. Symbols of the Kemerovo region Symbols of the Kemerovo regionwere approved by the Law of Kemerovo regiondated 07 June 2002 No. 42-ОЗ “Kemerovo regionSymbols Act”. The Kemerovo region Coat of Arms The Kemerovo region Flag 4 Local Government Bodies of the Kemerovo Region As of 01.01.2016: Legislative (representative) Body – the Kemerovo Region Congress of People’s Deputies The data of the elections of the 5th Congress deputies – 08.09.2013 Term of office of the deputies – 5 years The Elected Chairman of the Kemerovo Region Congress of People’s Deputies in 08.09.2013 – Kosyanenko Evgeniy Victorovich Postal Address of the Kemerovo Region Congress of People’s Deputies: 650064, Kemerovo, 58, Sovetsky prospect, Tel. +7 3842 45-04-50, 36-43-42/ Fax. 58-54-51 Chief Officer of the Kemerovo Region – the Governor of the Kemerovo Region Aman Tuleyev The data of power granting – 13.09.2015 Term of office – 5 years Supreme Government Executive Body of the Kemerovo Region – Collegial Organ of the Kemerovo Region The head of the Collegial Organ of the Kemerovo Region is the Governor of the Kemerovo Region Postal Address: 650064, Kemerovo, 62, Sovetsky prospect, Tel. 36-34-09/ Fax. 36-34-09 Government Executive Bodies of the Kemerovo Region Kemerovo Region Election Commission Ombudsman for Human Rights in the Kemerovo Region Ombudsman for Children’s Rights in the Kemerovo Region Kemerovo Region Commissioner for the Rights of Business People The Chamber of Control and Accounts of Kemerovo region Administrative division As of 01.01.2016: Total amount of municipalunits – 210, including: urban okrugs – 16, municipal districts (raions) – 18, urban settlements – 22, rural settlements – 154. 5 Administrative center – Kemerovo city (population: 553,100 people) Population As of 01.01.2016, the region had a population of 2,717,600 people (accounting for 14.2% of the Siberian Federal Okrug and 1.9% of the Russian Federation) Total population ratio: Urban population – 85.8%, Rural population – 14.2% Men – 45.9%, Women – 54.1% Territory and natural conditions Territory The Kemerovo Region is locatedin the southeast of Western Siberia. The total area – 95,700 sq. km, which accounts for 4% of Western Siberia and 0.56% of the Russian Federation. The region has only land boundaries. It borders the Tomsk Region in the north, Krasnoyarsk Krai and the Republic of Khakassia in the east, the Republic of Altai and Altai Krai in the south (the boundaries run alongside the main ranges of Gornaya (Mountainous) Shoria and Salair Ridge), the Novosibirsk Region in the west. The most important feature of the geographical position of the Kemerovo region is that it is located in proximity to the center of Eurasia at the junction of Western and Eastern Siberia and in the distance from seas and oceans. Natural conditions (Relief peculiarities) The Kemerovo region is situated in the southeast of Western Siberia; southeast of West Siberian Plain constitutes the northern part of the region, Kuznetsk Alatau - the western and northwestern part, Salair Ridge and ranges of Gorrnaya(Mountainous) Shoria – the southwestern part and Kuznetsk Depression – the central part of the Kemerovo region. Kuznetsk Alatau – the biggest mountain system of the region. The total length exceeds 500 km. The highest point – Amzas-Taskyl (Big Tooth) – 2,178 6 meters above sea level. The main ridge and few spurs are covered with eternal snowfields on the northern slopes, with surviving mountain tundra and alpine flora. There are vast territories covered with preserved dark coniferous and leaf forests. Salair Ridge is an ancient chain of mountains. It stretches from the South to the North for about 300 meterswith breadth of about 15-40 km. The ridge is smooth; its average altitude reaches 400 meters above sea level. Gorrnaya (Mountainous) Shoria is also called Siberian Switzerland for its ski resorts, alpine meadows and incredibly fresh air.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prospectus Front and Back 2016
    IMPORTANT NOTICE THE PROSPECTUS (THE “PROSPECTUS”) FOLLOWING THIS PAGE MAY ONLY BE DISTRIBUTED TO PERSONS WHO ARE EITHER (1) QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS (“QIBs”) WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 144A (“RULE 144A”) UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), OR (2) NON-U.S. PERSONS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STAT ES WITHIN THE MEANING OF REGULATION S (“REGULATION S”) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT. IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the Prospectus following this page, and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of this document. In accessing the Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. RESTRICTIONS: NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITAT ION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THE NOTES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. ANY NOTE TO BE ISSUED HAS NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, OR WITH ANY SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OR OTHER JURISDICTION. THE NOTES MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY WITHIN THE UNITED STAT ES OR TO, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OR BENEFIT OF, U.S. PERSONS (AS DEFINED IN REGULATION S) EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL SECURITIES LAWS.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Adcmemorial.Org Alternative Report on the Russian Federation's
    adcmemorial.org Alternative Report on the Russian Federation’s Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Connection with the Consideration of the Sixth Periodic State Report (2016) by the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights For the Pre-Sessional Working Group of the 60th Session of the CESCR 27 February – 3 March 2017 года The Russian Federation: Violation of the Economic and Social Rights of Roma and Indigenous Minorities; Employment Discrimination against Vulnerable Groups 1 CONTENTS PREAMBLE……………………………………………………………………………………………….3 VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF ROMA AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES……………………….4 Problem: demolition of housing in dense Roma settlements, eviction of residents, deprivation of access to resources………………………………………………………………….4 Problem: violation of the rights of Roma children to education – segregation into separate “Roma” classes and schools, difficulties accessing preschool education, lack of educational opportunities for people who left or never attended school at all for various reasons………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Problem: absence of a comprehensive government strategy to overcome structural discrimination of the Roma population in the Russian Federation……………………………7 Problem: violation of the economic, social and cultural rights of indigenous peoples – seizure of territories where these peoples traditionally live and maintain their households by mining and oil and gas companies; removal of self-government bodies of indigenous peoples; repression of activists and employees of social organizations, including the fabrication of criminal cases………………………………………………………………………….7 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION OF VULNERABLE GROUPS……………………………….11 Problem: the existence of the “list of professions banned for women” results in employment discrimination against women; the Russian Federation is not implementing the recommendations and rulings of international institutions (CEDAW) to abolish this list.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Givetian Rugosas of the East Part of Salair N.V
    Bulletin of the Томsк Pоlytеchnic University. 2007. V. 311. № 1 13. Determinant of freshwater seaweed of the USSR. – Moscow: Pros (Institute of Geology and Gas of Academy of Science of the USSR. vescheniye, 1953. – Issue 2. – 653 p. – Issue 632). 14. Kiryanov V.V. To a question on the nature of some Early Cambrian 17. Microfossils of Precambrian of the USSR / T.V. Yankauskas, spherumorphic acritarchs // Pressing questions of modern paleoal N.S. Mikhaylova, T.N. German et al. – Leningrad: Nauka. – 1989. gology. – Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1986. – P. 40–45. – 190 p. 15. Life of plants. Seaweed. Lichens / Edited by M.M. Gollerbakh. – 18. Butterfield N.J. Macroevolution and macroecology through deep ti Moscow: Prosvescheniye, 1977. – V. 3. – 487 p. me // Paleontology. – 2007. – V. 50. – P. 1. – P. 41–55. 16. German T.N., Timofeev B.V. Eosolenides – a new group of proble matic organisms of Late Precambrian // Problematics of Late Pre cambrian and Paleozoic. – Novosibirsk: Science, 1985. – P. 9–15. Received on 30.10.2006 UDC 56:551.73 (571.55+235.222) EARLY GIVETIAN RUGOSAS OF THE EAST PART OF SALAIR N.V. Gumerova Tomsk Politechnic University Email: [email protected] The rugosa complexes of several cuts of the Mamontovskiy and Safonovskiy horizons of Salair have been selected and monographically described. Descriptions of deposits are given and their age is specified by the rugosa complexes. Monographic descriptions and photos of fauna are enclosed. Rugosa complexes of Mamontovskiy and Safonov brachiopods and rugosas, they can be attributed to the skiy horizons have been studied by the author during the Saphonovskiy horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Diversification Factors of Old Industrial Regions\' Economy and Transition to the Innovative Development
    E3S Web of Conferences 21, 04022 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20172104022 The Second International Innovative Mining Symposium Some Diversification Factors of Old Industrial Regions’ Economy and Transition to the Innovative Development Olga Tabashnikova1 1 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Kemerovo Institute (branch), 650992 Kemerovo, Kuznetskiy Av. 39, Russia Abstract. The article presents the grounds for the necessity to diversify the mono-economy of old industrial regions and its transition to the innovative development based on the interaction of small and large businesses with the support of municipal, regional and governmental authorities. The examples of the world practice in state regulation of depressed territories of old industrial type and the participation of multinational corporations in their modernization are given. The role of business groups in the diversification of the Kemerovo region economy is described, as well as the importance of supporting this process by the governmental authorities. 1 Introduction The need to diversify the mono-profile (mono-product, mono-industrial) economy of old industrial regions, including the Kemerovo Region, is due to the objective requirement of their sustainable development and increase of social and economic parameters of the terri- torial management system. One of the important factors of this process is the effective in- teraction of small and large business. However, in modern economy, when the existing economic, production, and other links and mechanisms lose their importance and new ones are just being established, to create such interaction and ensure its development the pur- poseful efforts of the authorities on federal, regional and municipal levels are necessary. 2 Materials and Methods It should be noted that there is no "exact" (single, universal) definition of the term "old in- dustrial region", despite the fact that many scientists have paid attention to this phenome- non during the past twenty five years in Russia [1-5].
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    2015 Annual Report & Accounts MAKING THE WORLD STRONGER Report This annual report (“the Report”) presents the results for EVRAZ plc and its subsidiaries for 2015, divided into segments: Steel, Steel North America and Coal. It details the Group’s operational and financial results and corporate social responsibility activities in 2015. The Report has been prepared in accordance with the information disclosure requirements of the United Kingdom and the Financial Conduct Authority: Č the Companies Act 2006; Č the Listing Rules; Č the Disclosure and Transparency Rules; Č Competition and Market Authority Order. The Report has also been prepared on the basis of the International Integrated Reporting Framework and the GRI G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines and contains elements of an integrated and a sustainability report. It has been approved by the Board of Directors. The main theme of the Report is value creation, as detailed in the EVRAZ Business Model section. On 13 April 2015, Evraz Highveld Steel and Vanadium Ltd. (“EHS”) implemented a business rescue procedure and the regulator appointed an external business rescue practitioner to EHS. As of 13 April 2015, control over EHS passed to the business rescue practitioner, and EVRAZ has no influence over the executives or management of EHS and does not have ongoing access to information about its current activities. The Group has relinquished control over and deconsolidated EHS. Information about EHS for the period to 13 April 2015 was disclosed in corresponding disclosure announcements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Indutry of Russia in 1998
    THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF RUSSIA By Richard M. Levine Russia extends over more than 75% of the territory of the According to the Minister of Natural Resources, Russia will former Soviet Union (FSU) and accordingly possesses a large not begin to replenish diminishing reserves until the period from percentage of the FSU’s mineral resources. Russia was a major 2003 to 2005, at the earliest. Although some positive trends mineral producer, accounting for a large percentage of the were appearing during the 1996-97 period, the financial crisis in FSU’s production of a range of mineral products, including 1998 set the geological sector back several years as the minimal aluminum, bauxite, cobalt, coal, diamonds, mica, natural gas, funding that had been available for exploration decreased nickel, oil, platinum-group metals, tin, and a host of other further. In 1998, 74% of all geologic prospecting was for oil metals, industrial minerals, and mineral fuels. Still, Russia was and gas (Interfax Mining and Metals Report, 1999n; Novikov significantly import-dependent on a number of mineral products, and Yastrzhembskiy, 1999). including alumina, bauxite, chromite, manganese, and titanium Lack of funding caused a deterioration of capital stock at and zirconium ores. The most significant regions of the country mining enterprises. At the majority of mining enterprises, there for metal mining were East Siberia (cobalt, copper, lead, nickel, was a sharp decrease in production indicators. As a result, in the columbium, platinum-group metals, tungsten, and zinc), the last 7 years more than 20 million metric tons (Mt) of capacity Kola Peninsula (cobalt, copper, nickel, columbium, rare-earth has been decommissioned at iron ore mining enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Argus Russian Coal
    Argus Russian Coal Issue 17-36 | Monday 9 October 2017 MARKET COmmENTARY PRICES Turkey lifts coal imports from Russia Russian coal prices $/t Turkey increased receipts of Russian thermal coal by 9pc on Delivery basis NAR kcal/kg Delivery period 6 Oct ± 29 Sep the year in January-August, to 7.79mn t, according to data fob Baltic ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 86.97 -0.20 from statistics agency Tuik, amid higher demand from utili- fob Black Sea ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 90.63 -0.25 ties and households. Russian material replaced supplies from cif Marmara* 6,000 Nov 17 100.33 0.33 South Africa, which redirected part of shipments to more fob Vostochny 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 100.00 1.00 profitable markets in Asia-Pacific this year. fob Vostochny 5,500 Nov-Dec 17 87.0 0 1.75 *assessment of Russian and non-Russian coal In August Russian coal receipts rose to over 1.26mn t, up by 15pc on the year and by around 19pc on the month. Russian coal prices $/t This year demand for sized Russian coal is higher com- Delivery basis NAR kcal/kg Delivery period Low High pared with last year because of colder winter weather in 2016-2017, a Russian supplier says. Demand for coal fines fob Baltic ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 85.25 88.00 fob Black Sea ports 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 89.50 91.00 from utilities has also risen amid the launch of new coal- fob Vostochny 6,000 Nov-Dec 17 100.00 100.00 fired capacity, the source adds.
    [Show full text]
  • Is It Possible to Sustain Resource-Driven Region?
    Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Аssets Engineering. 2020. V. 331. 11. 208–216 Kiriyanova L.G. Mining and tourism: is it possible to sustain resource-driven region? UDC 332 MINING AND TOURISM: IS IT POSSIBLE TO SUSTAIN RESOURCE-DRIVEN REGION? Liliya G. Kiriyanova, [email protected] National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, 30, Lenin avenue, Tomsk, 634050, Russia. Dependence of regional economy on resource-driven path is one of methodological and regional policy challenges. It is crucial to under- stand how to stimulate new paths creation in locked-in resource-driven regions. This paper highlights that new path can appear not only in diversified regional economy by intercrossing innovations or by branching process to related technological spheres. It is shown that tech- nological and infrastructure connectivity is not the only possible way for old industries to create a new one. Mining and tourism are often debated as sectors with conflict interests which never can co-exist in one region. In this article we offer the model to explain stages, inter- play between main agents of changes, mechanisms and regional assets in the emergence of the tourism industry in mining region in Western Siberia, Russia. The key findings reveal synergy of mining and tourism in region sustainability. It is demonstrated that financial resources, human resources, networks, access to external resources, lobbing resources of the «coal» path can serve critical inputs to create a «tourism» one. Economic interests and resources of private actors mainstreamed and supported by strategic interests of the pub- lic policy may create a new path. Model of unrelated diversification provides long-term sustainable development of the region and can be used in other Russian regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Lectures on the Prevention of Encephalitis Epidemics in Siberia
    SIBERIAN RESEARCH | 1 ç03è | 2020 http://doi.org/10.33384/26587270.2020.01.006e SIX LECTURES ON THE PREVENTION OF ENCEPHALITIS EPIDEMICS IN SIBERIA Lev G. Goldfarb Annotation. àis review summarizes the work of large teams of researchers to prevent two separate encephalitis epidemics in Siberia. àe >rst three lectures sum up an extensive eåort to study and control the Tick-borne enceph- alitis (TBE) epidemic in the Kemerovo region of Western Siberia. àe study has helped to create a mathematical model that details the TBE epidemic process and oåers a quantitative approach to the development of strategies for preventing TBE epidemics. Ten-year eåort to combat TBE in the Kemerovo region led to a signi>cant and sustained reduction in TBE morbidity and mortality. Fißy years aßer completion of this work, the proposed strategy has not been tested in other endemic regions, although the incidence of TBE worldwide has almost doubled, taking hundreds of lives and causing disability in thousands. àe second disease described here is Viliuisk encephalomyelitis (VEM), >rst discovered 150 years ago in a small rural population of Eastern Siberia. àe disease later spread to densely populated areas of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), reaching epidemic proportions. àe three lectures on VEM provide an overview of multi-year studies on clinical presentation, neuropathology, pathogenesis, etiology, and epidemiology of VEM. We report here for the >rst time how a prolonged hospitalization of VEM patients during the acute and subacute phases of the disease prevent- ed transmission to susceptible individuals in their families and communities, which has helped to put an end to the further spread of this deadly disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Safety in the Framework of Sustainable Development of the Region (On the Example of the Siberian Federal District)
    E3S Web of Conferences 296, 04002 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129604002 ESMGT 2021 Environmental safety in the framework of sustainable development of the region (on the example of the Siberian Federal District) E.A. Zhidkova1,*, and I.A. Dymova2 1Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russia 2T. F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University Abstract. A statistical analysis of public opinion on environmental safety issues was carried out. The Siberian Federal District was chosen as the object of the study. Special attention is paid to the development of environmental safety in the Krasnoyarsk Territory and the Kemerovo Region (Kuzbass). The main criterion for determining the coordinates of "critical" points was the results of a social survey conducted by the Special Communications and Information Service of the Federal Security Service of Russia. The reasons for the negative impact on the state of the environment of the Siberian Federal District are revealed. It is established that when preventive measures are not so effective to maintain a high level of environmental safety, the compensation of environmental damage can pass through the organization of the institute of environmental insurance. 1 Introduction Theory and practice of sustainable development in Russia is associated with indicators of economic growth. Sustainable development is interpreted in a broader aspect at the international level and is associated not only with the economic phenomena implementation, but also with environmental and social processes. Currently, due to the ongoing scientific and technological breakthroughs, there is a limit to the use of the Russian raw-materials export model of development. On the one hand, there is a decrease in resources of producing fields, leading to a decline in economic growth, and, on the other hand, the expansion of exploration and extraction of minerals causes damage to the environment, reducing environmental safety level.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • State Support of Investment, Innovation and Production Activities 3
    The investment policy of the Kemerovo Region has the following priorities: creating a favourable investment climate; improving regional legislation on investment and innovation; creating an investment infrastructure and new investment sites; developing a transport infrastructure; establishing intersectoral and territorial clusters; making a better use of state support to investment activity; strengthening measures to attract investment in high tech projects; using pension, insurance and mutual funds to imple- ment major infrastructural projects; developing public-private partnerships; providing information and staff support to investment projects; and eliminating administrative barriers and minimising corruption risks. An excerpt from the Investment Memorandum of the Kemerovo Region (adopted by the Kemerovo Region Administration Board, Regulation No. 1187-r of 30 December 2011) 1 Kemerovo Region Investment Profile Contents Foreword by Aman Tuleyev, Governor of the Kemerovo Region ..................................................................................... 4 Section 1. Introduction ......................................................................... 6 1.1. Geography ..................................................................... 6 1.2. Administrative and territorial divisions ................. 6 Section 2. Investment Policy and Investment Potential ......... 8 2.1. Investment strategy .................................................... 8 2.2. Investment priorities ............................................... 8 2.3.
    [Show full text]