DOCSLIB.ORG

DAVID RICARDO John E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DAVID RICARDO John E Great Thinkers in Economics Series Series Editor: A.P. Thirlwall is Professor of Applied Economics, University of Kent, UK. Great Thinkers in Economics is designed to illuminate the economics of some of the great historical and contemporary economists by exploring the interactions between their lives and work, and the events surrounding them. The books are brief and written in a style that makes them not only of interest to professional economists but also intelligible for students of economics and the interested lay person. Titles include: Esben Sloth Anderson JOSEPH A. SCHUMPETER William J. Barber GUNNAR MYRDAL Paul Davidson JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES Gordon Fletcher DENNIS ROBERTSON Peter D. Groenewegen ALFRED MARSHALL G.C. Harcourt and Prue Kerr JOAN ROBINSON Gavin Kennedy ADAM SMITH John E. King DAVID RICARDO John E. King NICHOLAS KALDOR Julio Lopez and Michaël Assous MICHAL KALECKI Paul Mosley and Barbara Ingham SIR ARTHUR LEWIS Alessandro Roncaglia PIERO SRAFFA James Ronald Stanfield and Jacqueline Bloom Stanfield JOHN KENNETH GALBRAITH Michael Szenberg and Lall Ramrattan FRANCO MODIGLIANI Forthcoming titles include: Nahid Aslanbeigui and Guy Oakes ARTHUR C.PIGOU Robert Dimand JAMES TOBIN Albert Jolink JAN TINBERGEN Warren Young and Esteban Perez ROY HARROD Great Thinkers in Economics Series Standing Order ISBN 978–1–403–98555–2 (Hardback) 978–1–403–98556–9 (Paperback) (outside North America only) You can receive future titles in this series as they are published by placing a standing order. Please contact your bookseller or, in case of difficulty, write to us at the address below with your name and address, the title of the series and one of the ISBNs quoted above. Customer Services Department, Macmillan Distribution Ltd, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS, England, UK David Ricardo John E. King © John E. King 2013 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2013 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978–0–230–28996–3 This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Typeset by MPS Limited, Chennai, India. Contents Preface and Acknowledgements vii 1 The Life and Times of David Ricardo 1 1.1 The Importance of Ricardo 1 1.2 Ricardo’s Life 2 1.3 Ricardo’s England: The Economy 12 1.4 Ricardo’s England: Society and Politics 16 2 Ricardo’s Vision 29 2.1 Philosophy, History, Society 29 2.2 Ricardo’s Method and Style 34 2.3 Ricardo’s Politics 42 2.4 Ricardo’s Works 49 Appendix: The Principles 54 3 Value and Distribution 56 3.1 Ricardo’s Problem 56 3.2 Profits and Rent 58 3.3 Wages 69 3.4 The Theory of Value 72 4 International Trade 81 4.1 The Theory of Comparative Advantage 82 4.2 Ricardo on the Corn Laws 88 4.3 Ricardo and His Critics 93 4.4 The Politics of Trade 100 4.5 Ricardo’s Trade Theory in the Twenty- first Century 104 5 Ricardo’s Macroeconomics 107 5.1 Growth and the Stationary State 108 5.2 ‘Say’s Law’ 112 5.3 Money and Banking 120 5.4 ‘On Machinery’ 126 6 Ricardo on Economic Policy 132 6.1 Fiscal Policy 133 6.2 Monetary Policy 142 6.3 Social Policy, Labour and the Poor 151 6.4 Ricardo, Laissez- faire and Classical Liberalism 157 v vi Contents 7 Editors and Critics 160 7.1 The First two Generations: 1823– 1870 161 7.2 Ricardo and the ‘Marginalist Revolution’: 1870– 1936 170 7.3 Ricardo and the ‘Keynesian Revolution’: 1936– 1975 177 7.4 Ricardo in the Age of Neoliberalism: After 1975 183 8 The Three Ricardos 186 8.1 The Marxian Ricardo 186 8.2 The Neoclassical Ricardo: From Marshall to Hollander 194 8.3 Piero Sraffa’s Ricardo 201 8.4 Ricardo’s Legacy 209 Notes 213 Bibliography 217 Name Index 248 Subject Index 255 Preface and Acknowledgements First of all I must thank the series editor, A.P. (Tony) Thirlwall, for commis- sioning this book and thereby allowing me to return to early nineteenth- century political economy after spending the last two decades working on the history of much more recent economic ideas. He also made many helpful suggestions and criticisms. I am grateful to Michael McLure and Greg Moore for bibliographic advice, and to Christian Gehrke, Heinz Kurz, Terry Peach and Matthew Smith for stimulating conversations and (in some cases) arguments over various aspects of Ricardo’s political economy. Thanks are due especially to Michael Schneider for reading the entire manuscript and making incisive comments. I have a larger debt to Michael, who introduced me to the history of economic thought many years ago and convinced me that Marx was not the only dead econo- mist who deserved to be taken seriously. I am also grateful to the Dead Economists’ Society, better known as the History of Economic Thought Society of Australia (HETSA), for 25 years of annual conferences, with hardly a single bad paper at any of them. My greatest thanks must go to Mike Howard, from whom I have learned so much over so many years. Mike read the entire manuscript and improved it greatly. But the usual disclaimer applies, of course. A note on sources: almost all references to Ricardo come from the eleven- volume Works and Correspondence, edited by Piero Sraffa (with the assistance of Maurice Dobb) and published by Cambridge University Press between 1951 and 1955 (volume XI was delayed until 1973). They are cited by volume: thus ‘I, p. 30’ refers to p. 30 of the Principles. The same method of citation has been used for Sraffa’s (copious) editorial notes, which are often (but not always) in lower- case Roman numerals: thus ‘I, p. xxx’ refers to p. xxx of his ‘Introduction’ to the Principles, but ‘IV, pp. 3– 8’ refers to his editorial notes on pp. 3– 8 of volume IV of the Works and Correspondence. It should always be clear from the context whether it is Ricardo or his editor who is being cited. A relatively small number of manuscripts and letters have come to light since the completion of the Cambridge University Press edition. In each case they are attributed to the editor; full citations are given in the References. JOHN E. KING vii This page intentionally left blank 1 The Life and Times of David Ricardo 1.1 The Importance of Ricardo My previous contribution to this series was devoted to Nicholas Kaldor ( 1908– 1986), a man with a very high opinion of David Ricardo as an economic theorist, even though he was never himself in any sense a Ricardian. Kaldor once described Ricardo’s Principles as being ‘generally regarded as the basis of modern economics’ (Kaldor 1978, p. 183). As he wrote in 1982, with reference to Keynes’s General Theory: ‘It will rank as one of the top 5 classics in the field – of comparable importance to Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations, Ricardo’s Principles, Marx’s Das Kapital and Alfred Marshall’s Principles of Economics’ (Kaldor 1982, p. 259). Half a century earlier, Claud Guillebaud (1927, p. 16) went even further, describing Ricardo as ‘perhaps the greatest intellect which has turned to economic science’. If this is a contentious assessment, it is probably more generally accepted that ‘no figure in the history of economics has been more controversial than Ricardo’ (Whitaker 1989, p. 492).1 Ironically, one area of controversy concerning Ricardo is precisely the extent of his influence. According to the most authoritative recent history of classical political economy, by Dennis O’Brien, ‘the full Ricardian apparatus attracted hardly any disciples … By 1830– 1 Ricardian value theory had effectively disappeared … Only in the case of Ricardo’s treatment of comparative advantage do we really find an unbroken continuation, development, and refinement of his work’. And then he continues: But having said all this it is vital to be clear about one thing. Though the influence of Ricardo has been shown to have been extremely limited, it was, for the further development of Classical economics, 1 2 David Ricardo entirely necessary to discuss his system. For his tremendous intel- lectual vitality had burnt deep scars onto the Classical- economic consciousness.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • “Bad” Greed from the Enlightenment to Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929)1 Erik S
    real-world economics review, issue no. 63 subscribe for free Civilizing capitalism: “good” and “bad” greed from the enlightenment to Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929)1 Erik S. Reinert [Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia and Norway] Copyright: Erik S. Reinert, 2013 You may post comments on this paper at http://rwer.wordpress.com/2013/03/25/rwer-issue-63/ As we look over the country today we see two classes of people. The excessively rich and the abject poor, and between them is a gulf ever deepening, ever widening, and the ranks of the poor are continually being recruited from a third class, the well-to-do, which class is rapidly disappearing and being absorbed by the very poor. Milford Wriarson Howard (1862-1937), in The American Plutocracy, 1895. This paper argues for important similarities between today’s economic situation and the picture painted above by Milford Howard, a member of the US Senate at the time he wrote The American Plutocracy. This was the time, the 1880s and 1890s, when a combination of Manchester Liberalism – a logical extension of Ricardian economics – and Social Darwinism – promoted by the exceedingly influential UK philosopher Herbert Spencer – threatened completely to take over economic thought and policy on both sides of the Atlantic. At the same time, the latter half of the 19th century was marred by financial crises and social unrest. The national cycles of boom and bust were not as globally synchronized as they later became, but they were frequent both in Europe and in the United States. Activist reformer Ida Tarbell probably exaggerated when she recalled that in the US “the eighties dripped with blood”, but a growing gulf between a small and opulent group of bankers and industrialists produced social unrest and bloody labour struggles.
    [Show full text]
  • New Working Papers Series, Entitled “Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics”
    Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics no. 74 the other canon foundation, Norway Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance CONTACT: Rainer Kattel, [email protected]; Wolfgang Drechsler, [email protected]; Erik S. Reinert, [email protected] 80 Economic Bestsellers before 1850: A Fresh Look at the History of Economic Thought Erik S. Reinert, Kenneth Carpenter, Fernanda A. Reinert, Sophus A. Reinert* MAY 2017 * E. Reinert, Tallinn University of Technology & The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; K. Car- penter, former librarian, Harvard University; F. Reinert, The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; S. Reinert, Harvard Business School. The authors are grateful to Dr. Debra Wallace, Managing Director, Baker Library Services and, Laura Linard, Director of Baker Library Special Collections, at Harvard Business School, where the Historical Collection now houses what was once the Kress Library, for their cooperation in this venture. Above all our thanks go to Olga Mikheeva at Tallinn University of Technology for her very efficient research assistance. Antiquarian book dealers often have more information on economics books than do academics, and our thanks go to Wilhelm Hohmann in Stuttgart, Robert H. Rubin in Brookline MA, Elvira Tasbach in Berlin, and, above all, to Ian Smith in London. We are also grateful for advice from Richard van den Berg, Francesco Boldizzoni, Patrick O’Brien, Alexandre Mendes Cunha, Bertram Schefold and Arild Sæther. Corresponding author [email protected] The core and backbone of this publication consists of the meticulous work of Kenneth Carpenter, librarian of the Kress Library at Harvard Busi- ness School starting in 1968 and later Assistant Director for Research Resources in the Harvard University Library and the Harvard College 1 Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Anwar Shaikh and Isabella Weber the U.S.-China Trade Balance and The
    Anwar Shaikh and Isabella Weber The U.S.-China Trade Balance and the Theory of Free Trade: Debunking the Currency Manipulation Argument May 2018; revised December 2019 Working Paper 05/2018 Department of Economics The New School for Social Research The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the New School for Social Research. © 2018 by Anwar Shaikh and Isabella Weber. All rights reserved. Short sections of text may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit is given to the source. Anwar Shaikh The New School for Social Research Department of Economics Isabella Weber* University of Massachusetts Amherst Department of Economics The U.S.-China Trade Imbalance and the Theory of Free Trade: Debunking the Currency Manipulation Argument Abstract The U.S.-China trade imbalance is commonly attributed to a Chinese policy of currency manipulation. However, empirical studies failed to reach consensus on the degree and kind of RMB misalignment. We argue that this is not a consequence of poor measurement but of theory. At the most abstract level the conventional principle of comparative cost advantage suggests real exchange rates will adjust so as to balance trade. Therefore, the persistence of trade imbalances tends to be interpreted as arising from currency manipulation facilitated by foreign exchange interventions. By way of contrast, the absolute cost theory provided by Smith and Harrod theory explains trade imbalances as the outcome of free trade among nations that have unequal real costs. We argue that a disparity in real costs is the root cause of the U.S.-China trade imbalance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to the Whole Produce of Labour
    1RNIA SAN DIEGO THE EIGHT TO THE WHOLE PRODUCE OF LABOUR THE EIGHT TO THE WHOLE PBODUCE OF LABOUK THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE THEORY OF LABOUR'S CLAIM TO THE WHOLE PRODUCT OF INDUSTRY BY DK. ANTON MENGEK PROFESSOR OF JURISPRUDENCE IN THE UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA TRANSLATED BY M. E. TANNER WITH AN INTRODUCTION AND BIBLIOGRAPHY BY H. S. FOXWELL, M.A. PROFESSOR OF ECONOMICS AT UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON ; LECTURER AND LATE FELLOW OF ST. JOHN'S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE Hontion MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED NEW YORK: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1899 A II rights reserved INTRODUCTION DR. ANTON MENGER'S remarkable study of the cardinal Dr doctrine of revolutionary socialism, now for the first W time published in English, has long enjoyed a wide reputation on the Continent; and English students of social philosophy, whether or not they are familiar with the original, will welcome its appearance in this trans- lation. The interest and importance of the subject will not be disputed, either by the opponents or the advocates of socialism ; and those who know how exceptionally Dr. Menger is qualified for work of this kind, by his juristic eminence, and his profound know- ledge of socialistic literature, will not need to be told that it has been executed with singular vigour and ability. Hitherto, perhaps because it was not generally accessible to English readers, the book has not received in this country the notice that it has met with elsewhere. Yet there are reasons why it should be of peculiar interest to English economists. The particular method of criticism adopted by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • David Ricardo's Contribution to the Constitution of The
    David Ricardo’s Contribution to the Constitution of the Canon of Ricardian Economics: A Reconsideration of 1970’s Interpretations of the 1815 Debate André Lapidus, Nathalie Sigot To cite this version: André Lapidus, Nathalie Sigot. David Ricardo’s Contribution to the Constitution of the Canon of Ricardian Economics: A Reconsideration of 1970’s Interpretations of the 1815 Debate. Evelyn L. Forget and Sandra Peart. Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, Routledge, pp.270-289, 2001. hal-00344895 HAL Id: hal-00344895 https://hal-paris1.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00344895 Submitted on 6 Dec 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. David Ricardo’s Contribution to the Constitution of the Canon of Ricardian Economics: A Reconsideration of 1970’s Interpretations of the 1815 Debate André Lapidus * Nathalie Sigot * In Evelyn L. Forget and Sandra Peart (eds), Reflections on the Classical Canon in Economics, London and New York: Routledge, 2001 * Centre d’Histoire de la Pensée Economique, University of Paris I Panthéon - Sorbonne - 106, bd de l’Hôpital - 75647 Paris Cedex 13 - France. E-mails: [email protected] and [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Economic Thought Isaac Ilych Rubin
    H. H. P y B M H A History of Economic Thought MCTOPMJI. by 3K0H0MMHECK0R Isaac Ilych Rubin MblC/IM Translated and edited by Donald Filtzei K30AHHE TPETbS co Bioporo aono^HEHHoro Poc/dapimatHHQio Ytewto Coatma Afterword tonyu&HO 4 xanetmu jr*t6noto MCOOUM 9M tyso* by Catherine Colliot-Thelene LINKS rOCyflAPCTBEHHOE H3^ATE^bCTBO MOCKBA * 1 9 2 9 * /lEHHHfPAJl Isaac Ilych Rubin was born in Russia in 1886 In 1905 he became an active participant in the 75 Russian revolutionary movement After the Bolshevik seizure of power he worked as a .^7/3 professor of Marxist economics and in 1926 became research associate at the Marx-Engels Institute In 1930 he was airested. An official Soviet philosopher wrote that: 'The followers First published as htoriya ekonomicheskoi of Rubin and. the Menshevizing Idealists. mydi (Gosizdat RSFSR) This translation treated Marx's revolutionary method in the taken, with the permission of the New York spirit.,, of Hegelianism The Communist Public Library, from a copy of the second Party has smashed these trends alien to Marx- printing of the second, revised Russian edition ism'. (Rosenthal, quoted by Rornan Rozdolsky (1929) in that library's possession in The Making of Marx's Capital?) Rubin was Ihis edition first published in 1979 by imprisoned, accused of belonging to an organi- Ink Links Ltd., zation that never existed, forced to 'confess' to 271, Kentish Town Road participating in events that never took place, London NW5 2JS and finally removed from among the living Between 1924 and 1930 Rubin completed Translation
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Hodgskin and Economic Progress; a Radical Reconstruction of His Endogenous Growth Theory
    THOMAS HODGSKIN AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS; A RADICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF HIS ENDOGENOUS GROWTH THEORY F.G. Day PhD 2009 THOMAS HODGSKIN AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS; A RADICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF HIS ENDOGENOUS GROWTH THEORY Frederick George Day A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Economics The Manchester Metropolitan University June 2009 1 Declaration I confirm that no part of this thesis has been submitted for the award of a qualification at this or any other university. 2 Abstract By means of a close reading of early 19th century economic works, and by reconstructing aspects of Thomas Hodgskin‘s political economy, this thesis presents an exposition of those parts of his work that contributed to his position on growth. Rather than concentrating on his ideas on capital, we have centred on his concept of political economy as a science concerned with labour as the sole creator of wealth. We present his political economy as having labour as its focal point within a hypothetical pure market economy. From here he sought a foundation to economic growth derived from human action rather than capital or other material circumstances. Hodgskin saw human knowledge and the use of technology as the starting point that would, from his perspective, lead inevitably to those economic conditions that produce improvements in economic welfare and by doing so allow for an increase in population. In order to demonstrate his ideas on growth, we reconstruct his concepts of what was natural and artificial to equate to the modern notions of endogenous and exogenous.
    [Show full text]
  • Coasean Fictions: Law and Economics Revisited
    Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 5 Issue 2 Article 28 May 2007 Coasean Fictions: Law and Economics Revisited Alejandro Nadal Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj Recommended Citation Nadal, Alejandro (2007) "Coasean Fictions: Law and Economics Revisited," Seattle Journal for Social Justice: Vol. 5 : Iss. 2 , Article 28. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/sjsj/vol5/iss2/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications and Programs at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Seattle Journal for Social Justice by an authorized editor of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 569 Coasean Fictions: Law and Economics Revisited Alejandro Nadal1 After the 1960s, a strong academic movement developed in the United States around the idea that the study of the law, as well as legal practice, could be strengthened through economic analysis.2 This trend was started through the works of R.H. Coase and Guido Calabresi, and grew with later developments introduced by Richard Posner and Robert D. Cooter, as well as Gary Becker.3 Law and Economics (L&E) is the name given to the application of modern economics to legal analysis and practice. Proponents of L&E have portrayed the movement as improving clarity and logic in legal analysis, and even as a tool to modify the conceptual categories used by lawyers and courts to think about
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Damnation of Economics
    Notes 1. The Damnation of Economics 1. One example of vice-regal patronage of anti-economics is Canada’s ‘Governor General’s Award for Non-Fiction’. In 1995 this honour was bestowed upon John Raulston Saul’s anti-economic polemic The Unconscious Civilization (published in 1996). A taste of Saul’s wisdom: ‘Over the last quarter-century economics has raised itself to the level of a scientific profession and more or less foisted a Nobel Prize in its own honour onto the Nobel committee thanks to annual financing from a bank. Yet over the same 25 years, economics has been spectacularly unsuc- cessful in its attempts to apply its models and theories to the reality of our civili- sation’ (Saul 1996, p. 4). See Pusey (1991) and Cox (1995) for examples of patronage of anti-economics by Research Councils and Broadcasting Corporations. 2. Another example of economists’ ‘stillness’: the economists of 1860 did not join the numerous editorial rebukes of Ruskin’s anti-economics tracts (Anthony, 1983). 3. The anti-economist is not to be contrasted with the economist. An economist (that is, a person with a specialist knowledge of economics) may be an anti- economist. The true obverse of anti-economist is ‘philo-economist’: someone who holds that economics is a boon. 4. One may think of economics as a disease (as the anti-economist does), or one may think of economics as diseased. Mark Blaug: ‘Modern economics is “sick” . To para- phrase the title of a popular British musical: “No Reality, Please. We’re Economists”’ (Blaug 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unsolved Problem of Economic Crisis As a Turning Point of Marxs
    The Unsolved Problem of Economic Crisis as a Turning Point of Marx’s Critique of Political Economy, 1844-45 Timm Graßmann Abstract: With the continuing publication of the complete works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels （Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe, MEGA）, a bulk of new material concerning Marx’s studies of economic crises has been made available-with further releases expected to follow. These publications have revealed Marx’s enormous efforts to examine in detail every economic cri- sis through which he lived. The most prominent examples are the three Books of Crisis（ Kris- enhefte）, which he compiled in 1857-58 amidst the first truly global economic crisis. This paper sets out to, first, provide an overview of new MEGA-texts regarding Marx’s studies of contemporaneous 19th century revulsions. In the main part, a closer look will be taken at the origin of Marx’s crisis studies in the 1840s. A comparison between his notes on James Mill’s Elements of Political Economy, written in the Paris Notebooks（ 1844）, and his excerpts from John Stuart Mill’s Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, taken in his Manchester Notebooks（ 1845）, reveals Marx’s changing stance on classical political econo- my’s ‘general glut controversy,’ i.e., the debate over the（ im）possibility of overproduction cri- ses in commodity-producing societies. In between his stays in Paris and Manchester, Marx took extensive notes on the works of Simonde de Sismondi in his Brussels Notebooks （1845）, which played a major role in his break from anthropological-essentialist thinking. JEL classification numbers: B 00, B 51, E 32.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis 2015 Version 97 Vale
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONOMICAS Y EMPRESARIALES Departamento de Historia e Instituciones Económicas I TESIS DOCTORAL Fundamentos teóricos de la controversia entre Hayek y Keynes. Dos visiones acerca del orden económico y la historia MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Pablo Losoviz Adaui Director Fernando Méndez Ibisate Madrid, 2017 © Pablo Losoviz Adaui, 2015 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y EMPRESARIALES DEPARTAMENTO DE HISTORIA E INSTITUCIONES ECONÓMICAS I FUNDAMENTOS TEÓRICOS DE LA CONTROVERSIA ENTRE HAYEK Y KEYNES. DOS VISIONES ACERCA DEL ORDEN ECONÓMICO Y LA HISTORIA. TESIS DOCTORAL DE: PABLO LOSOVIZ ADAUI DIRIGIDA POR: FERNANDO MÉNDEZ IBISATE MADRID, 2015 © Pablo Losoviz Adaui, 2015. Agradecimientos y dedicatorias. En primer lugar deseo agradecer a mi tutor de Tesis, D. Fernando Méndez Ibisate, el cual al plantearle que deseaba realizar una investigación sobre el ciclo económico me sugirió que profundizara sobre el debate sostenido entre F. A. Hayek y J. M. Keynes. Sin duda que el provecho que he obtenido a lo largo de estos años de investigación abarca mucho más que simplemente el fenómeno del ciclo y solo espero que, aunque sea en cierta medida, en este trabajo de investigación haya quedado reflejado. En varios de los puntos de esta tesis sin mencionar explícitamente el problema de las crisis y fluctuaciones económicas el lector podrá observar sugerencias sobre el mismo de suma importancia. Realmente lo que se ha intentado es situar el debate entre Hayek y Keynes dentro de la órbita de la historia del pensamiento económico y en particular sobre la percepción filosófica y metodológica que juega la concepción de la Historia en ambos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scientific Rationality of Early Statistics, 1833–1877
    The Scientific Rationality of Early Statistics, 1833–1877 Yasuhiro Okazawa St Catharine’s College This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. November 2018 Declaration Declaration This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text It does not exceed the prescribed word limit of 80,000 words for the Degree Committee of the Faculty of History. Yasuhiro Okazawa 13 November 2018 i Thesis Summary The Scientific Rationality of Early Statistics, 1833–1877 Yasuhiro Okazawa Summary This thesis examines the activities of the Statistical Society of London (SSL) and its contribution to early statistics—conceived as the science of humans in society—in Britain. The SSL as a collective entity played a crucial role in the formation of early statistics, as statisticians envisaged early statistics as a collaborative scientific project and prompted large-scale observation, which required cooperation among numerous statistical observers.
    [Show full text]