Beyond Rationalist Orthodoxy: Towards a Complex Concept of the Self in Ipe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beyond Rationalist Orthodoxy: Towards a Complex Concept of the Self in Ipe BEYOND RATIONALIST ORTHODOXY: TOWARDS A COMPLEX CONCEPT OF THE SELF IN IPE by SIMON GLAZE A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Political Science and International Studies The University of Birmingham May 2009 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract In this thesis I investigate the intellectual foundations of International Political Economy (IPE) in order to develop a more complex account of agency than that currently provided to the subject field by neoclassical economics. In particular, I focus on the thought of Adam Smith, whose ideas are gaining interest in IPE owing to an increasing recognition of his seminal contribution to the subject field. I investigate the secondary debate on Smith, his influences, his distance from his peers in the Scottish Enlightenment and his ongoing influence across the social sciences. I also analyse the thought of William James, and argue that his similarly influential concept of agency offers a complex view of the self that is complimentary to Smith’s account. I suggest that the framework of the self that these thinkers provide can present critical IPE theorists with an alternative concept of agency than the reductive account currently employed in the subject field. I argue that these theorists are unable to countenance such an alternative owing to their implicit acceptance of the analytical separation of economics and politics that became institutionalised after the Methodenstreit. I suggest that this is obscured by their commitment to normative interventionism, which I argue threatens to reiterate the universalist claims that they seek to challenge. For Dorota Acknowledgements I consider myself extremely fortunate to have had the opportunity to undertake this PhD at the Department of Political Science and International Studies (POLSIS) at the University of Birmingham during a particularly interesting period in its development. I would very much like to express my gratitude to Professor Dan Wincott and to Dr. Nicola Smith for their support, advice, and willingness to provide supervision to my project at limited notice. I would also like to thank Dr. Peter Kerr, Dr. Steve Buckler and Dr. Matt McDonald for their advice during this period, and Professors Colin Hay and Dave Marsh for supporting my initial application to the Economic and Social Research Council, without whose support I would not have been able to achieve this ambition. I would also have been unable to undertake my Institutional Visit to the Department of Political Science and International Studies at the University of Queensland. I would like to thank Dr. Richard Devetak for his supervision of my visit, and for the valuable advice that he gave on my thesis-in-progress while I was there. I would also like to thank my cohort at POLSIS with whom I have enjoyed numerous interesting discussions, including, in no particular order, Paul Lewis, Jane Colechin, Sebastian Barnutz, Urszula Bodzek, Ben Taylor, Caroline Kenney, Chris Holmes, Oscar Pardo Sierra, Jamie Reed, Holly Taylor, Lee Jarvis, Chloe Taylor, Parveen Akhtar and Judi Atkins. I owe an enormous debt of gratitude to Dr. Matthew Watson for his belief in my ability to write this PhD and for his unfailing support and advice during what has at times been an arduous process. I am confident that were it not for his consistently inspiring encouragement, advice, accessibility and interest in my ideas that this piece of work would have been considerably poorer. It may not have been written at all. I would also like to thank my family and closest friends for their ongoing support and understanding. Table of contents INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………1 1. SMITH AND THE SECONDARY DEBATE...…………………….…………………..18 1a) INTRODUCTION…….………………………………………………………...….. 19 PART ONE: SMITH’S BOOKS: AN OUTLINE…………………………………………………….21 1.1.1) THE WEALTH OF NATIONS.……………………………………………………….21 1.1.2) THE THEORY OF MORAL SENTIMENTS………………………………………….26 PART TWO: ORTHODOX INTERPRETATIONS…………………………………………..………31 1.2.1) SMITH, SCHUMPETER AND WALRAS………………………………………….31 1.2.2) SMITH, SAMUELSON AND NEWTON………………………………….………..37 1.2.3) THE INVISIBLE HAND, THE BUTCHER, THE BREWER AND THE BAKER………………………………………………………………………………43 1.2.4) THE ADAM SMITH PROBLEM……………………………………………………..52 PART THREE: HETERODOX INTERPRETATIONS………………………………………………59 1.3.1) STRATEGIST ACCOUNTS………………………………………………………...59 1.3.2) THEOLOGICAL ACCOUNTS……………………………………………………...68 1.3.3) THE CLARITY OF SMITH’S VIEWS…………………………………………...…77 1b) CHAPTER ONE CONCLUSION…………………………………………………...82 2. THE SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENMENT…………….……..…………………………....87 2a) INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………...88 PART ONE: SMITH’S INFLUENCES……………………………………………………………….93 2.1.1) HUTCHESON……………………………………………………………………….93 2.1.2) HUTCHESON AND HUME………………………………………………………...97 2.1.3) HUTCHESON, HUME AND SMITH……………………………………………..103 2.1.4) NATURAL JURISPRUDENTIAL AND CLASSICAL INFLUENCES…………..107 PART TWO: COMMON SENSE IN THE SCOTTISH ENLIGHTENMENT……………………..112 2.2.1) KAMES AND TURNBULL……………………………………………………….112 2.2.2) REID………………………………………………………………………………..119 2.2.3) FERGUSON………………………………………………………………………..126 2.2.4) MILLAR AND STEWART………………………………………………………...135 PART THREE: ‘OF THE INFLUENCE OF CUSTOM AND FASHION UPON MORAL SENTIMENTS’…………………………………………………………………….140 2.3.1) MORAL EDUCATION AND MEN OF SYSTEM………………………………..140 2.3.2) MULTIPLE IMPARTIAL SPECTATORS………………………………………...147 2.3.3) PRINCIPLES OF RIGHT AND WRONG…………………………………………153 2.3.4) ROMAN STOICISM……………………………………………………………….157 2b) CHAPTER TWO CONCLUSION…………………………………………………161 3. TOWARDS A SMITH-JAMES FRAMEWORK OF THE SELF…………………..168 3a) INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………….169 PART ONE: THE SELF AND IDENTITY………………………………………………………….177 3.1.1) THE MODERN SELF……………………………………………………………...177 3.1.2) SMITH, JAMES AND THE SELF…………………………………………………182 3.1.3) JAMES’S SELF…………………………………………………………………….188 3.1.4) THE PROBLEM OF IDENTITY…………………………………………………..200 PART TWO: THE SOCIAL SELF………………………………………………………………..…209 3.2.1) JAMES’S PRAGMATISM…………………………………………………………209 3.2.2) THE SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONIST SELF……………………………………..213 PART THREE: A PLURALISTIC UNIVERSE…………………………………………………….219 3.3.1) CONNECTING PRINCIPLES……………………………………………………..219 3.3.2) THE PRACTICAL IMAGINATION………………………………………………225 3.3.3) HABIT AND THE PRACTICAL IMAGINATION……………………………….234 3.3.4) PHILOSOPHY AND THE SELF…………………………………………………..239 3.3.5) PRAGMATISM AND COMMON SENSE………………………………………..244 3b) CHAPTER THREE CONCLUSION……………………………………………….252 4. POST-METHODENSTREIT APPROACHES TO THE SELF……………………...258 4a) INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………….259 PART ONE: RATIONALIST APPROACHES……………………………………………………...267 4.1.1) RATIONAL CHOICE AND THE TWO “IPES”…………………………………..267 4.1.2) RATIONALIST SEPARATIONS OF ECONOMICS AND PSYCHOLOGY…….272 4.1.3) RATIONALIST RECONNECTIONS OF ECONOMICS AND PSYCHOLOGY..277 PART TWO: INSTITUTIONALIST APPROACHES……………………………………………282 4.2.1) NEW INSTITUTIONALIST ECONOMICS………………………………………282 4.2.2) “OLD” INSTITUTIONALIST ECONOMICS……………………………………..288 PART THREE: CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACHES……………………………………………..293 4.3.1) CRITICAL REALISM……………………………………………………………..293 4.3.2) POSTSTRUCTURALIST AND SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST APPROACHES..302 4.3.3) RORTIAN NEOPRAGMATISM AND NEO-GRAMSCIANISM………………..307 4b) CHAPTER FOUR CONCLUSION………………………………………………...314 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………….320 LIST OF REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………332 INTRODUCTION 1 There is no way that contemporary international political economy can be understood without making some effort to dig back to its roots (Strange 1994: 18). An important criticism of international political economy (IPE) is that it employs a reductive account of agency in which individuals are assumed to act in a rationally self-interested, utility-maximising manner (e.g., Griffin 2007: 722; Murphy and Tooze 1991: 26; Watson 2005: 27). Despite the weakness of this account, derived from neoclassical economics, critical IPE theorists fail to replace it with a more convincing notion of the individual in society. Indeed, when attempts are made to introduce complex accounts of agency into IPE (e.g., Elms: 2008; Hobson and Seabrooke 2007a; Katzenstein, Keohane and Krasner 1998; McNamara 2009; O’Brien 2000; Odell: 2002), it is usually through a framework that implicitly replicates rationalist assumptions of the self. As such, agency remains poorly theorised in the subject field. In this thesis, I attempt to address this problem via a detailed analysis of the thought of Adam Smith and William James, which enables me to argue that their concepts of the self can provide IPE with a framework through which a more credible account of agency can be incorporated into the subject field. In doing so, I attempt to contribute to a burgeoning literature at the “cutting edge” of the discipline (Higgott and Watson 2008: 13) that suggests that such an objective can only be achieved via a critical understanding of IPE’s intellectual foundations. As such,
Recommended publications
  • “Bad” Greed from the Enlightenment to Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929)1 Erik S
    real-world economics review, issue no. 63 subscribe for free Civilizing capitalism: “good” and “bad” greed from the enlightenment to Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929)1 Erik S. Reinert [Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia and Norway] Copyright: Erik S. Reinert, 2013 You may post comments on this paper at http://rwer.wordpress.com/2013/03/25/rwer-issue-63/ As we look over the country today we see two classes of people. The excessively rich and the abject poor, and between them is a gulf ever deepening, ever widening, and the ranks of the poor are continually being recruited from a third class, the well-to-do, which class is rapidly disappearing and being absorbed by the very poor. Milford Wriarson Howard (1862-1937), in The American Plutocracy, 1895. This paper argues for important similarities between today’s economic situation and the picture painted above by Milford Howard, a member of the US Senate at the time he wrote The American Plutocracy. This was the time, the 1880s and 1890s, when a combination of Manchester Liberalism – a logical extension of Ricardian economics – and Social Darwinism – promoted by the exceedingly influential UK philosopher Herbert Spencer – threatened completely to take over economic thought and policy on both sides of the Atlantic. At the same time, the latter half of the 19th century was marred by financial crises and social unrest. The national cycles of boom and bust were not as globally synchronized as they later became, but they were frequent both in Europe and in the United States. Activist reformer Ida Tarbell probably exaggerated when she recalled that in the US “the eighties dripped with blood”, but a growing gulf between a small and opulent group of bankers and industrialists produced social unrest and bloody labour struggles.
    [Show full text]
  • New Working Papers Series, Entitled “Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics”
    Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics no. 74 the other canon foundation, Norway Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance CONTACT: Rainer Kattel, [email protected]; Wolfgang Drechsler, [email protected]; Erik S. Reinert, [email protected] 80 Economic Bestsellers before 1850: A Fresh Look at the History of Economic Thought Erik S. Reinert, Kenneth Carpenter, Fernanda A. Reinert, Sophus A. Reinert* MAY 2017 * E. Reinert, Tallinn University of Technology & The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; K. Car- penter, former librarian, Harvard University; F. Reinert, The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; S. Reinert, Harvard Business School. The authors are grateful to Dr. Debra Wallace, Managing Director, Baker Library Services and, Laura Linard, Director of Baker Library Special Collections, at Harvard Business School, where the Historical Collection now houses what was once the Kress Library, for their cooperation in this venture. Above all our thanks go to Olga Mikheeva at Tallinn University of Technology for her very efficient research assistance. Antiquarian book dealers often have more information on economics books than do academics, and our thanks go to Wilhelm Hohmann in Stuttgart, Robert H. Rubin in Brookline MA, Elvira Tasbach in Berlin, and, above all, to Ian Smith in London. We are also grateful for advice from Richard van den Berg, Francesco Boldizzoni, Patrick O’Brien, Alexandre Mendes Cunha, Bertram Schefold and Arild Sæther. Corresponding author [email protected] The core and backbone of this publication consists of the meticulous work of Kenneth Carpenter, librarian of the Kress Library at Harvard Busi- ness School starting in 1968 and later Assistant Director for Research Resources in the Harvard University Library and the Harvard College 1 Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis 2015 Version 97 Vale
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONOMICAS Y EMPRESARIALES Departamento de Historia e Instituciones Económicas I TESIS DOCTORAL Fundamentos teóricos de la controversia entre Hayek y Keynes. Dos visiones acerca del orden económico y la historia MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Pablo Losoviz Adaui Director Fernando Méndez Ibisate Madrid, 2017 © Pablo Losoviz Adaui, 2015 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS ECONÓMICAS Y EMPRESARIALES DEPARTAMENTO DE HISTORIA E INSTITUCIONES ECONÓMICAS I FUNDAMENTOS TEÓRICOS DE LA CONTROVERSIA ENTRE HAYEK Y KEYNES. DOS VISIONES ACERCA DEL ORDEN ECONÓMICO Y LA HISTORIA. TESIS DOCTORAL DE: PABLO LOSOVIZ ADAUI DIRIGIDA POR: FERNANDO MÉNDEZ IBISATE MADRID, 2015 © Pablo Losoviz Adaui, 2015. Agradecimientos y dedicatorias. En primer lugar deseo agradecer a mi tutor de Tesis, D. Fernando Méndez Ibisate, el cual al plantearle que deseaba realizar una investigación sobre el ciclo económico me sugirió que profundizara sobre el debate sostenido entre F. A. Hayek y J. M. Keynes. Sin duda que el provecho que he obtenido a lo largo de estos años de investigación abarca mucho más que simplemente el fenómeno del ciclo y solo espero que, aunque sea en cierta medida, en este trabajo de investigación haya quedado reflejado. En varios de los puntos de esta tesis sin mencionar explícitamente el problema de las crisis y fluctuaciones económicas el lector podrá observar sugerencias sobre el mismo de suma importancia. Realmente lo que se ha intentado es situar el debate entre Hayek y Keynes dentro de la órbita de la historia del pensamiento económico y en particular sobre la percepción filosófica y metodológica que juega la concepción de la Historia en ambos.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17533-4 — A Brief History of Economic Thought Alessandro Roncaglia Table of Contents More Information Contents Preface page ix 1 Introduction: The History of Economic Thought and Its Role 1 1.1 Why the History of Economic Thought Is Considered Useless: The Cumulative View 1 1.2 The Competitive View 3 1.3 The Stages of Economic Theorising: Conceptualisation and Model-building 7 1.4 Economics and the History of Economic Thought 8 2 The Prehistory of Political Economy 10 2.1 Why We Call It Prehistory 10 2.2 Classical Antiquity 14 2.3 Patristic Thought 16 2.4 The Scholastics 17 2.5 Usury and Just Price 19 2.6 Bullionists and Mercantilists 22 2.7 The Naissance of Economic Thought in Italy: Antonio Serra 23 3 William Petty and the Origins of Political Economy 27 3.1 Life and Writings 27 3.2 Political Arithmetic and the Method of Economic Science 28 3.3 National State and the Economic System 31 3.4 Commodity and Market 33 3.5 Surplus, Distribution, Prices 35 4 From Body Politic to Economic Tables 39 4.1 The Debates of the Time 39 4.2 John Locke 40 4.3 The Motivations and Consequences of Human Actions 42 4.4 Bernard de Mandeville 43 4.5 Richard Cantillon 45 4.6 François Quesnay and the Physiocrats 48 4.7 The Political Economy of the Enlightenment; Turgot 51 4.8 The Italian Enlightenment: the Abbé Galiani 53 4.9 The Scottish Enlightenment: Francis Hutcheson and David Hume 55 v © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-17533-4 — A Brief History of
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Classical Economics from Smith to Malthus Robert L
    Section XIV: The ndusI trial Revolution, Classical Contemporary Civilization (Ideas and Institutions Economics, and Economic Liberalism of Western Man) 1958 6. Classical Economics from Smith to Malthus Robert L. Bloom Gettysburg College Basil L. Crapster Gettysburg College Harold L. Dunkelberger Gettysburg College See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/contemporary_sec14 Part of the Economic History Commons, and the Economic Theory Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Bloom, Robert L. et al. "6. Classical Economics from Smith to Malthus. Pt XIV: The ndusI trial Revolution, Classical Economics, and Economic Liberalism." Ideas and Institutions of Western Man (Gettysburg College, 1958), 16-20. This is the publisher's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ contemporary_sec14/6 This open access book chapter is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 6. Classical Economics from Smith to Malthus Abstract In 1776, several years after his good friend James Watt ah d obtained the first patent covering the steam engine and several years before the process for making wrought iron was devised, Adam Smith (1723-1790), a retired professor of moral philosophy at the University of Glasgow, published An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. This book was immediately popular.
    [Show full text]
  • Uadphilecon National & Kapodistrian University of Athens Department of Economics Nicholas J
    UADPhilEcon National & Kapodistrian University of Athens Department of Economics Nicholas J. Theocarakis 2014 History of Economic Thought Web Links on Mercantilism1 Bullionists “W.S.” (John Hales d.1571, Sir Thomas Smith ) A Discourse of the Common Weal of this Realm of England, 1581 or A Compendious; Or Briefe Examination of Certayne Ordinary Complaints of Diuers of Our Countrymen in These Our Dayes (Written 1541, not by William Shakespeare despite the 1751 edition) Thomas Milles, c.1550-1627. The Customers Replie, or Second Apologie :…, An Aunswer to a confused Treatise of Publicke Commerce . in favour of the . Merchants Adventurers,' &c., 1604 Gerard de Malynes, c.1586-1641 Saint George for England Allegorically Described, 1601. A Treatise on the Canker of England's Commonwealth, 1601. Consuetudo vel Lex Mercatoria or the Ancient Law- Merchant, 1622. The Maintenance of Free Trade, 1622. The Centre of the Circle of Commerce, 1623. 1 Based on the History of Economic Thought Website [now a dead link] UADPhilEcon, HET, Mercantilists 1/7 Traditional Mercantilists John Wheeler, c.1553-1611. Treatise on Commerce, 1601 Edward Misselden, 1608-1654. Free Trade and the Means to Make Trade Flourish, 1622 Circle of Commerce 1623. Thomas Mun, 1571-1641. A Discourse of Trade from England unto the East- Indies, 1621. in England's Treasure by Forraign Trade, 1664. (Written 1628) facsimile Lewis Roberts, 1596 – 1640 The Merchantes Mappe of Commerce , 1638 The Treasure of Traffike, 1640 John Locke, 1632-1704. A Letter Concerning Toleration, 1689. Two Treatises on Government, 1690. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, 1690. pt 2 Some Considerations of the Consequences of the Lowering of Interest and Raising the Value of Money, 1692 Further Considerations Concerning Raising the Value of Money, 1695.
    [Show full text]
  • Kuhn Versus Lakatos, Or Paradigms Ver Su S Research Programmes in the History of Economics
    [HOPE Vol. 7 (1975) No. 41 Kuhn versus Lakatos, or paradigms ver su s research programmes in the history of economics Mark Blaug In the 1950’s and 1960’s economists learned their methodology from Popper. Not that many of them read Popper. Instead, they read Friedman, and perhaps few of them realized that Friedman is simply Popper-with-a-twist applied to economics. To be sure, Friedman was criticized, but the “Essay on the Methodology of Positive Economics” nevertheless survived to become the one arti- cle on methodology that virtually every economist has read at some stage in his career. The idea that unrealistic “assumptions” are nothing to worry about, provided that the theory deduced from them culminates in falsifiable predictions, carried conviction to economists long inclined by habit and tradition to take a purely instrumentalist view of their subject. All that is almost ancient history, however. The new wave is not Popper’s “falsifiability” but Kuhn’s “paradigms.” Again, it is un- likely that many economists read The Structure oj Scientific Revolu- tions (1962). Nevertheless, appeal to paradigmatic reasoning quickly became a regular feature of controversies in economics and “paradigm” is now the byword of every historian of economic thought.’ Recently, however, some commentators have expressed misgivings about Kuhnian methodology applied to economics, throw- ing doubt in particular on the view that “scientific revolutions” characterize the history of economic thought.* With these doubts I heartily concur. I will argue that the term “paradigm” ought to be banished from economic literature, unless surrounded by inverted commas. Suitably qualified, however, the term retains a function in the historical exposition of economic doctrines as a reminder of the Copyright 1976 by Mark Blaug MARKBLAUG is Head of the Research Unit in the Economics of Education at the University of London.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Fiscal Policy Affect the American Worker?
    HOW DOES FISCAL POLICY AFFECT THE AMERICAN WORKER? JOHN D. MUELLER* OVERVIEW American policymakers have begun to prepare the public for fiscal policy changes, such as comprehensive reforms of the Federal income tax and Social Security retirement systems, which would profoundly alter the lives of American workers and their families. Projected fiscal imbalances are clearly unsustainable, and Europe’s economic and demographic crisis, characterized by high unemployment and falling fertility rates, illustrates the grave dangers of policy mistakes. But no American consensus has emerged, partly because there is no generally accepted and empirically grounded theory explaining how fiscal policy affects employment and fertility. This paper lays out a simple but com- prehensive framework for analyzing such questions, by proceed- ing from the homey example of a children’s lemonade stand to describe how Augustine’s theory of personal love and Aristotle’s theory of distributive justice were originally integrated within economic analysis. The second section applies the analysis to describe and update “Rueff’s Law,” which explains how employ- ment and unemployment are determined by the cost of labor (measured as workers’ share of total labor and property income after government taxes and benefits). The analysis shows that funding social benefits either by borrowing or with income taxes raises the cost of labor and unemployment, while funding such benefits with payroll taxes does not increase unemployment but may lower labor market participation. The third section extends the analysis to fill a crucial gap in the economic theory of fertility and shows that most variation in the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) among the fifty countries for which data are available (compris- * John D.
    [Show full text]
  • Despite Christine Margerum Harlen's Warning in ISQ in the Early Years Of
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our policy information available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this paper please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published version may require a subscription. Author(s): Matthew Watson Article Title: Friedrich List’s Adam Smith Historiography and the Contested Origins of Development Theory Year of publication: 2012 Link to published article: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/CTWQ Publisher statement: This is an electronic version of an article published in Watson, M. (2012). Friedrich List’s Adam Smith Historiography and the Contested Origins of Development Theory. Third World Quarterly. Third World Quarterly is available online at: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/CTWQ Friedrich List’s Adam Smith Historiography and the Contested Origins of Development Theory Matthew Watson University of Warwick Accepted for publication and forthcoming, April 2012, Third World Quarterly. Contact Details: Professor Matthew Watson Department of Politics and International Studies University of Warwick Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK [email protected] 0247-652-8465 Notes on Contributor: Matthew Watson is Professor of Political Economy in the Department of Politics and International Studies at the University of Warwick. He has research interests in the historiography of economics, especially in relation to the classical political economy tradition. He has published widely on this topic and, in particular, on the relationship between contemporary International Political Economy theory and the history of economic ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • A.C. Pigou and the 'Marshallian' Thought Style
    A.C. PIGOU AND THE ‘MARSHALLIAN’ THOUGHT STYLE A STUDY IN THE PHILOSOPHY AND MATHEMATICS UNDERLYING CAMBRIDGE ECONOMICS Karen Lovejoy Knight PALGRAVE STUDIES IN THE HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought Series Editors Avi J. Cohen Department of Economics York University and University of Toronto Toronto, ON, Canada G.C. Harcourt School of Economics University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia Peter Kriesler School of Economics University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW, Australia Jan Toporowski Economics Department SOAS, University of London London, UK Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought publishes contri- butions by leading scholars, illuminating key events, theories and indi- viduals that have had a lasting impact on the development of modern-day economics. The topics covered include the development of economies, institutions and theories. More information about this series at http://www.palgrave.com/gp/series/14585 Karen Lovejoy Knight A.C. Pigou and the ‘Marshallian’ Thought Style A Study in the Philosophy and Mathematics Underlying Cambridge Economics Karen Lovejoy Knight Independent Scholar Duncraig, WA, Australia Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought ISBN 978-3-030-01017-1 ISBN 978-3-030-01018-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01018-8 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018959362 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and trans- mission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloth for Wine? Strong Justification for Freer Trade
    November 2017 Two hundred years ago, with a simple yet profound example about England trading cloth for Portuguese wine, David Ricardo introduced the Principle of Comparative Advantage. This seemingly counter- intuitive logic not only explained why nations trade, it also provided a Cloth for Wine? strong justification for freer trade. But what is the relevance today of this parable of cloth-for-wine? In this eBook, leading trade policy analysts examine whether Ricardo’s The Relevance of Ricardo’s insights remain valid in a world where services as well as good cross borders as does data and technology, where there is a rising China whose growth is heavily dependent on exports, and in the face of a Comparative Advantage in backlash against globalisation. The contributions to this eBook are non-technical and have implications the 21st Century for policymaking, and can inform debates about how open economies should be to the rest of the world and shape decisions by businesses, civil society, and trade unions. Edited by Simon J. Evenett ISBN 978-1-912179-07-7 Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street London EC1V 0DX Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801 Email: [email protected] www.cepr.org 9 781912 179077 CEPR Press CEPR Press Cloth for Wine? The Relevance of Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage in the 21st Century CEPR Press Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street London, EC1V 0DX UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cepr.org ISBN: 978-1-912179-07-7 Copyright © CEPR Press, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • An Outline of Economics and Demographics in the Top 5 Commerce Cities by GDP
    International Journal of Economics MANAGEMENT and JOURNALS Management Sciences managementjournals.org Vol. 1, No. 12, 2012, pp. 78-89 INDIA BUSINESS PRIMER – An Outline of Economics and Demographics in the Top 5 Commerce Cities by GDP Amandip Singh Sidhu 3237 King George Hwy, South Surrey, BC. V4B 1P7 E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article provides a brief business primer to those interested in India from an investment or entrepreneurship perspective. The top 5 cities for commerce are presented, based upon their Purchasing Power Parity Gross Domestic Product (PPP GDP). Key statistics including, demographics, literacy rates and religious breakdowns are presented, as well as economic drivers for each of the top 5 commerce cities. 1. INTRODUCTION “The Indus Valley civilization, one of the world's oldest, flourished during the 3rd and 2nd millennia B.C. and extended into northwestern India. Aryan tribes from the northwest infiltrated onto the Indian subcontinent about 1500 B.C.; their merger with the earlier Dravidian inhabitants created the classical Indian culture. The Maurya Empire of the 4th and 3rd centuries B.C. - which reached its zenith under Ashoka - united much of South Asia. The Golden Age ushered in by the Gupta dynasty (4th to 6th centuries A.D.) saw a flowering of Indian science, art, and culture. Islam spread across the subcontinent over a period of 700 years. In the 10th and 11th centuries, Turks and Afghans invaded India and established the Delhi Sultanate. In the early 16th century, the Emperor Babur established the Mughal Dynasty which ruled India for more than three centuries.
    [Show full text]