DOCSLIB.ORG

Hampton Roads, VA Camps E U.S.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hampton Roads, VA Camps E U.S.S HAMPTON 9 (Burned by Gen. Magruder 64 14 August, 1861) 7 Chesapeake 14 13 10 HAMPTON Hospitals 13 Battle of Hospitals 11 Bay 13 Federal 17 CAMP K 17 U.S.S. Amanda (bark) E 16 18 Hampton Roads, VA camps E U.S.S. Thomas Freeborn 22 U.S.S. St. Lawrence HAMILTON R C 24 8 Fort 18 (stood 5 miles out) 23 5 L 14 28 IL Monroe 27 8 2 M 1 3 White Squall March 8, 1862 10,000 men 18 24 27 9 7 36 64 7 25 85 7 8 7 180 guns U.S.S. Monitor 4 80 (Enters 50 89 29 18 1 9 3 9 105 63 42Hampton Roads 8 10 9 U.S.S. Minnesota 10 10 22 22 17 72 about 9:00 p.m.) James River Fleet 22 18 22 7 27 72 91 3 2 17 light U.S.S. Mystic 36 12 7 U.S.S. joins the Virginia 7 75 Light ship 13 r Mt. Vernon 38 80 4 60 60 U.S.S. Roanoke CSS Teaser a 54 3 B 66 10 9 9 25 33 37 76 U.S.S. Cambridge18 13 n 6 66 15 28 60 11 o 38 60 7b y ' s B a CSS Patrick Henry 3 t l o u g h n k 52 L.B. Myers i l 10 7 p Catinat 66 55 W 21 35 U.S.S. Sewannee 13 m 17 66 U.S.S. Kingston 6 11 a (French (all non-military12 (assisted Minnesota) CSS Jamestown 3 H 9 27 observing)72 18 68 46 11 5 America 24 (Thomas Jefferson3 ) ships leave area 16 12 11 57 68 by midnight)12 3 9 6 11 Area of new land 11 8 46 10 80 45 10 25 28 40 7 9 7 17 54 57 14 11 10 11 21 Reindeer 7 6 Fort Wool Virginia 9 16 75 (captured) NEWPORT Gassendi 21 3 57 10 guns 27 (turning) Area of MARCH 9th Battle11 of the Ironclads 44 (French 22 60 29 25 NEWS/ 10 12 12 220 men 21 18 23 45 U.S.S. Mystic 5observing) 60 schooner 9 r 12 48 69 Salter's a 59 24 (burned) Point B 12 42 9 22 Creek s 8 20 16 11 18 33 13 10 13 10 21 CAMP w 57 32 10 Whilden 3 e 18 66 13 10 53 5 2 27 43 24 22 18 (sunk) BUTLER N 66 9 10 11 11 18' 11 t 15Young 8,000 troops r 9 14 22 39 12 5 o 17 St. Lawrence America 27 10 2 U.S.S. 8 guns p 7 43 61 19 (grounded 5:45 pm)16 8 12 w 3 12 31 Cumberland28 e 11 10 a y 50 19 29 15 B 21 (swings around) N 21 16 South Channel s Whitehall 16Cambridge North Channel 32 ' s ) 9 25 36 69 9 y a t 45 b F l 9 9 22 34 10 7 h 36 g y 21 28 a 7 4 20 64 57 22 21 30 u B Congress 24 l o s 18 39 l d 12 (grounded 4 pm) Minnesota 43 14 9 i n 12 28 32 a James River 12 S P.H. 27 22 22 (grounded 3 pm) 28 W ( U.S.S. 24 28 24 27 Ocean 22 (Tugboat24 27 11 23 29 22 32 25 View Congress 57 Roanoke 10 21 assisting) 37 1 60 7 21 (by 5 pm) Area of new land 4 37 22 26 26 23 22 Virginia 23 33 16 11 21 41 37 Patrick18 Henry Virginia 21 19 (1:00pm) 8 15 12 24 27 21 (by 5:30 pm) 25 45 20 33 27 18 7 14 (2:15 pm) 20 22 17 Teaser 4 28 19 8 18 25 23 18 23 24 18 Jamestown 16 (4:30 pm) Sewell's Pt. 8 41 (5:30 pm) 15 64 17 28 10 Patrick 23 n d Batteries 25 17 o u 25 14 20 23 M G r 23 16 i d d15 l e Raleigh 23 Henry 17 10 16 25 25 Raleigh 31 guns 24 23 14 7 21 16 10 (damaged) 26 24 28 pier 7 2 24 13 26 15 22 (1:30 pm) Jamestown 26 17 22 (7:30 pm) 16 18 25 22 18 (towing) 28 18 15 9 Beaufort 12 25 12 Zouave 28 16 22 4 (fires on 26 13 27 19 26 14 approaching 21 10 Confederate 28 Beaufort Virginia) 23 12 10 camps 12 20 no.8 13 13 26 564 20 22 17 16 1 7 Harmony 15 21 E 10 13 16 19 15 10 10 12 21l no.10 11 19 10 26 i 2 Hampton 18 22 z 11 11 11 11 1 26 a 11 15 11 no.12 11 12 15 23 10 10 b 13 15 16 10 23 15 22 e 13 10 2 12 10 Roads10 10 t 26 24 15 8 9 buoy 14 no.14 h 10 10 0 13 1 mile 9 10 no.5 32 11 11 12 11 10 R 14 2 9 11 24 Area of new land 1 11 no.16 10 10 6 26 i 16 30 10 v 2 11 10 14 2 10 11 10 7 5 3 er's C Pig 10 26 e n r 9 n e 64 Pt. 2 11 a Quarantine ek 10 42 r T 9 9 12 Pt. 1 2 6 10 9 16 10 Tanner's Pig Pt. 11 10 22 r. 41 14 Pt. C no.18 33 6 guns River Batteries 5 's 1 10 11 664 r 11 Battery Nansemond le 9 36 13 ff 2 o 5 10 H 1 5 14 37 16 10 1 24 C.S.S. Germantown 1 no.20 52 floating battery sunken obstructions CRANEY I. LIGHT 1 17 337 51 9 3 Confederate 9 21 C.S.S. Beaufort 17 9 460 camps 1 Craney Island 21 Batteries 9 C.S.S.12 9 Virginia 16 20 1 33 (11:30no.7 8 a.m.) no.22 36 12 168 Legend 33 3 7 25 C.S.S. Raleigh Lambert's Confederate Union 3 no.9 8 34 Point 8 29 30 Batteries 36 Main Ships 13 C.S.S. Virginia C.S.S. Harmony 40 Union blockade ship 8 positions before battle 8 40 25 25 18 6 8 no.24 Supporting Ships 8 no.26 no.13 8 17 2 9 25 19 Ships & forts under attack 12 11 24 168 18 3 or damaged during battle 28 18 7 22 no.15 10 23 no.28 24 10 28 29 20 19 3 16 Route of ships no.30 Battery Fort Modern roads r Pinner's Pt. Norfolk 17 e 664 v 1862 Town limits i R th e NORFOLK b Naval 17 a z Hospital li 264 Prepared for the Civil War Trust by E & Battery f Robert E. Pratt - [email protected] o ch an E r aster Weste B n Branc r n h of Elizabeth River PORTSMOUTH 30 guns Gosport 464 264 Gosport Navy Yard.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Battle of the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia Battle of Antietam Creek
    CK_5_TH_HG_P231_324.QXD 2/13/06 1:56 PM Page 282 II. The Civil War: Causes, Conflicts, Consequences had a highly successful military career. He served with distinction in the Mexican- American War, was superintendent of West Point for a period in the 1850s, and was in command of the troops at Harpers Ferry that captured John Brown. At the beginning of the war, Lincoln asked Lee to assume command of the Union forces, but Lee refused out of loyalty to his home state, Virginia. He instead accepted a command in the Confederate army. Lee scored a number of important victories, but faced with dwindling resources, his army was unable to withstand the larger, better-equipped Union army. General Stonewall Jackson Cross-curricular General Thomas Jackson was given the nickname “Stonewall” because of his Teaching Idea actions in the First Battle of Bull Run. During the battle, a Confederate soldier “Stonewall” Jackson is described in noted that Jackson and his men were “standing like a stone wall.” The nickname “Barbara Freitchie,” listed in the poetry stuck: for the rest of the war Jackson was known as “Stonewall Jackson.” selections for this grade. You may wish Considered by many to be General Lee’s most able general, Jackson orches- to teach this poem in conjunction with trated Confederate victories in the Shenandoah Valley campaign. He led his forces your discussion of Jackson and the bat- brilliantly at the Second Battle of Bull Run, and at the battles at Antietam and tles in the east. Fredericksburg. He was wounded in 1863 during the battle of Chancellorsville and died eight days later.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company “Virginia in Dry
    Guide to the Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company “Virginia in Dry Dock” Postcard, 1906 MS0429 The Mariners' Museum Library at Christopher Newport University Contact Information: The Mariners' Museum Library 100 Museum Drive Newport News, VA 23606 Phone: (757) 591-7782 Fax: (757) 591-7310 Email: [email protected] URL: www.MarinersMuseum.org/library Processed by Jay E. Moore, 2012 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Repository: The Mariners' Museum Library Title: Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company “Virginia in Dry Dock” Postcard Inclusive Dates: 1906 Catalog number: MS0429 Physical Characteristics: 1 picture postcard Language: English Creator: Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company (Firm); Richardson, Benjamin A. (Benjamin Adworth) HISTORICAL SKETCH The Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company was formed in 1906 with the immediate purpose of issuing commemorative postcards to be sold during the Jamestown Tercentenary celebration in 1907. The company produced postcards commemorating the events of Mar.8 and 9, 1862 during the Battle of Hampton Roads. It also created postcards pertaining to the life of CSS Virginia. They range from the April 19, 1861 destruction at the Gosport Navy Yard of the US steam frigate Merrimack, from whose hulk Virginia was built, to the destruction of the ironclad on the shores of Craney Island, Virginia, on May 10-11, 1862 at the hands of its own crew. The paintings on the postcards were taken from a series of original works by Benjamin A. Richardson (1833-1909). Richardson, born in Portsmouth, was a self-taught, amateur artist. Early in life, he earned a living as a house and sign painter. During the Civil War, Richardson enlisted in Norfolk as a private in the Confederate States Army in the United Artillery under Captain Thomas Kevill.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navy in the Civil
    The Navies of the Civil War Overview Anderson, Bern. By Sea and by River: the Naval History of the Civil War. New York: Knopf, 1962. F834 A545b Hearn, Chester G. Naval battles of the Civil War. San Diego: Thunder Bay Press, 2000. UN834 H436n 2000 Oversized Material Porter, David D. The Naval History of the Civil War. New York: Sherman Publishing Co., 1886. F834 P84n Union Joiner, Gary D. Mr. Lincoln’s Brown Water Navy: the Mississippi Squadron. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007. UN834 J74m Merrill, James M. The Rebel Shore: the Story of Union Sea Power in the Civil War. Boston: Little, Brown, 1957. F834 M571r Taaffe, Stephen R. Commanding Lincoln's Navy: Union Naval Leadership During the Civil War. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2009. UN834 T111c Confederacy Campbell, R. Thomas, editor. Voices of the Confederate Navy: Articles, Letters, Reports, and Reminiscences. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, 2008. UN861 V889 Hearn, Chester G. Gray Raiders of the Sea: How Eight Confederate Warships Destroyed the Union's High Seas Commerce. Camden, Maine: International Marine Publishing, 1992. F834z H436g Scharf, J. Thomas. History of Confederate States Navy from Its Organization to the Surrender of Its Last Vessel. Albany, New York: Joseph McDonough, 1894. F834z S31h 1894 Gunboats Walke, Henry. Naval Scenes on the Western Waters. The gunboats Taylor, Carondelet and Lafayette. [S.l., 187-?] F8347 N318 Gosnell, Harpur Allen. Guns on the Western Waters: the Story of River Gunboats in the Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, [1949]. F834 G677g Joyner, Elizabeth Hoxie. The USS Cairo: History and Artifacts of a Civil War Gunboat.
    [Show full text]
  • Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog Number MS164
    Guide to the Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog Number MS164 The Library at The Mariners' Museum Contact Information: The Library at The Mariners' Museum 100 Museum Drive Newport News, VA 23606 Phone: (757) 591­7782 Fax: (757) 591­7310 Email: [email protected] URL: www.mariner.org/library Processed by: Gregg Cina, 2005 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Repository: The Library at The Mariners' Museum Title: Irwin M. Berent Collection, 1862­1988 Catalog number: MS164 Accession number: None Physical Characteristics: 8 document cases Language(s): English Creator(s): Irwin M. Berent SCOPE AND CONTENT This collection is composed of materials pertaining to the crew and officers who served aboard USS Monitor and CSS Virginia as well as their descendents. Irwin Berent compiled and generated these materials between 1978 and 1988. This collection is the result of his work on two different, but overlapping groups of projects: the first centers on the crew and officers of said vessels; the second concentrates on their descendents. The first group of projects concerns Berent’s research for biographical works he published on the crew and officers of Monitor and Virginia. Perhaps the most notable among these is Crewmen of the USS Monitor: A Biographical Directory published in 1982. Materials include photocopies of affidavits, clippings, congressional reports, correspondence, death certificates, depositions, marriage certificates, medical records, military records, notes, and pension records from the 1860s through the 1920s that Berent obtained from the United States National Archives and Records Administration. Related notes and correspondence as well as edited and unedited copies of manuscripts are also included. The second group of projects concerns Berent’s work locating descendents of the crew and officers of Monitor and Virginia, his communication with them, and subsequent meetings and events.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Wooden Gunboat Construction
    Confederate Wooden Gunboat Construction: Logistical Nightmare By Adam C. Edmonds May, 2011 Director of Thesis: Lawrence E. Babits, Ph.D. History Department The Confederate States Navy built wooden gunboats throughout the American Civil War. Within Civil War literature, more research and detailed analysis of Confederate States Navy construction focuses on building of ironclad vessels. Wooden gunboat construction is largely ignored. This thesis examines wooden gunboat construction in two different areas of the Confederacy: northeastern North Carolina in Washington and Elizabeth City, and the Mars Bluff Navy Yard in South Carolina. Before presenting two Confederate wooden gunboat construction case studies, a look at Confederate industrial, manufacturing, and transportation infrastructure, from the national perspective, brings into focus the logistical limitations station commanders faced in northeastern North Carolina and at Mars Bluff more clearly. Scattered, yet interdependent, marine manufacturing and ordnance facilities, connected by a suspect transportation network, created a logistical nightmare. Historical investigation into wooden gunboat construction in Washington, Elizabeth City, and Mars Bluff, examines an overlooked Confederate States Navy building program. CONFEDERATE WOODEN GUNBOAT CONSTRUCTION: LOGISTICAL NIGHTMARE A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts in History By Adam C. Edmonds May 2011 © Adam Edmonds,
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Hampton Roads March 8-9, 1862 Before, During, After
    Welcome: To The Battle of Hampton Roads Be sure you are on Zoom Audio Mute and Stop Video Questions: please utilize the chat box to type in your questions during the presentation—I will try to answer them at the Break/End of Class At the bottom (or top) of your Zoom screen is a Menu Bar Click on the Chat icon to bring up the chat box Hit “Enter” on your keyboard to send your Chat message Recommend click on “show small active speaker video” Michael W. Collier, Ph.D. Docent, Mariners’ Museum Newport News, Virginia Source: Mariners’ Museum Meet the Instructor Education High School: Lafayette County C-1, Higginsville, Missouri BS, U.S. Coast Guard Academy MS, U.S. Defense Intelligence College (now National Intelligence University) Ph.D., International Relations, Florida International University Professional Career U.S. Coast Guard Officer (cutter operations/training & intelligence) Professor at FIU and Eastern Kentucky University In Retirement Osher Institute Instructor, College of William & Mary Docent, Mariners’ Museum, Newport News, Virginia Start of the U.S. Civil War Late-1700s & early-1800s’ politics surrounding slavery led to the war Abraham Lincoln (R) elected President on November 6, 1860 South Carolina seceded from the United States December 20, 1860 Seven total States in deep-south seceded by Lincoln’s inauguration March 4, 1961 Fort Sumter attacked April 12-13, 1861 Virginia seceded April 17, 1861, Source: Britannica followed by Tennessee, North Carolina, & Arkansas Anaconda Plan Union Early War Strategy: Blockade Confederate ports from Virginia to Florida, around Gulf of Mexico, and in Mississippi River System Seize Confederate capital in Richmond, Virginia—first attempt was Union Peninsula Campaign March-July 1862, commanded by MGen George McClellan Source: Library of Congress Building the Confederate Navy Confederate Secretary of the Navy Mallory faced building a Confederate Former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue Cutter & Lighthouse Service Civil War Chronology
    U.S. Revenue Cutters and Lighthouse Service in the Civil War 6 November 1860 Election of 1860- Republican Abraham Lincoln is elected President of the United States 20 December 1860 South Carolina passes an Ordinance of Secession. 27 December 1860 William Aiken seized by the state of South Carolina. Deemed not sufficiently seaworthy to serve in the Confederate Navy, she was transferred to a group of Charleston business men as a privateer. 1861 Frying Pan Shoals (NC) Lightship seized/sunk by the state of North Carolina. 1861 USLHT Jasper (or Firefly) seized on the ways during repairs by the state of North Carolina at Wilmington, NC. 1861 Bowler's Rock (VA) Lightship removed, sunk, or destroyed by Confederate forces. 1861 Roanoke River (NC) Lightship removed, sunk, or destroyed by Confederate forces. 1861 Rattlesnake Shoal (SC) Lightship removed, sunk or destroyed by Confederate forces. 1861 Harbor Island (NC) Lightship removed, sunk, or destroyed by Confederate forces. January 1861 USLHT Helen seized by the state of South Carolina. As CSS Helen the tender served as a supply ship on the coast of Florida January 1861 USLHT Howell Cobb seized by the state of South Carolina at Charleston, SC. 5 January 1861 US steamer Star of the West, under Captain John McGowan, former Revenue Marine officer, departed New York with an Army detachment for the relief of Fort Sumter, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. 9 January 1861 Mississippi passes an Ordinance of Secession. 10 January 1861 Florida passes an Ordinance of Secession. 11 January 1861 Alabama passes an Ordinance of Secession. 18 January 1861 USLHT Alert seized by the state of Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form See Instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type All Entries-Complete Applicable Sections 1
    Jt,(2.. ,,, ID/,4/[;~ 2 ,JM- .-- l?D~ /vt!f~:;;, DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBIUlY NOTIFICATION National Register of Historic Places National Park Service Name of property: V. S .S. Cumberland Location: State: VA Request submitted by: DOD/COE/Michael M. Jenks Dote received: 1-11- 83 Additional information received: Op inion of the State Historic Preservation Officer: D Eligible 0Not El igible 0 No Response Comm ents: The Secretary of the Interior has determined that th is property is: (]} Eligible A ppliccb le criteria: D 0 Not Eligible Comments: The info.rmation supplied indicates that positive iden:tificatior:. af these roemains as the V.S. S. Cwnberland is not cur:i•entZy possible. The infor­ ma~ion does indicate, however, that there is a resonable p~oba.bility th.a.t they are. The info:rmation also indicates t-hat this is a Civil Wat> era war ship that may provide impo't'ta:nt information rega:Pdless of i t s identifieation. If fu.rither information substantiates that this is t he 0. S.S. Cumhe't'land it may acquipe added sig-r1.ij'icance. It is important fo11 the data it may provide about the v.s.s. Cumbe:t'lcmd and a.bout Civi-Z Wcai e't'a navei activi­ i;ies in the James R{'Je 't'. D Documentation insufficift nt (Please see accompanying sheet ex plo ining additional materials reqJJ ired) of the N'ational Register WAS0- 28 Dote:---'--¥~f!A-'63_ NPS Form 10.900 ' - "- .;;.. ·, __) (7-81) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places-· Inventory-Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries-complete applicable sections 1.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Duel of the Ironclads” the CSS Virginia
    “The Duel of the Ironclads” Hampton Roads, Virginia 9 March 1862 The US Navy Historical Center Compiled and Edited by Major Paul L. Stokes USMC 20 February 2004 “The Duel of the Ironclads” Table of Contents Map of Hampton Roads Area and Lower James River, Virginia, 1861 3 The CSS Virginia 4 CSS Virginia destroys USS Cumberland and USS Congress, 8 March 1862 5 The USS Monitor 7 "The Duel of the Ironclads": Action between USS Monitor and CSS Virginia, 9 March 1862 8 The Aftermath 12 Battle Reports and Letters 13 - Battle Report of Captain Marston, U.S. Navy, senior officer present, aboard the screw frigate USS Roanoke (Pg 13) - Battle Report of Lieutenant George Morris, executive officer of the frigate USS Cumberland (Pg 15) - Battle Report of Lieutenant Pendergrast, U.S. Navy, executive officer of the frigate USS Congress (Pg 16) - Battle Report of Captain Van Brunt, U.S. Navy, commanding the steam frigate USS Minnesota (Pg 18) - Battle Report of Lieutenant Greene, U.S. Navy, executive officer of the [ironclad] USS Monitor (Pg 21) - Letter from Chief Engineer Stimers, USS Monitor, to Captain John Ericsson, giving an account of the engagement (Pg 22) - Battle Report of Flag-Officer Buchanan, Commander of CSS Virginia and the James River Squadron, C.S. Navy (Pg 23) - Battle Report of Lieutenant Jones, executive officer of the ironclad ram CSS Virginia, in command during the battle with USS Monitor (Pg 29) - Battle Report of Major-General Huger, C.S. Army, commanding Department of Norfolk, on the impact of ironclad warships in warfare (Pg 30) Sources & Notes 31 2 “The Duel of the Ironclads” 3 “The Duel of the Ironclads” The CSS Virginia (Formerly USS Merrimack) On 20 April 1861, when Virginia authorities took over the Norfolk Navy Yard after its evacuation by Federal forces, they found, among other valuable items, the hulk of the steam frigate USS Merrimack.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Architecture Analysis of the Civil War Ironclad CSS Virginia
    Naval Architecture Analysis of the Civil War Ironclad CSS Virginia Nicholas Edward Marickovich Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Ocean Engineering Alan J. Brown, Chair Stefano Brizzolara Sean M. Keary 5 December 2016 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Ironclad, Naval Architecture, Civil War Naval Architecture Analysis of the Civil War Ironclad CSS Virginia Nicholas Marickovich ABSTRACT This thesis presents the results of a naval architecture analysis of the Civil War Ironclad CSS Virginia, built by the Confederate States Navy to break the Union Blockade of Hampton Roads, and which engaged the USS Monitor on the second day of the Battle of Hampton Roads, March 9th, 1862. The purpose of the analysis was to examine the ship from a naval architectural standpoint pertaining to hydrostatics, stability, weight and CG, sea keeping, and basic resistance/powering requirements. The goal was to see if the story of the CSS Virginia, destroyed on May 11th, 1862 by its own crew to keep it from falling into Union hands, could have ended differently with an attack on Washington, a Northern city, or a run to a friendly Southern port, such as Savannah or Charleston. Paramarine software was used to build a geometry model based on lines included in a book by Sumner B. Besse for ship modelers. The geometry model provided the basic measures of displacement for the hull form at a draft of 21 ft forward and 22 ft aft which in turn allowed for a weight estimate to be undertaken.
    [Show full text]
  • The Construction of USS Monitor and Its Impact on the Upper-Hudson Valley by Marcus R
    The Construction of USS Monitor and its impact on the Upper-Hudson Valley By Marcus R. Cimino The Hudson Valley region of New York State played a major role in the Union’s struggle, and later success during the American Civil War (1861-1865). The creation of the famous ironclad vessel, the USS Monitor is a clear example of this effort, and was completed from start to finish, within the region. Although the infamous battles at Hampton Roads between the Monitor and her nemesis CSS Virginia did not physically take place in the Hudson Valley, the building of the monitor deeply impacted the Hudson Valley by creating economic stimulation at home. While the war waged on in the border states of the Union and the Confederacy, the backbone of the northern war effort: labor, entrepreneurship, and military innovation-all were being exercised in the Hudson Valley by the Monitor’s contractors. No one task during the war stands out as more monumental amongst the Upper-Hudson Valley’s accomplishments than the building of the USS Monitor. This new era of naval warfare could not have been brought about without the Hudson Valley’s manufacturing capacity and the men who made it happen. Swedish inventor, and designer John Ericsson crafted the USS Monitor in a crucial time for the Union Navy. Ericsson had undertaken designs of Ironclad ships previously for European nations including France under Napoleon III however these were always rejected. What was most impressive about the Monitor was its rotating turret, which unlike CSS Virginia, could turn 360 degrees, and possessed two 12-inch cannons.
    [Show full text]
  • The History, Discovery and Recovery of the USS Monitor
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2012 Ironclad Revolution: The History, Discovery and Recovery of the USS Monitor Anna Gibson Holloway College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Holloway, Anna Gibson, "Ironclad Revolution: The History, Discovery and Recovery of the USS Monitor" (2012). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623591. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-6ta9-r518 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ironclad Revolution: The History, Discovery and Recovery of the USS Monitor Anna Gibson Holloway Hayes, Virginia Master of Arts, The College of William and Mary, 1997 Bachelor of Arts, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1990 Bachelor of Arts, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1986 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History The College of William and Mary January 2012 Copyright 2012 Anna Gibson Holloway APPROVAL PAGE This Dissertation is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Approved by the Committee, De~ember 2011 ~of &.A Committee Chair Professor Carol Sheriff, History The College of William and Mary Professor Scott Nelson The C of William and Dr.
    [Show full text]