DOCSLIB.ORG

The Battle of Hampton Roads, Or How to Change Everything in Two Days

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Battle of Hampton Roads, Or How to Change Everything in Two Days The Battle of Hampton Roads, or how to change everything in two days. Alejandro Vidal Crespo Service Director, Investment Strategy MONTHLY STRATEGY REPORT March 2015 Monthly Strategy Report. March 2015 The Battle of Hampton Roads, or how to change everything in two days. Innovation is crucial in all fields. We cannot fall victim to complacency; we must react to the innovations of others, though they may be our rivals. As an illustration, we offer a graphic historic event in which “you innovate or sink”. On the morning of 8 March 1862, the USS Cumberland, an elegant, wooden sailing frigate, was anchored off the land batteries of Newport News, in the Chesapeake Bay, United States. The USS Cumberland formed part of a flotilla of five ships loyal to the Union that, together with the land batteries at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay, maintained the naval blockade of two of the Confederacy’s main cities, Richmond and Norfolk, across the bay. Shortly after midday, a Confederate flotilla was spotted heading up the James River sailing directly toward the Union squadron, led by a steam-powered, ironclad warship. Deviating from the usual pattern of naval engagement, the infiltrator headed straight for Cumberland; the frigate opened fire but the munitions bounced off the iron plates without penetrating. The strange ship only opened fire from short distances while ramming her opponent with a metal bow ram beneath the waterline. The USS Cumberland sank rapidly, with her colours flying in the wind and her guns firing until the last minute when, at 3:35 p.m., she went under, dragging 121 seamen down with her. The CSS Virginia, formerly the USS Merrimack, had claimed her first victim. After Cumberland, her counterpart in the blockade, the USS Congress (with 100 crewmen aboard) also succumbed, and another three Union vessels, witnessing the fate of the two frigates, ordered their ships grounded in shallow waters under the protection of the land batteries, which did not prevent another of them, the USS Minnesota, from suffering serious damage. War at sea would never be the same, not even the next day. Though steam power had already been integrated in the fleets of the time (without venturing further, the USS Minnesota, present at the battle beside Cumberland, and to which we will return later, was a steam-powered frigate), and the first ironclad ships had already been built (French and British fleets had been experimenting with these vessels), they had never before seen combat and their performance in actual operations remained questionable. Until that day. But let us take a step back to put the battle in context. On 19 April 1861, the Civil War broke out when the Confederate army attacked Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina. President Lincoln immediately ordered a naval blockade of the Confederacy. On 27 April that same year, the states of North Carolina and Virginia joined the Confederacy, and with them, one of the navy’s key facilities: the Gosport Navy Yard in Portsmouth. Though the commanding officers were loyal to the Union, the same could not be said of the infantrymen or the local population, so loyalists were ordered to destroy the base and set fire to the ships, lest it fall into Confederate hands. One of the best vessels in the yard, the steam-powered USS Merrimack only sustained damage to the superstructure, leaving the hull and engines intact. The leaders of the Confederate South knew they could never equal the North in terms of industrial capacity (meaning, the number of ships), but if they wanted to break the naval blockade that isolated them from the world of trade, they needed a ground-breaking idea that would level the battlefield. Accordingly, the Confederate Secretary of the Navy, Stephen Mallory, commissioned a group of engineers to develop –in record time– a modern vessel that was so superior to the existing ships, it would single-handedly tip the war at sea in their favour. The engineers salvaged the hull and the Monthly Strategy Report. March 2015 engines of the steamship Merrimack, covered it with armoured iron cladding, reduced the number of guns in exchange for larger calibre weapons (only 10 versus 50 on the USS Cumberland) and installed a ram under the waterline: the first ironclad warship, the CSS Virginia, was born in February of 1862. These efforts did not go unnoticed by the North, who had learned of the Merrimack’s development through spies, and although the odds were against them, they initiated their own project to build a steam-powered, armoured warship just in case. After studying a number of projects, they chose to build the most innovative of all, based on the design of Swedish engineer, John Ericsson. The ship’s armaments would be reduced to just two large calibre guns mounted on a steam-powered rotating turret that could be operated by just one man. Only days before the Battle of Hampton Roads, the USS Monitor was launched in Brooklyn, New York. Now, let us return to the battle where we left off. After scuttling Congress and Cumberland, Virginia turned her attention toward the next Union frigate, the USS Minnesota. Having witnessed the fate of his comrades and noticing the deep draft of Virginia, the Captain wisely decided to avoid confrontation in deep waters and headed for the shallows, where he would not only be able to maintain a safe distance from Virginia, he would have backing from the coastal artillery. He purposefully ran the ship aground, where Minnesota continued to suffer shelling from the ironclad, but before nightfall, with damage to her smokestack (reducing her speed), and as the tide receded, the CSS Virginia retreated to base for repairs with the intention of returning the next day and completing the task. She had left three Union vessels aground, one badly damaged, and two at the bottom of the bay: an unmitigated victory. The next day, after some minor repairs, Virginia once again sailed from her base to the battlefield. She headed directly toward the USS Minnesota, and what appeared to be a small steam-powered tugboat trying to buoy the ship. It was the USS Monitor, the Union’s own ironclad warship that had arrived at dawn to try to level the odds. Upon learning about events in the Chesapeake, and fearing that Virginia would sail for its cities, even up the Potomac River to the White House, the North’s generals sent the warship to Hampton Roads and positioned her defensively to protect the crippled USS Minnesota. Virginia fired the first round in the initial showdown between the ironclads, but the shot flew past Monitor and struck Minnesota. This began an engagement that lasted more than three hours, mostly at close range. Though the artillery of both ships had the potential to pierce through armour, neither succeeded in doing so. In the case of Virginia, because she lacked adequate munitions; deployed initially to fight wooden ships, her guns were supplied only with shell rather than armour-piercing shot. In the case of Monitor, because her guns had not been properly tested to carry a charge of 30kg of gunpowder per shot, they operated at half charge, which did not give the projectile sufficient momentum to penetrate Virginia’s armour. After the confrontation, which ended in stalemate, both ships returned to their bases. They spent the remainder of the conflict trying to goad other vessels to attack, without engaging in combat. The CSS Virginia was ultimately destroyed by her crew: with the blockade unbroken, Norfolk was of little strategic use to the Confederacy, and the draft of the ship was too great to permit her to pass up the river toward Richmond, so, rather than allow her to fall into enemy hands, she was destroyed in May of 1862. The USS Monitor sunk off the coast of Cape Hatteras on the last day of the year 1862. Her low freeboard made her highly unseaworthy in rough waters, and she felt prey to the waves. Despite the unfortunate outcome of both ships, their short lives completely changed the rules of naval engagement. Impressed by the ease with which one ship overpowered an entire flotilla, the major navies of the world declared an end to the era of wooden hulls. In terms of design, the Monitor prevailed, and her rotating turrets and concentrated firepower still appear on warships today. The US Navy improved the design to make it operational in high seas, and Russia, France and Great Britain ordered their navies to quickly replace their fleets with armoured ships. Virginia’s bow ram also became the standard, prevailing almost until the First World War, when improvements in ballistics made such Monthly Strategy Report. March 2015 an approach between ships unthinkable. A revolution in the shipbuilding industry was to follow, and just two decades later, when war broke out in Cuba, the contending vessels would have been seen as nothing short of spaceships to observers of the Battle of Hampton Roads. The USS New York (1895) moved at speeds of 20 knots, unimaginable in the mid-nineteenth century, with a displacement of 8,000 tonnes, compared to the 6 knots and 1,000 tonne displacement of the USS Monitor, a small colossus, like her rival and companion in history, the CSS Virginia in the South, USS Merrimack in the North. Both fought bravely and earned their place in the history of the Chesapeake Bay, which is, incidentally, an enormous crater (85 km in diameter and 1.3 km deep) caused by the impact of a meteor 4 km in diameter 35 million years ago.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922
    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Ships and Submarines of the United States Navy
    AIRCRAFT CARRIER DDG 1000 AMPHIBIOUS Multi-Purpose Aircraft Carrier (Nuclear-Propulsion) THE U.S. NAvy’s next-GENERATION MULTI-MISSION DESTROYER Amphibious Assault Ship Gerald R. Ford Class CVN Tarawa Class LHA Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 USS Peleliu LHA-5 John F. Kennedy CVN-79 Enterprise CVN-80 Nimitz Class CVN Wasp Class LHD USS Wasp LHD-1 USS Bataan LHD-5 USS Nimitz CVN-68 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72 USS Harry S. Truman CVN-75 USS Essex LHD-2 USS Bonhomme Richard LHD-6 USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN-69 USS George Washington CVN-73 USS Ronald Reagan CVN-76 USS Kearsarge LHD-3 USS Iwo Jima LHD-7 USS Carl Vinson CVN-70 USS John C. Stennis CVN-74 USS George H.W. Bush CVN-77 USS Boxer LHD-4 USS Makin Island LHD-8 USS Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 SUBMARINE Submarine (Nuclear-Powered) America Class LHA America LHA-6 SURFACE COMBATANT Los Angeles Class SSN Tripoli LHA-7 USS Bremerton SSN-698 USS Pittsburgh SSN-720 USS Albany SSN-753 USS Santa Fe SSN-763 Guided Missile Cruiser USS Jacksonville SSN-699 USS Chicago SSN-721 USS Topeka SSN-754 USS Boise SSN-764 USS Dallas SSN-700 USS Key West SSN-722 USS Scranton SSN-756 USS Montpelier SSN-765 USS La Jolla SSN-701 USS Oklahoma City SSN-723 USS Alexandria SSN-757 USS Charlotte SSN-766 Ticonderoga Class CG USS City of Corpus Christi SSN-705 USS Louisville SSN-724 USS Asheville SSN-758 USS Hampton SSN-767 USS Albuquerque SSN-706 USS Helena SSN-725 USS Jefferson City SSN-759 USS Hartford SSN-768 USS Bunker Hill CG-52 USS Princeton CG-59 USS Gettysburg CG-64 USS Lake Erie CG-70 USS San Francisco SSN-711 USS Newport News SSN-750 USS Annapolis SSN-760 USS Toledo SSN-769 USS Mobile Bay CG-53 USS Normandy CG-60 USS Chosin CG-65 USS Cape St.
    [Show full text]
  • “What Are Marines For?” the United States Marine Corps
    “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2011 Major Subject: History “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era Copyright 2011 Michael Edward Krivdo “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, R. J. Q. Adams James C. Bradford Peter J. Hugill David Vaught Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2011 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. (May 2011) Michael E. Krivdo, B.A., Texas A&M University; M.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Joseph G. Dawson, III This dissertation provides analysis on several areas of study related to the history of the United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. One element scrutinizes the efforts of Commandant Archibald Henderson to transform the Corps into a more nimble and professional organization. Henderson's initiatives are placed within the framework of the several fundamental changes that the U.S. Navy was undergoing as it worked to experiment with, acquire, and incorporate new naval technologies into its own operational concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia Battle of Antietam Creek
    CK_5_TH_HG_P231_324.QXD 2/13/06 1:56 PM Page 282 II. The Civil War: Causes, Conflicts, Consequences had a highly successful military career. He served with distinction in the Mexican- American War, was superintendent of West Point for a period in the 1850s, and was in command of the troops at Harpers Ferry that captured John Brown. At the beginning of the war, Lincoln asked Lee to assume command of the Union forces, but Lee refused out of loyalty to his home state, Virginia. He instead accepted a command in the Confederate army. Lee scored a number of important victories, but faced with dwindling resources, his army was unable to withstand the larger, better-equipped Union army. General Stonewall Jackson Cross-curricular General Thomas Jackson was given the nickname “Stonewall” because of his Teaching Idea actions in the First Battle of Bull Run. During the battle, a Confederate soldier “Stonewall” Jackson is described in noted that Jackson and his men were “standing like a stone wall.” The nickname “Barbara Freitchie,” listed in the poetry stuck: for the rest of the war Jackson was known as “Stonewall Jackson.” selections for this grade. You may wish Considered by many to be General Lee’s most able general, Jackson orches- to teach this poem in conjunction with trated Confederate victories in the Shenandoah Valley campaign. He led his forces your discussion of Jackson and the bat- brilliantly at the Second Battle of Bull Run, and at the battles at Antietam and tles in the east. Fredericksburg. He was wounded in 1863 during the battle of Chancellorsville and died eight days later.
    [Show full text]
  • Ex HMAS Adelaide Scuttling
    Project Profile Ex HMAS Adelaide Scuttling Client NSW Land & Property Management Authority Location Glebe Island Wharf No. 2, Sydney Harbour, New South Wales Duration 18 months, 2011 Contract Scuttling of Ex HMAS Adelaide Vessel for use as an Artificial Reef Cost $6.5 Million Project Overview Stripping and preparation of former war ship to a virtual skeleton and scuttling off the NSW mid coast. This ship participated in the 1990/91 Gulf War, peacekeeping operations in East Timor in 1999 and deployed to the Arabian Gulf as part of the International Coalition against Terrorism in 2001 and 2004. She was Australia’s first guided-missile frigate and was home-ported in Western Australia. McMahon Services were contracted by NSW Land & Property Management Authority to prepare the vessel for scuttling off the NSW mid coast. This was an enormous task – stripping a fully operational war ship to make it a virtual skeleton. All environmental hazards required total removal. We had to develop methods to make the vessel do what it was never design to do…sink. The vessel was littered with specially cut holes to let water in and air out when it was scuttled. The main task was to penetrate bulkheads and clearing pathways through the vessel so that divers had enough room to manoeuvre through safe thoroughfares. Ex HMAS Adelaide Scuttling | Page 1 Key Milestones: Milestone 1: Establishment and Vessel Delivery Milestone 2: Initial Preparation and Towage Milestone 3: Design and Ship Preparation Milestone 4: Scuttling Milestone 5: Post Scuttling Activities
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company “Virginia in Dry
    Guide to the Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company “Virginia in Dry Dock” Postcard, 1906 MS0429 The Mariners' Museum Library at Christopher Newport University Contact Information: The Mariners' Museum Library 100 Museum Drive Newport News, VA 23606 Phone: (757) 591-7782 Fax: (757) 591-7310 Email: [email protected] URL: www.MarinersMuseum.org/library Processed by Jay E. Moore, 2012 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Repository: The Mariners' Museum Library Title: Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company “Virginia in Dry Dock” Postcard Inclusive Dates: 1906 Catalog number: MS0429 Physical Characteristics: 1 picture postcard Language: English Creator: Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company (Firm); Richardson, Benjamin A. (Benjamin Adworth) HISTORICAL SKETCH The Merrimac & Monitor Post Card Company was formed in 1906 with the immediate purpose of issuing commemorative postcards to be sold during the Jamestown Tercentenary celebration in 1907. The company produced postcards commemorating the events of Mar.8 and 9, 1862 during the Battle of Hampton Roads. It also created postcards pertaining to the life of CSS Virginia. They range from the April 19, 1861 destruction at the Gosport Navy Yard of the US steam frigate Merrimack, from whose hulk Virginia was built, to the destruction of the ironclad on the shores of Craney Island, Virginia, on May 10-11, 1862 at the hands of its own crew. The paintings on the postcards were taken from a series of original works by Benjamin A. Richardson (1833-1909). Richardson, born in Portsmouth, was a self-taught, amateur artist. Early in life, he earned a living as a house and sign painter. During the Civil War, Richardson enlisted in Norfolk as a private in the Confederate States Army in the United Artillery under Captain Thomas Kevill.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina Naval Wreck Survey Christopher F
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Presentations Maritime Research Division 2012 South Carolina Naval Wreck Survey Christopher F. Amer University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/mrd_prsn Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info 2012. http://www.cas.sc.edu/sciaa/ © 2012 by The outhS Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology This Presentation is brought to you by the Maritime Research Division at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CUA LECTURE: SOUTH CAROLINA NAVAL WRECK SURVEY Slide 1 COVER PAGE Slide 2 SC coast 200 miles from NC to Georgia, twice that counting inlets and bays. Only 30 feet deep out to 5 miles, many treacherous and shifting sandbars. Slide3 Since 16th C thousands of ships visit the coast for exploration, colonization, war and commerce. Many went ashore on the treacherous shoals, and sank for various reasons in the more than 3000 square miles of waterways and rivers, eventually becoming state-owned resources. Slide 4 Among the countless wrecked watercraft in State waters lies a body of naval vessels spanning the years from the American Revolution to modern times. These wrecks are still owned by the Department of the Navy, which maintains custody of all US Navy vessels not specifically relinquished by an act of Congress no matter where they are located in the world. Navy has turned to the states as co-stewards to help in developing management plans for these national treasures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Navy in the Civil
    The Navies of the Civil War Overview Anderson, Bern. By Sea and by River: the Naval History of the Civil War. New York: Knopf, 1962. F834 A545b Hearn, Chester G. Naval battles of the Civil War. San Diego: Thunder Bay Press, 2000. UN834 H436n 2000 Oversized Material Porter, David D. The Naval History of the Civil War. New York: Sherman Publishing Co., 1886. F834 P84n Union Joiner, Gary D. Mr. Lincoln’s Brown Water Navy: the Mississippi Squadron. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007. UN834 J74m Merrill, James M. The Rebel Shore: the Story of Union Sea Power in the Civil War. Boston: Little, Brown, 1957. F834 M571r Taaffe, Stephen R. Commanding Lincoln's Navy: Union Naval Leadership During the Civil War. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2009. UN834 T111c Confederacy Campbell, R. Thomas, editor. Voices of the Confederate Navy: Articles, Letters, Reports, and Reminiscences. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, 2008. UN861 V889 Hearn, Chester G. Gray Raiders of the Sea: How Eight Confederate Warships Destroyed the Union's High Seas Commerce. Camden, Maine: International Marine Publishing, 1992. F834z H436g Scharf, J. Thomas. History of Confederate States Navy from Its Organization to the Surrender of Its Last Vessel. Albany, New York: Joseph McDonough, 1894. F834z S31h 1894 Gunboats Walke, Henry. Naval Scenes on the Western Waters. The gunboats Taylor, Carondelet and Lafayette. [S.l., 187-?] F8347 N318 Gosnell, Harpur Allen. Guns on the Western Waters: the Story of River Gunboats in the Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, [1949]. F834 G677g Joyner, Elizabeth Hoxie. The USS Cairo: History and Artifacts of a Civil War Gunboat.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Army Air Forces in WWII
    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Air Force Historical Studies Office 28 June 2011 Errata Sheet for the Air Force History and Museum Program publication: With Courage: the United States Army Air Forces in WWII, 1994, by Bernard C. Nalty, John F. Shiner, and George M. Watson. Page 215 Correct: Second Lieutenant Lloyd D. Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 218 Correct Lieutenant Hughes To: Second Lieutenant Lloyd H. Hughes Page 357 Correct Hughes, Lloyd D., 215, 218 To: Hughes, Lloyd H., 215, 218 Foreword In the last decade of the twentieth century, the United States Air Force commemorates two significant benchmarks in its heritage. The first is the occasion for the publication of this book, a tribute to the men and women who served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War 11. The four years between 1991 and 1995 mark the fiftieth anniversary cycle of events in which the nation raised and trained an air armada and com- mitted it to operations on a scale unknown to that time. With Courage: U.S.Army Air Forces in World War ZZ retells the story of sacrifice, valor, and achievements in air campaigns against tough, determined adversaries. It describes the development of a uniquely American doctrine for the application of air power against an opponent's key industries and centers of national life, a doctrine whose legacy today is the Global Reach - Global Power strategic planning framework of the modern U.S. Air Force. The narrative integrates aspects of strategic intelligence, logistics, technology, and leadership to offer a full yet concise account of the contributions of American air power to victory in that war.
    [Show full text]
  • Warships of the Ancient World 3000–500 Bc
    WARSHIPS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 3000–500 BC ADRIAN K. WOOD ILLUSTRATED BY GIUSEPPE RAVA © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com NEW VANGUARD 196 WARSHIPS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 3000–500 BC ADRIAN K. WOOD ILLUSTRATED BY GIUSEPPE RAVA © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 t Chronology BCE EGYPT 5 t Egyptian ships and seafaring t Warships of Rameses III t Tactics, organization and the battle of the Delta t Ships of the Sea Peoples MINOAN CRETE 15 t The Minoan Thalassocracy t Minoan ships t Minoan tactics BRONZE AGE SYRIA 20 t Ugarit and the Hittites t Syrian ships t Tactics and the battle of Alasiya PHOENICIA: THE LEGACY OF UGARIT 24 t Phoenician sea power t Phoenician warships t Phoenician naval practices and tactics GREECE 30 t Homeric warlords, warriors and ships t Early pentekonters t Hekatonters t Eikosoroi t Homeric tactics t Colonial wars (c. 700–500 BCE) t Late pentekonters t Triakonters t Archaic tactics and the battle of Alalia t Tyrants and sea power t Polycrates and the Samaina t The end of an era BIBLIOGRAPHY 47 t Primary Sources t Select Secondary Sources Index INDEX 48 © Osprey Publishing • www.ospreypublishing.com WARSHIPS OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 3000–500 BC INTRODUCTION The warships which fought for mastery of the Mediterranean during the Classical period were the culmination of centuries of development. This book traces the naval innovations that culminated in the standardized warships of Greek, Carthaginian and Roman fleets. The size and general configuration of pre-Classical warships remained comparable throughout the two millennia culminating around 500 BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Submarine Warfare Today
    Jacobson 205 Chapter VIII The Law of Submarine Warfare Today by Jon L. Jacobson* Introduction he roles of military submarines have evolved throughout the twentieth T century. In wartime, these roles have included coastal defense, harassment of enemy fleets, and, especially in World War II, hunting and destroying the seaborne commerce that supported the enemy's war efforts. Today, two principal roles for u.s. submarines, at least in any future war with the Soviet Union, are probably as anti-submarine weapons (attack submarines) and as strategic weapons platforms (ballistic missile submarines). Other missions, however, could include coastal defense, attacks on the enemy's surface fleet, projection of force ashore, and commerce warfare.1 The laws of war have never been comfortable with the submarine's unique combination of stealth and vulnerability. As will be explained below, it is this peculiar mix of strength and weakness that can be blamed as the root cause of the legal dilemma, particularly as it relates to the submarine's role as a commerce raider. The legal responses to this twentieth-century weapons platform have ranged from early proposals for its abolition to justification of its use under the rules of reprisal to tolerance of it as an effective war machine with characteristics that regrettably require some adjustments in the traditional laws of war. The U.s. Navy's new Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (NWP 9) includes references to the laws of naval warfare that specifically address the submarine weapons system and also rules that apply, or can apply, to submarines and their roles in wartime.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Parker, William Harwar. Recollections of a Naval Officer
    Parker, William Harwar. Recollections of a Naval Officer, 1841-1865. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1985. CHAPTER I. Entrance into the Navy. Join the North Carolina, 74, at New York. First Impressions. Hammocks versus Cotton Bales. Midshipmen s Pranks. The U. S. brig Somers. The brig Boxer. Melancholy Suicide. The " By-No-Meal " Theorem. Am Ordered to the line-of-battle ship Columbus. A poetical Sailmaker , 3 CHAPTER II. My First Cruise. The Columbus, 74. Ghosts. Cross the Atlantic. Gibraltar. Guarda Costa and Smugglers. Port Mahon. Assassination of Mr. Patterson. Lieutenant Charles G. Hun ter. Squadron Winters in Genoa. Passed Midshipmen Beale and Murray. The brig Somers. A Duel. Return to Mahon. The Delaware, 74. Toulon. Cape de Gata. Gibraltar Again. Madeira. Sail for the Coast of Brazil. Saturday Night Yarns. Target Practice. Improvement in Gunnery. Captain Marryatt and American Thunder 12 CHAPTER III. Arrival at Rio de Janeiro. The East India Squadron. Anecdotes of the War of 1812. The Brazil Station. Slavers. The Harbor of Rio de Janeiro. Marriage of the Emperor Dom Pedro. Salutes. Promotions in the Squadron. Monte Video. The Bishop of Honolulu. Visit to Buenos Ayres. Rosas, the Dictator. La Senorita Manuelita. A Day at Rosas Quinta. Return to Rio. Arrival of the frigate Raritan. Sandy Thompson’s Will Return to the United States . 25 CHAPTER IV. The frigate Potomac. The Millerite Excitement. Sail for Norfolk. Leave Norfolk for the West Indies. The Landfall of Columbus. Gonaives. Port-au-Prince. A San Domingo Game-Cock. The Yellow Fever. Port Royal. Havana. Tomb of Columbus. Pensacola. Vera Cruz.
    [Show full text]