The Alternative Vote in British Columbia: Values Debates and Party Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Alternative Vote in British Columbia: Values Debates and Party Politics The Alternative Vote in British Columbia: Values Debates and Party Politics by Stephen Harrison B.A., University of Victoria, 2008 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of History © Stephen Harrison, 2010 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-73724-8 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-73724-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis. cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. 1+1 Canada Supervisory Committee The Alternative Vote in British Columbia: Values Debates and Party Politics by Stephen Harrison B.A., University of Victoria, 2008 Supervisory Committee Dr. P. E. Bryden, (Department of History) Supervisor Dr. Richard Rajala, (Department of History) Departmental Member Ill Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. P. E. Bryden, (Department of History) Supervisor Dr. Richard Rajala, (Department of History) Departmental Member This thesis provides a detailed account of the introduction, use, and repeal of the alternative vote (AV) in British Columbia in the 1950s. It argues that British Columbians, familiar with polarized, two-party politics, were dismissive of majority representation. Conversely, the public expressed a strong preference for local representation during discussions of redistribution. While the Liberal and Conservative Coalition parties introduced AV to keep the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation from forming a government, party members were often stronger proponents of electoral reform than their leaders. Nevertheless, the system was debated in terms of democratic values. This was true of electoral reform debates across Canada, including federal debates on proportional representation. Contrary to histories that focus solely on the 1952 and 1953 AV elections and W.A.C. Bennett and Social Credit, this project traces the origins of the alternative vote in BC from the 1940s forward, including ongoing discussions of the single transferable vote (STV) and a points system. The history of BC's provincial party system in the twentieth century is included in order to establish how polarized politics affected British Columbians' attachment to the idea of local representation. This thesis contends that the public's preference for plurality voting contributed to its dismissal of AV: even those who ranked multiple candidates did not necessarily endorse the system. This project also looks at the alternative vote debates in the 1970s and redistribution commissions in BC, particularly the 1978 Eckardt Commission, in order to better understand British Columbians' attachment to local representation and first-past-the-post, and their dismissal of a preferential system that encouraged them to rank candidates. Social Credit favoured regional representation over representation by population during the redistribution process, and the theme of local representation has consistently framed discussions of electoral reform in British Columbia, including the 2004 BC Citizens' Assembly's STV proposal. iv Table of Contents Supervisory Committee ii Abstract iii Table of Contents iv Acknowledgments v Introduction — Electoral Reform in Historical Context: The Importance of Democratic Values 1 Chapter 1 — Proportional Representation and the Alternative Vote in Canada 14 Chapter 2 — Reconsidering the Voting System: Two-Party Politics in British Columbia 39 Chapter 3 - The Alternative Vote in the 1952 and 1953 Elections: The Persistence of Plurality 87 Chapter 4 — Electoral Redistribution and Local Representation in British Columbia 128 Conclusion — British Columbia and the Alternative Vote in Context 163 Bibliography 190 V Acknowledgments I was first drawn to British Columbia's history with electoral reform when I read a 2005 Times Colonist article on the use of the alternative vote in the 1950s. The article did not equate the system with the single transferable vote, which was put to a referendum in the 2005 election, but it nevertheless noted that electoral reform in BC was actually old news. This information was new to me, however, and in 2007 I wrote a short paper on the subject for an undergraduate course with Dr. Richard Rajala. For his enthusiastic response to my work, and his insistence that our class make a trek down to the BC Archives, I am forever grateful. I am also appreciative of his more recent comments on my thesis, as well as those of Dr. Dennis Pilon, whose own research helped bring this work to life. This project was just getting underway in early 2009, which coincided with BC's second referendum on the single transferable vote. I must therefore thank my colleagues, friends, and family for tolerating untold acronym-heavy discussions of voting systems with good humour and minimal yelling. I would also like to thank Lisa Pasolli, Lee Blanding, and Amber Ayers for their comments on an early version of my first chapter. I subjected Ryan Tervo to multiple inane complaints over the past two years, and I thank him for his alleged moral support and his assistance with a problem sentence. Finally, I am most indebted to my supervisor, Dr. Penny Bryden, for providing encouragement and insightful feedback throughout the research and writing process. I cannot imagine having written this thesis with anyone else. Introduction - Electoral Reform in Historical Context: The Importance of Democratic Values The voting system in Canada is often taken for granted. Under plurality voting, or the first-past-the-post (FPTP) system, voters cast a single vote for a candidate, and the candidate with the most votes in a district represents that constituency. FPTP and constituency representation are both well-established practices. The voting system does not have to remain constant, however, and indeed in Canadian history it has not. Electoral reform was a frequent subject of discussion in Canada during the first half of the twentieth century. Governments, opposition parties, politicians, independent reformers, and voters all debated the prospect of changing the voting system. Voting systems determine how votes are translated into seats, and the distribution of seats determines who governs. Changing how ballots are marked and candidates are elected will invariably affect the composition of government. In 1952, the Liberal and Conservative parties in British Columbia abandoned FPTP in favour of the alternative vote (AV), which allowed voters to rank candidates on their ballots. The Liberals and Conservatives had governed as a coalition from 1941 to 1952, and the adoption of AV was driven by their desire to stay in power. They needed the public to engage with the system for it to have its desired effect, however. Faced with the public's familiarity with FPTP and two-party politics, which encouraged a single vote for a single candidate, the old-line parties launched a campaign focused on the democratic fairness of the new voting system. Only AV could ensure candidates were elected by a majority, they said, and it would keep the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), which was supported by a minority of voters, out of office. Many British Columbians used AV to vote the way they always had, ranking a single 2 candidate; others ranked only ideologically similar candidates. Both of these mindsets perpetuated the divided political system and encouraged the abolition of AV and a return to FPTP in 1953. Examining the ingrained traditions of plurality voting can go some way to explaining the function of the party system in BC, the necessity of the alternative vote, and the ultimate rejection and abolition of the system. The 1952 election marked the emergence of the Social Credit party as a
Recommended publications
  • Paying for the Party
    PX_PARTY_HDS:PX_PARTY_HDS 16/4/08 11:48 Page 1 Paying for the Party Myths and realities in British political finance Michael Pinto-Duschinsky edited by Roger Gough Policy Exchange is an independent think tank whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas which will foster a free society based on strong communities, personal freedom, limited government, national self-confidence and an enterprise culture. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with aca- demics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy out- comes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Tru, stees Charles Moore (Chairman of the Board), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Camilla Cavendish, Robin Edwards, Richard Ehrman, Virginia Fraser, Lizzie Noel, George Robinson, Andrew Sells, Tim Steel, Alice Thomson, Rachel Whetstone PX_PARTY_HDS:PX_PARTY_HDS 16/4/08 11:48 Page 2 About the author Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky is senior Nations, the European Union, Council of research fellow at Brunel University and a Europe, Commonwealth Secretariat, the recognised worldwide authority on politi- British Foreign and Commonwealth cal finance. A former fellow of Merton Office and the Home Office. He was a College, Oxford, and Pembroke College, founder governor of the Westminster Oxford, he is president of the International Foundation for Democracy. In 2006-07 he Political Science Association’s research was the lead witness before the Committee committee on political finance and politi- on Standards in Public Life in its review of cal corruption and a board member of the the Electoral Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Reformers and Liberals: The
    liBERAL paRTY ColoURS the early 1950s when the party Lady Megan no confidence brought following 32 Michael Meadowcroft, b. 1942: Executive was discussing the the decisive British defeat of the Liberal MP for Leeds West 1983–87. matter. The rivalry and antipathy thundered Revolutionary War at the battle of 33 http://www.bramley.demon.co.uk/ between the left-wing Lady Megan Yorktown. liberal.html Lloyd George46 and the more that she 17 Leslie Mitchell, The Whig World: 34 Information to the author from traditional Lady Violet Bonham 1760–1837 (Hambledon Continuum, Michael Meadowcroft, 23 Mar. 2012. Carter was well known. After didn’t care 2005), p. 4. 35 The Times, 13 Oct. 1964, p. 17. going through a number of options 18 Ibid., p. 13. 36 Information to the author from Lady Megan thundered that she what colour 19 Mark Raymond Bonham Carter Michael Meadowcroft, 6 Mar. 2012. didn’t care what colour the party the party (Baron Bonham-Carter), 1922–1994, 37 Information to the author from fought in – as long as it wasn’t grandson of Liberal prime minister Michael Steed, 6 Mar. 2012. violet. fought in – H. H. Asquith. 38 Block, Source Book, p. 78. 20 Mark Pottle (ed.), Daring to Hope: The 39 Lady Violet Bonham Carter, Graham Lippiatt is a Contributing as long as it Diaries and Letters of Violet Bonham Baroness Asquith of Yarnbury Editor to the Journal of Liberal Carter, 1946–69 (Weidenfield and DBE, 1887–1969: daughter of prime History. wasn’t violet. Nicolson, 2000), pp. 199–200. minister H. H.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Historic Section 0 What the General Election Numbers Mean - Michael Steed 0 Runners and Riders for Next Leader
    0 Liberator at 50 - special historic section 0 What the general election numbers mean - Michael Steed 0 Runners and Riders for next leader Issue 400 - April 2020 £ 4 Issue 400 April 2020 SUBSCRIBE! CONTENTS Liberator magazine is published six/seven times per year. Commentary.............................................................................................3 Subscribe for only £25 (£30 overseas) per year. Radical Bulletin .........................................................................................4..5 You can subscribe or renew online using PayPal at ALL GOOD THINGS COME TO AN END ............................................5 You’ll soon by seeing Liberator only as a free PDF, not in print. Here, the Liberator our website: www.liberator.org.uk Collective explains why, and how this will work Or send a cheque (UK banks only), payable to RUNNERS AND RIDERS .........................................................................6..7 “Liberator Publications”, together with your name Liberator offers a look at Lib Dem leadership contenders and full postal address, to: NEVER WASTE A CRISIS .......................................................................8..9 Be very afraid, even when coronavirus is over, about what the government will seize Liberator Publications the opportunity to do, says Tony Greaves Flat 1, 24 Alexandra Grove GET LIBERALISM DONE .....................................................................10..11 London N4 2LF The answers to the Liberal Democrats’ plight can all be found in the party’s
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Autumn 2008.Pdf
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 60 / Autumn 2008 / £7.50 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Centenary of the state pension Pat Thane The Old Age Pensions Act, 1908 Andrew Connell ‘The Strange Case of Mr Rigg’ Liberal victor in North Westmorland Report The Lib-Lab Pact David Steel, Tom McNally, Michael Steed ‘Why I Am A Liberal’ Kenneth O. Morgan The dynastic Liberalism of Michael and all the Foots Duncan Brack Campbell as Leader Interview with Menzies Campbell Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 60 Autumn 2008 Journal of Liberal History Issue 60: Autumn 2008 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 The Old Age Pensions Act, 1908 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Pat Thane analyses the introduction and implementation of the first state Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl pensions, brought in one hundred years ago. Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, Letters to the Editor 13 York Membery Pensions and the working class (Martin Pugh); Hastings facts (Patrick Jackson and Paul Hunt); The Master of Elibank (Sandy Waugh); Liberal thinkers (Barry Patrons Stocker) Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Professor John Vincent ‘The Strange Case of Mr Rigg’ 14 The surprise Liberal victor in North Westmorland in the 1900 election proved to Editorial Board be something of a surprise himself; by Andrew Connell Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Dr David Dutton; Professor David Gowland; Dr Richard Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Ian Hunter; Dr Report: Working with others – the Lib-Lab Pact 23 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Party Colours
    Conservatives have blue, Labour have red and Liberal Democrats have yellow – but it wasn’t always like that. Graham Lippiatt examines the history of: LIBERal PARTY ColoURS lections of sorts have been than the intrinsic usefulness This was the case in Liverpool and held in the United Kingdom of the message itself.5 Some of Cumbria and across many parts of Esince the days of the knights this has been driven by election south-east England. The Liberal of the shires and burgesses of the legislation such as the use of party colours in Greenwich (then a two- boroughs.1 These elections were logos on ballot papers6 but it has member parliamentary borough in taking place before universal literacy come about principally as society, Kent), which Gladstone represented (in England; Scotland always had communication technology and from 1868 to 1880, were blue. When much higher literacy rates), even politics have changed and the Gladstone fought Greenwich in among the limited electorates nature of political communication 1874 he fought in blue and his two before the Great Reform Acts and organisation has changed Conservative opponents used of 18322 and during the advances with them. The Conservative crimson, while his Radical running towards the mass democratic state Party tree, the Labour rose or the mate, in honour of his support for of the twentieth century. So it Liberal Democrat freebird will Irish home rule, adopted green.8 was important to ensure that rival be the ubiquitous symbols of each More recently, Liberal colours candidates were properly identified, organisation and candidates and were traditionally blue in Berwick particularly in the days before the literature will be adorned in the on Tweed until changed by Alan secret ballot and the printed ballot same blue, red or yellow colours.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 2001 UK GENERAL ELECTION Lots of Words About Little Change
    PARTY POLITICS VOL 8. No.5 pp. 607–616 Copyright © 2002 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi REVIEW ARTICLE THE 2001 UK GENERAL ELECTION Lots of Words About Little Change Ron Johnston David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh, The British General Election of 2001. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. £52.00/£18.99. 356 pp. ISBN 0 333 740327 (hbk); 0 333 740335 (pbk) Pippa Norris (ed.), Britain Votes 2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. £16.99. 276 pp. ISBN 0 19 851049 7 (pbk) Robert Worcester and Roger Mortimore, Explaining Labour’s Second Landslide. London: Politico’s, 2001. £20.00. 330 pp. ISBN 1 902301 84 6 (hbk) Andrew Geddes and Jonathan Tonge (eds), Labour’s Second Landslide: The British General Election 2001. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002. £15.99. 272 pp. ISBN 0 7190 6266 7 (pbk) Anthony King (ed.) Britain at the Polls, 2001. New York: Chatham House Publishers, 2002. US$23.95. 241 pp. ISBN 1 889 119 74 1 (pbk) 1354-0688(200209)7:4;607–616;027593 PARTY POLITICS 8(5) Time was – before the 1983 general election, which was going to break the mould of British politics but didn’t (but which might have broken British psephology if some political scientists then associated with the Social Science Research Council had had their way!) – when there was just one author to whom we turned to understand what had happened at a UK general election: David Butler. Psephology was a small sub-field of British political science; within it, David Butler had nurtured a few students, several of whom acted as co-authors for particular projects, but his was very much a single – and impressive – voice.
    [Show full text]
  • How We Change the Political System to Change Society
    ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT A PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE How we change the political system to change society Neal Lawson Foreword by Caroline Lucas, Clive Lewis and Layla Moran Published June 2021 by Compass By Neal Lawson About the author: Neal Lawson is Executive Director of Compass. Acknowledgements: The author would like to thank Marie-Caroline Wheatley, Frances Foley, Gabriel Everington, Caroline Lucas, Layla Moran and Clive Lewis for their comments on an early draft of this paper. All errors lie with the author. © Compass All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrievable system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of Compass. 2 All You Need to Know about a Progressive Alliance Please get in touch, join, support and work with us. Write to us at Freepost Compass Email us at [email protected] You can follow us on Twitter @CompassOffice To find out more about Compass, please visit our website: www.compassonline.org.uk/join About Compass and this project Compass is a platform for a good society, a world that is much more equal, sustainable and democratic. We build networks of ideas, parties and organisations to help make systemic change happen. Our strategic focus is to understand, build, support and accelerate new forms of democratic practice and collaborative action that are taking place in civil society and the economy, and to link that up with state reforms and policy.
    [Show full text]
  • In Further Search of 'Orpington Man' In
    REPORT journalism, similar to the more In many and were similarly based on reac- that was done in local organisation, recent ‘Mondeo Man’ and ‘Worces- tions against unpopular govern- the personal appeal of Eric Lubbock ter Woman’. Whereas parties now ways, Orp- ments and a divided Labour Party. and his strong roots in the local have recourse to sophisticated He concluded in agreement with community, and the historic weak- analytic tools which enable them to ington could the ‘ambiguous conclusion’ of Mark ness of the party in Kent – against identify particular subsets of voters Egan, reminding the audience which the later decline of Liberal on a range of characteristics, back be seen as that, although the core vote of the support could be seen as a reversion in 1962 the categorisation was more Conservative and Labour parties to type. straightforwardly geographic. Yet, the proto- declines at every election, the Lib- One audience member recalled the coming together of the new, eral Democrats are not well placed how he had been recruited to young, professional middle class and type of what to capitalise on this. Their voters lifelong Liberal membership by a the Home Counties suburbs did lay has become are less likely to ‘stick’ with them wine and cheese evening during the basis for later Liberal success. from election to election, their pol- the Orpington by-election. He Orpington was also, according the classic icy positions are not well known or emphasised the social aspect of the to Kavanagh, the forerunner of understood, they continue to suffer election, the personal support for two now-familiar electoral phe- pattern of from the electoral system, which Lubbock and the feeling of change nomena: by-elections as referenda penalises parties with an even geo- associated with the ‘Swinging ’60s’.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Steed the Liberal Performan
    The Liberal Performance in 1945 rose most. But since the vast majority of seats did not have a three-cornered fight in both and , it is not easy to As I read the paper by Peter Joyce on The Liberal Party and the establish this as the pattern. General Election and the response by Mark Egan (LDHG Moving forward, it is clear that, wherever the pattern of Newsletter , December ), my psephological hackles rose. contests allows a comparison, the Liberal vote dropped in Tony Greaves’ response (same issue) did not make assumptions and again in ; rose in and , but not up to the (instead it asked intelligent questions), but Joyce’s section on level; briefly surpassed the level in , but fell ‘The Performance of the Liberal Party in the Election’ merely below it again in and . On that basis the popular assessed the performance by describing the outcome in a few response to the Party’s campaign was greater than at six seats while Egan summed up as a ‘grim defeat’. That may out of seven of the elections from to . be a fair reflection of how the results seemed to Party activists More interestingly, the growth areas listed above presage with over-high expectations (in an era when opinion polls did the sort of places in which the Grimond-era revival was to be not provide a benchmark); but if we are to assess the impact of strongest. Orpington man (as she was called in that sexist period) the Liberal Party’s strategy and campaigning in , we must erupted in Eric Lubbock’s byelection victory in ; grapple with the problem of finding a more accurate measure Orpington as a constituency was created in , with the of how the voters reacted to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Support for Third Parties Under Plurality Rule Electoral Systems : a Public Choice Analysis of Britain, Canada, New Zealand and South Korea
    SUPPORT FOR THIRD PARTIES UNDER PLURALITY RULE ELECTORAL SYSTEMS : A PUBLIC CHOICE ANALYSIS OF BRITAIN, CANADA, NEW ZEALAND AND SOUTH KOREA WON-TAEK KANG Thesis presented for Ph.D. at London School of Economics and Political Science UMI Number: U105556 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U105556 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Ti-w^s& S F 7 ^ 2 7 ABSTRACT Why do parties other than major parties survive or even flourish under plurality rule electoral systems, when according to Du verger’s law we should expect them to disappear? Why should rational voters support third parties, even though their chances of being successful are often low ? Using an institutional public choice approach, this study analyses third party voting as one amongst a continuum of choices faced by electors who pay attention both to the ideological proximity of parties, and to their perceived efficacy measured against a community-wide level of minimum efficacy. The approach is applied in detailed case study chapters examining four different third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Realignment the Case of the Liberals
    12 Mavl981 Marxism Todav Liberal gains in council by-elections since Mrs Thatcher was elected Paul Olive to power in Westminster. If this grows to produce a large number of gains in the county council elections, as Liberals everywhere are predicting, the party will be well ahead of the schedule set during the Realignment 1970-74 parliament — it was two to three years after Edward Heath's June 1970 victory that the Liberals reached an earlier peak. In 1973 they fought six by-elections in England, and won three of them. In August that year the Gallup poll registered nearly 30% Liberal the case support. During the 1959-64 Tory government a similar though rather lower and shorter-lived 'Liberal revival' took place. In the spring of 1962, of the 2l/2 years after the October 1959 election, Gallup gave the Liberals 25% in its poll, many council seats were gained, and Eric Lubbock overturned a huge Conservative majority in the Orpington by- Liberals election. A FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT? But is there any reason to suppose that this period of disillusion will mark the end of politics as we have known it, whereas at the 1964 election the Liberals only won nine seats against six in 1959, and in 1974, despite a much increased vote, could only push up from 11 to 14? No one is going to worry unduly if disgruntled Tory voters go off for a brief fling over the next year or two. But we would be very foolish to assume that history moves merely in cycles. To distinguish more fundamental factors from the dramatic ups and downs, we need to look at some longer term trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Thorpe and Norman Scott
    Reviews who finds them guilty.2 In one of the few Jeremy Thorpe and Norman Scott areas in which Buczacki offers some- thing entirely new, he criticises Asquith John Preston, A Very English Scandal: Sex, Lies and a Murder Plot at the as unfaithful in a wider sense to Margot. Heart of the Establishment (Viking, 2016) Asquith liked young women and we are given much more detail on Asquith as Review by Michael Steed a ‘groper’. Buczacki does not comment on the difference in power and status ven if he had never met Norman following his death.1 So when he needed between them. Scott, Jeremy Thorpe would be help with his personal problems, Thorpe He does not criticise Venetia for her Ea controversial figure in Liberal was able to call on the devotion of both contribution to Asquith’s unfaithfulness Party history. His firmly upper-class Bessell and a lifelong personal friend, as she allowed Asquith to make fervent style was strikingly at odds with the David Holmes, to put their energies and assertions of love towards her. Buczacki zeitgeist of the 1960s, and so with the dubious skills at the service of their idol. does not quote Asquith’s letter to her ethos of young recruits to the Liberal The series of unlikely subterfuges and after she assured him that she did not cause who were flocking into the party ultimate (maybe murder) plot may sound want him ever to stop loving her and at that time. Yet his principled stances more like fiction; but I, and others, can wanting her.
    [Show full text]