Jeremy Thorpe, Leader of the Liberal Party from 1967 to 1976, Died Three Weeks Before Christmas 2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jeremy Thorpe, Leader of the Liberal Party from 1967 to 1976, Died Three Weeks Before Christmas 2014 ASSESSING JEREMY ThORPE Jeremy Thorpe, leader of the Liberal Party from 1967 to 1976, died three weeks before Christmas 2014. In the last issue of the Journal of Liberal History (issue 85, winter 2014–15), we carried two articles by Robert Ingham and Ronald Porter commemorating Thorpe’s political career. Several of our readers subsequently wrote to take issue with, or to supplement, the picture of Thorpe’s life and political career they portrayed. Here we carry articles by Michael Steed, Tony Greaves, Andrew Duff and Joyce Arram. 8 Journal of Liberal History 86 Spring 2015 ASSESSING JEREMY ThORPE Jeremy Thorpe – myth and magic The announcement of Jeremy Independent offered an interesting he developed an obsession with the Thorpe’s death on 5 December 2014 and very personal appreciation, idea that Scott was a serious threat, unleashed a wide range of feelings while fighting old battles against even after his pathetic ravings had and claims. the Young Liberals (about whom been dismissed by everyone who The Jeremy fan club came out both he and Thorpe were rather then mattered. Thorpe’s addic- in force, with views from Sir Nick ill-informed). Michael Meadow- tion to risk-taking brought about Harvey (present MP for North croft’s reflections inLiberator were his nemesis. It was close to a case of Devon) that his predecessor had also something of a witness state- political suicide, in which the pas- ‘shaped the political landscape’ to ment, this time about how difficult sengers in the vehicle he piloted (his The Times news report by Lucy Jeremy made it for party officers party) were put recklessly at risk. Fisher, calling him a ‘crucial mod- to do their job, even whilst they It is an interpretation which fits erniser who turned the Liberal were striving to protect the repu- my own encounters with Jeremy Party into a radical force’. But late tation of their leader, or (by 1978 Thorpe. on the evening of 5 December, at the Southport Assembly) that of My own full reflections would BBC Radio 4 broadcast what had their party against the way its for- be coloured by the fact that the originally been put together in 1979 mer leader wanted to drag it down major part of my personal contri- as a documentary by Tom Man- with him. butions to the Liberal cause came gold, scheduled to go out follow- Michael Bloch’s long-awaited during the two decades that Jeremy ing the expected ‘guilty’ verdict at biography was hurriedly (with sat for North Devon, first as the ris- Thorpe’s Old Bailey trial. In this, inadequate time for proper index- ing hope of the Grimond revival, the Thorpe story was presented, checking) published straight after then as my leader for nine years with emphasis on the class character Thorpe’s death, a fascinating and and finally (in the three years fol- of 1960s British society, as an estab- thoroughly researched delve into lowing his resignation as leader) as lishment conspiracy, including con- Jeremy’s psychology, though not a haunting presence still demand- temporary interviews establishing always so reliable on political and ing a leading role in politics. It was early police knowledge of Jeremy’s electoral detail (reviewed by me during this last period that I found risky sex-life, and clear evidence in the Times Literary Supplement, 1 myself, as party president, investi- that the purpose of the plot in April 2015; review in the Journal gating what had happened to large which he was involved was indeed forthcoming). No attempt to evalu- donations secured by Thorpe from to kill his former lover, Norman ate his life and career should now be Jack Hayward for the party – they Scott. The former leader had been a made without taking this magnum turned out to have been used for would-be murderer. opus into account. Bloch is careful legitimate political purposes, but Not surprisingly, the obituaries to reserve judgement on some criti- with loose accounting procedures found it difficult to strike a balance. cal points, e.g. whether the point of Thorpe arrives that would today be outside the Of those I read, the Daily Telegraph’s the plot was to kill Scott or just to at 10 Downing law. was the most comprehensive and scare him into silence. Street for talks That was not the only investi- balanced, while that in The Times Bloch, however, makes a bold with Prime gation I once made into his darker contained most errors and doubt- judgement on Jeremy’s character. Minister Edward side – I saw that when as returning ful judgements (both were anony- He argues that he was a fantasist, Heath, 2 March officer for the 1971 Young Liberal mous). Richard Moore’s in The who needed to live dangerously; 1974 elections I had to deal with (and for Journal of Liberal History 86 Spring 2015 9 AssEssiNG JEREMY THORPE the sake of the party’s reputation had argued for the broadest front If the Liberal bottomless pits for cash and human draw a veil over) his attempt to rig (against Thorpe’s judgement) from effort. It is difficult to identify a those elections to block Peter Hain, 1970 on, and the president-elect, Party organi- single seat which Thorpe’s meth- as Tony Greaves explains below. I Arthur Holt, who made it happen. ods or money made winnable – the am also witness to many occasions The jump from 328 candidates in sation was best case perhaps is the Isle of Ely in which he undermined, bypassed 1970 and the 380 the party had in by-election in 1973. The test in or trampled over party officers, the field on 8 February 1974 to the sometimes the end is what happened to Lib- so weakening the party’s collec- 517 that stood at the general elec- eral representation at Westminster. tive leadership. If the Liberal Party tion on 28 February was achieved ineffective Under Grimond, the party rose organisation was sometimes inef- by the very party officers that from 6 MPs (half of them depend- fective or muddled during his lead- Thorpe liked to bypass; character- or muddled ent on Conservative votes) to 12 ership years, his behaviour bears istically, Jeremy grabbed the credit (all in three-cornered fights); under much responsibility. for the extra votes this produced. during his Thorpe it just limped up from 12 to Yet I also recall a leader of real On 28 February, Labour (which 13. With Steel it went from 13 to 17 passion and deep principle, truly took office) lost more deposits than leadership (or 19 Lib Dems). capable of inspiring. A leader who the Liberals. Further, the myth of Thorpe’s really does bring tangible political We must also put the surge of years, his success hides the real revolution in benefit to his cause can be forgiven February 1974 against the slumps of behaviour targeting. Already in the mid 1950s, a lot of rough handling. So let us June 1970 and October 1974. When some Liberals locally took the view focus on simply what good he did they led the party, both Grimond bears much that the party could win outside for the Liberal Party. and Steel achieved two surges Celtic fringe or traditional areas by He was a superb constituency against one slump; Thorpe’s cam- responsibil- patient, hard work and a long-term Liberal MP, not the first, and cer- paign track record was the worst of commitment. Typically in newer tainly not the last – but a model the three. The party’s misfortune in ity. urban areas, they set about building for many who followed and have the 1970 and October 1974 elections up support through local elections; learned how to cultivate their owed as much to its leader as did the from 1960, that became a national patches and so build up the party’s February 1974 fortune – in particu- strategy. The credit for that goes to Commons representation. lar, his final broadcast in 1970 tell- men (sic) like Richard Wainwright, He has been said to have made ing the electorate that it was about Pratap Chitnis and Michael Mead- an intellectual input. This is absurd, to vote Wilson back into power owcroft, i.e. despised party officers not least as it is what he specifi- (Heath won), so the country needed and generally Thorpe’s opponents. cally claimed not to do. Rather, he a few opposition Liberal MPs. In The fruits were victories in seats claimed that, Jo Grimond having October 1974 he seemed not to not previously within the party’s brought intellectual credibility to know what he was doing; Bloch’s radar: Orpington (1962), Cheadle/ the party, his purpose was to bring revelations on the growing pres- Hazel Grove (1966/74) and Bir- it political credibility. Did he? sures on him at that stage may help mingham Ladywood (1969). By The unexpected six million to explain why. 1970, Trevor Jones, with his inno- Liberal votes cast in February 1974 Those seeking credits for Thor- vative techniques, and the Young suggest some success. Anyone who pe’s leadership point to his focus Liberals, in search of an ideal, knocked on doors then (as I did) on winnable seats, some even see- brought methods and philosophy can witness to the wave of per- ing it as the herald of the party’s together as the community politics sonal support he aroused – similar successful targeting strategy. Yet strategy; many more electoral vic- to Cleggmania in 2010. His style targeting was not new; in the 1950 tories have followed. matched the moment, aided by the election, the student activist Jer- This of course happened on way he led the campaign by press emy had gone (in vain) to the tar- Thorpe’s watch, but he played lit- conferences relayed from Barnsta- get seat of North Dorset to help the tle part in it.
Recommended publications
  • Tony Greaves
    TONY GREAVES An Appreciation Liberal History Group by Michael Meadowcroft Tony Greaves never seemed to age. He had a firm belief that politics was capable of transforming society, and his consistent advocacy of local campaigning, community politics and the necessity for both to be anchored in a radical Liberalism had hardly changed from his Young Liberal days. His election to the Lancashire County Council, in 1973, disqualified him legally from his job teaching geography and from then on to his sudden death almost fifty years later he became one of that committed band of Liberals who put the cause before comfort and struggled to find a succession of jobs that would enable him to keep politics as his first priority. His life before politics captured him was that of a scholarship boy separated from his background by intelligence and an ability to pass exams. Born in Bradford into a family with no direct political involvement, he passed the extremely competitive examination for the direct-grant Bradford Grammar School, but an employment move by his police driving- instructor father took him instead to Queen Elizabeth Grammar School in Wakefield. His successes at ‘O’, ‘A’ and ‘S’ levels enabled him to go to Hertford College, Oxford, and to gain a BA in geography. He followed this with a Diploma in Economic Development at Manchester University. By this time, he had discovered a passion for politics and particularly for political debate. By personality – and influenced by the non-statist radicalism of the then party leader, Jo Grimond – Greaves naturally gravitated to the Liberal cause.
    [Show full text]
  • Paying for the Party
    PX_PARTY_HDS:PX_PARTY_HDS 16/4/08 11:48 Page 1 Paying for the Party Myths and realities in British political finance Michael Pinto-Duschinsky edited by Roger Gough Policy Exchange is an independent think tank whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas which will foster a free society based on strong communities, personal freedom, limited government, national self-confidence and an enterprise culture. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with aca- demics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy out- comes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Tru, stees Charles Moore (Chairman of the Board), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Camilla Cavendish, Robin Edwards, Richard Ehrman, Virginia Fraser, Lizzie Noel, George Robinson, Andrew Sells, Tim Steel, Alice Thomson, Rachel Whetstone PX_PARTY_HDS:PX_PARTY_HDS 16/4/08 11:48 Page 2 About the author Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky is senior Nations, the European Union, Council of research fellow at Brunel University and a Europe, Commonwealth Secretariat, the recognised worldwide authority on politi- British Foreign and Commonwealth cal finance. A former fellow of Merton Office and the Home Office. He was a College, Oxford, and Pembroke College, founder governor of the Westminster Oxford, he is president of the International Foundation for Democracy. In 2006-07 he Political Science Association’s research was the lead witness before the Committee committee on political finance and politi- on Standards in Public Life in its review of cal corruption and a board member of the the Electoral Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Reformers and Liberals: The
    liBERAL paRTY ColoURS the early 1950s when the party Lady Megan no confidence brought following 32 Michael Meadowcroft, b. 1942: Executive was discussing the the decisive British defeat of the Liberal MP for Leeds West 1983–87. matter. The rivalry and antipathy thundered Revolutionary War at the battle of 33 http://www.bramley.demon.co.uk/ between the left-wing Lady Megan Yorktown. liberal.html Lloyd George46 and the more that she 17 Leslie Mitchell, The Whig World: 34 Information to the author from traditional Lady Violet Bonham 1760–1837 (Hambledon Continuum, Michael Meadowcroft, 23 Mar. 2012. Carter was well known. After didn’t care 2005), p. 4. 35 The Times, 13 Oct. 1964, p. 17. going through a number of options 18 Ibid., p. 13. 36 Information to the author from Lady Megan thundered that she what colour 19 Mark Raymond Bonham Carter Michael Meadowcroft, 6 Mar. 2012. didn’t care what colour the party the party (Baron Bonham-Carter), 1922–1994, 37 Information to the author from fought in – as long as it wasn’t grandson of Liberal prime minister Michael Steed, 6 Mar. 2012. violet. fought in – H. H. Asquith. 38 Block, Source Book, p. 78. 20 Mark Pottle (ed.), Daring to Hope: The 39 Lady Violet Bonham Carter, Graham Lippiatt is a Contributing as long as it Diaries and Letters of Violet Bonham Baroness Asquith of Yarnbury Editor to the Journal of Liberal Carter, 1946–69 (Weidenfield and DBE, 1887–1969: daughter of prime History. wasn’t violet. Nicolson, 2000), pp. 199–200. minister H. H.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberals in Coalition
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 72 / Autumn 2011 / £10.00 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Liberals in coalition Vernon Bogdanor Riding the tiger The Liberal experience of coalition government Ian Cawood A ‘distinction without a difference’? Liberal Unionists and Conservatives Kenneth O. Morgan Liberals in coalition, 1916–1922 David Dutton Liberalism and the National Government, 1931–1940 Matt Cole ‘Be careful what you wish for’ Lessons of the Lib–Lab Pact Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 72 Autumn 2011 new book from tHe History Group for details, see back page Journal of Liberal History issue 72: Autumn 2011 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 Riding the tiger: the Liberal experience of 4 Editor: Duncan Brack coalition government Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl Assistant Editor: Siobhan Vitelli Vernon Bogdanor introduces this special issue of the Journal Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Coalition before 1886 10 Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, York Membery Whigs, Peelites and Liberals: Angus Hawkins examines coalitions before 1886 Patrons A ‘distinction without a difference’? 14 Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Ian Cawood analyses how the Liberal Unionists maintained a distinctive Professor John Vincent identity from their Conservative allies, until coalition in 1895 Editorial Board The coalition of 1915–1916 26 Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Prelude to disaster: Ian Packer examines the Asquith coalition of 1915–16, Dr David Dutton; Prof. David Gowland; Prof. Richard which brought to an end the last solely Liberal government Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Dr J.
    [Show full text]
  • Thecoalition
    The Coalition Voters, Parties and Institutions Welcome to this interactive pdf version of The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Please note that in order to view this pdf as intended and to take full advantage of the interactive functions, we strongly recommend you open this document in Adobe Acrobat. Adobe Acrobat Reader is free to download and you can do so from the Adobe website (click to open webpage). Navigation • Each page includes a navigation bar with buttons to view the previous and next pages, along with a button to return to the contents page at any time • You can click on any of the titles on the contents page to take you directly to each article Figures • To examine any of the figures in more detail, you can click on the + button beside each figure to open a magnified view. You can also click on the diagram itself. To return to the full page view, click on the - button Weblinks and email addresses • All web links and email addresses are live links - you can click on them to open a website or new email <>contents The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Edited by: Hussein Kassim Charles Clarke Catherine Haddon <>contents Published 2012 Commissioned by School of Political, Social and International Studies University of East Anglia Norwich Design by Woolf Designs (www.woolfdesigns.co.uk) <>contents Introduction 03 The Coalition: Voters, Parties and Institutions Introduction The formation of the Conservative-Liberal In his opening paper, Bob Worcester discusses Democratic administration in May 2010 was a public opinion and support for the parties in major political event.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Historic Section 0 What the General Election Numbers Mean - Michael Steed 0 Runners and Riders for Next Leader
    0 Liberator at 50 - special historic section 0 What the general election numbers mean - Michael Steed 0 Runners and Riders for next leader Issue 400 - April 2020 £ 4 Issue 400 April 2020 SUBSCRIBE! CONTENTS Liberator magazine is published six/seven times per year. Commentary.............................................................................................3 Subscribe for only £25 (£30 overseas) per year. Radical Bulletin .........................................................................................4..5 You can subscribe or renew online using PayPal at ALL GOOD THINGS COME TO AN END ............................................5 You’ll soon by seeing Liberator only as a free PDF, not in print. Here, the Liberator our website: www.liberator.org.uk Collective explains why, and how this will work Or send a cheque (UK banks only), payable to RUNNERS AND RIDERS .........................................................................6..7 “Liberator Publications”, together with your name Liberator offers a look at Lib Dem leadership contenders and full postal address, to: NEVER WASTE A CRISIS .......................................................................8..9 Be very afraid, even when coronavirus is over, about what the government will seize Liberator Publications the opportunity to do, says Tony Greaves Flat 1, 24 Alexandra Grove GET LIBERALISM DONE .....................................................................10..11 London N4 2LF The answers to the Liberal Democrats’ plight can all be found in the party’s
    [Show full text]
  • A Very English Scandal Ep.2 Prod Script Amended 27.11.17 GR
    A VERY ENGLISH SCANDAL EPISODE TWO by Russell T Davies SHOOTING SCRIPT 28.09 PINK AMENDMENTS 03.10 BLUE AMENDMENTS 04.10 GREEN AMENDMENTS 25.10 YELLOW AMENDMENTS 31.10 SALMON AMENDMENTS 08.11 GOLDEN ROD AMENDMENTS 27.11 Based on the book by John Preston 1 INT. COMMONS CHAMBER - DAY 1 JEREMY on his feet, to a packed House. A firebrand. JEREMY I regard it as immoral! This country continues to supply arms to Nigeria, while no food has been able to reach these people since the 10th of June. And who takes advantage of this? Soviet Russia! The Russians have been growing in strength within Nigeria with every passing day - the world should see this! The world should know! CUT TO: 2 INT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, CENTRAL LOBBY - DAY 2 MINUTES LATER, the session ended, the lobby full, JEREMY striding through, PETER BESSELL trotting after him, alarmed, as Jeremy returns to his greatest passion of the moment: JEREMY The real question is, where to dispose of the body? In New York, they drop corpses in the river. CUT TO: 3 INT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, STAIRCASE - DAY 3 JEREMY and BESSELL now hurrying upstairs. JEREMY I’ve read, you can seal a body in concrete at the base of a motorway. CUT TO: 4 INT. JEREMY’S LEADER’S OFFICE - DAY 4 JEREMY striding towards his office, BESSELL following - JEREMY Tin mines! That’s the solution. David! Ready for you now. Waiting outside the office, now jumping to his feet, is DAVID HOLMES, 40s, northern, a solid, bluff man, heavy glasses; a good, blunt, down-to-earth contrast to these MPs.
    [Show full text]
  • 36/Autumn 2002
    Journal of Issue 36 / Autumn 2002 / £4.00 Liberal DemocratHISTORY One Liberal’s war David Dutton One Liberal’s war Richard Durning Holt and Liberal politics 1914–18 Tom Dale and Robert Ingham The Lord Chancellor who never was Biography of Norman Birkett R. Ian Elder The Young Scots Society A lost Liberal legion Adrian Slade What might have been Interview with John Pardoe Larry Iles and Robert Ingham The first woman Liberal MP Biography of Margaret Wintringham Liberal Democrat History Group Issue 36: Autumn 2002 Journal of Liberal Democrat History The Journal of Liberal Democrat History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. 3 One Liberal’s war ISSN 1463-6557 Editor: Duncan Brack Richard Durning Holt and Liberal politics 1914–18; by David Dutton Deputy Editor: Sarah Taft Assistant Editor: Alison Smith Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham 9 The Lord Chancellor who never was Reviews Editor: Sam Crooks Tom Dale and Robert Ingham examine the career of the leading Liberal lawyer Patrons Norman Birkett (1883–1962) Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Professor Earl Russell; Professor John Vincent 13 The Young Scots Society Editorial Board A lost Liberal legion remembered by R. Ian Elder Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Dr David Dutton; Professor David Gowland; Dr Richard Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; 16 What might have been Peter Hellyer; Ian Hunter; Dr J. Graham Jones; Tony Little; Professor Ian Machin; Dr Mark Pack; Adrian Slade looks back with John PardoePardoe, Liberal MP for North Cornwall, 1966–79 Dr John Powell; Iain Sharpe 19 The first woman Liberal MP Editorial/Correspondence Contributions to the Journal – letters, articles, Larry Iles and Robert Ingham take a look at the life and political career of Margaret and book reviews – are invited.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford, 1984); H
    Notes Notes to the Introduction I. K. O. Morgan, Labour in Power, 194~1951 (Oxford, 1984); H. Pelling, The Labour Governments, 194~51 (London, 1984); A. Cairncross, Years of Recovery: British Economic Policy, 194~51 (London, 1985); P. Hen­ nessy, Never Again: Britain, 194~1951 (London, 1992). 2. J. Saville, The Labour Movement in Britain (London, 1988); J. Fyrth (ed.), Labour's High Noon: The Government and the Economy, 194~51 (London, 1993). 3. C. Barnett, The Audit oj War: The Illusion and Reality of Britain as a Great Nation (London, 1986); The Lost Victory: British Dreams, British Realities, 194~1950 (London, 1995). 4. Symposium, 'Britain's Postwar Industrial Decline', Contemporary Record, 1: 2 (1987), pp. 11-19; N. Tiratsoo (ed.), The Altlee Years (London, 1991). 5. J. Tomlinson, 'Welfare and the Economy: The Economic Impact of the Welfare State, 1945-1951', Twentieth-Century British History, 6: 2 (1995), pp. 194--219. 6. Hennessy, Never Again, p. 453. See also M. Francis, 'Economics and Ethics: the Nature of Labour's Socialism, 1945-1951', Twentieth­ Century British History, 6: 2 (1995), pp. 220--43. 7. S. Fielding, P. Thompson and N. Tiratsoo, 'England Arise!' The Labour Party and Popular Politics in 1940s Britain (Manchester, 1995), pp. 209- 18. 8. P. Kellner, 'It Wasn't All Right,Jack', Sunday Times, 4 April 1993. See also The Guardian, 9 September 1993. 9. For a summary of the claims made by the political parties, see J. Barnes and A. Seldon, '1951-64: 13 W asted Years?', Contemporary Record, 1: 2 (1987). 10. V. Bogdanor and R.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Autumn 2008.Pdf
    For the study of Liberal, SDP and Issue 60 / Autumn 2008 / £7.50 Liberal Democrat history Journal of LiberalHI ST O R Y Centenary of the state pension Pat Thane The Old Age Pensions Act, 1908 Andrew Connell ‘The Strange Case of Mr Rigg’ Liberal victor in North Westmorland Report The Lib-Lab Pact David Steel, Tom McNally, Michael Steed ‘Why I Am A Liberal’ Kenneth O. Morgan The dynastic Liberalism of Michael and all the Foots Duncan Brack Campbell as Leader Interview with Menzies Campbell Liberal Democrat History Group 2 Journal of Liberal History 60 Autumn 2008 Journal of Liberal History Issue 60: Autumn 2008 The Journal of Liberal History is published quarterly by the Liberal Democrat History Group. ISSN 1479-9642 The Old Age Pensions Act, 1908 4 Editor: Duncan Brack Pat Thane analyses the introduction and implementation of the first state Deputy Editor: Tom Kiehl pensions, brought in one hundred years ago. Biographies Editor: Robert Ingham Reviews Editor: Dr Eugenio Biagini Contributing Editors: Graham Lippiatt, Tony Little, Letters to the Editor 13 York Membery Pensions and the working class (Martin Pugh); Hastings facts (Patrick Jackson and Paul Hunt); The Master of Elibank (Sandy Waugh); Liberal thinkers (Barry Patrons Stocker) Dr Eugenio Biagini; Professor Michael Freeden; Professor John Vincent ‘The Strange Case of Mr Rigg’ 14 The surprise Liberal victor in North Westmorland in the 1900 election proved to Editorial Board be something of a surprise himself; by Andrew Connell Dr Malcolm Baines; Dr Roy Douglas; Dr Barry Doyle; Dr David Dutton; Professor David Gowland; Dr Richard Grayson; Dr Michael Hart; Peter Hellyer; Ian Hunter; Dr Report: Working with others – the Lib-Lab Pact 23 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Party Colours
    Conservatives have blue, Labour have red and Liberal Democrats have yellow – but it wasn’t always like that. Graham Lippiatt examines the history of: LIBERal PARTY ColoURS lections of sorts have been than the intrinsic usefulness This was the case in Liverpool and held in the United Kingdom of the message itself.5 Some of Cumbria and across many parts of Esince the days of the knights this has been driven by election south-east England. The Liberal of the shires and burgesses of the legislation such as the use of party colours in Greenwich (then a two- boroughs.1 These elections were logos on ballot papers6 but it has member parliamentary borough in taking place before universal literacy come about principally as society, Kent), which Gladstone represented (in England; Scotland always had communication technology and from 1868 to 1880, were blue. When much higher literacy rates), even politics have changed and the Gladstone fought Greenwich in among the limited electorates nature of political communication 1874 he fought in blue and his two before the Great Reform Acts and organisation has changed Conservative opponents used of 18322 and during the advances with them. The Conservative crimson, while his Radical running towards the mass democratic state Party tree, the Labour rose or the mate, in honour of his support for of the twentieth century. So it Liberal Democrat freebird will Irish home rule, adopted green.8 was important to ensure that rival be the ubiquitous symbols of each More recently, Liberal colours candidates were properly identified, organisation and candidates and were traditionally blue in Berwick particularly in the days before the literature will be adorned in the on Tweed until changed by Alan secret ballot and the printed ballot same blue, red or yellow colours.
    [Show full text]
  • 40-Autumn 2003.Indd
    Adrian Slade talks to former Liberal leader David Steel (Lord Steel of Aikwood) about his career in politics, from his election in 1965, through his period as leader of the Liberal Party from 1976 to 1988 to his recent role as Presiding Officer of the Scottish Parliament. ARCHITECT OF POLITICAL REALISM or all the high hopes of been afraid to take risks and court which had a deep effect on me, Jo Grimond’s ‘Liberal controversy. His introduction of and I joined the Anti-Apartheid Revival’, only three the 1967 Abortion Bill; his crea- Movement that was formed as a by-elections were tion of the 1976 Lib–Lab Pact; his result. Also, much influenced by actually won by the encouragement of the formation Jo Grimond, who was rector of FLiberal Party of the 1960s. The of the SDP; his proposed alliance the university and actually intro- most significant for the future with the new party; his ultimate duced me to my future wife, Judy, was Roxburgh, Selkirk & Peebles, strong advocacy of Liberal–SDP I joined the Liberals.’ where, in 1965, 26-year-old David merger: all have made him John Pardoe and Roy Jenkins Steel, ‘Boy David’ as he quickly enemies, even if those enemies had at different times suggested became known, won the seat with are heavily outnumbered by his that David Steel was always more a 4,500 majority over the Tory. supporters. But, on each occasion, of Social Democrat than a Liberal. Unlike the other by-election events have tended to vindicate How true was that? ‘Oh, Jo jok- victors, Eric Lubbock and Wal- him, and his place in history as ingly suggested it too, at the time lace Lawler, Steel’s majority just the Liberal Party’s architect of of the Alliance,’ he says.
    [Show full text]