Section 1.1: Basic Concepts of Measurements and Methods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 1.1: Basic Concepts of Measurements and Methods Section 1.1: Basic Concepts of Measurements and Methods" (Chapter 1: Beckwith Chaps. 1-2) • Encyclopedia Encarta In classical physics and engineering, measurement generally refers to the process of estimating or determining the ratio of a magnitude of a quantitative property or relation to a unit of the same type of quantitative property or relation. Process of measurement involves the comparison of physical quantities of objects or phenomena … MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 1 What is a Measurement? (2) • Wikipedia Measurement is the estimation or determination of extent, dimension or capacity, usually in relation to some standard or unit of measurement. MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 2 Comparison to a Standard (Metrology) • Metrology is the study of measurement. -In general, a metric is a scale of measurement defined in terms of a standard: i.e. in terms of well-defined unit. - If one says I am 5, that person is indicating a measurement without supplying an applicable standard. -They could mean I am 5 years old or I am 5 feet high. -Measurements are at best ambiguous, or at worst, meaningless, with out units! MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 3 Units of Measure • What is a Unit of Measure? -Act of measuring involves comparing the magnitude of a quantity possessed by an object with a standard unit by using an instrument What are under controlled conditions. These gages Reading? -Examples of measuring instruments include Thermometer (Deg.) Current Meter (Amps) Without Pressure Sensor (psi) Prior Knowledge Of units we have No idea! MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 4 Units of Measure (3) • Same quantity, .. Different units MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 5 Units of Measure (4) • Systems of Units Imperial (English) • Before SI units were widely adopted around the world, the British systems of English units and later Imperial units were used in Britain, the Commonwealth and the United States. The system came to be known as U.S. customary units in the United States. • Sometimes called foot-pound-second systems after the Imperial units for distance, weight (mass), and time. MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 6 Units of Measure (5) • Systems of Units Metric (MKS) • The metric system is a decimalised system of measurement based on the Meter (M), kilogram (K), and second (S). • The main advantage of the metric system is that is has a single base unit for each physical quantity. All other units are powers of ten or multiples of ten of this base unit. • Unit conversions are always simple because they will be in the ratio of ten, one hundred, one thousand, etc. • Also referred to as Systeme International (SI) Units MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 7 Fundamental Units of Measure • A system of measurement is a set of units which can be used to specify anything which can be measured. Some quantities are designated as fundamental units meaning all other needed units can be derived from them. • Historically a wide range of units were used for the same quantity; for example, in several cultural settings, length was measured in inches, feet, yards, fathoms, rods, chains, furlongs, miles, nautical miles, leagues, with conversion factors which are not simple powers of ten or even always simple fractions. MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 8 Fundamental Units of Measure (2) • This disagreement of units had serious military, cultural, and Fiscal impacts and eventually the British Royal Society headed by Michael Faraday adopted 3 fundamental Units, distance (ft), weight (lb), and time (sec). • Later (1824) it was determined to be more fundamental to substitute Mass (slug) for weight (lb) as a fundamental unit of measure MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 9 Fundamental Units of Measure (3) • In the 19th century, science developments showed that either electric charge or electric current must be added to complete the minimum set of fundamental quantities. • Mesures usuelles (French for customary measurements) were a system of measurement introduced to act as compromise between metric system and traditional measurements. • This system of measures would eventually lead to the Evolution of the modern SI system of measurements MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 10 Fundamental Units of Measure, SI system • The SI system is founded on 8 fundamental units. All other Units can be derived from these quantities. MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 11 Derived Units of Measure, SI system • Derived units are algebraic combinations of the eight base units with some of the combinations being assigned special names and symbols. MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 12 Derived Units of Measure, SI system (cont’d) MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 13 Conversion of Units of Measure • Although the Imperial System of units is gradually being Replaced by SI system, these units are still in common use Amongst U.S. defense contractors , and NASA! • This use of the Imperial system is especially prevalent For mechanical units like distance, force, moments of inertia, pressure, and volume. • Accurate conversion from one system to another is Essential! MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 14 Conversion of Units of Measure (1) • Not Important?! The Mars Climate Orbiter (1998) was destroyed when a navigation error caused the spacecraft to miss its intended 150 km altitude above Mars during orbit insertion. Instead the spacecraft entered the Martian atmosphere at about 57 km altitude. The spacecraft was destroyed by atmospheric stresses and friction at this low altitude. MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 15 Conversion of Units of Measure (2) • Not Important?! A review board found that thruster impulse data wer calculated on the ground in Imperial units (pound-seconds) and reported that way to the navigation team, who were expecting the data in metric units (newton-seconds) Anticipating a different set of units, systems aboard the spacecraft were not able to reconcile the two systems of measurement, resulting in the navigation error and loss of spacecraft! MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 16 Conversion of Units of Measure (3) • Not Important?! • This calculation just saved $300 million dollars! MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 17 Conversion of Units of Measure (4) • Careful with English units! • Pounds-mass (lbm) is not a fundamental unit of measurement! • Metric • English -- pounds mass (lbm) and pounds force (lbf) do not cancel MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 18 Dimensional Analysis • Most physical quantities can be expressed in terms of combinations of sin basic dimensions. These are Fundamental Fundamental Quantity Symbol MKS Unit Imperial Unit Mass M kg slug Length L m ft Time t s s Temperature T o K o R Electric Current I Amp Amp Luminous Intensity J cd cd •Dimensions aren't the same as units. I.e. the physical quantity, speed, may be measured in units of meters per second, knots … ; but regardless of the units used, speed is always a distance divided a time, so we say that the dimensions of speed are distance divided by time, or instantaneously dL/dt. MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 19 Dimensional Analysis (2) • In same manner, dimensions of area are D2 …. area can always be calculated as a distance in one direction times a Perpendicular direction …. area of a circle --> πr2 is really a result of the integral [1/2 Length of arc] x [height of triangle] MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 20 Dimensional Analysis (3) • Simple Dimensional Analysis Example MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 21 Dimensional Analysis (4) • More Complex Dimensional Analysis Example MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 22 Dimensional Analysis (5) • In algebraic expression, additive terms must have same dimensions. --> each term on the left-hand side of an equation must have the same dimensions as each term on the right-hand side. "a" must have the same dimensions as the product "bc", and "(1/2)xy" must also have the same dimensions as "a" and "bc". Equation is dimensionally correct when terms have consistent dimensionality Dimensional analysis is a valuable tool for validating the “correctness” of an algebraic derivation … i.e. finding algebra errors MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 23 Dimensional Analysis (6) More complex examples Source: http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/tutorials/dimanaly/dimanaly_ans7.html, Cited 12-22-06 MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 24 Dimensional Analysis Example (1) • Relationship Between pressure, temperature, and density derived empirically in Modern form by John Dalton • Numerical Values for Universal Gas Constant Ru = 1545.40 ft-lbf/°R-(lbm-mole) Ru = 49722.01 ft-lbf/°R-(slug-mole) Ru = 8314.4126 J/°K-(kg-mole) p V = n Ru T • p - pressure acting on gas • V - volume of gas in system • n - Number of moles of gas in system • Ru - Universal gas constant • T - Temperature of gas John Dalton 1-mole --> 6.02 x 1023 MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS Avagadro's number 25 Dimensional Analysis Example (2) • p - pascal MKS units analysis • V - cubic meter • n - Number of moles of gas in system • Ru - Universal gas constant, Ru = 8314.4126 J/°K-(kg-mole) • T - Temperature of gas, °K MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 26 Another Example: Specific Impulse (1) • Specific Impulse is a scalable characterization of a rocket’s Ability to deliver a certain (specific) impulse for a given weight of propellant Mean specific impulse MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 27 Another Example: Specific Impulse (2) MAE 3340 INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEMS 28 More Dimensional Analysis Examples Fundamental Fundamental Quantity Symbol MKS Unit Imperial Unit Mass M kg slug Length L m ft Time t s s Temperature T o K o R • Pressure Electric Current
Recommended publications
  • Dien Mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-Hist
    Druckerei C.H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist. Abh. 136 ..................................... Revision, 20.12.2010 BAYERISCHE AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN PHILOSOPHISCH-HISTORISCHE KLASSE ABHANDLUNGEN . NEUE FOLGE, HEFT 136 Revision Cornelia Meyer-Stoll Die Maß- und Gewichtsreformen in Deutschland im 19. Jahrhundert unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rolle Carl August Steinheils und der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Vorgelegt von Knut Borchardt in der Sitzung vom 7. Mai 2010 MÜNCHEN 2010 VERLAG DER BAYERISCHEN AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN IN KOMMISSION BEIM VERLAG C. H. BECK MÜNCHEN Druckerei C.H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist. Abh. 136 ..................................... Revision, 20.12.2010 ISSN 0005–710X ISBN 978 3 7696 0124 4 © Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, München 2010 Gesamtherstellung: Druckerei C. H. Beck, Nördlingen Gedruckt auf säurefreiem, alterungsbeständigem Papier (hergestellt aus chlorfrei gebleichtem Zellstoff) Printed in Germany Druckerei C.H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist. Abh. 136 ..................................... Revision, 21.12.2010 Ludwig Thiersch: Carl August Ritter von Steinheil (1801–1870) Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Revision Druckerei C.H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist. Abh. 136 ..................................... Revision, 21.12.2010 Druckerei C. H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft .................Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist..................... Abh. 136 Revision, 17.12.2010
    [Show full text]
  • Maße & Gewichte
    Maße & Gewichte Die Geschichte der Maße und Gewichte Inhaltsverzeichnis 0.1 Geschichte der Maße und Gewichte .................................. 1 0.1.1 Überblick ........................................... 1 0.1.2 Längeneinheiten ....................................... 1 0.1.3 Gewichtseinheiten ...................................... 1 0.1.4 Beispiel der Vielfalt ..................................... 1 0.1.5 Einheiten für Zeit und Winkel ................................ 2 0.1.6 Angelsächsische Maßeinheiten ................................ 2 0.1.7 Das metrische System .................................... 3 0.1.8 Typografische Maßeinheiten ................................. 3 0.1.9 Listen von historischen Maßen und Gewichten ........................ 3 0.1.10 Gebräuchliche Masseeinheiten ................................ 4 0.1.11 Siehe auch .......................................... 4 0.1.12 Literatur ........................................... 4 0.1.13 Weblinks ........................................... 4 0.1.14 Einzelnachweise ....................................... 5 1 Die Anfänge des Messens in der Frühzeit des Menschen 6 1.1 Kognitive Archäologie ......................................... 6 1.1.1 Entstehung .......................................... 6 1.1.2 Kognitive Archäologie heute ................................. 6 1.1.3 Kognitive Archäologie im deutschsprachigen Raum ..................... 7 1.1.4 Kognitive Archäologie in der Diskussion ........................... 7 1.1.5 Literatur ........................................... 7 1.1.6
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the National Bureau of Standards
    APPENDIX A FERDINAND RUDOLPH HASSLER First Superintendent of the Coast Survey and of Weights and Measures When Professor Stratton arrived at the Office of Weights and Measures on B Street in Washington in the spring of 1898 to survey its equipment and operations, he found there in the person of Louis A. Fischer, the adjuster, a link with Ferdinand Rudolph Hassler, the first Superintendent of Weights and Measures in the Federal Government. It was in the atmosphere of the office over which Hassler had presided, Stratton said, with its sacred traditions concerning standards, its unsurpassed instrument shop, its world-known experts in the construction and comparison of standards, and especially in the most precise measurement of length and mass, that the boy Fischer, scarcely over 16, found himself when he entered the employ of Govern- ment in a minor capacity [about the year 18801. * * Scarcely 40 years had passed since the end of Hassler's services and the beginning of Fischer's. His first instructors were the direct disciples of Hassler and he knew and talked with those who had come in personal contact with the first superintendent.1 Fischer's reminiscences concerning the early historyof the Weights and Measures office, gathered from his association with the successors of Hassler, were never recorded, to Stratton's regret, and the only biography of Hassler, by Florian Cajori, professor of mathematics at the University of California, centers on his career in the Coast Survey gathered from his association with the successors of Hassler, were never recorded, to in the history of science in the Federal Government, is the principal source of the present sketch.2 1 Stratton, "Address Memorializing Louis Albert Fischer, 1864.—1921," 15th Annual Con.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen Mihm Associate Professor of History University of Georgia 7 November 2014
    THE STANDARDS OF THE STATE: WEIGHTS, MEASURES, AND NATION MAKING IN THE EARLY AMERICAN REPUBLIC Stephen Mihm Associate Professor of History University of Georgia 7 November 2014 “State Formations: Histories and Cultures of Statehood” Center for Historical Research at the Ohio State University Do Not Cite or Quote without Permission In January 1830, a committee appointed by the Delaware House of Representatives filed a report to the larger General Assembly. The committee, created in response to a petition praying that the Delaware state government do something to establish “uniform weights and measures,” deemed it “inexpedient to make any legislative enactment upon this subject.” Their argument for inaction, laid out in great detail, reveals something about the fault lines of federalism at this time. “Congress alone can remedy the evils under which we labor, for want of a uniform standard,” they observed: Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution explicitly gave Congress the power to “fix the standard of weights and measures.” But Congress, while possessor of this prerogative, had declined to act, despite entreaties to do so. The committee ruefully reported that while “a great variety of useful and curious learning has been developed” as Congress grappled with the problem, “no law has yet been enacted by that body, to fix that standard.” The individual states, the committee reported, had acted, despite the questionable constitutionality of doing so. Each established their own weights and measures, driven by whatever their “particular circumstances seemed to require.” As a consequence, observed the committee, “scarcely any two States agree in their standards of weights and measures.” A small state like Delaware, overshadowed by the large commercial cities of Baltimore and Philadelphia, followed at least two – and likely many more – sets of standards, all of them at variance with each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrication Leaders Guide 2009
    Metrication Leaders Guide This resource book will help make your inevitable upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast. Pat Naughtin 2009 2 of 89 Make your upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast Decision making for metrication leaders !! " ! # $ Appendices % & % ! !! ' ! ( )% ' !* " " + , -&..)--/& , - ,$ # ! ,, 0 * + # ( http://metricationmatters.com [email protected] 3 of 89 Make your upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast. Deciding on a metrication program confirms that you are a metrication leader – not a follower. You have the courage to stand aside from the crowd, decide what you think is best for yourself and for others, and you are prepared to differ from other people in your class, your work group, your company, or your industry. As a metrication leader, you will soon discover three things: 1 Metrication is technically a simple process. 2 Metrication doesn't take long if you pursue a planned and timed program. 3 Metrication can provoke deeply felt anti-metrication emotions in people who have had no measurement experience with metric measures, or people who have difficulty with change. The first two encourage confidence – it's simple and it won't take long – but the third factor can give you an intense feeling of isolation when you first begin your metrication program. You feel you are learning a new language (you are – a new measuring language), while people around you not only refuse to learn this language, but will do what they can to prevent you from growing and from making progressive developments in your life. The purpose of this book is to give you some supporting arguments to use in your metrication process.
    [Show full text]
  • Instruction Sur Les Poids Et Mesures Républicaines : Déduites De La
    - I.t>-n :^.J\* m#^> CJ^i^r^ , INSTRUCTION s U R L E s POIDS ET MESURES RÉPUBLICAINES, DÉDUITES DE LA GRANDEUR DELATERRE, UNIEORMES POUR TOUTE LA RÉPUBLIQUE, JLi sur les calculs relatifs à leur dwision décimale /. Parla Commission temporaire des Poids et Mesures répuJ^licaines En exécution des décrets de la Convention nationaLe. A PARIS, DE l'i m P R I m E R I E pu DÉPÔT DES LOIS., Place de la B_éunion. Ad IP. de la E.é]:i;bliqiie , une et indivisible. ,2 ^^\ ^ Oot^' TABLE ; Des articles conlenus dans cette Instruction. Uî s G b U P. S PRÉLIMINAIRE ZX, PREMIÈRE PARTIE. Système des Mesures déduites de la grandeur de la Terre pag. i 1 ]N"OTIONS PRELIMINAIRES SUR LES MESIjRE;S, ibid, I. Des mesures linéaires 6. Détermination de Vunité des Mesures li- néaires. g. Nouvelle dii^isLon de la circonférence du Cercle .,.,.... ij. avantages des nouvelles Mesures lo. Expérience du Pendule 22. Nouvelle dii^ision de la durée du jour, . 28. Description de Vétalon du mètre et des principales mesures usuelles de longueur. 29, II. Des mesures agraires 3j. IIL Des mesures de capacité 33. IV. Des poids. ........ .^ ^3. Détermination de l'unité de Poids .... 44. Divisions et sousdii^isions de Vuniié de Foids. A^^ a i] iV Table. V, Des monnoies» ...'..... .'. ". pag, !>4, SECONDE PAP.TIE, CalcLiL leLatlf à La divisioa déci^ maie des Mesures déduites de La grandeur de La Terre 55, HOTIOKS PRÉLIMINAIRES ibid. Table des abréi^iaiions des noms de Me- sures et de Poids ôy. I, De la manière d'exprimer en chiffres LES RÉSULTATS DES OPÉRATIONS SUR LES nouvelles MESURES .
    [Show full text]
  • Changes of Forests in Czechoslovakia
    Changes of Forests In Czechoslovakia V. PERINA Ministry of Agriculture, Prague, Czechoslovakia In the territory of Central Europe, and, consequently, because it did not take into consideration the biological in Czechoslovakia, there has occurred in the last two requirements of individual tree species. centuries a substantial change in the species composition A substantialchangeoftreespeciescomposition of the forests.This change was caused by an economic- occurred in the territory of Bohemia, situated, from the historical situation in this country. In the areas of relatively phytogeographical point of view, in the Hercynian range. dense population the timber consumption increasedpro- At the present time, the Norway spruce here covers over portionally with the development of industry, so that the 62,5%, and the Scotch pine over 19,7% of the total high timber resources in the forests were successively reduced. forest area. The broadleaved species cover only 13,2% Artificial regeneration was not regulated, and natural of the area. In the eastern part of Czechoslovakia, i.e., regeneration was, in those times, hindered to a great in Slovakia, which belongs to the Carpathian range, and degree by grazing. where industry was not developed to such a great extent Timber scarcity and the unfavorable state of forests as in Bohemia and timber consumption was less important, were such that various ways for the improvement of no substantial change of species composition occurred. forestry were sought, in order to ensure a sufficient quan- Here, high forests are composed primarily of broadleaved tity of timber. One of those ways was, especially at the species (54,8%), whereas conifers occupy only 45,2% close of the 18th and in the 19th century, the establish- of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Metrication?
    What is metrication? Pat Naughtin Metrication is the process of upgrading from any of the many and various old pre-metric measurement methods to the modern metric system, which is technically known as The International System of Units (SI). Metrication began in France in the 1790s and then spread rapidly to all other nations in the world. Gradually, through the 1800s, the metric system replaced all of the numerous old historical weighing and measuring methods. By 1900, almost all nations had passed laws that accepted the metric system for use in trade, and during the late 1800s this usually translated into widespread use of the metric system by the public. The metric system is now used by all of the world's people in all nations. The philosopher, Condorcet, proved to be correct when, in 1791, he described the original metric system as: For all people; for all time. As examples, the USA has allowed metric measuring units since 1866, and the UK since 1873. Liberia and Myanmar are the only nations that have not yet passed specific metric laws but the metric system is used in both of those countries every day. Only in France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America has there been any significant opposition to metrication, the main objections being based on history, tradition, aesthetics, economic conjecture, and a personal distaste for foreign ideas. In France and Japan the opposition faded as soon as people regularly used the metric system. This left only two nations, the UK and the USA, with citizens who have difficulty accepting the reality of worldwide metrication.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Made to Measure
    Made in Britain: Not made to measure. Ronnie Cohen © 2011 Ronnie Cohen. All rights reserved. 1 Table of Contents Foreword...............................................................................................................................................5 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................6 Central Role of Measurement in Daily Life.........................................................................................7 Why Measurement Matters..................................................................................................................8 Quest for Honest Measurements since Ancient Times.........................................................................9 Measurement Facts: Did you know that....?.......................................................................................10 Description of the British Imperial System........................................................................................11 Introduction to the British Imperial System..............................................................................11 Units of Length..........................................................................................................................11 Units of Area.............................................................................................................................11 Units of Volume........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Metrication Is SUCCESSFUL
    Metrication is SUCCESSFUL Metrication is SUCCESSFUL because it is: Simple The modern metric system, formally known as the International System of Units (SI), is the simplest and easiest-to-use system of measurement ever devised. In fact the metric system is the only system of measurement ever devised. All previous measuring methods were just a hodge-podge of randomly generated local measures. Unique The metric system is unique. Never before, has there been a method of measurement that has all the positive benefits as SI. Coherent The metric system uses the same decimal nature as our number system, and it uses the same mathematical rules and symbols that we use for the mathematic of numbers Capable The metric system is capable of measuring anything in any trade, profession, or other human activity. The metric system has no limitations. For example, you might measure the distance from here to the door in metres, the distance from between your home and your work in kilometres, the width of your little finger nail in millimetres, the diameter of the hairs on your head in micrometres, and the size of one of your cells in nanometres. Why stop there? With the SI prefixes, there is more than enough flexibility to measure from the size of sub-atomic particles – the diameter of an electron is about 6 femtometres – to the size of the whole Universe – the diameter of the Universe, as observed by the world's best telescopes, is about 250 yottametres. Equitable The key argument for using the metric system is that it is fair to all concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Essence of the Metric System
    Outline of the metric system - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_the_metric_system From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to the metric system: Metric system – various loosely related systems of measurement that trace their origin to the decimal system of measurement introduced in France during the French Revolution. 1 Nature of the metric system 2 Metric units of measure 3 History of the metric system 4 Politics of the metric system 5 Future of the metric system 6 Metric system organizations 7 Metric system publications 8 Persons influential in the metric system 9 See also "The metric system is for all people for all 10 References time." (Condorcet 1791) Four objects used in 11 External links making measurements in everyday situations that have metric calibrations are shown: a tape measure calibrated in centimetres, a thermometer calibrated in degrees Celsius, a kilogram mass, and an electrical multimeter The metric system can be described as all of the following: which measures volts, amps and ohms. System – set of interacting or interdependent components forming an integrated whole. System of measurement – set of units which can be used to specify anything which can be measured. Historically, systems of measurement were initially defined and regulated to support trade and internal commerce. Units were arbitrarily defined by fiat (see statutory law) by the ruling entities and were not necessarily well inter-related or self-consistent. When later analyzed and scientifically, some quantities were designated as fundamental units, meaning all other needed units of measure could be derived from them.
    [Show full text]
  • Outlines of the Evolution of Weights and Measures and the Metric System
    OUTLINES OF THE EVOLUTION OF WEIGHTS AND MEASUEES AND THE METRIC SYSTEM OUTLINES OF THE EVOLUTION OF WEIGHTS AND MEASURES AND THE METRIC SYSTEM BY WILLIAM HALLOCK Ph.D. PROFESSOR OF PHYSIOS IN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND HERBERT T. WADE EDITOR FOR PHYSICS AND APPLIED SCIENCE, ' THK NEW INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPAEDIA THE MACMILLAN COMPANY LONDON : MACMILLAN AND CO. LTD. 1906 ac 2b SEP 8 <i ;\ OFT 9239G3 GLASGOW I PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY BY ROBERT MACLEHOSE AND CO. LTD. PREFACE. In the following pages it has been the aim of the authors to present in simple and non-technical language, so far as possible, a comprehensive view of the evolution of the science of metrology as it is now understood. Inasmuch as the introduction of the Metric System into the United States and Great Britain is a topic of more or less general interest at the present time, it has seemed that a work designed both for the student of science and for the general reader, in which this system is discussed in its relation to other systems of weights and measures past and present, would fill a certain need. While there are many works on metrology that treat at considerable length the historic and scientific sides of the subject, as well as the economic and archaeological questions involved, and a large number of books and pamphlets dealing with the teaching of the Metric System, besides those supplying tables and formulas for converting from one system to the other, yet there is apparently a distinct lack of works, which in small compass discuss the subject comprehensively from its many points of view.
    [Show full text]