DOCSLIB.ORG

The French Revolution a Volume in the DOCUMENTARY HISTORY of WESTERN CIVILIZATION - the French Revolution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The French Revolution a Volume in the DOCUMENTARY HISTORY of WESTERN CIVILIZATION - the French Revolution The French Revolution A volume In THE DOCUMENTARY HISTORY of WESTERN CIVILIZATION - The French Revolution Edited by PAUL H. BEIK PALGRA VE MACMILLAN ISBN 978-1-349-00528-4 ISBN 978-1-349-00526-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-00526-0 THE FRENCH REVOLUTION English translation copyright © 1970 by Paul H. Beik Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1970 978-0-333-07911-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. First published in the United States 1970 First published in the United Kingdom by The Macmillan Press Ltd. 1971 Published by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Associated companies in New York Toronto Dublin Melbourne Johannesburg and Madras SBN 333 07911 6 Contents Introduction x PART I. CROWN, PARLEMENT, AND ARISTOCRACY 1. November 19, 1787: Chretien Fran~ois de Lamoignon on Principles of the French Monarchy 1 2. April 17, 1788: Louis XVI to a Deputation from the Parlement of Paris 3 3. May 4, 1788: Repeated Remonstrances of the Parlement of Paris in Response to the King's Statement of April 17 5 4. December 12,1788: Memoir of the Princes 10 PART II. THE SURGE OF OPINION 5. January, 1789: Sieyes, What Is the Third Estate? 16 6. February, 1789: Mounier on the Estates General 37 7. March 1, 1789: Parish Cahiers of Ecommoy and Mansigne 45 8. March 14, 1789: Cahier of the Nobility of Crepy 51 9. March 26,1789: Cahier of the Clergy of Troyes 56 PART III. THE Loss OF ROYAL INITIATIVE 10. June 16, 1789: Barentin's Memorandum on the Crisis in the Estates General 64 11. June 22, 1789: Montmorin's Testimony in Support of Necker 69 12 . June 23, 1789: Louis XVI at the Royal Session of the Estates General 72 13. August 2, 1789: Rivarol on the Meaning of July 14 80 PART IV. THE DEFEAT OF A MODERATE CoALITION 14. August 4, 1789: Night Session of the National Assembly 86 15. August 20-26,1789: Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen 94 Vlll CONTENTS 16. September 1,1789: Mirabeau on Royal Authority 97 17. September 4, 1789: Abbe Gregoire on the Royal Veto and the Legislature of Two Chambers 107 PART V. THE POWER OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY 18. October 10, 1789: Talleyrand on Ecclesiastical Property 113 19. October 15, 1789: Mirabeau, a Secret Memoir 120 20. January 28, 1790: A Petition to the National Assembly from Leaders of Jewish Communities ] 30 21. May 29, 30, 1790: Debate on the Civil Constitution of the Clergy "I 36 PART VI. THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY BETWEEN CoUNTERREVOLUTION AND DEMOCRACY 22. April, 1791: Robespierre on the Suffrage 143 23. June 14, 1791: Chapelier on Organizations of Workers 15 5 24. June 20, 1791: Louis XVI on the Subject of His Flight 158 25. August 11,1791: Barnave on Representative Govern- ment and the Social Order 168 26. September 8, 1791: Marie Antoinette on Ending the Revol ution 176 PART VII. WAR AND REVOLUTION 27. January 11, 1792: Robespierre on War 186 28. January 20, 1792: Brissot on War 196 29. April 27, 1792: Malouet, a Conservative View of the Revolution 207 30. July 7,1792: Marat, a Radical View of the Revolution 215 PART VIII. THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONVENTION 31. November 19, 1792: Petitioners vs. Roland on Price- Fixing 222 32. December 12, 1792: An Attack on the Slave Trade 228 33. February 15, 1793: Condorcet Presents His Constitution to the Convention 236 34. March 10, 1793: Danton on Crisis Measures 250 35. May 10, 1793: Robespierre on Constitutional Principles 255 CONTENTS ix PART IX. THE CONVENTION AND THE SANS-CULOTTES 36. June 25, 1793: Roux Before the Convention 260 37. September 2, 1793: Section des Sans-Culottes, Social Views 263 38. November 7,10,1793: Dechristianizing 266 39. November, 1793: Pere Duchesne, His Plebeian Appeal 271 40. February 5, 1794 (17 Pluviase, An II): Robespierre's Report on the Principles of Political Morality 276 41. February 26, March 3, 1794: Saint-Just on the Ventase Decrees 288 42. May 7, 1794 (18 Floreal, An II): Robespierre's Report on Religious and Moral Ideas and Republican Princi- ples 299 PART X. THE SEARCH FOR STABILITY AFTER THERMIDOR 43. June 23, 1795: Boissy d'Anglas on a New Constitution 313 44. July, 1795: Louis XVIII, Declaration of Verona 324 45. November 30, 1795: Babeuf's Le Tribun du peuple, No. 35 329 46. December 6, 1795: Mallet du Pan After Vendemiaire 339 47. 1794, 1795, 1796: Joseph de Maistre on Reason, Monarchy, and Aristocracy 343 48. September, 1796: TheoanthropophiIe Manual 352 49. September 19, 1797: Bonaparte to Talleyrand About Sieyes 358 50. February or March, 1799: Mme. de Stael on Constitu- tionalism and Dictatorship 361 The Republican and Gregorian Calendars 372 Chronology 374 Selected References 386 Index 391 Int roduction THE FRENCH REVOLUTION lives in the consciousness of world opinion as a reference point for change. It retains a remarkable contemporaneity, product of the passage from a traditionalistic, aristocratic society toward one whose contours are the focus of today's contestations. What began to be visible in the wreckage of the old regime at the end of the eighteenth century was not yet today's world; one may not ask of one era that it be another. Many of the projections of the revolution did not come to pass­ for example, the vision of a society of small independent producers­ and although our political and social vocabulary owes much to the revolutionary era its terms have been buffeted since then by many contexts. Yet the evolution, even distortion, of terms was to do honor to the importance of the issues raised but not solved at the end of the eighteenth century, and some of the revolution's principles-for example, the sovereignty of the people and national self-determination-have gone from triumph to triumph. What the revolution possessed, owing to the breakdown of authority and the struggle for the succession on the part of contending groups and programs, was intensity, seriousness, and variety. The revolution never spoke with one voice except in the claims of its competing children and their descendants. It was a collective experience, un­ planned, a clashing of wills and purposes. It remains a point of reference because of this, because the attackers and defenders brought out problems of political organization and social justice and, when these needed backing, propositions about the nature and prospects of man. Such a revolution could not fail to be an international event, a "challenge" to the institutions and conceptions of Europe and, to a lesser degree, of America, and a "struggle" over their future­ to use the metaphors of Robert R. Palmer. The French were not alone in making this challenge, nor were they the first to do so, INTRODUCTION xi and they never claimed that the principles at stake in the struggle applied only to France. Where the French Revolution was unique was in its combinations of men and circumstances, its timing, its stages, and its methods. And since France was by many indexes the most powerful, advanced, and influential country in Europe, the French experience in all its intensity became the model that overshadowed the others and gave its name to the era. The earliest decision in the making of this book of documents about the revolution was to concentrate on this French experience rather than on the international, in order to make room for the fullest possible expression of what the French thought was happen­ ing to them or ought to happen. These events and prospects were long considered, and for some are still thought to have been, primarily political. Certainly the revolution was a political effort of great staying power, brought on by the failure of those in charge of the absolute monarchy to make reforms without losing the initiative and authority essential to government; it became a political effort to replace absolutism by some form of representative institu­ tions, an effort that lasted for ten years before its temporary diversion into other channels by Napoleon. This central theme encompassed many technical problems of a growing political sci­ ence; but what is most interesting in the experience is its core, the linking of government to society, which in the given circumstances produced some half-dozen possibilities. The least drastic change would have been a representative system guaranteeing the old social system as long as its defenders, preponderant in the Estates General, wished to preserve it. The next possibility, recommended by men such as Jean Joseph Mounier and his fellow Anglophiles, featured strong royal authority and a legislature of two chambers in an effort to conciliate the aristocracy and contain the lower classes; the Anglophiles, while hoping for the support of all prop­ ertied and educated people, including nobles and clergy, in reality deprived the aristocracy of the guarantees that most of them wanted. Other positions followed, both logically and as the prod­ ucts of events. There were Constitutionalists, followers of La­ fayette or of Antoine Barnave and his friends, two wings that came together as Feuillants in later, adverse times in a futile effort to check the democratic avalanche before its weight became ON"er­ whelming. The Constitutionalists at first opposed some of the Anglophile brakes on popular enthusiasm, although they agreed with the Anglophiles in wanting to liInit the suffrage and in regard- xii INTRODUCTION ing representation as a political function best reserved for persons of tested capacity, the most obvious test being possession of prop­ erty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contraception and the Renaissance of Traditional Marriage
    CHOOSING A LAW TO LIVE BY ONCE THE KING IS GONE INTRODUCTION Law is the expression of the rules by which civilization governs itself, and it must be that in law as elsewhere will be found the fundamental differences of peoples. Here then it may be that we find the underlying cause of the difference between the civil law and the common law.1 By virtue of its origin, the American legal profession has always been influenced by sources of law outside the United States. American law schools teach students the common law, and law students come to understand that the common law is different than the civil law, which is prevalent in Europe.2 Comparative law courses expose law students to the civil law system by comparing American common law with the law of other countries such as France, which has a civil code.3 A closer look at the history of the American and French Revolutions makes one wonder why the legal systems of the two countries are so different. Certainly, the American and French Revolutions were drastically different in some ways. For instance, the French Revolution was notoriously violent during a period known as “the Terror.”4 Accounts of the French revolutionary government executing so many French citizens as well as the creation of the Cult of the Supreme Being5 make the French Revolution a stark contrast to the American Revolution. Despite the differences, the revolutionary French and Americans shared similar goals—liberty and equality for all citizens and an end to tyranny. Both revolutions happened within approximately two decades of each other and were heavily influenced by the Enlightenment.
    [Show full text]
  • One and Indivisible? Federation, Federalism, and Colonialism in the Early French and Haitian Revolutions
    One and Indivisible? Federation, Federalism, and Colonialism in the Early French and Haitian Revolutions MANUEL COVO abstract Histories of the French Revolution usually locate the origins of the “one and indivisible Republic” in a strictly metropolitan context. In contrast, this article argues that the French Revolution’s debates surrounding federation, federalism, and the (re)foundation of the French nation-state were interwoven with colonial and transimperial matters. Between 1776 and 1792 federalism in a French imperial context went from an element of an academic conversation among bureaucrats and economists to a matter of violent struggle in Saint- Domingue that generated new agendas in the metropole. Going beyond the binary language of union and secession, the article examines the contest over federation and federalism in Saint-Domingue between free people of color and white planters who, taking inspiration from both metropolitan and non-French experiences with federalism, sought to alter the col- ony’s relationship with the metropole while also maintaining the institution of slavery. Revo- lutionaries on both sides of the Atlantic, unsure which direction to take and without the ben- efit of hindsight, used the language of federalism to pursue rival interests despite a seemingly common vocabulary. This entangled history of conflicts, compromises, and misunderstand- ings blurred ideological delineations but decisively shaped the genesis of the French imperial republic. keywords French Revolution, Haitian Revolution, federalism, French
    [Show full text]
  • France: the Revolt of Democratic Christianity and the Rise of Public Opinion
    The Enlightenment and religion 4 France: the revolt of democratic Christianity and the rise of public opinion This chapter focuses on the emergence of religious toleration in France and the degree to which it was brought about by broad po- litico-religious struggle rather than by the philosophes.1 The discus- sion will, therefore, not provide the usual Enlightenment studies degree of focus upon the philosophes. Much of the research neces- sary for a revision of the role of the philosophes in France has been accumulating for several decades, but there has not yet been an at- tempt to bring together the various strands and integrate them into a critique of their role. Albeit slowly, from the mid 1960s a revision of the status of Pierre Bayle as a Calvinist fideist (discussed in earlier chapters) rather than an early philosophe has gradually gained ac- ceptance.2 Again rather slowly and mostly from the 1980s, there have been efforts to demonstrate that Christianity occupied a more important place in the development of the French Enlightenment than had hitherto been accepted.3 In particular there has been in- creased recognition of the role of Jansenism, especially in the land- mark suppression of the Jesuits.4 Much of the tale I recount in this chapter is, therefore, already well-known and I am indebted to the research of a number of scholars (some of whom have already been cited in earlier chapters) including R. Barny, C. J. Betts, P. R. Campbell, A. Kors, P. J. Korshin, Elizabeth Labrousse, M. Linton, J. McManners, W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federalist Revolt: an Affirmation Or Denial Ofopular P Sovereignty?
    Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS College of Liberal Arts & Sciences 9-1992 The Federalist Revolt: An Affirmation or Denial ofopular P Sovereignty? Paul R, Hanson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers Part of the European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Recommended Citation Hanson, Paul, R."The Federalist Revolt: An Affirmation or Denial of Popular Sovereignty?" French History, vol. 6, no. 3 (September, 1992), 335-355. Available from: digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/500/ This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Monarchist Clubs and the Pamphlet Debate over Political Legitimacy in the Early Years of the French Revolution Paul R. Hanson Paul R. Hanson is professor and chair of history at Butler University. He is currently working on a book- length study of the Federalist revolt of 1793. Research for this article was supported by a summer grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities and by assistance from Butler University. Earlier versions were presented at annual meetings of the Society for French Historical Studies. The author would like to thank Gary Kates, Ken Margerison, Colin Jones, Jeremy Popkin, Michael Kennedy, Jack Censer, Jeffrey Ravel, John Burney, and the anonymous readers for the journal for their helpful comments on various drafts of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty
    Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty Author: Rebecca Clark Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:103616 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2012 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Department of Political Science MONTESQUIEU ON THE HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY OF POLITICAL LIBERTY A dissertation by REBECCA RUDMAN CLARK submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 © Copyright by REBECCA RUDMAN CLARK 2012 Abstract Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty Rebecca R. Clark Dissertation Advisor: Christopher Kelly Montesquieu famously presents climate and terrain as enabling servitude in hot, fertile climes and on the exposed steppes of central Asia. He also traces England’s exemplary constitution, with its balanced constitution, independent judiciary, and gentle criminal practices, to the unique conditions of early medieval northern Europe. The English “found” their government “in the forests” of Germany. There, the marginal, variegated terrain favored the dispersion of political power, and a pastoral way of life until well into the Middle Ages. In pursuing a primitive honor unrelated to political liberty as such, the barbaric Franks accidentally established the rudiments of the most “well-tempered” government. His turn to these causes accidental to human purposes in Parts 3-6 begins with his analysis of the problem of unintended consequences in the history of political reform in Parts 1-2. While the idea of balancing political powers in order to prevent any one individual or group from dominating the rest has ancient roots, he shows that it has taken many centuries to understand just what needs to be balanced, and to learn to balance against one threat without inviting another.
    [Show full text]
  • Cas Pratique
    Cas pratique Cours : Droit constitutionnel 1 : Théorie générale de l’Etat - Histoire constitutionnelle de la France Enoncé : Il s'agit d’étudier l'ensemble de la période 1788-1815, et de dégager les grands principes constitutionnels alors en vigueur ou en devenir. Question 1 : L’Ancien Régime Réponse 1 : Sous l'Ancien Régime, parce qu'elle est de droit divin, la monarchie est absolue. Réponse fausse Commentaire : En fait, le caractère absolutiste et le fondement religieux de la monarchie française d'avant 1789 sont deux notions distinctes et indépendantes l'une de l'autre. Toutefois dans les faits, le fondement de droit divin favorise l'absolutisme. En effet, la monarchie française est dite absolue parce que le monarque concentre tous les pouvoirs (législation, justice, etc.) dans ses mains, et ses pouvoirs se connaissent pas de limites. Au contraire, à la même époque, la monarchie anglaise a déjà fait sa mutation et est déjà une monarchie limitée, une monarchie constitutionnelle. Par ailleurs, la monarchie française est alors de droit divin, c'est à dire que le monarque détient son pouvoir de dieu. L'origine divine du pouvoir royal est symbolisée par le sacre du roi à Reims. Cela signifie également qu'il n'est responsable, dirait-on aujourd'hui, que devant dieu. La Révolution française mit fin à ces deux caractéristiques. Réponse 2 : Les lois fondamentales du Royaume désignent la constitution s'appliquant sous l'Ancien Régime. Réponse juste Commentaire : Sous l'Ancien Régime, il n'existe pas de constitution écrite (comme l'inventa ensuite la Révolution française) mais des règles coutumières, par ailleurs incomplètes.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Regency, 1643–1661
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-57177-8 — A/AS Level History for AQA The Sun King: Louis XIV, France and Europe, 1643–1715 Student Book David Hickman , Edited by Michael Fordham , David Smith Excerpt More Information PART 1: THE SUN KING 1643–1685 1 The Regency, 1643–1661 In this section, we shall look at the beginning of Louis XIV’s reign and the situation in France when he came to the throne aged four. We shall look at how the government was established that ruled in France until Louis took personal control of afairs in 1661. The Regency years were marked by armed conflict, so we shall also examine the wars and civil wars of this period in French history. We will look into: • the French monarchy in 1643: the legacy of Richelieu and Louis XIII; the establishment of the Regency • the minority of Louis XIV: the roles of Anne of Austria and Mazarin; the Parlement of Paris, unrest and opposition; the Frondes • France and Europe: the rise of French power at the expense of the Habsburgs; the treaties of Westphalia and the Pyrenees • the condition of France at the accession of Louis XIV in 1661: politics, economy and society. The French monarchy in 1643 The legacy of Richelieu and Louis XIII Louis XIII was king of France 1610–1643 and married Anne of Austria. Ater 23 years of hoping for an heir and four still births, the couple produced Louis in 1638, prompting calls of a miracle birth. 1 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-57177-8 — A/AS Level History for AQA The Sun King: Louis XIV, France and Europe, 1643–1715 Student Book David Hickman , Edited by Michael Fordham , David Smith Excerpt More Information A/AS Level History for AQA: The Sun King: Louis XIV, France and Europe, 1643–1715 Voices from the past Richelieu Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu was French Chief Minister 1624–1642.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu's Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation Laurence Claus University of San Diego School of Law, [email protected]
    University of San Diego Digital USD University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Law Faculty Scholarship Theory Research Paper Series September 2004 Montesquieu's Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation Laurence Claus University of San Diego School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digital.sandiego.edu/lwps_public Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Public Law and Legal Theory Commons Digital USD Citation Claus, Laurence, "Montesquieu's Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation" (2004). University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series. 11. http://digital.sandiego.edu/lwps_public/art11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Faculty Scholarship at Digital USD. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series by an authorized administrator of Digital USD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claus: Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series September 2004 Montesquieu's Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation Laurence Claus Published by Digital USD, 2004 1 University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Art. 11 [2004] MONTESQUIEU’S MISTAKES AND THE TRUE MEANING OF SEPARATION 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (forthcoming) Laurence Claus1 “The political liberty of the subject,” said Montesquieu, “is a tranquility of mind arising from the opinion each person has of his safety. In order to have this liberty, it is requisite the government be so constituted as one man needs not be afraid of another.”2 The liberty of which Montesquieu spoke is directly promoted by apportioning power among political actors in a way that minimizes opportunities for those actors to determine conclusively the reach of their own powers.
    [Show full text]
  • La Revolució Francesa I La Seva Ambivalent Herència Política*
    DOSSIER MONOGRÀFIC LA REBEL·LIA La Revolució Francesa i la seva ambivalent herència política* Edgar Straehle** Universitat de Barcelona [email protected] Resum: Hi ha esdeveniments del passat que tenen una gran productivitat cap al futur. En aquest article s’examina de quina manera un episodi com la Revolució Francesa ha estat capaç de generar una ambivalent tradició política i de pensament que travessa els darrers dos segles i arriba fins al present. D’altra banda, es recuperen els debats intel·lectuals que s’interrogaven sobre quina havia de ser la relació del present amb el passat en els mo- ments revolucionaris. Finalment, es mostra que moltes de les invocacions al llegat de la Revolució Francesa podien combinar-se amb un intent de superació de les seves contra- diccions o limitacions. Paraules clau: Revolució Francesa, memòria, tradició revolucionària, Karl Marx, Walter Benjamin. Abstract: There are events from the past that have inspired great future productivity. This article examines how an episode such as the French Revolution could generate an ambivalent tradition of politicas and thought spanning the past two centuries up till the present day. Then, it tackles the intellectual debates that questioned what the relationship of the present to the past should be in revolutionary times. Finally, it shows how many of the invocations to the legacy of the French Revolution could be combined in an attempt to overcome its contradictions or limitations. Keywords: French Revolution, memory, revolutionary tradition, Karl Marx, Walter Benjamin. * La investigació d’aquest text s’ha realitzat en el marc del projecte Vulnerabilidad en el pensamiento filosófi- co femenino.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Space of Politics in Revolutionary France
    UC Berkeley New Faculty Lecture Series (formerly Morrison Library Inaugural Address) Title Creative Negations: Defining the Space of Politics in Revolutionary France Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3bp0x2h6 Author Bates, David Publication Date 2000 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California M o r *r i s o. n L i -b -r a r y In a u g u r a . A d "d r e s s S e r i e s m. .': De.fini the 0 Fr Creativ'e Negati'ons: * Deinig teSpace ofPolitics in Revolutionary Frnce University of California, Berkele~y 2000, Morrison Library Inaugural Address Series No.20 Editorial Board Jan Carter, issue editor Carlos R. Delgado, series editor Morrison Library: Alex Warren Text format and design: Mary Scott . C) 2000 UC Regents ISSN: 1079-2732 Published by: The Doe Library. University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-6000 We wish to thank the Rhetoric Department for supporting the lecture and the publication of this issue. PREFACE The goal of this series is to foster schol- arship on campus by providing new faculty members with the opportunity to share their research interest with their colleagues and students. We see the role of an academic li- brary not only as a place where bibliographic materials are acquired, stored, and made ac- cessible to the intellectual community, but also as an institution that is an active partici- pant in the generation of knowledge. New faculty members represent areas of scholarship the University wishes to develop or further strengthen. They are also among the best minds in their respective fields of specialization.
    [Show full text]
  • Merriman-Louis XIV Part 1
    Louis XIV by John Merriman As will quickly become obvious, I wrote the footnotes. In Louis XIV’s France, architects and artists were paid to glorify the monarch. In 1662, the king chose the sun as his emblem; he declared himself nec pluribus impar—without equal. To Louis, the sun embodied virtues that he associated with the ideal monarch: firmness, benevolence, and equity. Henceforth, Louis XIV would frequently be depicted as Apollo, the Greek and Roman sun god. The rulers of continental Europe, including Louis XIV, relentlessly extended their power between 1650 and 1750. The sovereigns of France, Prussia, Russia, Austria, and Sweden, in particular, became absolute rulers, in principle above all challenge from within the state itself…. They made their personal rule absolute, based on loyalty to them as individuals, not to the state as an abstraction. Absolute rulers asserted their supreme right to proclaim laws and levy taxes, appointing more officials to carry out the details of governance and multiplying fiscal demands on their subjects. They ended most of the long-standing municipal privileges… such as freedom from taxation, or the right to maintain independent courts.1 The absolute state affected the lives of more people than ever before through taxation, military service, and the royal quest for religious orthodoxy. Absolute rule thus impinged directly on the lives of subjects, who felt the extended reach of state power through, for example, more efficient tax collection…. Absolutism was, at least in part, an attempt to reassert public order and coercive state authority after almost seventy years of wars that had badly disrupted trade and agricultural production, contributing to social and political chaos.2 THEORIES OF ABSOLUTISM The doctrine of absolutism originated with French jurists at the end of the sixteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Code Napoleon, Marked the Beginning of a New Era in Practical Jurisprudence
    TUE AMERICAN LAW REGISTER FOUNDED 1852. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA DBPARTMENT OF LAW VOL. 40 NS. MARCH, 19o. No. 3. THE CODE NAPOLE ON. "Lepouvoir ligislatif est la to'it-t5Lissancehur-aize. La loi ltablit, gonserve, change, modifie, fierfectionne: elle detruil ce qui est; elle crae ce qui n'estfpas encore." Portalis. -" Expfos du firojet du Code."-An XI. Offspring of necessity and opportunity, conceived at the moment of a political and social debacle, quickened amid horror and fury, and born in the exaggerated light of a new imperialism, this truly remarkable body of laws, known generally as the Code Napoleon, marked the beginning of a new era in practical jurisprudence. The work was framed to embrace the civil relations of citizens of a public and private nature. It was promulgated under Bonaparte as First Consul, March 21, 18o4, as Le Code civil des Frangais. The imperial government having taken the place of the republic, the Legislative Corps on August 24, 1807, adopted a new edition of the same work under the title of Code Napolgon. This was pursuant to the wishes of the Emperor, whose limitless ambition craved per- manent identification with this legal creation, which he regarded as one of the greatest glories of all his supremacy. The restoration, while retaining the laws, officially 127 THE CODE NAPOLEON. restored the original title, but popularly the name of the great conqueror has ever remained attached to the civil code of France. Closely following the adoption of this initial work other codifications took permanent form, and under the empire the whole series was adopted under the title of Les Cinque Codes, consisting of the civil code, called, as before men- tioned, Le Code Napolgon, Le Code de proc6dure civile, Le Code de Commerce, Le Code d'instruction criminelle and Le Code p~nal.
    [Show full text]