DOCSLIB.ORG

Fauna of New Zealand, Website Copy 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Larochelle, A.; Larivière, M.-C. 2001: Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue. Fauna of New Zealand 43, 285 pp. INVERTEBRATE SYSTEMATICS ADVISORY GROUP REPRESENTATIVES OF LANDCARE RESEARCH Dr D.R. Penman Landcare Research Lincoln Agriculture & Science Centre P.O. Box 69, Lincoln, New Zealand Dr T.K. Crosby and Dr M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF UNIVERSITIES Dr R.M. Emberson Ecology and Entomology Group Soil, Plant, and Ecological Sciences Division P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF MUSEUMS Mr R.L. Palma Natural Environment Department Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand REPRESENTATIVE OF OVERSEAS INSTITUTIONS Dr J.F. Lawrence CSIRO Division of Entomology G.P.O. Box 1700, Canberra City A.C.T. 2601, Australia * * * SERIES EDITOR Dr T. K. Crosby Landcare Research Mount Albert Research Centre Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 43 Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] [email protected] Manaaki W h e n u a P R E S S Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand 2001 4 Larochelle & Larivière (2001): Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) catalogue Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2001 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher. Cataloguing in publication LAROCHELLE, André, 1940– Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera): catalogue / A. Larochelle and M.-C. Larivière – Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. : Manaaki Whenua Press, 2001. (Fauna of New Zealand, ISSN 0111–5383 ; no. 43). ISBN 0-478-09342-X I. Larivière, Marie-Claude II. Title III. Series UDC 595.762.12(931) Prepared for publication by the series editor and authors using computer-based text processing, layout, scanning, and printing at Landcare Research, Mt Albert Research Centre, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand. Frontispiece digital image prepared by Dr B. E. Rhode using a 3-CCD colour video camera, the software Auto-Montage® to increase depth-of-field, and the photoprocessing software PhotoShop®. M~ori text by H. Jacob, Huatau Consultants, Levin. Published by Manaaki Whenua Press, Landcare Research, P.O. Box 40, Lincoln, Canterbury, N.Z. Website: http://www.mwpress.co.nz/ Printed by PrintLink Ltd, Wellington Front cover: Maoripamborus fairburni Brookes, 1944 (Illustrator: D. W. Helmore). Publication of the Fauna of New Zealand series is the result of a research investment by the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology under contract number C09X0002. Fauna of New Zealand 43 5 POPULAR SUMMARY HE WHAKARAPOPOTOTANGA Class Insecta Order Coleoptera Family Carabidae Illustration / Whakaahua: Cicindela tuberculata Fabricius, Ground beetles 1775 (Illustrator / Kaiwhakaahua: D. W. Helmore). The family Carabidae (ground beetles, including tiger beetles) is composed of 25 000 to 50 000 species world- Ng~ p§tara noho papa wide, but probably at least twice as many taxa remain to be described. The world fauna is divided into 6 subfamilies I roto i te wh~nau Carabidae (ng~ p§tara noho papa, tae and 85 tribes. Compared with larger or warmer regions atu ki ng~ p~papa) kei waenga i te 25,000 me te 100,000 of the world, the New Zealand fauna may appear rela- ng~ momo e mÇhiotia ana huri i te ao, otir~, ka whakareatia tively small (5 subfamilies, 20 tribes, 78 genera, 424 spe- t‘nei ki te rua, koir~ k‘ pea te nui o ng~ momo k~ore anÇ cies), but New Zealand, with Australia, is a special place i tautuhia noa. Ko ng~ Carabidae katoa o te ao, ka noho ki where the tribes Amarotypini, Broscini, Mecyclothoracini, ‘tahi wh~nau iti e 6, me ‘tahi iwi e 85. Ina whakatairitea Meonini, Migadopini, Pamborini, Tropopterini, and Zolini ki ng~ takiw~ mahana ake o te ao, t‘r~ ka whakaarohia he appear to have achieved their greatest taxonomic diver- wh~iti tonu te hunga noho ki Aotearoa (e 5 ng~ momo iti, sity. Once described, the New Zealand fauna will likely e 20 ng~ iwi, e 78 ng~ puninga, e 424 ng~ momo). Engari reach 600 species. Endemism is high with 92% (391) of he k~inga ahurei tonu a Aotearoa me Ahitereiria, ~, kua species and 58% (46) of genera currently recognised as kaha tonu te tupu me te rea o ng~ iwi Amarotypini, occurring only in this country. Faunal affinities are great- Broscini, Mecyclothoracini, Meonini, Migadopini, est with eastern Australia (16 native genera and 4 native Pamborini, Tropopterini, me Zolini ki konei. Ina oti katoa species are shared). te tautuhi, ka eke pea ki te 600 ng~ momo o Aotearoa. Ko ‘ ~ ‘ ~ While it is easy to recognise a carabid as such, it is t tahi 92% (e 391) o ng momo, ko t tahi 58% o ng ~ ‘ rather difficult to identify it at the species level. Ground puninga (e 46) k ore e kitea i whenua k . Heoi, he ~ ~ beetles show a relatively high degree of morphological torokaha tonu te hono ki te r whiti o Ahitereiria (16 ng ~ ~ uniformity, a marked diversity of taxa, and striking eco- puninga, e 4 ng momo, ka kitea i ng whenua e rua). logical preferences, which make them especially suitable Ahakoa ka mÇhio noa koe ki te carabid, ka uaua ake for studying the ecological and physical adaptations re- te tautuhi i ia momo. He kaha tonu te Çrite o tÇ r~tou quired to cope with environmental demands. Carabids are hanga, engari in~ te tini o ng~ momo, ~, mÇ te w~hi ki Ç generally abundant and demonstrate a flexible set of re- r~tou k~inga noho, he rerek‘ t~ t‘n~, t~ t‘n~ i pai ai. N~ sponses to environmental factors. Because of these fea- konei i pai ai ‘nei mea mÇ te rangahau i ng~ urutaunga tures, the relative ease with which their populations may taha k~inga, taha tinana e hiahiatia ana e tau ai te noho. be sampled by reliable quantitative methods (e.g., Ka m~totoru tonu te noho a ng~ carabid ki te mata o te pittrapping), and their potential use as bioindicators and whenua, ~, ka t~wariwari tonu t~ r~tou aro atu ki ng~ biocontrol agents, these beetles increasingly attract the ~huatanga t‘r~ ka p~. N~ ‘nei ~huatanga, n~ te m~m~ attention of world scientists. Biologists investigating evo- hoki o te t§pako i a r~tou hei ine i te tokomaha (hei tauira, lutionary and ecological hypotheses particularly favour ki te kÇpiha) me tÇ r~tou pai hei waitohu koiora, hei this group. In New Zealand, conservation biologists have kaipatu koiora hoki, kei te tahuri mai te ao pãtaiao wh~nui already listed many, often large-sized carabid species, as tonu ki a r~tou. Kei te aro nuitia hoki e ng~ tohunga koiora rare or threatened and worthy of protection. e whakam~tau ana i ng~ whakapae e p~ ana ki te kunenga (continued overleaf) (haere tonu) 6 Larochelle & Larivière (2001): Carabidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) catalogue As a result, ground beetles are among the best repre- me te taupuhi kaiao. I Aotearoa, ar~ ‘tahi momo carabid sented insect groups in New Zealand entomological mu- maha tonu (tae atu ki ‘tahi mea rahi), e k§ ana ng~ tohunga seums and collections. But despite such high interest, no whakapãmau koiora kua onge, kua mÇrearea r~nei te noho, catalogue or checklist has been produced since 1934, al- ~, me tiaki ka tika. though numerous name changes and new species have N~ konei anÇ i nohoia nuitia ai ng~ whare rokiroki been published since then. pepeke me ng~ kohinga pepeke o Aoteroa e ng~ p§tara In general, carabids are hygrophilous (moisture-lov- noho papa, ina whakaritea ki ‘r~ atu o ng~ aitanga pepeke. ing) species living at ground surface, but a number of Engari ahakoa e wh~ia nuitia ana t‘nei wh~nau, nÇ te tau species also live deep in the soil, in caves, or on plants 1934 te whakararangitanga whakamutunga o Çna hu~nga and trees, and several species occur in association with katoa (otir~, kua t~ia he kÇrero e whakaatu ana i ng~ ingoa the loose bark of trees or in rotten branches. The two hou, me ng~ momo hou i roto i te w~). New Zealand native habitats that harbour the greatest Noho ai te nuinga o ng~ carabid ki te mata tonu o number of species are forests and tussock grasslands. Papatuanuku, ~, he pai ki a r~tou te m~kã. Heoi anÇ, ar~ While some species live almost exclusively along coastal ‘tahi ka noho rawa ki tÇna poho, ki ng~ ana, ki runga lowlands, the majority of New Zealand species are found r~nei i ng~ tipu me ng~ r~kau. Ar~ anÇ ‘tahi ka noho tahi from the lowlands to higher elevations below the subalpine ki te hiako tangatanga, ki ng~ peka pirau r~nei. Ko ng~ zone. Very few described carabids appear to be restricted k~inga noho m~ori e rua o Aotearoa e kitea ai te tokomaha to subalpine or alpine environments, but many new spe- o ng~ momo carabid, ko te ngahere me ng~ whenua p~t§t§. cies remain to be described from such habitats. Most Ko ‘tahi momo ka noho ki ng~ whenua p~t§t§ o te indigenous carabids occur naturally within the confines tahamoana anake, engari ko te nuinga, ka kitea mai i te of native habitats, although a number of them can survive tahatika, piki atu ki ng~ whenua ~hua teitei tonu.
Recommended publications
  • Anisodactylus Binotatus Fabr., a Carabid Beetle New to New Zealand, and a Review of the Exotic Carabid Fauna

    Anisodactylus Binotatus Fabr., a Carabid Beetle New to New Zealand, and a Review of the Exotic Carabid Fauna

    Pacific Insects 5 (4) : 837-847 December 30, 1963 ANISODACTYLUS BINOTATUS FABR., A CARABID BEETLE NEW TO NEW ZEALAND, AND A REVIEW OF THE EXOTIC CARABID FAUNA By R. L. C. Pilgrim DEPT, OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY, NEW ZEALAND Abstract: Anisodactylus binotatus Fabr. 1787 (Col.: Carabidae), an introduced species now established in Canterbury (South Island), New Zealand, is reported for the first time. The literature respecting other carabids sometimes recorded as introduced is reviewed; Ago- nochila binotata (White, 1846), Agonum submetallicum (White, 1846), Hypharpax australasiae (Dejean, 1829) and Pentagonica vittipennis Chaudoir, 1877 are shown to be better considered as endemic to the Australia - New Zealand area. Other species are classed as either native to New Zealand, clearly introduced though not all established, or of doubtful occurrence in New Zealand. Introduction: The Carabidae of New Zealand are predominantly endemic species, but a small number of exotic species has been recorded. This paper reports a further introduc­ tion to the carabid fauna of this country and concludes with a survey of recorded exotic Carabidae in New Zealand. Specimens of the newly-recorded species were collected in domestic gardens in Christ­ church, and were included in a collection sent for identification to Dr. E. B. Britton, British Museum (Nat. Hist.), who kindly drew the writer's attention to the fact that they were so far unreported from New Zealand. Description of adult (from New Zealand specimens) Fig. 1. Anisodactylus binotatus Fabricius, 1787 Color: Head, pronotum, elytra and femora black; tibiae and tarsi light brown to red- black ; palps and antennal segments 1-2 brown, remainder of antennae black; leg spines red-brown; head with small red spot on frons between eyes.

  • Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 573: 387–512 (2016)Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada 387 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada Reginald P. Webster1 1 24 Mill Stream Drive, Charters Settlement, NB, Canada E3C 1X1 Corresponding author: Reginald P. Webster ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Bouchard | Received 3 February 2016 | Accepted 29 February 2016 | Published 24 March 2016 http://zoobank.org/34473062-17C2-4122-8109-3F4D47BB5699 Citation: Webster RP (2016) Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada. In: Webster RP, Bouchard P, Klimaszewski J (Eds) The Coleoptera of New Brunswick and Canada: providing baseline biodiversity and natural history data. ZooKeys 573: 387–512. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 Abstract All 3,062 species of Coleoptera from 92 families known to occur in New Brunswick, Canada, are re- corded, along with their author(s) and year of publication using the most recent classification framework. Adventive and Holarctic species are indicated. There are 366 adventive species in the province, 12.0% of the total fauna. Keywords Checklist, Coleoptera, New Brunswick, Canada Introduction The first checklist of the beetles of Canada by Bousquet (1991) listed 1,365 species from the province of New Brunswick, Canada. Since that publication, many species have been added to the faunal list of the province, primarily from increased collection efforts and
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report

    Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report

    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
  • Antarctica (Brullea), Mecodema Aberrans, Mecodema Moniliferum and Mecodema Tibiale (Metaglymma); We Synonymise M

    Antarctica (Brullea), Mecodema Aberrans, Mecodema Moniliferum and Mecodema Tibiale (Metaglymma); We Synonymise M

    1 "Tidying up some loose ends....." Dave Seldon *1 1 University of Auckland, School of Biological Sciences, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142 Eligible for student prize Mecodema (Carabidae: Broscini: Nothobroscina) is a hyper-diverse endemic New Zealand genus with species spread throughout the two main islands, as well as many offshore islands. Using specimens from a number of private and institutional collections, plus new specimens acquired by extensive pitfall trapping, we describe / redescribe the North Island Mecodema species. Species descriptions were composed using 126 morphological characters, which include external structures, as well as both male and female internal structures. There are four new combinations: Mecodema antarctica (Brullea), Mecodema aberrans, Mecodema moniliferum and Mecodema tibiale (Metaglymma); we synonymise M. occiputale under M. curvidens, and M. sulcatum under M. oblongum. We describe 25 new species, 13 of which are found in Northland and Auckland regions, while six are described from Hawke’s Bay / East Cape regions. This research increases the total number of described Mecodema species to 103, and will give a modern taxonomic framework to complete the revision of the South Island species. 2 Phylogenetics of New Zealand weevils Richard Leschen *1, Talia Brav-Cubitt 1, Thomas Buckley 1, Sam Brown 2, Steve Davis 3 1 Landcare, Auckland 2 Plant & Food, Auckland 3 American Museum of Natural History, New York Folks may be familiar with New Zealand species like the Giraffe Weevil, Lasiorhynchus barbicornis Lacordaire (Brentidae), Spear Grass weevils (Hadrampus Broun) and a number of the strange cryptically coloured genera of Eugnomini. But these icons are just a small part of the New Zealand fauna, which contains approximately 1200 described species placed in 243 genera.
  • 2006 - Biodiversity and Cultural Diversity in the Andes and Amazon 1: Biodiversity

    2006 - Biodiversity and Cultural Diversity in the Andes and Amazon 1: Biodiversity

    Lyonia 9(1) 2006 - Biodiversity and Cultural Diversity in the Andes and Amazon 1: Biodiversity Volume 9 (1) February 2006 ISSN: 0888-9619 Introduction In 2001, the 1. Congress of Conservation of Biological and Cultural Diversity in the Andes and the Amazon Basin in Cusco, Peru, attempted to provide a platform to bridge the existing gap between Scientists, Non Governmental Organizations, Indigenous Populations and Governmental Agencies. This was followed by a 2. Congress in 2003, held in Loja, Ecuador together with the IV Ecuadorian Botanical Congress. The most important results of these conferences were published in Lyonia 6 (1/2) and 7 (1/2) 2004. Since then, the "Andes and Amazon" Biodiversity Congress has become a respected institution, and is being held every two years in Loja, Ecuador, where it has found a permanent home at the Universidad Tecnica Particular. In 2005, the 3. Congres on Biological and Cultural Diversity of the Andes and Amazon Basin joined efforts with the 2. Dry Forest Congress and the 5. Ecuadorian Botanical Congress, to provide an even broader venue. The Tropical Dry Forests of Latin America as well as the Andes and the Amazon Basin represent one of the most important Biodiversity-Hotspots on Earth. At the same time, both systems face imminent dangers due to unsustainable use. Attempts of sustainable management and conservation must integrate local communities and their traditional knowledge. Management decisions need to include the high importance of natural resources in providing building materials, food and medicines for rural as well as urbanized communities. The traditional use of forest resources, particularly of non-timber products like medicinal plants, has deep roots not only in indigenous communities, but is practiced in a wide section of society.
  • From Characters of the Female Reproductive Tract

    From Characters of the Female Reproductive Tract

    Phylogeny and Classification of Caraboidea Mus. reg. Sci. nat. Torino, 1998: XX LCE. (1996, Firenze, Italy) 107-170 James K. LIEBHERR and Kipling W. WILL* Inferring phylogenetic relationships within Carabidae (Insecta, Coleoptera) from characters of the female reproductive tract ABSTRACT Characters of the female reproductive tract, ovipositor, and abdomen are analyzed using cladi­ stic parsimony for a comprehensive representation of carabid beetle tribes. The resulting cladogram is rooted at the family Trachypachidae. No characters of the female reproductive tract define the Carabidae as monophyletic. The Carabidac exhibit a fundamental dichotomy, with the isochaete tri­ bes Metriini and Paussini forming the adelphotaxon to the Anisochaeta, which includes Gehringiini and Rhysodini, along with the other groups considered member taxa in Jeannel's classification. Monophyly of Isochaeta is supported by the groundplan presence of a securiform helminthoid scle­ rite at the spermathecal base, and a rod-like, elongate laterotergite IX leading to the explosion cham­ ber of the pygidial defense glands. Monophyly of the Anisochaeta is supported by the derived divi­ sion of gonocoxa IX into a basal and apical portion. Within Anisochaeta, the evolution of a secon­ dary spermatheca-2, and loss ofthe primary spermathcca-I has occurred in one lineage including the Gehringiini, Notiokasiini, Elaphrini, Nebriini, Opisthiini, Notiophilini, and Omophronini. This evo­ lutionary replacement is demonstrated by the possession of both spermatheca-like structures in Gehringia olympica Darlington and Omophron variegatum (Olivier). The adelphotaxon to this sper­ matheca-2 clade comprises a basal rhysodine grade consisting of Clivinini, Promecognathini, Amarotypini, Apotomini, Melaenini, Cymbionotini, and Rhysodini. The Rhysodini and Clivinini both exhibit a highly modified laterotergite IX; long and thin, with or without a clavate lateral region.
  • East Gippsland, Victoria

    East Gippsland, Victoria

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G

    A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
  • Rote Liste Ka Fer Band 2 Landesnaturschutzgesetz

    Rote Liste Ka Fer Band 2 Landesnaturschutzgesetz

    Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Die Käfer Schleswig-Holsteins Rote Liste Band 2 Herausgeber: Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein (MLUR) Erarbeitung durch: Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein Hamburger Chaussee 25 24220 Flintbek Tel.: 0 43 47 / 704-0 www.llur.schleswig-holstein.de Ansprechpartner: Arne Drews (Tel. 0 43 47 / 704-360) Autoren: Stephan Gürlich Roland Suikat Wolfgang Ziegler Titelfoto: Macroplea mutica (RL 1), Langklauen-Rohrblattkäfer, 7 mm, Familie Blattkäfer, Unterfamilie Schilfkäfer galt bereits als ausgestorben. Die Art konnte aber in neuerer Zeit in den Seegraswiesen der Orther Reede auf Fehmarn wieder nachgewiesen werden. Die Käferart vollzieht ihren gesamten Lebenszyklus vollständig submers und gehört gleichzeitig zu den ganz wenigen Insektenarten, die im Salzwasser leben können. Dieses einzige an der schleswig-hol- steinischen Ostseeküste bekannte Vorkommen ist in den dortigen Flachwasserzonen durch Wassersport gefährdet. (Foto: R. Suikat) Herstellung: Pirwitz Druck & Design, Kronshagen Dezember 2011 ISBN: 978-3-937937-54-0 Schriftenreihe: LLUR SH – Natur - RL 23 Band 2 von 3 Diese Broschüre wurde auf Recyclingpapier hergestellt. Diese Druckschrift wird im Rahmen der Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der schleswig- holsteinischen Landesregierung heraus- gegeben. Sie darf weder von Parteien noch von Personen, die Wahlwerbung oder Wahlhilfe betreiben, im Wahl- kampf zum Zwecke der Wahlwerbung verwendet werden. Auch ohne zeit- lichen Bezug zu einer bevorstehenden Wahl darf die Druckschrift nicht in einer Weise verwendet werden, die als Partei- nahme der Landesregierung zu Gunsten einzelner Gruppen verstanden werden könnte. Den Parteien ist es gestattet, die Druckschrift zur Unterrichtung ihrer eigenen Mitglieder zu verwenden.
  • Revision of the Genus Caledonica (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)

    Revision of the Genus Caledonica (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae)

    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 15.xi.2016 Volume 56(2), pp. 567–628 ISSN 0374-1036 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A9C852F-454C-41BC-B423-B1D8CA6287A8 Revision of the genus Caledonica (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) Arnošt KUDRNA Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. A revision of the endemic New Caledonian tiger beetle genus Caledonica Chaudoir, 1860 is presented based on the examination of more than 600 speci- mens including the relevant type material. Neotype is designated for Distipsidera mediolineata Lucas, 1862 and Distipsidera Mniszechii Thomson, 1856 as the original type material is lost. Oxycheila arrogans Montrouzier, 1860 is recognized as an unavailable name because it was proposed in synonymy and is replaced by Caledonica tuberculata Fauvel, 1882, stat. restit. The following new synonymy is proposed: Oxycheila affi nis Montrouzier, 1860 = Caledonica affi nis var. lerati Fleutiaux, 1911, syn. nov. Caledonica luiggiorum sp. nov. and C. rivalieriana sp. nov. are described as new to science. Males of two species, C. longicollis Fauvel, 1903 and C. rubicondosa Deuve, 2006, are described for the fi rst time. Rede- scriptions of all species are given. A dichotomous key to species and subspecies is provided, and a brief history of the taxonomy and nomenclature of this genus is also given. Biology and distribution of most species and behaviour of adults in their biotopes, based on the authorʼs own fi eld research and observations during his three surveys in New Caledonia are presented. Each species is described in detail; its habitus and diagnostic characters are illustrated in colour photographs.
  • Beetles in a Suburban Environment: a New Zealand Case Study. The

    Beetles in a Suburban Environment: a New Zealand Case Study. The

    tl n brbn nvrnnt: lnd td tl n brbn nvrnnt: lnd td h Idntt nd tt f Clptr n th ntrl nd dfd hbtt f nfld Alnd (4-8 GKhl . : rh At SI lnt rttn Mnt Albrt rh Cntr rvt Alnd lnd • SI lnt rttn prt • EW EAA EAME O SCIEIIC A IUSIA ESEAC 199 O Ο Ν Ε W Ε Ν ttr Grnt rd Τ Ε Ρ Ο Ι Ο Τ ie wi e suo o a oey Sciece eseac Ga om e ew eaa oey Gas oa is suo is gaeuy ackowege Ρ EW EAA SI ' EAME O lnt SCIEIIC A rttn IUSIA Wāhn ESEAC Mn p Makig Sciece Wok o ew eaa KUSCE G eees i a suua eiome a ew eaa case suy e ieiy a saus o Coeoea i e aua a moiie aias o yie Aucka (197-199 / G Kusce — Aucka SI 199 (SI a oecio eo ISS 11-1 ; o3 IS -77-59- I ie II Seies UC 5957(93111 © Cow Coyig uise y SI a oecio M Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa eceme 199 ie y Geea iig Seices eso ew eaa Etiam pristina in aua Asο i a aua seig summa securitas et futura sweet tranquility and nature ., OISIECE e oe-eeig emoyci eee ioycus uuus (ou o is aie ooca os kaikaea (acycaus acyioies om e yie eee suey aea Aucka ew eaa e wie gaues o e eee ae oe cuses a ass ees is eee as a eic saus o uike a o e uaaa (Seoo as ossi eiece sows a e weei gou was iig i uassic imes way ack i e ea o e iosaus a gymosems moe a 1 miio yeas ago OEWO As a small boy in the 1930s I used to collect butterflies on the South Downs in southern England.
  • The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?

    The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?

    The Little Things that Run the City How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Luis Mata, Christopher D. Ives, Georgia E. Garrard, Ascelin Gordon, Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk, Kirsten Parris and Sarah A. Bekessy The Little Things that Run the City – How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Report prepared for the City of Melbourne, November 2015 Coordinating authors Luis Mata Christopher D. Ives Georgia E. Garrard Ascelin Gordon Sarah Bekessy Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group Centre for Urban Research School of Global, Urban and Social Studies RMIT University 124 La Trobe Street Melbourne 3000 Contributing authors Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk and Kirsten Parris. Cover artwork by Kate Cranney ‘Melbourne in a Minute Scavenger’ (Ink and paper on paper, 2015) This artwork is a little tribute to a minute beetle. We found the brown minute scavenger beetle (Corticaria sp.) at so many survey plots for the Little Things that Run the City project that we dubbed the species ‘Old Faithful’. I’ve recreated the map of the City of Melbourne within the beetle’s body. Can you trace the outline of Port Phillip Bay? Can you recognise the shape of your suburb? Next time you’re walking in a park or garden in the City of Melbourne, keep a keen eye out for this ubiquitous little beetle.