The Red Cross Society of Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Red Cross Society of Georgia The Red Cross Society of Georgia Founded: 1918 Members: 10,200 (2005) Volunteers: 1,050 (2005) Staff: 61 (2005) Expenditure: 208,887 GEL 146,708 CHF (January-July, 2005) 1. Foundation Mission In 2003, the Red Cross Society of Georgia adopted a new mission and vision, which convey the essence of the organisation’s existence, its values and aspirations to improve the lives of vulnerable people. The mission of the Red Cross Society of Georgia is ‘to assist vulnerable people in coping with the effects of emergencies and socio-economic crisis by mobilizing the power of humanity and ensuring appropriate means and services to protect human life and dignity’. Its vision is to become ‘a strong and well-functioning national society, responsive to and focused on the vulnerable, with efficient services in line with international standards and promoting creation of an environment that is free from poverty, violence and prejudice’. The focus and priorities of the national society’s work are detailed in the national society strategy paper for 2004-2005, which is now being revisited and adjusted based on the analysis of internal and external environment. The objective is to establish a relevant and pragmatic plan, which will guide the national society over the coming four years (2006-2009). Legal base The Red Cross Society of Georgia was formally recognized under the former Soviet structure and, after independence, by presidential decree in 1993. The Red Cross law was passed by the parliament in 1997. The same year, the national society became a member of the International Federation. The Georgian Red Cross statutes were revised to distinguish between governance and management functions and to ensure compliance with the national legislation and the Federation’s minimum requirements. The Joint Federation and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) Statutory Commission in Geneva has reviewed the latest draft, which will now be presented to the General Assembly of the national socie ty for adoption by the end of 2005. Constituency The national society structure covers all administrative regions of the country except a breakaway region of Abkhazia, in western Georgia. The national society was able to re-establish some presence in the disputed territory of South Ossetia, where two primary Red Cross organisations (community groups attached to the Red Cross) were established. The Red Cross has in total 10 regional and 74 branch offices (including 10 branches in the capital Tbilisi). Capacities of the Red Cross branches were mapped in 2004 through a comprehensive assessment conducted jointly by the Georgian Red Cross, the Federation and the ICRC. 59 of 75 branches were visited to collect information on their legal status, foundation, structures, human, material and financial resources, the scope of work and involvement with the communities. The remaining 16 branches, mainly in western Georgia, were covered by the ICRC. The assessment revealed that: 1 · 34.5 per cent of the branches assessed have a basic capacity that include premises, human resources and limited activities implemented in partnership with other organisations (these branches received less then two points according to the CAPI1 scoring scale of one to five, in which one point is the highest indicator and five is the lowest). · 30.6 per cent have 20 and more volunteers. · Three Red Cross branches (6.1 per cent) do not have volunteers and have been classified among the weakest branches. · Five branches in Tbilisi, one in Kvemo Kartli region, three is Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti region and another three in Adjara region have been identified as the strongest branches. 2. Capacity Leadership The general assembly elects president and 11 members of the presidium, which meets at least every three months. In 1999 a position of secretary general was introduced and was filled in April 2004. Decisions regarding policy are centralized in the office of the Red Cross president. Operating and financial issues are managed by the Red Cross secretariat headed by the secretary general. Human resources The Red Cross Society of Georgia employs 61 people (21 at the national headquarters and 40 at regional/branch level). Salaries in the national society are lower compared to other non-governmental organisations in the country. Red Cross has about 1,050 volunteers who are involved in its various activities. Financial resources The society’s expenditure in 2005 (as of 1 July 2005) was GEL 208,887 (CHF 146,708). Almost all Red Cross funding currently comes via the Federation’s annual appeals, the ICRC and few other international donors. There are very little domestic sources of income. Red Cross regional and branch offices have made efforts to raise funds locally, but with not much success. Material resources The Red Cross Society of Georgia owns its headquarters building, a warehouse in Tbilisi, a number of computers, some office equipment, and seven operational vehicles. Most material resources have been financed and/or donated by the Federation Secretariat and the ICRC. In regions, Red Cross branches experience shortage of material resources including office space, equipment and furniture. Organisation/planning Since 2003, the Red Cross has been rebuilding the organisation that ceased operating during uncertainty over its leadership in 2001-2002. The focus has been on improving Red Cross legal base as well as on strengthening management and governance functions, which is essential for the effective functioning of the organisation. The Statutes of the Red Cross Society of Georgia was revised. Regulations, rules and procedures were established for the governance and management to increase effectiveness of their performance. The national society has advanced in its strategic planning for 2006-2009. The plan will enable the Red Cross to realise its objectives in a consistent way. The finance management system and mechanisms have been established too to improve the accountability. Branch development strategy is in preparation. Efforts have been made to improve communication within the national society – between the headquarters and branches. A number of community-based projects have been initiated too in few regions via participatory approach (Participatory Community Development). 1 Customised Assessment and Performance indicators, a self-assessment methodology. 2 Partnerships The Red Cross Society of Georgia cooperates with various ministries and institutions in the country, particularly the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Interior (Emergency and Civil Safety Department), as well as Ministry of Refugees and Accommodation. Dialogue has been initiated with the local authorities too to ensure coordination and support for Red Cross community work. Although the number of non-Movement partners has increased over the last three years, it is still modest. The national society is determined to continue fostering bilateral relations and it is hoped, the positive changes of the recent years will encourage more organisations to work with it. In terms of Movement partners, several national societies work with the Red Cross Society of Georgia through the Federation’s annual and/or emergency appeals: the British Red Cross, Norwegian Red Cross, Finish Red Cross, German Red Cross and Swedish Red Cross. The British Red Cross also works bilaterally with the Red Cross Society of Georgia supporting a project in Kutaisi, west Georgia, that aims at breaking the isolation of single elderly people. The ICRC has been present in Georgia since 1992. It has a delegation in Tbilisi and 359, includin g 24 expatriate, staff in the country. It is helping the national society in dissemination of the International Humanitarian Law and the Movement’s Fundamental Principles, as well as strengthening the tracing service of the Red Cross. The Federation Secretariat has been assisting its member national society to reduce vulnerability in the country since 1993, mainly in relief with an increasing emphasis on development and capacity building. In 2001, due to the uncertainty over the leadership of the Red Cross, the Federation’s presence in Georgia was reduced. The Secretariat maintained a small office in Tbilisi to liaise with the national society, international organizations, and authorities of Georgia, and monitor the developments in the national society. In early 2002, the new president of the Red Cross Society of Georgia was confirmed. A new presidium was elected, and new senior staff members were appointed. Encouraged by a change process initiated by the national society and considering huge humanitarian needs on the ground, the Federation has re-engaged its support to help the Red Cross re-build its institutional capacities to support vulnerable people. The move paved the way for a new phase in the life of the Red Cross, offering it an opportunity to play an important role in alleviating suffering and improving lives of people in this poor country. The Federation Secretariat maintains a country delegation in Tbilisi with an internationally recruited delegate and three local staff. Additional support is provided from the Federation regional delegation in Ankara. 3. Performance Activities The main activities of the Red Cross include: · Strengthening capacities of the targeted branches to deliver tailored services through a participatory community development approach: this approach supports people to reduce the causes of their own predicaments and mobilizes
Recommended publications
  • 1 Women in Search of Peace
    WWomenomen iinn SSearchearch ooff PPeaceeace 1 2 WWomenomen iinn SSearchearch ooff PPeaceeace Cultural-Humanitarian Foundation “Sukhumi” Ekaterine Gamakharia Women in Search of Peace The Perspectives of the Women of Georgia on Peaceful Future Concluding document of the joint project of Cultural-Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi“ (Kutaisi) and Association of Women of Abkhazia (Sukhum/i) z Published with the support of Swedish International Women’s Organization KVINNA TILL KVINNA KUTAISI 2012 4 About the Author The main focus of Ekaterine Gamakharia’s work is on human rights, particularly those of women and of internally displaced people (IDPs). Ekaterine Gamakharia is a participant of a number of national and international conferences, trainings and seminars on women’s rights, confl ict resolution and peace-building. Her fi rst employment was with Cultural Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi”. In 2000-2006 she was the Director of the Women’s Rights Protection Division there. She still continues to work for Fund “Sukhumi” as a consultant. In 2006 Ekaterine Gamakharia was awarded the John Smith Memorial Trust Fellowship to study democratic institutions in Great Britain. In 2006-2007 she was awarded Edmund Muskie Fellowship to study international human rights law in the US. In 2006-2007 she completed her Master’s Degree in the International Human Rights Law at Indiana University, US. In 2007-2008 she worked as a National Consultant on IDP issues for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in Tbilisi, Georgia. Since 2008 she has lived in Baku working as a freelance consultant and trainer for various NGOs. Ekaterine Gamakharia is the author of analytic reports, books and manuals: “The Role of Women in Peace Building”, “Women at the Negotiation Table”, “The Road to Peace”, “Phenomenon of Women’s Leadership”, “Gender and Political Parties”, “Local Government and Gender”.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Transport Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map
    Georgia Transport Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is preparing sector assessments and road maps to help align future ADB support with the needs and strategies of developing member countries and other development partners. The transport sector assessment of Georgia is a working document that helps inform the development of country partnership strategy. It highlights the development issues, needs and strategic assistance priorities of the transport sector in Georgia. The knowledge product serves as a basis for further dialogue on how ADB and the government can work together to tackle the challenges of managing transport sector development in Georgia in the coming years. About the Asian Development Bank ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people. Despite the region’s many successes, it remains home to two-thirds of the world’s poor: 1.7 billion people who live on less than $2 a day, with 828 million struggling on less than $1.25 a day. Georgia Transport Sector ADB is committed to reducing poverty through inclusive economic growth, environmentally sustainable growth, and regional integration. Based in Manila, ADB is owned by 67 members, including 48 from the region. Its main Assessment, Strategy, instruments for helping its developing member countries are policy dialogue, loans, equity investments, guarantees, grants, and technical assistance. and Road Map TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS. Georgia. 2014 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines www.adb.org Printed in the Philippines Georgia Transport Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map © 2014 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural-Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi”
    Cultural -Humanitarian Fund “Sukhumi” (The results of the rapid assessment conducted by the Fund “Sukhumi” in its target regions) Ekaterine Gamakharia Fund “Sukhumi” 5/1/2020 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 1. Methodology and Demographics ............................................................................................................. 3 2. Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1. Negative Impact of Covid-19 on the People’s Lives .......................................................................... 4 2.2. Covid-19 Impact on Gender Roles – Unequal Distribution of the Household Responsibilities ........ 5 2.3. Covid-19 Impact on Economic Security............................................................................................. 6 2.4. Covid-19 Impact on the Possibility to Receive Education ................................................................. 8 2.5. Covid-19 Impact on the Physical Safety of Women – Increased Domestic Violence ....................... 9 2.6. Covid-19 Impact on Food Security .................................................................................................. 11 2.7. Covid-19 Impact on Health Security ................................................................................................ 12 2.8. Covid-19 Impact on
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia/Abkhazia
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH ARMS PROJECT HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH/HELSINKI March 1995 Vol. 7, No. 7 GEORGIA/ABKHAZIA: VIOLATIONS OF THE LAWS OF WAR AND RUSSIA'S ROLE IN THE CONFLICT CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................................................5 EVOLUTION OF THE WAR.......................................................................................................................................6 The Role of the Russian Federation in the Conflict.........................................................................................7 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Republic of Georgia ..............................................................................................8 To the Commanders of the Abkhaz Forces .....................................................................................................8 To the Government of the Russian Federation................................................................................................8 To the Confederation of Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus...........................................................................9 To the United Nations .....................................................................................................................................9 To the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe..........................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Focus Group Research
    A PROJECT OF THE INTERNATIONAL REPUBLICAN INSTITUTE GEORGIA FOCUS GROUP RESEARCH QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC OPINION TRENDS FOLLOWING THE 2020 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS GEORGIA FOCUS GROUP RESEARCH QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC OPINION TRENDS FOLLOWING THE 2020 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS Center for Insights in Survey Research IRI.org @IRIglobal © 2021 All Rights Reserved Georgia Focus Group Research: Qualitative Analysis of Public Opinion Trends Following the 2020 Parliamentary Elections Copyright © 2021 International Republican Institute. All rights reserved. Permission Statement: No part of this work may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without the written permission of the International Republican Institute. Requests for permission should include the following information: • The title of the document for which permission to copy material is desired. • A description of the material for which permission to copy is desired. • The purpose for which the copied material will be used and the manner in which it will be used. • Your name, title, company or organization name, telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and mailing address. Please send all requests for permission to: Attn: Department of External Affairs International Republican Institute 1225 Eye Street NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] IRI | Georgia - Focus Group Research Following 2020 Elections 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In April 2021, IPM Market Intelligence Caucasus, on Key Findings behalf of the International Republican Institute’s (IRI) Center for Insights in Survey Research, conducted a — Participants do not see a way out of the political qualitative study of public attitudes toward the 2020 crisis and are frustrated by the inability of the ruling parliamentary elections and recent political events in party and opposition to engage in constructive Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Hepatitis C Care Cascade in the Country of Georgia: Monitoring Progress Towards Elimination
    IVHEM 2019. November 22-23, 2019, Amsterdam EVALUATION OF THE HEPATITIS C CARE CASCADE IN THE COUNTRY OF GEORGIA: MONITORING PROGRESS TOWARDS ELIMINATION Tengiz Tsertsvadze,1,2 Amiran Gamkrelidze,3 Nikoloz Chkhartishvili,1 Akaki Abutidze,1 Lali Sharvadze,2,4 Maia Butsashvili,5 David Metreveli,6 Lia Gvinjilia,7 Shaun Shadaker,8 Muazzam Nasrullah,8 Tamar Gabunia, 9 Ekaterine Adamia,9 Stefan Zeuzem,10 Nezam Afdhal,11 Sanjeev Arora,12 Karla Thornton,12 Francisco Averhoff8 1Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center, Tbilisi, Georgia; 2Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia; 3National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, Tbilisi, Georgia; 4Hepatology clinic HEPA, Tbilisi, Georgia; 5Health Research Union, Tbilisi, Georgia; 6Medical Center Mrcheveli, Tbilisi, Georgia; 7CDC Foundation, Tbilisi, Georgia; 8Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, STD&TB Prevention, Atlanta, USA; 9Ministry of IDPs, Labour, Health and Social Affairs of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia; 10Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany; 11Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Liver Center, Boston, USA; 12University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center Disclosure No relevant financial relationship exists Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center 12 COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE ON TRACK TO ELIMINATE HEPATITIS C INFECTION BY 2030 Georgia’s HCV elimination program builds on delivering
    [Show full text]
  • UNICEF Georgia COVID-19 Situation Report
    UNICEF Georgia COVID-19 Situation Report 20 November 2020 HIGHLIGHTS SITUATION IN NUMBERS • World Children’s Day, 20 November 2020, was celebrated this week. The UNICEF Representative made a video address from Akhalkalaki, where he met 96,860 Confirmed cases with children and young people to discuss the challenges they are experiencing, as well as their vision for the future; And UNICEF National Ambassador Nikoloz Rachveli, called on Government, private sector and civil society to unite for 894 children in these challenging times - For more information, please see WEEKLY Confirmed deaths FOCUS on page 4. • UNICEF, with financial support from USAID, launched a new initiative to 1,327 enhance COVID-19 related risk communication among young people. Child (<18 years) cases • UNICEF’s partner, Children of Georgia (CoG), provided online psychological support to 410 children and 329 caregivers in small group homes and foster care through group and individual sessions. 2,226 • UNICEF’s partner, Adjara Organization of Georgia Scout’s Movement, provided Quarantined training on COVID-19 prevention measures to 415 students in 10 rural public schools in Adjara region. • UNICEF’s partner, Global Initiative in Psychiatry (GIP) continued online training Abkhazia sessions on psychosocial issues for students and teachers of Adjara and Gori Confirmed cases – 5,278 public schools reaching 952 students and 134 teachers. Confirmed deaths – 67 • UNICEF delivered agricultural equipment to 78 households, reaching 251 children and 212 adults in Abkhazia region. UNICEF funding gap • UNICEF provided food parcels, hygiene supplies and basic medical kits to 398 US$ 1,841,399 (42%) families in need, including 2,231 children and 989 adults in the Abkhazia region.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG3118 V8 Public Disclosure Authorized Sub-Project: Restoration and Internal Repairing Works in Train Station and Local Self Government Building, and Restoration of Small Size Pedestrian Bridges in Public Disclosure Authorized Tskaltubo Environmental Screening and Environmental Management Plan Public Disclosure Authorized WORLD BANK (WB) FINANCED SECOND REGIONAL DEVELOPMNET PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental Screening and Classification The subproject (SP) site is located in West Georgia, Imereti Region, in town Tskaltubo municipality area, at 250 km distance westward to Tbilisi city. The site is accessible via Tbilisi- Kutaisi-Tskaltubo connecting motor road. The project envisages: Rehabilitation of the façade and interior of Sakrebulo building (former police building located in the center of Tskaltubo); Rehabilitation of the Railway Station building and arrangement of the Resort Management Office on the I floor; Rehabilitation of the fountain located in the square in front of the railway station; Rehabilitation of ten (10) small pedestrian bridges (#1; #2; #3; #4; #5; #6; #8; #9; #10; #11) located in the central park area. Bridges are located across the canals of the central park. (A) IMPACT IDENTIFICATION Has the subproject a tangible impact on the The SP has tangible positive social impact. environment? What are the significant beneficial and The SP has a long term positive social impact through the adverse environmental effects of the improvement of living conditions of the local population. subproject? Upgrade of the visual appearance of the town will improve quality of life and optimize the social and economic development. The expected negative environmental and social impacts are likely to be short term and typical for small to medium scale rehabilitation works: noise, dust, vibration, and emissions from the operation of construction machinery; generation of construction waste; disruption of traffic and pedestrian access.
    [Show full text]
  • Kutaisi Investment Catalogue
    Kutaisi has always been attractive for innovative projects with its historic and cultural importance. In order to succeed, any business must have a stable and reliable environment, and it can be eagerly said that our city is a springboard for it. An investor thinks what kind of comfort he or she will have with us. Kutaisi is ready to share examples of successful models of the world and promote business development. Giorgi Chigvaria Mayor of Kutaisi 1 Contact Information City Hall of Kutaisi Municipality Rustaveli Avenue 3, Kutaisi. George Giorgobiani [Position] Mobile: +995 551 583158 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.kutaisi.gov.ge Imereti Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry Emzar Gvinianidze Rustaveli Avenue 124, Kutaisi. Phone: +995 431 271400/271401 Mobile: +995 577 445484/597 445484 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Disclaimer: This catalogue is prepared by international expert Irakli Matkava with support of the USAID Good Governance Initiative (GGI). The author’s views expressed in the publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Agency for International Development, GGI or the US Government. 2 What can Kutaisi offer? Business development opportunities - Kutaisi is the main of western Georgia offering access to a market of 900,000 customers, low property prices and labour costs, and multimodal transport infrastructure that is also being upgraded and expanded. Infrastructure projects for business development - Up to 1 billion GEL is being spent on the modernization of the city’s infrastructure, enabling Kutaisi to become a city of with international trade and transit role and markedly boosting its tourism potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Art Route
    Georgian Art Route Georgian art has evolved for millennia. With roots in rich archaic and ethnic traditions, it has grown along with the development of the Georgian statehood, starting from the ancient kingdoms of Colchis and Iberia. From the ancient monuments and fascinating old buildings to the contemporary art galleries and museums, there are so many reasons to travel to Georgia to develop your artistic skills and explore your passion for painting, sculpture, architecture and design. With our exclusive Art Tour to Georgia you will visit all must-see art places, get acquainted with the masterpieces of Georgian painters, explore art galleries and various museums. You will feel the tradition of Georgian art and get inspired for your new art ideas. Key information Duration: 7 days / 6 nights Best season: May - October Tour type: Small group / individual (starting from 2 persons) What’s included: Private airport transfers according to your arrival time, Accommodation in hotels for 6 nights (in double rooms), Meals: breakfast, All transfers in air-conditioned/heated cars/buses, English speaking guide service for all days, All admission fees (Narikala cable car, National Gallery, Sighnaghi Museum, Mirzaani Niko Firosmani museum, David Kakabadze Museum, Prometheus cave, Batumi Botanical garden), Wine tasting and master-class (Khareba winery) What’s not included: Flights, Visa fee, Medical insurance, Lunches and dinners Itinerary in brief Day 1 - Arrival Day 2 - Art Tour to Tbilisi Day 3 - Kakheti - Sighnaghi - Khareba Day 4 - Bagrati - Gelati - Kutaisi Day 5 - Prometheus Caves - Adjara Museum - Batumi Day 6 - Batumi - Mtskheta - Tbilisi Day 7 - Departure Detailed itinerary Day 1 Arrival at the airport, transfer to the hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Georgia in 2014
    2014 Minerals Yearbook GEORGIA U.S. Department of the Interior December 2017 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUSTRY OF GEORGIA By Elena Safirova Prior to the proclamation of Georgia’s independence in company $200 million to build. With a total capacity of 1991, a range of mineral commodities were mined in Georgia, 87 megawatts (MW), the new powerplant was the largest among including arsenic, barite, bentonite, coal, copper, diatomite, all powerplants built in the country in the past 35 years. The lead, manganese, zeolites, and zinc. The country’s metallurgical company expected that the energy produced at the Paravani sector produced ferroalloys and steel. Production of many of powerplant would be consumed domestically during the these mineral commodities ceased or had been significantly winter, and it would be exported to Turkey in the summer reduced since 1991 because many supply chains were severed (AFN.by, 2014). after the disintegration of the Soviet Union. In the middle of the past decade, the Government of Georgia Minerals in the National Economy sought to position the country as a transit hub between Europe and Asia. As a result, the country emphasized making In 2014, the nominal gross domestic product (GDP) of improvements to its transportation and energy infrastructure and Georgia increased by 2.4% to $16.5 billion1 compared with logistics systems. In 2014, Georgia continued the modernization that of 2013. The country’s real GDP increased by 4.8% in and partial construction of its East-West gas pipeline; several 2014 compared with that of 2013. The share of industrial new gas network links were to be constructed.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA Second Edition March 2010
    WHO DOES WHAT WHERE IN DISASTER RISK REDUCTION IN GEORGIA Second edition March 2010 Georgian National Committee of Disaster Risk Reduction & Environment Sustainable Development FOREWORD Georgia is a highly disaster-prone country, which frequently experiences natural hazards (e.g. earthquakes, floods, landslides, mudflows, avalanches, and drought) as well as man-made emergencies (e.g. industrial accidents and traffic accidents). Compounding factors such as demographic change, unplanned urbanization, poorly maintained infrastructure, lax enforcement of safety standards, socio-economic inequities, epidemics, environmental degradation and climate variability amplify the frequency and intensity of disasters and call for a proactive and multi-hazard approach. Disaster risk reduction is a cross-cutting and complex development issue. It requires political and legal commitment, public understanding, scientific knowledge, careful development planning, responsible enforcement of policies and legislation, people-centred early warning systems, and effective disaster preparedness and response mechanisms. Close collaboration of policy-makers, scientists, urban planners, engineers, architects, development workers and civil society representatives is a precondition for adopting a comprehensive approach and inventing adequate solutions. Multi-stakeholder and inter-agency platforms can help provide and mobilize knowledge, skills and resources required for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into development policies, for coordination of planning and programmes,
    [Show full text]