Map 65 Lycia-Pisidia Compiled by C. Foss (West) and S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Map 65 Lycia-Pisidia Compiled by C. Foss (West) and S Map 65 Lycia-Pisidia Compiled by C. Foss (west) and S. Mitchell, 1994 Introduction The map covers a large segment of south-west Asia Minor, extending from the southern edge of Phrygia in the north to the Mediterranean coastline. The most striking feature is the western extremity of the Taurus mountain range, which dominates the entire landscape of Pisidia and Lycia. In the north-east are the internally drained lake basins of Trogitis (Lake Suğla), Karalis (Lake Beyşehir), Lake Eğridir (E1-2, ancient name unknown), and Ascanius (Burdur Lake). The mountains to the south of these contain the sources of three major rivers, which flow down through Pisidia to the Pamphylian plain–the Melas, Eurymedon and Kestros. Both Pamphylia and Pisidia contained large populations in antiquity, occupying a dense network of city-states, up to ten in Pamphylia and over fifty in Pisidia. Pisidia was accessible by some of the most important routes of southern Asia Minor, in particular the road built by the first Roman proconsul of Asia, M’. Aquillius, between 129 and 126 B.C. from Pergamum (Map 56 E3) to Side (French 1991), and the Augustan Via Sebaste, which ran from Perge to Pisidian Antioch (Map 62 F5). The historical geography of this region has been much advanced in many recent studies–by Bean, Mitchell and Nollé especially (note the overview in Mitchell 1998b)–and the pace of discovery shows no signs of slowing. Current research by Turkish scholars is beginning to throw important new light on the border zone between southern Pisidia and eastern Lycia to the west of Attalea. Above all, the sensational discovery at Patara of an inscription erected by the emperor Claudius in A.D. 45 will offer the foundation for a thorough re-appraisal of the historical geography of the entire region between Caunus in the west and Attalea in the east. This stadiasmos–about which only preliminary information has so far been released–contains details of all the routes of the newly annexed Roman province of Lycia, with distances between the cities measured in stades (Şahin 1994). The western part of the map comprises Lycia, the Kibyratis, and an interior region of Caria. The latter two are high plateaus and basins interrupted by mountains and lakes, with a widely scattered population. Historically, the most important of these regions was Lycia, which comprises a coastal zone with many excellent harbors, the broad and fertile valley of the R. Xanthos, and small valleys and basins in the rising country to the north. The coastal zone in particular supported a remarkable number of cities and villages, well known from remains, inscriptions and extensive exploration since the mid-nineteenth century; see especially Foss (1993; 1994). The historical geography of the coast is known from the descriptions of Scylax (fourth century B.C.) and StadMM (third/fourth centuries A.D.). An inscription of Hadrian’s time from Oenoanda (Wörrle 1988) names many unidentified villages, as does the sixth-century life of St Nicholas of Holy Zion. Remains of aqueducts have been identified at the following cities, but in the absence of detailed publication it is impossible to mark them on the map: Antiochia ad Maeandrum, Apamea (D1), Hierapolis, Laodicea ad Lycum, Trapezopolis (Weber 1904). MAP 65 LYCIA-PISIDIA 997 Directory All place names are in Turkey unless otherwise noted Abbreviations IK 37 J. Nollé, Die Inschriften von Selge, Bonn, 1991 IK 43 J. Nollé, Side im Altertum I, Bonn, 1993 TIB Galatien K. Belke, Tabula Imperii Byzantini 4, Galatien und Lykaonien, DenkWien 172, 1984 TIB Phrygien K. Belke and N. Mersich, Tabula Imperii Byzantini 7, Phrygien und Pisidien,DenkWien211, 1990 Names Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference E4 Ağva CH Özoral 1980 E2 Adada HRL Karabaulo von Aulock 1977, 20-22; TIB Phrygien 170 C4 Aedesa fl. R Ak Çay Bean 1967, 40-41 E2 [Agrai] L Ağras, Atabey Robert 1977, 43-44; TIB Phrygien 172 D4 Akalissos RL Asar Deresi TAM 2.3, 318-22 C5 Akroterion Pr. RL? Ulu Burun StadMM 241-42; C. Foss D3 Alassos R Akören? Corsten 1998, 56-57 A4 Alina? Ins. H Yassıca Ada RE Κρυέων Νῆσοι B4 Aloanda? R Kabaağaç TAM 2.2, 188 G2 Amblada HRL Hisartepe, near Kızılca von Aulock 1977, 22-23; TIB Galatien 122 F1 Anaboura HRL? Enevre RE 2; TIB Phrygien 182-83 C2 Anaua/ C/ Sarı Kavak TIB Phrygien 371 Sanaos HRL D3 Andeda HRL Yavuz, formerly Andya RE Suppl. 12 C5 Andriake RL near Myra RE Ankon Pr. = Pedalion Pr. B4 Antikragos M. HR Buba Dağ RE A2 Antiochia ad Maeandrum HRL Aliağaçiftliği TIB Phrygien 185-88; NPauly 6 C5 Antiphellos/ HRL/ Kaş NPauly Habesos C Antoniopolis = Tripolis ad Maeandrum D1 Apamea/ HRL/ Dinar RE 6; TIB Phrygien 188-89; Kelainai/ CHRL/ Cohen 1995, 281-85; NPauly Kelainai Kibotos R C5 Aperlae RL Sıçak İskelesi PECS A2 Aphrodisias/ RL/ Geyre RE 2; NPauly 1 Ninoe C RE E3 Apollo, T. R Yazılıkaya, Çandır Sterrett 1884, 314-15 C5 Apollonia R Sıçak RE 20; RE Suppl. 1; Bean 1978, 104 Apollonia ad Maeandrum = Tripolis ad Maeandrum B2 Apollonia Salbakes HRL Medet Robert 1954, 235-42; Cohen 1995, 253-55 D1 Apollonia/ HRL/ Uluborlu RE 21; Cohen 1995, 285-90 Mordiaion/ HRL/ Sozopolis L RE Σωζο(ύ)πολις 1; TIB Phrygien 387-88 D1 Aporidos Come HR Eldere Christol 1987, 29-32 B4 Araxa HRL Ören TAM 2.2, 259-62 D3 Ariassos HRL Üçkapı, Bademağaç Mitchell 1991 C5 Arnabanda L Alacahisar Foss 1991, 331 C5 Arneai RL Ernes TAM 2.3, 279-87 B5 Arsada HR Arsa RE Arsinoe = Patara A4 Artemision? Pr. HR Akça Burnu Strabo 14.2.2; C. Foss 998 MAP 65 LYCIA-PISIDIA Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference B5 Artymnissos/ H/ Farilya / Hisar F. Hild Perdikiai R D5 Arycandus fl. R Karasu Çay RE Arykandos D4 Arykanda HRL Aykırca NPauly D4 Arykanda L Arif Harrison 1979, 232 A4 Arymaxa R on Kapıdağ peninsula TAM 2.1, 49-50 E3 Asar HRL Kocaaliler (Melli) Bean 1960, 76-80 F3 Asarbaşı HR IK 37, 17 D2 Ascanius L. HR Burdur Göl RE ’Ασκανία λίµνη 2 § Ascania L. R B2 Asopos? fl. R Gümüş Çay RE Kapros 1 F4 Aspendos/ ACHRL/ Belkis RE Suppl. 12; NPauly Primoupolis L B4 Aspis? Ins. R Katrancık Adasi Pliny, NH 5.131; C. Foss E4 Attalea HRL Antalya RE Suppl. 12 Attaleia; Cohen 1995, 337-38; NPauly Attaleia A2 Attouda HRL Hisar TIB Phrygien 195-96 G4 Augai R Sarapşa? RE C2 Aulindenos? L. R Salda Gölü RE ‘Aulocrene’ L. = Aulutrene L. D1 Aulutrena RL Eldere Christol 1995, 69-81 D1 Aulutrene/ R/ Pınarbaşı / Çapalı Göl Christol 1987, 45-46; TIB Phrygien 197-98 ‘Aulocrene’ L. RL G4 Aunesis R below Hamaxia RE A4 Axon fl. R Kargın Çay Arkwright 1895, 97 G4 Aydolin Kale HRL Bean 1970, 37-41 C4 Balboura HRL Çölkayağı RE Balbura; PECS Balbura; RE Suppl. 14 Balbura D2 Baris RL Farı mevkii, Kılıç TIB Phrygien 206 E2 Bindaios RL Küçük Gökceli, formerly Robert, OMS 3, 1455; TIB Phrygien 213 Findos B4 Boubon HRL Ibecik RE Bubon 1 A2 Brioula RL Billara Ramsay 1895, 191-92 C3 Caularis fl. H Çavdir Çay RE Suppl. 1 Caularis; Bean 1956, 149-50 A4 Caunus CHRL Dalyan RE Kaunos 1 D3 Çaykenarı RL Mitchell 1994, 144-48 D5 Chelidon M. L Markiz Dağ Foss 1991, 326 D5 Chelidoniae Inss. CHRL Beş Adalar RE Χελιδονίδες νῆσοι D5 Chelidonium Pr./ CHR/ Gelidonya Burnu Scylax 100; RE Tauros 5, col. 42 Hiera Akra/ HR/ Tauri Pr. R B5 Chimaera CHR Avlan valley RE Chimaira 2 D5 Chimaera M. HR Yanar Taş RE Chimaira 2 C4 Choma RL near Sarılar Bean 1967 B3 Cibyra HRL Horzum RE Kibyra 1 Cillanicus Tractus = Killanion Pedion Claudioseleucia = Seleucia Col. Iulia Augusta Felix = Cremna Col. Iulia Augusta Hadriana = Parlais Col. Iulia Augusta Prima Fida=Comama Col. Iulia Augusta = Olbasa B2 Colossae CHRL near Honaz RE Kolossai MAP 65 LYCIA-PISIDIA 999 Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference D3 Comama/ RL/ Serefönü, Ürkütlü RE Suppl. 11 Komama Col. Iulia Augusta Prima R Fida E2 Conana/ HRL/ Gönen RE Konane Iustinianopolis? L E2 Cremna/ HRL/ Girme, Çamlık RE Kremna; Mitchell 1988a Col. Iulia Augusta Felix R E5 Cypriae Inss. R Üç Adalar RE Κύπριαι νῆσοι A4 Daidala HR İnlice asarı NPauly 1 A4 Daidala M. RL Kızıldağ RE 5 C5 Damasei? L near Muskar Foss 1991, 331 C5 Dereağzı HRL Morganstern 1993, 162-63 B4 Didymae Inss. R Delikliadalar FOA VIII, 8; RE Didymai 2 E2 Dikmen Tepesi H Waelkens 1997, 37-39 Diokaisareia? = Keretapa? D5 Dionysias/ CR/ Sulu Ada RE 2; RE Krambusa 1 Krambousa Ins. HRL? Diospolis = Laodicea ad Lycum C5 Dolichiste Ins. HR Kekova RE C4 Elbessos H on Girdev Gölü Bean 1978, 175 B2 *Eleinokapria R near Bucalı MAMA 6, 10-11 (no. 19) G3 Emeriye R Bean 1970, 28-29 G3 Erymna RL Örmene RE 2 F3 Etenna HRL Sırt Nollé 1992 E4 Eudokias? L Evdir Han RE Termessos C3 Eukereia HR Manay Asarı Bean 1956, 151 C5 Eunias Nemus R SW Kandyba RE F3 Eurymedon fl. CHRL Köprü Çay RE 1; TIB Phrygien 252-53 F2 Eurymedon, T. R Zindan Mağarası Kaya 1985 A4 Euxine H Kepez Roos 1969, 64 F1 Fele R Mitchell 1978, 93, 95-96 D5 Gagai/ CHRL/ Yenice RE; RE Παλαιὸν Τεῖχος Palaion Teichos H B4 Glaucus fl. R Nif / Kargı Çay RE Glaukos 7 A4 Glaukos/ HR/ Fethiye Körfezi RE Glaukos 4 Telmessicus Sinus HR D3 Gölcük Kale H Woodward 1909, 79; TIB Phrygien 261-62 A2 Görle H? Paton 1900, 63-64 F4 Güğercinlik H RE Pamphylia, col.
Recommended publications
  • SCHEDULE of DIVINE SERVICES- MAY 2021 in the CHURCH of Alanya
    SCHEDULE OF DIVINE SERVICES- MAY 2021 IN THE CHURCH OF Alanya 1 Sat Great Saturday. Venerable John, disciple of St. Gregory of Decapolis (820) 09.00 Vespers and Divine Liturgy of St. Basil the Great 2 Sun The Bright Resurrection of Christ, The Pascha of the Lord.. Easter/Pascha 22.00 (Saturday night) Beginning of the Paschal Service. 11.00 (Sunday morning) The Vespers of Love THE BLESSING OF PASCHAL PRODUCTS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY AGREEMENT Bright Week – Fast-free 3 Mon Venerable Theodore Trichinas (599), St. Nicholas (Velimirovich), bishop of Ochrid and Zhicha,Serbia (1956). St. George, Bishop of Antioch (in Pisidia) 4 Tue "Iveron" Icon of the Most Holy Theotokos. Hieromartyr Theodore of Perge in Pamphylia, his mother Philippa, and Martyrs Dioscorus, Socrates, and Dionysius. 5 Wed Venerable Theodore the Sykeote (613). Venerable Vitalis (609-620). 6 Thu Holy Glorious Great-martyr, Victory-bearer and Wonderworker George (303). Martyr Alexandra the Empress, wife of Diocletian (314). 09.00 Paschal Dicine Liturgy 7 Fri "Life- giving Spring" Icon of the Most Holy Theotokos. 8 Sat Holy Apostle and Evangelist Mark (63). Venerable Sylvester (1379). 09.00 Paschal Divine Liturgy 17.00 All-Nigh Vigil 9 Sun Antipascha, St. Thomas Sunday. Hieromartyr Basil, bishop of Amasea (ca. 322). St. Stephen, bishop of Perm (1396). 08.30 Hours, Confession 09.00 Divine Liturgy 10 Mon Hieromartyr Symeon the Kinsman of the Lord. St. Eulogius the Hospitable of Constantinople. Venerable Stephen, abbot of the Kiev Caves (1094). 1 11 Tue Radonitsa, the Commemoration of the Departed. Apostles Jason of the Seventy (I).
    [Show full text]
  • Georgy Kantor
    Georgy Kantor Lycia et Pamphylia: A Social and Institutional History The project which I am proposing to undertake is a social and institutional history of the Roman province of Lycia and Pamphylia, from the process of establishment of Roman rule in the region in the late Republic and the Julio-Claudian period to the coming of Christianity and the separation of the constituent parts of the province in the early fourth century AD. The project aims at utilising different kinds of evidence – documentary, archaeological, numismatic, literary. Several factors combine to make such a study worthwhile. The isolated nature of the region, separated as it is by mountain ranges from the rest of Anatolia, and the fact that, with a very brief interruption, it has been a single administrative unit for more than two centuries, from the principate of Claudius to at least AD 312, allow us to treat it as a meaningful object of regional history. But below this unity there were striking distinctions between its different parts. In the course of my doctoral work on Roman and local law in the provinces of Asia Minor, I have found preliminary evidence to indicate that the ways in which Pamphylia and Lycia were governed by Rome were different in many crucial aspects. My project will thus provide an opportunity to study two models of Roman rule within one province, and it is at this level that we can best understand how Roman imperial structures worked and contribute to the ongoing discussion (re-opened by recent works of S. Dmitriev and C.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey
    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
    [Show full text]
  • Abd-Hadad, Priest-King, Abila, , , , Abydos, , Actium, Battle
    INDEX Abd-Hadad, priest-king, Akkaron/Ekron, , Abila, , , , Akko, Ake, , , , Abydos, , see also Ptolemaic-Ake Actium, battle, , Alexander III the Great, Macedonian Adaios, ruler of Kypsela, king, –, , , Adakhalamani, Nubian king, and Syria, –, –, , , , Adulis, , –, Aegean Sea, , , , , , –, and Egypt, , , –, , –, – empire of, , , , , , –, legacy of, – –, –, , , death, burial, – Aemilius Paullus, L., cult of, , , Aeropos, Ptolemaic commander, Alexander IV, , , Alexander I Balas, Seleukid king, Afrin, river, , , –, – Agathokleia, mistress of Ptolemy IV, and eastern policy, , and Demetrios II, Agathokles of Syracuse, , –, and Seventh Syrian War, –, , , Agathokles, son of Lysimachos, – death, , , , Alexander II Zabeinas, , , Agathokles, adviser of Ptolemy IV, –, , , –, Alexander Iannai, Judaean king, Aigai, Macedon, , – Ainos, Thrace, , , , Alexander, son of Krateros, , Aitolian League, Aitolians, , , Alexander, satrap of Persis, , , –, , , – Alexandria-by-Egypt, , , , , , , , , , , , , Aitos, son of Apollonios, , , –, , , Akhaian League, , , , , , , –, , , , , , , , , , , , , , Akhaios, son of Seleukos I, , , –, –, , – , , , , , , –, , , , Akhaios, son of Andromachos, , and Sixth Syrian War, –, adviser of Antiochos III, , – Alexandreia Troas, , conquers Asia Minor, – Alexandros, son of Andromachos, king, –, , , –, , , –, , , Alketas, , , Amanus, mountains, , –, index Amathos, Cyprus, and battle of Andros, , , Amathos, transjordan, , Amestris, wife of Lysimachos, , death, Ammonias, Egypt,
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen
    Breakthrough and Concealment: The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Howard Chen All rights reserved ABSTRACT Breakthrough and Concealment: The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen This dissertation analyzes the three main protagonists of Lucan’s Bellum Civile through their attempts to utilize, resist, or match a pattern of action which I call the “formula.” Most evident in Caesar, the formula is a cycle of alternating states of energy that allows him to gain a decisive edge over his opponents by granting him the ability of perpetual regeneration. However, a similar dynamic is also found in rivers, which thus prove to be formidable adversaries of Caesar in their own right. Although neither Pompey nor Cato is able to draw on the Caesarian formula successfully, Lucan eventually associates them with the river-derived variant, thus granting them a measure of resistance (if only in the non-physical realm). By tracing the development of the formula throughout the epic, the dissertation provides a deeper understanding of the importance of natural forces in Lucan’s poem as well as the presence of an underlying drive that unites its fractured world. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ vi Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021
    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Bölüm Antalya'nin Jeolojisi Ve Depremselliği
    TMMOB İNŞAAT MÜHENDİSLERİ ODASI ANTALYA ŞUBESİ 4. BÖLÜM ANTALYA’NIN JEOLOJİSİ VE DEPREMSELLİĞİ 4.1. ANTALYA’NIN COĞRAFİ ÖZELLİĞİ Antalya, Türkiye’nin güneyinde, Akdeniz kıyısında yer almaktadır. Antalya, Burdur ve Isparta illerinin oluşturduğu Batı Akdeniz Bölgesinin en büyük kenti ve merkezi konumundadır. Kıyı kenti ve turizm merkezi olan Antalya’nın körfezi, asimetrik olup güney doğuda Gazipaşa ile güney batıda Yardımcı Burnu arasındaki uzunluğu yaklaşık 280 km. dır. Türkiye topraklarının %2.6’sını oluşturan Antalya İlinde ülke nüfusunun %2.5’i yaşamaktadır. Antalya İli’nin; Merkezi İlçe, Akseki, Alanya, Elmalı, Finike, Gazipaşa, Gündoğmuş, İbradi, Kale, Kaş, Kemer, Korkuteli, Kumluca, Manavgat ve Serik olmak üzere 15 ilçe, 19 bucak ve 545 köyü bulunmaktadır. İlin toplam yüzölçümü 20.723 km2 dir.(4) 4.2. ANTALYA’NIN JEOLOJİSİ VE TEKTONİĞİ Antalya bölgesinde Prekambriye’den günümüze kadar oluşmuş kaya birimleri yüzeylenir. Oldukça farklı ortam koşullarında gelişmiş olan bu kaya birimlerinin bir kısmı otokton, bir kısmı ise allokton konumludur. Antalya bölgesinin batı ve kuzey batısında Beydağları otoktonu, kuzey doğusunda ise Anamas – Akseki otoktonu yeralır. Beydağları otoktonun yaşlı kaya birimleri üzerinde Paleosen ve Eosen çökelekleri bazı alanlarda sığ deniz ortamında çökelmiş karbonatlarla temsil edilirken, bazı alanlarda daha derin deniz ortamında çökelmiş kumtaşı, kiltaşı, kireçtaşı vb. kaya türleri ile temsil edilir. Beydağları otoktonu Daniyen’de Antalya naplarının, Langiyen’de de Likya naplarının yerleşimine sahne olmuştur. Anamas - Akseki otoktonun yaşlı kaya birimleri üzerinde Orta - Üst Triyas yaşlı kumtaşı, kireçtaşı ve şeyl’ler, bu şeyl’ler üzerinde de genellikle Jura - Kretase yaşlı kireçtaşları bulunur. Paleosen-Eosen, Anamas - Akseki otoktonunda kireçtaşı ve kırıntılı kayalarla temsil edilir. Anamas - Akseki otoktonunu güney kenarında Daniyen’de Antalya napları ve Alanya napı yerleşmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Tc. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilmler Enstitüsü Tarih Anabilim Dali
    TC. SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI ORTAÇAĞ ANADOLU’SUNDA İSTANBUL İLE AFYONKARAHİSAR ARASINDAKİ ASKERİ YOL GÜZERGÂHLARI Seda EDİZ 1130204513 YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ DANIŞMAN Doç. Dr. Abdullah BAKIR ISPARTA-2019 (Ediz, Seda, Ortaçağ Anadolu’sunda İstanbul ile Afyonkarahisar Arasındaki Askeri Yol Güzergâhları, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Isparta, 2018) ÖZET Yapılan bu tez çalışmasında İstanbul-Afyonkarahisar arasındaki askeri yol güzergahları ve bu iki şehir arasında kalan bölgenin tarihi coğrafyası hakkında bilgiler verilmektedir. Bu bağlamda öncelikle Eski Çağda bölgenin tarihi coğrafyası ve bu dönemde gerçekleşmiş, söz konusu saha üzerinden yapılan veya bu yollardan geçen savaşlar ele alınmıştır. Ardından Orta Çağda gerçekleşen Bizans Selçuklu mücadeleleri sırasında kullanılan yol güzergahları değerlendirilmiş sonrasında ise I., II., ve III. Haçlı Seferleri esnasında kullanılan yol güzergahları ana kaynaklar ve topografik eserler yardımı ile incelenmeye alınmıştır. Çalışmada konunun aydınlatılmasına yardımcı olması açısından söz konusu sahanın tarihi coğrafyası, Bithynia, Mysia, Troas, Aiolis, Lydia, Ionia ve Phrygia olacak şekilde sırasıyla ele alınmıştır. Tarihi coğrafya incelendikten sonra Eski Çağda bölgeden geçen askeri yol güzergahını kullanmış orduların savaşlarına kronolojik olarak yer verilmiştir. Öncelikle Pers kral yolu değerlendirilmiş ardından, Pers Kralı Kserkses’in Yunanistan Seferi (MÖ. 481-480) sırasında Anadolu’da izlediği yol güzergahı ve savaş esnasında yaşanan olaylara yer verilmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GEOGRAPHY of GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1
    CHAPTER 38 THE GEOGRAPHY OF GALATIA Gal 1:2; Act 18:23; 1 Cor 16:1 Mark Wilson KEY POINTS • Galatia is both a region and a province in central Asia Minor. • The main cities of north Galatia were settled by the Gauls in the third cen- tury bc. • The main cities of south Galatia were founded by the Greeks starting in the third century bc. • Galatia became a Roman province in 25 bc, and the Romans established colonies in many of its cities. • Pamphylia was part of Galatia in Paul’s day, so Perga and Attalia were cities in south Galatia. GALATIA AS A REGION and their families who migrated from Galatia is located in a basin in north-cen- Thrace in 278 bc. They had been invited tral Asia Minor that is largely flat and by Nicomedes I of Bithynia to serve as treeless. Within it are the headwaters of mercenaries in his army. The Galatians the Sangarius River (mode rn Sakarya) were notorious for their destructive and the middle course of the Halys River forays, and in 241 bc the Pergamenes led (modern Kızılırmak). The capital of the by Attalus I defeated them at the battle Hittite Empire—Hattusha (modern of the Caicus. The statue of the dying Boğazköy)—was in eastern Galatia near Gaul, one of antiquity’s most noted the later site of Tavium. The name Galatia works of art, commemorates that victo- derives from the twenty thousand Gauls ry. 1 The three Galatian tribes settled in 1 . For the motif of dying Gauls, see Brigitte Kahl, Galatians Re-imagined: Reading with the Eyes of the Vanquished (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2010), 77–127.
    [Show full text]