No News at Hughes a Change of Name the Main Objectives

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

No News at Hughes a Change of Name the Main Objectives Parade and Project Jennifer by Lloyd Shearer roject Jennifer, the supposedly minerals, and that the Summa Corp., rine in the Atlantic. partial recovery of a sunken formerly the Hughes Tool Corp., The Times had the wrong ocean, Soviet submarine, has become owned entirely by Howard Hughes, but it was the first corroboration this p one of the most widely publi- was determined to make it a profitable reporter could obtain of his original cized operations in the 28-year his- enterprise. source. tory of the Central Intelligence All other questions concerning a Immediately I phoned William Agency. secret project, Russian-speaking deep Colby, director of the CIA, and asked In September, 1974, however, when sea divers, a sunken ship, the CIA, him to confirm or deny several allega- PARADE first heard of the project, it and the U.S. Navy, were quickly and tions concerning Project Jennifer. was a most closely secured top secret, deftly turned aside. As soon as Colby heard the name, and there was no indication that any No news at Hughes Jennifer, he said, "Listen, we can't other publication in the world had discuss this on the telephone. I'll have Phone calls for help to Richard heard of it. someone out to see you in a few Hannah, one of the most knowledge- As this reporter sought to follow up hours." able men in the country on the ways and check out various angles and ru- and means of Howard Hughes—Han- mors, many of them with the Summa A change of name nah handles the Hughes public rela- Corp. in Houston, Tex., that it was tions account—proved friendly but "Let's change her name to Bar- hiring Russian-speaking deep sea div- fruitless. Hannah said he knew noth- bara," [Colby's wife's name] I sug- ers, that it was conducting a Russian ing of any sunken submarine. gested, "and just chat for a minute." language school aboard the Hughes PARADE's source, however, was "No," Colby insisted, "not on the Glomar Explorer, that it was in fact zeroed in on telephone. This one is far too impor- paying the Glomar's crew as much as the details of Project Jennifer, later termed Project Azorian, tant. I'll have someone in touch with $40,000 a voyage—he was told that and was confident it would surface you right away." the Hughes Glomar Explorer, con- Within a few minutes a CIA case "because so many men are involved structed in the Chester, Pa., ship- in it." officer based in Los Angeles phoned. yards, was involved in recovering Sure enough, The Los Angeles We made an appointment to meet at manganese nodules from the Pacific Times early in February, this year, my home. He arrived with another 1975 ocean floor. He was informed further published a front-page story about the agent. that other corporations such as Ten- robbery of Howard Hughes' Holly- Both confirmed in detail the CIA neco and Kennecott were also en- wood office on Romaine Street and project and both urged in the name of gaged in the same sort of exploration, the disappearance of a top secret national security that PARADE not that the sea bottom was in fact a memo involving Hughes with the CIA publish the story. If PARADE did, treasure house of valuable ARADE • MAY and needed recovery of a sunken Soviet subma- they maintained, it would make it ex- P N O ington. Chuck Morgan of the Ameri- ceedingly difficult for the Hughes can Civil Liberties Union has been Glomar Explorer to return to the site telling it to almost everyone in the of the sunken Soviet submarine this National Press Building. What's your July or August and try to recover the opinion?" two-thirds of the Soviet sub it had not "My opinion," I said, "is that the recovered. CIA wants the story out. At a time The main objectives when it's been accused of meddling in domestic affairs, when it's being in- What the CIA wanted most was the vestigated by several Congressional Soviet code machinery, logs, nuclear- committees, it can point to Project tipped torpedoes, and other equip- Jennifer as a superb covert operation. ment it had not brought up. Just imagine putting together a project According to its agents no other involving more than 4000 men and publication—they thought there were keeping it secret for seven years." two, The New York Times and The A moment of silence at Anderson's Los Angeles Times which knew about end of the phone. "You're probably the project—would break it. right. Why don't you write the story There is neither time nor space as you know it. After all, it's our job here to comment on the information, to get the news and print it, or how judgment, honor, and commitment of else are the people going to find it various CIA operatives. Eventually out?" Jack Anderson, the columnist and I told Anderson I would. Here it is. PARADE's Washington bureau chief, did break the story on radio, explain- ing to me "the story's all over Wash- ' Jenni- ers was to deceive observers (including Soviet fishing ships) into believing The 36,000-ton Hughes Glomar Explorer was used in secret CIA Project that the Explorer was deep sea mining. The plan involved 4000 persons. fer—an effort to raise a sunken Soviet sub. The purpose of the structural tow- - - • During recovery operations, the barge, shown open, rested 150 feet beneath the Explorer. The CIA, as a cover, registered both vessels under the name of Howard Hughes. Consequently, Hughes is now liable for property tax on $350 million to the state of California—a tax that comes to about $9 million. The size of a football field, the barge, shown closed and at anchor, had fitted into its bottom—so no one could see it—a 6-million-pound claw. Lowered three miles to grab the sub, it reportedly dredged up a third of the vessel. arly in March of 1968 a diesel- uncoded language over the marine dis- powered Soviet submarine of the tress channels for the submarine to G or Golf class, departed Vladi- identify its location. E vostok and proceeded southeast on The U.S. Navy monitored these dis- a test voyage. tress calls. In May the Soviets gave up Originally constructed in 1958 it had their search. Our Navy thereupon weni been remodeled and equipped with at least two nuclear-tipped torpedoes. Approximately 750 miles northwest of the Hawaiian Islands, the Soviet sub ex- ploded, possibly as a result of improper venting procedure. It quickly went to the bottom, three miles deep, with all hands. The U.S. Navy, through its vari- ous supersecret listening devices, de- tected and recorded the explosion. Uncoded message§ From March until May in 1968, the Soviets made numerous attempts to locate their missing submarine. They sent out trawlers, a submarine tender, and from time to time called in plain, DAVID PACKARD WILLIAM COLBY HOWARD HUGHES Pushed the project His ship—maybe Secret or leak? back to its recordings, computed the ship would support and then have at- various coordinates and by superb tached to it a large, clawlike device that analysis determined where the Soviet would be lowered to the ocean bottom, submarine lay on the ocean's bottom. entwine itself around the submarine, It then sent down sophisticated and draw it up via one single pipeline photographic equipment which took into the ship itself. photos of the Soviet sub. A report in- The cost would be approximately cluding the photos was sent to David $350 million. On July 4, 1974, the Hughes Glomar Packard, then Deputy Secretary of De- Explorer with a crew of 172 and its fense under Melvin Laird. accompanying barge arrived over the Packard was interested in what might recovery site in the Pacific. The recov- be derived from the recovery of the ery attempt was started one month sub. Intelligence experts were brought later on Aug. 4. It took almost four days in for their professional opinions. They to lower the pipe at the rate of seven were ecstatic at the possibility of get- feet an hour to the sub, site. The pipe ting their hands on a Soviet sub with its claw weighed 6 million pounds. Guided coding devices, its torpedoes, its guid- by computer, its eight subsidiary claws ance system, and all the remainder of grabbed the Soviet sub midship, fore, its gear. and aft and began to raise it. The intelligence analysis was pre- From a depth of 16,000 feet, it raised sented to the 40 Committee, which re- the sub 7000 feet. Then the submarine views and approves intelligence proj- itself fractured, broke some of the ects, and which voted to "go," and of claws, and two-thirds of it sank back to course to Richard Nixon, then Presi- the ocean bottom. dent, who gave the final go-ahead. The one-third of the sub that was The Central Intelligence Agency un- salvaged was drawn up into the well of der Richard Helms was assigned the the ship. It was carefully examined. responsibility of secretly recovering the From five to seven Soviet bodies, some Soviet submarine, no small assignment. skeletonized, were found. Decides on Hughes A burial ceremony was conducted in Russian and in English by a U.S. Navy Helms decided after much consulta- captain in full uniform. The Soviet na- tion with his technological experts that tional anthem was played. The Ameri- the Hughes Tool Co., owned by How- can national anthem was played: The ard Hughes, was the private company burial ceremony—there was one com- best qualified to undertake the job.
Recommended publications
  • Princeton Diplomatic Invitational 2020
    Top Secret // ORCON // JENNIFER Princeton Diplomatic Invitational 2020 Project Azorian Chairs: Kris Hristov & Scott Overbey Crisis Director: Gabriel Peña 1 Top Secret // ORCON // JENNIFER Top Secret // ORCON // JENNIFER CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... 2 LETTERS FROM THE STAFF ......................................................................................... 3 COMMITTEE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 5 24 hour format .................................................................................................................... 6 Committee Sessions 1&2 ................................................................................................... 6 Committee Session 3 through 6 ........................................................................................ 6 CURRENT STATUS ............................................................................................................ 7 A Brief Summary of Nuclear Weapons ........................................................................... 7 MAD About You: Nuclear Tactics .................................................................................. 9 Rocketmen: Delivery Systems ......................................................................................... 11 The Red Banner Fleet: The Soviet Nuclear Navy ........................................................ 12 K-129
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Dark Side of Camelot, the Ebook
    DARK SIDE OF CAMELOT, THE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Seymour M. Hersh | 528 pages | 01 Sep 1998 | Little, Brown & Company | 9780316360678 | English | New York, United States Dark Side of Camelot, the PDF Book Time for the Grab Bag! Hersh asked me a year or two ago if I'd learned anything new; when I told him that a former C. That said, I did not like this book. Does anyone still think John F. A hero. Democracy Now. Hersh has accused the Obama administration of lying about the events surrounding the death of Osama bin Laden and disputed the claim that the Assad regime used chemical weapons on civilians in the Syrian Civil War. Basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys, children, in cases that have been recorded, the boys were sodomized, with the cameras rolling, and the worst above all of them is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking. No trivia or quizzes yet. Some of Hersh's speeches concerning the Iraq War have described violent incidents involving U. Archived from the original PDF on March 26, Friend Reviews. Retrieved September 27, Retrieved May 16, To widen my studies I also include prominent biographies and many other Kennedy tomes. Nothing in ''The Dark Side of Camelot'' gives off even a whiff of the dead-fish aroma of the trust fund for Marilyn's Mom, but Kennedy loyalists, joined by others who just don't want to know, are using Hersh's terrible misstep to dismiss what he has dug up as trifling gossip and unsupported hearsay.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mechanically Marvelous Sea Saga: Plumbing the Depths of Cold War Paranoia Jack Mcguinn, Senior Editor
    addendum A Mechanically Marvelous Sea Saga: Plumbing the Depths of Cold War Paranoia Jack McGuinn, Senior Editor In the summer of 1974, long before Argo, there was “AZORIAN” — the code name for a CIA gambit to recover cargo entombed in a sunk- en Soviet submarine — the K-129 — from the bottom of the Pacific Ocean. The challenge: exhume — intact — a 2,000-ton submarine and its suspicious cargo from 17,000 feet of water. HowardUndated Robard Hughes Jr. photo of a young Howard Hughes — The Soviet sub had met its end (no one ($3.7 billion in 2013 dollars),” but none entrepreneur, inventor, movie producer — whose claims to know how, and the Russians of it came out of Hughes’ pocket. Jimmy Stewart-like weren’t talking) in 1968, all hands lost, Designated by ASME in 2006 as “a appearance here belies some 1,560 nautical miles northwest of historical mechanical engineering land- the truly bizarre enigma he would later become. Hawaii. After a Soviet-led, unsuccessful mark,” the ship had an array of mechani- search for the K-129, the U.S. undertook cal and electromechanical systems with one of its own and, by the use of gath- heavy-duty applications requiring robust But now, the bad news: After a num- ered sophisticated acoustic data, located gear boxes; gear drives; linear motion ber of attempts, the ship’s “custom claw” the vessel. rack-and-pinion systems; and precision managed to sustain a firm grip on the What made this noteworthy was that teleprint (planetary, sun, open) gears. submarine, but at about 9,000 feet the U-boat was armed with nuclear mis- One standout was the Glomar’s roughly two-thirds of the (forward) hull siles.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Watches the Watchmen? the Conflict Between National Security and Freedom of the Press
    WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO I see powerful echoes of what I personally experienced as Director of NSA and CIA. I only wish I had access to this fully developed intellectual framework and the courses of action it suggests while still in government. —General Michael V. Hayden (retired) Former Director of the CIA Director of the NSA e problem of secrecy is double edged and places key institutions and values of our democracy into collision. On the one hand, our country operates under a broad consensus that secrecy is antithetical to democratic rule and can encourage a variety of political deformations. But the obvious pitfalls are not the end of the story. A long list of abuses notwithstanding, secrecy, like openness, remains an essential prerequisite of self-governance. Ross’s study is a welcome and timely addition to the small body of literature examining this important subject. —Gabriel Schoenfeld Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Author of Necessary Secrets: National Security, the Media, and the Rule of Law (W.W. Norton, May 2010). ? ? The topic of unauthorized disclosures continues to receive significant attention at the highest levels of government. In his book, Mr. Ross does an excellent job identifying the categories of harm to the intelligence community associated NI PRESS ROSS GARY with these disclosures. A detailed framework for addressing the issue is also proposed. This book is a must read for those concerned about the implications of unauthorized disclosures to U.S. national security. —William A. Parquette Foreign Denial and Deception Committee National Intelligence Council Gary Ross has pulled together in this splendid book all the raw material needed to spark a fresh discussion between the government and the media on how to function under our unique system of government in this ever-evolving information-rich environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report: National Register of Historic Places/California Register of Historical Resources Evaluation for The
    Prepared for: FINAL REPORT: NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES/CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION FOR THE POINT SUR NAVFAC, POINT SUR Central Coast Lighthouse Keepers STATE HISTORIC PARK, CALIFORNIA P.O. Box 223014 Carmel, CA 93922 And Monterey District 2211 Garden Road Monterey, CA 93940 Prepared by: P.O. Box 721 Pacific Grove, California 93950 April 2013 Point Sur NAVFAC Final National/California Register Evaluation PAST Consultants, LLC April 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 Project Description..................................................................................................... 4 Project Team .............................................................................................................. 5 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................ 5 Methodology and Research Materials ...................................................................... 6 Previous Evaluations and Correspondence ............................................................... 8 Federal Guidelines for the Documentation and Historical Evaluation of Cold War Properties..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log, 2010-2016
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log, 2010-2016 Requested date: 24-October-2016 Released date: 21-November-2016 Posted date: 12-December-2016 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, D.C. 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Central Intelligence Agency Washington. D.C. 20505 21 November 2016 Reference: F-2017-00161 This is a final response to your 24 October 2016 Freedom of Information Act request for copies of the Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) Log maintained by the Central Intelligence Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implausibility of Secrecy, 65 Hastings L.J
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2-1-2014 The mplI ausibility of Secrecy Mark Fenster University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Administrative Law Commons, National Security Commons, and the Politics Commons Recommended Citation Mark Fenster, The Implausibility of Secrecy, 65 Hastings L.J. 309 (2014), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/347 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fenster_21 (M. Stevens) (Do Not Delete) 1/29/2014 6:39 PM Articles The Implausibility of Secrecy Mark Fenster Government secrecy frequently fails. Despite the executive branch’s obsessive hoarding of certain kinds of documents and its constitutional authority to do so, recent high-profile events—among them the WikiLeaks episode, the Obama administration’s infamous leak prosecutions, and the widespread disclosure by high-level officials of flattering confidential information to sympathetic reporters—undercut the image of a state that can classify and control its information. The effort to control government information requires human, bureaucratic, technological, and textual mechanisms that regularly founder or collapse in an administrative state, sometimes immediately and sometimes after an interval. Leaks, mistakes, and open sources all constitute paths out of the government’s informational clutches.
    [Show full text]
  • Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA
    Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Online Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship January 2016 Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA Chris Collins Eastern Kentucky University Follow this and additional works at: https://encompass.eku.edu/etd Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Collins, Chris, "Nixon's Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA" (2016). Online Theses and Dissertations. 352. https://encompass.eku.edu/etd/352 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nixon’s Wars: Secrecy, Watergate, and the CIA By Christopher M. Collins Bachelor of Arts Eastern Kentucky University Richmond, Kentucky 2011 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Eastern Kentucky University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December, 2016 Copyright © Christopher M. Collins, 2016 All rights reserved ii Acknowledgments I could not have completed this thesis without the support and generosity of many remarkable people. First, I am grateful to the entire EKU history department for creating such a wonderful environment in which to work. It has truly been a great experience. I am thankful to the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Robert Weise, Dr. Carolyn Dupont, and especially Dr. Thomas Appleton, who has been a true friend and mentor to me, and whose kind words and confidence in my work has been a tremendous source of encouragement, without which I would not have made it this far.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Azorian Coordinates: 40.1°N 179.9°E from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    [1] Project Azorian Coordinates: 40.1°N 179.9°E From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "Azorian" (erroneously called "Jennifer" by the press after its Top Project Azorian Secret Security Compartment)[2] was the code name for a U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) project to recover the sunken Soviet submarine K-129 from the Pacific Ocean floor in the summer of 1974, using the purpose-built ship Hughes Glomar Explorer.[3] The 1968 sinking of the K-129 occurred approximately 1,560 nautical miles (2,890 km) northwest The Hughes Glomar Explorer of Hawaii.[4] Project Azorian was Date 1974 one of the most complex, Location Pacific Ocean expensive, and secretive intelligence operations of the Cold Participants CIA, Soviet Navy, U.S. Navy War at a cost of about $800 million Outcome Successful recovery of a ($3.8 billion in 2015 dollars). portion of Soviet submarine K-129 In addition to designing the high tech recovery ship and its unique lifting cradle, the U.S. used concepts developed with Global Marine (see Project Mohole) that utilized their precision stability equipment to keep the ship nearly stationary above the target (and do this while lowering nearly three miles of pipe). They worked with scientists to develop methods for preserving paper that had been underwater for years in hopes of being able to recover and read the submarine's codebooks. The exact reasons why this project was undertaken are unknown, but likely reasons included the recovery of an intact nuclear missile (R-21, also known as NATO SS-N-5-SERB), and cryptological documents and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report
    The National Security Archive The George Washington University Phone: 202/994-7000 Gelman Library, Suite 701 Fax: 202/994-7005 2130 H Street, N.W. www. nsarchive.org Washington, D.C. 20037 [email protected] Annual Report for 2010 The following statistics provide a performance index of the Archive‘s work in 2010: Freedom of Information and declassification requests filed – 1,482 Freedom of Information and declassification appeals filed – 219 Pages of U.S. government documents released as the result of Archive requests – 70,759 including such newsmaking revelations as the Taliban‘s use of Pakistani tribal areas to regroup after the 2001 U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, leading directly to their resurgence in 2005; the Colombian military‘s execution of guerrilla prisoners and the Palace of Justice cafeteria staff during the 1985 hostage tragedy in Bogota; the CIA‘s coverup of the limited success of the 1974 Glomar Explorer attempt to raise a sunken Soviet submarine; President Nixon‘s consideration of nuclear attacks against North Korea in 1969; President Clinton‘s 1999 correspondence with Iranian president Khatami about the Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia. Pages of declassified documents delivered to publisher – 25,092 in two reference collections: Colombia and the United States: Political Violence, Narcotics, and Human Rights, 1948-2010; and The United States and the Two Koreas (1969-2000). Declassified documents delivered to truth commissions and human rights investigators – 21,560 documents to the Museum of Memory and Human Rights in Santiago, Chile as part of its permanent commemoration of human rights violations committed during the Pinochet dictatorship; 3,360 documents to Uruguay‘s Universidad de la Republica for use by researchers; 200 documents to Argentina‘s Federal Oral Criminal Tribunal No.
    [Show full text]
  • Glomar” Is Such an Apt Name for Preemptive Denial of FOIA Claims1
    Case 1:18-cv-02048-TSC Document 18-3 Filed 02/28/19 Page 1 of 2 Exhibit B 1 Why “Glomar” is such an apt name for preemptive denial of FOIA claims1 The invocation of a so-called Glomar response to Freedom of Information Act requests, though usually inappropriate, is oddly symbolic. The USNS Hughes Glomar Explorer was a ship built in 1971 under CIA’s Project Azorian to recover the Soviet submarine K-129 which sank in 1968. The CIA spent $1.68 billion ($10.63 billion in current value) in a no-bid contract to build the massive, sole- purpose ship. Glomar Explorer’s cover story was that it would “extract manganese nodules” from the ocean floor. But the nautical boondoggle ultimately failed. During an attempt to winch the K-129 to the surface, the submarine broke up, and the most-sought items such as codebooks and nuclear missiles were lost. The vessel was subsequently reflagged the GSF Explorer and roamed the seas like an albatross, searching for a buyer and a new purpose. The massive sums of taxpayer dollars that paid to build and sail the vessel were never recouped and in 2015 it was announced the ship would be sold for scrap. Ever since “boilerplate” refusals to properly respond to public interest FOIA requests about publicly known programs became known as “Glomar” responses. Essential details of Project Azorian were ultimately disclosed in the news media, starting with reporter Jack Anderson in the mid-1970's who claimed, "Navy experts have told us that the sunken sub contains no real secrets and that the project, therefore, is a waste of the taxpayers’ money."2 1 Excerpt from ECF 13-1, FOIA Case 1:15-cv-01431-TSC, pages 2-3 2 Robarge, David (March 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Project Azorian
    doi:10.3723/ut.30.055 International Journal of the Society for Underwater Technology, Vol 30, No 1, p 55–56, 2011 Project Azorian: For the United States there ‘special operations’ nuclear sub- was the opportunity to discover marine USS Halibut towing prim- Book Review The CIA and the first-hand more about Soviet itive underwater cameras in the nuclear warhead and missile tech- deep ocean, pictures were Raising of the nology and to obtain vital code obtained which showed that at books and cryptographic devices. least one of the K-129 ’s R-21 K-129 In addition, the United States nuclear-tipped missiles remained had serious concerns that K-129 in place. Norman Polmar and could have been a ‘rogue’ sub- The United States intelligence Michael White marine that had attempted an community was able (until later unauthorised missile launch on compromised by spies) to con- Published by Naval Institute the Hawaiian islands. The only ceal its discovery from the Soviets Press, Annapolis, Maryland way to know for sure would be to and commission the construction raise part, or all, of the wreck of of a supposed ‘seabed mining’ Hardback edition, 2010 the K-129 from some 5000m ship, the Glomar Explorer, with help ISBN 978 1 59114 690 2 depth – in an era before the pro- from Howard Hughes. The 238 pages including Annexes duction of deep-ocean remotely Glomar Explorer was equipped operated vehicles (ROV), or with a giant claw intended to high-resolution seafloor mapping scoop the remains of the K-129 When I give talks to the general systems.
    [Show full text]