University of Alberta Genetic Studies of North American Wapiti

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of Alberta Genetic Studies of North American Wapiti University of Alberta Genetic Studies of North American Wapiti Subspecies Renee Otti Polziehn 0 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Depatment of Biological Sciences Edmonton, Alberta Fall 2000 NationaI Library Bibliothèque nationale I*I of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your lF& Votre reference Our fiie Narre reference The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sel1 reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la fome de rnicrofiche/filrn, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenvise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abstract Many species have seen changes to their classification since molecular information was made available. In this study, both mitochondnal (control region) and nuclear (microsatellite) loci were employed to support the divisions among subspecies of North Amencan wapiti (Cerwrts elaplzris ssp). The genetic markers were chosen on the basis that their higher rate of mutation would be needed to detect diversity among these highly related organisms. To put the observed genetic diversity arnong North American wapiti into perspective, the genetic differentiation was cornpared at a population, subspecies, and species leveI. Overall, North Amencan wapiti populations express IittIe genetic variation, however isolated populations such as the Tule and Roosevelt wapiti were differentiated at both nuclear and mitochondrial markers. In contrast, the Rocky Mountain and Manitoban wapiti did not receive support for their subspecies designation from either set of markers. The translocation and migration of anirnals likely enhanced the similarity of genotypes among the Rocky Mountain and Manitoban wapiti. Their similar distribution of microsatellite genotypes and mitochondrial haplotypes suggests the separation among North American subspecies was recent. When the cornparison of mitochondrial DNA was extended to include Asian wapiti and European red deer, a division of haplotypes was detected along the Gobi Desert and Hirnalayan Mountains. The division of mitochondrial haplotypes corroborates the classification that recognized red deer as Cervrcs elaphus and wapiti as C. canadensis. Acknowledgements First and foremost, 1need to thank my supervisor, Curtis Strobeck for providing me with the opportunity to fulfill my goals to cornplete a doctoral thesis. I am gateful for his openness to explore new techniques and to ask new questions. None of this work would have been possible without the help of many people who collected sarnples. Therefore 1 need to thank the numerous anonymous park wardens frorn Elk Island, Banff, Jasper, Kootenay, Riding Mountain and Yoho National Parks for sending samples to the repository at the University of Alberta. Additional samples from North Amenca animals were provided by Didi Hawk (Wyoming Fish and Wildlife), Frank Mallory (Laurentian University), Joe Ham (Carnbrian College), Bob McClymont (Alberta Fish & Wildlife), Tom Packer (Alberta Fish & Wildlife) and Steven Fain (Forensic Laboratory of the United States Fish and Wildlife). Cornparisons with Asian subspecies would not have been possible without the help of Yan Lu (Beijing Zoo), Jianjun Peng (Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China), Yegus Cheng, Jon Winters (Purdue University), Ray Ference (Elk Valley Processors), Carmi Penny and staff of the San Diego Zoo. Funding for this research was supplied by a service contract with Parks Canada and NSERC grant. 1 wouId Iike to thank Nusha Keyghobadi, Michael Proctor, Greg Wilson, Corey Davis, Ken Zitlau, and Chris KyIe, who have helped me with the various revisions of this thesis, and hopefully it is service that 1may reciprocate. 1 would also like to thank my examiners and cornmittee members, Andrew Beckenbach, Bob Hudson, Sean Graham, and Allan Good for their final comments. Without the contributions of John Coffin, David Paetkau, and Isabelle Delisle, 1am sure my work in lab would also have gone much slower. Finally, 1 am especially grateful to Roger Marchand and my family for their support and to rny colleges that have made me laugh. Table of Contents 1 . General Introduction ....................................................................... 1 Defining a species and subspecies ............................................... 1 Genetics in general ..................................................................3 Information gained from mitochondnal DNA .............................. -4 Wapiti as the species of interest .............................. .. .................. 5 Taxonomy of Cemus elaplzus ................................................... 6 Genetic cornparisons among Centus elaphus ................................. -7 Objectives of project .............................................................. 8 Gerzetic variation within szlbspecies ..................................... 8 Genetic variation anzong subspecies ..................................... 9 References .......................................................................... 9 2. Phylogenetic Status of North American Wapiti Subspecies (Cervus elaphts spp) .................................................................. 13 Introduction ........................................................................ 13 Materials and Methods ............................................................ 18 Collection ................................................................... 18 Isolntiorz arzd ar?zpZij7catiorr (polyiirerase clzain reaction) ............ 19 Phylogerzetic analysis ...................................................... 20 Divergence ........ .. ........................................................ 20 Results .............................................................................. 20 Discussion ......................................................................... 28 References ........................................................................ -31 3 . Microsatellite analysis of North American wapiti (Cervrts elaplrrcs) populations ........................................................ 34 Introduction ........................................................................ 34 Materials and Methods ............................................................ 38 Sanzple collecrio~z.......................................................... 38 A ~~iplzficarioizof nzicrosarellite loci ...................................... 3 8 Statisrical rnethods ......................................................... 39 ResuIts .............................................................................. 41 Measru-es of genetic divers@ ............................................ -41 Relatio~zshipsanlong popitlations ........................................ 42 Discussion ........................................................................ -47 Summary ................................................................................ lû4 Mitochondrïal and microsatellite DNA ........................................ 104 Classification ..................................................................... 105 Pop~datioizlevel ............................................................ 105 Sttbspecies level ........................................................... 106 Species levez ................................................................ 107 Future ............................................................................. -108 References ........................................................................ -109 6. Addendum .Comparative sequences from the SRY gene from North American ungulates .......................................................... 111 Introduction ....................................................................... 111 Materials and Methods ........................................................... 112 Results ............................................................................ -113 Discussion ........................................................................ 116 References ......................................................................... 117 List of Tables Table 2.1 . Primers employed in the sequencing of the control region .................... 19 Table 2.2 . Control region sequences .......................................................... 21 Table 2.3 . Nucleotide substitutions in the control region .................................. 23 Table 2.4 . Divergence of mtDNA d-loop sequences ........................................ 25 Table 3- 1. Measures of genetic diversity among wapiti populations .................... 41 Table 3.2 . Genetic distances among wapiti populations .................................. 43 Table 3.3 . The numbers
Recommended publications
  • Sharing the Range: Managing Wildlife Impacts to Livestock Production in California Coast Range Working Landscapes Author Sheri Spiegal Ph.D
    Title Sharing the range: managing wildlife impacts to livestock production in California Coast Range working landscapes Author Sheri Spiegal Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley Abstract Livestock and wildlife share grazed rangelands, and in many cases, they get along fine. Some wildlife species, however, can negatively impact livestock operations by killing livestock, consuming forage, damaging facilities, and transmitting disease. Ranchers have traditionally resorted to lethal wildlife control to reduce these impacts, yet this has been controversial as many people do not want any animal to be harmed for any reason. In addition, some policies designed to protect wildlife may be perceived by ranchers as doing so at the expense of livestock production. It is important to find ways to minimize the conflicts between livestock production and wildlife protection in order to maintain sustainable working landscapes that enjoy broad support among livestock producers and conservationists. Interviews of people connected with livestock production in and adjacent to the California Coast Ranges, from Mendocino County south to Monterey County, and a review of scientific literature were used to identify the main problems ranchers experience with wildlife and the impact reduction strategies they use that are broadly acceptable to the public. Interviewees most commonly described grievances related to the mountain lion, tule elk, coyote, California ground squirrel, and feral pig. For each of these species, a history of popular opinion in California is summarized, ecological and biological characteristics are briefly reviewed, impacts to livestock operations are described, dimensions of lethal control are outlined, and strategies used to reduce impacts with minimal controversy are assessed for their effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks: Time to Burn (For Ecological Integrity’S Sake)
    National Parks: Time to Burn (for Ecological Integrity’s Sake) By Andrea Johancsik, AWA Conservation Specialist tanding at the peak of the east end nities. In Alberta we saw the subsequent National Park this way in 1915. Eight de- of Rundle last month, my friends creation of Waterton Lakes National Park cades later, then- graduate student Jeanine S and I marveled at the sunny, spring in 1895, Elk Island National Park in 1906, Rhemtulla, Dr. Eric Higgs, and other mem- day we were fortunate enough to witness Jasper National Park in 1907, and Wood bers of the Mountain Legacy project pains- from 2,530m high. The hike gives vistas of Buffalo National Park in 1922. The high- takingly retook all 735 of Bridgland’s Jasper remote mountain peaks and forested slopes, ly popular and newly accessible mountain photos. They wanted to compare how the as well as the highly visible town of Can- parks became dominated by tourism and vegetation on the landscape had changed, more and the Spray Lakes dam. However, commercial development, roads, and re- if it had changed at all, over nearly a cen- arguably one of the biggest human-caused moval of keystone species like the plains tury. Their study found that vegetation has changes in the mountain national parks is bison. Many of the 3.6 million visitors who become less diverse and is now dominated much less obvious. Decades of fire suppres- passed through Banff National Park last year by closed-canopy coniferous forests; in 1915 sion have changed the landscape in a dra- probably didn’t realize they were looking at the landscape consisted of open coniferous matic way; had we been at the summit 80 a drastically different landscape from the one forest, grasslands, young forests and some years ago our view likely would have been of a century ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Linear Developments on Wildlife
    Bibliography Rec# 5. LeBlanc, R. 1991. The aversive conditioning of a roadside habituated grizzly bear within Banff Park: progress report 1991. 6 pp. road impacts/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ Banff National Park/ aversive conditions/ Icefields Parkway. Rec# 10. Forman, R.T.T. 1983. Corridors in a landscape: their ecological structure and function. Ekologia 2 (4):375-87. corridors/ landscape/ width. Rec# 11. McLellan, B.N. 1989. Dymanics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. III Natality and rate of increase. Can. J. Zool. Vol. 67 :1865-1868. reproductive rate/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ British Columbia/ gas exploration/ timber harvest. Rec# 14. McLellan, B.N. 1989. Dynamics of a grizzly bear population during a period of industrial resource extraction. II.Mortality rates and causes of death. Can. J. Zool. Vol. 67 :1861-1864. British Columbia/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos/ mortality rate/ hunting/ outdoor recreation/ gas exploration/ timber harvest. Rec# 15. Miller, S.D., Schoen, J. 1993. The Brown Bear in Alaska . brown bear/ grizzly bear/ Ursus arctos middendorfi/ Ursus arctos horribilis/ population density/ distribution/ legal status/ human-bear interactions/ management/ education. Rec# 16. Archibald, W.R., Ellis, R., Hamilton, A.N. 1987. Responses of grizzly bears to logging truck traffic in the Kimsquit River valley, British Columbia. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage. 7:251-7. grizzly bear/ Ursus / arctos/ roads/ traffic/ logging/ displacement/ disturbance/ carnivore/ BC/ individual disruption / habitat displacement / habitat disruption / social / filter-barrier. Rec# 20. Kasworm, W.F., Manley, T.L. 1990. Road and trail influences on grizzly bears and black bears in northwest Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclassifying the Wood Bison
    6734 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 8, 2011 / Proposed Rules input in person, by mail, e-mail, or January 13, 2011. generally means that we will post any phone at any time during the Peter J. Probasco, personal information you provide us rulemaking process. Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board. (see the Public Comments section below January 13, 2011. for more information). Executive Order 13211 Steve Kessler, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: This Executive Order requires Subsistence Program Leader, USDA–Forest Marilyn Myers at U.S. Fish and Wildlife agencies to prepare Statements of Service. Service, Fisheries and Ecological Energy Effects when undertaking certain [FR Doc. 2011–2679 Filed 2–7–11; 8:45 am] Services, 1011 E. Tudor Road, actions. However, this proposed rule is BILLING CODE 3410–11–P; 4310–55–P Anchorage, Alaska 99503, or telephone not a significant regulatory action under 907–786–3559 or by facsimile at (907) E.O. 13211, affecting energy supply, 786–3848. If you use a distribution, or use, and no Statement of DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Energy Effects is required. Fish and Wildlife Service Information Relay Service (FIRS) at Drafting Information 800–877–8339. 50 CFR Part 17 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Theo Matuskowitz drafted these regulations under the guidance of Peter [Docket No. FWS–R9–IA–2008–0123; MO Public Comments 92210–1113FWDB B6] J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence We intend that any final action Management, Alaska Regional Office, RIN 1018–AI83 resulting from this proposed rule will be U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Afternoon, Please Be Advised That Elk Island National Park of Fort
    Good afternoon, Please be advised that Elk Island National Park of Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta is selling 98 PLAINS bison Calves, Yearlings and OTM Bulls by tender. Please see attached document which includes detailed information on the Plains bison for sale on behalf of Elk Island National Park (EINP). Refer to this document when preparing your tender. At the discretion of ElNP, the 98 Plains Bison have been divided into groups referred to as “Lots”. These Lots coincide with the Pens the bison are split into. Please consider placing bids on each OR all Lot(s) as desired. Any or All Lots may or may not sell to the same bidder. NOTE: Please see Animal Information Sheet for Tag #’s, Age, Gender, Weights, and “Lot #’s” the bison are offered in. The groups in each “Lot” consist of a variety of calves & yearlings (bulls & heifers), and a few “Lots” of older bulls. Total numbers for each age and each gender of Plains bison for sale include the following: - 31 – 2018 Bulls - 25 – 2018 Heifers - 18 – 2017 Bulls - 19 – 2017 Heifers - 2 – 2.5 yr Bulls - 2 – 3.5 yr Bulls - 1 – 4.5 yr Bull Viewing Dates: Monday February 25, Tuesday February 26 and Wednesday February 27 from 11:00AM – 2:00PM Alberta time, at Elk Island National Park, Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta. To arrange viewing, please contact Rob Found at 780-266-5963 (cell) or at [email protected] Please submit ONE total dollar amount for EACH LOT you are interested in. If you are interested in MULTIPLE LOTS or ALL LOTS, please submit a Bid for each Lot individually.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT on TRANSBOUNDARY CONSERVATION HOTSPOTS for the CENTRAL ASIAN MAMMALS INITIATIVE (Prepared by the Secretariat)
    CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/COP13/Inf.27 MIGRATORY 8 January 2020 SPECIES Original: English 13th MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Gandhinagar, India, 17 - 22 February 2020 Agenda Item 26.3 REPORT ON TRANSBOUNDARY CONSERVATION HOTSPOTS FOR THE CENTRAL ASIAN MAMMALS INITIATIVE (Prepared by the Secretariat) Summary: This report was developed with funding from the Government of Switzerland within the frame of the Central Asian Mammals Initiative (CAMI) (Doc. 26.3.5) to identify transboundary conservation hotspots and develop recommendations for their conservation. The report builds on existing projects, in particular, the CAMI Linear Infrastructure and Migration Atlas (see Inf.Doc.19) and focusses on the same species and geographical area. The study was discussed during the CAMI Range State Meeting held from 25-28 September 2019 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia where participants reviewed the pre-identified areas. Their comments are incorporated in this report. Participants also provided new information about important transboundary sites from Bhutan, India, Nepal and Pakistan and recommended to send the report for final review to Range States and experts. It was also recommended that the final report covers all CAMI species as adopted at COP13. This report is therefore a final draft with the last step to expand the geographical and species scope and finalize the report to be undertaken after COP13. Mapping Transboundary Conservation Hotspots for the Central Asian Mammals Initiative Photo credit: Viktor Lukarevsky Report – Draft 5 incorporating comments made during the CAMI Range States Meeting on 25-28 September 2019 in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. The report does not yet consider the Urial, Persian leopard and Gobi bear as CAMI species pending decision at the CMS COP13, as well as the proposed expansion of the geographic and species scope to include the entire CAMI region in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Primorsky Krai 165,900 Sq
    PRIMORSKY KHABAROVSK Trans- Siberian Railroad Russian Far East Amur River JAO Agzu Samarga Edinka POZHARSKY Svetlaya POZHARSKY Ulunga Verkhne Pereval Vostok Luchegorsk Krasny Yar Kuznetsovo Ignatevka Pozharskoe Maximovka Guberovo Glubinnoe CHINA Amgu !. Dalnerechensk Roshchino TERNEISKY Lazo Novopokrovka KRASNOARMEISKY Rakitnoe Velikaya Kema Tamga DALNERECHENSKY Malaya Kema Melnichnoe !. Lesozavodsk SKY LESOZAVOD Tury Rog Gornye Klyuchi Ternei Ariadnoe Kirovsky ¯ Novokachalinsk Lake lroad Dalny Kut KIROVSKY ORSKY KHANKA Rai Ilinka Plastun Khanka Gorny km DALNEG Cheremshany Dvoryanka berian PO ISKY Samarka Kamen-Rybolov Krasnorechensky 100 GRANICHNY Dalnegorsk !. Zharikovo Tr!.ans-SiSpassk-Dalny KY Koksharovka SPASSKY Kamenka KHOROLS AKOLEVS Khrustalny Pogranichny Khorol Y Yakovlevka EVSKY Rudny Rudnaya Pristan ! CH UGU CHERNIGOVSKY !Kavalerovo EROVSKY KY Lipovtsy ! Sibirtsevo Chuguevka KAVAL ! !. ANUCHINSKY Arsenev Yaroslavsky OKTYABRSKY Vesely Yar n MI Mikhailovka Pokrovka KHAILOVSKY Anuchino Olga a Mikhailovka Arkhipovka Nikolo-Lvovskoe !. OLGINSKY PARTI p USSURIISKY UssuriiskSHKO Terekhovka a ZANSKY TOVSKY Margaritovo NADEZHDINSKY Lazo J Sergeevka Uglovoe Artem ! !. ! Smolyaninovo ZOVSKY LA Valentin f Primorsky !. P! !. Bolshoi Kamen Partizansk o ! Russky Nakhodka Preobrazhenie ! . Popova ! a Kraskino KHASANSKY Poset Slavyanka e VLADIVOSTOK S Map 2.1 Zarubino Khasan Primorsky Krai 165,900 sq. km Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages By Newell and Zhou / Sources: Ministry of Natural Resources, 2002; ESRI, 2002. 110 Ⅲ THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST CHAPTER 2 Primorsky Krai PRIMORSKY Location Situated along the southeastern border of the rfe, Primorsky Krai, or Primorie, shares a common border with China in the west and Khabarovsk Krai in the north. To the east lies the Sea of Japan, which separates Primorsky from Japan by only 400 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Amur Oblast TYNDINSKY 361,900 Sq
    AMUR 196 Ⅲ THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST SAKHA Map 5.1 Ust-Nyukzha Amur Oblast TY NDINS KY 361,900 sq. km Lopcha Lapri Ust-Urkima Baikal-Amur Mainline Tynda CHITA !. ZEISKY Kirovsky Kirovsky Zeiskoe Zolotaya Gora Reservoir Takhtamygda Solovyovsk Urkan Urusha !Skovorodino KHABAROVSK Erofei Pavlovich Never SKOVO MAGDAGACHINSKY Tra ns-Siberian Railroad DIRO Taldan Mokhe NSKY Zeya .! Ignashino Ivanovka Dzhalinda Ovsyanka ! Pioner Magdagachi Beketovo Yasny Tolbuzino Yubileiny Tokur Ekimchan Tygda Inzhan Oktyabrskiy Lukachek Zlatoustovsk Koboldo Ushumun Stoiba Ivanovskoe Chernyaevo Sivaki Ogodzha Ust-Tygda Selemdzhinsk Kuznetsovo Byssa Fevralsk KY Kukhterin-Lug NS Mukhino Tu Novorossiika Norsk M DHI Chagoyan Maisky SELE Novovoskresenovka SKY N OV ! Shimanovsk Uglovoe MAZ SHIMA ANOV Novogeorgievka Y Novokievsky Uval SK EN SK Mazanovo Y SVOBODN Chernigovka !. Svobodny Margaritovka e CHINA Kostyukovka inlin SERYSHEVSKY ! Seryshevo Belogorsk ROMNENSKY rMa Bolshaya Sazanka !. Shiroky Log - Amu BELOGORSKY Pridorozhnoe BLAGOVESHCHENSKY Romny Baikal Pozdeevka Berezovka Novotroitskoe IVANOVSKY Ekaterinoslavka Y Cheugda Ivanovka Talakan BRSKY SKY P! O KTYA INSK EI BLAGOVESHCHENSK Tambovka ZavitinskIT BUR ! Bakhirevo ZAV T A M B OVSKY Muravyovka Raichikhinsk ! ! VKONSTANTINO SKY Poyarkovo Progress ARKHARINSKY Konstantinovka Arkhara ! Gribovka M LIKHAI O VSKY ¯ Kundur Innokentevka Leninskoe km A m Trans -Siberianad Railro u 100 r R i v JAO Russian Far East e r By Newell and Zhou / Sources: Ministry of Natural Resources, 2002; ESRI, 2002. Newell, J. 2004. The Russian Far East: A Reference Guide for Conservation and Development. McKinleyville, CA: Daniel & Daniel. 466 pages CHAPTER 5 Amur Oblast Location Amur Oblast, in the upper and middle Amur River basin, is 8,000 km east of Moscow by rail (or 6,500 km by air).
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Entire Fall 2013 Issue
    american fall 2013 The Long Ride The Tour DiviDe is 2,800 miles of ruggeD foresT Terrain, unforgiving weaTher anD enDurance pusheD To The limiTs, all from The saDDle of a bike. Vol 119 No 2 CONTENTS Fall 2013 Departments 2 Offshoots A word from our CEO 4 Tree Doctor Advice from tree care experts 6 Treelines Alligator juniper, longleaf pine and post-Irene reforestation in 24 44 Vermont, plus: FOREST FRONTIERS: Meet Phil Radtke, a member of the Big Tree Program’s new Measuring Guidelines Working Group. PARTNERS: Bank of America e. L Charitable Foundation partners with us for Community ReLeaf easda t in five cities. Plus, join our exclusive trip to Mexico to meet aron the monarchs. a y B FROM THE FIELD: American Forests staffers report on proj- ects happening in Wyoming and Tennessee and share exciting oute. Photo oute. Photo r news of an award. 38 People and Trees By Ruth Wilson Muse upon our connection to trees and the many ways they bring ivide Mountain Bike ivide Mountain d meaning into our lives. 44 Earthkeepers A WILD CROP AND BACKYARD HARVEST 16 By Jack Wax Meet the man who turns a wild crop into the nuts in your snack drawer. Features 48 Last Look By Tatiana Boyle ed Meadow Pass in Montana on the Great on the Great in Montana Pass ed Meadow 16 24 32 r The Long Ride Aspen in a Reintroducing By Bob Marr Changing Elk to the es toward es toward CL Join us on a bike ride along the y CORRECTIONS C continental divide from Canada to World Great Smoky Spring/Summer 2013, cover and “Islands By Tyler Williams in the Balance,” p.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]
  • Newell, J. 2004. the Russian Far East
    Industrial pollution in the Komsomolsky, Solnechny, and Amursky regions, and in the city of Khabarovsk and its Table 3.1 suburbs, is excessive. Atmospheric pollution has been increas- Protected areas in Khabarovsk Krai ing for decades, with large quantities of methyl mercaptan in Amursk, formaldehyde, sulfur dioxide, phenols, lead, and Type and name Size (ha) Raion Established benzopyrene in Khabarovsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur, and Zapovedniks dust prevalent in Solnechny, Urgal, Chegdomyn, Komso- molsk-on-Amur, and Khabarovsk. Dzhugdzhursky 860,000 Ayano-Maysky 1990 Between 1990 and 1999, industries in Komsomolsky and Bureinsky 359,000 Verkhne-Bureinsky 1987 Amursky Raions were the worst polluters of the Amur River. Botchinsky 267,400 Sovetsko-Gavansky 1994 High concentrations of heavy metals, copper (38–49 mpc), Bolonsky 103,600 Amursky, Nanaisky 1997 KHABAROVSK zinc (22 mpc), and chloroprene (2 mpc) were found. Indus- trial and agricultural facilities that treat 40 percent or less of Komsomolsky 61,200 Komsomolsky 1963 their wastewater (some treat none) create a water defi cit for Bolshekhekhtsirsky 44,900 Khabarovsky 1963 people and industry, despite the seeming abundance of water. The problem is exacerbated because of: Federal Zakazniks Ⅲ Pollution and low water levels in smaller rivers, particular- Badzhalsky 275,000 Solnechny 1973 ly near industrial centers (e.g., Solnechny and the Silinka River, where heavy metal levels exceed 130 mpc). Oldzhikhansky 159,700 Poliny Osipenko 1969 Ⅲ A loss of soil fertility. Tumninsky 143,100 Vaninsky 1967 Ⅲ Fires and logging, which impair the forests. Udylsky 100,400 Ulchsky 1988 Ⅲ Intensive development and quarrying of mineral resourc- Khekhtsirsky 56,000 Khabarovsky 1959 es, primarily construction materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 8 Comprehensive Report Species
    Comprehensive Report Species - Cervus elaphus Page 1 of 8 << Previous | Next >> View Glossary Cervus elaphus - Linnaeus, 1758 Elk Taxonomic Status: Accepted Related ITIS Name(s): Cervus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758 (TSN 180695) French Common Names: wapiti Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102257 Element Code: AMALC01010 Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Vertebrates - Mammals - Other Mammals © Larry Master Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Animalia Craniata Mammalia Artiodactyla Cervidae Cervus Genus Size: C - Small genus (6-20 species) Check this box to expand all report sections: Concept Reference Concept Reference: Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. Available online at: http://www.bucknell.edu/msw3/. Concept Reference Code: B05WIL01NAUS Name Used in Concept Reference: Cervus elaphus Taxonomic Comments: In recent decades, most authors have included Cervus canadensis in C. elaphus; i.e., North American elk has been regarded as conspecific with red deer of western Eurasia. Geist (1998) recommended that C. elaphus and C. canadensis be regarded as distinct species. This is supported by patterns of mtDNA variation as reported by Randi et al. (2001). The 2003 Texas Tech checklist of North American mammals (Baker et al. 2003) adopted this change. Grubb (in Wilson and Reeder 2005) followed here included canadensis in C. elaphus. Conservation Status NatureServe Status Global Status: G5 Global Status Last Reviewed: 19Nov1996 Global Status Last Changed: 19Nov1996 Rounded Global Status: G5 - Secure Nation: United States National Status: N5 (05Sep1996) Nation: Canada National Status: N5 (06Mar2013) U.S.
    [Show full text]