Construction of a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Library from the Spikemoss Selaginella Moellendorffii: a New Resource for Plant Comparative Genomics
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Faculty Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Publications 6-14-2005 Construction of a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Library From the Spikemoss Selaginella moellendorffii: a New Resource for Plant Comparative Genomics. Wenming Wang University of Arizona, [email protected] Milos Tanurdzic [email protected] Meizhong Luo University of Arizona, [email protected] Nicholas Sisneros University of Arizona, [email protected] Hye Ran Kim University of Arizona, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/btnypubs Recommended Citation Wang, Wenming; Tanurdzic, Milos; Luo, Meizhong; Sisneros, Nicholas; Kim, Hye Ran; Weng, Jing-Ke; Kudrna, Dave; Mueller, Christopher; Arumuganathan, K; Carlson, John; Chapple, Clint; de Pamphilis, Claude; Mandoli, Dina; Tomkins, Jeff; Wing, Rod A.; and Banks, Jo Ann, "Construction of a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Library From the Spikemoss Selaginella moellendorffii: a New Resource for Plant Comparative Genomics." (2005). Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Faculty Publications. Paper 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-5-10 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. Authors Wenming Wang, Milos Tanurdzic, Meizhong Luo, Nicholas Sisneros, Hye Ran Kim, Jing-Ke Weng, Dave Kudrna, Christopher Mueller, K Arumuganathan, John Carlson, Clint Chapple, Claude de Pamphilis, Dina Mandoli, Jeff omkT ins, Rod A. Wing, and Jo Ann Banks This article is available at Purdue e-Pubs: http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/btnypubs/17 BMC Plant Biology BioMed Central Database Open Access Construction of a bacterial artificial chromosome library from the spikemoss Selaginella moellendorffii: a new resource for plant comparative genomics Wenming Wang1,9, Milos Tanurdzic2,8, Meizhong Luo1, Nicholas Sisneros1, Hye Ran Kim1, Jing-Ke Weng3, Dave Kudrna1, Christopher Mueller1, K Arumuganathan4, John Carlson5, Clint Chapple3, Claude de Pamphilis5, Dina Mandoli6, Jeff Tomkins7, Rod A Wing1 and Jo Ann Banks*2 Address: 1Arizona Genomics Institute, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, 2Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA, 3Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA, 4Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, 1201 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, USA, 5Department of Biology and Huck Institutes of Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, 6Department of Biology and Center for Developmental Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA, 7Department of Genetics, Biochemistry and Life Science Studies, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA, 8Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA and 9Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, College Park, MD 20742, USA Email: Wenming Wang - [email protected]; Milos Tanurdzic - [email protected]; Meizhong Luo - [email protected]; Nicholas Sisneros - [email protected]; Hye Ran Kim - [email protected]; Jing-Ke Weng - [email protected]; Dave Kudrna - [email protected]; Christopher Mueller - [email protected]; K Arumuganathan - [email protected]; John Carlson - [email protected]; Clint Chapple - [email protected]; Claude de Pamphilis - [email protected]; Dina Mandoli - [email protected]; Jeff Tomkins - [email protected]; Rod A Wing - [email protected]; Jo Ann Banks* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 14 June 2005 Received: 06 January 2005 Accepted: 14 June 2005 BMC Plant Biology 2005, 5:10 doi:10.1186/1471-2229-5-10 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/5/10 © 2005 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: The lycophytes are an ancient lineage of vascular plants that diverged from the seed plant lineage about 400 Myr ago. Although the lycophytes occupy an important phylogenetic position for understanding the evolution of plants and their genomes, no genomic resources exist for this group of plants. Results: Here we describe the construction of a large-insert bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library from the lycophyte Selaginella moellendorffii. Based on cell flow cytometry, this species has the smallest genome size among the different lycophytes tested, including Huperzia lucidula, Diphaiastrum digita, Isoetes engelmanii and S. kraussiana. The arrayed BAC library consists of 9126 clones; the average insert size is estimated to be 122 kb. Inserts of chloroplast origin account for 2.3% of the clones. The BAC library contains an estimated ten genome-equivalents based on DNA hybridizations using five single-copy and two duplicated S. moellendorffii genes as probes. Conclusion: The S. moellenforffii BAC library, the first to be constructed from a lycophyte, will be useful to the scientific community as a resource for comparative plant genomics and evolution. Page 1 of 8 (page number not for citation purposes) BMC Plant Biology 2005, 5:10 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/5/10 Background important features in plants originated and diversified at The lycophytes (class Lycopsida) are an ancient group of a genetic level. To help fill this gap, the genome sizes of vascular plants that dominated the earth's flora during the several species of lycophytes were determined by cell flow Carboniferous period. The three orders of lycophytes that cytometry in order to identify a lycophyte with a relatively remain from this period include the homosporous Lyco- small genome. Of those surveyed, the spikemoss Selag- podiales, the heterosporous Selaginellales and the heter- inella moellendorffii was found to have the smallest, with a osporous Isoetales. All of these plants are distinguishable nuclear genome size less than 127 Mbp. Here we describe from ferns and flowering plants by the presence of micro- the construction and characterization of a large insert BAC phylls (as opposed to euphylls), the absence of leaf gaps library for this species. and the absence of lateral roots. In common with ferns but not flowering plants, all lycophytes produce free-liv- Results and discussion ing spores, an independent gametophyte generation and Genome size estimates non-integumented sporangia. Based upon the fossil The approximate genome sizes of several lycophyte spe- record, the lycophytes are thought to have emerged during cies were determined by cell flow cytometry using as an the early Devonian about 400 Myr ago prior to the evolu- internal standard the nuclei of other plants or cells with tion of leaves and roots in vascular plants [1,2]. Based on genomes of known sizes (Table 1). The homosporous recent DNA-based phylogenetic analyses, the Lycopsida Huperzia lucidula and Diphaiastrum digita (Lycopodiales) clade is monophyletic and sister to the fern/seed plant, or have the largest genomes of those surveyed, estimated to euphyllophyte, clade [3]. As representatives of the earliest be 5585 and 2670 Mbp/1C, respectively. Isoetes engelmanii and still-surviving vascular plant lineage, the lycophytes (Isoetales), a heterosporous lycophyte, has a genome size are an important group of plants for providing insights of 1710 Mbp/1C. The heterosporous Selaginella moellen- into the early evolution of land plants. dorffii (Selaginellales) has the smallest genome of those surveyed, between 88 and 127 Mbp/1C. The three esti- While genomic resources are available for many species of mates of S. moellendorffii genome size (Table 1) vary flowering plants, including the sequences of the Arabidop- depending on species used as the internal standard. We sis thaliana [4], rice [5,6] and poplar [7] genomes, very few also confirmed that the genome size of S. moellendorffii is resources exist for plants other than angiosperms. A draft smaller than that of S. kraussiana (Table 1), which was pre- genome sequence is available for Chlamydomonas rein- viously reported to have a genome size ranging from hardtii [8], a chlorophytic green alga that is a distant rela- 0.32–0.72 pg/2C, or 157–320 Mbp/1C [10]. The decision tive of the charophytic algal group that gave rise to land to construct a BAC library from the heterosporous S. moe- plants [9]. The huge phylogenetic gap between the charac- llendorffii was largely based on its having the smallest terized genomes of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and flower- genome size of all lycophyte accessions examined here or ing plants greatly limits our ability to study how reported previously. Table 1: Results of cell flow cytometry to determine the nuclear genome sizes of some lycophytes. Sample species Internal standard (pg/2C) DNA content of sample (pg/2C); DNA content of sample species n1; SD (Mbp/1C)2 Huperzia lucidula Chick red blood cells (2.333) 11.40; 4; 0.036 5586 Diphaiastrum digita Chick red blood cells (2.333) 5.45; 4; 0.017 2670 Isoetes engelmanii Glycine max leaf (2.254) 3.49; 4; 0.005 1710 Selaginella moellendorffii Arabidopsis thaliana flower buds (0.365) 0.18; 8; 0.009 88 Oryza sativa leaf (1.06) 0.25; 4; 0.25 123 Glycine max leaf (2.254) 0.26; 4; 0.006 127 Selaginella kraussiana Oryza sativa leaf (1.06) 0.43; 4; 0.006 211 Glycine max leaf (2.254) 0.49; 4; 0.003 240 1nuclei from sample and internal standard source plants or cells were prepared; n represents the number of times each nuclei preparation was sampled by cell flow cytometry. 2assumes that 1 pg = 980 Mbp 3Galbraith et al. [20] 4Bennett and Leitch [21] 5Bennett et al. [22] 6Bennett et al. [23] Page 2 of 8 (page number not for citation purposes) BMC Plant Biology 2005, 5:10 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2229/5/10 NotFigure I digests 1 of BAC DNA isolated from 43 random BAC clones from the S.