DOCSLIB.ORG

NASA Sounding Rockets User Handbook Sounding Rockets Program Office Sub-Orbital and Special Orbital Projects Directorate

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NASA Sounding Rockets User Handbook Sounding Rockets Program Office Sub-Orbital and Special Orbital Projects Directorate 810-HB-SRP NASA Sounding Rockets User Handbook Sounding Rockets Program Office Sub-orbital and Special Orbital Projects Directorate NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Wallops Flight Facility Wallops Island, VA 23337 July 2015 1 810-HB-SRP Preface This Handbook describes the capabilities of the Sounding Rocket program, the design and technology applications used by that program, and the processes established to integrate the customer (principal investigator/program user/scientist/experimenter) into the mission team to ensure the highest probability of a successful project. Neither the United States Government nor any person acting on the behalf of the Unites States Government assumes any liability resulting from the use of information contained in this document or warrants that the use will be free from privately owned rights. The use of a company name does not imply approval or recommendation of the product to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable. 2 810-HB-SRP Preface ............................................................................................................................................. 2 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 11 List of tables ................................................................................................................................... 12 SECTION 1: The NASA Sounding Rocket Program (NSRP) ................................................................. 13 1.1 The Program: 1959 – the Present .................................................................................................. 13 1.2 NASA Organizational Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 14 1.2.1 Program Management ....................................................................................................................................... 14 1.2.2 Sounding Rocket Working Group (SRWG) ......................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Sounding Rocket Program Customer’s Role ................................................................................... 14 1.3.1 Philosophy ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 1.3.2 Payload and Instrumentation ............................................................................................................................ 15 1.4 Sounding Rocket Project Support Elements .................................................................................. 15 1.4.1 Program-Provided Support Services .................................................................................................................. 16 1.4.1.1 Flight Mission Management ..................................................................................................................... 17 1.4.1.2 Payload Analysis, Design, & Development ............................................................................................... 18 1.4.1.3 Launch Vehicle and Payload Support Systems ......................................................................................... 18 1.4.1.4 Payload Fabrication .................................................................................................................................. 18 1.4.1.5 Payload Assembly/Integration, Testing, & Evaluation ............................................................................. 19 1.4.1.6 Launch and Flight Support Operations ..................................................................................................... 19 1.4.1.7 Post-Flight Data Processing and Analysis ................................................................................................. 20 1.4.1.8 Ground and Flight Safety .......................................................................................................................... 20 SECTION 2: The Sounding Rocket Mission Lifecycle......................................................................... 22 2.1 The Mission Initiation Conference (MIC) ....................................................................................... 22 2.1.1 Project Schedule ................................................................................................................................................ 22 2.1.2 Mechanical Devices and Structural Elements .................................................................................................... 23 2.1.3 Flight Performance ............................................................................................................................................ 23 2.1.4 Instrumentation ................................................................................................................................................. 24 2.1.5 Attitude Control ................................................................................................................................................. 24 2.1.6 Navigation .......................................................................................................................................................... 24 2.1.7 Data Reduction .................................................................................................................................................. 24 2.1.8 Testing ............................................................................................................................................................... 24 2.1.9 Foreign Nationals ............................................................................................................................................... 24 2.2 Requirements Definition Phase .................................................................................................... 25 2.3 The Requirements Definition Meeting (RDM) ............................................................................... 25 2.4 Design Phase ............................................................................................................................... 25 2.5 Design Review (DR) ...................................................................................................................... 25 2.6 Payload Fabrication and Pre-Integration Testing Phase ................................................................. 26 2.7 Pre-Integration Review (PIR) ........................................................................................................ 27 3 810-HB-SRP 2.8 Integration and Testing (I&T) Phase .............................................................................................. 27 2.8.1 Payload Integration ............................................................................................................................................ 28 2.8.2 Acceptance Testing ............................................................................................................................................ 28 2.8.3 Final Checkout ................................................................................................................................................... 28 2.9 Mission Readiness Review (MRR) ................................................................................................. 28 2.10 Flight Readiness Review (FRR) ...................................................................................................... 29 2.11 Launch Operations Phase ............................................................................................................. 29 2.12 Mission Closeout Phase ................................................................................................................ 30 SECTION 3: Sounding Rocket Launch Vehicles and Performance Capabilities ................................... 32 3.1 NASA Mission Designation System ............................................................................................... 32 3.2 NASA Sounding Rockets ............................................................................................................... 32 3.2.1 Performance Characteristics .............................................................................................................................. 32 3.3 Boost Guidance System (BGS)....................................................................................................... 36 3.3.1 Background & Capabilities ................................................................................................................................. 37 Section 4: Sounding Rocket Payload Design Considerations ............................................................. 38 4.1 Payload Design ............................................................................................................................ 38 4.2 Flight Performance ....................................................................................................................... 39 4.2.1 Mechanical Loads and Vibration ........................................................................................................................ 39 4.2.2 Thermal Considerations ..................................................................................................................................... 39 4.2.3 Vacuum and Out-Gassing .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Weather Reporting -- Volume C2
    WEATHER REPORTING MESSAGES MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES МЕТЕОРОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ INFORMES METEOROLOGICOS VOLUME/TOM/VOLUMEN C2 TRANSMISSION PROGRAMMES PROGRAMMES DE TRANSMISSION ЛPOГPAMMЬI ЛEPEДY PROGRAMAS DE TRANSMISIÓN 2012 Weather y Climate y Water World Meteorological Organization Organisation météorologique mondiale Всемирная Метеорологическая Организация Organización Meteorológica Mundial WMO/OMM/BMO No. 9 WEATHER REPORTING MESSAGES MÉTÉOROLOGIQUES МЕТЕОРОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ СООБЩЕНИЯ INFORMES METEOROLOGICOS VOLUME/TOM/VOLUMEN C2 TRANSMISSION PROGRAMMES PROGRAMMES DE TRANSMISSION ЛPOГPAMMЬI ЛEPEДY PROGRAMAS DE TRANSMISIÓN 2012 Edition World Meteorological Organization Organisation météorologique mondiale Всемирная Метеорологическая Организация Organización Meteorológica Mundial WMO/OMM/BMO No. 9 COPYRIGHT © World Meteorological Organization © Organisation météorologique mondiale The right of publication in print, electronic and any other L’OMM se réserve le droit de publication en version imprimée form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts ou électronique ou sous toute autre forme et dans n’importe from WMO publications may be reproduced without quelle langue. De courts extraits des publications de l’OMM authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly peuvent être reproduits sans autorisation, pour autant que la indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, source complète soit clairement indiquée. La correspondance reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole relative au contenu rédactionnel
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports
    Commercial Space Transportation 2006 Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts: Vehicles, Technologies and Spaceports January 2006 HQ003606.INDD 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts About FAA/AST About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encour- age, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation i About FAA/AST 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. ii Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation 2006 U.S. Commercial Space Transportation Developments and Concepts Contents Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Significant 2005 Events . .4 Space Competitions . .6 Expendable Launch Vehicles . .9 Current Expendable Launch Vehicle Systems . .9 Atlas 5 - Lockheed Martin Corporation .
    [Show full text]
  • Les Fusées-Sondes De Sud-Aviation
    Les fusées-sondes de Sud-Aviation Jean-Jacques Serra Commission Histoire de la 3AF Origines : Centre national d'études des télécommunications (CNET) • Loi du 4 mai 1944, validée le 29 janvier 1945 • Demandes d'études - ministères (Guerre, Air, Marine), - Radiodiffusion française, - Comité d’action scientifique de la Défense nationale,... • Etudes sur la propagation radioélectrique plusieurs départements (Tubes et hyperfréquence, Transmission, Laboratoire national de radioélectricité) • Recherches sur la troposphère et sur l’ionosphère Programme spatial du CNET lancé en 1957 selon deux directions : • participation au lancement de fusées-sondes pour l’exploration de la haute atmosphère • traitement scientifique des données fournies par les signaux émis par les satellites artificiels Samedis de l'Histoire de la 3AF Les fusées-sondes de Sud Aviation 15/10/2011 - 2 Contexte : Fusées-sondes existantes Fusées du CASDN pour l'AGI : • Véronique AGI : dérivée des Véronique N et NA (1952-1954) 60 kg à 210 km d'altitude • Monica IV et V : dérivées des Monica I à III (1955-1956) 15 kg à 80 km ou 140 km d'altitude Fusées de l'ONERA utilisées par le CEA : • Daniel : dérivé d'Ardaltex (1957-1959) 15 kg à 125 km d'altitude • Antarès : dérivé de l'engin d'essais de rentrée (1959-1961) 35 kg à 280 km d'altitude Samedis de l'Histoire de la 3AF Les fusées-sondes de Sud Aviation 15/10/2011 - 3 Définition des besoins du CNET Envoi d'une charge utile de 32 kg à 80 km, 120 km, 400 km et 1000 km d'altitude • fusées commandées à Sud Aviation • unité mobile construite
    [Show full text]
  • Suborbital Platforms and Range Services (SPARS)
    Suborbital Capabilities for Science & Technology Small Missions Workshop @ Johns Hopkins University June 10, 2019 Mike Hitch, Giovanni Rosanova Goddard Space Introduction Flight Center AGENDAWASP OPIS ▪ Purpose ▪ History & Importance of Suborbital Carriers to Science ▪ Suborbital Platforms ▪ Sounding Rockets ▪ Balloons (brief) ▪ Aircraft ▪ SmallSats ▪ WFF Engineering ▪ Q & A P-3 Maintenance 12-Jun-19 Competition Sensitive – Do Not Distribute 2 Goddard Space Purpose of the Meeting Flight Center Define theWASP OPISutility of Suborbital Carriers & “Small” Missions ▪ Sounding rockets, balloons and aircraft (manned and unmanned) provide a unique capability to scientists and engineers to: ▪ Allow PIs to enhance and advance technology readiness levels of instruments and components for very low relative cost ▪ Provide PIs actual science flight opportunities as a “piggy-back” on a planned mission flight at low relative cost ▪ Increase experience for young and mid-career scientists and engineers by allowing them to get their “feet wet” on a suborbital mission prior to tackling the much larger and more complex orbital endeavors ▪ The Suborbital/Smallsat Platforms And Range Services (SPARS) Line Of Business (LOB) can facilitate prospective PIs with taking advantage of potential suborbital flight opportunities P-3 Maintenance 12-Jun-19 Competition Sensitive – Do Not Distribute 3 Goddard Space Value of Suborbital Research – What’s Different? Flight Center WASP OPIS Different Risk/Mission Assurance Strategy • Payloads are recovered and refurbished. • Re-flights are inexpensive (<$1M for a balloon or sounding rocket vs >$10M - 100M for a ELV) • Instrumentation can be simple and have a large science impact! • Frequent flight opportunities (e.g. “piggyback”) • Development of precursor instrument concepts and mature TRLs • While Suborbital missions fully comply with all Agency Safety policies, the program is designed to take Higher Programmatic Risk – Lower cost – Faster migration of new technology – Smaller more focused efforts, enable Tiger Team/incubator experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurements of Auroral Particles by Means of Sounding Rockets of Mother-Daughter Type A
    MEASUREMENTS OF AURORAL PARTICLES BY MEANS OF SOUNDING ROCKETS OF MOTHER-DAUGHTER TYPE A. Falck KGI REPORT 192 NOVEMBER 1985 KIRUNA U-OI'HYSICAL INSTITITK MKINA N\X|1>I\ MEASUREMENTS OF AURORAL PARTICLES BY MEANS OF SOUNDING ROCKETS OF MOTHER-DAUGHTER TYPE by A. Falck Kiruna Geophysical Institute P.O. Box 704, S-981 27 KIRUNA, Sweden KGI Report 192 November 1985 Printed in Sweden Kiruna Geophysical Institute Kiruna 19^5 ISSN 034/-f 405 Contents Page 1. Presentation of the S17 payioads 3 1.1 The scientific objective of the sounding rockets S17 3 1.2 S17 experiments 3 1.3 Physical characteristics of the payioads 3 1.4 Physical characteristics of the Nike-Tomahawk rocket 5 1.5 Nominal characteristics of flight events 7 1.6 Attitude measurements 8 1.7 Separation of the two payload units 20 1.8 Telemetry and data analyzing technique 33 2. Description of the instrumentation for the particle experiments in the S17 payioads 38 2.1 General theory of CEM - detectors 38 2.2 Calibration of th* CEM - detectors 42 2.3 Solid state detectors in SI7 payioads 44 2.4 Mounting of the detectors 48 2.5 The efficiency of channel multipliers 48 3. Review of the geophysical conditions during the SI7 flights and presentation of some supporting observations 51 j.1 The auroral situation during S17 flights 51 :• 2 Magnetic activity 51 .'.3 Other supporting observations 56 .4 The lowlightlevel-TV-system 56 'K Particle fluxes and electric currents coupling the magnetosphere and the ionosphere during a magnetospheric substorm 66 4.1 Review of some substorm terminology and definitions 66 4.2 Reference and comparisons of SI7-2 measure- ments with the results of the IMS-study 75 4.3 Comparison of simultaneous particle observa- tions at low ionospheric altitude (S17-1) and at the magnetic equatorial region (ATS-6) 91 4.4 Summary and conclusions 99 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Space Grant Consortium
    CO_FY16_Year2_APD Colorado Space Grant Consortium Lead Institution: University of Colorado Boulder Director: Chris Koehler Telephone Number: 303.492.3141 Consortium URL: http://spacegrant.colorado.edu Grant Number: NNX15AK04H Lines of Business (LOBs): NASA Internships, Fellowships, and Scholarships; Stem Engagement; Institutional Engagement; Educator Professional Development A. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The National Space Grant College and Fellowship Program consists of 52 state-based, university- led Space Grant Consortia in each of the 50 states plus the District of Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Annually, each consortium receives funds to develop and implement student fellowships and scholarships programs; interdisciplinary space-related research infrastructure, education, and public service programs; and cooperative initiatives with industry, research laboratories, and state, local, and other governments. Space Grant operates at the intersection of NASA’s interest as implemented by alignment with the Mission Directorates and the state’s interests. Although it is primarily a higher education program, Space Grant programs encompass the entire length of the education pipeline, including elementary/secondary and informal education. The Colorado Space Grant Consortium is a Designated Consortium funded at a level of $760,000 for fiscal year 2016. B. PROGRAM GOALS • Population of students engaged in COSGC hands-on programs (awardees and non- awardees) will be at least 40% women and 23.7% from ethnic minority populations underrepresented in STEM fields. • Maintain student hands-on programs at all 8 COSGC Minority Serving Institutions and engaged at least 30 students on MSI campuses. • 30% of COSGC NASA funds will be awarded directly to students. • Award 80 scholarships to support students working on hands-on projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounding Rockets 2017 Annual Report
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Sounding Rockets Annual Report 2017 particle energy measurements. Where once five or six free flying subpayloads were possible, now twenty or more are feasible. Astrophysicists are always wanting to collect more photons to enhance scientific return. This dictates a need for either larger diameter payloads to accommodate larger mirrors, or longer obser- vation times – and usually both. Astrophysics missions have, to a large extent, been limited to flying from White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico due to the requirement to recover the instruments for re-flight. Longer flights require higher apogees, which gener- ally dictate the need for ranges with larger impact areas. Larger launch ranges usually require flight over the ocean. The program is developing new water recovery technologies to enable such missions at a cost that is commensurate with the low-cost nature of the program. The new system includes a hydrodynamic wedge to reduce impact loads and sealed sections to protect the science instruments and expensive support systems such as telemetry and attitude control systems. The trick is, each of these systems needs to have some sort of exposure to the outside environment during the scientific data period, yet be sealed when they impact the ocean. While ocean recovery has been done for essentially the entire life of the program, it has involved relatively basic systems that offered few Phil Eberspeaker from the Chief Message engineering challenges. Now telescopes, telemetry systems, attitude Chief, Sounding Rockets Program Office controls systems, and even the recovery systems themselves need to be protected so they can be reflow on future missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Outer Space
    • ';\ I,:~t 1 l I ' i i REPORT I I: OF THE l: 1\ COMMI'ITEE ~ ~l ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE I' i GENERAL ASSEMBLY ! OFFICIAL RECORDS: TWENTY·SEVENTH SESSION I , , SUPPLEMENT No.20 (A/B720) UNITED NATIONS - , ! i ,:l;.~ .'.'~ , ~r I t '( .1 ~ ·. I J ~ I " l d. (261 p.) REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE. ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL RECORDS: TWENTY·SEVENTH SESSION SUPPLEMENT NO.20 (A/8720) UNITED NATIONS New York, 1972 III .111' drill d a dl ] F NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention ofsuch a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. 1" ..I! -/Original: English7- CONTENTS Paragraphs Pa~e I. INTRODUCTION ••••••••• • . .. .. 1 - 10 1 II. REPORT OF THE LEGAL SUB-COMMITTEE •• .. .. 11 - 20 3 III. REPORT OF THE SCIENTIFIC .AND TECHNICAL SUB-COMMITTEE •••••••••••• . • • 21 - 50 5 IV. OTHER MATTERS • . .. .. '. ... .. •• 0 • 51 - 57 10 V. FUTURE WORK OF THE COMMITTEE AND ITS SUBSIDIARY ORGAN'S •• •••••••••••••• • • • • 58 - 60 12 ANNEXES 1. Statement by the Secretary-General at the bpening meeting of the 'resumed fifteenth session of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space on 5 September 1972 •••. .. 13 II. Opening statement by the Chaiman at the 110th meeting of the Committee on 5 September 1972 •••• • • • •• . 16 III. Statement by the Chairman of the Legal Sub-Committee at the 110th meeting of the Committee on 5 September 1972 . 23 -iii- ,:l;.~ .'.'~ , ~r I t '( .1 ~ ·. I J ~ I " l d. (261 p.) .J 'k ~\ 1)11 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Commercial Spaceports
    The New Commercial Spaceports Derek Webber1 Spaceport Associates, Rockville, Maryland 20852,USA During the second half of the 20th Century, the first launch sites were established, mostly during the ‘fifties and ‘sixties. They were originally a product of the cold war and served military and civil government purposes. They were used for launching sounding rockets, space probes, for missile testing and injecting military, scientific, and eventually commercial satellites into orbit. Initially the sites were in either the USA or the former Soviet Union, but gradually they were introduced in other countries too. Governmental astronaut crews were also sent into orbit from these early launch sites. As the 21st Century begins, a new era is emerging where a fuller range of commercial missions will be undertaken and moreover where public space travel will become common place. This situation ushers in a new kind of launch facility, known as the commercial spaceport. I. Introduction here will be vastly different requirements for the future public space travelers, and their families and friends, T than are normally available at the traditional launch sites built fifty years ago. Indeed, the creation of this emerging kind of facility, the commercial spaceport, is in some ways a very necessary part of the creation of the new space businesses that the twenty-first century offers. It will be essential that, while the space tourism companies are becoming established in order to provide services to the new public space travelers, suitable ground based facilities will be developed in parallel to sustain and support these operations. This paper provides an insight into these commercial spaceport facilities, and their characteristics, in order to assist in both design and business planning processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Modelling and Simulation of a 100 Km Hybrid Sounding Rocket
    PERFORMANCE MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF A 100 KM HYBRID SOUNDING ROCKET Fiona Kay Leverone Submitted in fulfilment of the academic requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal Supervisor: Mr Michael Brooks Co-Supervisor: Mr Jean-François Pitot de la Beaujardiere Co-Supervisor: Prof Lance Roberts December 2013 2. DECLARATION 1 - PLAGIARISM I, Fiona Leverone, declare that 1. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research. 2. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. 3. This thesis does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons. 4. This thesis does not contain other persons’ writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: a. Their words have been re-written but the general information attributed to them has been referenced b. Where their exact words have been used, then their writing has been placed inside quotation marks, and referenced. 5. This thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the thesis and in the References sections. Signed ________________________ Date ___________ Miss Fiona Leverone As the candidate’s supervisor I have approved this dissertation for submission. Signed ________________________ Date ___________ Mr. Michael Brooks As the candidates co-supervisor I have approved this dissertation for submission. Signed ________________________ Date ___________ Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • What's Inside... in Brief
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration What’s inside... 2 Features 5 Integration and Testing 4 1 3 2 2015 6 Picture Place 7 Other News 8 Schedule & Miscellanea Sounding Rockets Program Office 46.012 UO Koehler - RockSat-X was succesfully launched In Brief... from Wallops Island on August 12, 2015. The new Black Brant Mk 4 vehicle will fly for the first time in October 2015 from Wallops Island. The payload carries several technology test experi- ments and instruments. Payload teams are preparing for the coming Norway campaign. Two rockets will be launched from Andoya with the launch window opening on November 27. The Multiple User Suborbital Instru- ment Carrier (MUSIC) payload will be launched from Wallops Island in Oc- tober on a Terrier-Improved Malemute rocket. The sounding rockets program will cel- ebrate 45-years at Wallops on Novem- ber 30, 2015. More on page 7. A very busy flight schedule is in prog- ress. The Sounding Rockets Program has 11 missions on schedule during the Students from Hawaii with their experiment after the successful flight. period September through November. The 46.012 UO RockSat-X mission was launched from Wallops Island, VA on Au- Three have been successfully complet- gust 12, 2015. RockSat-X is the most advanced of three student flight programs ed and eight remain. managed by Colorado Space Grant Consortium and supported by NASA. RockSat- X provides participating University faculty and students an opportunity to build, RockSat-X continued... test and fly an experiment of their own University Of Hawaii Community College design onboard a Terrier-Improved System University of Nebraska Lincoln (UNL) Malemute sounding rocket and in- Project Imua The experiment from the University of cludes full featured sounding rocket The primary mission goal for Project Nebraska Lincoln compared buoyant support systems, such as telemetry, Imua is to encourage UHCC students to convection on the ground in the pres- attitude control and recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]