<<

America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 ten rivers reaching the crossroads in the next 12 months

WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG

AOL KEYWORD: AMERICAN RIVERS About America’s Most Endangered Rivers

Each year since 1986, American Rivers and its partners in the river movement have released the America’s Most Endangered Rivers report to highlight rivers nationwide reaching crucial crossroads. The report highlights acute threats rather than chronic conditions; it is not a list of the nation’s “worst” or most polluted rivers.

American Rivers solicits nominations annually from thousands of river groups, conserva- tion organizations, outdoor clubs, and individual activists. Our staff and scientific advisors review the nominations for the following criteria: ■ The magnitude of the threat to the river ■ A major decision point in the coming year affecting that threat ■ The regional and national significance of the river This report does more than list problems; it highlights alternatives and solutions, identifies those who will make the crucial decisions, and points out opportunities for the public to take action on behalf of each listed river. America’s Most Endangered Rivers has a distinguished track record of improved public policy decisions that benefit listed rivers.

Recognizing that the threats facing the listed rivers are seldom unique, each report includes a special chapter that explores a broader issue suggested by the rivers on the list that year. This year’s report explores how new loopholes and lax enforcement of clean water laws will accelerate the trend towards more polluted rivers nationwide. about american rivers

American Rivers, founded in 1973, is the leader of a nationwide river conservation move- ment. American Rivers is dedicated to protecting and restoring healthy natural rivers, and the variety of life they sustain, for the benefit of people, fish and wildlife.

On the Cover: America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 (left to right): Snake River (#3), Ingredients include: hot water, chopped up salmon, invasive predators; Tennessee River (#4), Ingredients include: water, , E. coli, dysentery, hepatitis, cryptosporidium; Allegheny and Monongahela rivers (#5), Ingredients include: water, acid, iron, aluminum, manganese; Colorado River (#1), Ingredients include: water, uranium, nitrates, ammonium perchlorate, ammonia; Peace River (#8), Ingredients include: water, clay, uranium, radium; (#7), Ingredients include: water, PCBs; Big Sunflower River (#2), Ingredients include: water, DDT, toxaphene; Spokane River (#6), Ingredients include: water, sewage, lead, arsenic, zinc, and cadmium; Mississippi River (#10), Ingredients include: water, sediment, nutrients, pesticides; Big Darby Creek (#9), Ingredients may soon include: stormwater, trash, sediment, fertilizer, automotive fluids

Photo of bottles by Harriet Wise. Photo credits for bottle labels which contain photos: Allegheny and Mononga- hela rivers: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Colorado River: Tim Palmer; Peace River: Environmental PR Group; Housatonic River: ClarkeOutdoors.com; Big Sunflower River: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Spokane River: photo courtesy Sierra Club; Big Darby Creek: copyright Jim Murtha

Design: Gallagher/Wood Design Printing: Laser Image

This publication made possible by a generous gift from Barbara B. Cohn. Table of Contents

Introduction

Back to the Future: the Forgotten Lesson of the Colorado River ...... 4

Wetlands and at Risk ...... 7

National Vision and Local Action Lead to Cleaner Water ...... 8

Map: Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 ...... 12

Most Endangered Rivers (by rank)

1. Colorado River ...... 13

2. Big Sunflower River ...... 16

3. Snake River ...... 18

4. Tennessee River ...... 20

5. Allegheny and Monongahela rivers ...... 22

6. Spokane River ...... 24

7. Housatonic River ...... 26

8. Peace River ...... 28

9. Big Darby Creek ...... 30

10. Mississippi River ...... 32 Back tothefuture:Theforgotten ASSU TO UP CAUSES and regulations. water laws into America’sclean giant loopholes Congress arecarving The WhiteHouseand S LNSE E YEAR PER ILLNESSES WG NORWATER OUR IN EWAGE 3.5 MILLION . 4 about theconsequencesofwater pollution ers hundredsofmillionsdollars. Cleanup ofthesetwositescould costtaxpay- radioactive pileintotheriver someday. willsweep the fear thatafloodorearthquake sure ifthelevelsofexposurearesafe.Many gated withitswater. Noscientistcansayfor both theColoradoRiverandinproduceirri- causing radioactivewastepiledalongthe way, theyleftbehindamountainofcancer- raced tobuildawinningarsenal.Alongthe asthey insulated itscontractorsfromscrutiny the next,itoffersalessonforourtimes. generation’s environmentalneglectburdening ofone Endangered Riverof2004.Asastory T ◆ Although thedaysofpleading ignorance During theColdWar, theU.S.government America’s Most EndangeredRivers of2004 Grand Canyon,isAmerica’s Most he ColoradoRiver, architect ofthe toxic rocketfuelarefoundin generation. Trace amountsofthe has leftaheavyburdenforthis atthetime. was anafterthought prospect ofpoisoningtheriver have preventedthis,butthe inNevada.Foresightcould tary lons ofrocketfuelalongatribu- Utah andspilledmillionsofgal- banks oftheColoradoRiverin This shortsighted costcutting This shortsighted

AMERICAN RIVERS IMAGE LIBRARY concluded that about one-fourth ofthe concluded thataboutone-fourth this laxenforcement.InJune2003,theEPA tors hasdropped,aswell. office. Thesizeofthefinesimposedonviola- luters asitwasbeforePresidentBushtook than halfasmany“violationnotices”topol- mental ProtectionAgency(EPA) isissuingless thattheU.S.Environ- newspapers reported results. InDecember2003,KnightRidder environmental laws—withunfortunate and Congresshavecutthebudgettoenforce water laws.”Herearesomehighlights: ourclean actionstoundermine “pervasive administration’scurrent recordasaseriesof that regulatepollutingactivities. campaign contributorstofederalpositions ate approvedtheappointmentsofmany Cheney campaign.Aftertheelection,Sen- giving thelargestslicebyfartoBush- more than$44milliononthe2000election— that America’s mostpollutingindustriesspent estimates environmental groupEarthjustice encouragement ofcorporatelobbyists.The rivers fromtheColorado’s fate. by earlierleaderswhosoughttospareother the cleanwaterlawsandregulationswritten giantloopholesinto are deliberatelycarving have passed,theWhiteHouseandCongress Polluters haveclearlytakenadvantageof For thepastthreeyears,WhiteHouse Senator JamesJeffords(I-VT)describesthe They aredoingsowiththegenerous

U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE lesson of the Colorado River

nation’s largest industrial plants and water of pipes is compounded by pollution running ORG treatment facilities were in “significant non- off the land and the destruction of wetlands . compliance” with standards at and streams. One of the most destructive and any one time. More than 10 percent of those polluting land uses is “mountaintop removal” ITTAKESGRIT lawbreakers were dumping 10 times more pol- coal mining, a practice that has already buried lution than allowed into local streams and more than 720 miles of streams and damaged rivers. 1,200 more in the Ohio River watershed in The public only learned about this after recent years. someone leaked a copy of the audit to a Wash- In August 2001, Deputy Interior Secretary ington Post reporter. Steven Griles, a former coal lobbyist, assured On his first day in office, President Bush the West Virginia Coal Association that the tabled a proposal to require wastewater treat- Bush administration “places importance on ment plants to notify the public when they increasing coal production and reducing the barriers that could prevent its development.” On Griles’s watch, the Interior Department NOAA has worked steadily to remove restrictions on mining along banks or dumping mine rubble and refuse in streambeds, despite clear evidence documenting the spike in flooding, acid drainage, and toxic heavy metals down- HUMAN AND ANIMAL EXCRE- stream. MENT CAN MAKE WATER

Rules that protect wetlands and small UNSAFE TO TOUCH. TOXIC

streams — which soak up both pollution and CHEMICALS AND HEAVY floodwaters and provide a home for wildlife — METALS CAN MAKE WATER are a favorite target of real estate developers UNSAFE TO DRINK AND FISH and coal companies. The real estate industry donated more than $4.3 million to the Bush- UNSAFE TO EAT. Cheney campaign in 2000, the campaign’s third-most generous supporter. spilled raw sewage into local streams and In January 2002, the administration issued rivers. This silence can be deadly. EPA scien- blanket nationwide permits that aid developers tists estimate that up to 3.5 million Ameri- by liberalizing the construction of shopping cans get sick each year from germs found in centers, tract housing, and corporate campuses While America’s sewage-laced water. The young and the old are on wetlands and in flood-prone areas. One year waters became most likely to die from resulting diseases such later, the Bush administration ordered federal as hepatitis and dysentery. field staff to stop protecting millions of acres progressively In November 2003, the administration fol- of wetlands and to get approval from Washing- lowed up by proposing to sanction “blending” ton superiors before protecting millions more cleaner from fully and partially treated sewage before — about 20 percent of the remaining wetlands 1973 to 1998, dumping it into rivers, asking only that the and many stream miles. utility determine (for itself) that rainwater Scientific data makes it clear that this is that trend has rushing into the sewer made it necessary. This not the time to yank teeth out of the nation’s year, having thrown away the stick, the Bush clean water laws. While America’s waters now reversed administration withheld the carrots, too. The became progressively cleaner from 1973 to itself. White House asked Congress to cut the 1998, that trend has now reversed itself. The amount of money that EPA will loan to com- most recent data from 2000 suggests that 40 munities for sewage treatment upgrades by percent of our rivers, 46 percent of our lakes, more than one-third — almost half a billion and over half our estuaries are too polluted for dollars — for 2005. fishing or swimming. Pollution pouring into America’s rivers out Once again, EPA made this data public only

Introduction ◆ 5 back to the future continued

wanting to highlight new perils for their We All Live Downstream: hometown rivers in future editions of this PERCENTAGE OF IMPAIRED ESTUARIES endangered rivers report. The lesson of the endangered Colorado

EPA OFFICE OF WATER River is that relaxing environ- : 51% mental vigilance imposes 44% huge burdens on the DATA SOURCE

; next generation. 37% 38% Americans believe that clean water is a right — not a privilege — and ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS .

they expect leader- S . ship — not secrecy — U from Washington on a problem that transcends state and local boundaries. NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL CHART Without a change in course, we are headed 1994 1996 1998 2000 back to the future. “By 2016,” former EPA Administrator Christine Whitman warned in a report on sewage released prior to her depar- ESTUARIES — THE MOUTHS after American Rivers and its partners filed a ture, “pollution levels could be similar to lev- OF RIVERS — RECEIVE Freedom of Information Act request for it. els observed in the mid-1970s.” POLLUTION FROM EVERY Americans can expect to see this trend

RIVER AND STREAM IN THEIR towards dirtier water accelerate as polluters across the country exploit new loopholes in WATERSHED. Rebecca R. Wodder clean water laws. American Rivers is prepar- President ing for a bumper crop of appeals from frustrat- American Rivers ed communities all across the country NRCS

6 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 Wetlands and streams at risk

Public outcry averts graver threat In January 2003, the Bush administration provoked a firestorm of opposition with a pair of actions that threaten wetlands and ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS . S .

streams across the country. The first was to U issue policy guidance that jeopardizes protec- tions for some 20 million acres of wetlands and many small streams. The second was to launch a process to completely exclude those and other waters from the Clean Water Act. Documents leaked to the Los Angeles Times suggested that agency insiders were contem- plating a sweeping reduction in the scope of the law. The public had other ideas. Some 133,000 citizens, scientists, conservation watchdogs, river groups, and hunting and fishing organiza- tions contacted EPA — 99 percent of them through groundwater, wet weather overflows, AS WETLANDS DISAPPEAR, protesting the proposal. Thirty-nine states and and the movement of wildlife. FLOODS BECOME MORE 244 members of the U.S. Congress also spoke Comments from states to EPA confirm the FREQUENT AND SEVERE. out in opposition to the move. In the end, this ongoing threat the policy guidance poses: outpouring of public and expert opposition convinced administration insiders that they “Any extensive change to the scope of streams could not completely gut the Act. On Dec. 16, and wetlands subject to the jurisdiction of the 2003, EPA Administrator Mike Leavitt Clean Water Act would reverse 30 years of announced that the administration would not progress that has been achieved.” officially write whole classes of waters out of — Kentucky Department for the Clean Water Act. Environmental Protection As sweet as the victory was, it did not “While it is hard to show the impact on flood- remove the threat to clean water. Administra- ing from the loss of one wetland, the cumula- tor Leavitt left the destructive policy guidance tive impact from the loss of wetlands can be in place that imposes a double standard, leav- staggering. Isolated wetlands have an impor- ing federal field staff free not to protect wet- tant role in storing floodwaters.” lands and streams. These staff must get — Association of State Floodplain Managers approval from supervisors in Washington before protecting certain classes of streams With 60,000 acres of wetlands lost each year and wetlands, but not if they choose to look even before this guidance was issued, this policy the other way when those waters are polluted must be halted. To reaffirm that the original or developed. Clean Water Act intended to protect all waters The wetlands and streams at risk are as of the , lawmakers have drafted vital to water quality, and the Clean Water Authority Restoration Act. human health as any other wetland and Enactment of this bill would eliminate ques- stream. The best-known category of threat- tions about what is and isn’t protected by clari- ened waters is prairie potholes, where up to 70 fying that Congress’s original intent was for the percent of North America’s duck population Clean Water Act to cover all waters. originates. The administration erroneously Concerned citizens ready to speak out again calls these and many other types of wetlands — this time to their representatives in the U.S. “isolated,” a term that does not appear in the Congress — can learn more at www.savethe- law. The wetlands are connected to others cleanwateract.org.

Introduction ◆ 7 National vision and local

The Clean For more than 30 years, the Clean Water Act is Water Act has been a cornerstone of America’s efforts to protect public health and a daily tool improve the quality of our environment. Our waters and rivers are healthier and safer than for the they were before the Act was passed. The Act not only commits the nation to cleaning up growing river AMERICAN RIVERS IMAGE LIBRARY its rivers and streams, it provides the public movement. with opportunities to hold government agen- cies, polluters, and developers accountable. All across the country, there is a growing river movement — citizens exercising their rights under the Clean Water Act to improve their communities by restoring rivers and from many small streams and wetlands. Her streams. As they go about their business, they organization battles polluters on headwater keep one eye trained on Washington D.C., streams that feed the Cahaba. where congressional and agency actions have “Eliminating protections for small streams the potential to bolster or scuttle years of ignores watershed science,” charged Stewart. work. Here are some of their stories: “Dumping pollution into a small stream can Beth Stewart, hurt water quality just as much as dumping it Cahaba River Society into a major river.” The Cahaba River serves as the drinking Beth Stewart, executive director of the Birm- water source for Birmingham-area residents — ingham, Ala.-based Cahaba River Society, one-fourth of Alabama’s population — so breathed a sigh of relief when the Bush admin- water quality in the river is an especially sen- istration backed down from its threats to sitive issue. The river is also a remarkably remove the Clean Water Act’s protections rich ecosystem, with more species of fish per mile than any other river in North America. The Nature Conservancy designated it as one of eight river “Biodiversity Hotspots” in the United States. Stewart said the Cahaba watershed and waters throughout Alabama need strong feder- al water protection requirements because AMERICAN RIVERS IMAGE LIBRARY Alabama’s Department of Environmental Management is “dysfunctional, underfunded and weak on enforcement.” “Our state agency already takes the least protective interpretation of federal require- ments possible,” Stewart explained. “If the federal government does not clearly require clean water in certain situations, our state agency is likely to cut that from their program.”

RIVER ACTIVISTS KEEP ONE EYE ON THEIR LOCAL

STREAMS — AND ONE EYE ON WASHINGTON.

8 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 action lead to cleaner water

Nelson Ross, Tennessee Izaak Walton League NRCS While it backed off from a wholesale gutting of clean water protections, the Bush adminis- tration continues to dole out favors in the form of loopholes and exemptions sought by polluting interests. One EPA proposal would allow sewage plants to mix partially untreat- ed sewage with fully treated sewage during heavy rains. By allowing these facilities to skip a treatment process, EPA would be sanc- tioning the release of disease-causing viruses, parasites, pathogens and diseases into rivers and other waters. This prospect worries Nelson Ross, whose Knoxville, Tenn., office overlooks the Ten- nessee River. Ross, executive director of the Tennessee Izaak Walton League, said that pol- lution levels in a troubled river would be worsened. “EPA’s new sewage blending pro- posal,” he complained, “is exactly what the Tennessee River doesn’t need.” “By making it easier to dump sewage in the river, the EPA is rewarding sewage treat- ment utilities for dragging their feet on main- Wayne Freeman, Great RIVER CONSERVATION MEANS tenance and upgrades,” Rivers Habitat Alliance ENJOYING THE PRESENT AND lamented Ross, who Sewage plants are big, obvious polluters, but PROVIDING FOR THE FUTURE. describes the Ten- pollution also washes into rivers from fields, nessee River’s lawns, parking lots, and roads, as well. Tack- water quality as ling this type of pollution requires a different “compromised.” approach. “Wastewater Wayne Freeman, who directs the Great treatment plants Rivers Habitat Alliance in St. Louis, relies on in Knoxville,” he

AMERICAN RIVERS IMAGE LIBRARY the Clean Water Act in his fight against reported, “released a urban sprawl in river floodplains. Section 404 billion and a half gal- of the law recognizes the link between wet- lons of partially untreated lands and cleaner water, and requires devel- sewage into the Tennessee River in 2003.” opers to get federal approval before digging up Ross also worries about 325 sewage overflows or filling wetlands. Freeman keeps a close eye that dumped nearly 9 million gallons of raw on applications and permits. When some- sewage into urban streams which flow into thing is amiss, he sounds the alarm. If neces- the river during that same year. sary, the law gives him the tools to take legal According to Ross, EPA’s new sewage action. blending proposal would result in more inci- “Without section 404 of the Clean Water dents of this nature and less recourse for citi- Act, we wouldn’t have a lever to push for zens who want to stop the release of sound land-use planning on floodplains,” inadequately treated sewage into waters near Freeman said. them. Severe flooding in the 1990s along the Mississippi and Missouri rivers should have inspired more respect for the ways of these

Introduction ◆ 9 national vision / local action continued

large rivers, but Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program Freeman points to a requires states and EPA to identify rivers,

MAINE PEER string of recent lakes and coastal waters that are impaired by development pro- polluted runoff, to assess the sources of the posals on frequently pollution, to develop cleanup plans, and to flooded lands near monitor the success of the plans. St. Louis that are Bob Zimmerman, keeping him busy. Some development Charles River Watershed is proposed for areas Association that just a decade Visitors to often take home beautiful ago were covered by pictures of crew teams on the Charles 10 feet of water. By River at twilight. Bob Zimmerman, executive defending wetlands, director of the Charles River Watershed Asso- Freeman protects both clean water and the ciation, sees the river in a different light. residents and businesses that might other- “We identified the Charles as an impaired, wise end up in harm’s way. dirty river,” said Zimmerman, “and we initi- “Some of the land to be developed isn’t ated a program in 1994 that stopped the just in the floodplain,” exclaims Freeman, dumping of 1 million gallons of raw sewage “it is in that part of the floodplain most each day into the last 10 miles of the river.” vulnerable to flooding.” Zimmerman’s organization and EPA then The provisions of the Clean Water Act developed a TMDL program to clean up the are useful not just for protecting wetlands polluted . “We’re now in the and streams from development. The Act’s hardest part of the clean-up,” he explained.

RIVER CONSERVATIONISTS SAVE

THEIR HOMETOWN RIVERS WITH

THEIR HEARTS, THEIR HANDS,

AND THEIR VOICES. AMERICAN RIVERS IMAGE LIBRARY

10 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 Our Partners

American Rivers gratefully acknowledges the following organizations for their contributions to this report and their ongoing efforts to save

ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS the rivers on this year’s list. . S . U ALABAMA RIVERS ALLIANCE BRACY TUCKER BROWN CHARLOTTE COUNTY COMMISSION COLORADO RIVER REGIONAL SEWER COALITION COLUMBIA RIVER INTER-TRIBAL FISH COMMISSION DARBY CREEK ASSOCIATION ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP FRIENDS OF THE CHEAT RIVER CLEAN WATER LEADS TO HAPPY CHILDHOOD MEMORIES. FRIENDS OF THE EARTH GRAND CANYON TRUST Zimmerman and his organization are pur- GULF RESTORATION NETWORK suing cutting edge approaches to protect and HARDEE COUNTY CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION restore the Charles. Innovative runoff con- HOUSATONIC ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION trols, low impact development planning, envi- LEAGUE ronmental zoning, and the protection of lands HOUSATONIC RIVER INITIATIVE critical to and river recharge are a few IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE of the programs underway to restore a more IDAHO RIVERS UNITED natural water cycle to the river. ILLINOIS STEWARDSHIP ALLIANCE And the progress has been significant. The INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURE AND TRADE POLICY Charles, Zimmerman says, is now swimmable KENTUCKY WATERWAYS ALLIANCE 92 percent of the time, compared to 39 per- LAKE HAVASU CITY, ARIZ. cent of the time in 1995. “The river has made MANASOTA-88 a big comeback, and TMDLs are helping us MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN ALLIANCE establish new approaches to restoring and pro- NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY tecting the river.” NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION NORTHWEST SPORTFISHING INDUSTRY Conservationists like Bob Zimmerman, ASSOCIATION Wayne Freeman, Nelson Ross, and Beth Stew- PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF art are not alone. They are just four of the FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS many committed citizens involved in count- PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL SAVE OUR WILD SALMON less state and local watershed groups who are SIERRA CLUB, MISSISSIPPI CHAPTER striving for cleaner water in communities SIERRA CLUB, NEVADA CHAPTER throughout the nation. SIERRA CLUB, UPPER COLUMBIA RIVER GROUP TENNESSEE CLEAN WATER NETWORK TENNESSEE IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE THE NATURE CONSERVANCY WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA COALITION FOR ABANDONED MINE RECLAMATION

Introduction ◆ 11 America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004

6

3 7

5 9 10 1 4

2

8

1. COLORADO RIVER 2. BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER 3. SNAKE RIVER 4. TENNESSEE RIVER 5. ALLEGHENY & MONONGAHELA RIVERS 6. SPOKANE RIVER 7. HOUSATONIC RIVER 8. PEACE RIVER 9. BIG DARBY CREEK 10. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COLORADO, UTAH, NEVADA, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA #1 Colorado River

THREAT: LOOMING POLLUTION CRISIS

Summary As much as 20 percent of the river’s water While conflict over Colorado River water evaporates from the reservoirs behind the allocations has grabbed headlines for years, dams each year. Several of the river’s native water pollution problems from human waste, wildlife species are extinct, and others nearly toxic chemicals, and radioactive material have so. Most years, the river literally evaporates been largely overlooked and threaten to get shortly after crossing the border into Mexico. much worse. Unless Congress and the federal The once vast and rich delta at the river’s RANDY SHOWSTACK government step in to bolster local cleanup mouth in the Gulf of California has virtually efforts, the drinking water for 25 million disappeared as a result. Americans will remain at risk. The Risk The River Three major sources of pollution are seeping The Colorado River starts as melting snow in into the Colorado River via contaminated the Rocky Mountains. Covering almost groundwater. Some efforts are being made to 250,000 square miles, the river basin includes address each of them, but more aggressive and portions of seven states and more than 20 better-coordinated action is needed to protect Indian nations. Despite the vastness of its the health of the river, the 25 million Ameri- cans who drink its water, and the wildlife and parks found along it. Human waste from riverfront boomtowns

BOB SCHULZ in California and Arizona contaminates the river below Hoover Dam. This area has the largest concentration of people in the United States using septic tanks. The overloaded sep- tic systems allow increasing quantities of nitrates to seep into groundwater and the Col- LEFT: COMMUNITIES ALONG orado River. Monitoring wells in the Lake THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER Havasu area have recorded nitrate levels four ARE STRUGGLING TO PROVIDE times higher than the limits set by the Envi- WASTEWATER TREATMENT TO ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) to protect THEIR BOOMING POPULATIONS. the public health. High nitrate levels in drink- ing water can deplete oxygen in infants’ blood (“blue baby” syndrome) and are suspected to cause certain types of cancer. An estimated watershed, the Colorado is a small river, 1.2 million pounds of nitrates will seep into annually averaging only about 1 percent of the the regional aquifer between 2001 and 2005. Mississippi River’s yearly flows. Riverfront communities in Arizona and As the river winds across the Colorado California rec- Plateau, the ranches, mines, and reservations ognize the prob- LAKE HAVASU CITY, ARIZ. NITRATE DATA of the Old West uneasily share the landscape lem and are NITRATE ENTERING GROUNDWATER ALONG THE with the national parks, ski resorts, and sub- raising capital COLORADO RIVER OVER EACH 5-YEAR PERIOD urban sprawl of the New West. When the river on their own to 1,500,000 pours out of the Grand Canyon in Arizona it upgrade waste- enters the Sonoran Desert, where a shortage of water treatment 1,000,000 500,000

water has failed to curb explosive population capacities. They POUNDS growth in recent decades. could use some 0 The Colorado is one of the most intensive- help, but in 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 TO TO TO TO TO TO TO ly used — and abused — river basins in Amer- recent years fed- 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

ica. More than 40 major dams and diversions eral assistance SOURCE: COLORADO RIVER REGIONAL SEWER COALITION siphon water from the river and its tributaries. to states for

Colorado River ◆ 13 Colorado River continued

wastewater treatment facilities has been cut a crude, unlined impoundment on the river- by more than 10 percent, and the current bank, the former Atlas Minerals Corporation administration proposes slashing site is the fifth largest and single most danger- some 30 percent — half a billion ous uranium tailings pile in the country. An dollars — from loan programs for estimated 110,000 gallons of radioactive facility upgrades. groundwater seep into the river each day from A second type of contamina- this site. Uranium is one of the few carcino-

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION tion is an ingredient in rocket gens considered dangerous at any level, and fuel called perchlorate, which levels in the river increase by 1,660 percent in has been measured in Lake Mead the vicinity of the Atlas site. at concentrations as high as 24 Although the precise contribution from the parts per billion. Although no Atlas site is unknown, Southern California’s POLLUTED WATER FROM COL- federal health standard for perchlorate has Metropolitan Water District has measured ORADO RIVER WATER IS USED been set, low concentrations can interfere gradually increasing levels of radioactivity in TO IRRIGATE CROPS — TRACE with proper thyroid function and disrupt the the river hundreds of miles downstream at its AMOUNTS OF THE TOXIC CHEM- body’s normal hormonal balance. The poten- Lake Havasu intake, where the drinking water ICALS CAN BE MEASURED IN tial health effects of perchlorate are especially for 16 million people is withdrawn from the PRODUCE ON SUPERMARKET significant for children because disturbances river. The National Academy of Sciences has SHELVES ACROSS THE COUN- in thyroid levels during development can lead warned that it is “nearly certain that the river’s TRY (BELOW). to lowered IQ, mental retardation, and the course will run across the Moab site sometime loss of hearing, speech and motor skills. The in the future,” flooding about a half ton of Las Vegas Valley Water District is unable to radioactive material for every man, woman, remove perchlorate from water piped to its and child that drinks Colorado River water. residential customers. Lettuce and other leafy vegetables irrigated with Colorado River water The 12-Month Outlook contain trace amounts of the chemical — and The Colorado River is at a crossroads, and the are found on supermarket shelves across the next 12 months will determine whether these country during winter months. problems will continue to fester or a vigorous The source of perchlorate in the river is a cleanup effort will begin. The situation as a facility in Henderson, Nev., where the govern- whole warrants a massive, coordinated federal ment produced missile fuel during the Cold effort, and there are immediate steps that War. The plant is now operated by Kerr- should be taken to address these pollution McGee Corporation, which has already spent sources. $80 million to reduce the volume of polluted The Department of Energy (DOE) will final- groundwater reaching ize its plans for the radioactive mill tailings at the river. However, the Atlas site before the end of 2004. Conserva-

ERIC ECKL more than 400 pounds tionists believe the best option is to completely of perchlorate still remove the mill tailings and contaminated soil flow from the facility from the river floodplain, but the DOE has sig- toward Lake Mead naled that it will likely choose less protective each day. options that would not provide sufficient secu- The third pollution rity in the event of a major flood. DOE should source is radioactive not allow cost to dictate its choices. It should mill waste from a commit to the most thorough cleanup possible defunct facility along with current technology. the Colorado River In the 2004 session of Congress, lawmakers near Moab, Utah. will consider proposals to expand exemptions With almost 12 mil- from environmental laws for the Department lion tons of radioac- of Defense. Conservationists fear these could tive material stored in let the military off the hook for its share of the

14 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 cleanup responsibilities at the Kerr-McGee site and elsewhere. Congress should reject those bills and direct EPA to set a scientifical- ly valid drinking water standard for perchlo- rate that will protect human health. Also in the 2004 session of Congress, law- makers will consider President Bush’s propos- al for sharp cuts in EPA’s “State Revolving Loan Funds” program that assists state efforts with loans to upgrade drinking water and wastewater treatment. Funding shortages are the leading reason that communities struggle to meet their obligations to protect water they send downstream. Congress should fully fund this vital program. In addition, Congress should recognize that the interstate nature of pollution problems in the Colorado River warrant a stronger federal role in cleanup. Congress should direct federal and state agencies to develop a binding action plan and authorize federal funding to restore TOM TILL water quality throughout the river basin — including addressing nitrates, perchlorate, and enforcement and interpretation of the Clean IT MAY BE ONLY A MATTER radioactive materials. Water Act and pass the Clean Water Authority OF TIME BEFORE A FLOOD OR The lingering contamination and staggering Restoration Act in the 2004 session to end the EARTHQUAKE SENDS 11 remediation costs at the Kerr-McGee and lingering debate over which waters are pro- MILLION TONS OF RADIOAC- Atlas sites provide a stark reminder that pre- tected by federal law. TIVE WASTE FROM THE ATLAS venting pollution in the first place or cleaning URANIUM MILL INTO THE it at the source is always preferable to clean- Contacts COLORADO RIVER. ing it later. Congress should step up its over- ERIC ECKL, American Rivers, (202) 347-7550 sight of the Bush administration’s ext. 3023, [email protected] BRENT BLACKWELDER, Friends of the Earth, (877) 843-8687, [email protected] TERRY BRACY, Bracy Tucker Brown, (202) 429-8855, [email protected] BILL HEDDEN, Grand Canyon Trust, (928) 774-7488, [email protected] ERIC WESSELMAN, Sierra Club, (510) 622- 0290 ext. 240, [email protected] ROBERT GLENNON, University of Arizona, (520) 621-1614, [email protected] THE HONORABLE BOB WHELAN, Mayor, Lake Havasu City, Ariz., Chair of the Colorado River Regional Sewer Coalition, (928) 453- 4140, [email protected] BILL WALKER, Environmental Working Group, (510) 444-0973, [email protected]

FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO TAKE ACTION: WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/COLORADO2004.HTML

Colorado River ◆ 15 M ISSISSIPPI #2 Big Sunflower River

THREAT: WETLANDS DESTRUCTION AND RIVER DREDGING

Summary Mississippi River flyway. The Big Sunflower is A pair of costly flood control boondoggles pro- also home to one of the world’s most bounti- moted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ful native mussel beds and more than 50 threatens Mississippi’s Big Sunflower River. species of fish. The endangered pondberry, an Unless the Bush administration’s Environmen- exceptionally rare plant, is found along the tal Protection Agency (EPA) vetoes the Yazoo river. Pumps, this single project will drain and dam- Agriculture drives the region’s economy,

LOUIE MILLER age seven times more wetlands than all the and in recent decades farms have consolidated nation’s private developers harm in one year. into fewer and fewer hands. Soybeans and cot- Without firm opposition from EPA and the ton are the primary crops, but due to surplus- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the Army es they are profitable only with generous Corps will also dredge more than 100 miles of federal price supports. In a single county along the Big Sunflower’s riverbed, destroying even the river, just 359 recipients shared more than more wetlands, stirring up a toxic stew of pes- $73 million in federal crop subsi- ticides, and endangering the health of those dies from 1995 to 2002. who eat fish caught in the river. State and federal pub- lic lands in the Big The River Sunflower basin annually host The slow-moving Big Sunflower meanders hundreds of thou- through ecologically rich and sparsely populat-

sands of hunters, WILDLIFE SERVICE

ed lowlands of northwestern Mississippi. Near & birdwatchers, and

THE YAZOO PUMPS WOULD Vicksburg, the Big Sunflower joins the Yazoo FISH . S other visitors. . DRAIN AND DAMAGE 200,000 River, which soon after empties into the Mis- U ACRES OF CRITICAL WET- sissippi River. Despite extensive clearing for The Risk LANDS IN THE MISSISSIPPI agriculture, the Big Sunflower basin retains RIVER FLYWAY TO INCREASE vast wetland areas and bottomland hardwood The Army Corps proposes PRODUCTION OF SURPLUS forests that teem with wildlife and support to build the Yazoo Pumps, the largest CROPS. waterfowl and other migratory birds in the hydraulic pumping plant ever built, to siphon up to 6 million gallons of water per minute from the Big Sunflower basin. More than three years ago, EPA informed the Army Corps that the pumps would drain and damage 200,000 WILDLIFE SERVICE acres — 300 square miles — of productive & wetlands. This sacrifice would be made to FISH . S .

U intensify farming on marginal lands, and more than 80 percent of the pumps’ purported eco- nomic benefits would come from increased production of highly subsidized soybean and cotton crops. Even worse, an independent study revealed that the Army Corps has over- stated the project’s agricultural benefits by $144 million — more than 75 percent of the estimated $190 million cost to build the pumps. To boost the harvest of federal subsidy checks, the pumps would undo decades of effort and tens of millions of tax dollars spent protecting and restoring wetlands in the region. Wetlands that would be damaged include those in a national forest, in two

16 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 national wildlife refuges, and on private lands enrolled in the federally funded wetlands reserve program.

The Big Sunflower also is threatened by a WILDLIFE SERVICE $62 million Army Corps plan to dredge 104 & FISH . miles of riverbed, devastating instream habitat, S . destroying at least 43 percent of the river’s eco- U logically rich mussel beds, and damaging more than 3,600 acres of wetlands. Dredging will stir up a toxic stew of pesticides, including Dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT) and toxaphene, that has accumulated on the river bottom and endanger the health of low income and minority residents who regularly eat fish caught in the river. Despite the tremendous ecological losses and public health threats, dredging the Big Sunflower will not spare a single acre of land from flooding. It will merely reduce the fre- quency and duration of floods that will contin- ue to occur on 55,000 acres of floodplain Congress should decline to fund these FEDERAL AND STATE LANDS farmland. wasteful projects, and instead implement over- IN THE BIG SUNFLOWER Effective flood damage reduction can be due reforms of the Army Corps’ project plan- WATERSHED SUPPORT achieved at far less cost to taxpayers and the ning procedures when it takes up the Water DIVERSE RECREATIONAL environment through the purchase of conser- Resources Development Act during the 2004 OPPORTUNITIES. vation easements and targeted flood protection session. Congress should also pass the Clean for the few residences and businesses in the Water Authority Restoration Act in the 2004 FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO TAKE ACTION: area. session to ensure that wetlands and streams in WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/ BIGSUNFLOWER2004.HTML The 12-Month Outlook the headwaters of the Big Sunflower River will continue to be protected as they have been for The Army Corps is expected to recommend the last 30 years. that Congress fund construction of the Yazoo Pumps in an Environmental Impact Statement Contacts that may be finalized in fall 2004. The agency MELISSA SAMET, American is scheduled to take the first steps toward rec- Rivers, (415) 482-8150, ommending the dredging proposal in the next [email protected] 12 months, as well. These actions will provide LOUIE MILLER, Mississippi opportunities for other federal and state agen- Chapter of the Sierra Club, cies to exercise their authorities to stop these (601) 352-1026, destructive and expensive porkbarrel projects. [email protected] The Bush administration EPA should exer- DAVID CONRAD, National cise its authority under the Clean Water Act to Wildlife Federation, (202) veto the Yazoo Pumps. An EPA veto is amply 797-6697, [email protected] supported by the project’s extensive ecological CYNTHIA SARTHOU, Gulf damage, the availability of responsible alterna- Restoration Network, (504) tives to protect homes from flooding, and the 525-1528, cyn@gulfrestora- unjustifiable use of public funds. FWS should tionnetwork.org assert the Endangered Species Act and other authorities to the fullest extent to halt these projects. In addition, the state of Mississippi should deny the required Clean Water Act certifica- tions for both the Yazoo Pumps and dredging the Big Sunflower River.

Big Sunflower River ◆ 17 W YOMING, IDAHO, OREGON, WASHINGTON #3 Snake River

THREAT: FEDERAL DAMS

Summary create a hostile gauntlet of deadly turbines Dams on the Columbia and lower Snake and warm, stagnant reservoirs full of hungry rivers have caused dramatic declines in the predators that have caused dramatic declines Snake River’s once abundant wild salmon pop- in the Snake River’s salmon runs. It is now ulation, with all the river’s runs either extinct considered a good year if wild salmon returns or sliding toward extinction. Studies show reach 3 percent of their historical numbers. that local economies would benefit from thou- All the river’s salmon runs are either extinct TIM PALMER sands of new jobs and hundreds of millions of or threatened with extinction. new dollars if wild salmon were restored to In 2003, only two sockeye salmon returned the Snake River. However, unless the Bush to Idaho’s Redfish Lake, named after the sock- administration delivers a credible plan to eye’s spawning color. Aided by recent cyclical rebuild wild salmon populations, these eco- improvements in ocean conditions, other wild nomic opportunities will be lost and our gen- Snake River salmon and steelhead are not as eration could be the last to enjoy these close to extinction as the sockeye, but those legendary species. populations remain perilously small. Despite the grim situation, there is still The River hope for wild Snake River salmon. Quality habitat awaits salmon upstream of the dams Originating in Yellowstone National Park, the in the Snake River and in tributaries. Scien- Snake River arcs across southern Idaho before tists estimate that the Snake River basin pos- turning north along the Idaho-Oregon border. sesses roughly 70 percent of the salmon and The river then enters Washington and flows steelhead restoration potential in the entire west to the Columbia River. It is the Colum- Columbia basin. Removing the lower Snake bia’s largest tributary, and once produced more River dams would open up the salmon migra- salmon and steelhead than any other river in tion route between the sea and that quality WILD SNAKE RIVER SALMON the Columbia basin. habitat, and restore spawning beds. CONTAIN HEALTHY OMEGA-3 When Lewis and Clark canoed the lower OILS, BUT MOST RUNS ARE Snake River nearly 200 years ago, more than 2 The Risk TOO DEPLETED FOR COMMER- million wild salmon and steelhead returned CIAL HARVEST. FARM RAISED each year to spawn in the Snake and its tribu- Recent studies indicate that some farmed SALMON MAY CONTAIN PCBS taries. Four U.S. Army Corps of Engineers salmon contain high levels of polychlorinated AND OTHER TOXIC CHEMI- dams and 140 miles of slackwater behind biphenyls (PCBs) and other toxins, and should CALS AND SHOULD BE EATEN those dams have replaced the free-flowing be eaten sparingly. Conversely, wild salmon — SPARINGLY. river Lewis and Clark traveled. These dams thanks to their diet — are much healthier to eat because they contain more heart-friendly Omega-3 oils and lower concentrations of chemicals. While wild Snake River salmon, protected under the Endangered Species Act, won’t be a significant portion of many people’s diet anytime soon, restoring major salmon- producing rivers like the Snake is key to

AMERICAN RIVERS IMAGE LIBRARY ensuring that consumers have a sustainable source of wild salmon in the future. Despite the fact that scientists believe that removing the four lower Snake River dams would be the surest and best way to recover wild salmon in the Snake River basin, the fed- eral government’s 2000 Federal Salmon Plan did not call for dam removal. Many of the plan’s 200 actions have not been implemented and a federal court tossed it out in May of

18 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 2003, essentially deeming much of it wishful thinking. Snake River salmon are imperiled primarily because they must travel through eight dams on the Snake and Columbia rivers as they migrate to and from the ocean. The current S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS . Salmon Plan allows dams to kill up to 88 per- U cent of migrating juvenile salmon. Scientists agree that the plan’s reliance on transporting fish around the dams in trucks and barges will not lead to salmon recovery. The goal of the 2000 Salmon Plan was only to prevent extinction. This falls far short of the vision of Northwest governors, who have called for recovering salmon to sustainable, harvestable levels that satisfy federal laws and American Indian fishing rights guaranteed by treaties. Achieving abundant wild salmon runs would bolster local economies by adding a consistent sportfishing industry to the region. Contacts THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION A rare salmon angling season in 2001 generat- MICHAEL GARRITY, American Rivers, (206) SHOULD DELIVER A CREDIBLE ed $90 million in Idaho. Commercial and trib- 213-0330 ext.11, [email protected] PLAN TO RESTORE WILD al fishing would also benefit. Restoration of CHARLES HUDSON, Columbia River Inter- SNAKE RIVER SALMON RUNS Snake and Columbia river salmon runs could Tribal Fish Commission, (503) 731-1257, TO LEVELS THAT SUPPORT yield up to $500 million per year in revenues [email protected] RECREATIONAL AND COMMER- to the region and support up to 25,000 addi- BILL SEDIVY, Idaho Rivers United, (208) 343- CIAL HARVEST. tional family wage jobs. 7481, [email protected] The Army Corps estimates that in the LIZ HAMILTON, Northwest Sportfishing event that the Snake River dams were Industry Association, (503) 631-8859, removed, improved fishing would contribute [email protected] as much as $65.5 million to the regional econ- GLEN SPAIN, Pacific Coast Federation of Fish- omy and that recreation other than fishing ermen’s Associations, (541) 689-2000, would generate up to $310.5 million per year. [email protected] FOR MORE INFORMATION OR : NICOLE CORDAN, Save Our Wild Salmon, TO TAKE ACTION The 12-Month Outlook WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/ (503) 230-0421 ext.12, [email protected] SNAKE2004.HTML Under court order, the Bush administration must deliver a new salmon plan that satisfies the Endangered Species Act by mid-2004. The Bush administration should deliver a plan that is grounded in science and takes the bold steps necessary to truly recover salmon. The administration should either call for the removal of the lower Snake River dams or pro- vide evidence that recovery is possible with- out dam removal. Congress should pass the Salmon Planning Act (H.R. 1097). The bill would allow lower Snake River dam removal to be considered on an equal basis with other options, and it would help local communities maximize the benefits of dam removal, while minimizing negative effects. The Salmon Planning Act currently has over 100 co-sponsors in the U.S. House of Representatives.

Snake River ◆ 19 TENNESSEE, ALABAMA, MISSISSIPPI, KENTUCKY #4 Tennessee River

THREAT: INADEQUATE SEWER SYSTEMS

Summary February, 2002 near Sheffield, Ala., after a pipe Along the length of the Tennessee River, in the river burst during heavy rains. overloaded wastewater systems discharge City officials acknowledged that the city’s COM . large amounts of inadequately treated sewage wastewater infrastructure has been neglected into the river with distressing regularity. for decades, with some pipes dating to the Unless the Bush administration holds these 19th century, and at least one made from sewer systems accountable — and Congress wood. A few months later, torrential rains in HATTANOOGAFUN C provides financial assistance — the Tennessee Chattanooga, Tenn. overloaded the sewer sys- River will continue to be deluged with tem there, flushing raw sewage into area sewage. streets, where it created a health menace for area residents before flowing into the river, The River untreated. Unfortunately, such incidents are common The Tennessee River and its tributaries form all along the river, and they occur most often the fifth largest river system in the United in Knoxville. Within the past three years, the States, with a watershed covering 41,000 Knoxville Utility Board has violated Clean square miles. The Tennessee begins at the Water Act sewage regulations some 1,000 confluence of the Holston and the French times, dumping more than 1 billion gallons of Broad rivers in the heart of Knoxville, and raw or partially treated sewage into the river then flows 652 miles through four states and streams in Knoxville. A portion of this before it reaches the Ohio River at Paducah, dumped sewage results from permits illegally Kentucky. issued by the state of Tennessee that allow Like most large river systems in America, bypassing, a flagrant violation of the Clean the Tennessee River watershed has been Water Act. The Knoxville Utility Board is intensively developed. Nine dams plug the facing Clean Water Act lawsuits from conser- river, generating electricity and supporting vationists, the city, the state, and the federal commercial navigation from the Ohio River government for its sewage discharges into the all the way to Knoxville. According to the river. U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency more than three million pounds of toxic sub- (EPA) estimates that exposure to sewage-laced stances were discharged into Tennessee water makes as many as 3.5 million Ameri- waters in 2000. cans sick each year. Germs found in sewage Despite the abuse, the Tennessee River cause minor gastrointestinal illness and watershed is one of the most biologically respiratory infections as well as potentially diverse river systems in North America. RIGHT: OVERLOADED SEWER According to the World Wildlife Fund, the COM SYSTEMS SEND ALARMING Tennessee River and its tributaries are home . IC P AMOUNTS OF SEWAGE INTO to 125 species of freshwater mussels, 96 OCU THE TENNESSEE RIVER EVERY species of snails, and an astonishing 319 D YEAR. species of fish — including the legendary snail darter. The Risk Suburban sprawl and urban decay clash along the length of the Tennessee River, and the public is the loser as millions of gallons of raw or partially treated sewage are accidental- ly or deliberately discharged into the river each year. For example, 1 million gallons of raw sewage poured into the river in January and

20 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 life threatening illnesses like hepatitis and CHILDREN AND THE ELDERLY dysentery. ARE MOST VULNERABLE TO State efforts to address pollution in the GERMS IN UNTREATED river have lagged. PIRG reports that in 2002 SEWAGE. ILLNESSES RANGE the state of Tennessee ranked third in the FROM MILD RESPIRATORY nation, behind Utah and Texas, for the per- INFECTIONS TO FATAL CASES centage of its sewage and industrial facilities OF DYSENTERY AND HEPATI- falling into the “significant non-compliance” TIS. category under Clean Water Act obligations. Fish consumption advisories in 2000 totaled 17 in Tennessee, 13 in Alabama and six in Kentucky. The 12-Month Outlook In almost every instance, the difference between clean and sewage-laced water comes down to enforcing the law and providing the necessary funding. Two important decisions will be made in Washington, D.C. during the next 12 months that will determine whether the federal government will be part of the COM . IC

solution or part of the problem. P

For fiscal year 2005, the White House has OCU again proposed to slash the amount of money D in the “State Revolving Loan Funds” that EPA Contacts provides to local communities to improve JAMIE MIERAU their sewage and drinking water treatment , American Rivers, (202) 347- plants. The administration asked Congress to 7550 ext. 3003, [email protected] RENÉE HOYOS appropriate only $850 million, a reduction of , Tennessee Clean Water Net- almost half a billion dollars from current work, (865) 522-7007, [email protected] NELSON ROSS spending levels for this necessary program. , Tennessee Izaak Walton Congress should reject these proposed cuts League, (865) 523-3800, [email protected] ADAM SNYDER and increase funding for the effort to $3.2 bil- , Alabama Rivers Alliance, (205) 322-6395, [email protected] lion instead. FOR MORE INFORMATION OR JUDY PETERSEN, Kentucky Waterways TO TAKE ACTION: In November 2003, the Bush administra- .AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/ Alliance, Inc., (270) 524-1774, WWW tion’s EPA proposed to legalize the wastewater TENNESSEE2004.HTML utility practice of “blending” partially and [email protected] fully treated sewage and dumping the mix into rivers when rain or melting snow stresses their capacity. The agency accepted public comments through Feb. 9, 2004, and could issue a final decision at any time. Diluting sewage before dumping it is not an acceptable approach to protecting public health – germs breed in water. EPA should withdraw the pro- posal. The Knoxville Utility Board should stop adding new sewer connections to its sewage collection system, particularly those with chronic overflows, until they conduct the nec- essary repairs to sewer lines, pump stations, sewage treatment plants, and other parts of their sewer collection system to fully comply with the terms and conditions of the Clean Water Act.

Tennessee River ◆ 21 W EST VIRGINIA, PENNSYLVANIA, NEW YORK #5 Allegheny and Monongahela rivers

THREAT: POLLUTED DRAINAGE FROM ABANDONED COAL MINES

Summary The Risk Thousands of abandoned mines are leaking The Allegheny-Monongahela watershed con- acid and other toxic substances into streams tains the greatest concentration of abandoned throughout the coal country of western Penn- coal mine sites in the nation. In working sylvania and West Virginia. Unless Congress mines, miners pump out groundwater that reauthorizes the Abandoned Mine Land Trust would otherwise fill the shafts where they

ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Fund, ongoing efforts to treat this problem will work. When the mines are abandoned, the . S . U cease and the amount of pollution reaching the pumps are shut off and the mines slowly fill Allegheny and Monongahela rivers will with water that leaches acid and toxic materi- increase, threatening 42 public drinking water als from the coal left in the seam. Eventually, intakes, thousands of private wells, and fish contaminated water fills the mine and “aban- and wildlife. doned mine drainage” (AMD) begins to seep out into the streams and rivers. The Rivers Pennsylvania leads the nation in the The Allegheny and Monongahela rivers drain amount of polluted drainage seeping or flowing most of western Pennsylvania, and they merge from abandoned mines. Half of the Pennsylva- in downtown Pittsburgh to form the Ohio nia portion of the Allegheny-Monongahela River. Originating near the New York-Pennsyl- watershed has been assessed for water quality, vania state border, the Allegheny runs north to and already 2,188 miles of rivers and streams south. After an 86-mile reach protected as a have been classified as impaired due to mine federal Wild and Scenic River, the Allegheny drainage. Many tributaries run orange, blue or passes through a series of nine Army Corps of white because seepage and runoff from aban- Engineers locks and dams before meeting the doned mines carry high concentrations of Monongahela. The Monongahela runs south to heavy metal wastes, such as iron, aluminum north, starting in West Virginia’s mountains, and manganese. It has been estimated that it and flowing through farmland and small towns will cost $780 million to clean up abandoned mines in western Pennsylvania. THE ALLEGHENY AND MONON- before entering Pittsburgh. On the Allegheny, Monongahela and Ohio GAHELA RIVERS COME TOGETH- These rivers were workhorses of early rivers in Pennsylvania there are 42 public ER IN PITTSBURGH AFTER American industrialization. Coal-laden barges drinking water intakes, and each is vulnerable DRAINING THE COAL COUNTRY serving steel mills regularly traveled on both to pollution threats from AMD. Other human OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA of them. With the decline of the domestic steel impacts include damage to thousands of pri- AND WEST VIRGINIA. industry, many mills closed. Pittsburgh, how- ever, remains a vate wells and shrinking property values. AMD major inland port, can also cause fish kills, wipe out aquatic handling 53 mil- insects and destroy aquatic habitat. It jeopar- lion tons of cargo dizes recreational activities such as fishing, each year. In addi- boating and park use along the Allegheny, tion, the water- Monongahela and Ohio rivers, uses that have ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

. been valued at nearly $115 million dollars S

. ways are now U emerging as annually. increasingly Coal mining was largely unregulated until important recre- 1977, and most owners of defunct mines have ational resources, long since disappeared. Of the nearly 1,200 attracting more abandoned coal mines in the West Virginia por- than six million tion of the Allegheny-Monongahela watershed, tourists annually. only 11 mines are served by water treatment projects. Many of the untreated mines are fill- ing with water and will soon send additional AMD into surface water. The management and maintenance of existing and future water treat-

22 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 ment operations at bankrupt and abandoned mining operations hinges on congressionally appropriated funding. WPCAMR The 12-Month Outlook Pennsylvania Governor Edward Rendell pro- posed a major bond initiative for environmen- tal restoration in January 2004. If approved, the BOTH PHOTOS THIS PAGE state would borrow $800 million for aban- doned mine cleanup, open space protection, clean energy, and other uses. The Pennsylvania legislature should vote to put the bond on the ballot for voters to ratify in November 2004. The federal Abandoned Mine Land Trust Fund pays for cleanup efforts at many aban- doned mine sites. This program col- lects monies from DEB SIMKO COUNTLESS HEADWATER operating coal , Western Pennsylvania Coalition mines to fund for Abandoned Mine Reclamation, STREAMS IN THE WATERSHED reclamation and (724) 837-5271, [email protected] ARE DISCOLORED BY ACID D WOODWELL treatment projects AVITT , Pennsylvania Environ- AND TOXIC HEAVY METALS at closed mines. mental Council, (412) 481-9400, LEAKING OUT OF ABANDONED The fund currently [email protected] MINES (LEFT). K PITZER has a balance — but it EITH , Friends of the Cheat River, will expire on Sept. 30, (304) 329-3621, [email protected]

2004. If allowed to lapse, the loss of funding FOR MORE INFORMATION OR would hobble efforts by states such as Pennsyl- TO TAKE ACTION: WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/ vania and West Virginia to reclaim abandoned ALLEGHENYMONONGAHELA coal mines and protect water in the Allegheny- 2004.HTML Monongahela watershed, and rivers like the Allegheny and Monongahela would be devas- tated by mine drainage indefinitely. Congress should reauthorize the coal indus- try’s contribution to the fund before this hap- pens, and make certain that monies in the fund are directed toward water quality prob- lems caused by AMD. Even if the Abandoned Mine Land Trust Fund is reauthorized, it may not generate enough funds to thoroughly address AMD damage. Thousands of mine cleanups are required, each lasting up to 50 years. Congress should do more than reauthorize the existing program — it should increase the amount of funding available for cleanups and reform the process for allocating money to ensure that more cleanups are completed more quickly. Contacts SARA NICHOLAS, American Rivers, (717) 232- 8355, [email protected]

Allegheny and Monongahela rivers ◆ 23 IDAHO, WASHINGTON #6 Spokane River

THREAT: WATER WITHDRAWALS AND POLLUTION

Summary ery, whitewater recreation and dramatic, More pollution concentrated in less water natural scenery. will be the future of the Spokane River unless new groundwater withdrawal applications are The Risk rejected, sewage plants meet stringent water Spokane Falls, the city’s signature natural fea- quality standards, and mine waste is cleaned ture, sputters and runs dry most summers, a up. consequence of over-pumping the Spokane- Rathdrum Aquifer, the operations of Avista The River Corporation’s Post Falls Dam, and diverting The Spokane River flows from Lake Coeur the river above the falls to Avista’s Spokane d’Alene in northern Idaho approximately 90 power plant. miles northwest through Spokane, Wash., Every gallon pumped out of the Spokane- before emptying into the Columbia River Rathdrum Aquifer is one less gallon that above Grand Coulee Dam. Much of the river’s reaches the river. Water users are authorized to flows, particularly during summer, come from pump more than 620 million gallons per day underground springs fed by the Spokane-Rath- from the aquifer, a figure that exceeds the drum Aquifer. The importance of this aquifer river’s recent daily flow during summer. to the river and the region is hard to overstate. State agencies in Idaho and Washington that It also provides drinking water to 400,000 manage the aquifer have carelessly deeded people in the Spokane area, and is liberally water to cities, farmers and industry without pumped by irrigators in Idaho, and industrial adequately assessing ecological impacts on the and municipal users in Washington. river. This generosity has fueled wasteful For 10,000 years, native peoples gathered at habits — per capita water use in the region is among the highest in the nation. LUB

C Shrinking river flows exacerbate another

IERRA serious problem: five sewage treatment plants S discharge into the river. Low flows concentrate the wastewater discharges, making it difficult for utilities to avoid violating water quality standards. Rather than upgrade their facilities, these utilities are seeking exemptions from regulations. The final insult to the Spokane River is LL PHOTOS THESE PAGES COURTESY

A toxic pollution flowing from the area around Lake Coeur d’Alene. Former mining and lead smelting operations there have contaminated the river with heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, zinc, and cadmium that cause health problems, including brain and nerve damage in children. High pollution levels have prompted fish consumption warnings in Washington. In 1999, the Spokane River carried mine waste including 400 tons of lead and other metals THE SPOKANE RIVER: TOO a magnificent set of falls and rapids to catch and arsenic to the Columbia River. LITTLE WATER, TOO MUCH salmon and trade with their neighbors. In the In 2002, the Environmental Protection POLLUTION, AND AN UNCER- 1870s, the river’s abundant water and energy Agency (EPA) issued a cleanup plan TAIN FUTURE potential attracted new settlers to this spot. for the Spokane River-Lake Coeur d’Alene Today, the Spokane River is a vital part of the basin. The contaminated lake, the river’s quality of life in its namesake city, offering source, is not in the plan. The Bush adminis- riverfront trails and parks, a prized trout fish- tration transferred effective control of the

24 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 cleanup to Idaho, which opposes the designa- LUB tion and the cleanup because of costs, opposi- C IERRA

tion by mining interests, and because local S business leaders fear negative publicity for the area’s real estate and tourism industry centered on Lake Coeur d’Alene. Continued funding is in doubt due to shortfalls in the federal Super- fund program that is supposed to help pay for the project. LL PHOTOS THESE PAGES COURTESY

The 12-Month Outlook A Idaho and Washington are determining future pumping levels for the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer, and will release final plans in 2004. Simultaneously, the states are working with the U.S. Geological Survey to study the aquifer and river. The states should enact a moratori- um on new aquifer pumping until the study is concluded, and include stringent conservation provisions in forthcoming aquifer management plans. The Washington Department of Ecology will pays” funding source expired in 1995, leading to FIVE SEWAGE TREATMENT issue a river cleanup plan in 2004, establishing the current funding crisis for the program. PLANTS ALONG THE SPOKANE standards to Despite opposition from President Bush, Con- RIVER ARE SEEKING EXEMP- address low oxy- gress should reauthorize the tax to ensure that TIONS FROM CLEAN WATER gen levels in the cleanup of the Spokane River and other sites STANDARDS. river. At the nationwide goes forward — and polluters rather same time, the than taxpayers pay for cleanup. Bush administra- tion has signaled Contacts that it may ROSS FREEMAN, American Rivers, (206) 213- FOR MORE INFORMATION OR greatly reduce TO TAKE ACTION: 0330 ext. 16, [email protected] the federal role WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/ JOHN OSBORN, Sierra Club, (509) 939-1290, SPOKANE2004.HTML in this important [email protected] Clean Water Act JUSTIN HAYES, Idaho Conservation League, program. Washington state and the federal gov- (208) 345-6933, [email protected] ernment should continue to work together to reduce polluted runoff in the Spokane River. Spokane River sewage dischargers are seek- ing exemptions from water quality standards that protect spawning conditions for trout. Their tool to accomplish this is a Clean Water Act provision called “use attainability analy- sis.” If accepted, the exemptions will allow sewage to be dumped more liberally, and trout survival is less likely. Public hearings about the exemption requests will be held in late 2004 and in 2005. The Washington Department of Ecology and the federal EPA must reject these requests from sewage dischargers. In the 2004 session of Congress, lawmakers should reinstate the Superfund Tax on oil and chemicals that provides funds to clean up toxic sites like the Spokane River. This “polluter

Spokane River ◆ 25 , CONNECTICUT #7 Housatonic River

THREAT: MASSIVE PCB POLLUTION

Summary The Risk Irresponsible industrial activity has left the Between 1932 and 1977, GE used PCBs at its floodplain and river bottom of the Housatonic electric transformer manufacturing plant in River contaminated with some of the highest Pittsfield, Massachusetts. During that time, levels of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in GE either deliberately or accidentally dis- the nation. People who consume contaminat- charged or dumped many tons of PCBs into ed fish and wildlife from along the river are at the river, nearby lakes, groundwater, and onto elevated risk for cancer, birth defects, and soils and landfills. The GE facility is the only ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY immune problems. Unless the Environmental known source of these chemicals entering the Protection Agency (EPA) orders a cleanup of Housatonic in the state. the remaining contamination, General Electric PCBs cause a Company's (GE) toxic legacy in the Housaton- wide range of ic will remain a major health hazard for gener- human health ations to come. problems, often at low EPA The River levels of The Housatonic River flows 149 miles from exposure. its source in western Massachusetts through EPA classifies western Connecticut before emptying into a PCBs as a proba- large tidal estuary and . ble human carcino- Along its route the river passes through Octo- gen. Other studies link ber Mountain State Forest, Massachusetts's PCBs to developmental and neurological disor- largest state park. The Housatonic supports 45 ders and endocrine disruptions. species of fish and amphibians as well as Estimates on the amount of PCBs contami- nating the river and surrounding area vary. GE ALTHOUGH THE HOUSATONIC numerous rare and endangered species includ- has acknowledged discarding almost 20 tons RIVER REMAINS A POPULAR ing bald eagles. of PCBs into the river. The Housatonic River RECREATIONAL DESTINATION, For 200 years, the Housatonic has provided Initiative, citing information provided by a PEOPLE CONSUMING FISH water and hydropower for paper, manufactur- former GE employee, pegs the number at close AND WATERFOWL FROM THE ing, iron ore and marble industries, as well as to 750 tons. The most severe concentrations RIVER CAN BE UP TO 1,000 for agriculture. Despite warnings against con- of the chemical — among the highest in the TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BE suming fish caught in the river, the Housaton- nation — are found in the sediment at the bot- STRICKEN WITH CANCER AND ic is a popular destination for trout fishing, tom of the river between the Pittsfield facility OTHER MALADIES. boating, camping and swimming. and Woods Pond Dam about 10 miles down- stream. Although this dam has prevented large COM . quantities of PCBs from moving further down- stream, the river contains dangerous levels of PCBs below the dam all the way to its mouth. PCBs do not dissolve in water; they sink to CLARKEOUTDOORS the bottom and enter the food chain through plants and bottom-feeding species. Ducks taken from the most polluted section of the Housatonic contain PCB levels rarely seen anywhere else in the world. Average PCB con- centrations in these waterfowl are more than 200 times EPA's tolerance level for human consumption, and their carcasses must be handled as hazardous waste. One duck regis- tered a PCB count of 3,700 parts per million, more than 1,000 times the EPA limit. EPA also concluded that certain popula-

26 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 along theHousatonicwillcontinue tobepro- would ensurethatalltributaries andwetlands and aren'tprotectedbyfederal law. This to endlingeringdebateover whatwatersare Authority RestorationActin the2004session of adverseimpactstotheirhealth. dents toonceagainhuntandfishwithoutfear the restofriversufficienttoenableresi- entire river. EPA shouldinsistonacleanupof ranging fromdoingnothingtodredgingthe addressing theremainingcontamination— for present theagencywithsixalternatives bytheendof2004. reports to newareas.EPA shouldfinalizethese could causethecontaminationto“migrate” examines whetherriverflowandweather impacts tofishandwildlife,thethird human health,thesecondlooksatPCB discusses theeffectsofriver'sPCBson plete threescientificanalyses:Thefirstreport rest oftheHousatonicRivertocleanup. of theremainingPCBcontaminationin howmuch,ifany,steps towardsdetermining In thecomingmonths,EPA willtakemajor The 12-MonthOutlook site. the factory cleanup onthenext1.5milesofriverbelow in 2002.GEisalsorequiredtohelppayfor side thePittsfieldfactory. Thiswascompleted stretch oftheHousatonicimmediatelyalong- the settlementledtocleanupofhalf-mile suedGE,and 1997, thefederalgovernment maladies, suchasreproductiveproblems.In likely tobestrickenwithcancerandother ly abovethedam,areupto1,000timesmore especial- Housatonic Riverfishandwaterfowl, fowl. aboutconsumingHousatonicwater- advisory years later, andin1999thatstateaddedan followedinMassachusettsfive lar warning sumption offishfromtheHousatonic.Asimi- Public Healthissuedadvisoriesforthecon- percent ofthemhavedevelopedabnormalities. studiesindicatethatasmany50 tory est PCBlevelsinthenation,andEPA labora- dam. Fishintheriverhavesomeofhigh- tain areasoftheriver, especiallyabovethe mammals andbirdsareallathighriskincer- amphibians,fish-eating tions ofinvertebrates, Congress shouldpasstheCleanWater arecompleted,GEwill Once thesereports Before makingthisdecision,EPA willcom- The EPA foundthatpeopleconsuming of In 1977,theConnecticutDepartment Water Actbecamelawin1972. tected astheyhavebeensincetheClean J Contacts A (413) 243-3353,[email protected] T 7550 ext.3056,[email protected] [email protected] Action League,(860)672-6867, OHN IM UDREY G RAY S ENN C , HousatonicRiverInitiative, OLE , AmericanRivers,(202)347- , HousatonicEnvironmental Housatonic River ◆ 27 ACSE UTB HAN BE MUST CARCASSES THE OF SECTION POLLUTED MOST UA CONSUMPTION HUMAN OETHAN MORE D HOUSATONIC WWW ACTION TAKE TO F WASTE HAZARDOUS AS DLED EPA' PCB RMR NOMTO OR INFORMATION MORE OR CSTKNFO THE FROM TAKEN UCKS H . ECMR FOR BENCHMARK S EESREACHING LEVELS AMERICANRIVERS UAOI CONTAIN OUSATONIC 200 2004. : TIMES HTML . T . ORG HEIR - / .

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY F LORIDA #8 Peace River

THREAT: PHOSPHATE MINING

Summary drinking water every day. The river is also an Phosphate mining in the Peace River water- important source of economic vitality, provid- shed has been the source of serious environ- ing tourism, recreation, and commercial fish- mental problems for many years, and large ing. During 1995-1996, these industries new mines are planned. Florida’s Department generated almost $4.5 billion and created of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the more than 91,000 jobs in the watershed. Southwest Florida Water Management Dis- trict (SWFWMD) must take measures to safe- The Risk ENVIRONMENTAL PR GROUP guard the river and communities in the Phosphate is a growing export to China, where watershed from mining impacts, including it is used in fertilizer, but the consequences of protecting drinking water, and important mining it are borne in the Peace River water- tourism and commercial fishing industries. shed. Phosphate mining companies bore and scrape huge pits up to 60 feet deep over thou- The River sands of contiguous acres. More than 180,000 The Peace River begins in central Florida at acres have been mined in the Peace River Green Swamp and flows south 105 miles to watershed already, and mining corporations the Charlotte Harbor Estuary. Fresh water are now seeking permits for another 100,000 from the Peace River is vital to maintain the acres – an expansion of more than 50 percent. delicate salinity balance in the estuary that One byproduct of the extraction process is hosts several endangered species as well as clay, which is stored in settling ponds that commercial and recreational harvests of eventually comprise more than 40 percent of a shrimp, crabs and fish. mine site. Some of these ponds can measure The river has always been a vital resource thousands of acres. Rain is trapped in these to the people in its watershed. Historically, massive clay-laden ponds rather than soaking the abundant fishery and wildlife supported into the soil to replenish underlying . Native American populations. Today, the This reduces flows in the Peace River. Since Peace is an important source of drinking the 1960s, the average annual flow of the mid- water, supplying some 6 million gallons of dle Peace River has declined from 1,350 cubic feet per second (cfs) to 800 cfs. Most of this HUGE PHOSPHATE MINES ARE flow reduction is due to phosphate mining. DEVOURING THE PEACE Each holding pond is a potential time bomb RIVER WATERSHED, LEAVING that threatens water quality, public health, BEHIND UNSTABLE CLAY wildlife and the regional economy. Dams POOLS THAT PREVENT WATER restraining the ponds have burst or over- FROM REACHING THE RIVER

ENVIRONMENTAL PR GROUP flowed, sending a slurry of clay, containing — UNTIL THEY COLLAPSE. uranium and radium, into the river, and coat- ing the riverbed for many miles with a toxic clay slime that suffocates flora and fauna. One such incident killed 3 million fish. In 1971, two million gallons of phosphate waste swept into the river, causing a five-foot tide of slime that spread into adjacent pastures and wet- lands. On some occasions, clay slime spills have prevented the Peace River Manasota Water Supply Authority from using river flows for drinking water, forcing counties to seek water supplies elsewhere or rely on stored supplies. On at least 24 occasions, heavy rains have created sinkholes beneath the settling ponds.

28 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 This caused the floor of the ponds to collapse, UREAU B S allowing mine waste to be released into '

underground aquifers. ISITOR V The 12-Month Outlook OUNTY C On May 10, 2004, a judge will examine the Florida DEP’s decision to allow IMC-Cargill to HARLOTTE expand the Ona Mine by 4,000 acres. The C company has signaled that it may expand the site by an additional 16,000 acres beyond that at some point in the future. Charlotte County, the Peace River Manasota Water Supply Authority and conservation groups are chal- lenging the DEP’s permit for the mine. It appears DEP is poised to allow mine construc- tion, despite the fact that an Environmental Impact Statement has not been completed for this project. DEP should reject the Ona Mine. Charlotte County and conservation groups Contacts PHOSPHATE MINING are challenging or monitoring at least five SERENA S. MCCLAIN, American Rivers, THREATENS RECREATIONAL other phosphate mine proposals. These pro- (202) 347-7550 ext. 3004, AND COMMERCIAL FISHING posed mines and mine expansions total over [email protected] IN THE PEACE RIVER AND 40,000 acres. DEP should deny permits for HONEY RAND, Charlotte County Commis- CHARLOTTE HARBOR each of them. sion, (813) 948-6400, [email protected] After a three-year delay, SWFWMD is BECKY AYECH, Environmental Federation of scheduled to set new minimum flow levels for Southwest Florida, (941) 322-2164 the middle and lower Peace River in 2004. DENNIS MADER, HARDCAP, (863) 494-4687, The large number of pending mine permits [email protected] and their consequences for flows make it GLENN COMPTON, ManaSota-88, (941) 966- imperative that SWFWMD set minimum flow 6256, [email protected] levels without further delay. The district should set minimum flows in the Peace River FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO TAKE ACTION: that will preserve and protect drinking water WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/PEACE2004.HTML and fish and wildlife habitat. If SWFWMD attempts additional stalling, the state legisla- ture should mandate that the decision be made in 2004. Most of the Peace River was listed under the Clean Water Act as an impaired river in 1998, and the DEP has agreed to develop a cleanup plan for the river. DEP should resist pressure from phosphate mining companies and establish clean water management requirements that will lead to improved water quality in the river. The Bush administration has halted a Clin- ton-era initiative to strengthen the Total Max- imum Daily Load program in the Clean Water Act and has signaled that it will propose weaker regulations. The administration should not dilute this program, which is the Clean Water Act’s primary tool for cleaning up waters like the Peace that are impaired by development, mining, and other land uses that generate pollution.

Peace River ◆ 29 OHIO #9 Big Darby Creek

THREAT: RAPID, POORLY REGULATED SPRAWL Summary Despite its close proximity to Columbus, Ohio, Big Darby Creek has managed to escape many impacts of urban sprawl. That may be about to change. Unless state and local gov- ernments adopt and enforce river-conscious COPYRIGHT JIM MURTHA land use planning in the Big Darby watershed, one of the highest quality streams left in the

COPYRIGHT JIM MURTHA Midwest may become just another polluted, flood-prone urban ditch. The River The Big Darby Creek mainstem is approxi- mately 88 miles long, draining 555 square miles of predominantly agricultural land in encroaching into sensitive areas as a leading central Ohio before joining the Scioto River. concern. Once parking lots, roads, rooftops, The Big Darby system has been recognized and turf grass occupy a sufficient percentage as one of the outstanding rivers left in the of any given watershed, increased stormwater Midwest. It has been designated as a state runoff ruins the natural dynamics of local and national “Scenic River,” and as one of streams. Rain and snow that once soaked into The Nature Conservancy’s original “Last the ground race into storm drains instead — Great Places.” causing more floods and more pollution. Although most lands along the Big Darby Columbus residents now drawn to the Big are in private hands, several parks provide Darby for its scenery and tranquility could public access. The river is a popular destina- find their experience diminished by more pol- tion for paddlers, anglers, scout troops and lution, trash on shorelines, unnaturally rising school outings from the greater Columbus or falling flows, and traffic noise drowning out area. More than 100 fish and 43 freshwater singing birds and rippling waters. The Big mussels species, including 37 rare and endan- Darby’s collection of rare and endangered gered aquatic species on Ohio’s watch lists, mussels and fish are particularly vulnerable to have been identified in the Big Darby water- the disruptions in natural flows that result shed. Three species protected under the feder- from the dramatic changes in runoff associat- al Endangered Species Act call the Big Darby ed with poorly planned sprawl. home. The Bush administration has relaxed feder- The Risk Until recent years, agriculture buffered the Big Darby from sprawl, but skyrocketing property values threaten to transform the landscape. Although some farming practices present risks DARBY CREEK ASSOCIATION to the Big Darby, a more pressing concern is that population in the seven-county Colum- bus area is expected to explode by nearly 30 percent — some 600,000 people — by 2030. As a result, Columbus and other communities are rezoning agricultural land and entertaining THE BIG DARBY IS ONE OF proposals for massive residential development THE HIGHEST QUALITY in the Darby watershed. STREAMS LEFT IN THE MID- River conservationists across the country WEST — FOR NOW. have identified poorly planned sprawl

30 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 al safeguards that once helped protect rivers like the Big Darby from unregulated sprawl. In January 2002, the U.S. Army Corps of Engi- neers issued a new set of “Nationwide Per-

mits” that will make it easier and cheaper for DARBY CREEK ASSOCIATION developers to build residential subdivisions, shopping malls and institutional structures in floodplains and on top of wetlands and streams. Starting last year, field staff from the Army Corps and federal Environmental Pro- tection Agency were discouraged from invok- ing Clean Water Act protections for certain classes of wetlands that absorb stormwater and filter pollutants that might otherwise flow into rivers like the Big Darby. Because most wetlands in the watershed have already MORE THAN 100 FISH AND been destroyed, those that do remain are espe- most crucial areas along the river, as well as 43 FRESHWATER MUSSEL cially necessary for flood control and water steps to ensure that the construction which SPECIES, INCLUDING 37 cleansing purposes. does occur uses “low impact development” These federal actions put more of the bur- techniques to minimize stormwater runoff to RARE AND ENDANGERED OHIO'S den of protecting the Big Darby on the shoul- the Big Darby. Ohio EPA and the towns and AQUATIC SPECIES ON ders of state agencies and local governments counties in the watershed should act to make WATCH LISTS HAVE BEEN BIG — and real estate developers have a lot of such a vision a reality. IDENTIFIED IN THE DARBY WATERSHED. ABOVE clout in Ohio. According to the Center for In the 2004 session of Congress, lawmakers -ENDAN- Responsive Politics, the real estate industry is should put to rest lingering questions about IS THE FEDERALLY . the state’s third-most generous political con- what waters and wetlands are protected by GERED CLUBSHELL MUSSEL tributor. Developers and growth boosters are federal law. Congress should pass the Clean pressuring the state to allow development in Water Authority Restoration Act to ensure sensitive areas before thoughtful, protective that remaining wetlands in the Big Darby planning can take place. watershed are protected. Should they prevail, the health and water Contacts quality of the Big Darby will decline, its JACK HANNON, American Rivers, (202) 347- FOR MORE INFORMATION OR wildlife will suffer, and area residents will lose : 7550 ext. 3025, [email protected] TO TAKE ACTION the opportunity to enjoy a remarkable river, WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/ JOHN TETZLOFF 2004.HTML included in the National Wild and Scenic , Darby Creek Association, BIGDARBY Rivers System, only 20 minutes from down- (614) 288-0313, [email protected] ANTHONY SASSON town Columbus. , The Nature Conservancy, (614) 717-2770 ext. 23, [email protected] The 12-month outlook Recognizing the threats to the Big Darby, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) imposed a temporary development mora- torium in June 2003 in a portion of the Big Darby watershed. The agency created a stake- holder group comprised of conservation groups, political leaders, government agencies, developers, and private utilities to recommend stream quality protection measures for the Big Darby. The stakeholder group will present their recommendations by the end of 2004, starting a formal period of public notice and comment. These recommendations have the potential to include zoning, development limits and other land use guidelines that will protect the

Big Darby Creek ◆ 31 MINNESOTA, WISCONSIN, ILLINOIS, IOWA, MISSOURI, KENTUCKY, TENNESSEE, ARKANSAS, MISSISSIPPI, LOUISIANA #10 Mississippi River

THREAT: NAVIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE, LEVEES, AND POLLUTION

Summary The Risk After decades of manipulation by the U.S. With its focus on managing the Mississippi for Army Corps of Engineers, the Mississippi navigation and flood control, the Army Corps River is beset with problems. Unless Congress has profoundly altered almost everything gives the agency marching orders that reflect about the river — its course, depth, flow, the needs, desires and opportunities of today’s floodplain, and wildlife. Among the casualties: communities, the river faces ecological col- more than half the river’s floodplain has been lapse with vast negative economic impacts to cut off by levees, millions of acres of wetlands JON STRAVERS tourism and recreation industries worth $21 and countless side channels and sandbars have billion per year. been destroyed or damaged, the number of marsh plants at the base of the river’s food The River chain have been reduced, sedimentation and On its journey from Minnesota to the Gulf of erosion have increased, and fish and mussel Mexico, the Mississippi River drains 41 per- habitat has been destroyed. cent of the continental United States, and car- Riverside communities that look to ries more water than any other American tourism and recreation as key industries suffer river. The river also provides drinking water as the river deteriorates. for millions of people. Every year, more than 20 square miles of The Mississippi is a cultural and recre- coastal wetlands near the river’s mouth are ational treasure for the nation. Tourism, fish- lost because sediment that once nourished the ing and recreation generate about $21.4 billion Mississippi’s delta is funneled through a tight each year, and contribute 351,000 jobs along corridor of Army Corps flood control levees the river. The river also supports a $12.6 bil- into the Gulf of Mexico. Pollution from farms THE ARMY CORPS WANTS TO lion shipping industry, with 35,300 related and sewage plants is also swept down the river EXPAND ITS LOCKS jobs. Half the nation’s corn and soybeans are where it contributes to an 8,000-square-mile UPSTREAM OF ST. LOUIS, barged on the Upper Mississippi. “dead zone” in the Gulf of Mexico — an area WASTING BILLIONS OF TAX The river and its floodplain support more that can’t support marine life. DOLLARS AND FURTHER than 400 different species of wildlife, and The Army Corps continues to undermine JEOPARDIZING THE HEALTH some 40 percent of North America’s water- recovery efforts by pursuing more of the same OF THE RIVER. fowl migrate along the river’s flyway. types of projects that have caused wildlife extinctions and brought the river to the brink of ecological collapse. Even though less expen- sive and less environmentally damaging alter- natives are available, the agency proposes to spend more than $2 billion to replace or extend many of its 29 locks above St. Louis.

ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Two separate findings by the National Acade- . S .

U my of Sciences show that the agency’s barge traffic forecasts for the river are grossly over- stated and its economic models supporting the lock project are flawed. Although billions of dollars have already been spent constructing flood control mea- sures along the river, flood damages are on the rise — damages in 1993 alone exceeded $12 billion. Now the Army Corps wants to spend and build more. One example, the proposed $85 million St. Johns Bayou/New Madrid levee and pump project in southeastern Mis- souri, would wall off more than 75,000 acres

32 ◆ America’s Most Endangered Rivers of 2004 EARLY AND ADVANCED ERO- SION: LEVEES AT THE RIVER’S MOUTH HELP CAUSE MORE THAN 20 SQUARE MILES OF COASTAL WETLANDS TO DISAP- PEAR EACH YEAR. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS . S . U

of floodplain along the river. The enormous for coastal Louisiana, and that plan should be FOR MORE INFORMATION OR TO TAKE ACTION: earthen levees and dikes that line much of the submitted to Congress. WWW.AMERICANRIVERS.ORG/ river increase flood damages by inviting resi- Finally, Congress should enact long overdue MISSISSIPPI2004.HTML dences, businesses, and farms to locate in reforms in Army Corps’ project planning pro- flood prone areas, and sever the vital connec- cedures. Among other key reforms, indepen- tion to the river needed to sustain backwaters, dent peer review of the economic and forests, wetlands and the river’s wildlife. ecological assessments of large or controversial Army Corps projects should be required. The 12-Month Outlook This spring, the Senate will take up the Water Contacts Resources Development Act of 2004. In this KELLY MILLER, American Rivers, (202) 347- bill, Congress will direct the Army Corps to 7550 ext. 3008, [email protected] either perpetuate or begin to fix problems SCOTT FABER, Environmental Defense, (202) afflicting the Mississippi River. 387-3500 ext. 3315, sfaber@environmentalde- The Army Corps will likely try to have it fense.org both ways, presenting lawmakers with a MARK BEORKREM, Illinois Stewardship multi-billion dollar, 30-year wish list for lock Alliance, (217) 498-9707, and dam renovations wrapped in a grand — [email protected] but vague — commitment to restore the eco- MARK MULLER, Institute logical functions of the Upper Mississippi for Agriculture and Trade River. The agency’s economic justifications Policy, (612) 870-3420, for longer locks have been thoroughly discred- [email protected] ited. Congress should decline this wasteful ANGELA ANDERSON, Mis- expenditure, and authorize simpler, less-costly sissippi River Basin measures such as traffic scheduling and helper Alliance, (314) 776-6672 boats to relieve periodic lock congestion. ext.102, angelaander- Congress should also direct the Army [email protected] Corps to conduct a study to determine how to DAN MCGUINESS, operate the existing lock and dam system to National Audubon Soci- improve the ecological health of the river, and ety, (651) 739-9332, to develop a clear and binding plan to do so. [email protected] Congress should immediately fund the Lower Mississippi River Resources Assess- ment that will help to identify and prioritize restoration opportunities for the lower river. Congress should direct the Army Corps to immediately acquire and restore floodplain land, accelerate dam reforms to provide lower summer flows, and fund side channel restora- tion along the lower river. Congress also should urge the Army Corps to quickly com- plete a comprehensive delta restoration plan

Mississippi River ◆ 33

A MERICAN RIVERS 1025 Vermont Avenue, NW Suite 720 Washington, DC 20005

PHONE: (202) 347-7550 TOLL FREE: 877-4RIVERS [email protected] www.AmericanRivers.org AOL Keyword: American Rivers

N ORTHWEST REGIONAL OFFICE

SEATTLE PORTLAND 4005 20th Avenue West 320 SW Stark Street Suite 221 Suite 418 Seattle, WA 98199 Portland, OR 97204 PHONE: (206) 213-0330 PHONE: (503) 827-8648 [email protected] [email protected]

C ALIFORNIA FIELD OFFICES

WATER RESOURCES PROGRAMS DAM AND HYDROPOWER PROGRAMS 6 School Street 409 Spring Street Suite 200 Suite E Fairfax, CA 94930 Nevada City, CA 95959 PHONE: (415) 482-8150 PHONE: (530) 478-5672 [email protected] [email protected]

N ORTHEAST FIELD OFFICE MID-ATLANTIC FIELD OFFICE 20 Bayberry Road 105 N. Front St. Glastonbury, CT 06033 Suite 220 PHONE: (860) 652-9911 Harrisburg, PA 17101 [email protected] PHONE: (717) 232-8355 [email protected]

M ONTANA FIELD CONSULTANT NEBRASKA FIELD OFFICE 215 Woodland Estates 6512 Crooked Creek Drive Great Falls, MT 59404 Lincoln, Nebraska 68516 PHONE: (406) 454-2076 PHONE: (402) 423-7930 [email protected] [email protected]

S OUTH DAKOTA FIELD OFFICE SOUTHEAST FIELD OFFICE P.O. Box 1029 1807 Taft Highway Aberdeen, SD 57402 Suite 7-D PHONE: (605) 229-4978 Signal Mountain, TN 37377 [email protected] [email protected]