DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resources of Massachusetts (-G---+

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resources of Massachusetts (-G---+ Water Resources of Massachusetts (-G---+ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4144 Prepared in cooperation with the ’ ~ALTHOF.~SSACHUSETTS . DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, DIVISION 6~ WATER RESOURCES WATER RESOURCES OF MASSACHUSETTS By Alison C. Simcox U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 90-4144 Prepared in cooperation with the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, DMSION OF WATER RESOURCES Boston, Massachusetts 1992 i . L U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can he write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Bldg 8 10 Massachusetts - Rhode Island District Box 25425 28 Lord Rd., Suite 280 Denver, Colorado 80225 Marlborough, MA 01752 . -1 CONTENTS Page Abstract ..................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................. 1 PurposeandScope ......................................................... 1 Physiographic setting ....................................................... 2 Glacialhistory ............................................................. 2 Geohydrologic setting .......................................................... 2 Hydrologiccycle .............................................................. 4 Surfacewater ............................................................. 4 Groundwater ............................................................. 8 Stratified-drift aquifers .................................................. 8 Bedrockaquifers ....................................................... 8 Wateruse ................................................................... 9 Waterquality ................................................................ 10 Surfacewater ............................................................. 10 Groundwater ............................................................. 11 Stratifieddrift.. ....................................................... 11 Bedrock .............................................................. 12 Crystalline bedrock .................................................. 12 Sedimentarybedrock ................................................ 12 Carbonate bedrock .................................................. 13 Sources of contamination .................................................... 13 Water-resourcesmanagement ................................................... 14 River basins in Massachusetts .................................................. 16 MerrimackRiverbasin ...................................................... 16 NashuaRiverbasin ..................................................... 16 Surfacewater ...................................................... 18 Groundwater ...................................................... 20 ConcordRiverbasin .................................................... 20 Surfacewater ...................................................... 21 Groundwater ...................................................... 23 ShawsheenRiverbasin .................................................. 23 Surfacewater ...................................................... 24 Groundwater ...................................................... 24 MerrimackRiverbasin .................................................. 24 Surfacewater ...................................................... 26 Groundwater ...................................................... 26 CoastalRiverbasins.. ...................................................... 28 ParkerRiverbasin ..................................................... 28 Surfacewater ...................................................... 28 Groundwater ...................................................... 31 IpswichRiverbasin ..................................................... 31 Surfacewater ...................................................... 32 Groundwater ...................................................... 32 . 111 < . _.’ ,. / :,B CONTENTS (Continued) Page North Coastal basin .................................................... 34 Surfacewater ...................................................... 34 Groundwater ...................................................... 34 Boston Harbor (Mystic River) basin ........................................ 34 Surfacewater ...................................................... 36 Groundwater ...................................................... 36 CharlesRiverbasin ..................................................... 38 Surfacewater ...................................................... 40 Groundwater ...................................................... 40 Boston Harbor (Neponset, Weymouth and Weir Rivers) basin .................. 40 Surfacewater ...................................................... 41 Groundwater ...................................................... 43 South Coastal (North and South Rivers) basin ............................... 43 Surfacewater ...................................................... 44 Groundwater ...................................................... 44 South Coastal (South Coastal Shore) basin .................................. 44 Surfacewater ...................................................... 46 Groundwater ...................................................... 46 BuzzardsBaybasin ..................................................... 46 Surfacewater ...................................................... 46 Ground water ...................................................... 49 Cape Cod and the Islands ................................................ 49 Surfacewater ...................................................... 50 Groundwater ...................................................... 50 Taunton River basin .................................................... 53 Surfacewater ...................................................... 54 Groundwater.....: ................................................ 56 BlackstoneRiverbasin .................................................. 56 Surface water ...................................................... 57 Groundwater ...................................................... 59 Ten Mile River and Narragansett Bay and Mount Hope Bay Shore basins ........ 59 Surfacewater ...................................................... 60 Ground water ...................................................... 60 ThamesRiverbasin ........................................................ 63 French and Quinebaug River basins ....................................... 63 Surfacewater ...................................................... 65 Groundwater ...................................................... 65 ConnecticutRiverbasin ..................................... ............... 67 MillersRiverbasin ..................................................... 67 Surface water ...................................................... 69 Ground water ...................................................... 69 DeerfieldRiverbasin ................................................... 71 Surfacewater ...................................................... 71 Groundwater ...................................................... 73 Chicopee River basin .................................................... 73 Surfacewater ...................................................... 76 iv CONTENTS (Continued) Page Groundwater ...................................................... ‘76 Westfield and Farmington River basins .................................... 76 Surfacewater ...................................................... 79 Groundwater..............................................., ...... 79 Connecticut River basin ................................................. 80 Surfacewater ...................................................... 81 Groundwater ...................................................... 81 HousatonicRiverbasin ...................................................... 83 HousatonicRiverbasin .................................................. 85 Surfacewater ...................................................... 85 Groundwater ...................................................... 85 HudsonRiverbasin ......................................................... 87 HoosicRiverbasin ...................................................... 87 Surfacewater ...................................................... 87 Groundwater ...................................................... 89 Summary ................................................................... 89 Referencescited .............................................................. 91 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Physiographical provinces and subdivisions in Massachusetts . 3 2-4. Maps showing: 2. Average annual precipitation in Massachusetts . 5 3. Average annual runoff in Massachusetts . 6 4. Location of planning basins in Massachusetts . , 7 5. Graph showing average instantaneous discharge as a function of drainage area for selected streamflow-gaging stations in Massachusetts with 20 or more years of continuous record. 9 6. Photograph showing the Connecticut River, Deerfield, Massachusetts . 15 7. Map showing location of Massachusetts planning basins within the MerrimackRiverbasin. 17 8-11. Maps showing location of principal streams and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment for the Industri-Plex Superfund Site Town of W Oburn, Middlesex County, Massachusetts
    Rest oration Plan and Environmental Asses sment for the Industri-Plex Superfund Site Draft for Public Review February 19, 2020 Prepared by: Industri-Plex NRDAR Trustee Council Commonwealth of Massachusetts U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration With support from: Abt Associates 6130 Executive Boulevard Rockville, MD 20852 Abt Associates Report Title Insert Date ▌1-1 This page intentionally left blank Industri-Plex RP/EA February 19, 2020 ▌i CONTENTS CONTENTS List of Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. vi 1. Introduction to the Restoration Plan and Environmental Assessment ..................... 1 1.1. Trustee Responsibilities and Authorities ................................................................. 1 1.2. Summary of Industri-Plex NRDAR Settlement ........................................................ 2 1.3. Summary of Natural Resource Injuries ................................................................... 2 1.4. Purpose and Need for Restoration .......................................................................... 4 1.5. Restoration Goals ...................................................................................................4 1.6. Coordination and Scoping ....................................................................................... 4
    [Show full text]
  • RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL HISTORICAL OUTLINE 1989-1990: Lieutenant Governor's Task Force on Rivers, Final Report & Recommendations, 58 Pages, February, 1990
    RHODE ISLAND RIVERS COUNCIL HISTORICAL OUTLINE 1989-1990: Lieutenant Governor's Task Force on Rivers, Final Report & Recommendations, 58 pages, February, 1990. 1991-2000: Governor Bruce Sundlun inaugurated January 1, 1991. General Assembly created RI Rivers Council (RC) – RI General Law 46-28. Kenneth Payne became RC chair. Statewide Planning Program provides staff support to RC. RC concluded in 1992 that "more effective integration of existing programs and authority for rivers is needed." RC formulated draft classifications for rivers in 1993. RC held four workshops in northern, central, southern and eastern RI in 1994 to refine draft river classifications. Governor Lincoln Almond inaugurated January 1, 1995. Michael Cassidy, Planner for the City of Pawtucket, became RC chair. RC, working with the Divison of Planning, created digital maps of the state's watersheds. The State Planning Council adopted the RI Rivers Policy and Classification Plan, in January 1998, as State Guide Plan Element 162. RC established policies for recognizing local watershed councils in 1998. The Blackstone, Saugatucket and Wood-Pawcatuck were first river systems to have watershed councils designated by RC. Note: Designated watershed councils have certain legal authority and standing to represent their water bodies in state and local jurisdictions as well as be eligible for state grants via RC. 2001-2007: Meg Kerr became RC chair. General Assembly commences in 2001 providing annual legislative grants to RC from $22,000 to $52,000 range. Annual grant rounds commence from RC to designated local watershed councils generally in $2,500 to $7,500 range from Fiscal Year 2002 to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations
    Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Fore River Watershed Mystic River Watershed Neponset River Watershed Weir River Watershed Project Number 2002-02/MWI June 30, 2003 Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Project Number 2002-01/MWI June 30, 2003 Report Prepared by: Ian Cooke, Neponset River Watershed Association Libby Larson, Mystic River Watershed Association Carl Pawlowski, Fore River Watershed Association Wendy Roemer, Neponset River Watershed Association Samantha Woods, Weir River Watershed Association Report Prepared for: Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy Herzfelder, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Robert W. Golledge, Jr., Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Cynthia Giles, Assistant Commissioner Division of Municipal Services Steven J. McCurdy, Director Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Project Number 2002-01/MWI July 2001 through June 2003 Report Prepared by: Ian Cooke, Neponset River Watershed Association Libby Larson, Mystic River Watershed Association Carl Pawlowski, Fore River Watershed Association Wendy Roemer, Neponset River Watershed Association Samantha Woods, Weir River Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • Preserve Cape Cod to Association
    Association to Preserve Cape Cod Association to Preserve Cape Cod, Inc. 2011 Annual Report P.O. Box 398, 3010 Main Street Barnstable, MA 02630 Never Forgotten & Still Making a Difference Maggie Geist retired as executive director of the Association to Preserve Cape Cod in 2011. For a dozen years, Maggie steered our organization over many challenges and established her reputation as both a passionate environmentalist and a creative businesswoman. Capewind, county government reform, the Cape Cod Water Resources Restoration Project, the Upper Cape Water Supply Reserve on 15,000 acres of the Massachusetts Military Reservation, the No Discharge Area designation for Cape Cod Bay and, most of all, clean water were all positively impacted by her proactive style. She is still working with APCC developing a regional wastewater plan. Maggie led APCC and lives her life by the creed instilled upon her by her mom: “Leave the world a better place than you found it.” In her honor, the board of directors established the Geist Internship. The Geist Internship is intended to be a perpetual fund established to permit APCC to help train the next generation of environmental scientists, planners, engineers and creative thinkers. Each summer APCC will hire a promising college student to work on a project to help preserve Cape Cod. The fund is over one third the way toward being a self-perpetuating dedicated fund for this purpose. Member generosity, especially from current and past board members, made this possible. Programs & Projects Marine Invasive Species Monitoring: Over the past decade, many non-native marine plants and animals have arrived in coastal waters, often out- competing local species.
    [Show full text]
  • Views of the Blackstone River and the Mumford River
    THE SHlNER~ AND ITS USE AS A SOURCE OF INCOME IN WORCESTER, AND SOUTHEASTERN WORCESTER COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS By Robert William Spayne S.B., State Teachers College at Worcester, Massachusetts 19,3 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Oberlin College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Geography CONTENTS Ie INTRODUCTION Location of Thesis Area 1 Purpose of Study 1 Methods of Study 1 Acknowledgments 2 II. GEOGRAPHY OF SOUTHERN WORCESTER COUNTY 4 PIiYSICAL GEOGRAPHY 4 Topography 4 stream Systems 8 Ponds 11 Artificial 11 Glacial 12 Ponds for Bait Fishing 14 .1 oJ Game Fishing Ponds 15 Climatic Characteristics 16 Weather 18 POPULATION 20 Size of Population 20 Distribution of Population 21 Industrialization 22 III. GEOGRAPHICAL BASIS FOR TEE SHINER INDUSTRY 26 Recreational Demands 26 Game Fish Resources 26 l~umber of ;Ponds 28 Number of Fishermerf .. 29 Demand for Bait 30 l IV. GENERAL NATURE OF THE BAIT INDUSTRY 31 ,~ Number of Bait Fishermen 31 .1 Range in Size of Operations 32 Nature of Typical Operations 34 Personality of the Bait Fishermen 34 V. THE SHINER - ITS DESCRIPTION, HABITS AND , CHARACTERISTICS 35 VI. 'STANDARD AND IlIIlPROVISED EQUIPMENT USED IN .~ THE IhllUSTRY 41 Transportation 41 Keeping the Bait Alive 43 Foul Weather Gear 47 Types of Nets 48 SUCCESSFUL METHODS USED IN NETTING BAIT 52 Open Water Fishing 5'2 " Ice Fishing 56 .-:-) VII. ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE SHINER INDUSTRY ~O VIII. FUTURE OUTLOOK FOR THE SHINER INDUSTRY 62 IX. BIBLIOGRAPHY 69 x. APPENDIX 72 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Following Page .
    [Show full text]
  • Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY Concord River, Massachusetts Talbot Mills Dam Centennial Falls Dam Middlesex Falls DRAFT REPORT FEBRUARY 2016 Prepared for: In partnership with: Prepared by: This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY – DRAFT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Purpose The purpose of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of restoring populations of diadromous fish to the Concord, Sudbury, and Assabet Rivers, collectively known as the SuAsCo Watershed. The primary impediment to fish passage in the Concord River is the Talbot Mills Dam in Billerica, Massachusetts. Prior to reaching the dam, fish must first navigate potential obstacles at the Essex Dam (an active hydro dam with a fish elevator and an eel ladder) on the Merrimack River in Lawrence, Middlesex Falls (a natural bedrock falls and remnants of a breached dam) on the Concord River in Lowell, and Centennial Falls Dam (a hydropower dam with a fish ladder), also on the Concord River in Lowell. Blueback herring Alewife American shad American eel Sea lamprey Species targeted for restoration include both species of river herring (blueback herring and alewife), American shad, American eel, and sea lamprey, all of which are diadromous fish that depend upon passage between marine and freshwater habitats to complete their life cycle. Reasons The impact of diadromous fish species extends for pursuing fish passage restoration in the far beyond the scope of a single restoration Concord River watershed include the importance and historical presence of the project, as they have a broad migratory range target species, the connectivity of and along the Atlantic coast and benefit commercial significant potential habitat within the and recreational fisheries of other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Processes Influencing the Transport and Fate of Contaminated Sediments in the Coastal Ocean-Boston Harbor and Massachusetts
    26 Section 4: Oceanographic Setting By Bradford Butman, Richard P. Signell, John C. Warner, and P. Soupy Alexander The ocean currents in Massachusetts Bay mix and time because of the complex bathymetry and coastal transport water and material in the bay, and exchange geometry, and because of the multiple processes (for water with the adjacent Gulf of Maine. The currents example wind, river runoff, and currents in the Gulf of can conceptually be separated into tidal currents (which Maine) that drive the flow and change seasonally. fluctuate 1–2 times each day), low-frequency currents The oceanography of Massachusetts Bay may caused by winds and river runoff (which typically be conceptually separated into four seasonal intervals fluctuate with a period of a few days), and a residual (following Geyer and others, 1992) based on the wind current (steady over a few weeks). Field observations and surface waves (fig. 4.1); the temperature and thermal (Butman, 1976; Geyer and others, 1992; Butman and stratification of the water column (fig. 4.2); the salinity, others, 2004a; Butman and others, 2006) and simulations salinity stratification, and horizontal salinity gradients of the currents by numerical hydrodynamic models (for caused by river discharge (fig. 4.3); and the density example Signell and others, 1996; Signell and others, 2000) provide descriptions of the flow pattern, strength, stratification, which results from the temperature and and variability of the currents. Field observations salinity distribution (fig. 4.4). From November through provide measurements of the currents at selected March (winter), the water column is vertically well- locations during specific periods of time, whereas model mixed, and the wind and surface waves are the largest of simulations provide a high-resolution view of the often the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy - WORKING DRAFT
    Metro Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy - WORKING DRAFT - Funding provided by the Federal Sustainable Communities Program and the Barr Foundation Revised June 2015 By: Metropolitan Area Planning Council 60 Temple Place Boston, MA 02111 617.933.0700 www.mapc.org With assistance from: Tellus Institute 11 Arlington St. Boston, MA 02116 Acknowledgements This report was originally produced in June 2014 by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council, and revised on June 1 , 2015 after discussion and approval by the MAPC Executive Committee. Technical assistance was provided by Martin Pillsbury, Environmental Director (Project Manager); Julie Conroy, Senior Environmental Planner (Primary Author); Sam Cleaves, Senior Regional Planner (Author); Bill Wang, GIS Analyst; and Barry Keppard, Public Health Division Manager; James Goldstein, Senior Fellow, Tellus Institute; and William Dougherty, President, Climate Change Research Group. Editing and continued guidance was provided by Marc Draisen, MAPC Executive Director. The Metro-Boston Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (RCCAS) was undertaken with funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Sustainable Communities Program and the Barr Foundation. We would also like to thank the MAPC Officers for their continued support: Lynn Duncan, President; Keith Bergman, Vice President; Shirronda Almeida, Secretary; and Taber Keally, Treasurer. Special appreciation goes to the members of the RCCAS Advisory Committee for their continuous assistance and leadership: John Bolduc Environmental Planner Cambridge Community Development Dept. Wayne Castonguay Executive Director Ipswich River Watershed Assoc. Hunt Durey Acting Director MA Dept. of Ecological Restoration Kwabena Kyei-Aboagye MA Urban Program Manager U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Audubon Annual Report 2020
    2020 Annual Report Contents Cover Photo: Arcadia Wildlife Sanctuary Volunteer 01 Letter from the President & Board Chair 02 Fiscal Year 2020 Highlights 03 A Pivotal Pandemic 04 Successes Across the State 08 Land Conservation Summary Fiscal Year 2020 11 Supporters 17 Mass Audubon Board of Directors 2020 18 Mass Audubon Wildlife Sanctuaries, Nature Centers, & Museums Mass Audubon protects more than 38,000 acres of land throughout Massachusetts, saving birds and other wildlife, and making nature accessible to all. As Massachusetts’ largest nature conservation nonprofit, we welcome more than a half million visitors a year to our wildlife sanctuaries and 20 nature centers. From inspiring hilltop views to breathtaking coastal landscapes, serene woods, and working farms, we believe in protecting our state’s natural treasures for wildlife and for all people—a vision shared in 1896 by our founders, two extraordinary Boston women. Today, Mass Audubon is a nationally recognized environmental education leader, offering thousands of camp, school, and adult programs that get over 225,000 kids and adults outdoors every year. With more than 135,000 members and supporters, we advocate on Beacon Hill and beyond, and conduct conservation research to preserve the natural heritage of our beautiful state for today’s and future generations. We welcome you to explore a nearby sanctuary, find inspiration, and get involved. Learn how at massaudubon.org. Stony Brook Wildife Sanctuary The value and beauty of nature was on full display in 2020. As the global pandemic closed doors, more people than ever sought refuge outdoors, witnessing firsthand nature’s healing powers. Mass Audubon responded to this extraordinary time with passion, creativity, adaptability, and a singular focus on delivering on our mission, which has never been more important.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: References
    CHAPTER 9: REFERENCES Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). 1970. New England Division. Small Navigation Project - New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor, Massachusetts - Detailed Project Report. ------. 1988. Wetland Study Report for the New Bedford Superfund Site. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division. Prepared by IEP, Inc., Final Report. ------. 1990. New Bedford Harbor Superfund Pilot Study. Evaluation of Dredging and Dredged Material Disposal. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New England Division. May 1990. Bartlett, M. 1997. Letter to Jack Terrill dated February 12, 1997. Battelle Memorial Institute. 1990. Modeling of the Transport, Distribution, and Fate of PCBs and Heavy Metals in the Acushnet River/New Bedford Harbor/Buzzards Bay System. Volume I. Final Report. Contract No. 4236-MOD-0019 to EBASCO Services, Inc. Belding, D.L. 1909. A Report Upon the Mollusk Fisheries of Massachusetts. Boston: Wright and Potter. ------. 1912. A Report upon the Quahog and Oyster Fisheries of Massachusetts. Division of Marine Fisheries. ------. 1912. A Report upon the Alewife Fisheries of Massachusetts. Division of Fisheries and Game. Bellmer, R. J. 1988. The infaunal community of a polychlorinated biphenyls polluted harbor, New Bedford, Massachusetts, USA. Waltham, MA: ACOE New England Division. Bigelow, H. B., & Schroeder, W. C. 1953. Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. Washington: USGPO. Boss, J. A. and J. D. Thomas, 1983. New Bedford - A Pictorial History. The Donning Company. Norfolk, VA. Brady, Phillip, Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries, Sandwich Laboratory. Personal communication to James Turek, VHB Inc., 1996. Buzzards Bay Project. 1991. Buzzards Bay Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. Cardin, S.X., A.B. Howe, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Harbor South Watersheds 2004 Assessment Report
    Boston Harbor South Watersheds 2004 Assessment Report June 30, 2004 Prepared for: Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Prepared by: Neponset River Watershed Association University of Massachusetts, Urban Harbors Institute Boston Harbor Association Fore River Watershed Association Weir River Watershed Association Contents How rapidly is open space being lost?.......................................................35 Introduction ix What % of the shoreline is publicly accessible?........................................35 References for Boston Inner Harbor Watershed........................................37 Common Assessment for All Watersheds 1 Does bacterial pollution limit fishing or recreation? ...................................1 Neponset River Watershed 41 Does nutrient pollution pose a threat to aquatic life? ..................................1 Does bacterial pollution limit fishing or recreational use? ......................46 Do dissolved oxygen levels support aquatic life?........................................5 Does nutrient pollution pose a threat to aquatic life or other uses?...........48 Are there other water quality problems? ....................................................6 Do dissolved oxygen (DO) levels support aquatic life? ..........................51 Do water supply or wastewater management impact instream flows?........7 Are there other indicators that limit use of the watershed? .....................53 Roughly what percentage of the watersheds is impervious? .....................8 Do water supply,
    [Show full text]
  • The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-56 The Acushnet River Restoration Project: Restoring Diadromous Populations to a Superfund Site in Southeastern Massachusetts J.J. Sheppard1, S. Block2, H.L Becker3, and D. Quinn4 1Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries South Shore Field Station 1213 Purchase Street, 3rd Floor New Bedford, MA 02740 2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Restoration Center 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 3EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc 221 Sun Valley Boulevard, Suite D Lincoln, NE 68528 4DQ Engineering 11 Hickory Lane Walpole, MA 02081 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Department of Fish and Game Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Technical March 2014 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Series Managing Editor: Michael P. Armstrong Technical and Copy Editor: Elaine Brewer The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Reports present information and data pertinent to the management, biology and commercial and recreational fisheries of anadromous, estuarine, and marine organisms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and adjacent waters. The series presents information in a timely fashion that is of limited scope or is useful to a smaller, specific audience and therefore may not be appropriate for national or international journals. Included in this series are data summaries, reports of monitoring programs, and results of studies that are directed at specific management problems. All Reports in the series are available for download in PDF format at: http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dmf/publications/technical.html or hard copies may be obtained from the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Ave., Gloucester, MA 01930 USA (978-282-0308).
    [Show full text]