Section 4 Environmental Inventory & Analysis ` Town of Northborough Open Space and Recreation Plan – 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Section 4 Environmental Inventory & Analysis ` Town of Northborough Open Space and Recreation Plan – 2020 SECTION 4 ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY & ANALYSIS ` TOWN OF NORTHBOROUGH OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN – 2020 A - Geology, Soils, and Topography The US Department of Agriculture, Soil The Paxton-Woodbridge-Canton soils are very Conservation Service, has defined eleven deep, nearly level to steep soils that are drained and moderately well-drained on uplands. general soil types, of these, six can be found in Chatfield-Hollis soils are moderately deep and Northborough. The predominant types are well- shallow, gently sloping to moderately steep soils drained soils on slopes of less than 15%. Others that are well drained or somewhat excessively in order of quantity are poorly drained bog drained on uplands. soils, moderately well drained soils with less than Table 4.1 details each soil area's limitations for 15% slopes, some with greater than 15% slopes development with acreage and percentages of and poorly drained mineral soils. Table 4.1 lists each found in Northborough. Approximately the general types with their respective acreages. 40% of the Town (Soil Area 4) is characterized The Surficial Geology shows three predominant by soils capable of supporting residential, soil groups, sand and gravel, till or bedrock and commercial or industrial land uses without flood plain alluvium. These correspond to the extensive modifications. These soils are generally three types of soil, which are predominant in capable of supporting on-site septic systems for town. disposal of sanitary waste. Where public sewers The Soil Conservation Service has mapped three are available, lands falling within other soil dominant soil types in the Town of Northborough. types become somewhat more suitable for commercial, industrial and high-density The Hinckley-Merrimac-Windsor soils are very deep, nearly level to steep soils that are residential use. Approximately 75% of the excessively drained and somewhat excessively Town's soils are capable of supporting drained on outwash plains. agriculture, while 100% are suitable for recreational and woodland uses. Table 4.1 - Soil Limitations for Development Soil Commer- Acreage % High Density Industrial Agricultural Recreation Wood-land Group Residential cial 1 810.3 8 Severe Severe Severe Severe Slight Slight 2 2,592.1 25.6 Severe Severe Severe Slight Slight Slight 3 1,161.9 11.5 Severe Severe Severe Severe Slight Slight 4 3,928.9 38.8 Slight Slight Slight Slight Slight Slight 7 889.6 8.8 Severe Severe Severe Slight Slight Slight 9 735.4 7.3 Severe Severe Severe Severe Slight Slight (Central Massachusetts Regional Planning District, USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1965) 27 SOILS & GEOLOGIC FEATURES OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN Source: Data provided by the Town **Location data contained in this datalayer are nd LEGEND of Northborough, CMRPC, massDOT based on MassDEP staff interpretation of o and the Office of Geographic information provided by PRPs and their LSPs. P Information (MassGIS), Point features in this datalayer should ONLY be Town Boundaries Major Road Commonwealth of Massachusetts, considered as an ”approximation” or “best Gates Information Technology Division. estimate” of site locations based on the Water Bodies Local Road information submitted to the MassDEP BWSC. Information depicted on this map is Streams TON N The accuracy and completeness of the BERLIN ON for planning purposes only. This LI information submitted has not been verified by Prime Farmland information is not adequate for legal *# AUL Location* MassDEP. ! HUDS boundary definition, regulatory Soils (NRCS Soils- OYLS ----Description From MassGIS website interpretation, or parcel-level analysis.BER B MassDEP Tier 21E WORC. NE) See the MassGIS data layer description page N Use caution intrepreting positional *#! HUDSO accuracy. for full data disclaimer. Sites** http://www.mass.gov/mgis/c21e.htm NRCS SSURGO-Certified495 Soils (WORC. NE) Data current as of 10/2019 ¨¦§ MARLBOROUGH (Dominant Drainage Class) ¨¦§495 Excessively Moderately well IN drainedL drained R BERLIN ROUGH D Somewhat Poorly drained R BE *#! H T excessively I Very poorly M S drainedARLBO M drained MARLBORO N L Well drained E C R O Not Classified O 290 O ¨¦§ O L M I D G E ¨¦§290 * The DEP Oil or Hazardous Materials Sites with Activity C GREEN S I T R S and Use Limitation (AUL) datalayer is a statewide point Y F R E O dataset containing the approximate location of oil or T N D T R S I H B hazardous material release/disposal sites where an AUL N W N E Y S O T L has been filed. The sites mapped in this datalayer T R R E D W H represent only a subset of the total reported release sites T E C B N S A tracked by MassDEP BWSC. B D C LL ST R RDST NA O A A MAY D B R C An AUL provides notice of the presence of oil and/or W C K EE H O W B C hazardous material contamination remaining at the H S I O R O RD O DA location after a cleanup has been conducted pursuant to L D D O GO Chapter 21E and the MCP. BOYLSTON M D R m O --Description From MassGIS website OOT RD N 90 BEARF rvoir 2 T TE 290 P http://www.mass.gov/mgis/aul.htm. A ¨¦§ S O BALL ST C Milha R O N E Y Data current as of 10/2019 T L D Rese ST IN E BU ST N R RN R ¤£20 E T E I D IAG S W R H T E 0 R RD R A W ¤£20 B C LL HI TATE 29 D R KD R INTERS W A T N E MOH TO ST S S T D N O AVE S TLEP O EWER R IT O W N N L BR U D 290 O ¨¦§ B R R T E RICE S *# D D H ! E OIR C R D N 290 V S H S U O S E ¨¦§ ER T UR T C T S C N A H A E H N O R S I E T W A M T 290 T ¨¦§ U N H P IR D S N C UT L O LLEN T A E W S D T MAI L S N ST S WINTE T EA H R R ST HER A A E MARL IS V O F R M D D F FA L ST R S O W C Y LN AIN *# C H T ! A M UR K R C H S BOROUGH C NISC T CASTLE RD N I E R N D O T Y T A T CH A ¤£20 S W M URCH ST R R LE A IV T P T S *# E A P ! T P R L S L E M EA L S SA C N T NT T R S E S Y S IE T E P T R S BARTLET W R ST L T E AN T ST F E L R *# D S R H N ! *# I C ! D *#! D A R R GALE G L E Y N E COL M M K ST ST M N R A IN N L U I D t L S W N IN IR ERAV D et C G l S U E R A BRI T C S R G N VE T I Bart Pond A A R HA L K S S W D L A T C M N E O F R P I O AB H S C O A S I S A D O T E N R V A M O D E D E T L BE H O E N S RIN E S E Y H S A O A A T J E CA DIX S M T A T T L V N W W R D R Y D AVE E T D R D NB N S R S A T J H C E R U D R E F B O O B R I R H O B IL I L C K L E L H R A E R D T R *#! D D *# ¤£20 Little WES!T MAIN ST SHREWS DA ncy VI Chau L S S ¬135 YM T « Pond A N S SUNS T RUTH ET D D R S D R R OU R D D E L TH S BU AT E HG I T F L *# R R ! O TE T RY N CHES O NG F WESTBOROUGH D D NR EL W TO R R LO L D I N £20 M ¤ O A S S I I H V F D A E F A D V Chaunc O M ST A T DAVIS U C TOMBLIN THAYER y T Lake Y S ST A HILL RD E W W S H T P U O O H I S T N S D S R IA DOW D E N MEA C N E O R T W I S A A R L S V A LON D T *#! «¬9 *# ONT ! BELM ST MONT BEL ST *#! «¬30 «¬9 «¬135 *#! *#! ! WEST ¤£20 *# SHREWSBURY *# ! BOROUGH ! *#! ^_ *#! Miles rvoir 0.550.275 0 0.55 1 Mercantile Street, Suite 520 AssabetRiver Worcester, MA 01608 Rese ® Town of Northborough, Massachusetts Date: 10/24/2019 Document Path: H:\Projects\O_Northborough_GIS\Subprojects\m215_osrp\osrp215_04_Soils_11x17.mxd ` TOWN OF NORTHBOROUGH OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN – 2020 Of note, Mt. Pisgah is composed of bedrock with mafic gneiss. Mixed in are marble, garnets, and a layer of glacial till. As you progress to the top white sillimanite crystals, indicating that the rocks of Mt.
Recommended publications
  • Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY
    Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY Concord River, Massachusetts Talbot Mills Dam Centennial Falls Dam Middlesex Falls DRAFT REPORT FEBRUARY 2016 Prepared for: In partnership with: Prepared by: This page intentionally left blank. Executive Summary Concord River Diadromous Fish Restoration FEASIBILITY STUDY – DRAFT REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Purpose The purpose of this project is to evaluate the feasibility of restoring populations of diadromous fish to the Concord, Sudbury, and Assabet Rivers, collectively known as the SuAsCo Watershed. The primary impediment to fish passage in the Concord River is the Talbot Mills Dam in Billerica, Massachusetts. Prior to reaching the dam, fish must first navigate potential obstacles at the Essex Dam (an active hydro dam with a fish elevator and an eel ladder) on the Merrimack River in Lawrence, Middlesex Falls (a natural bedrock falls and remnants of a breached dam) on the Concord River in Lowell, and Centennial Falls Dam (a hydropower dam with a fish ladder), also on the Concord River in Lowell. Blueback herring Alewife American shad American eel Sea lamprey Species targeted for restoration include both species of river herring (blueback herring and alewife), American shad, American eel, and sea lamprey, all of which are diadromous fish that depend upon passage between marine and freshwater habitats to complete their life cycle. Reasons The impact of diadromous fish species extends for pursuing fish passage restoration in the far beyond the scope of a single restoration Concord River watershed include the importance and historical presence of the project, as they have a broad migratory range target species, the connectivity of and along the Atlantic coast and benefit commercial significant potential habitat within the and recreational fisheries of other species.
    [Show full text]
  • Here Is No Visitor Center Located on Winterberry Hunting on Sundays
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge 680 Hudson Road Sudbury, MA 01776 978/562 3527 978/562 3627 fax Assabet River http://www.fws.gov/refuge/assabet_river Federal Relay Service National Wildlife for the deaf and hard-of-hearing 1 800/877 8339 Refuge U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service http://www.fws.gov Trail and Recreation For Refuge Information Guide 1 800/344 WILD July 2015 NT OF E TH TM E R I A N P T E E R D I . O S R . U M A 49 RC H 3, 18 Welcome! Located along a portion of the which is headquartered out of Great Assabet River, Assabet River Meadows NWR and located at 73 National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) is Weir Hill Road in Sudbury. one of more than 562 refuges in the National Wildlife Refuge System. For more information about Assabet This blue goose, The refuge is approximately 20 miles River NWR go on-line to http://www. designed by J.N. west of Boston in portions of the fws.gov/refuge/assabet_river, or visit “Ding” Darling, has towns of Hudson, Maynard, Stow the Friends of Assabet River NWR at become the symbol of www.farnwr.org. the National Wildlife and Sudbury. It consists of several Refuge System separate pieces of land: a 1,900-acre northern section, a 300-acre southern The refuge is open from sunrise section, and 91 acres scattered along to sunset. Wildlife-dependent the Assabet River in Stow. The main recreation opportunities, including entrance to the refuge and the refuge wildlife observation, photography, visitor center is at 680 Hudson Road interpretation, and environmental in Sudbury.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers Developing a Report Card Stakeholder Workshop Newsletter Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge February - March 2018
    The Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers Developing a Report Card Stakeholder Workshop Newsletter Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge February - March 2018 Watersheds As part of the landscape that saw the start of both Assabet River Watershed LOWELL the American revolution and the industrial revolution, Concord River Watershed TEWKSBURY Sudbury River Watershed the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers in Streams CHELMSFORD Massachusetts have a long history of use and abuse. Designated Wild & Scenic Restoring the health of these three interconnected Massachusetts BILLERICA WESTFORD r rivers has been the mission of OARS, the watershed e CARLISLE Riv d organization for the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord or c n LITTLETON o Rivers, for 31 years. Restoration takes many years of C BOXBOROUGH BEDFORD committed work by local communities and support ACTON from many sources. Effective actions depend on HARVARD a sound understanding of the science and the local context, which must be broadly understood STOW CONCORD and communicated. BOLTON MAYNARD LINCOLN CLINTON BERLIN In 2018, OARS partnered with the Integration and SUDBURY r HUDSON WAYLAND Rive Application Network, University of Maryland Center et ab ss A for Environmental Science to initiate a river report BOYLSTON WESTON card for the region. The report card will provide a MARLBOROUGH snapshot of current river conditions and the historical NORTHBOROUGH FRAMINGHAM trends and context of those conditions. NATICK WESTBOROUGH SOUTHBOROUGH To start the process, two workshops were held at SHREWSBURY Sudbury River HOPKINTON Great Meadows National Wildlife Refuge on 28 ASHLAND SHERBORN February and 1 March 2018, with key stakeholders GRAFTON from all three river basins. The initial workshop elicited UPTON what stakeholders value about the rivers, and the 10 mi N 10 km subsequent workshop focused on how to measure Location of the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord River watersheds those values, and where to find data.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Wild and Scenic River Act 113 Stat
    PUBLIC LAW 106±20ÐAPR. 9, 1999 SUDBURY, ASSABET, AND CONCORD WILD AND SCENIC RIVER ACT 113 STAT. 30 PUBLIC LAW 106±20ÐAPR. 9, 1999 Public Law 106±20 106th Congress An Act Apr. 9, 1999 To designate a portion of the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers as a component [H.R. 193] of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of Sudbury, the United States of America in Congress assembled, Assabet, and Concord Wild SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. and Scenic River Act. This Act may be cited as the ``Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Massachusetts. Wild and Scenic River Act''. 16 USC 1271 note. SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SUDBURY, ASSABET, AND CONCORD SCENIC AND RECREATIONAL RIVERS, MASSACHUSETTS. (a) FINDINGS.ÐThe Congress finds the following: (1) The Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Wild and Scenic River Study Act (title VII of Public Law 101±628; 104 Stat. 4497)Ð (A) designated segments of the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, totaling 29 river miles, for study and potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System; and (B) directed the Secretary of the Interior to establish the Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord Rivers Study Committee (in this section referred to as the ``Study Committee'') to advise the Secretary in conducting the study and in the consideration of management alternatives should the rivers be included in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. (2) The study determined the following river segments are eligible for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System based on their free-flowing condition and outstanding scenic, recreation, wildlife, cultural, and historic values: (A) The 16.6-mile segment of the Sudbury River beginning at the Danforth Street Bridge in the town of Framingham, to its confluence with the Assabet River.
    [Show full text]
  • The Assabet River Pocket Guide a Recreation Guide to the Assabet River OAR
    The Assabet River Pocket Guide A Recreation Guide to the Assabet River OAR The Assabet River “A more lovely stream than this,” Nathaniel Hawthorne said of the Assabet River, “has never flowed on earth, except to lave the interior regions of a poet’s imagination.” Much of the river is still beauti- ful today, with surprisingly remote and unspoiled sections. In 1999, four miles of the Assabet were designated under the federal Wild and Scenic Rivers program. The Assabet River begins in Westborough, flowing north for 31 miles through Northborough, Marlborough, Berlin, Hudson, Stow, Maynard, and Acton until it joins the Sudbury River in the town of Concord to form the Concord River. The river is home to abundant wildlife, including great blue herons, river otters, osprey, and painted turtles. Despite an abundance of dams, dif- Helpful Resources ficult passage in the upper reaches, and even a bit of seasonal whitewater, the Books: Assabet offers some easy and interest- The Concord, Sudbury, and Assabet Rivers: ing paddles for the beginning canoeist A guide to canoeing, wildlife and history. or kayaker. We especially recommend By Ron McAdow. Bliss Publishing Company, the three trips highlighted in purple on the map. Marlborough, MA. 1997. Available through OAR. River Safety Websites: Although the majority of the Assabet OAR: www.assabetriver.org River flows gently, please be aware that Assabet River National Wildlife Refuge: dams, high water (and low bridges), assabetriver.fws.gov downed trees, and seasonal rapids can Assabet River Rail Trail: www.arrtinc.org pose serious hazards to boaters. Please Mass Audubon: www.massaudubon.org be careful and wear a life jacket.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 45, No. 2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society
    Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Journals and Campus Publications Society 10-1984 Bulletin of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society, Vol. 45, No. 2 Massachusetts Archaeological Society Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/bmas Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Copyright © 1984 Massachusetts Archaeological Society This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. BULLETIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 45 NUMBER 2 OCT. 1984 CONTENTS Page EDITOR'S NOTE Barbara E. Luedtke ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 49 TREASURES IN THE PEABODY'S BASEMENT: A BUTTON MOLD WITH AN EXTRAORDINARY INCISED FIGURE Russell J. Barber •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 49 REPORT ON THE BENJAMIN SMITH ARCHAEOLOGICAL COLLECTION, CONCORD, MA. Eric S. Johnson and Thomas F. Mahlstedt •••••••••••••••• 51 A COMPARISON OF SETTLEMENT PATTERNS AND GENERAL LAND USE BETWEEN THE NATIVE AMERICANS AND THE ENGLISH SETTLERS IN SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY ..Zllfred Cammisa ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 66 A SECOND SIXTH-MILLENIUM RADIOCARBON DATE FROM CHARLESTOWN MEAJX)WS Curtiss R. Hoffman ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 77 THE CONTRIBUTORS ......................... •Outside back cover Publisher THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, Inc. BRONSON MUSEUM - 8 NORTH MAIN STREET, ATTLEBORO,
    [Show full text]
  • Simulation of Ground-Water Flow and Evaluation of Water-Management Alternatives in the Assabet River Basin, Eastern Massachusetts
    Simulation of Ground-Water Flow and Evaluation of Water-Management Alternatives in the Assabet River Basin, Eastern Massachusetts By Leslie A. DeSimone Abstract plus wastewater discharge) out of the Assabet Main Stem Upper, Middle, and Lower subbasins, respectively, in an average September. Water-supply withdrawals and wastewater disposal in the The ground-water-flow models were used to evaluate Assabet River Basin in eastern Massachusetts alter the flow and water-management alternatives by simulating hypothetical water quality in the basin. Wastewater discharges and stream- scenarios of altered withdrawals and discharges. A scenario that flow depletion from ground-water withdrawals adversely affect included no water management quantified nonstorm stream- water quality in the Assabet River, especially during low-flow flows that would result without withdrawals, discharges, septic- months (late summer) and in headwater areas. Streamflow system return flow, or consumptive use. Tributary flows in this depletion also contributes to loss of aquatic habitat in tributaries scenario increased in most subbasins by 2 to 44 percent relative to the river. In 1997–2001, water-supply withdrawals averaged to 1997–2001 conditions. The increases resulted mostly from 9.9 million gallons per day (Mgal/d). Wastewater discharges variable combinations of decreased withdrawals and decreased to the Assabet River averaged 11 Mgal/d and included about infiltration to sewers. Average annual nonstorm streamflow in 5.4 Mgal/d that originated from sources outside of the basin. the Assabet River decreased slightly in this scenario, by 2 to 3 The effects of current (2004) and future withdrawals and percent annually, because gains in ground-water discharge were discharges on water resources in the basin were investigated in offset by the elimination of wastewater discharges.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 4 OF 8 MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACTON, TOWN OF 250176 ARLINGTON, TOWN OF 250177 Middlesex County ASHBY, TOWN OF 250178 ASHLAND, TOWN OF 250179 AYER, TOWN OF 250180 BEDFORD, TOWN OF 255209 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BELMONT, TOWN OF 250182 MELROSE, CITY OF 250206 BILLERICA, TOWN OF 250183 NATICK, TOWN OF 250207 BOXBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250184 NEWTON, CITY OF 250208 BURLINGTON, TOWN OF 250185 NORTH READING, TOWN OF 250209 CAMBRIDGE, CITY OF 250186 PEPPERELL, TOWN OF 250210 CARLISLE, TOWN OF 250187 READING, TOWN OF 250211 CHELMSFORD, TOWN OF 250188 SHERBORN, TOWN OF 250212 CONCORD, TOWN OF 250189 SHIRLEY, TOWN OF 250213 DRACUT, TOWN OF 250190 SOMERVILLE, CITY OF 250214 DUNSTABLE, TOWN OF 250191 STONEHAM, TOWN OF 250215 EVERETT, CITY OF 250192 STOW, TOWN OF 250216 FRAMINGHAM, TOWN OF 250193 SUDBURY, TOWN OF 250217 GROTON, TOWN OF 250194 TEWKSBURY, TOWN OF 250218 HOLLISTON, TOWN OF 250195 TOWNSEND, TOWN OF 250219 HOPKINTON, TOWN OF 250196 TYNGSBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250220 HUDSON, TOWN OF 250197 WAKEFIELD, TOWN OF 250221 LEXINGTON, TOWN OF 250198 WALTHAM, CITY OF 250222 LINCOLN, TOWN OF 250199 WATERTOWN, TOWN OF 250223 LITTLETON, TOWN OF 250200 WAYLAND, TOWN OF 250224 LOWELL, CITY OF 250201 WESTFORD, TOWN OF 250225 MALDEN, CITY OF 250202 WESTON, TOWN OF 250226 MARLBOROUGH, CITY OF 250203 WILMINGTON, TOWN OF 250227 MAYNARD, TOWN OF 250204 WINCHESTER, TOWN OF 250228 MEDFORD, CITY OF 250205 WOBURN, CITY OF 250229 Map Revised: July 7, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25017CV004B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Pathogen TMDL for the Concord River Watershed
    Draft Pathogen TMDL for the Concord River Watershed Concord River Basin Prepared as a cooperative effort by: Massachusetts DEP USEPA New England Region 1 1 Winter Street 1 Congress Street, Suite 1100 Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Boston, Massachusetts 02114 ENSR International 2 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) Division of Watershed Management 627 Main Street Worcester, Massachusetts 01608 This report is also available from MADEP’s home page on the World Wide Web. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This list, titled “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management (DWM) – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constituted neither endorsement nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Much of this document was prepared using text and general guidance from the previously approved Neponset River Basin and the Palmer River Basin Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load documents. Acknowledgement This report was developed by ENSR through a partnership with Resource Triangle Institute (RTI) contracting with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic Concord River
    Wild and Scenic Rivers The Sudbury Assabet and Concord Rivers Corridor Description Designated in 1999, the Sudbury Assabet and Concord River Wild and Scenic sections include corridors that stretch for 29 miles along the Sudbury River, Concord River and Assabet River (see map). The corridor width is 0.25 miles wide as determined by the Federal Wild and Scenic River Act (P.L 90-542 as amended.). The designated section includes: 16.6 miles of the Sudbury River -Framingham (below Danforth Street Bridge), Wayland, Sudbury, Lincoln and Concord 4.4 miles of the Assabet River –Concord (1000 feet below the Damon Mill Dam in West Concord to confluence with the Sudbury and Concord Rivers) 8 miles of the Concord River -Concord, Bedford and Billerica (Upstream of the Route 3 Bridge) Outstandingly Remarkable Values of the Concord River Ecology Archeology and History Scenic Recreation Literary resources Background In 1968, the United States Congress established a National Wild and Scenic Rivers system to protect outstanding rivers from the harmful effects of new federal projects such as dams, hydroelectric facilities, bank stabilization and bridges. To be considered “Wild and Scenic” a river must have at least one “outstandingly remarkable” natural, cultural or recreational value. In 1999, under H.R. 193, the river sections were designated as part of the National Wild and Scenic River program. This followed several years of study by a study committee comprised of representatives from the 8 towns along the proposed Wild and Scenic River corridor, from the Commonwealth, from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Organization for the Assabet River (OAR), the Sudbury Valley Trustees (SVT) and staffed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Provides This File for Download from Its Web Site for the Convenience of Users Only
    Disclaimer The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) provides this file for download from its Web site for the convenience of users only. Please be aware that the OFFICIAL versions of all state statutes and regulations (and many of the MassDEP policies) are only available through the State Bookstore or from the Secretary of State’s Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR) Subscription Service. When downloading regulations and policies from the MassDEP Web site, the copy you receive may be different from the official version for a number of reasons, including but not limited to: • The download may have gone wrong and you may have lost important information. • The document may not print well given your specific software/ hardware setup. • If you translate our documents to another word processing program, it may miss/skip/lose important information. • The file on this Web site may be out-of-date (as hard as we try to keep everything current). If you must know that the version you have is correct and up-to-date, then purchase the document through the state bookstore, the subscription service, and/or contact the appropriate MassDEP program. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued FIGURE LIST OF FIGURES A River Basins and Coastal Drainage Areas 1 Hudson River Basin (formerly Hoosic, Kinderhook and Bashbish River Basins) 2 Housatonic River Basin 3 Farmington River Basin 4 Westfield River Basin 5 Deerfield River Basin 6 Connecticut River Basin 7 Millers River Basin 8 Chicopee River Basin 9 Quinebaug
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Water Pollution Control 314 Cmr 4.00
    314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 314 CMR 4.00: MASSACHUSETTS SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS Section 4.01: General Provisions 4.02: Definitions 4.03: Application of Standards 4.04: Antidegradation Provisions 4.05: Classes and Criteria 4.06: Basin Classification and Maps 4.01: General Provisions (1) Title. 314 CMR 4.00 shall be known as the "Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards". (2) Organization of the Standards. 314 CMR 4.00 is comprised of six sections, General Provisions (314 CMR 4.01) Definitions (314 CMR 4.02), Application of Standards (314 CMR 4.03), Antidegradation Provisions (314 CMR 4.04), Classes and Criteria (314 CMR 4.05), and Basin Classification and Maps (314 CMR 4.06). (3) Authority. The Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards are adopted by the Department pursuant to the provisions of M.G.L. c. 21, § 27. (4) Purpose. M.G.L. c. 21, §§ 26 through 53 charges the Department with the duty and responsibility to protect the public health and enhance the quality and value of the water resources of the Commonwealth. It directs the Department to take all action necessary or appropriate to secure to the Commonwealth the benefits of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq. The objective of 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq. is the restoration and maintenance of the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters. To achieve the foregoing requirements the Department has adopted the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards which designate the most sensitive uses for which the various waters of the Commonwealth shall be enhanced, maintained and protected; which prescribe the minimum water quality criteria required to sustain the designated uses; and which contain regulations necessary to achieve the designated uses and maintain existing water quality including, where appropriate, the prohibition of discharges.
    [Show full text]