DOCSLIB.ORG

A. Geology, Soils and Topography Geology and Topography Glacial Deposits Formed the Shape of Cape Cod

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A. Geology, Soils and Topography Geology and Topography Glacial Deposits Formed the Shape of Cape Cod Section IV: Environmental Inventory and Analysis A. Geology, Soils and Topography Geology and Topography Glacial deposits formed the shape of Cape Cod. Approximately 25,000 years ago the Canadian Ice Sheet reached its southernmost point at Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket. Three lobes of ice covered Cape Cod: the Cape Cod Bay Lobe, the South Channel Lobe, and the Buzzards Bay Lobe. About 15,500 years ago the sheets of ice began retreating, depositing rock debris, known as drift, as they receded. Drift ranges from till, an unstratified mixture of fine to coarse material, to deposits sorted by the flow of water and spread across the landscape. The drift deposited by the ice created the major landscape forms found in Falmouth and the Cape: moraines, outwash plains, kames (knobs), and kettle holes. Moraines are terminal ridges that represent the edge of a glacier. As the glacier retreated, drift was churned up and deposited in a ridge. The Buzzards Bay Moraine runs northeast from the Elizabeth Islands through Woods Hole to Sandwich. Outwash plains slope gradually away Map 4-1: Geologic Map of Cape Cod from the Buzzards Bay Moraine to the sea (Figure 4- 1). They are formed by sand Lake deposits and gravel deposits left by water streaming out of the Younger ice-contact deposits melting glacial lobes. Kames and kettles are known as ice Younger outwash deposits contact features. Kames are knobs of drift deposits left by Moraine deposits debris once embedded in ice. Kettles are holes in the ground Older outwash deposits formed by large ice blocks. Kettle holes that reach Older ice-contact deposits groundwater form many of the ponds and lakes found on Source: USGS; Geologic map of Cape Cod (generalized from detailed the Cape. mapping by K. F. Mather, R. P. Goldthwait, L. R. Theismeyer, J. H. Hartshorn, Carl Koteff, and R. N. Oldale). The Cape Cod landscape continues to be shaped by natural forces. Wind has winnowed silt and sand from exposed glacial sediments to form an almost continuous layer across the drift surface. Over centuries, vegetation has recycled this drift, turning it into a layer of sandy topsoil. Soils Soils are formed through the interaction of time, climate, parent material, topography, and plant and animal life. In Barnstable County, the parent material and topography, as it relates to drainage, account for many of the differences among the soils (Map 4-2, also find and enlarged map at the end of the appendix section). Open Space & Recreation Plan - FINAL 25 June 2014 Map 4-2 Soils The formation of soils is a continuing process and generally takes several thousand years for significant changes to take place. The soils of Barnstable County have developed in the last 15,000 years. The soils are considered to be relatively young with Open Space & Recreation Plan - FINAL 26 June 2014 slight alteration of parent material and weak soil horizon development. The interaction of the five factors listed above also result in the development of a soil profile. A soil profile is a vertical section of the soil beginning at the surface and extending down into the unconsolidated underlying material to a depth of 60 inches. A soil horizon is a layer of soil, approximately parallel to the soil surface, with distinct characteristics. The physical and chemical characteristics observed within the soil profile are the basis for differentiating one soil from another (Figure 4-2). Suitability for each soil type is classified on a three-tier scale of limitations (slight, moderate, and severe) based on the ability of the soil to support a proposed use. This scale, developed by the Soil Conservation Service, has been uniformly adopted for planning use (Figure 4-3). From a functional perspective, this scale can assist in open space and recreation planning in a number of ways. Prime agricultural soils have been identified, and can be reserved for farming. Wetlands soils can be identified and protected as conservation areas. Maps of soils with limitations for septic system disposal due to impermeability, saturation, or severe slopes can be used to guide future development. Figure 4-2: Soils Found in Falmouth Category Type Symbol Comments Sands Beaches 9 Hooksan-Dune Complex Sand Pits 9, GP Sandy Loams Better farmland soils Barnstable Very stony Belgrade Very fine Hinckley 136 A-E Gravelly, fine Merrimac Fine Nantucket 323B Stony Sudbury Fine Silty Loams Boxford Enfield Coarse Sands Carver 51 A-E 231 B-E Freetown 7 Cranberry Bogs Loamy Sands Deerfield 54A Farmland soil of local significance Eastchop Pipestone Plymouth Coarse-very stony Mucks Wetlands Soils Open Space & Recreation Plan - FINAL 27 June 2014 Berryland Freetown-ponded 99 Fresh water marsh Freetown-Swansea 1, 2 Ipswich, Pawcatuck, 3 Mantunuck Peats Plymouth-Barnstable Rolling, very-to- Complex extremely bouldery; moraine Urban Land Man made Udorthents Dumps; Landfills Udipsamments 6 Source: Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Official Soil Series Descriptions [Online WWW]. Available URL: "http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html" [Accessed 10 February 2004]. Figure 4-3: Soil Limitations Carver Plymouth- Coarse Loamy Barnstable Sands Sandy Loam Silty Loam Sands Sands Mucks Complex Urban Commercial Buildings Severe Moderate Severe Severe Slight Severe Severe Unclassified Septic Tanks Severe Moderate Severe Severe Slight Severe Severe Unclassified Homesites Severe Slight Moderate Slight Severe Moderate Unclassified Roadways Severe Slight Severe Moderate Slight Severe Moderate Unclassified Sanitary Landfills Severe Slight Severe Severe Moderate Severe Severe Unclassified Landfill Cover Severe Severe Severe Severe Moderate Severe Severe Unclassified Sand-Gravel Source Severe Slight Severe Moderate Moderate Severe Moderate Unclassified Depth to Water Table Shallow Deep Moderate Deep Moderate Shallow Deep Unclassified Agricultural Capability Class Low Med-High Low Low High Low Low Unclassified Farmland Local Soil Type None None None None Significance None None Unclassified Woodland Suitability Unsuitable Medium Medium Low High Unsuitable Medium Unclassified Camping Areas Severe Moderate Moderate Moderate Slight Severe Moderate Unclassified Severe- Playgrounds Severe Severe Moderate Moderate Slight Severe Severe Unclassified Source: Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey of Barnstable County, Massachusetts; March 1993. Open Space & Recreation Plan - FINAL 28 June 2014 B. Landscape Character Map 4-3 Unique Features The scenic resources of Falmouth are great assets for the residents and visitors of the town. The diversity of landscape features—forests, freshwater and coastal ponds, beaches, hills, coastal plains, glacial moraine, ocean vistas, harbors, historic structures, and compact villages— combine to create a memorable visual experience. The Falmouth Historical Commission has prepared a list of landscapes considered to be important for preservation. Among areas identified are: the Shoreline from Trunk River Beach to Manauhant Beach along Vineyard Sound, and the cranberry bogs at the intersection of Old Barnstable Road and Old Meeting House Road. Falmouth Town Meeting has also adopted a list of 40 scenic or coastal roads that have significant trees, stone walls, or view sheds within the layout. These roads are granted additional protections that can be found in Chapter 178 of the Falmouth Town Code (Map 4-3, also find an enlarged map at the end of the appendix section). C. Water Resources The glacier-formed topography, along with an average annual rainfall of 40 inches provides for abundant freshwater ponds, tidal ponds, wetlands, harbors, and groundwater. These resources provide a wide variety of benefits ranging from recreation to public drinking water supplies. Watersheds A watershed is a geographic area where all of the surface and groundwater drain to coastal estuaries, Vineyard Sound, or Buzzards Bay (Map 4-4, also find an enlarged map Open Space & Recreation Plan - FINAL 29 June 2014 Map 4-4 Coastal Pond Recharge at the end of the appendix section). The advantage of planning for a watershed is that water quality can be improved, or protected, by controlling the development and pollution that occurs within the watershed. As the groundwater travels through the watershed, sediments and pollutants are picked up and transported to the ponds, rivers and estuaries. Naturally vegetated areas filter the water and suspend the sediments and pollutants, while paved areas increase the risk of pollution, and increase the velocity of the water, which can lead to erosion and increased sediment load. There are a number of groups monitoring and researching water quality in the watersheds, including the local Pond Watchers, the Massachusetts and National Estuary Programs, the Cape Cod Open Space & Recreation Plan - FINAL 30 June 2014 Commission, the Coalition to Save Buzzards Bay, and the Waquoit Bay National Estuarine Reserve. Surface Water The surface water resources, including: wetlands, ponds, rivers, estuaries and the ocean provide valuable open space for passive and active use. The waters are used for fishing, shellfishing, swimming, boating, mooring sites, and docks. A wide range of flora and fauna, including a number of rare and endangered species depend on adjoining wetlands, and the Conservation Commission administers the Wetlands Regulations to ensure that development is set back from water bodies and a proper buffer is maintained. Falmouth continues to have almost 200 acres of cranberry bogs that are flooded annually. Massachusetts defines ponds measuring ten acres, or more, as “great ponds.” Under this designation, land under the pond is held in public ownership and controlled by the state. These ponds are generally open to the public. Ponds smaller than ten acres are designated as “lesser ponds” and can be privately owned. In some cases, as with the Town Forest that surrounds Long Pond, significant areas of shoreline are in public ownership. In the 1960s the Conservation Commission began a program to acquire land for public access to every pond in Falmouth. While limited, most ponds are accessible to public for fishing, canoeing or swimming.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preserve Cape Cod to Association
    Association to Preserve Cape Cod Association to Preserve Cape Cod, Inc. 2011 Annual Report P.O. Box 398, 3010 Main Street Barnstable, MA 02630 Never Forgotten & Still Making a Difference Maggie Geist retired as executive director of the Association to Preserve Cape Cod in 2011. For a dozen years, Maggie steered our organization over many challenges and established her reputation as both a passionate environmentalist and a creative businesswoman. Capewind, county government reform, the Cape Cod Water Resources Restoration Project, the Upper Cape Water Supply Reserve on 15,000 acres of the Massachusetts Military Reservation, the No Discharge Area designation for Cape Cod Bay and, most of all, clean water were all positively impacted by her proactive style. She is still working with APCC developing a regional wastewater plan. Maggie led APCC and lives her life by the creed instilled upon her by her mom: “Leave the world a better place than you found it.” In her honor, the board of directors established the Geist Internship. The Geist Internship is intended to be a perpetual fund established to permit APCC to help train the next generation of environmental scientists, planners, engineers and creative thinkers. Each summer APCC will hire a promising college student to work on a project to help preserve Cape Cod. The fund is over one third the way toward being a self-perpetuating dedicated fund for this purpose. Member generosity, especially from current and past board members, made this possible. Programs & Projects Marine Invasive Species Monitoring: Over the past decade, many non-native marine plants and animals have arrived in coastal waters, often out- competing local species.
    [Show full text]
  • Processes Influencing the Transport and Fate of Contaminated Sediments in the Coastal Ocean-Boston Harbor and Massachusetts
    26 Section 4: Oceanographic Setting By Bradford Butman, Richard P. Signell, John C. Warner, and P. Soupy Alexander The ocean currents in Massachusetts Bay mix and time because of the complex bathymetry and coastal transport water and material in the bay, and exchange geometry, and because of the multiple processes (for water with the adjacent Gulf of Maine. The currents example wind, river runoff, and currents in the Gulf of can conceptually be separated into tidal currents (which Maine) that drive the flow and change seasonally. fluctuate 1–2 times each day), low-frequency currents The oceanography of Massachusetts Bay may caused by winds and river runoff (which typically be conceptually separated into four seasonal intervals fluctuate with a period of a few days), and a residual (following Geyer and others, 1992) based on the wind current (steady over a few weeks). Field observations and surface waves (fig. 4.1); the temperature and thermal (Butman, 1976; Geyer and others, 1992; Butman and stratification of the water column (fig. 4.2); the salinity, others, 2004a; Butman and others, 2006) and simulations salinity stratification, and horizontal salinity gradients of the currents by numerical hydrodynamic models (for caused by river discharge (fig. 4.3); and the density example Signell and others, 1996; Signell and others, 2000) provide descriptions of the flow pattern, strength, stratification, which results from the temperature and and variability of the currents. Field observations salinity distribution (fig. 4.4). From November through provide measurements of the currents at selected March (winter), the water column is vertically well- locations during specific periods of time, whereas model mixed, and the wind and surface waves are the largest of simulations provide a high-resolution view of the often the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Harbor South Watersheds 2004 Assessment Report
    Boston Harbor South Watersheds 2004 Assessment Report June 30, 2004 Prepared for: Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Prepared by: Neponset River Watershed Association University of Massachusetts, Urban Harbors Institute Boston Harbor Association Fore River Watershed Association Weir River Watershed Association Contents How rapidly is open space being lost?.......................................................35 Introduction ix What % of the shoreline is publicly accessible?........................................35 References for Boston Inner Harbor Watershed........................................37 Common Assessment for All Watersheds 1 Does bacterial pollution limit fishing or recreation? ...................................1 Neponset River Watershed 41 Does nutrient pollution pose a threat to aquatic life? ..................................1 Does bacterial pollution limit fishing or recreational use? ......................46 Do dissolved oxygen levels support aquatic life?........................................5 Does nutrient pollution pose a threat to aquatic life or other uses?...........48 Are there other water quality problems? ....................................................6 Do dissolved oxygen (DO) levels support aquatic life? ..........................51 Do water supply or wastewater management impact instream flows?........7 Are there other indicators that limit use of the watershed? .....................53 Roughly what percentage of the watersheds is impervious? .....................8 Do water supply,
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-16 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 2. Cape Cod and the Islands K. E. Reback, P. D. Brady, K. D. McLaughlin, and C. G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Department of Fish and Game Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts Technical Report Technical May 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-16 A Survey of Anadromous Fish Passage in Coastal Massachusetts Part 2. Cape Cod and the Islands Kenneth E. Reback, Phillips D. Brady, Katherine D. McLauglin, and Cheryl G. Milliken Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Southshore Field Station 50A Portside Drive Pocasset, MA May 2004 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Paul Diodati, Director Department of Fish and Game Dave Peters, Commissioner Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy-Herztfelder, Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Mitt Romney, Governor TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 2: Cape Cod and the Islands Acknowledgements . iii Abstract . iv Introduction . 1 Materials and Methods . 1 Life Histories . 2 Management . 4 Cape Cod Watersheds . 6 Map of Towns and Streams . 6 Stream Survey . 8 Cape Cod Recommendations . 106 Martha’s Vineyard Watersheds . 107 Map of Towns and Streams . 107 Stream Survey . 108 Martha’s Vineyard Recommendations . 125 Nantucket Watersheds . 126 Map of Streams . 126 Stream Survey . 127 Nantucket Recommendations . 132 General Recommendations . 133 Alphabetical Index of Streams . 134 Alphabetical Index of Towns . .. 136 Appendix 1: List of Anadromous Species in MA . 138 Appendix 2: State River Herring Regulations . 139 Appendix 3: Fishway Designs and Examples . 140 Appendix 4: Abbreviations Used . 148 ii Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank the following people for their assistance in carrying out this survey and for sharing their knowledge of the anadromous fish resources of the Commonwealth: Brian Creedon, Tracy Curley, Jack Dixon, George Funnell, Steve Kennedy, Paul Montague, Don St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Massachusetts Bay Hydrodynamic Model: 2005 Simulation
    The Massachusetts Bay Hydrodynamic Model: 2005 Simulation Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Environmental Quality Department Report ENQUAD 2008-12 Jiang MS, Zhou M. 2008. The Massachusetts Bay Hydrodynamic Model: 2005 Simulation. Boston: Massachusetts Water Resources Authority. Report 2008-12. 58 pp. Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Boston, Massachusetts The Massachusetts Bay Hydrodynamic Model: 2005 Simulation Prepared by: Mingshun Jiang & Meng Zhou Department of Environmental, Earth and Ocean Sciences University of Massachusetts Boston 100 Morrissey Blvd Boston, MA 02125 July 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Boston Harbor, Massachusetts Bay and Cape Cod Bay system (MBS) is a semi- enclosed coastal system connected to the Gulf of Maine (GOM) through boundary exchange. Both natural processes including climate change, seasonal variations and episodic events, and human activities including nutrient inputs and fisheries affect the physical and biogeochemical environment in the MBS. Monitoring and understanding of physical–biogeochemical processes in the MBS is important to resource management and environmental mitigation. Since 1992, the Massachusetts Water Resource Authority (MWRA) has been monitoring the MBS in one of the nation’s most comprehensive monitoring programs. Under a cooperative agreement between the MWRA and University of Massachusetts Boston (UMB), the UMB modeling team has conducted numerical simulations of the physical–biogeochemical conditions and processes in the MBS during 2000-2004. Under a new agreement between MWRA, Battelle and UMB, the UMB continues to conduct a numerical simulation for 2005, a year in which the MBS experienced an unprecedented red–tide event that cost tens of millions dollars to Massachusetts shellfish industry. This report presents the model validation and simulated physical environment in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 WATER HEALTH REPORT-Draft
    State of the Waters: Cape Cod 2019 Cape Cod Water Health Report State of the Waters: Cape Cod 2019 Cape Cod Water Health Report Association to Preserve Cape Cod October 1, 2019 Prepared by: Andrew Gottlieb, Jo Ann Muramoto, Ph.D., Jordanne Feldman, Bryan Horsley, Kristin Andres and Don Keeran 1. Introduction The State of the Waters: Cape Cod is an assessment of the Cape’s water quality, designed to help you understand the water quality problems that we face and the actions that are needed to address these problems. The Association to Preserve Cape Cod (APCC) launched this project in 2019 in order to answer the question: “How healthy are Cape Cod’s waters?” This website is the place to find out about the Cape’s water quality and what can be done to address water pollution and achieve clean water. For this multi-year project, APCC collected existing data on water quality on Cape Cod for the purpose of determining the health of Cape Cod’s waters. APCC evaluated water quality in coastal waters (saltwater), freshwater ponds and lakes, and public drinking water supplies. APCC used existing methods to score water quality and used the scores to distinguish between degraded surface waters where immediate action is needed to improve water quality vs. surface waters with acceptable quality where ongoing protection is needed to avoid any decline in quality. The results are summarized in this annual water health report. To guide public action, APCC prepared a Water Action Plan that contains recommendations for changes in policies, actions, and regulations to improve and protect our waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Colonial Times on Buzzard's Bay
    mw fa noll mJI BRIGHT LEGACY ODe half tile IDCOlDe froID tb1I Leaaer. "b1eh .... re­ ee1..ed 10 .810 oDder tile "W of JONATHAN BIlOWN BIlIGHT of WoItIwo. M_hoa.tu.1oto be ellpeDd.d for bookl for tile CoU. Library. The otller half of til. IDcolDe :e:::t::d~=h.r 10 H....... UDI...nltyfortll. HINIlY BIlIGHT. JIl•• "ho cIIed at Waterto..... MaaadI_.10'686. 10 til. aboeDCD of loch deoceodootl. otller penoD' oro eUpbl. to til. ocbolanhlpo. Th.,,1U reqolreo tIIat t1110 100000_ lDeDt Ihall be ...... 10 ...ery book "ded to tile Library ....r Ito ,rorioIooo. .... ogle R FROM THE- BRIGHT LEGACY. Descendants of Henry Brifl'hl, jr., who died at Water. town,MasS., in J6S6,are entitled to hold scholarships in Harvard College, established in ,830 under the wil,-of JONATHAN BROWN BRIGHT of Waltham, Mass., with one half the income of this l.egacy. ~uch descendants failing, other persons are eligible to the scholarships. The will requires that this a.I)nOUDcement shall be made in every book added'" to the Library under its provisions. Received £ j Coogle COLONIAL TIMES ON BUZZARD'S BAY BY WILLIAM ROOT BLISS ..ThIs Is the place. Stand still, my steed, Let me review the scene, And summon from the shadowy Put The (ClI1IllI lhat once haye been.It LoKGnLLOW. / ,'BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY _fie flitl~ibe tl'rr-" ftam~ 1888 Dig; Ized by Google Copyright, .888, By WILLIAM ROOT BLISS. Tlu RirJlf',iu P...... Ca..u..itl,p: Electrotyped and Printed by H. O. Houghton 8: Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Massachusetts' Watersheds
    AMESBURY Massachusetts' 28 Watersheds SALISBURY MERRIMAC N EW BU RY PO RT WEST NEWBURY HAVERHILL VT NEWBURY GROVELAND CLARKSBURG MONROE NH METHUEN LAWRENCE PARKER GEORGETOWN ROWLEY ROWE WILLIAMSTOWN LEYDEN NORTH ADAMS HEATH BERNARDSTON FLORIDA COLRAIN NORTHFIELD WARWICK ROYALSTON BOXFORD IPSWICH ASHBY DUNSTABLE R N MERRIMACK O DRACUT O WINCHENDON TOWNSEND PEPPERELL H R C G K U T ASHBURNHAM O H TOPSFIELD P R O CHARLEMONT O A SB N R G ANDOVER D T YN O GILL T LOWELL V G E L R HAMILTON O HUDSON U TEWKSBURY ESSEX NEW ASHFORD ADAMS C GREENFIELD ERVING E GROTON S T SAVOY ORANGE IPSWICH E DEERFIELD MILLERS CHELMSFORD MIDDLETON WENHAM R BUCKLAND SHELBURNE HAWLEY FITCHBURG LUNENBURG ATHOL WESTFORD MANCHESTER GARDNER NORTH READING CHESHIRE SHAWSHEEN DANVERS P BEVERLY H SHIRLEY N I TEMPLETON O L AYER BILLERICA MONTAGUE T L WENDELL L Y IP WESTMINSTER G N S N N I F K T LANESBOROUGH M I C O READING E NY L I L O N D C LITTLETON W PEABODY SALEM N CARLISLE A PLAINFIELD ASHFIELD H WINDSOR DEERFIELD N CONWAY O T NASHUA G LEOMINSTER HARVARD N I GH BEDFORD L DALTON OU R D R U O B N HUBBARDSTON LANCASTER B ACTON S X T A WOBURN NORTH COASTAL O B O L LEVERETT WAKEFIELD LYNN MARBLEHEAD R SHUTESBURY N CUMMINGTON S E E A SWAMPSCOTT D PITTSFIELD PETERSHAM H U N CONCORD M G A E L U R M U NEW SALEM E RO S ST S S PRINCETON HE E HINSDALE GOSHEN LEXINGTON INC WHATELY STERLING W PERU D BOLTON R M N R A E DE STOW D MAL E N NAHANT LINCOLN A F V Y R O BARRE N L E A I R O NG T R M D T T T E IN B O E L E N R WORTHINGTON C L E WILLIAMSBURG M V RICHMOND O E W HUDSON SUDBURY N
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Annual Report
    2015 ANNUAL REPORT IT IS OUR GREAT PLEASURE TO SHARE THIS 2015 ANNUAL REPORT FROM THE with you - our members and supporters – whose outstanding commitment PRESIDENT to our success made possible such amazing achievements over the past year. The accomplishments featured in this report are wonderful investments AND CHAIR in the future of our Bay. And they point the way to so much exciting work ahead. They are models, not end points. The Acushnet Sawmill is not simply the best waterfront park created in Greater New Bedford in decades; it is a template we can use to restore fish and wetlands at dozens of similarly-damaged sites on all of the Bay’s rivers. The protection of 411 coastal acres on Nasketucket Bay is not simply the biggest land preservation victory on Buzzards Bay in a generation; we can apply the public-private funding model we created to thousands of new acres of threatened land. The installation of 20 new septic systems on West Falmouth Harbor is not simply another step in the ongoing restoration of that degraded waterway; neighborhoods all along the Bay can apply this model to select technologies and engage homeowners to create workable solutions to local wastewater pollution. These successes were built around the Coalition’s unique approach: strong collaborations with towns, neighborhoods, and landowners; a commitment to seeking out new ways to solve tough problems; and unabashed doggedness. The challenges facing our Bay require nothing less. The Acushnet Coalition founder George Hampson’s last day on the Bay last fall was spent on our boat, the R/V Buzzards Baykeeper®, teaching staff how to Sawmill restoration, monitor the health of the tiny creatures that live in the Bay’s bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4
    PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 REVISED NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV001C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this Preliminary FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Time of Year Restrictions (Toys) for Coastal Alteration Projects to Protect Marine Fisheries Resources in Massachusetts
    Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report TR-47 Recommended Time of Year Restrictions (TOYs) for Coastal Alteration Projects to Protect Marine Fisheries Resources in Massachusetts N. T. Evans, K. H. Ford, B. C. Chase, and J. J. Sheppard Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Department of Fish and Game Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Technical April 2011 Revised January 2015 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Report Series Managing Editor: Michael P. Armstrong Scientific Editor: Bruce T. Estrella The Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Technical Reports present information and data pertinent to the management, biology and commercial and recreational fisheries of anadromous, estuarine, and marine organisms of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and adjacent waters. The series presents information in a timely fashion that is of limited scope or is useful to a smaller, specific audience and therefore may not be appropriate for national or international journals. Included in this series are data summaries, reports of monitoring programs, and results of studies that are directed at specific management problems. All Reports in the series are available for download in PDF format at: http://www.mass.gov/marinefisheries/publications/technical.htm or hard copies may be obtained from the Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Ave., Gloucester, MA 01930 USA (978-282-0308). TR-1 McKiernan, D.J., and D.E. Pierce. 1995. The Loligo squid fishery in Nantucket and Vineyard Sound. TR-2 McBride, H.M., and T.B. Hoopes. 2001. 1999 Lobster fishery statistics. TR-3 McKiernan, D.J., R. Johnston, and W.
    [Show full text]
  • Buzzards Bay Tern Restoration Project
    - College Internships - Roseate Tern Terns are small, ground-nesting Buzzards Bay Tern seabirds that are highly charismatic. The species we are Restoration Project working with nest in dense colonies and are very aggressive. They protect their nests and young by diving at, pecking, and College-level interns are needed to restore rare and defecating on intruders, including endangered terns to Bird, Ram, and Penikese Islands in researchers. Extreme care must Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. These islands support nearly be exercised when working half the North American population of the federally around their camouflaged eggs endangered Roseate Tern; active management to protect the and chicks. population is critical to recovery. Interns are a critical part of our Nest monitoring team: they will work closely with Most interns can expect to rotate the Project Leader and Site among islands. When at Ram and Bird, Managers and will gain a variety of the crew will travel to islands on a daily hands-on skills. Activities include basis in a small boat on an irregular 5-6 censusing of Common, Roseate, day/week schedule. When at Penikese, and Arctic Terns; monitoring tern the crew will set up and live in a field growth and productivity; trapping camp and work on an irregular 5-7 and banding; reading bands on day/week schedule depending on adults through spotting scopes; weather and an irregular boat schedule. monitoring productivity of Applicants must be able to carry heavy American Oystercatchers; field equipment a distance of ½ mile for discouragement, censusing, and camp set-up and break-down, and be monitoring productivity of nesting Tern chick comfortable living in a remote island gulls; habitat management; banding setting with limited facilities for up to 2- maintaining field notebooks; and 3 weeks at a time.
    [Show full text]