Petyayan-Vara Rare-Earth Carbonatites (Vuoriyarvi Massif, Russia)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
geosciences Article Ti-Nb Mineralization of Late Carbonatites and Role of Fluids in Its Formation: Petyayan-Vara Rare-Earth Carbonatites (Vuoriyarvi Massif, Russia) Evgeniy Kozlov 1,* ID , Ekaterina Fomina 1, Mikhail Sidorov 1 and Vladimir Shilovskikh 2 ID 1 Geological Institute, Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 14, Fersmana Street, 184209 Apatity, Russia; [email protected] (E.F.); [email protected] (M.S.) 2 Resource center for Geo-Environmental Research and Modeling (GEOMODEL), St. Petersburg State University, 1, Ulyanovskaya Street, 198504 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-953-758-7632 Received: 6 July 2018; Accepted: 25 July 2018; Published: 28 July 2018 Abstract: This article is devoted to the geology of titanium-rich varieties of the Petyayan-Vara rare-earth dolomitic carbonatites in Vuoriyarvi, Northwest Russia. Analogues of these varieties are present in many carbonatite complexes. The aim of this study was to investigate the behavior of high field strength elements during the late stages of carbonatite formation. We conducted a multilateral study of titanium- and niobium-bearing minerals, including a petrographic study, Raman spectroscopy, microprobe determination of chemical composition, and electron backscatter diffraction. Three TiO2-polymorphs (anatase, brookite and rutile) and three pyrochlore group members (hydroxycalcio-, fluorcalcio-, and kenoplumbopyrochlore) were found to coexist in the studied rocks. The formation of these minerals occurred in several stages. First, Nb-poor Ti-oxides were formed in the fluid-permeable zones. The overprinting of this assemblage by residual fluids led to the generation of Nb-rich brookite (the main niobium concentrator in the Petyayan-Vara) and minerals of the pyrochlore group. This process also caused niobium enrichment with of early generations of Ti oxides. Our results indicate abrupt changes in the physicochemical parameters at the late hydro (carbo) thermal stage of the carbonatite formation and high migration capacity of Ti and Nb under these conditions. The metasomatism was accompanied by the separation of these elements. Keywords: metasomatism; brookite; anatase; pyrochlore; niobium; carbonatites; Vuoriyarvi massif 1. Introduction Carbonatites are defined in the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) system of classification as igneous rocks containing more than 50 modal percent carbonate [1]. Varieties of carbonatite are named based on the dominant carbonate mineral [2]. They have been chemically classified according to the percent by mass of CaO, MgO, and FeOT and MnO [1], which has an evolutionary aspect as well. Most of the known carbonatite complexes have a common scheme of carbonatite genesis, whereby early calciocarbonatites were replaced by magnesiocarbonatites, and ferrocarbonatites, as the most recent [3]. The latter are considerably affected by carbo(hydro)thermal-metasomatic processes as they develop [4]. In general, carbonatites account for more than 50% of global rare-earth elements (REE) resources, which include Y and La-Lu [5]. REE enrichment is “most commonly found only in the latest and most highly evolved parts of a carbonatite intrusion” [6]. The accumulation of REE in late carbonatites is assumed to be controlled by fluid activity [7–16]. Such a surplus in articles reflects a keen interest in REE occurring in late carbonatites. More than 99% of the world’s niobium (Nb) is also Geosciences 2018, 8, 281; doi:10.3390/geosciences8080281 www.mdpi.com/journal/geosciences Geosciences 2018, 8, 281 2 of 19 known to be associated with carbonatite complexes [17]. Still, only a limited number of works were dedicated to the behavior of high field strength elements (HFSE), which include Ti, Nb, Ta, Zr, and Hf, regardless of commercial value, at the final stages of the carbonatite genesis. The reason is that HFSE, unlike REE, are thought to be confined to the magmatic stage of the carbonatite genesis [18]. Moreover, a regular decrease in HFSE content occurs from early to late carbonatites [19]. However, this may not exclusively be the case. In most carbonatite deposits, the main niobium concentrators are minerals of the pyrochlore group and, less frequently, the perovskite, columbite, and euxenite groups [17]. The deposits are divided into primary (i.e., primarily magmatic) and secondary. The latter are richer and are supposed to have accumulated Nb minerals and other HFSE, due to their low mobility in the areas of laterite weathering above primary deposits. As such, late carbonatites have a specific HFSE-mineralization. Examples include the industrially valuable deposits of the Magnet Cove complex in the U.S. [20,21], carbonatites of the Salpeterkop complex in South Africa [22], and the Gross Brukkaros complex in Namibia [23]. Nb-rich polymorphs of TiO2 play a key role in all the listed deposits. These minerals (anatase, rutile, and brookite) are also found in many other complexes [24]. They are typomorphic for late carbonatites and reflect the process that completes the picture of late carbonatite petrogenesis. The evolution of the Morro dos Seis Lagos Nb (Ti, REE) deposit (Amazonas, Brazil) deserves particular attention. Here again, the main ore mineral is Nb-rich rutile. Reserves of this deposit are tremendous: they are up to 2.9 billion tons with 2.81 wt % Nb2O5 [25], which is much higher than in the largest known pyrochlore deposit. Hypergenesis certainly played a crucial role in the HFSE concentration process in the Morro dos Seis Lagos. However, laterites in this complex formed after ferro-(siderite)carbonatites that were originally rich in Ti and Nb [25]. In the Seis Lagos, like in many other complexes, Nb-bearing oxides are described as secondary phases replacing originally magmatic pyrochlores, perovskites, and other minerals. Still, this mechanism is not universal for carbonatites. Pseudomorphing of originally magmatic minerals is commonly associated with direct deposition of TiO2 polymorphs from fluids. In the latter case, more Nb often occurs in titanium phases, as described for the Gross Brukkaros [23]. Moreover, some examples have no pseudomorphs of rutile, brookite, or anatase after other phases. Only paramorphs of certain TiO2 modifications have been found, like in the Magnet Cove [26]. This calls into question the existing models of HFSE mineralization in carbonatites. Considering these challenges, decoding the processes of the late carbonatites petrogenesis is a major task. Determining these processes has both practical and fundamental value. The key step in the petrogenetic decoding is applying genetic mineralogy methods to Ti and Nb oxides [23,27–29]. The real challenge is dividing the late metasomatic changes and hypergenesis processes, which obscure earlier processes. The task becomes easier in the Vuoriyarvi. Weathering crusts that existed before the latest glaciations were eroded by glacial abrasion. Subsequently, almost no hypergenesis processes occurred due to the site’s location in the sub-Arctic region [30]. These “preserved” sites help to identify products of late hydrothermal alteration and those of hypergenetic processes [31]. Studying the evolution of the Ti-Nb mineralization in the Petyayan-Vara has supported a high migration capacity at the late hydrothermal stage of such immobile elements as Ti and Nb. We have also found evidence of fluid activity being accompanied by these elements’ fractionation. 2. Geological Setting of the Petyayan-Vara Rocks This research focused on the poorly studied carbonatites of the Petyayan-Vara area at the eastern flank of the Vuoriyarvi alkaline-ultrabasic carbonatite complex, southwest of the Murmansk region, Northwest Russia. The Vuoriyarvi is one of the Devonian Kola Alkaline Province massifs [32]. Its concentrically zonal structure (Figure1) includes almost all rock varieties typical for such massifs [33]. Geosciences 2018, 8, 281 3 of 19 Geosciences 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 19 Figure 1. The geological setting and structure of the Vuoriyarvi alkaline-ultrabasic carbonatite Figure 1. The geological setting and structure of the Vuoriyarvi alkaline-ultrabasic carbonatite complex complex after [33], simplified and added. Blue circles indicate positions of the Tukhta-Vara, Neske- after [33], simplified and added. Blue circles indicate positions of the Tukhta-Vara, Neske-Vara and Vara and Petyayan-Vara carbonatite fields and the Kolvikskiy agpaitic nepheline-syenite massif- Petyayan-Vara carbonatite fields and the Kolvikskiy agpaitic nepheline-syenite massif-satellite. satellite. Thus, at the current erosion section, the massif core is composed of olivitites (the first phase of Thus, at the current erosion section, the massif core is composed of olivitites (the first phase of intrusion) surrounded by pyroxenites (the intermediate ring, second phase) and foidolites (the outer intrusion) surrounded by pyroxenites (the intermediate ring, second phase) and foidolites (the outer ring, third phase). The next (fourth) stage of the magma intrusion produced nepheline syenites and ring, third phase). The next (fourth) stage of the magma intrusion produced nepheline syenites and related rocks concentrated in the Kolvikskiy massif-satellite mostly. The youngest formations of the related rocks concentrated in the Kolvikskiy massif-satellite mostly. The youngest formations of the Vuoriyarvi are stockwork-like bodies of various carbonatites (fifth phase) cutting other rocks and Vuoriyarvi are stockwork-like bodies of various