DOCSLIB.ORG

I a Database of Produced Water Constituents with Ranking Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I a Database of Produced Water Constituents with Ranking Of A Database of Produced Water Constituents with Ranking of Human Health Risk By Sydney M. Joffre B.S. Chemical Engineering, University of Colorado, 2018 B.S. Environmental Engineering, University of Colorado, 2019 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Science Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering 2020 Committee Members: Cloelle Danforth Karl Linden James Rosenblum Joseph Ryan i Abstract: Sydney M. Joffre (Master of Science, Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering) A Database of Produced Water Constituents with Ranking of Human Health Risk Thesis Directed by Professor Joseph N. Ryan Produced water is the largest waste stream of upstream oil and gas production in terms of volume. This study aims to address the implications of produced water reuse applications and inadvertent releases. We created a database of compounds identified in produced water from onshore oil and gas operations in North America and developed a prioritization scheme for those chemicals based on potential risk to human health. Through a comprehensive literature review, we found 179 studies that met our inclusion criteria. In total, there were 1,337 chemicals with a Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) number and 41 general water quality parameters (e.g., total dissolved solids, alkalinity) in produced water reported by the studies. We used the database to create a list of unique chemicals that had data available through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s CompTox Dashboard and were in two or more individual samples at concentrations above the method detection limit. This resulted in a working list of 581 chemicals, comprised of 458 organic chemicals, 98 inorganic chemicals, and 25 radionuclides. Our prioritization scheme focused on the 390 organic chemicals in the working list that had at least one hazard metric available. Our prioritization scheme equally integrated aspects of exposure and hazard using the Toxicological Prioritization Index (ToxPi) to generate a ranking of compounds based on risk. The seven chemicals with the highest relative risk were organochlorine insecticides that are not expected to be associated with the oil and gas industry. The eighth-ranked compound, dodecahydro-1H-phenalene, was a hydrocarbon, which are expected to be identified in produced water. As research efforts into characterizing produced water expands, this database can provide a platform for potential uses such as generating a list of chemicals from a specific location that can then be prioritized using the scheme laid out in this study. ii Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES V LIST OF FIGURES VI 1 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 1.1 PRODUCED WATER COMPOSITION AND SOURCES ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.1.1 Produced water composition …………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 4 1.1.2 Produced water sources ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 6 1.1.3 Produced water analytical challenges …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9 1.2 POTENTIAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM PRODUCED WATER REUSE AND SPILLS……………………………………. 10 1.3 THE ROLE OF RISK ASSESSMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 14 1.4 OBJECTIVES………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 15 2 METHODS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 16 2.1 PART I: DATABASE CREATION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16 2.1.1 Literature review …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16 2.1.2 Database development …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 2.2 PART II: RISK PRIORITIZATION STRATEGY OF CHEMICALS IN PRODUCED WATER …………………………………………………………… 20 2.2.1 Produced water chemicals working list …………………………………………………………………………………………. 20 2.2.2 Associated data sources ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 23 2.2.3 Exposure pathway ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 25 2.2.4 Exposure domain ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 27 2.2.5 Hazard domain ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 34 2.2.6 Data integration and prioritization using the Toxicological Prioritization Index …………………………….. 35 2.2.7 Data availability ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 39 2.2.8 Sensitivity analysis ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 43 2.2.9 Reference compounds ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 44 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 46 3.1 PART I: DATABASE……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 46 3.1.1 Identification of publications, samples, and chemicals in produced water through comprehensive literature review …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 46 3.2 PART II: PRIORITIZATION OF CHEMICALS IN PRODUCED WATER ………………………………………………………………………………. 47 3.2.1 Working list for prioritization scheme ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 47 3.2.2 Collection and analysis of toxicity data for chemicals in prioritization scheme ………………………………. 50 3.2.3 Data integration and prioritization using ToxPi …………………………………………………………………………….. 53 3.2.4 Sensitivity analysis ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 71 3.2.5 Inorganic compounds without toxicity data ………………………………………………………………………………….. 87 3.2.6 Radionuclides ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 87 3.3 PART III: INTEGRATED FINDINGS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 89 3.3.1 Future use of database …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 89 3.3.2 Compound rank summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 90 3.3.3 Organic compounds with toxicity data ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 92 3.3.4 Prioritization scheme sensitivity ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 93 3.3.5 Comparison to Danforth et al. (2020) …………………………………………………………………………………………… 94 4 CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 98 5 WORKS CITED ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 99 6 APPENDIX ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 115 6.1 DATABASE CREATION …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 115 iii 6.1.1 Literature review search logic ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 115 6.1.2 Abbreviations used in database ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 116 6.2 EXPOSURE DOMAIN: IONIZED COMPOUNDS …………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 117 6.3 DATABASE RESULTS ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 120 6.4 TOXPI RESULTS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 123 6.4.1 Analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 123 6.4.2 Organic compounds without toxicity data …………………………………………………………………………………… 163 6.4.3 Inorganic compounds with toxicity data ……………………………………………………………………………………… 167 6.5 SENSITIVITY ANALYSES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 169 6.5.1 Missing data ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 169 6.5.2 Domain weights ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 180 6.6 INORGANIC COMPOUNDS WITHOUT TOXICITY DATA …………………………………………………………………………………………… 192 6.7 RADIONUCLIDES ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 194 6.8 FUTURE USE OF DATABASE …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 195 6.9 COMPARISON TO DANFORTH ET AL. (2020) ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 196 iv List of Tables Table 1. Isomer mixtures on the working list ............................................................................................................. 22 Table 2. Mobility calculation parameters .................................................................................................................. 32 Table 3. Search logic for identifying acids and bases ................................................................................................. 33 Table 4. Scaling equations for the exposure domain metrics.................................................................................... 37 Table 5. Cases used in the missing data treatment sensitivity analysis .................................................................... 43 Table 6. Cases used to evaluate the sensitivity of the hazard and exposure domains............................................. 44 Table 7. Experimental values of exposure metrics for the exposure domain reference compounds ...................... 45 Table 8. Experimental toxicity values for the five hazard domain reference compounds ....................................... 45 Table 9. Organic compounds not included on the working list ................................................................................. 48 Table 10. Availability of experimental and predicted toxicity values for the 556 organic and inorganic compounds on the working list ............................................................................................................................................. 51 Table 11. Availability of experimental and predicted toxicity values for the 458 organic compounds on the working list ........................................................................................................................................................ 52 Table 12. Availability of experimental toxicity values for the 98 inorganic compounds on the working list .......... 52 Table 13. Rank and ToxPi scores for the 40 organic compounds with toxicity data that had the highest relative risk. ...................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs During 2020–2024
    IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024 Report of the Advisory Group to Recommend Priorities for the IARC Monographs during 2020–2024 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Acetaldehyde (CAS No. 75-07-0) ................................................................................................. 3 Acrolein (CAS No. 107-02-8) ....................................................................................................... 4 Acrylamide (CAS No. 79-06-1) .................................................................................................... 5 Acrylonitrile (CAS No. 107-13-1) ................................................................................................ 6 Aflatoxins (CAS No. 1402-68-2) .................................................................................................. 8 Air pollutants and underlying mechanisms for breast cancer ....................................................... 9 Airborne gram-negative bacterial endotoxins ............................................................................. 10 Alachlor (chloroacetanilide herbicide) (CAS No. 15972-60-8) .................................................. 10 Aluminium (CAS No. 7429-90-5) .............................................................................................. 11
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Enzymes on Strawberry Volatiles During Storage, at Different Ripeness
    Effect of Enzymes on Strawberry Volatiles During Storage, at Different Ripeness Level, in Different Cultivars and During Eating Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Gulsah Ozcan Graduate Program in Food Science and Technology The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Sheryl Ann Barringer, Adviser W. James Harper John Litchfield 1 Copyright by Gülşah Özcan 2010 ii ABSTRACT Strawberry samples with enzyme activity and without enzyme activity (stannous chloride added) were measured for real time formation of lipoxygenase (LOX) derived aroma compounds after 5 min pureeing using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS). The concentration of (Z)-3-hexenal and (E)-2-hexenal increased immediately after blending and gradually decreased over time while hexanal concentration increased for at least 5 min in ground strawberries. The formation of hexanal was slower than the formation of (Z)-3-hexenal and (E)-2-hexenal in the headspace of pureed strawberries. The concentration of LOX aldehydes and esters significantly increased during refrigerated storage. Damaging strawberries increased the concentration of LOX aldehydes but did not significantly affect the concentration of esters. The concentrations of many of the esters were strongly correlated to their corresponded acids and/or aldehydes. The concentration of LOX generated aldehydes decreased during ripening, while fruity esters increased. Different varieties had different aroma profiles and esters were the greatest percentage of the volatiles. The aroma release of some of the LOX derived aldehydes in the mouthspace in whole strawberries compared to chopped strawberries showed that these volatiles are formed in the mouth during chewing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bismuth Chloride Solution SDS US
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Issue Date 10-Nov-2015 Revision Date 11-Nov-2015 Version 1 1. IDENTIFICATION Product identifier Product Name Bismuth Trichloride Solution Other means of identification Product Code 0650 UN/ID no. UN1760 Synonyms Bismuth chloride; Trichlorobismuth, Trichlorobismuthine Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use Recommended Use Laboratory chemicals. Uses advised against No information available Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Manufacturer Address Harrell Industries, Inc. 2495 Commerce Drive Rock Hill, SC 29730 www.harrellindustries.com Emergency telephone number Company Phone Number 803-327-6335 Fax Number 803-327-7808 24 Hour Emergency Phone Number (800) 633-8253 PERS Emergency Telephone (800) 633-8253 (PERS) 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Classification OSHA Regulatory Status This chemical is considered hazardous by the 2012 OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) Acute toxicity - Inhalation (Gases) Category 4 Acute toxicity - Inhalation (Dusts/Mists) Category 4 Skin corrosion/irritation Category 1 Sub-category A Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 1 Specific target organ toxicity (single exposure) Category 3 Label elements Emergency Overview Warning Hazard statements Corrosive to metals. Causes severe skin burns and eye damage May cause respiratory irritation _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 / 8 0650 - Bismuth Trichloride Solution Revision Date 11-Nov-2015 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Appearance Clear, colorless to yellow Physical state liquid Odor Faint hydrochloric acid odor. liquid Precautionary Statements - Prevention Wash skin thoroughly after handling Wear eye protection/ face protection Wear protective gloves Precautionary Statements - Response Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of soap and water IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Crown Chemical Resistance Chart
    Crown Polymers, Corp. 11111 Kiley Drive Huntley, IL. 60142 USA www.crownpolymers.com 847-659-0300 phone 847-659-0310 facisimile 888-732-1270 toll free Chemical Resistance Chart Crown Polymers Floor and Secondary Containment Systems Products: CrownShield covers the following five (4) formulas: CrownShield 50, Product No. 320 CrownCote, Product No. 401 CrownShield 40-2, Product No. 323 CrownShield 28, Product No. 322 CrownPro AcidShield, Product No. 350 CrownCote AcidShield, Product No. 430 CrownPro SolventShield, Product No. 351 CrownCote SolventShield, Product No. 440 This chart shows chemical resistance of Crown Polymers foundational floor and secondary containment product line that would be exposed to chemical spill or immersion conditions. The chart was designed to provide general product information. For specific applications, contact your local Crown Polymers Floor and Secondary Containment Representative or call direct to the factory. ; Resistant to chemical immersion up to 7 days followed by wash down with water 6 Spillage environments that will be cleaned up within 72 hours after initial exposure. 9 Not Recommended Chemical CrownShield SolventShield AcidShield Chemical CrownShield SolventShield AcidShield 1, 4-Dichloro-2-butene 9 6 6 Aluminum Bromate ; ; ; 1, 4-Dioxane 9 6 6 Aluminum Bromide ; ; ; 1-1-1 Trichloroethane 9 ; ; Aluminum Chloride ; ; ; 2, 4-Pentanedione 6 ; 6 Aluminum Fluoride (25%) ; ; ; 3, 4-Dichloro-1-butene 6 6 6 Aluminum Hydroxide ; ; ; 4-Picoline (0-50%) 9 6 6 Aluminum Iodine ; ; ; Acetic Acid (0-15%) 9 6 6
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review Protocol for the Inorganic Mercury Salts IRIS Assessment
    EPA/635/R-20/239 IRIS Assessment Protocol www.epa.gov/iris Systematic Review Protocol for the Inorganic Mercury Salts IRIS Assessment CASRN 7487-94-7 (Mercuric Chloride) CASRN 1344-48-5 (Mercuric Sulfide) CASRN 10112-91-1 (Mercurous Chloride) February 2021 Integrated Risk Information System Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC Systematic Review Protocol for the Inorganic Mercury Salts IRIS Assessment DISCLAIMER This document is a preliminary draft for review purposes only. This information is distributed solely for review purposes under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by the Environmental Protection Agency. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any Agency determination or policy. It is being circulated for comments on its technical clarity and science policy implications. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. This document is a draft for review purposes only and does not constitute Agency policy. ii DRAFT―DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE Systematic Review Protocol for the Inorganic Mercury Salts IRIS Assessment CONTENTS AUTHORS|CONTRIBUTORS|REVIEWERS ........................................................................................................ 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet
    Safety data sheet Page: 1/13 BASF Safety data sheet according to UN GHS 4th rev. Date / Revised: 23.10.2017 Version: 2.0 Product: Pearl-Glo® SF PG1099 (ID no. 30322522/SDS_COS_00/EN) Date of print 24.10.2017 1. Identification Product identifier Pearl-Glo® SF PG1099 Chemical name: Pearl-Glo SF CAS Number: 7787-59-9 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Relevant identified uses: cosmetic ingredient Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Company: BASF SE 67056 Ludwigshafen GERMANY Telephone: +49 621 60-48799 E-mail address: [email protected] Emergency telephone number International emergency number: Telephone: +49 180 2273-112 2. Hazards Identification Classification of the substance or mixture According to UN GHS criteria No need for classification according to GHS criteria for this product. Page: 2/13 BASF Safety data sheet according to UN GHS 4th rev. Date / Revised: 23.10.2017 Version: 2.0 Product: Pearl-Glo® SF PG1099 (ID no. 30322522/SDS_COS_00/EN) Date of print 24.10.2017 Label elements Globally Harmonized System (GHS) The product does not require a hazard warning label in accordance with GHS criteria. Other hazards According to UN GHS criteria No specific dangers known, if the regulations/notes for storage and handling are considered. 3. Composition/Information on Ingredients Substances Chemical nature INCI Name: BISMUTH OXYCHLORIDE Contains: Bismuth chloride oxide CAS Number: 7787-59-9 EC-Number: 232-122-7 Hazardous ingredients (GHS) According to UN GHS criteria No particular hazards known. Mixtures Not applicable 4. First-Aid Measures Description of first aid measures Remove contaminated clothing.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Abietic Acid R Abrasive Silica for Polishing DR Acenaphthene M (LC
    1 abietic acid R abrasive silica for polishing DR acenaphthene M (LC) acenaphthene quinone R acenaphthylene R acetal (see 1,1-diethoxyethane) acetaldehyde M (FC) acetaldehyde-d (CH3CDO) R acetaldehyde dimethyl acetal CH acetaldoxime R acetamide M (LC) acetamidinium chloride R acetamidoacrylic acid 2- NB acetamidobenzaldehyde p- R acetamidobenzenesulfonyl chloride 4- R acetamidodeoxythioglucopyranose triacetate 2- -2- -1- -β-D- 3,4,6- AB acetamidomethylthiazole 2- -4- PB acetanilide M (LC) acetazolamide R acetdimethylamide see dimethylacetamide, N,N- acethydrazide R acetic acid M (solv) acetic anhydride M (FC) acetmethylamide see methylacetamide, N- acetoacetamide R acetoacetanilide R acetoacetic acid, lithium salt R acetobromoglucose -α-D- NB acetohydroxamic acid R acetoin R acetol (hydroxyacetone) R acetonaphthalide (α)R acetone M (solv) acetone ,A.R. M (solv) acetone-d6 RM acetone cyanohydrin R acetonedicarboxylic acid ,dimethyl ester R acetonedicarboxylic acid -1,3- R acetone dimethyl acetal see dimethoxypropane 2,2- acetonitrile M (solv) acetonitrile-d3 RM acetonylacetone see hexanedione 2,5- acetonylbenzylhydroxycoumarin (3-(α- -4- R acetophenone M (LC) acetophenone oxime R acetophenone trimethylsilyl enol ether see phenyltrimethylsilyl... acetoxyacetone (oxopropyl acetate 2-) R acetoxybenzoic acid 4- DS acetoxynaphthoic acid 6- -2- R 2 acetylacetaldehyde dimethylacetal R acetylacetone (pentanedione -2,4-) M (C) acetylbenzonitrile p- R acetylbiphenyl 4- see phenylacetophenone, p- acetyl bromide M (FC) acetylbromothiophene 2- -5-
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ)
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/14/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-07794, and on govinfo.gov BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [B-21-2020] Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 70 – Detroit, Michigan, Notification of Proposed Production Activity, Pacific Industrial Development Corporation (Zeolites, Specialty Alumina Products, Rare Earth Powders and Aqueous Solutions), Ann Arbor, Michigan Greater Detroit Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc., grantee of FTZ 70, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Pacific Industrial Development Corporation (PIDC), located in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on April 6, 2020. The PIDC facility is located within FTZ 70. The facility is used for the production of zeolites, specialty alumina products, rare earth powders and aqueous solutions for use in a variety of industries. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status materials and components and specific finished products described in the submitted notification (as described below) and subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board. Production under FTZ procedures could exempt PIDC from customs duty payments on the foreign-status components used in export production. On its domestic sales, for the foreign-status materials/components noted below, PIDC would be able to choose the duty rates
    [Show full text]
  • Isoamyl Acetate
    SUMMARY OF DATA FOR CHEMICAL SELECTION Isoamyl Acetate CAS No. 123-92-2 Prepared for NTP by Technical Resources International, Inc Prepared on 11/94 Under NCI Contract No. N01-CP-56019 Table of Contents I. Chemical Identification II. Exposure Information Table 1. Levels of isoamyl acetate reported in foods III. Evidence for Possible Carcinogenic Activity Appendix A: Structural Analogs of Isoamyl Acetate IV. References SUMMARY OF DATA FOR CHEMICAL SELECTION CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION CAS Registry No.: 123-92-2 Chem. Abstr. Name: 1-Butanol, 3-methyl-, acetate Synonyms: Acetic acid 3-methylbutyl ester; acetic acid, isopentyl ester; AI3-00576; banana oil; isoamyl ethanoate; isopentyl acetate; isopentyl alcohol, acetate; pear oil; 3-methyl-1-butanol acetate; 3-methyl-1-butyl acetate; 3-methylbutyl acetate; 3-methylbutyl ethanoate; i-amyl acetate Structure: Molecular Formula and Molecular Weight: C7H14O2 Mol. Wt.: 130.18 Chemical and Physical Properties: Description: Colorless, flammable liquid with a banana-like odor (ACGIH, 1993). Boiling Point: 142°C (Lide, 1993) Melting Point: -78.5°C (Mark, et al, 1984; Lide, 1993) Solubility: Soluble in water (2000 mg/L at 25°C) (Howard, 1990); soluble in ethanol, diethyl ether, and acetone (Lide, 1993). Vapor 4.5 mm Hg at 20°C (Howard, 1990) Pressure: Refractive 1.4003 (Lide, 1993) Index: Flash Point: closed cup, 33°C; open cup, 38°:C (Budavari, 1989) Density: 0.876 (Lewis, 1993) Reactivity: Thermal decomposition of isoamyl acetate may produce acrid fumes. Contact with strong oxidizing agents, strong acids, and alkaline materials should be avoided (Haarmann & Reimer Corp., 1994). Hazardous decomposition products of isoamyl acetate include CO and CO2 (AESAR/Alfa, 1994) Log 2.13 (Howard, 1990) P(octanol/water partition coefficient): Technical Isoamyl acetate is commercially available as both a natural and synthetic product with a purity Products and range of 95-99+%.
    [Show full text]
  • Compound Formula Tin (II) Nitride Silver Oxide Lithium Sulfide Magnesium Sulfide
    Ionic Bonding Drill Write the correct formula for the following compounds Compound Formula tin (II) nitride silver oxide lithium sulfide magnesium sulfide copper (I) nitride AgCl boron iodide potassium fluoride copper (I) chloride is CuCl iron (II) oxide is FeO tin (IV) fluoride is SnF4 nickel (II) fluoride is NiF2 lead (IV) oxide is PbO2 silver chloride is calcium iodide is CaI2 potassium bromide sodium phosphide iron (II) chloride copper (I) bromide lead (II) sulfide lead (IV) nitride beryllium nitride potassium bromide is KBr sodium phosphide is Na3P iron (II) chloride is FeCl2 copper (I) bromide is CuBr lead (II) sulfide is PbS lead (IV) nitride is Pb3N4 beryllium nitride is Be3N2 copper (I) chloride iron (II) oxide tin (IV) fluoride nickel (II) fluoride lead (IV) oxide Ag2O silver chloride calcium iodide Answers copper (I) nitride is Cu3N boron iodide is BI3 potassium fluoride is KF silver oxide is lithium sulfide is Li2S magnesium sulfide is MgS tin (II) nitride is Sn3N2 Ionic Bonding Drill Write the correct formula for the following compounds Compound Formula lithium bromide sodium sulfide lead (II) chloride nickel (II) oxide AlBr3 copper (II) oxide AlI3 iron (II) fluoride tin (II) oxide iron (II) oxide is FeO lead (II) oxide is PbO aluminum bromide is potassium oxide is K2O potassium oxide is K2O aluminum iodide is lead (II) nitride is Pb3N2 tin (IV) sulfide iron (III) sulfide lead (II) nitride copper (II) oxide silver fluoride AgF sodium chloride magnesium bromide tin (IV) sulfide is SnS2 iron (III) sulfide is Fe2S3 lead (II)
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Data Sheet
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Creation Date 27-Aug-2013 Revision Date 14-Feb-2020 Revision Number 2 1. Identification Product Name Cadmium bromide, ultra dry Cat No. : 47105 CAS-No 7789-72-6 Synonyms No information available Recommended Use Laboratory chemicals. Uses advised against Food, drug, pesticide or biocidal product use. Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Company Alfa Aesar Thermo Fisher Scientific Chemicals, Inc. 30 Bond Street Ward Hill, MA 01835-8099 Tel: 800-343-0660 Fax: 800-322-4757 Email: [email protected] www.alfa.com Emergency Telephone Number During normal business hours (Monday-Friday, 8am-7pm EST), call (800) 343-0660. After normal business hours, call Carechem 24 at (866) 928-0789. 2. Hazard(s) identification Classification This chemical is considered hazardous by the 2012 OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) Acute oral toxicity Category 4 Acute dermal toxicity Category 4 Acute Inhalation Toxicity - Dusts and Mists Category 4 Carcinogenicity Category 1A Label Elements Signal Word Danger Hazard Statements May cause cancer Harmful if swallowed, in contact with skin or if inhaled ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 / 7 Cadmium bromide, ultra dry Revision Date 14-Feb-2020 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ Precautionary Statements Prevention Obtain special instructions before use Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood Use personal protective equipment
    [Show full text]
  • Pp-03-25-New Dots.Qxd 10/23/02 2:16 PM Page 136
    pp-03-25-new dots.qxd 10/23/02 2:16 PM Page 136 136 BROMIC ACID / BROMINE BROMIC ACID [7789–31–3] Formula: HBrO3; MW 128.91 Uses Bromic acid is used as an oxidizing agent; and also as intermediate in the preparation of dyes and pharmaceuticals . Physical Properties Unstable compound; stable only in dilute aqueous solutions; solution turns yellow on standing; decomposes when heated to 100°C. Preparation Bromic acid is prepared by adding sulfuric acid to barium bromate. Ba(BrO3)2 + H2SO4 → 2HBrO3 + BaSO4 The product is distilled and absorbed in water. A 50% solution may be obtained by slow evaporation of the dilute solution in vacuum at –12°C. Toxicity Contact with skin and eyes can cause severe irritation. BROMINE [7726–95–6] Symbol Br; atomic number 35; atomic weight 79.904; a halogen group ele- ment; electron affinity 3.36359 eV; electronegativity 2.8; electron configura- tion [Ar] 3d104s24p5; most stable valence states –1 and +5, less stable valence states +1 and +3; a diatomic molecule (Br2) in liquid and vapor states over a wide range of temperature; two stable isotopes, Br–79 (50.57%) and Br–81 (49.43%). Occurrence and Uses Bromine occurs in nature as bromide in many natural brine wells and salt deposits. It also is found in seawater at a concentration of 85 mg/L. The ele- ment was discovered by A. J. Balard and C. Lowig, independently in 1826. Bromine is used in bleaching fibers and as a disinfectant for water purifica- tion. Other applications are in organic synthesis as an oxidizing or brominat- ing agent; in the manufacture of ethylene dibromide, methyl bromide and other bromo compounds for dyes and pharmaceutical uses; as a fire retardant for plastics; and in chemical analysis.
    [Show full text]