DOCSLIB.ORG

， the ， Etc. ， In- ， This

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

September 1957 Journ. .J ap. Bo t. Vo l. 32 No. 9 275 Tuguo TATEOKA*: MisceUaneous papers on the phylogeny of Poaceae (10). Proposition of a new phylogenetic system of Poaceae 料 館岡亜緒ホイネ科の系統分類に関する雑記(1 0) イネ科新分類系の提案林 Based on the considerations described in the previous papers of this series ， the classification classification and genealogical tree of Poaceae are presented in Table 1 and Fig. l. The relationships among tribes according to my conjecture are more clearly shown in in Table 2. Table 3 is the list of ]apanese grasses classified according to this view. The importance of chromosome con 白guration in the systematics of grass groups was for the first time revealed by Avdulov (1931) ，who gave an impulse to syste- matic investigations of grasses bγintroducing the characteristics of chromosomes as a systematic criterion. While Avdulov's work is monumental ， in the light of our present present knowledge his belief in stability of chromosomes as to number and size should make place to a more flexible view. Variation of the karyotype among individuals individuals of the same species ，spontaneous chromosome breakage ， variation of chromosomes within the same individual ， the presence of B-chromosomes ，etc. ，in- dicate dicate the flexibility of the chromosome numbers and sizes. This makes it neces- sary sary to revise Avdulov's views in several instances. For example ，Avdulov (1. c.) includes includes tbe genus Brachypodium in Poatae-Phragmitiformes which is clearly dif- ferent ferent from Festuceae-Bromeae ，on the ground that this genus possesses small chromosomes and the basic number is not 7. According to my grouping ， this systematic systematic treatment is inadequate. The nuclear plates of Poa annua Linn. (2n= 28) ，a member of Festuceae ， include several small chromosomes similar to Brachy- podium chromosomes ，and such small chromosomes are also found in the chromo- somes sets of. P. .n 争ponica Koidz. (2n=42 ， 56) which is closely allied to P. annua Linn. Linn. Most plants belonging to Festuceae have large- to medium-sized chromo- somes ，and it is quite possible that the small chromosomes in Brachypodium have developed from the chromosomes of the former type. If the chromosomes number and size we 閃 so stable as maintained by Avdulov ，Brachypodium)hould be included in in Phragmitiformes. However ， in view of various other features possessed by ホ National Institute of Genetics. Mishima. Shizuoka Pre f. 国立遺伝学研挺所. 林 Contτibutions from the National Institute of Genetics. No. 215. - 19- 276 植物研究雑譜第32 巻第9 号 昭和 32 年 9 月 Brachypodium ， this genus should be most naturally referred to Festuceae ，and it~ chromosome configuration should have been derived from some ancestral chromo- some type which resembled that of the typical festucoid genera. Subsequently ， karyological karyological investigations of grasses have been carried out by many cytologists ， although no noteworthy study ot ・karyosystematics of Poaceae have been published. These data should be reexamined from a more recent view point. The characteristics in leaf structure are another valuable criterion in the syste- matics of Poaceae. Avdulov (1931) has reviewed the studies of leaf structure in grasses ，and divided it into two tγpes ，1 and II. Prat (1936) ，based on his OW Jl Table 1. The classification o[ Poaceae according to the present author. Subfam. Pharoideae Beet1e 持 Trib. Danthonieae C. E. Hubbard 呪ー Trib. Trib. Anomoch10eae C. E. Hubbard Trib. Garnotieae Tateoka 持持長持 Trib. Trib. Streptochaeteae C. E. Hubbard Trib. Arundinelleae Stapi ・ Trib. Trib. Bambuseae Nees Subfam. Pooideae A. Br. Trib. Trib. Olvreae Kunth Trib. Festuceae Dumor t. Trib. Trib. Oryzeae Kunth Trib. Monermcae C. E. Hubbard Trib. Trib. Phyllorachieae C. E. Hubbard Trib. Triticeae Dumort. Trib. Trib. Pariancae D. E. Hubbard Trib. Agrosteae Nees -K-時長兼 Trib. Trib. Micraireae Pi1ger Subfam. Eragrostoideae Pi1ger Subfam. Arundoideae Tateoka 長持 Trib. Spartineae C. E. Hubbard 骨 Trib. Trib. Coleantheae Ascher. & Graebn. Trib. Chlorideae Kunth Trib. Trib. Brachelytreae Ohwi Trib. Lappagineae Link Trib. Trib. Stipeae Nees Trib. Pappophoreae Kunth Trib. Trib. Aristideae Hubbard & Vaugham Subfam. Panicoideae A. B r. Trib. Trib. Meliceae Fries Trib. Lecomtelleae Pilger Trib. Trib. Glycerieae C. E. Hubbard 長 Trib. Bovinelleae A. Camus Trib. Trib. Nardeae Reichenb. Trib. Anthephoreae Pilger Trib. Trib. Lygeeae Lange Trib. Melinideae Hitchcock Trib. Trib. Centotheceae Roshcv. Trib. Trachyeae Pilger Trib. Trib. Streptogyneae C. E. Hubbard Trib. Isachneae Benth. Trib. Trib. Ehrhau:ae Tateoka" ー是非 Trib. Paniceae R. Br. Trib. Trib. Phaenospermeae Roshev. Trib. Andropogoneae PresL Trib. Trib. Arundineae Reichenb. Trib. Maydeae Mathieu Trib. Trib. Thysanolaeneae C. E. Hubbard - 20- 円、 LU lQJ 57 υeD&EL en 、a er 且 .J ourn. Jap. Bot. Vo l. 32 No. 9 277 observations ， divided the leaf structure of grasses into the Festucoid type and the /~anicoid type including the Panicoid subtype ， Chloridoid subtype and ..Bambusoid subtype. subtype. Avdulov's Type 1 and Prat's Panicoid tγpe are seemingly similar ，though rather rather dissimilar in reality. The same is true of Type II and the Festucoid type. Prat's Prat's Panicoid type includes Avdulov's Type ! and a part of Type II ，and Prat's Festucoid Festucoid type corresponds with Avdulov's Type II partly. The members whose leaf leaf structures have been referred to Type II by Avdulov and to Panicoid type by Prat Prat are Phragmites ，Arundo and Uniola. While in the typical Panicoid type the chloroplasts chloroplasts are localized in an outer bundle sheath surrounding the vascular bundles ， the bundles in Phragmites ，'Arundo and Uniola are surrounded by an 持 Sine descrip 1. la 1. Subfam. Pharoideae Beetle in Bul l. Tor r. Bo t. Club 29: 360 ， 1950. 1950. T 1' ib. Glyce 1' ieae C. E. Hubba 1' d in Grasses ， p. 401 ， 1954. Trib. Danthonieae c. c. E. Hubbard in J. Hutch.'s Brit. F l. P 1.， p. 307 ， 1948. Trib. Spartineae C. E. Hubbard in G 1' asses ， p. 401 ， 1954. 州 Subfamilia Arundoideae Tateoka ，sub f. nov. ・-Spicula uni- vel plu 1' iflo 1' a， saepe floribus floribus superio 1' ibus reductis sed in speciebus paucis eis inferioribus impe 1' fectis ， stig ll.J. atibus saepe dense et minute plumosis ， staminibus 3 vel paucio 1' ibus interdum 6. 6. Numerus chromosomatis saepe b= 12 ，11 ， vel 10. Characte 1' istics of t1' ansverse leaf leaf section are mostly festucoid or bambusoid ，a few panicoid. Epide 1' mal features are are panicoid 0 1' festucoid. 特長特 T 1' ibus Ehrharteae Tateoka ，t 1' ib. nov.-Spiculae pedicellatae ，lateralite 1' compressae ，t 1' iflo 1' ae ，rach i1l a supra glumas non articulata; 臼o1' es inferiores 2 steri- 1e s; eius summus tantum fe 1' tilis. Lemmata sterilia quam glumae longio 1' a. Lem- ma fertile interdum basi appendiculatum; appendice subnodifo 1' mi cum ea lemmatis supe 1' io 1' is ca 1' donem fo 1' mante. Paleae angustea ，costatae ，1・ ve12 ・nervosae. Stamina 6，4. ， 3， 2， vel 1. Genera 3 includenda: Ehrharta Thunb. (Typus) ，Jt licrolaena R. Br. Br. et Tetr αγ， rhena R. Br. 州制 Tribus Garnotieae Tateoka ， trib. nov ，-SBiculae uniflorae; pili calli basi spiculae spiculae siti recti ， breves longive ，plerumque torti; rachilla pone paleam non pro- jecta. jecta. Glumae 2，memb 1' anceae interdum rigidio 1' es 司 trinervatae ， apice acutae usque acuminatae ra 1' o obtusae. Lemmata glabra ，laevia ， raro ad apicem minute scabrida ， convexa ， tenuiter 3・nervo 叫 apice a 1' istata (sed rarissime mutica). Paleae hyalinae ， 子nervatae ，secundum nervum carinatae. Flores he 1' maphroditi ， lodiculus parvis ， antheris antheris 3， ovario glabro ， stylo distincto ， stigmatibus 2 plumosis. Caryopsides fere lineari-oblongae ， scutello ad 1/3 caryopsidis extenso. Genus unicum includendum: Garnotia Brongn. 制却制 Pilger (1954) included within Aveneae (sens. lat.) the genera which had been treated as members of Agros[eae sens. st r. as well as the gene 1' a of Aveneae sens. sens. str. But ， in 1942 Ohwi has taken the same systematic grouping as Agrosteae Nees. Nees. According to the rule of nomenclature ，Ohwi's treatment must be adopted. - 21 - 278 278 植物研究雑誌第32 巻第9 号 昭和 32 年 9 月 outer outer sheath lacking chloroplasts which are uniformly distributed throghout. the mesophy Jl. 1 (1956a) have reexamined the 'grasses in Prat's materials ， as well .as other other ]apanese and American grasses ，and obtained similar resUlts to those of the previous previous investigators except for the finding of peculiar features of leaf anatomγ in in Arundinella hirta Tanaka. While Prat's results are very interesting and impor- tant tant for the systematics of Poaceae ， the leaf structures of many species or species groups had remained unknown. Such species or species groups have been studied 〆 " ， ーー- 町.._ _- -ーーーーー' PRAROIDEAE Fig. Fig. 1. Diagram showi 白g the phylogeny of.. Poaceae according to ~the present autho t" - 22 ー September 1957 Journ. Jap. Bot. Vo l. 32 No. 9 279 bγvarious subsequent investigators ，such as Potztal (1952 ，1953) ，Hansen and Potztal Potztal (1954) ，Page (1947) ，de Wet (1954 ，1956) ，Tateoka (1956b ，k， 1， 1957c ，d ，e， f) ， etc. etc. These investigations have yielded discoveries which are valuable for the syste- matlcs matlcs of Poaceae ，and established the systematic significance of this character. The systematic importance of anatomy of embrγo in mature caryopsis which was pointed out by Van Tieghem has been verified by Reeder (1953) The features of of the first leaf in the seedlings are also useful for the systematics 0 1' Poaceae. Besides ， various other characters: the features of root-hair development ，endosperm starch.grains ， etc. are of systematic value (c f. Stebbins 1956). Some of these char- acters acters in various grasses of problematic position have remaiiled unknown. To me ， the two characters~ chromosomes and leaf structure ，seem to be especially useful for the the systematics of Poaceae at present. Thus ， the discussions are primarily based on these these two characters as well as the external morphology and distribution of the plants.
Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • Flora of China 22: 645–646. 2006. 220. EREMOCHLOA Buse In

    Flora of China 22: 645–646. 2006. 220. EREMOCHLOA Buse In

    Flora of China 22: 645–646. 2006. 220. EREMOCHLOA Buse in Miquel, Pl. Jungh. 357. 1854. 蜈蚣草属 wu gong cao shu Sun Bixing (孙必兴 Sun Bi-sin); Sylvia M. Phillips Perennial, tufted, stoloniferous or rhizomatous. Leaves mostly basal, leaf blades linear, flat or folded; ligule short, membranous. Inflorescence a single terminal raceme; raceme strongly flattened, spikelets overlapping along one side, disarticulating very tardily; rachis internodes narrowly clavate, nodes ciliate (in China), base truncate, sometimes with a low central peg. Sessile spikelet longer than rachis internode; lower glume elliptic-ovate to oblong, papery to leathery, 5–9-veined, marginally 2-keeled, keels pectinately spiny, often winged at apex; upper glume 3-veined, keeled along midvein, otherwise almost flat, often narrowly winged on lower keel; lower floret staminate, palea present; upper floret bisexual, upper lemma entire, awnless. Pedicelled spikelet absent or repre- sented by a small bristle; pedicel free from and longer than adjacent internode, subulate to narrowly ovoid or leaflike. Eleven species: India to SE Asia and Australia; five species in China. This genus is easily recognizable by its distinctive inflorescence. The solitary, terminal, 1-sided raceme of closely overlapping spikelets does not break up readily into segments, and most species have spikelets with conspicuous, long spines along their margins. 1a. Plant with elongate stolons or rhizomes; lower glume broadly winged at apex. 2a. Keels with very short inconspicuous spines ....................................................................................................... 1. E. ophiuroides 2b. Keels with long conspicuous spines ....................................................................................................................... 2. E. muricata 1b. Plant tufted; lower glume narrowly winged or wingless. 3a. Lower glume of sessile spikelet usually wingless, often pubescent on back ...........................................................
  • Published Vestigations Together Study Existing Accept Arrangements

    Published Vestigations Together Study Existing Accept Arrangements

    Notes on the Nomenclature of some grasses II by Dr. J.Th. Henrard (Rijksherbarium, Leiden) (Issued September 10th, 1941). In a former article new combinations and critical observa- 1) many all the world. New in- tions were published on various grasses over vestigations in critical genera together with the study of the existing literature made it necessary to accept various other arrangements in this important family. The old system of Bentham, once the basis for a total is and modified and review, now more more many tribes are and limited. The have purified more exactly most recent system we at the moment, is Hubbard’s treatment of this family in the work of Hutchinson: The families of flowering plants. Vol. II. Monocotyle- dons. The grasses are divided there into 26 tribes. We have here the great advantage that aberrant which are into genera, not easy to place one of the formerly accepted tribes, are given as representatives of distinct new tribes. The curious tropical genus Streptochaeta f.i. con- stitutes the tribe of the Streptochaeteae. It is quite acceptable that tribes consist of but may one genus, especially when such a genus is a totally deviating one and cannot be inserted into one of the already existing ones. Such tribes are f.i. the Nardeae with the only northern genus Nardus, and the Mediterranean tribe of the Lygeeae with the only genus Lygeum, one of the Esparto grasses. It is therefore wonder no that Hubbard creates a new tribe, the Anomochloeae, for one of the most curious tropical grasses of the world.
  • (Gramineae) Background Concerned, It

    (Gramineae) Background Concerned, It

    BLUMEA 31 (1986) 281-307 Generic delimitationof Rottboelliaand related genera (Gramineae) J.F. Veldkamp R. de Koning & M.S.M. Sosef Rijksherbarium,Leiden, The Netherlands Summary Generic delimitations within the Rottboelliastrae Stapf and Coelorachidastrae Clayton (for- mal name) are revised. Coelorachis Brongn., Hackelochloa O. Ktze, Heteropholis C.E. Hubb., in Ratzeburgia Kunth, and Rottboellia formosa R. Br, are to be included Mnesithea Kunth. Heteropholis cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton and its variety chenii (Hsu) Sosef & Koning are varieties of Mnesithea laevis (Retz.) Kunth. Robynsiochloa Jacq.-Félix is to be included in Rottboellia L.f. The necessary new combinations, a list of genera and representative species, and a key to the genera are given. In the Appendix a new species of Rottboellia, R. paradoxa Koning & Sosef, is described from the Philippines. The enigmatic species Rottboellia villosa Poir. is transferred to Schizachyrium villosum (Poir.) Veldk., comb. nov. Introduction Historical background The of the within the of taxa delimitation genera group represented by Rottboel- lia L. f. and its closest relatives, here taken in the sense of Clayton (1973), has always posed a considerable problem. former In times Rottboellia contained many species. It was divided up in various the of Hackel seemed most ways, but system 5 subgenera as proposed by (1889) authoritative: Coelorachis (Brongn.) Hack., Hemarthria (R. Br.) Hack., Peltophorus (Desv.) HackPhacelurus (Griseb.) Hack., and Thyrsostachys Hack. When at the end of the last century and in the beginning of the present one many large grass genera were split up, e.g. Andropogon, Panicum, Stapf (1917) raised Hackel's subgenera to generic rank, reviving some old names formerly treated as synonyms, and created several new of the of other unable finish his ones.
  • Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017

    Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017

    Broadleaf Woodoats (Chasmanthium latifolia) Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017 1 Introduction This 5 hour workshop is an introduction to the identification of grasses using hands- on dissection of diverse species found within the Texas middle Gulf Coast region (although most have a distribution well into the state and beyond). By the allotted time period the student should have acquired enough knowledge to identify most grass species in Texas to at least the genus level. For the sake of brevity grass physiology and reproduction will not be discussed. Materials provided: Dried specimens of grass species for each student to dissect Jewelry loupe 30x pocket glass magnifier Battery-powered, flexible USB light Dissecting tweezer and needle Rigid white paper background Handout: - Grass Plant Morphology - Types of Grass Inflorescences - Taxonomic description and habitat of each dissected species. - Key to all grass species of Texas - References - Glossary Itinerary (subject to change) 0900: Introduction and house keeping 0905: Structure of the course 0910: Identification and use of grass dissection tools 0915- 1145: Basic structure of the grass Identification terms Dissection of grass samples 1145 – 1230: Lunch 1230 - 1345: Field trip of area and collection by each student of one fresh grass species to identify back in the classroom. 1345 - 1400: Conclusion and discussion 2 Grass Structure spikelet pedicel inflorescence rachis culm collar internode ------ leaf blade leaf sheath node crown fibrous roots 3 Grass shoot. The above ground structure of the grass. Root. The below ground portion of the main axis of the grass, without leaves, nodes or internodes, and absorbing water and nutrients from the soil.
  • The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014

    The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014

    The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014 In the pages that follow are treatments that have been revised since the publication of the Jepson eFlora, Revision 1 (July 2013). The information in these revisions is intended to supersede that in the second edition of The Jepson Manual (2012). The revised treatments, as well as errata and other small changes not noted here, are included in the Jepson eFlora (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html). For a list of errata and small changes in treatments that are not included here, please see: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/JM12_errata.html Citation for the entire Jepson eFlora: Jepson Flora Project (eds.) [year] Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html [accessed on month, day, year] Citation for an individual treatment in this supplement: [Author of taxon treatment] 2014. [Taxon name], Revision 2, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, [URL for treatment]. Accessed on [month, day, year]. Copyright © 2014 Regents of the University of California Supplement II, Page 1 Summary of changes made in Revision 2 of the Jepson eFlora, December 2014 PTERIDACEAE *Pteridaceae key to genera: All of the CA members of Cheilanthes transferred to Myriopteris *Cheilanthes: Cheilanthes clevelandii D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris clevelandii (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes cooperae D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris cooperae (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes covillei Maxon changed to Myriopteris covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve, as native Cheilanthes feei T. Moore changed to Myriopteris gracilis Fée, as native Cheilanthes gracillima D.
  • IAPT Chromosome Data 28

    IAPT Chromosome Data 28

    TAXON 67 (6) • December 2018: 1235–1245 Marhold & Kučera (eds.) • IAPT chromosome data 28 IAPT CHROMOSOME DATA IAPT chromosome data 28 Edited by Karol Marhold & Jaromír Kučera DOI https://doi.org/10.12705/676.39 Julio Rubén Daviña & Ana Isabel Honfi* Chromosome numbers counted by L. Delgado and ploidy level estimated by B. Rojas-Andrés and N. López-González; collectors: Programa de Estudios Florísticos y Genética Vegetal, Instituto AA = Antonio Abad, AT = Andreas Tribsch, BR = Blanca Rojas- de Biología Subtropical CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Andrés, DGL = David Gutiérrez Larruscain, DP = Daniel Pinto, JASA Misiones, nodo Posadas, Rivadavia 2370, 3300 Posadas, Argentina = José Ángel Sánchez Agudo, JPG = Julio Peñas de Giles, LMC = * Author for correspondence: [email protected] Luz Mª Muñoz Centeno, MO = M. Montserrat Martínez-Ortega, MS = María Santos Vicente, NLG = Noemí López-González, NPG = This study was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Nélida Padilla-García, SA = Santiago Andrés, SB = Sara Barrios, VL Científica y Técnica (ANPCyT) grant nos. PICT-2014-2218 and PICT- = Víctor Lucía, XG = Ximena Giráldez. 2016-1637, and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET). This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (projects CGL2009-07555, CGL2012- All materials CHN; collectors: D = J.R. Daviña, H = A.I. Honfi, 32574, Flora iberica VIII [CGL2008-02982-C03-02/CLI], Flora L = B. Leuenberger. iberica IX [CGL2011-28613-C03-03], Flora iberica X [CGL2014- 52787-C3-2-P]); the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación AMARYLLIDACEAE (Ph.D. grants to BR and NLG), and the University of Salamanca Habranthus barrosianus Hunz.
  • Seedimages Species Database List

    Seedimages Species Database List

    Seedimages.com Scientific List (possibly A. cylindrica) Agropyron trachycaulum Ambrosia artemisifolia (R) not Abelmoschus esculentus Agrostemma githago a synonym of A. trifida Abies concolor Agrostis alba Ambrosia confertiflora Abronia villosa Agrostis canina Ambrosia dumosa Abronia villosum Agrostis capillaris Ambrosia grayi Abutilon theophrasti Agrostis exarata Ambrosia psilostachya Acacia mearnsii Agrostis gigantea Ambrosia tomentosa Acaena anserinifolia Agrostis palustris Ambrosia trifida (L) Acaena novae-zelandiae Agrostis stolonifera Ammi majus Acaena sanguisorbae Agrostis tenuis Ammobium alatum Acalypha virginica Aira caryophyllea Amorpha canescens Acamptopappus sphaerocephalus Alcea ficifolia Amsinckia intermedia Acanthospermum hispidum Alcea nigra Amsinckia tessellata Acer rubrum Alcea rosea Anagallis arvensis Achillea millifolium Alchemilla mollis Anagallis monellii Achnatherum brachychaetum Alectra arvensis Anaphalis margaritacea Achnatherum hymenoides Alectra aspera Andropogon bicornis Acmella oleracea Alectra fluminensis Andropogon flexuosus Acroptilon repens Alectra melampyroides Andropogon gerardii Actaea racemosa Alhagi camelorum Andropogon gerardii var. Adenostoma fasciculatum Alhagi maurorum paucipilus Aegilops cylindrica Alhagi pseudalhagi Andropogon hallii Aegilops geniculata subsp. Allium canadense Andropogon ternarius geniculata Allium canadense (bulb) Andropogon virginicus Aegilops ovata Allium cepa Anemone canadensis Aegilops triuncialis Allium cernuum Anemone cylindrica Aeginetia indica Allium fistulosum Anemone
  • FINAL REPORT PSRA Vegetation Monitoring 2005-2006 PC P502173

    FINAL REPORT PSRA Vegetation Monitoring 2005-2006 PC P502173

    Rare Plants and Their Locations at Picayune Strand Restoration Area: Task 4a FINAL REPORT PSRA Vegetation Monitoring 2005-2006 PC P502173 Steven W. Woodmansee and Michael J. Barry [email protected] December 20, 2006 Submitted by The Institute for Regional Conservation 22601 S.W. 152 Avenue, Miami, Florida 33170 George D. Gann, Executive Director Submitted to Mike Duever, Ph.D. Senior Environmental Scientist South Florida Water Management District Fort Myers Service Center 2301 McGregor Blvd. Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Table of Contents Introduction 03 Methods 03 Results and Discussion 05 Acknowledgements 38 Citations 39 Tables: Table 1: Rare plants recorded in the vicinity of the Vegetation Monitoring Transects 05 Table 2: The Vascular Plants of Picayune Strand State Forest 24 Figures: Figure 1: Picayune Strand Restoration Area 04 Figure 2: PSRA Rare Plants: Florida Panther NWR East 13 Figure 3: PSRA Rare Plants: Florida Panther NWR West 14 Figure 4: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Northeast 15 Figure 5: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Northwest 16 Figure 6: PSRA Rare Plants: FSPSP West 17 Figure 7: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Southeast 18 Figure 8: PSRA Rare Plants: PSSF Southwest 19 Figure 9: PSRA Rare Plants: FSPSP East 20 Figure 10: PSRA Rare Plants: TTINWR 21 Cover Photo: Bulbous adder’s tongue (Ophioglossum crotalophoroides), a species newly recorded for Collier County, and ranked as Critically Imperiled in South Florida by The Institute for Regional Conservation taken by the primary author. 2 Introduction The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) plans on restoring the hydrology at Picayune Strand Restoration Area (PSRA) see Figure 1.
  • Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences

    Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences

    d i v e r s i t y , p h y l o g e n y , a n d e v o l u t i o n i n t h e monocotyledons e d i t e d b y s e b e r g , p e t e r s e n , b a r f o d & d a v i s a a r h u s u n i v e r s i t y p r e s s , d e n m a r k , 2 0 1 0 Phylogenetics of Stipeae (Poaceae: Pooideae) Based on Plastid and Nuclear DNA Sequences Konstantin Romaschenko,1 Paul M. Peterson,2 Robert J. Soreng,2 Núria Garcia-Jacas,3 and Alfonso Susanna3 1M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, Tereshchenkovska 2, 01601 Kiev, Ukraine 2Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany MRC-166, National Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, District of Columbia 20013-7012 USA. 3Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, Botanic Institute of Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Pg. del Migdia, s.n., E08038 Barcelona, Spain Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Abstract—The Stipeae tribe is a group of 400−600 grass species of worldwide distribution that are currently placed in 21 genera. The ‘needlegrasses’ are char- acterized by having single-flowered spikelets and stout, terminally-awned lem- mas. We conducted a molecular phylogenetic study of the Stipeae (including all genera except Anemanthele) using a total of 94 species (nine species were used as outgroups) based on five plastid DNA regions (trnK-5’matK, matK, trnHGUG-psbA, trnL5’-trnF, and ndhF) and a single nuclear DNA region (ITS).
  • Flora of China 22: 647–648. 2006. 222. OPHIUROS C. F. Gaertner

    Flora of China 22: 647–648. 2006. 222. OPHIUROS C. F. Gaertner

    Flora of China 22: 647–648. 2006. 222. OPHIUROS C. F. Gaertner, Suppl. Carp. 3. 1805. 蛇尾草属 she wei cao shu Sun Bixing (孙必兴 Sun Bi-sin); Sylvia M. Phillips Annual or perennial. Culms robust. Leaf blades linear, flat; ligule membranous. Inflorescence of many single racemes ag- gregated into a spathate compound panicle; racemes cylindrical, fragile, transversely or slightly obliquely articulated, spikelets borne alternately on opposite sides of rachis; rachis internodes stout, semi-cylindrical, base with central peg, apex hollow. Sessile spikelet sunk into hollow in rachis; lower glume oblong, leathery, broadly convex, smooth, areolate or latticelike; marginally 2-keeled, with or without narrow wings toward apex; lower floret male with a palea; upper floret hyaline with entire awnless lemma. Pedicelled spikelet absent; pedicel linear, adnate to adjacent internode, sometimes barely distinguishable from it. Four species: NE tropical Africa, tropical Asia, Australia; one species in China. 1. Ophiuros exaltatus (Linnaeus) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 2: 780. 1891. 蛇尾草 she wei cao Aegilops exaltata Linnaeus, Mant. Pl. 2: 575. 1771; Mnesithea exaltata (Linnaeus) Skeels; Ophiuros corymbosus (Linnaeus f.) Gaertner; Rottboellia corymbosa Linnaeus f. Perennial. Culms often bulbously swollen at base, erect, 1–2 m tall, 4–6 mm in diam., simple or branched. Leaf sheaths with tubercle-based hairs or glabrous, margins densely ciliate with rather rigid tubercle-based hairs; leaf blades broadly linear, 30–60 × 0.5–2.5 cm, midrib broad and white, margins pecti- nate, base rounded or subcordate, apex long-acuminate; ligule 1–2 mm, glabrous. Racemes often fastigiately clustered, slen- der, 0.5–1.5 cm, base enclosed by a spatheole; rachis very fra- gile, internodes ca.
  • Viruses Virus Diseases Poaceae(Gramineae)

    Viruses Virus Diseases Poaceae(Gramineae)

    Viruses and virus diseases of Poaceae (Gramineae) Viruses The Poaceae are one of the most important plant families in terms of the number of species, worldwide distribution, ecosystems and as ingredients of human and animal food. It is not surprising that they support many parasites including and more than 100 severely pathogenic virus species, of which new ones are being virus diseases regularly described. This book results from the contributions of 150 well-known specialists and presents of for the first time an in-depth look at all the viruses (including the retrotransposons) Poaceae(Gramineae) infesting one plant family. Ta xonomic and agronomic descriptions of the Poaceae are presented, followed by data on molecular and biological characteristics of the viruses and descriptions up to species level. Virus diseases of field grasses (barley, maize, rice, rye, sorghum, sugarcane, triticale and wheats), forage, ornamental, aromatic, wild and lawn Gramineae are largely described and illustrated (32 colour plates). A detailed index Sciences de la vie e) of viruses and taxonomic lists will help readers in their search for information. Foreworded by Marc Van Regenmortel, this book is essential for anyone with an interest in plant pathology especially plant virology, entomology, breeding minea and forecasting. Agronomists will also find this book invaluable. ra The book was coordinated by Hervé Lapierre, previously a researcher at the Institut H. Lapierre, P.-A. Signoret, editors National de la Recherche Agronomique (Versailles-France) and Pierre A. Signoret emeritus eae (G professor and formerly head of the plant pathology department at Ecole Nationale Supérieure ac Agronomique (Montpellier-France). Both have worked from the late 1960’s on virus diseases Po of Poaceae .