Flora of China 22: 647–648. 2006. 222. OPHIUROS C. F. Gaertner

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Flora of China 22: 647–648. 2006. 222. OPHIUROS C. F. Gaertner, Suppl. Carp. 3. 1805. 蛇尾草属 she wei cao shu Sun Bixing (孙必兴 Sun Bi-sin); Sylvia M. Phillips Annual or perennial. Culms robust. Leaf blades linear, flat; ligule membranous. Inflorescence of many single racemes ag- gregated into a spathate compound panicle; racemes cylindrical, fragile, transversely or slightly obliquely articulated, spikelets borne alternately on opposite sides of rachis; rachis internodes stout, semi-cylindrical, base with central peg, apex hollow. Sessile spikelet sunk into hollow in rachis; lower glume oblong, leathery, broadly convex, smooth, areolate or latticelike; marginally 2-keeled, with or without narrow wings toward apex; lower floret male with a palea; upper floret hyaline with entire awnless lemma. Pedicelled spikelet absent; pedicel linear, adnate to adjacent internode, sometimes barely distinguishable from it. Four species: NE tropical Africa, tropical Asia, Australia; one species in China. 1. Ophiuros exaltatus (Linnaeus) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. 2: 780. 1891. 蛇尾草 she wei cao Aegilops exaltata Linnaeus, Mant. Pl. 2: 575. 1771; Mnesithea exaltata (Linnaeus) Skeels; Ophiuros corymbosus (Linnaeus f.) Gaertner; Rottboellia corymbosa Linnaeus f. Perennial. Culms often bulbously swollen at base, erect, 1–2 m tall, 4–6 mm in diam., simple or branched. Leaf sheaths with tubercle-based hairs or glabrous, margins densely ciliate with rather rigid tubercle-based hairs; leaf blades broadly linear, 30–60 × 0.5–2.5 cm, midrib broad and white, margins pecti- nate, base rounded or subcordate, apex long-acuminate; ligule 1–2 mm, glabrous. Racemes often fastigiately clustered, slen- der, 0.5–1.5 cm, base enclosed by a spatheole; rachis very fragile, internodes ca. 3 mm, obliquely articulated. Sessile spikelet 2–3 mm; lower glume ovate-oblong, smooth or areolate on back, sometimes also tuberculate, wingless, apex subacute; upper glume equal to lower glume, boat-shaped. Pedicelled spikelet completely absent; pedicel obscure, free at extreme apex. Fl. and fr. Jun–Oct. Grassy hillsides; below 900 m. Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hai- nan, Yunnan [India, Laos, Malaysia, New Guinea, Philippines, Sri Lan- ka, Thailand, Vietnam; Australia]. Flora of China 22: 647–648. 2006. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

"National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
[Show full text]
Grass Genera in Townsville
Grass Genera in Townsville Nanette B. Hooker Photographs by Chris Gardiner SCHOOL OF MARINE and TROPICAL BIOLOGY JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY TOWNSVILLE QUEENSLAND James Cook University 2012 GRASSES OF THE TOWNSVILLE AREA Welcome to the grasses of the Townsville area. The genera covered in this treatment are those found in the lowland areas around Townsville as far north as Bluewater, south to Alligator Creek and west to the base of Hervey’s Range. Most of these genera will also be found in neighbouring areas although some genera not included may occur in specific habitats. The aim of this book is to provide a description of the grass genera as well as a list of species. The grasses belong to a very widespread and large family called the Poaceae. The original family name Gramineae is used in some publications, in Australia the preferred family name is Poaceae. It is one of the largest flowering plant families of the world, comprising more than 700 genera, and more than 10,000 species. In Australia there are over 1300 species including non-native grasses. In the Townsville area there are more than 220 grass species. The grasses have highly modified flowers arranged in a variety of ways. Because they are highly modified and specialized, there are also many new terms used to describe the various features. Hence there is a lot of terminology that chiefly applies to grasses, but some terms are used also in the sedge family. The basic unit of the grass inflorescence (The flowering part) is the spikelet. The spikelet consists of 1-2 basal glumes (bracts at the base) that subtend 1-many florets or flowers.
[Show full text]
(Gramineae) Background Concerned, It
BLUMEA 31 (1986) 281-307 Generic delimitationof Rottboelliaand related genera (Gramineae) J.F. Veldkamp R. de Koning & M.S.M. Sosef Rijksherbarium,Leiden, The Netherlands Summary Generic delimitations within the Rottboelliastrae Stapf and Coelorachidastrae Clayton (for- mal name) are revised. Coelorachis Brongn., Hackelochloa O. Ktze, Heteropholis C.E. Hubb., in Ratzeburgia Kunth, and Rottboellia formosa R. Br, are to be included Mnesithea Kunth. Heteropholis cochinchinensis (Lour.) Clayton and its variety chenii (Hsu) Sosef & Koning are varieties of Mnesithea laevis (Retz.) Kunth. Robynsiochloa Jacq.-Félix is to be included in Rottboellia L.f. The necessary new combinations, a list of genera and representative species, and a key to the genera are given. In the Appendix a new species of Rottboellia, R. paradoxa Koning & Sosef, is described from the Philippines. The enigmatic species Rottboellia villosa Poir. is transferred to Schizachyrium villosum (Poir.) Veldk., comb. nov. Introduction Historical background The of the within the of taxa delimitation genera group represented by Rottboel- lia L. f. and its closest relatives, here taken in the sense of Clayton (1973), has always posed a considerable problem. former In times Rottboellia contained many species. It was divided up in various the of Hackel seemed most ways, but system 5 subgenera as proposed by (1889) authoritative: Coelorachis (Brongn.) Hack., Hemarthria (R. Br.) Hack., Peltophorus (Desv.) HackPhacelurus (Griseb.) Hack., and Thyrsostachys Hack. When at the end of the last century and in the beginning of the present one many large grass genera were split up, e.g. Andropogon, Panicum, Stapf (1917) raised Hackel's subgenera to generic rank, reviving some old names formerly treated as synonyms, and created several new of the of other unable finish his ones.
[Show full text]
Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017
Broadleaf Woodoats (Chasmanthium latifolia) Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017 1 Introduction This 5 hour workshop is an introduction to the identification of grasses using hands- on dissection of diverse species found within the Texas middle Gulf Coast region (although most have a distribution well into the state and beyond). By the allotted time period the student should have acquired enough knowledge to identify most grass species in Texas to at least the genus level. For the sake of brevity grass physiology and reproduction will not be discussed. Materials provided: Dried specimens of grass species for each student to dissect Jewelry loupe 30x pocket glass magnifier Battery-powered, flexible USB light Dissecting tweezer and needle Rigid white paper background Handout: - Grass Plant Morphology - Types of Grass Inflorescences - Taxonomic description and habitat of each dissected species. - Key to all grass species of Texas - References - Glossary Itinerary (subject to change) 0900: Introduction and house keeping 0905: Structure of the course 0910: Identification and use of grass dissection tools 0915- 1145: Basic structure of the grass Identification terms Dissection of grass samples 1145 – 1230: Lunch 1230 - 1345: Field trip of area and collection by each student of one fresh grass species to identify back in the classroom. 1345 - 1400: Conclusion and discussion 2 Grass Structure spikelet pedicel inflorescence rachis culm collar internode ------ leaf blade leaf sheath node crown fibrous roots 3 Grass shoot. The above ground structure of the grass. Root. The below ground portion of the main axis of the grass, without leaves, nodes or internodes, and absorbing water and nutrients from the soil.
[Show full text]
The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014
The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition Supplement II December 2014 In the pages that follow are treatments that have been revised since the publication of the Jepson eFlora, Revision 1 (July 2013). The information in these revisions is intended to supersede that in the second edition of The Jepson Manual (2012). The revised treatments, as well as errata and other small changes not noted here, are included in the Jepson eFlora (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html). For a list of errata and small changes in treatments that are not included here, please see: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/JM12_errata.html Citation for the entire Jepson eFlora: Jepson Flora Project (eds.) [year] Jepson eFlora, http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html [accessed on month, day, year] Citation for an individual treatment in this supplement: [Author of taxon treatment] 2014. [Taxon name], Revision 2, in Jepson Flora Project (eds.) Jepson eFlora, [URL for treatment]. Accessed on [month, day, year]. Copyright © 2014 Regents of the University of California Supplement II, Page 1 Summary of changes made in Revision 2 of the Jepson eFlora, December 2014 PTERIDACEAE *Pteridaceae key to genera: All of the CA members of Cheilanthes transferred to Myriopteris *Cheilanthes: Cheilanthes clevelandii D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris clevelandii (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes cooperae D. C. Eaton changed to Myriopteris cooperae (D. C. Eaton) Grusz & Windham, as native Cheilanthes covillei Maxon changed to Myriopteris covillei (Maxon) Á. Löve & D. Löve, as native Cheilanthes feei T. Moore changed to Myriopteris gracilis Fée, as native Cheilanthes gracillima D.
[Show full text]
Notes on Grasses (Poaceae) for the Flora of China, IV
Notes on Grasses (Poaceae) for the Flora of China, IV Sylvia M. Phillips Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, United Kingdom. [email protected] Chen Shouliang Herbarium, Jiangsu Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica, 1 Qianghuhuocun, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210014, China. [email protected] ABSTRACT. The following changes are made in the preparation of the grass family account for the Poaceae, necessary for the upcoming Flora of Chi- Flora of China. na. Kengia chinensis is lectotypi®ed on a specimen of K. hackelii, and hence becomes a synonym of the ERAGROSTIDEAE latter. Kengia gracilis is synonymized under K. mu- cronata. Isachne clarkei is lectotypi®ed. Isachne be- Kengia hackelii (Honda) Packer, Bot. Not. 113: neckei (also lectotypi®ed) and I. tenuis are placed 291. 1960. Basionym: Diplachne hackelii Hon- as synonyms of I. clarkei. Isachne albens var. hir- da, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, Sect. 3, Bot. 3: suta is lectotypi®ed and placed as a synonym under 112. 1930. Cleistogenes hackelii (Honda) Hon- I. sylvestris. Isachne semitalis is lectotypi®ed and da, Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 50: 437. 1936. TYPE: placed in synonymy of I. schmidtii. The distinctions Japan. Musashi Prov., Shirako, 1880, Matsu- between the closely related species I. kunthiana, I. mura 4 (holotype, TI). schmidtii, and I. repens are discussed. The new spe- Kengia chinensis (Maximowicz) Packer, Bot. Not. 113: cies Arundinella suniana, from Yunnan province 291. 1960. Basionym: Diplachne serotina var. chi- and related to A. setosa, is described. Arundinella nensis Maximowicz, Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes setosa var. esetosa is validated. The name Arundi- Moscou 54: 70.
[Show full text]
ITCHGRASS (Rottboellia Cochinchinensis) from COSTA RICA1
Molecular basis for resistance to fluazifop-P-butyl in itchgrass ... 143 MOLECULAR BASIS FOR RESISTANCE TO FLUAZIFOP-P-BUTYL IN ITCHGRASS (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) FROM COSTA RICA1 Base Molecular para Resistência a Fluazifop-P-Butyl em Capim-Camalote (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) da Costa Rica CASTILLO-MATAMOROS, R.2, BRENES-ANGULO, A.2, HERRERA-MURILLO, F.3, and GÓMEZ-ALPÍZAR. L.2 ABSTRACT - Rottboellia cochinchinensis is an annual grass weed species known as itchgrass, or “caminadora” in America´s Spanish speaking countries, and has become a major and troublesome weed in several crops. The application of fluazifop-P-butyl at recommended rates (125 g a.i. ha-1) was observed to be failing to control itchgrass in a field in San José, Upala county, Alajuela province, Costa Rica. Plants from the putative resistant R. cochinchinensis population survived fluazifop-P-butyl when treated with 250 g a.i. ha-1 (2X label rate) at the three- to four-leaf stage under greenhouse conditions. PCR amplification and sequencing of partial carboxyl transferase domain (CT) of the acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) gene were used to determine the molecular mechanism of resistance. A single non-synonymous point mutation from TGG (susceptible plants) to TGC (putative resistant plants) that leads to a Trp-2027-Cys substitution was found. This Trp-2027-Cys mutation is known to confer resistance to all aryloxyphenoxyproprionate (APP) herbicides to which fluazifop-P-butyl belongs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of fluazifop-P-butyl resistance and a mutation at position 2027 for a Costa Rican R. cochinchinensis population.
[Show full text]
Mnesithea Granularis
Check List 10(2): 374–375, 2014 © 2014 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution N Mnesithea granularis ISTRIBUTIO (L.) Koning & Sosef: A New Record to D the flora of the Malwa Region, India RAPHIC G K. L. Meena EO [email protected] Department of Botany, MLV Government College, Bhilwara (Rajasthan) - 311 001. G N E- mail: O Abstract: A new record of Mnesithea granularis OTES N (L.) Koning & Sosef (Poaceae), collected for the first time from Malwa region (Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan) India is presented. A detail description, up to date nomenclature, phenology, ecological notes and illustrations of this species have been presented. Between 2008 and 2012 botanical surveys were polystachya Hackelochloa granularis collections were acquired from the Malwa region, India. P. Beauv., Fl. Owar & Benin.Mnisuris 1: 24,porifera t. 14. 1805.Hack. undertaken in southern Rajasthan, where significant plant (L.) O. Ktze. Rev. Hook, Gen. f. op. Pl. cit 2: 776. Hackelochloa1891; Bor, Grass porifera Ind. 159. 1960. Geographically, the Malwa region is situated between in Oesterr. op.Bot. cit. Zeitschr.Rytilix 41: 48. granularis 1891; . 160. and21°10′N south-eastern to 25°09′ Rajasthan.N Latitude After and 73°45′a thorough E to survey79°13′ ofE (Hack.) Rhind, Grass. Burma 77. theLongitude literature, and critical a plateau examination in western of collectedMadhya materialPradesh 1945; Bor, 160. (L.) Skeels in U. S. Dept. Agric., Bur. Pl. Indus. 282: 20. 1913. (Figures 1 and 2). determinedand with expert as Mnesithea advice fromgranularis authorities of the Indian Annual, erect, up to 30 cm high; culms much branched Association of Angiosperm Taxonomy, several specimens from base, nodes hairy.
[Show full text]
Grasses of Namibia Contact
Checklist of grasses in Namibia Esmerialda S. Klaassen & Patricia Craven For any enquiries about the grasses of Namibia contact: National Botanical Research Institute Private Bag 13184 Windhoek Namibia Tel. (264) 61 202 2023 Fax: (264) 61 258153 E-mail: [email protected] Guidelines for using the checklist Cymbopogon excavatus (Hochst.) Stapf ex Burtt Davy N 9900720 Synonyms: Andropogon excavatus Hochst. 47 Common names: Breëblaarterpentyngras A; Broad-leaved turpentine grass E; Breitblättriges Pfeffergras G; dukwa, heng’ge, kamakama (-si) J Life form: perennial Abundance: uncommon to locally common Habitat: various Distribution: southern Africa Notes: said to smell of turpentine hence common name E2 Uses: used as a thatching grass E3 Cited specimen: Giess 3152 Reference: 37; 47 Botanical Name: The grasses are arranged in alphabetical or- Rukwangali R der according to the currently accepted botanical names. This Shishambyu Sh publication updates the list in Craven (1999). Silozi L Thimbukushu T Status: The following icons indicate the present known status of the grass in Namibia: Life form: This indicates if the plant is generally an annual or G Endemic—occurs only within the political boundaries of perennial and in certain cases whether the plant occurs in water Namibia. as a hydrophyte. = Near endemic—occurs in Namibia and immediate sur- rounding areas in neighbouring countries. Abundance: The frequency of occurrence according to her- N Endemic to southern Africa—occurs more widely within barium holdings of specimens at WIND and PRE is indicated political boundaries of southern Africa. here. 7 Naturalised—not indigenous, but growing naturally. < Cultivated. Habitat: The general environment in which the grasses are % Escapee—a grass that is not indigenous to Namibia and found, is indicated here according to Namibian records.
[Show full text]
Gramineae- Andropogoneae-Rottboelliinae
BLUMEA 45 (2000) 443-475 Revision of Hemarthria (Gramineae- Andropogoneae-Rottboelliinae) E. van den Heuvel & J.F. Veldkamp Summary A taxonomic revision is given of Hemarthria R.Br. (Gramineae-Andropogoneae-Rottboelliinae) occurring in the warm to tropical areas of the Old World (mainly in SE Asia), with oneintroduced in the New. Fourteen and from Vietnam taxa are recognised, including a variety a new species pro- posed here. A neotype for the lectotype species had to be designated. Key words: Hemarthria, Gramineae, Rottboelliinae. Introduction Hemarthria R.Br, is a small Old World, mainly SE Asian genus of 14 taxa of scant economic interest which may account for the fact that no recent revision exists. The started of the Thai and Malesian taxa but later present study out as a survey was ex- tendedto the whole This accounts for the Thai and Malesian cover genus. emphasis on material and distributions. Many species ofHemarthria were describedfirst in RottboelliaL.f., long a dustbin for species with inflorescences composed ofone or more terete spikes ofa 'rat-taiT- with sessile, less like appearance appressed spikelets, more or easily disarticulating lack injoints with a spikelet attached, but sometimes remaining intact. The spikelets a true awn, but the glumes may be drawn out into a (bi-)caudate apex. Gradually it was realised that this assemblage was extremely heterogeneous and unnaturaland it include of became dismembered.However, some authors persisted to the core Hemar- Rottboellia, Hackel in his monumental of the thriain e.g. (1889) treatment Andropogo- want neae and Hooker f. (1896). For ofany better sources these authors were followed by many for a long time; Schmid(1958) and Roberty (1960) apparently were the last agrostologists still to maintainRottboelliain a wide concept that includedHemarthria.
[Show full text]
DAY-LENGTH CONTROL of INFLORESCENCE INITIATION in the GRASS ROTTBOELLIA EXALTATA L.F
DAY-LENGTH CONTROL OF INFLORESCENCE INITIATION IN THE GRASS ROTTBOELLIA EXALTATA L.f. By L. T. EVANS* l .'11 anu8cript received November 17, 1961 J Summary R. exaltata is a strict short·day plant with a critical photoperiod of about 13 hr. The number of short days required for inflorescence initiation varies with age, being 6 with plants 5 weeks old. Exposure to additional short days increases the rate of inflorescence development. The expanding leaf is the one most sensitive to short.day induction and removal of the leaves below it accelerates inflorescence development. Short.day exposures given to different leaves can, in some cases, be as effective for induction as when the short days are all given to the same leaves. Long days interpolated between the first two short days of an inductive sequence, or given to the lower leaves early in the inductive sequence while the uppermost leaf blade is exposed to short days, accelerate inflorescence development, while those interpolated or given simultaneously later in the sequence are inhibitory. It is concluded that short· day leaves produce a stimulus to inflorescence initiation which is translocated from them rapidly after each long night, while long·day leaves produce a transmissible substance which may either accelerate or inhibit inflorescence development depending on the progress toward induction. I. INTRODUCTION Much recent work on flowering in short-day plants has been concerned with the sequence of partial processes leading to the production, in leaves exposed to short days, of a stable transmissible stimulus to inflorescence initiation. Apart from effects they might have on the movement of this stimulus to the shoot apex, leaves in long days have usually been accorded a neutral role, although several authors (e.g.
[Show full text]
Plant Diseases Regulations 1989
Western Australia Plant Diseases Regulations 1989 STATUS OF THIS DOCUMENT This document is from an electronic database of legislation maintained by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office of Western Australia. DISCLAIMER No warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this document. The State of Western Australia and its agents and employees disclaim liability, whether in negligence or otherwise, for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the accuracy or completeness of this document. REPRINT AND CONSOLIDATION NUMBERING The reprint number (in the footer of each page of the document) shows how many times the Act has been reprinted. For example, numbering a reprint as “Reprint 3” would mean that the reprint was the 3rd reprint since the Act was passed. A consolidation described as “Consolidation 3a” would be the result of updating Reprint 3 for the first time to reflect the amendments since the date as at which Reprint 3 was prepared. Reprint and consolidation numbering was implemented as from 1 January 2003. COPYRIGHT Copyright in this document is reserved to the Crown in right of the State of Western Australia. Reproduction except in accordance with copyright law is prohibited. THE TEXT OF THE LEGISLATION FOLLOWS Western Australia Plant Diseases Regulations 1989 CONTENTS Part 1 — Preliminary 1. Citation 1 2. Commencement 1 3. Interpretation 1 Part 2 — Entry requirements 3A. Quality assurance system 3 3B. Bringing plants into the State 3 4. Potential carriers — conditions for entry 3 4A. Potential carriers — entry for experimental purposes 4 4B. Potential carriers — entry for processing or export 4 5. Entry of propagating material 5 6.
[Show full text]