Accepted Manuscript

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accepted Manuscript Accepted Manuscript This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication in the journal Ratarstvo i povrtarstvo. This early version of the accepted manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the editing production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content. Manuscript submitted: 15 July 2020 Manuscript accepted: 19 August 2020 doi: 10.5937/ratpov57-27516 To appear in: Ratar. Povrt. (2020) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- original scientific paper Diversity of phytopathogenic fungi on soybean seed in Serbia Slobodan Krsmanović* · Kristina Petrović · Marina Ćeran · Vuk Đorđević · Predrag Ranđelović · Simona Jaćimović · Zlatica Miladinov Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, 30 Maksima Gorkog, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia Corresponding author: [email protected] Current title: Krsmanović S. et al. Diversity of phytopathogenic fungi on soybean seed in Serbia Acknowledgments: The research was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, grant number: 451-03-68/2020-14/200032. Summary: Soybean is one of the most important industrial crops in the world. The rich nutritional content of the seed is the reason for the increased cultivation of this crop all over the world. However, a large number of phytopathogenic fungi that exist in soybean seed can reduce the nutritional content, germination, and seed vigor. Health status analysis of soybean seed has shown that Peronospora manshurica, Macrophomina phaseolina, Botrytis cinerea, Cercospora kikuchii as well as the species from genera Alternaria, Diaporthe, and Fusarium colonized soybean seed in Serbia over three years (2016-2018). Species from the genus Alternaria and Peronospora manshurica were dominant in all three examined years. Furthermore, it has been noticed that weather conditions, location, and cultivar significantly influenced the intensity of the infection. The results of this study have shown which pathogens pose a threat to successful soybean seed production and help in finding preventive measures to control these pathogens during vegetation. Keywords: soybean, seed, phytopathogenic fungi, incidence of infection Introduction Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is the most commonly cultivated protein-oil crop in the world, and in Serbia as well, primarily because of the seed which is one of the major food and feed sources (Vlahović et al., 2013). Thus, the production of high-quality soybean seed is very important, which can be improved by right agronomic measures such as sowing a certified, disease-free seed. To keep the high health status of the seed, it is necessary to apply crop rotation which helps to break the disease cycle in the field and thus increase yield. Crop rotation of soybean and crops that share common diseases such as sunflower, as well as cultivation in monoculture, result in increasing inoculum source and the seed infection frequency by pathogens (Vidić et al. 2006). More than 200 phytopathogenic microorganisms (primarily fungi) have been detected on soybean (Hartman et al. 2015), and it is considered that about 30 species can cause significant economic damage (Roy et al. 2000). Most of them colonize soybean seed and thus spread and distribute in other soybean-growing regions worldwide (Backman et al., 1985; Pioli et al., 1999; Vidić et al., 2006). The most common fungi of soybean seed worldwide are species from following genera: Diaporthe, Fusarium, and Alternaria as well as species: Cercospora kikuchii, Rhizoctonia solani Kühn, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Botrytis cinerea Persoon, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Peronospora manshurica (Wrather et al., 2010; Tenuta et al. 2015). Phytopathogenic fungi, such as species of genus Diaporthe, negatively affect germination and seed quality (Petrović et al. 2015; 2016; 2018). Seed infections can be with no visible symptoms (latent infection) or with typical symptoms such as rot, mycelia, or discoloration. In the U.S. during the period from 2006 to 2009, seedling diseases were on the second place of importance as a causative factor in reducing the soybean yield (Koenning & Wrather, 2010). In top eight soybean-producing countries during 2006, soybean yield was mostly affected by Septoria glycines Hemmi, Cercospora kikuchii (Matsumoto & Tomoyasu) Gardner, Peronospora manshurica (Naumov) Sydow, Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goidànich, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Libert) de Bary, Phakopsora pachyrhizi Sydow & Sydow and with phytopathogenic fungi from the genus Diaporthe and Fusarium species complex (Wrather et al., 2010). In Serbia, the most prevalent pathogen in soybean seed in the past was P. manshurica, followed by species from following genera: Alternaria, Fusarium and Diaporthe (Medić-Pap et al., 2007; Petrović & Vidić, 2010; Lević et al., 2012). High humidity at the time of maturation and soybean harvest can additionally increase the harmfulness or seed infection degree with phytopathogenic fungi. Soybean yield losses caused by diseases varied due to weather and climatic conditions in most countries. The dry areas are favorable for diseases such as charcoal rot caused by M. phaseolina (Wrather & Koenning, 2006). Wet weather is suitable for developing Sclerotinia stem rot in the U.S. and Canada, Rhizoctonia blight in India, and anthracnose in the central and northern portions of Brazil and Paraguay (Wrather et al., 2010). Besides, wet weather at harvest time enhanced Diaporthe seed decay in Canada (Xue et al., 2007). Since soybean production in Serbia and soybean seed trade in Europe has rapidly increased in the last several years, the spread of the diseases by seed can be expected. The aim of this study is to make a profile of the phytopathogenic fungi that colonizes soybean seed in the main regions of soybean production in Serbia. Materials and Methods Isolation and identification of seed phytopathogenic fungi Soybean seed samples were collected from experimental fields in seven locations in Vojvodina Province, Serbia in the period 2016-2018. Three cultivars from different maturity groups (MG) were examined: ‘Galina’ (MG=0), ‘Sava’ (MG=I), and ‘Rubin’ (MG=II). First, samples of 100 seeds per cultivar were previously studied for the presence of an obligate host-specific pathogen P. manshurica using binocular loupe. Afterward, seeds were surface-disinfested in 4% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, washed two times in sterile water, and dried on a filter paper. All 100 seeds were placed in 20 Petri dishes with standard potato dextrose agar medium (PDA), five seeds in each, and incubated at 22 ± 2°C for seven days, under 12 h of alternating light/dark conditions. Fungi colonies were developed from infected seed and transferred on fresh PDA medium and incubated in a thermostat at 23 ± 2°C. The fungal pathogens of the soybean seed were profiled using morphological and cultural features. The first assessment was performed on the fourth day after isolation by observation of macro- and microscopic morphological features of mycelium and sporulation structures that were formed. Some of the colonies were left more days for incubation until identified. Pathogen identification performed using naked-eye detection of cultural and macro morphological characteristics of phytopathogenic fungi, such as colony appearance, the color of mycelium, and asexual and sexual structures, if the fungi have formed them. Afterwards, the morphological features such as the type of conidia, their length and shape were studied in detail under a light microscope at different magnifications (x10, x20, and x40). As a basis for comparing the results of the identification, it was used the Compendium of Soybean Diseases and Pests, Fifth edition (Hartman et al., 2015), where all the listed morphological features of genera and their species are precisely described that were found in this study. The incidence of fungal pathogens per sample of soybean seeds is presented in percentage, and the results were calculated with the following formula: 100 푁푢푚푏푒푟 표푓푡ℎ푒 푛푓푒푐푡푒푑 푠푒푒푑푠 푏푦 푓푢푛푔푎푙 푠푝푒푐푒푠 표푟 푔푒푛푢푠 푥 푇표푡푎푙 푛푢푚푏푒푟 표푓 푠푒푒푑푠 푛 푎 푠푎푚푝푙푒 Results and discussion Data obtained from three consecutive years have shown differences in the incidence of phytopathogenic fungi on the soybean seeds compared to a year, location, and cultivars (Fig. 1, 2, and 3). Figure 1. The incidence of fungal pathogens on the soybean seed of cv. ‘Galina’ (%) Figure 2. The incidence of fungal pathogens on the soybean seed of cv. ‘Sava’ (%) Figure 3. The incidence of fungal pathogens on the soybean seed of cv. ‘Rubin’ (%) The lowest fungal incidence of seed was noticed in 2017. The reason might be the absence of precipitation at the time of pod and seed development as well as plant maturity stage, which does not favor the development of the phytopathogenic population on seed (Petrović & Vidić, 2010). During 2017, the highest amount of precipitation was observed in Šabac location (Fig 4) where also, the highest seed infection was recorded on cvs. ‘Sava’ (26%) and ‘Galina’ (9%) followed by 1% of seed infection of cvs. ‘Galina’ and ‘Rubin’ in location Karavukovo. Figure 4. The sum of precipitation in the period of soybean maturation, July-September (2016- 2018) In 2016 and 2018, climatic conditions were favorable for pathogens development, and the presence of phytopathogenic fungi on soybean seeds was confirmed
Recommended publications
  • Strategija Društveno-Ekonomskog Razvoja Opštine Bač 2009-2014
    OPŠTINA BAČ Strategija društveno-ekonomskog razvoja opštine Bač 2009-2014. Opština Bač,decembar 2009. godine Strategija društveno-ekonomskog razvoja opštine Bač Izradu Strategije društveno-ekonomskog razvoja opštine Bač 2009-2014. finansiralo je IV Autonomne Pokrajine Vojvodine, Pokrajinski sekretarijat za lokalnu samoupravu i medjuopštinsku saradnju Konsultantsku, istraživačku i tehničku podršku u realizaciji aktivnosti na izradi Strategije društveno-ekonomskog razvoja opštine Bač 2009-2014. pružila je Regionalna agencija za razvoj malih i srednjih preduzeća Alma Mons doo Novi Sad i Institut za ekonomiku poljoprivrede iz Beograda 2 Strategija društveno-ekonomskog razvoja opštine Bač SADRŽAJ 1. Uvod 7 2. Izrada Strategije društveno-ekonomskog razvoja opštine Bač ......................................................... 11 3. Opšti podaci o Opštini ................................................................................ 19 3.1. Administrativni i geografski položaj ........................................................................ 19 3.2. Kratak istorijat Opštine ........................................................................ 21 3.3. Struktura administracije Opštine ........................................................................ 27 3.4. Klima i prirodni resursi ........................................................................ 29 3.4.1. Reljef ...................................................................................................................... 29 3.4.2. Klimatski uslovi ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2Nd Periodical Report
    Strasbourg, 23 September 2010 MIN-LANG/PR (2010) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Second periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter SERBIA The Republic of Serbia The European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages The Second Periodical Report Submitted to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe Pursuant to Article 15 of the Charter Belgrade, September 2010 2 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………6 2. Part I …………………………………………………………………………………12 2.1. Legislative and institutional changes after the first cycle of monitoring of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………….12 2.1.1. Legislative changes ……………………………………………………….12 2.1.2. The National Strategy for the Improvement of the Status of Roma ……..17 2.1.3. Judicial Reform …………………………………………………………...17 2.1.4. Establishment of the Ministry of Human and Minority Rights …………..23 2.2. Novelties expected during the next monitoring cycle of the implementation of the Charter …………………………………………………………………………….24 2.2.1. The Census ………………………………………………………………..24 2.2.2. Election of the national councils of the national minorities ……………...26 2.3. Implementation of the recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (RecChL(2009)2) 28) …………………………………………29 2.4. Activities for the implementation of the box-recommendation of the Committee of Experts with regard to the implementation of the Charter ………………………...33 3. PART II Implementation of Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………..38 3.1. Information on the policy, legislation and practice in the implementation of Part II - Article 7 of the Charter ……………………………………………………………..38 3.1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Prinos I Kvalitet Sorti Soje U Različitim Agroekološkim Uslovima
    Zbornik naučnih radova, Vol. 14 br. 1-2 (2008) UDK: 633.34:631.111+631.559 Originalni naučni rad PRINOS I KVALITET SORTI SOJE U RAZLIČITIM AGROEKOLOŠKIM USLOVIMA N. Nenadić, M. Nedić, Lj. Živanović, Lj. Kolarić, J. Zeković Izvod: U višegodišnjem periodu analizirani su rezultati prinosa i kvaliteta zrna sorti soje u različitim agroekološkim uslovima. U ogledima su bile zastupljene sorte soje pre- duzeća “Selsem” Beograd, različite dužine vegetacionog perioda, i to: Dukat (0 grupa zrenja), Galeb (I grupa) i Gorštak (II grupa zrenja). Sortni makroogledi su izvedeni na različitim tipovima zemljišta i različitim lokacijama. U zavisnosti od godine i lokacije, prinos zrna ranostasne sorte (0 grupa zrenja) varirao je od 1,39 do 5,47 t/ha, sorte I grupe zrenja od 1,38 do 5,48 t/ha i pozne sorte (II grupa zrenja) od 1,38 do 5,55 t/ha. U proseku za lokacije i godine, najveći prinos zrna soje (3,86 t/ha) postignut je sa sortom Gorštak, zatim sa sortom Galeb (3,72 t/ha) i najmanji (3,53 t/ha) sa sortom Dukat. Udeo sirovih proteina, u apsolutno suvom zrnu soje, varirao je od 42,16% u sorte Gorštak do 44,03% u sorte Dukat, a sadržaj ulja od 20,35% kod sorte Galeb do 20,53% kod sorte Gorštak. Prema dobijenim rezultatima, sadržaj proteina bio je u negativnoj korelaciji sa visi- nom prinosa sorti, što nije bio slučaj sa sadržajem ulja. Ključne reči: lokacija, prinos zrna, sadržaj proteina i ulja, soja, sorta. Uvod U svetskim razmerama, soja predstavlja najvažniju biljnu vrstu za proizvodnju ulja.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Akcija Davanja Krvi Zavoda Za Transfuziju Krvi Vojvodine U 2013.Godini 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 1
    Decembar Novembar Oktobar Septembar Avgust Jul Jun Maj April Mart Februar Januar Praznik Ljukovo B.P.Selo Čelarevo 1. B.P.Selo Sud Srbobran Gajdobra rada Jarkovci GSP+Geront. Sibaš Turija Turija Praznik 2. Bečej Sr.Karlovci Nadalj Nadalj rada Poreska 3. Institut Institut Bečej Rad.detin. Veliki petak Bečej Bečej M.M.Ajnšt. Bačka Institut 4. Inđija Sr.Karlovci B. Palanka Sr.Karlovci Srbobran R.Det.(Č) Sr. Karlovci Palanka SUP Ljukovo Bačka 5. Srbobran Žabalj B.P.Selo Uskrs Gajdobra Institut Žabalj Jarkovci Palanka Veliki Bačka 6. B. Gradište B.Palanka B. Gradište Žabalj Sud Bačka Palnka ponedeljak Palanka Bačka Bačko Medicinska 7. Temerin Gložan Žabalj Temerin Bozić Palanka Gradište M.M.Ajnšt. PLAN AKCIJA DAVANJA KRVI ZAVODA ZA TRANSFUZIJU KRVI VOJVODINE U 201 U VOJVODINE KRVI TRANSFUZIJU ZA ZAVODA KRVI DAVANJA AKCIJA PLAN Bajša Bačka Bajša 8. SUP Temerin Gložan Gložan Bačko Gradiš Gajdobra Gunaroš Palanka Gunaroš Bajša 9. Inđija Inst+Bukovac Inđija Dan pobede Gunaroš Kulpin Kulpin Bajša 10. Temerin RTV Inđija Temerin Maglić Maglić Gunaroš Kulpin Temerin 11. Dan primirja N+S Slanka. Bečej Temerin Inđija Inđija Gložan Maglić Medicinska Klub 100 Silbaš Kulpin 12. Beočin Inđija Bečej Institut+Buko Beočin Čelaevo Maglić SRS 13. SRS Bečej Silbaš Beočin Inđija Bečej (skola) Bečej Kisač N+S Slanka. Čelaevo Budisava 14. Naftagas Inđija Bečej Beočin Inđija SRS Sibaš N+S Slankam SRS 15. Budisava Selenča Inđija Bečej Inđija Sretenje Novi Karlovci Poljop.skola Bačka Čelarevo Bačka 16. Kisač N. Karlovci Temerin Selenča Palanka Budisava Palanka Đurđevo Bačka Budisava Bačka Novi 17. Izvršno veće Kisač Šajkaš Palanka Novi Karlovci Palanka Kneževac Elektro- Beška Vojvođanska Maradik Đurđevo Beška S.Krstur 18.
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Planning Report for Twin Cities
    Municipal Report Twin Cities - BAČKA PALANKA (Serbia) and ILOK (Croatia) Project is co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF an IPA II) www.interreg-danube.eu/danurb Municipal Report BAČKA PALANKA (Serbia) Prepared by: Prof. dr Darko Reba, full professor Prof. dr Milica Kostreš, associate professor Prof. dr Milena Krklješ, associate professor Doc. dr Mirjana Sladić, assistant professor Doc. dr Marina Carević Tomić, assistant professor Ranka Medenica, teaching assistant Aleksandra Milinković, teaching assistant Dijana Brkljač, teaching assistant Stefan Škorić, teaching assistant Isidora Kisin, teaching associate Dr Vladimir Dragičević, urban planner DANUrB | Bačka Palanka | Municipal Report 2 CONTENTS 1 HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT 1.1 Bačka Palanka (Serbia) 2 SPACE 2.1 Location and its connection to the Danube 2.2 Bačka Palanka municipality – spatial and socio-economic characteristics 2.3 Accessibility 2.4 Urban structure and land use 2.5 Development potentials 2.6 Mapping and spatial demarcation of data 2.7 Conclusions 3 CULTURAL HERITAGE 3.1 Tangible heritage 3.2 Intangible heritage 3.3 Identifying possibilities for heritage use in regional development 4 TOURISM 4.1 Tourism infrastructure and attractiveness 4.2 Possibilities for touristic network cooperation 5 STAKEHOLDERS’ ANALYSES 5.1 Recognition of stakeholders’ interests 5.2 Possibilities for involvement of stakeholders in DANUrB project 6 DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS 6.1 National/regional development plans 6.2 Regulatory plans 6.3 Possibilities for joint development plans 7 CONCLUSION DANUrB | Bačka Palanka | Municipal Report 3 1 HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT 1.1 Bačka Palanka (Serbia) Settlement of Bačka Palanka, under this name and with current occupied area, is mentioned fairly late in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Download [PDF, 164.53
    TECHNICAL REPORT FOR SERBIA LSMS 2007 Republican Statistical Office of Serbia, Department for International Development and World Bank 1.1 FIELDWORK Approximately 90% of the LSMS questionnaire was based on the 2002 and 2003 LSMS questionnaire, carrying forward core measures in order to measure trends over time. The survey incorporated two methods of interviewing - one involving the interviewer (face to face) and the other was a self-completion diary. All modules, with the exception of the consumption diary, were filled by the interviewer with the respondent. The diary was left in the household and filled in by the household member in charge of daily purchases. Fieldwork consisted of three phases. The first phase involved identification of the household and filling of certain modules, after which the household was instructed how to keep the diary of consumption. In the second phase each household kept the diary, while the interviewers were obliged to visit the household and help them in fill the diary where needed. In the third phase the interviewer visited the household again, examined the diary to see whether it had been correctly filled, and conducted the interview for the remaining modules. Distribution of modules according to phases is presented in the following table. Table 1: Organization of modules by phases of data collection 1. Demography and migration 2. Durable goods 1.phase: 3. Social programs 4. Health Household consumption 2.phase 5.1 Daily consumption 5.2 Monthly consumption 6. Education 7. Employment 3.phase 8. Agriculture 8. Water and sanitation Although the majority of questions were identical between LSMS 2002, 2003 and 2007, two new modules were added to LSMS 2007: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Annemarie Sorescu-Marinković
    CURRICULUM VITAE Personal information: Name: Annemarie Sorescu-Marinković Address: Dzona Kenedija 69/1, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Phone: +381603838040 Citizenship: Romanian, Serbian Date and place of birth: December 24, 1978, Pitești, Romania Education: 2010: defended her PhD thesis at the Faculty of Letters of the “Babeş-Bolyai” University in Cluj-Napoca, Romania (domain: philological sciences, thesis: Demonic beings among the Vlachs of Eastern Serbia) 2003: received her MA at the Philology Faculty, University of the West, Timișoara, Romania (domain: literature and mentalities) 2001: received her BA at the Philology Faculty, University of the West, Timișoara, Romania (domain: Romanian language and literature, English language and literature) Professional experience and institutional affiliation: From 2016: Senior Resеаrch Associate, Institute for Balkan Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade 2011–2016: Resеаrch Associate, Institute for Balkan Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade 2006–2009: Research Assistant, Institute for Balkan Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade 2005–2006: Teaching Assistant, Department for Romanian Language and Literature, Philology Faculty, University in Belgrade 2002–2005: Responsible Editor “CaliNews Romania”, Timișoara 2001–2003: Editor-in-Chief “DeWest – cultural journal”, Timișoara Domains of interest: sociolinguistics, anthropological linguistics, language acquisition, Romance and Balkan linguistics, migration studies, Balkan studies, Romani studies Publications: More than 50 book chapters and papers in peer reviewed journals, three monographs, one edited collection of studies, one edited journal (see attached). Invited lecturer: September 4, 2018: lecture Romanian speaking communities in Serbia: identity and linguistic landscape, the Institute for South East European Studies, Romanian Academy, Bucharest November 27, 2017: lecture “What language do we speak?”.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Geodiversity of the Western Bačka Danube Region in the Planning Documents and Opportunities for Improvement
    GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE “JOVAN CVIJIC” SASA COLLECTION OF PAPERS NO 58 YEAR 2008 911.2:504.6 (497.113) Vladimir Stojanović,∗ Dušan Mijović∗∗ EVALUATION OF GEODIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN BAČKA DANUBE REGION IN THE PLANNING DOCUMENTS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT Abstract: In the contemporary concept of nature preservation, the preservation of geodiversity slowly becomes normative, although geodiversity is still considered as a geotope in the function of biotope. Because of that it was analyzed geodiversity in the protected areas and the areas earmarked for protection in the Western Bačka Danube Region, in refer to five municipalities along the Danube (Sombor, Apatin, Odžaci, Bač and Bačka Palanka). Selected area is recognized by two protected natural assets – special nature reserve “Gornje Podunavlje” (Upper Danube Basin) and “Karađorđevo” represent unique wetland of flood plains in the Danube Region. Within the scope of its main values, it hasn’t been selected many localities that are typical for plain morphology. Within the scope of geodiversity of the region, 11 sites belong to the potentially protected areas, differing in type, genesis and morphology. A better approach to their evaluation can be achieved by a local action plan for geodiversity. Key words: geodiversity, geoheritage, land planning, conservation, Bačka Introduction A long tradition of the nature protection based on the specific geological and geomorphological phenomena (Salisbury Crags, Scotland – 1819; Siebengebirge, Germany – 1836; Yellowstone, USA - 1872) has not had a lot of influence on the contemporary trends of nature protection (Gray, 2004). This statement points out a disturbed balance within the nature protection policy where the protection of all living things is primary if compared to the protection of inanimate nature.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Dokumentum
    Községnév Helységnév Községnév Helységnév Sorszám magyarul magyarul szerbül szerbül 1.* Ada Ada Ada Ada Ada Mohol Ada Mol Ada Völgypart Ada Obornjača Ada Valkaisor Ada Sterijino Ada Törökfalu Ada Utrine 2. Alibunár Alibunár Alibunar Alibunar Alibunár Károlyfalva Alibunar Banatski Karlovac Alibunár Petre Alibunar Vladimirovac Alibunár Kevedobra Alibunar Dobrica Alibunár Illancsa Alibunar Ilandža Alibunár Újsándorfalva Alibunar Janošik Alibunár Végszentmihály Alibunar Lokve Alibunár Temesmiklós Alibunar Nikolinci Alibunár Ferdinándfalva Alibunar Novi Kozjak Alibunár Keviszőlős Alibunar Seleuš 3.* Antalfalva Antalfalva Kovačica Kovačica Antalfalva Torontálvásárhely Kovačica Debeljača Antalfalva Udvar Kovačica Idvor Antalfalva Nagylajosfalva Kovačica Padina Antalfalva Kovačica Putnikovo Antalfalva Számos Kovačica Samoš Antalfalva Újozora Kovačica Uzdin Antalfalva Cserépalja Kovačica Crepaja 4. Apatin Apatin Apatin Apatin * Apatin Bácskertes Apatin Kupusina Apatin Bácsszentiván Apatin Prigrevica * Apatin Szilágyi Apatin Svilojevo Apatin Szond Apatin Sonta 5.* Bács Bács Bač Bač Bács Bácsújlak Bač Bačko Novo Selo Bács Bogyán Bač Bođani Bács Vajszka Bač Vajska Bács Palona Bač Plavna Bács Bácsújfalu Bač Selenča 6.* Begaszentgyörgy Begaszentgyörgy Žitište Žitište Begaszentgyörgy Udvarnok Žitište Banatski Dvor Begaszentgyörgy Vida Žitište Banatsko Višnjićevo Banatsko Begaszentgyörgy Žitište Karađorđevo Begaszentgyörgy Torák Žitište Begejci Begaszentgyörgy Párdány Žitište Međa 1 Községnév Helységnév Községnév Helységnév Sorszám magyarul magyarul
    [Show full text]
  • JADRAN AD NOVA GAJDOBRA, PROLETERSKA 41 Broj:120 Izve5taj O Radu Odbora Direktora Za Poslovnu 2015. Godinu 1. RAD ODBORA DIREKTO
    JADRAN AD NOVA GAJDOBRA, PROLETERSKA 41 Dana:10.05.2016. Broj:120 Za: Redovnu godi5nju sednicu Skup5tine akcionara DruStva Izve5taj o radu Odbora direktora za poslovnu 2015. godinu Ovaj izve5taj predstavlja ne samo izvr5enje zakonske i statutarne obaveze vet i dokument o poslovanju u 2015. godini, a koji u sebi sublimira sve okolnosti od uticaja na poslovanje koje se odvijalo tokom 2015. godine. 1. RAD ODBORA DIREKTORA Odbor direktora je u2015. godini brojao 3 (tri) dlana i nije bilo promena dlanova. Predsednik Odbora direktora je Tamaru Stajkovi6 koja je dlan od septembra 2014. godine. Odbor direktora je svoj rad u toku 2015. godine obavljao u 9 (devet) sednica, na kojima su donete razne odluke koje se tidu poslovaniapteduzela- Odluke Odbora direktora koje se narodito istidu po vaZnosti za poslovanje DruStva u 2015. godini su: - Odluka o qsvajanju izveStaja Centralne komisije za redovni godi5nji popis ukupne imovine, obav eza i potraiiv ania Dru5tva, na dan 3 I .12.20 | 4. godine, - Odluka o izboru Konsultanta - privatizacionog savetnika u postupku privatizac4e, - Odluka o zakljudenju Ugovo4a sa Izw5nim direktorom, - Odluka o izboru Procenitelja ukupne imovine, obaveza i kapitala DruStva, sa stanjem na dan 31.12.2014. godine, - Odluka o odobrenju isplate dospelih, a neizmirenih novdanih potraZivanja treiih lica prema Jadran AD i odluka o konverziji ewa u dinare, - Odluka o usvajanju izvestajao proceni fer vrednosti ukupne imovine, obaveza i kapitala u skladu sa MRS i MSFI (IFRS) na dan 3I.12.2014. godine, privrednog druStva Jadran AD Nova Gajdobra, - Odluke o sazivanju Redorrne godi5nje sednice Skup5tine akcionara javnog akcionarskog DruStva Jadran AD Nova Gajdobra, - Odlika o utvrdivanju prestanka potrebe za radom detiri zaposlena u Jadran AD Nova Gajdobra, - Odluka o popisu i obrazovanju Komisije za popis sa stanjem na dan 31.12.2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanje Prolećnih Useva - Soja, Suncokret, Kukuruz
    STANJE PROLEĆNIH USEVA - SOJA, SUNCOKRET, KUKURUZ- Natalija Kurjak Direktor marketinga Victoria Logistic doo, Novi Sad Okrugli sto Žita Srbije i FAO, Novi Sad 09.08.2017. POVRŠINE – 2017. GODINA . Soja 250.000 ha . Suncokret 230.000 ha . Kukuruz 900.000 ha *Ukršteni podaci različitih izvora informacija PREGLEDANA MESTA - BAČKA . Rumenka, Kisač, Stepanovićevo, Zmajevo, Ravno Selo, Despotovo, Savino Selo, Kucura, Vrbas, Bačko Dobro Polje, Nadalj, Turija, Srbobran, Bečej, Žabalj, Novi Sad, Šajkaš, Gospođinci, Temerin, Titel, Futog, Begeč, Gložan, Bačka Palanka, Mladenovo, Obrovac, Karađorđevo, Odžaci, Ratkovo, Lalić, Kula, Bački Petrovac, Silbaš, Doroslovo, Stapar, Lugovo, Sombor, Svetozar Miletić, Titelski Breg, Šajkaš, Pivnice, Kulpin, Čurug, Bačko Gradište, Irmovo, Maglić, Parage, Bački Gračac, Kruščić, Bački Brestovac, Prigrevica, Apatin, Bački Breg, Gakovo, Bezdan, Rastina, Tovariševo, Bač, Vajska, Deronje, Lalić, Ruski Krstur, Sivac, Vilovo, Lovćenac, Mali Iđoš, Mali Beograd, Žednik, Subotica, Bajmok, Pa č i r, Moravica, Dušanovo (75) PREGLEDANA MESTA – BANAT - POŽAREVAC . Kikinda, Melenci, Bašaid, Zrenjanin, Novi Kneževac, Čoka, Mokrin, Srpski Itebej, Perlez, Novo Miloševo, Novi Bečej, Kumane, Toba, Boka, Šurjan, Krajišnik, Banatsko Karađorđevo, Iđoš, Klek, Žitište, Torak, Banatski D vo r, Čestereg, Aleksandrovo, Nova Crnja, Vojvoda Stepa, Srpska Crnja, Tomaševac, Botoš, Sečanj, Padej, Ostojićevo, Čoka, Crna Bara, Vrbica, Banatsko Aranđelovo, Aradac, Lukićevo, Mihajlovo, Elemir, Banatsko Veliko Selo, Orlovat, Uzdin, Kovačica, Id vo
    [Show full text]
  • Times Devoted to Sightseeing of Local Natural and Cultural Values
    “I care for...Bač ” Bač is the municipality in the north-west part of Serbia (south-west part of Vojvodina) on the left bank of the river Danube, 62 km far from Novi Sad; is the town after which BAČKA region got its name. The «Historical place of Bač and its surroundings» are listed to be recognized as UNESCO world heritage site. 18 - 26 July Camp Structure and Activities The provided activities are about: - “Active citizenship” actions: working activities - Other events: public conference – sightseeing of surroundings Active citizenship actions - working activities -cutting bushes around the fortress -painting of the wooden bridge at the entrance to the fortress -setting up the tables/panels with text (preparation of the text with help of Department for protection of monuments from Petrovaradin) inside the fortress -setting up the benches inside the fortress, Other events -round-table with representatives of National Serbian Commission for UNESCO which will present their activities and discussion about Agenda 21 for culture -mapping of cultural and natural values -Sightseeing of Franciscan Monastery, Serbian Orthodox Monastery of Bođani , Deronje, Bačka Palanka and Danube, Novi Sad, Fruška Gora Accomodation Participants will have private accommodation in family house (rooms with 2 or more beds with private and shared bathrooms) near the fortress in calm area. There are free parking places near the house. Large garden full of greens, terrace, kitchen are at participants' disposal. The meals will be prepared with the involvement of participants/volunteers except certain days determined for trips. Costs The camp is co-funded through fees for volunteers to cover the costs of accommodation in Bač and food, local transport, organizational costs and insurance and it is fixed at 250,00 € per participant.
    [Show full text]