Gas Distribution Network in North Macedonia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gas Distribution Network in North Macedonia Gas distribution network in North Macedonia Update of Feasibility study Final Report April 2020 Submitted by: North Macedonia Gas Distribution – FS Update “This report has been prepared exclusively for EBRD and is provided for illustration purposes only. EBRD makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the information set forth in this report. EBRD has not independently verified any of the information contained in the report and accepts no liability whatsoever for any information, misstatement or omission contained herein. The report remains the property of EBRD.” North Macedonia Gas Distribution – FS Update Contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 9 1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 11 1.1 Study Objective ......................................................................................... 11 1.2 Legal basis and relevant recommendations .............................................. 12 1.3 Technical approach in the current feasibility study and differences in comparison to the 2014-FS .................................................................................. 13 1.4 Estimated value of the PPP contract and financial analysis ....................... 16 1.5 Competitiveness of Natural Gas ................................................................ 18 2 General part ..................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Legal basis for awarding concession / PPP ............................................... 21 2.2 Defining the type of the contract and model of PPP .................................. 22 2.3 Estimated value of the PPP contract ......................................................... 23 2.4 Recommendations based on the Law on Concessions and Public Private Partnerships ........................................................................................................ 27 2.5 Determining the object of PPP and its main characteristics, including its additions and improvements ................................................................................ 28 2.6 Public services subject of concession/PPP, conditions under which the service will be provided ........................................................................................ 28 2.7 Defining the public good subject to concession ......................................... 28 2.8 Analysis of the conditions for management, maintenance and operation .. 28 2.9 Changes made to the previous analysis of the essential elements that are indicative of the nature of the contract and an explanation of the reasons for it ... 30 2.10 Project management issues ...................................................................... 36 2.11 Identification of weaknesses and their solution .......................................... 37 2.12 Political, social and other issues ................................................................ 38 2.13 Issues related to the monitoring (supervision) of the project ...................... 38 3 Technical analysis ............................................................................................ 40 3.1 Description of the existing facilities of concession/PPP owned by the awarding authority / public partner ....................................................................... 40 3.2 Need for construction of new or reconstruction of existing facilities subject to concession / PPP and their description ................................................................ 40 3.3 Technical requirements for designing and building of concession / PPP facility, needed to provide the public service / exploit the public good of general interest ................................................................................................................. 40 North Macedonia Gas Distribution – FS Update 3.4 Main technical and technological features of the concession / PPP facility based on: a) analysis of the concessionaire’s / public partner’s needs, b) identification of the public interest and c) identification of U planning documents necessary to construct the concession / PPP facility ............................................ 41 3.5 Need and type of preparatory work ........................................................... 41 3.6 Necessary infrastructure to bring the facility into functional condition ........ 42 3.6.1 Medium pressure pipelines ................................................................ 46 3.6.2 Pressure reduction stations ................................................................ 46 3.6.3 Low pressure pipelines ...................................................................... 46 3.6.4 Service lines....................................................................................... 48 3.6.5 Meters and risers ............................................................................... 48 3.6.6 Construction period ............................................................................ 49 3.7 Estimated value of investment for construction, costs for preparatory works, cost of management, maintenance and operation of concession / PPP facility .... 51 3.8 Equipment needed to perform the public service / exploit the public good of general interest .................................................................................................... 52 3.9 Standards for performing the public service / exploit the public good of general interest .................................................................................................... 52 3.10 Predictions for the level of demand of the public service vis-à-vis the investment and facilities considering the duration of the contract ......................... 53 3.10.1 Natural gas demand ........................................................................... 53 3.10.2 Penetration rate ................................................................................. 57 3.10.3 Incentives to increase demand ........................................................... 60 3.11 Benchmarking analysis ............................................................................. 61 3.11.1 Level of demand ................................................................................ 61 3.11.2 Level of investment ............................................................................ 65 4 Financial analysis ............................................................................................. 69 4.1 Analysis of revenues and costs for each year of duration of the PPP project, including methodology for establishment of price for public service that end users shall pay .............................................................................................................. 69 4.2 Feasibility analysis of the operational revenues, operational costs, capital expenditures and cash flow analysis .................................................................... 70 4.2.1 Investment Costs for the BASELINE Scenario ................................... 70 4.2.2 Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) ....................................... 72 4.2.3 Regulated Asset Base for the BASELINE scenario ............................ 73 4.2.4 Operational Expenditures for the BASELINE Scenario ....................... 75 North Macedonia Gas Distribution – FS Update 4.3 Transactional analysis based on projected cash flow and possibilities for financing the capital investment ........................................................................... 77 4.3.1 Financing Scheme for the BASELINE Scenario ................................. 77 4.3.2 Revenues ........................................................................................... 78 4.4 Analysis and conclusions for the efficiency of the concession / PPP from the concessionaire / public partner point of view based on IRR, NPV, break-even point and proposal for concession fee .......................................................................... 83 4.4.1 Baseline Scenario .............................................................................. 83 4.4.2 Sensitivity Analysis ............................................................................. 90 4.5 Elaborated proposal for the conditions for the concession / PPP based on the period needed for return of investment .......................................................... 94 4.6 Risk assessment and proposal for risk mitigation ...................................... 94 4.6.1 Categories of risks during the preparation phase ............................... 94 4.6.2 Categories of risk during the construction / development phase ......... 94 4.6.3 Categories of risk during the operation phase .................................... 95 4.6.4 Categories of risk during any phase of the project .............................. 95 4.7 Analysis of the domestic market and if needed the regional markets with emphasis on the risk of return of investment ........................................................ 96 4.8 Value for money analysis .......................................................................... 96 4.8.1 Currently used energy sources........................................................... 96 4.8.2 End-user
Recommended publications
  • Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018
    ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA APRIL 2019 ANNUAL REPORT 201 8 Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia in 2018 ENERGY AND WATER SERVICES REGULATORY COMMISSION OF THE REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA ___________________________________________________________________ The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission of the Republic of North Macedonia for 2018 has been prepared in accordance with Article 36 from the Energy Law, which establishes the obligation of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission to submit the Annual Report for its operation during the previous year to the Assembly of the Republic of North Macedonia, not later than 30th of April of the current year. The Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission for 2018 contains detailed information on the performance of the competences according to the Energy Law and the Law on Setting Prices of Water Services, as well as information on the material-financial operation. The Energy Law also determines that the Annual Report of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission needs to be submitted to the Government of the Republic of North Macedonia and the Ministry competent for the performance of the assignments within the energy area, so that they could be informed, as well as to the Energy Community Secretariat. The Report contains overview of the activities performed by the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission during 2018, with special review of: − State of the energy markets, − State of the prices and tariffs regulation, − Preparing regulatory acts, − International activities and − Financial Statement of the Energy and Water Services Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia
    XII. The Statistical Battle for the Population of Greek Macedonia by Iakovos D. Michailidis Most of the reports on Greece published by international organisations in the early 1990s spoke of the existence of 200,000 “Macedonians” in the northern part of the country. This “reasonable number”, in the words of the Greek section of the Minority Rights Group, heightened the confusion regarding the Macedonian Question and fuelled insecurity in Greece’s northern provinces.1 This in itself would be of minor importance if the authors of these reports had not insisted on citing statistics from the turn of the century to prove their points: mustering historical ethnological arguments inevitably strengthened the force of their own case and excited the interest of the historians. Tak- ing these reports as its starting-point, this present study will attempt an historical retrospective of the historiography of the early years of the century and a scientific tour d’horizon of the statistics – Greek, Slav and Western European – of that period, and thus endeavour to assess the accuracy of the arguments drawn from them. For Greece, the first three decades of the 20th century were a long period of tur- moil and change. Greek Macedonia at the end of the 1920s presented a totally different picture to that of the immediate post-Liberation period, just after the Balkan Wars. This was due on the one hand to the profound economic and social changes that followed its incorporation into Greece and on the other to the continual and extensive population shifts that marked that period. As has been noted, no fewer than 17 major population movements took place in Macedonia between 1913 and 1925.2 Of these, the most sig- nificant were the Greek-Bulgarian and the Greek-Turkish exchanges of population under the terms, respectively, of the 1919 Treaty of Neuilly and the 1923 Lausanne Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Analysis for Improved Water Supply in Municipality Of
    Feasibility Analysis for Improved Solid Waste Management in Municipality of Gevgelija FINAL REPORT JULY 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Goals and Objectives of the Feasibility Analysis ....................................................................................... 4 1.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Project Description and Rationale .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Gevgelija Municipality ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Geographic location ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Demographic profile ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 General Project Description ............................................................................................................................ 6 2.2.1 Solid Waste Management
    [Show full text]
  • The Disaster and the Red Cross Red Crescent Response to Date
    Revised Emergency Appeal The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Population Movement Revised Appeal n° MDRMK005 People to be assisted: Appeal launched 10 September 2015 First phase (until March 2016): 214,886 people1; Glide n° OT-2015-000069-MKD Second phase (until December 2016): 6,250 people2 Revision n° 2 issued 6 June 2016 193,218 Swiss francs DREF allocated Appeal ends 31 December 2016 6,095,910 Swiss francs revised Appeal budget Extended 3 months (from September 2016) 933,353 Swiss francs funding gap This Revised Emergency Appeal seeks a total of some 6,095,910 Swiss francs - a small increase from the original budget of 5,927,821 Swiss francs - to enable the IFRC to support the Red Cross of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to deliver assistance and support to some 221,136 people. The current revised appeal builds upon the previous revision, continuing the provision of basic food and non-food items, hygiene promotion, health care including First Aid, Restoring Family Links (RFL) services, and community engagement, as well as building the response capacities of the National Society through contingency stocks. With this revision, the Red Cross of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia is responding to the daily needs of the beneficiaries stranded in the two camps, as well as to the needs of irregular migrants in the Detention Centre in Skopje and to those of irregular migrants crossing the border from Serbia and Greece. The National Society is adding the provision of psychosocial support and more comprehensive community engagement strategy with both the national population and the migrants, as well as the rehabilitation of their asylum centre to support the long term shelter needs of the migrants in country.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Systems Practice (Lsp) Activity Local Works Macedonia | Civil Society Organizational Network Analysis (Ona)
    LOCAL SYSTEMS PRACTICE (LSP) ACTIVITY LOCAL WORKS MACEDONIA | CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORK ANALYSIS (ONA) JUNE 2018 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by LINC LLC and local partner, the Macedonian Center for International Cooperation (MCIC). USAID Local Systems Practice June 2018 Prepared by: Craig Hempfling, LINC; Megan McDermott, LINC; Jenna White, LINC; Patrick Sommerville, LINC; Aleksandar Krzalovski, MCIC; Emina Nuredinoska, MCIC; Aleksandra Savevska, MCIC; Boris Ristovski, MCIC; Monika Bozinoska, MCIC; and Jasmina Ristovska, MCIC Front cover: Network map of Macedonian CSOs. Acknowledgements: The author(s) would like to acknowledge all of our LSP consortium partners for their input throughout the process, the valuable assistance of MCIC support staff in ensuring a thorough and timely analysis, as well as all of the organizations who took the time to participate in the Network Analysis survey. These contributions are crucial for advancing our mutual efforts towards improved local development in Macedonia. About Local Systems Practice: Local Systems Practice is a USAID-funded activity that directly assists multiple Missions, partners, and constituents to design and adaptively manage systems-based programs in complex environments. The concept has been designed to aid Missions and partners to overcome four specific challenges to effective Local Systems Practice through: a) Listening; b) Engagement; c) Discovery; and d) Adaptation. The Theory of Change underpinning the activity asserts that the application of systems tools to complex local challenges at multiple intervals throughout the program cycle will enhance the sustainability of programming, resulting in better-informed, measurable interventions that complement and reinforce the systems they seek to strengthen.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Adult Population of District of Tetovo in the Northwest Region of the Republic of Macedonia
    Available online at www.ijmrhs.com cal R edi ese M ar of c l h a & n r H u e o a J l l t h International Journal of Medical Research & a S n ISSN No: 2319-5886 o c i t i Health Sciences, 2018, 7(3): 104-114 e a n n c r e e t s n I • • IJ M R H S Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Adult Population of District of Tetovo in the Northwest Region of the Republic of Macedonia Atila Rexhepi1*, Nevzat Elezi1 and Ylber Jani2 1 Faculty of Medicine, State University of Tetovo, Republic of Macedonia 2 Private Health Institute, Heart Diagnostica, Debar, Republic of Macedonia *Corresponding e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT Objective: To estimate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its separate components in the adult population of the district of Tetovo. Methods: Total of 630 subjects aged over 18 years were selected at random, from the primary healthcare register, to constitute a representative sample of a population in the district of Tetovo, adjusted for age and sex. MetS is defined according to the definition of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATPIII). Results: The prevalence of MetS in the district of Tetovo was 28.25%. It was significantly higher in women than in men (34.06% versus 22.26%, p=0.004). The largest number of people with MetS living in rural areas (31.32% versus 23.60%, p=0.002). Of the particular components of MetS, 52.06% of the population had increased arterial blood pressure, 46.35% reduced values of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and 43.17% abdominal adiposity (AA).
    [Show full text]
  • CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY and SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Contents
    2011 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Contents 2 TITAN Group Profile 3 USJE Profile 4 Message from the Chief Executive Director 6 2011 at a Glance 8 Our Footprint 10 CSR Strategy & Corporate Governance 14 CSR Performance 14 Health & Safety 18 Our people 22 Environment and Climate Change 27 Innovation and Development 28 Community Engagement and Development 32 CSR Leadership and Networking 34 Recognitions and Awards 35 About the Report: Assessment and Verification 36 UN Global Compact Initiative 1 TITAN Group Profile TITAN, one of the oldest industrial enterprises in Greece, produces and trades cement and building materials. Over the last 20 years it has developed into a multiregional producer of cement and other related building materials with activities in Greece, South Europe, the Eastern Mediterranean and North America. NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN U.S.A. Greece and Western Europe Southeastern Europe Algeria Eastern Mediterranean Cement plants 2 Cement plants 4 Cement plants 5 Cement plants 3 Libya Quarries 6 Quarries 29 Quarries 11 Grinding plants 2 Ready-mix plants 96 Ready-mix plants 28 Ready-mix plants 9 Quarries 15 Distribution terminals 14 Distribution terminals 4 Distribution terminals 2 Ready-mix plants 4 Concrete block plants 9 Dry mortar plant 1 Personnel 1,690 Personnel 1,009 Fly Ash Processing plants in the U.S.A. 6 Fly Ash Processing plant 1 Fly Ash Processing plant in Canada 1 Personnel 1,208 Personnel 1,733 2 USJE Profile Cementarnica USJE AD Skopje (or USJE) was founded in 1955 near the USJE village in the southeast part of the city of Skopje.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport DAH Couleur
    City of Skopje PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Reconstruction and rehabilitation of Boris Trajkovski street from Staklara factory to Pintija settlement May 2015 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE MUNICIPALITY CITY OF SKOPJE 1. Location map 2. General information Area: 1,818 km2 / 23 km length and 9 km width Latitude: 42°00’ north Longitude: 21°26’ east Elevation: 245 meters Average temperature: 13.5°C / 56°F B. DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC PROFILE 1. Demography of the City of Skopje Table 1: Inhabitants, households, apartments in Skopje Municipality Inhabitants Households Apartments Aerodrom 72,009 21,495 23,754 Butel 36,154 10,056 11,077 Gazi Baba 72,617 20,336 22,815 Gjorche Petrov 41,634 11,886 13,938 Karposh 59,666 19,680 22,849 Kisela Voda 57,236 17,577 20,237 Saraj 35,408 7,972 7,837 Centar 45,412 15,355 18,848 Chair 64,773 17,107 17,127 Shuto Orizari 22,017 5,102 5,263 City of Skopje 506,926 146,566 163,745 Source: 2002 Census, according to the administrative-territorial organization from 2004 2 Table 2: Total inhabitants in Skopje according to five years groups Municipality Total 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 Skopje 506926 30097 32788 35942 38117 40111 39973 38700 36900 35361 Aerodrom 72009 3393 3458 4198 5668 6704 6091 5131 4705 5017 Butel 36514 2239 2557 2639 2740 3029 2844 2759 2659 2563 G.Baba 72617 4582 4913 5141 5280 5742 6090 5560 5240 4989 G.Petrov 41634 2248 2484 2869 3189 3109 3213 3075 2956 3192 Karposh 59666 2837 3142 3550 3760 3657 4030 4741 4671 4228 K.Voda 57236 2843 3361 3794 3886 4008
    [Show full text]
  • Roma in the Republic of Macedonia: Challenges and Inequalities in Housing, Education and Health
    briefing Roma in the Republic of Macedonia: Challenges and Inequalities in Housing, Education and Health Andrea Spitálszky Young girl in Roma settlement, Republic of Macedonia. Andrea Spitalszky, April 2018. Acknowledgements Project: From action to equal rights for Roma. IPA/2015/382006. This project is funded by the European Union. This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE and Minority Rights Group International and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union. Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE Minority Rights Group International The Roma Democratic Development Association SONCE is a Minority Rights Group International (MRG) is a non-governmental organization working at the local, national non-governmental organization (NGO) working to secure and international levels to promote civil integration, democratic the rights of ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and rights and equal opportunities for Roma in the Republic of indigenous peoples worldwide, and to promote cooperation Macedonia. Founded in 1996 as an informal self-help group for and understanding between communities. Our activities are the Roma community in the Municipality of Tetovo and officially focused on international advocacy, training, publishing and registered in 1999 as a non-profit organization, SONCE has outreach. We are guided by the needs expressed by our implemented more than 50 projects over the past two decades worldwide partner network of organizations, which represent in a range of areas including education, health and social care, minority and indigenous peoples. employment and democratic participation of Roma.
    [Show full text]
  • Portals and Doors in Traditional Ohrid Architecture
    PORTALS AND DOORS IN TRADITIONAL OHRID ARCHITECTURE Elena Nikoljski Panevski, Vladimir Karanakov ABSTRACT The basis for this scientific work is traditional Macedonian architecture, with emphasis on old doorway of family houses and religious objects (sacral and profane architecture). Ohrid has always been interesting for examination from these aspects, because of the fact that it has lots of historical monuments. The old part of the city contains houses, museums and churches which are one of the quality examples for traditional Macedonian architecture. The main purpose of this paper is to learn more about details in architecture, and of course, the value of details, especially old doors, portals, their dimensions, characteristics, art style, their constructors etc. This is because there is a lot of information originating from literature, books, study works and other written sources about Macedonian traditional architecture, but there is not much information about their details such as doors, windows, portals, etc. These beautiful, genius objects were built in the 19 th century. Today, they attract people who love art with its special charm and beauty, and inspire specialists - architects - for its contemporary application and creation, releasing it from fake values. There are many towns in Macedonia with well-preserved architecture dating from the 19 th century: Krushevo, Kratovo, Novo Selo, Tetovo, Debar, Struga, Prilep, Kriva Palanka, Strumica. Central place among them takes Ohrid, in particular ancient Lychinidos. REFERENCES Adorno, T. (1979): The theory of aestetics, Beograd. Aleksievska Hadzieva, J. (1985): Measurements, antropomorphyc and modular proportion in old Macedonian house, Studentski zbor, Skopje, 154-160. Architectural composition of the old Macedonian house, (1986), Faculty of Architecture - Skopje, 76-83.
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum of November 7Th in Macedonia
    Back to the future: the referendum of November 7th in Macedonia Albert van Hal1 1. Introduction The referendum of November 7th, 2004 in Macedonia — that wanted to reject the law on new municipal boundaries — failed completely. The turn out was only 26%. Since the end of the war of 2001 this referendum was the most serious test for the stability of the country so far. For the moment, Macedonia has left the past behind and has its eyes back on the future. To understand the current political situation in Macedonia this article describes the ups and downs which Macedonia has experienced in its struggle for stability in recent history and especially since the war of 2001. I will give special attention to the topic of decentralisation: the proposed changes to municipal borders, the role of the different political parties in this process, the popular response to it and the outcome of the referendum. Also the international position of Macedonia and the role the EU, the USA and Iraq played during this ‘crisis’ is explained. The article ends by looking forward. 2. Ethnic composition Macedonia was part of Yugoslavia until 1991, when it became an independent republic. Macedonia is a country with just over 2 million inhabitants, representing a wide variety of different ethnic groups. Ethnic groups in the Republic of Macedonia Ethnic group % of population Macedonian 64.18 Albanian 25.17 Turkish 3.85 Roma 2.66 Serbs 1.78 Bosniacs 0.84 Vlachs 0.48 Other 1.04 Total 100 Source: National Institute for Statistics, Skopje, 2002 1 Albert van Hal is project manager Kosovo and Macedonia at the Dutch IKV (Inter-Church Peace Council).
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    E2120 EMP Checklist for Construction and Rehabilitation Activities General Guidelines for use of EMP checklist: For low-risk topologies, such as school and hospital rehabilitation activities, the ECA Public Disclosure Authorized safeguards team developed an alternative to the current EMP format to provide an opportunity for a more streamlined approach to preparing EMPs for minor rehabilitation or small-scale works in building construction, in the health, education and public services sectors. The checklist-type format has been developed to provide “example good practices” and designed to be user friendly and compatible with safeguard requirements. The EMP checklist-type format attempts to cover typical core mitigation approaches to civil works contracts with small, localized impacts. It is accepted that this format provides the key elements of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) or Environmental Management Framework (EMF) to meet World Bank Environmental Assessment requirements under OP 4.01. The intention of this checklist is that it would be applicable as guidelines for the small works contractors and constitute an Public Disclosure Authorized integral part of bidding documents for contractors carrying out small civil works under Bank-financed projects. The checklist has three sections: Part 1 includes a descriptive part that characterizes the project and specifies in terms the institutional and legislative aspects, the technical project content, the potential need for capacity building program and description of the public consultation process. This section could be up to two pages long. Attachments for additional information can be supplemented when needed. Part 2 includes an environmental and social screening checklist, where activities and potential environmental issues can be checked in a simple Yes/No format.
    [Show full text]