DOCSLIB.ORG

South Sudan Consolidated Appeal 2013 | Mid-Year Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Sudan Consolidated Appeal 2013 | Mid-Year Review SOUTH SUDAN CONSOLIDATED APPEAL 2013 | MID-YEAR REVIEW United Nations Clusters Assess and analyse needs Clusters and OCHA Humanitarian Country Monitor, review Team and Coordinator and report Set strategy and priorities HUMANITARIAN PLANNING PROCESS Organizations Clusters Mobilize resources Develop objectives, indicators, and implement response plans and projects HC/HCT and OCHA Compile strategy and plans into consolidated appeal (CAP) 2013 CONSOLIDATED APPEAL FOR SOUTH SUDAN A. ACF-USA, ACROSS, ACTED, ADESO, ADRA, AMURT International, ARC, ARDI, ASMP, AVSI, AWODA, B. BRAC, C. CAD, CAFOD, CARE International, CARITAS, CASI, CCC, CCM, CDAS, CDoT, CESVI, CHF International, CMA, CMD, COSV, CRADA, CRS, CRWRC/World Renew, CUAMM, CW, D. DAI, DCA, DDG, DORD, DRC, F. FAO, FAR, FH, FLDA, G. GOAL, H. HCO, HELP e.V., HI, I. IAS, IBIS, IMC UK, Intermon Oxfam, INTERSOS, IOM, IRC, IRW, J. JEN, Johanniter, K. KHI, L. LCEDA, LWF, M. MaCDA, MAG, MaGNA, Malaria Consortium, Mani Tese, MEDAIR, Mercy corps, Merlin, MI, Mulrany International, N. NCA, NHDF, NPP, NPA, NPC, NRC, O. Oxfam GB, P. PACODES, PAH, PCO, Plan International, R. RedR, RI, RUWASSA, S. SALF, Samaritan's Purse, SC, SCA, Sign of Hope, SMC, Solidarités, SPEDP, SSUDA, T. TEARFUND, THESO, U. UNDSS, UNESCO, UNFPA, UNHABITAT, UNHAS, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIDO, UNKEA, UNMAS, UNOCHA, UNOPS, UNWWA, UNYMPDA, V. VSF- Belgium, VSF-Germany, VSF-Suisse, W. WFP, WHO, World Relief, WV South Sudan. Please note that appeals are revised regularly. The latest version of this document is available on http://unocha.org/cap and www.southsudancap.info. Full project details, continually updated, can be viewed, downloaded and printed from http://fts.unocha.org. Cover photo: A refugee from Blue Nile State treats her malnourished child with therapeutic milk at a feeding centre in Upper Nile (UNICEF/Brian Sokol) For additional information , please contact [email protected] Produced by OCHA South Sudan 17 June 2013 SOUTH SUDAN CONSOLIDATED APPEAL 2013 | MID-YEAR REVIEW OCHA INTRODUCTION SOUTH Sudan CAP MID-YEAR REVIEW 2013 States,REFE state capitalsR andEN major settlementsCE MAP in South Sudan Sawdiri Shuwak Kutum Wad Madani Mellit GEDAREF Ad Al Gadarif Al Fashir Duwaym Barah Sennar NORTH Al Hawatah Es Suki NORTH KORDOFAN El Obeid Umm DARFUR Kosti Sinjah SUDAN Ruwabah Ar Rahad Tandalti An Nahud Abu WHITE SENNAR Zabad NILE Nyala Gerger Dilling Ar Rusayris Ad Daein SOUTH Renk SOUTH KORDOFAN DARFUR Kadugli BLUE NILE Al Muglad EAST DARFUR Talawdi Melut Athidway Oriny Mendi ABYEI Riangnhom Kodok Radom UPPER NILE Tonga Bentiu Malakal Begi War-Awar Mayom Dajo Marial-Baai Turalei Juaibor Atar Abwong Gimbi Akuem Mankien Akun UNITY Old Fangak NORTHERN Koch Nasir Maiwut BAHR Gogrial Dembi Dolo Aweil WARRAP Jikou Raja EL GHAZAL Leer Boro Medina Waat Kwajok Adok Gore Warrap Kangi Ayod Walgak Marial-Lou Wanding Deim Zubeir Nyal Akobo Wau Duk Fadiat ETHIOPIA Thiet Ganylel WESTERN Kuajiena LAKES BAHR EL GHAZAL JONGLEI Tonj Likuangole Cueibet Kongor CENTRAL Shambe Pochalla Pibor AFRICAN Yirol Rumbek Padak/Baidit Churi REPUBLIC Akot Awerial Bor Djéma Boma Mvolo Tali Tambura Muni Amadi Obo WESTERN Terekeka M'Boki Source Yubo Lui EASTERN EQUATORIA Bambouti EQUATORIA Mundri Mangalla Zémio Ezo Naandi Lafon Maridi Li Rangu Juba Kapoeta Nzara Liria Narus Yambio CENTRAL EQUATORIA Torit Chukudum Lokitaung Pajok Yei Lokichoggio Magwi Ikotos Kajo-Keji Niangara Faradje Pageri Kakuma Azile Dungu Nimule Titule KENYA Kitgum Arua Watsa Lodwar Buta Isirio Gulu Mungbere UGANDA Lokichar DEMOCRATIC Andudu Lira REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO Wamba Masindi Soroti Bunia Hoima Kolowa Mbale Bafwasende Kitale ^! Country Capital Undetermined boundary* 0 100 200 km State Capitals Abeyi region** The information shown on this map does not imply official recognition or endorsement of and physical, Populated place International boundaries political boundaries or feature names by the United Nations or other collaborative organizations. UN OCHA and affiliated organizations are not liable for damages of any kind related to the use of this Rivers State boundaries data. Users noting errors or omissions are encouraged to contact [email protected]. ** Final boundary between the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan not yet determined. Lakes ** Final status of Abyei area not yet determined. SOUTH SUDAN CAP 2013 | MID-YEAR REVIEW INTRODUCTION 1 CONTENTS Preface . 2 Foreword . 3 Executive summary . 5 Humanitarian dashboard. 6 2013 COMMON Humanitarian ACTION PLAN 8 Changes in context and needs . 12 Planning scenario . 12 Strategy at mid-year . 13 Progress at mid-year . 15 Cluster RESPONSE PLANS 19 Coordination and common services . 19 Education . 21 Emergency telecommunications . 25 Food security and livelihoods . 27 Health . 31 Logistics . 35 Mine action. 38 Multi-sector (refugees and returnees) . 42 Nutrition . 46 Protection . 50 Shelter and non-food items . 54 Water, sanitation and hygiene . 57 ANNEX 60 Monitoring and reporting. 61 2012 in review . 63 Requirements and funding 2013. 65 Assessment reference list . 84 Endnotes . 89 Acronyms . 90 2 INTRODUCTION SOUTH SUDAN CAP 2013 | MID-YEAR REVIEW PREFacE From the Government of South Sudan The Consolidated Appeal for 2013 is a product of the joint work of the Government and the humanitarian community to address some of South Sudan's most pressing humanitarian challenges. The mid-year review of the appeal is an opportunity to review progress against our goals, and commitments made to people in need. This year’s mid-year review has been the most inclusive and accountable to date with Government, donors, UN and NGOs evaluating plans and strategies together to ensure that they best address needs on the ground. The resumption of oil production in April provides a significant opportunity to improve the lives of all our citizens but particularly the lives of the most vulnerable. There are however ongoing political issues on oil flow with Sudan. South Sudanese are a resilient people and we need to enable our citizens to lift themselves out of poverty and fully contribute to the building of our nation. As we have welcomed the 1.9 million South Sudanese from Sudan who have returned since 2007, we will embrace those who continue to arrive this year and beyond. We must ensure that people return in a safe, voluntary and dignified way. We will work to prioritize that those arriving are helped in building new lives wherever they settle. As the conflict in Sudan’s Blue Nile and South Kordofan nears its third year, our Sudanese neighbours continue to seek refuge in Unity and Upper Nile. South Sudan will offer them a safe haven until peace allows them to return home. We will continue to work with the Humanitarian Coordinator and all our humanitarian partners to create an environment in which aid agencies can access people in need. There is much to be done to improve the lives of our people in 2013 and we look to our partners to continue to support us in this endeavor. I am pleased to see the increased engagement of national counterparts by international NGOs and UN agencies in all aspects of their work. It is us South Sudanese who will move our country forward in the longer term as and when the need for humanitarian assistance reduces. The Government recognizes the tireless efforts of the humanitarian community in South Sudan to help our people. To South Sudanese relief workers who risk their lives in volatile areas and to international aid workers who leave their families to come to work in some of the most remote corners of our country, I tell you that the Government of South Sudan is grateful for your commitment and continues to stand beside you. To the donor community, I thank you for your continued support in addressing the needs of the people of South Sudan, and I assure you that we will continue to work to develop sustainable and innovative programmes to increase the resilience and capacity of all our people. His Excellency, Joseph Lual Achuil Lual Minister of Humanitarian Affairs and Disaster Management SOUTH SUDAN CAP 2013 | MID-YEAR REVIEW INTRODUCTION 3 FOREWORD Pledging commitment to the people of South Sudan As South Sudan approaches the second anniversary of its independence, the problems facing the world's youngest country often appear insurmountable. But how are things now compared to one or two years ago? To what extent has the engagement of the interna- tional community, for example its generous funding for the largest humanitarian operation in Africa, helped? This review brings to light a different and largely better picture of the situation than might have been expected. While the scale and depth of need is still immense and requires sustained engagement, most issues that have an impact on the humanitarian situation are moving in the right direction. While the situation is fragile, hostilities are killing and displacing fewer people, food insecurity has stabilized at least for the time-being, and the economy is weathering the shocks associated with the oil shutdown and resumption. Security has improved with fewer people uprooted from their homes due to violence so far this year compared to the same period in 2012 when some 193,000 people were displaced. We anticipate that aid agencies will assist up to 125,000 people displaced by fighting throughout 2013. Most of the displaced are in parts of Jonglei where the escalation in hostilities has been as persistent as the difficulties aid agencies have experienced working there. Our forecast for the number of refugees in South Sudan has decreased from 350,000 to 263,000. As the pace of new arrivals fleeing conflict in Sudan's Blue Nile and South Kordofan states slowed, the refugee operation has evolved to include both crisis response and care and maintenance. Aid organizations stabilized malnutrition and contained disease outbreaks and new camps are opening to take pressure off existing settlements.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of South Sudan EARLY WARNING and DISEASE
    Early Warning and Disease Surveillance System Republic of South Sudan EARLY WARNING AND DISEASE SURVEILLANCE BULLETIN (IDP CAMPS AND COMMUNITIES) Week 48 24 – 30 November 2014 General Overview Completeness for weekly reporting decreased from 98% to 92% while timeliness decreased from 72% to 50% in week 48 when compared to week 47. Malaria remains the top cause of morbidity in week 48 with Malakal PoC having the highest incidence followed by Tongping, Bentiu, Bor and Lankien. During week 48, Malakal PoC had the highest incidence for malaria and ABD, while Bentiu PoC had the highest incidence for ARI and AWD. A total of three suspect measles cases were reported from Melut (1 case) and Lankien (2 cases) during week 48. There are no new HEV cases reported since week 47. The cumulative for HEV in Mingkaman remains at 124 cases including four deaths (CFR 3.23%). There are no new cholera cases reported since week 47. The cumulative remains at 6,421 cholera cases including 167 deaths (CFR 2.60%) from 16 counties in South Sudan. The under-five and crude mortality rates in all IDP sites were below the emergency threshold in week 48. Seven suspect meningitis deaths have been reported from Chotbora PHCC in Longechuk County. The preliminary verification report indicates no new suspect cases since 18 November 2014. Completeness and Timeliness of Reporting Completeness for weekly reporting decreased from 48 (98%) in week 47, to 46 (92%) in week 48. Timeliness for weekly reporting decreased from 35 (72%) in week 47 to 25 (50%) in week 48.
    [Show full text]
  • Marking Nuer Histories
    Marking Nuer Histories Gender, Gerontocracy, and the Politics of Inclusion in the Upper Nile from 1400 – 1931 By Noel Stringham Department of History University of Virgnia 1 February 2016 0 Table of Contents Table of Contents Page 1 Dating System Table of Historical Age-Sets/Marriage-Sets Page 2 List of Maps Page 4 Orthographies, Spellings, and Translations Page 5 Acknowledgements Page 8 Introduction Marking the Past: Page 10 Indigenous Epistemologies of History, “the Nuer”, and Africanist Historians Chapter 1 History as Exogamous Kinship: Page 33 Agro-Pastoralist Mobility, Pulling Teeth, and Ethnogenesis After 1400 Chapter 2 Marking Marriageability: Page 76 Reconstructing a Gendered History of the Era of “Turning-Hearts (1790s – 1828) Chapter 3 Marking Costly Assimilations Page 110 Loosing Battles, Recruiting Bachelors, and Erosion of Moral Community (1828 – 1860s) Chapter 4 Marking the Prophet’s Rod: Page 154 From Chaos to Syncretistic Community (1870s – 1896) Chapter 5 Marking Militarization: Page 196 From the Prophet’s Rod to Firearms on the Abyssinian Frontier (1896 – 1920s) Conclusion History as Additive: Page 245 Achieving and Archiving Change through Combination and Accumulation Bibliography Page 253 1 Table of Historic Age-Sets / Marriageability-Sets Cohorts of the Eastern Jikäny and other nei ti naath until 2003 Ric (thok naath) Age-Set / Marriage-Set Name (English) Initiation Date - Early Sets (Bul and Jikäny) 1 – Riɛk 2 Alter Pole Unknown Jɔk 3 Earth-Spirit / Disease Unknown - Sets with Gaar (Jikäny, Lak, Thiaŋ, Jagɛi, Lɔu,
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of South Sudan 2015 Table A
    Republic of South Sudan 2015 Table A: Total funding and outstanding pledges* as of 24 September 2021 http://fts.unocha.org (Table ref: R10) Compiled by OCHA on the basis of information provided by donors and appealing organizations. Donor Channel Description Funding Outstanding Pledges USD USD African Development Bank WFP To be allocated to a specific sector/projects 1,000,000 0 Allocation of unearmarked funds by SC Strengthen and enhanced coverage of nutrition services with a 300,000 0 IOM focus on local capacity building, quality service provision and increased surveillance in the conflict and vulnerable populations in South Sudan Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNFPA Ensuring Availability of Life Saving Reproductive Health 1,151,689 0 UNFPA Commodities and Supplies to provide Reproductive Health (RH) services for IDPs, Returnees, Refugees and other Vulnerable Populations in South Sudan Allocation of unearmarked funds by IOM Provision of WASH Assistance to Sudanese Refugees in Doro 221,847 0 UNHCR camp, Maban County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan Allocation of unearmarked funds by Samaritan's Purse Provision of emergency WASH, nutrition, and secondary 1,300,000 0 UNHCR healthcare services for refugees living in Pariang and Maban Counties Allocation of unearmarked funds by IOM Humanitarian Common Logistics Services in the Republic of 1,232,392 0 WFP South Sudan Allocation of unearmarked funds by WFP To be allocated to a specific sector/projects (Multilateral)) 1,284,000 0 WFP Allocation of unearmarked funds by WFP To be allocated to a specific sector/projects (Multilateral)) 14,766,001 0 WFP Allocation of unearmarked funds by WFP To be allocated to a specific sector/projects (Multilateral)) 22,721,352 0 WFP Allocation of unearmarked funds by CMA Strengthening the capacity of primary health care facilities to 55,417 0 WHO deliver essential and emergency services in Fangak and Nyirol counties of Jonglei State.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Party Monitoring of the World Bank Rapid Results Health Project Final Report
    Third Party Monitoring of the World Bank Rapid Results Health Project Final Report 1 / 17 Abbreviations BPHNS: Basic Package of Health and Nutrition Services CH: County Hospital CHD: County Health Department CMA: Christian Mission Aid CMD: Christian Mission for Development CO: Clinical Officer CPA: Comprehensive Peace Agreement FGD: Focus Group Discussions GO: Government GoSS: Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GoSS) HL: Health Link HPF: Health Pooled Fund IMA: IMA World Health IMC: International Medical Corps IO: In-Opposition IOM: International Organisation for Migration IP: Implementing Partner KII: Key Informant Interview LGSDP: Local Governance and Service Delivery Project. MoH: Ministry of Health NGO: Non-Governmental Organisation PHC: Primary Health Care PHCC: Primary Health Care Centre PHCU: Primary Health Care Unit PIU: Project Implementation Unit RRHP: Rapid Results Health Project SGBV: Sexual and Gender Based Violence SMC: Sudan Medical Care SSAID: South Sudan Agency for Internal Development UNKEA: Universal Network for Knowledge and Empowerment Agency WB: World Bank WV: World Vision TPM: Third Party Monitoring 2 / 17 Executive Summary and Findings 1. Introduction The World Bank’s portfolio for South Sudan contains a number of International Development Association’s (IDA) investment projects aimed at improving local governance and service delivery. Although the World Bank (WB) has put in place measures to mitigate political security and fiduciary risks, there remains a gap in managing operational risk in terms of monitoring and evaluation of its investment projects in South Sudan following the resumption of armed conflict in 2013. Due to its strong operational capacity and presence in South Sudan, WB contracted the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in June 2018 to implement Third Party Monitoring (TPM) activities of its Rapid Results Health Project (RRHP) currently being implemented in former Upper Nile State and Jonglei State, and the Local Government and Service Delivery Project (LOGOSEED).
    [Show full text]
  • Project Proposal
    Project Proposal Organization RI (Relief International) Project Title Provision, strengthening and expansion of life saving community and facility based nutrition services in Longochuk and Maban Counties in Upper Nile State Fund Code SSD­15/HSS10/SA2/N/INGO/517 Cluster Primary cluster Sub cluster NUTRITION None Project Allocation 2nd Round Standard Allocation Allocation Category Type Frontline services Project budget in US$ 200,000.00 Planned project duration 5 months Planned Start Date 01/08/2015 Planned End Date 31/12/2015 OPS Details OPS Code SSD­15/H/73004/R OPS Budget 0.00 OPS Project Ranking OPS Gender Marker Project Summary According to the South Sudan Humanitarian Response Plan 2015 Mid­Year Update, Longechuk and Maban are classified as highly vulnerable due to critical unmet needs and access constraints. Both counties have reported emergency levels of global acute malnutrition (GAM), and high mortality and morbidity rates. The dire health and nutrition situation is aggravated by emergency and crisis levels of food insecurity, and restricted humanitarian access as a result of conflict and weather constraints. In May 2015, RI conducted a rapid SMART nutrition survey in Upper Nile, which revealed a GAM prevalence of 18.9 percent (12.5 ­ 27.5) and a severe acute malnutrition (SAM) rate of 7.1 percent in Longechuk. Similarly, in Maban, the prevalence of GAM and SAM stood at 11.7 percent and 4.7 percent, respectively. The nutritional situation is likely worse in areas which were not able to be accessed due to flooding, insecurity and distance. Given the situation, there is an urgent need to expand and integrate SC, OTP, TSFP and IYCF support and promotion services with primary health care (PHC) facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Legitimacy, Identity and Conflict: the Struggle for Political Authority in Southern Sudan, 2005-2010
    Legitimacy, Identity and Conflict: The Struggle for Political Authority in Southern Sudan, 2005-2010 Sarah Lykes Washburne Doctor of Philosophy in Arab and Islamic Studies University of Exeter 2010 Legitimacy, Identity and Conflict: The Struggle for Political Authority in Southern Sudan, 2005-2010 Submitted by Sarah Lykes Washburne, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Arab and Islamic Studies, May 2010. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has been previously submitted for the award of a degree by this or any other University. ________________________________________________ Abstract The consolidation of political authority over Southern Sudan has never been achieved, nor has the region ever experienced a comprehensive, uniform system of governance. No one political group, external or internal, has ever been able to present itself as the legitimate representative of the populace of Southern Sudan. These, however, were the objectives which the Sudan People‘s Liberation Movement (SPLM) sought to achieve from 2005 to 2010. The main contention of this thesis is that the success or failures of the SPLM at post-conflict state-building can be measured through the conceptual framework of legitimacy. As a rebel movement, the SPLM fought a war of liberation against the government of Sudan from 1983 to 2004. Yet, the SPLM was not fighting for the secession of the South, as its predecessor had, but for the liberation of the country and for the creation of a ‗New Sudan‘ where all the politically marginalised groups of Sudan would be political equals.
    [Show full text]
  • Emoc South Sudan
    EmOC Emergency Obstetric Care Program FINAL REPORT South Sudan Malakal, Upper Nile State October 5, 2012 i Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... ii I. PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................... 2 III. PROJECT COMPONENTS ........................................................................................................................... 3 COMPONENT A: Training Health Workers in Emergency Obstetric Care ................................................. 3 COMPONENT B: Training Front Line Health Workers ............................................................................... 7 COMPONENT C: Community Awareness and Mobilization ...................................................................... 8 COMPONENT D: Facility Construction and Rehabilitation ...................................................................... 10 COMPONENT E: Equipment, Supplies and Drugs ................................................................................... 12 COMPONENT F: Site Activation, Operation and Supervision ................................................................. 15 IV. Challenges .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security and Emergency Markets Mapping and Analysis Assessment
    Food Security and Emergency Markets Mapping and Analysis Assessment Maiwut and Longechuk Counties, Adar State – Upper Nile, South Sudan April 2016 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Context 4 3. Food security 5 3.1. Crops 5 3.1.1. Crop performance 5 3.1.2. Crop production 5 3.2. Livestock 7 3.2.1. Livestock ownership 7 3.2.2. Milk cows and milk production 7 3.2.2.1. Milk cows 7 3.2.2.2. Milk production 8 3.2.3. Livestock diseases 8 3.2.3.1. Access to veterinary drugs and services 8 3.2.4. Livestock sales 9 3.2.5. Dry season grazing areas 10 3.2.6. Pastures and browse and livestock body conditions 10 3.3. Wild foods collection and fishing 11 3.3.1. Wild foods 11 3.3.2. Fishing 11 3.4. Trade and markets 13 3.5. Food sources, meals, dietary diversity and daily energy consumption 14 3.6. Income sources 15 3.7. Coping strategy index 16 3.8. Internally displaced persons 17 3.9. Food security outlook March to August 2016 18 3.10. Conclusion and recommendations 20 3.10.1. Conclusion 20 3.10.2. Recommendations 20 4. Emergency market mapping and analysis (EMMA) 22 4.1. EMMA methodology 22 4.2. Target population 22 4.3. Critical market systems 22 4.4. Trade flows 23 4.4.1. Baseline year (2013) 23 4.4.2. Emergency year (2016) 24 4.5. Market system map 26 4.6. Seasonal calendar 29 4.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Security and Emergency Markets Mapping and Analysis Assessment
    Food Security and Emergency Markets Mapping and Analysis Assessment Maiwut and Longechuk Counties, Adar State – Upper Nile, South Sudan April 2016 1 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Context 4 3. Food security 5 3.1. Crops 5 3.1.1. Crop performance 5 3.1.2. Crop production 5 3.2. Livestock 7 3.2.1. Livestock ownership 7 3.2.2. Milk cows and milk production 7 3.2.2.1. Milk cows 7 3.2.2.2. Milk production 8 3.2.3. Livestock diseases 8 3.2.3.1. Access to veterinary drugs and services 8 3.2.4. Livestock sales 9 3.2.5. Dry season grazing areas 10 3.2.6. Pastures and browse and livestock body conditions 10 3.3. Wild foods collection and fishing 11 3.3.1. Wild foods 11 3.3.2. Fishing 11 3.4. Trade and markets 13 3.5. Food sources, meals, dietary diversity and daily energy consumption 14 3.6. Income sources 15 3.7. Coping strategy index 16 3.8. Internally displaced persons 17 3.9. Food security outlook March to August 2016 18 3.10. Conclusion and recommendations 20 3.10.1. Conclusion 20 3.10.2. Recommendations 20 4. Emergency market mapping and analysis (EMMA) 22 4.1. EMMA methodology 22 4.2. Target population 22 4.3. Critical market systems 22 4.4. Trade flows 23 4.4.1. Baseline year (2013) 23 4.4.2. Emergency year (2016) 24 4.5. Market system map 26 4.6. Seasonal calendar 29 4.7.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Crisis Fact Sheet
    SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #11, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2018 SEPTEMBER 7, 2018 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE BY SECTOR IN FY 2018 • UNMISS and relief organizations relocate 3,500 IDPs from Juba PoC site 5% 7 million 7% • Interagency humanitarian convoy reaches 21% Estimated People in South 7% Greater Baggari area Sudan Requiring Humanitarian Assistance 10% • WFP requests $662 million for food and 2018 Humanitarian Response Plan – nutrition interventions in 2019 December 2017 20% 14% 16% HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE 5.3 million Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (21%) Estimated People in Need of Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (20%) USAID/OFDA $123,333,978 Health (16%) Food Assistance in South Sudan Nutrition (14%) IPC Technical Working Group – USAID/FFP $335,998,924 Protection (10%) January 2018 Agriculture & Food Security (7%) State/PRM3 $21,708,795 Humanitarian Coordination & Info Management (7%) Shelter & Settlements (5%) 1.85 $481,041,6974 USAID/FFP2 FUNDING TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS IN FY 2018 million BY MODALITY IN FY 2018 1% Estimated IDPs in 84% 10% 4% $3,459,885,812 South Sudan TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE OCHA – July 31, 2018 U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (84%) Local & Regional Food Procurement (10%) 1% SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FY 2014–2018, Complementary Services (4%) INCLUDING FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE Cash Transfers for Food (1%) REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES Food Vouchers (1%) 198,400 Estimated Individuals Seeking Refuge at UNMISS Bases KEY DEVELOPMENTS UNMISS – August 27, 2018 • As of September 4, UN Mission in the Republic of South Sudan (UNMISS) and relief agency staff had completed the relocation of nearly 3,500 internally displaced persons (IDPs) from UN House protection of civilians (PoC) site 3 in the capital city of Juba to a 2.5 million site in the city’s Mangateen neighborhood, the UN reports.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Border
    30 Dividing lines: Grazing and conflict along the Sudan– South Sudan border By Joshua Craze Copyright Published in Switzerland by the Small Arms Survey © Small Arms Survey, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva 2013 First published in July 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior permission in writing of the Small Arms Survey, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organi- zation. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Publications Manager, Small Arms Survey, at the address below. Small Arms Survey Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies 47 Avenue Blanc, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Series editor: Emile LeBrun Copy-edited by Emile LeBrun and Clar Ni Chonghaile Proofread by Donald Strachan ([email protected]) Cartography by Jillian Luff (www.mapgrafix.com) Typeset in Optima and Palatino by Richard Jones ([email protected]) Printed by nbmedia in Geneva, Switzerland ISBN 978-2-9700856-7-6 2 Small Arms Survey HSBA Working Paper 30 Contents Maps ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Nile State Migration Conference Held at the South
    Maban County Migration Conference held in Bunj, Upper Nile, South Sudan on 12 to 14 June 2012 REPORT Introduction This is a report of a Cross-Border Migration Conference held at the Bankuman Primary School in Bunj, Upper Nile from 12-14 June 2012, arranged by Concordis International and funded by the European Union. Background Maban County borders four counties in Upper Nile State, Renk County to the North, Melut and Baliet County to the West, and Longechuk County to the South. Blue Nile state of the Republic of Sudan borders the County to the East. Maban County possesses huge grazing land and water for livestock. Fellata pastoralists from Blue Nile state annually migrate into the county to graze their cattle on these pastures and water during dry season. During the current dry season beginning in December 2011, four clans of the nomadic Fellata tribe have migrated into the County. Since late 2011 fighting in Blue Nile state has caused a large number of refugees to enter the county. There are currently three refugee camps in Maban County with an estimated total of 100,000 refugees. Concordis organized the conference in response to local concerns about relations between the Fellata pastoralists, the host communities and the refugee populations. In the past the local Maban communities and the Fellata pastoralists have coexisted peacefully with periodic incidents such as fighting, problems between the pastoralists and farmers over grazing area and competition over resources. Both communities expressed a desire to create a mechanism for dealing with these incidents and strengthen relations between the groups.
    [Show full text]