DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Policy Research Funding Scheme 公共政策研究資助計劃

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Policy Research Funding Scheme 公共政策研究資助計劃 Public Policy Research Funding Scheme 公共政策研究資助計劃 Project Number : 項目編號： 2016.A8.051.16D Project Title : A Survey Experiment on Discontent Among the Youth: 項目名稱： Welfare or Politics? 青少年不滿源自福利或政治？一個實驗性問卷研究 Principal Investigator : Dr WONG Yee Hang, Mathew 首席研究員： 黃以恆博士 Institution/Think Tank : The University of Hong Kong 院校 ／智庫： 香港大學 Project Duration (Month): 推行期 (月) ： 12 Funding (HK$) : 總金額 (HK$)： 220,368.00 This research report is uploaded onto the website of the Policy Innovation and Co- ordination Office (PICO) for public reference. The views expressed in this report are those of the Research Team of this project and do not represent the views of PICO and/or the Assessment Panel. PICO and/or the Assessment Panel do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Please observe the “Intellectual Property Rights & Use of Project Data” as stipulated in the Guidance Notes of the Public Policy Research Funding Scheme. A suitable acknowledgement of the funding from PICO should be included in any publication/publicity arising from the work done on a research project funded in whole or in part by PICO. The English version shall prevail whenever there is any discrepancy between the English and Chinese versions. 此研究報告已上載至政策創新與統籌辦事處（創新辦）網站，供公眾查閱。報告 內所表達的意見純屬本項目研究團隊的意見，並不代表創新辦及／或評審委員會的意 見。創新辦及／或評審委員會不保證報告所載的資料準確無誤。 請遵守公共政策研究資助計劃申請須知內關於「知識產權及項目數據的使用」的 規定。 接受創新辦全數或部分資助的研究項目如因研究工作須出版任何刊物／作任何宣 傳，均須在其中加入適當鳴謝，註明獲創新辦資助。 中英文版本如有任何歧異，概以英文版本為準。 PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH FUNDING SCHEME “Welfare or Politics? A Comparative Analysis on Support for Redistribution and Political Discontent in Hong Kong” Final Report Project Number: 2016.A8.051.16D Project Title: “A Survey Experiment on Discontent Among the Youth: Welfare or Politics?” 青少年不滿源自福利或政治? 一個實驗性問卷研究 Principal Investigator: Dr Wong, Yee Hang Mathew 黃以恆博士 Institution/Think Tank: The University of Hong Kong 香港大學 Project Duration (Month): 12 Funding (HK$): 220,368 (i) Abstract Young people in Hong Kong present a real challenge to the society, and the society does not seem to understand them very well. On the one hand, their discontent about the current economic environment are regarded as evidence of their lack of competitiveness, unwillingness to work hard, and heavy reliance on government support in multiple aspects such as housing. On the other, the recent social movements demonstrated the dissatisfaction of the youth towards social and political development in Hong Kong. Yet, this was again met with criticisms from the society about their idealism and reluctant to be realistic and make concessions. The two irreconcilable images of the youth exemplify our lack of understanding of their source of dissatisfaction. More critically, is it primarily about material wellbeing or is it politically-driven? It is evident that young people are not content about their current situation and the society in general, but will they be satisfied simply with a better provision of welfare, or only with a more fundamental change in the society? The difficulty in 1 answering question lies in the fact that the two areas are naturally intertwined, and even the young people themselves might not be able to tell the difference. By applying a survey experiment on young people in Hong Kong, this research seeks to understand their real source of discontent and what factors affect their view towards welfare provided by the government. Most significantly, this research aims to suggest potential ways for the government to improve youth policies and achieve good governance. (i) 摘要 當下的年青人是香港社會的一項挑戰，但社會對年青人的認識十分有限。一方面，年青人對現 時的經濟環境不滿，被認為是他們缺乏競爭力、不願努力及在各方面(如住屋)過度依賴政府的 寫照。另一方面，近年的社會運動清楚反映年青人對社會及政治發展的不滿。這卻又被社會各 界批評為過度理想化及不願作出現實的妥協。這兩種矛盾的青年人的形象顯示我們對他們的不 滿之源未有充份理解。最關鍵的問題是，他們究竟因為物質上的享受或是政治上的訴求不滿？ 年青人表達對社會的各種不滿，但這會否單單因為增加了福利而減少，還是必須對社會有更深 層的改變？因為政治和經濟的緊密關係，這問題毫不容易解答，甚至連年青人自己亦未必能夠 清楚分辨。這個研究就是希望透過一份實驗性問卷，探討香港年青人不滿的根源，以及研究什 麼因素會改變他們對政府提供的福利的看法。本研究項目希望藉此幫助政府改善青年政策及達 致良好管治。 (ii) Background of research Youth in Hong Kong are characterised by two conflicting stereotypes both of which convey them as showing stronger signs of political discontent compared to other population sectors. The first image of young people are they are passive players in society who are socially uncompetitive and who heavily rely on government welfare. It was observed that over the years, the city saw a rise in the number of university students and graduates applying for public housing (Ming Pao, 13 January 2015). With a growing divide between the rich and poor and a society faced with problems of worsening inequality, youth discontent with a lack of opportunities and social mobility may increase their demand for government assistance and welfare policies. This is perhaps the reason why young people in Hong Kong are generally characterized by a low level of subjective wellbeing According to a survey conducted by the Central Policy Unit in 2015, among the 15-19 age group, only 14.1% expect a better future personal development, and less than 20% are satisfied with the opportunities in Hong Kong. 2 In contrast, the second image of youth in Hong Kong is very different. This stereotype suggests that young people are quite politically active and take it upon themselves to fight for their ideals, be it democracy, freedom, or a better living environment. As shown by large-scale social movements in recent years, a vast majority of participators were young people which indicates the scale of discontent felt by this population. However, the source of their dissatisfaction is not clear. While such social movements were very much political in nature, it may also have had underlying economic motives. This brings to light the possibility of young people conveying economic dissatisfaction through policy and government opposition. These contrasting images of young people in Hong Kong are at the base of this research as although their demands are very different (materialistic versus idealistic), they demonstrate a common discontent towards the government and/or the society. To better understand why young people are dissatisfied, and whether the source of their discontent comes from welfare or politics, this research proposes a conceptual framework consisting of three components, building on a study conducted on the general population of Hong Kong by Wu and Chou (2015). First, youth's welfare preference, in other words, the extent to which they support a higher level of welfare provision is identified through the use of a self-administered survey. Findings provide insight on whether young people in Hong Kong are really in need of government assistance as commonly believed, and also identifies the factors which can explain the level of welfare support. Second, the level of discontent towards different areas of governance, namely welfare, opportunities in society, quality of governance, and the system design itself is assessed. This provides a more comprehensive picture in understanding the areas in which young people are most concerned about, and whether it is primarily related to material wellbeing or politically oriented. However, simply drawing a conclusion from these two sections ignores the implicit role played by political assessment. As respondents are likely to have their attitudes on welfare spilling-over into politics, and vice versa, this study introduces a vignette treatment to unpack the relationship between the two to see if the source of youth discontent has more to do with welfare or politics. (iii) Summary on policy implications and recommendations This study provides a deeper understanding on youth attitudes towards politics and welfare in Hong Kong. It aims to assess why young people are allegedly dissatisfied with their government/society and where the source of discontent stems from. The political attitudes of young people reflect their different needs and principles. On one hand, the youth can be viewed from a materialistic and passive perspective in which they rely on government assistance for their welfare due to a lack of social mobility. Another view points towards an idealistic perspective where young people actively 3 participate to demonstrate their ideals. This study seeks to find common factors at the roots of their discontent and whether young people ultimately care more about their personal wellbeing or politics. Testing this target population on the relationship between welfare attitudes and youth discontent enables policymakers to gain insight into the reasons behind youth demand for government assistance and their dissatisfaction with social and political issues. This project finds that the youth‟s perception of welfare provision is heavily affected by economic ideology, such as whether they feel there is enough social mobility. However, their support towards a specific policy initiative is influenced by political factors. Even if they are expected to benefit from the policy, if they are dissatisfied with the government, they will discount the level of support towards a government-backed policy. The findings demonstrate that the grievances of the youth is multidimensional, not merely materialistic. Therefore, a reliance on welfare provision cannot be expected to resolve the problem. Instead, it is suggested that the government should focus on improving social relations, (re-)building trust with the youth, and building a consensus across the society. In particular, it is recommended that the existing youth consultation and participation channels should be revamped/enhanced. Specific to Hong Kong‟s housing policy, the government also has
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H
    Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I New Direction MMXX CONTENTS Hannes H. Gissurarson is Professor of Politics at the University of Iceland and Director of Research at RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre for Innovation and Economic Growth. The author of several books in Icelandic, English and Swedish, he has been on the governing boards of the Central Bank of Iceland and the Mont Pelerin Society and a Visiting Scholar at Stanford, UCLA, LUISS, George Mason and other universities. He holds a D.Phil. in Politics from Oxford University and a B.A. and an M.A. in History and Philosophy from the University of Iceland. Introduction 7 Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) 13 St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) 35 John Locke (1632–1704) 57 David Hume (1711–1776) 83 Adam Smith (1723–1790) 103 Edmund Burke (1729–1797) 129 Founded by Margaret Thatcher in 2009 as the intellectual Anders Chydenius (1729–1803) 163 hub of European Conservatism, New Direction has established academic networks across Europe and research Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) 185 partnerships throughout the world. Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850) 215 Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) 243 Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) 281 New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. Registered Office: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium President: Tomasz Poręba MEP Executive Director: Witold de Chevilly Lord Acton (1834–1902) 313 The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series: No. 85
    A Comparative Survey of DEMOCRACY, GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Working Paper Series: No. 85 Jointly Published by The Stagnated Development of Liberal Democratic Values Yu-Tzung Chang Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] & Yun-Han Chu Distinguished Research Fellow, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] Asian Barometer A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series Jointly Published by Globalbarometer The Asian Barometer (ABS) is an applied research program on public opinion on political values, democracy, and governance around the region. The regional network encompasses research teams from thirteen East Asian political systems (Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia), and five South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal). Together, this regional survey network covers virtually all major political systems in the region, systems that have experienced different trajectories of regime evolution and are currently at different stages of political transition. The ABS Working Paper Series is intended to make research result within the ABS network available to the academic community and other interested readers in preliminary form to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Scholars
    [Show full text]
  • China Perspectives, 55 | September - October 2004 the Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 2
    China Perspectives 55 | september - october 2004 Varia The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.417 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 October 2004 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Chen Lichuan, « The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century », China Perspectives [Online], 55 | september - october 2004, Online since 29 December 2008, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 ; DOI : 10.4000/ chinaperspectives.417 This text was automatically generated on 28 October 2019. © All rights reserved The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 1 The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan EDITOR'S NOTE Translated from the French original by Nick Oates 1 From the beginning of the 1980s to the middle of the 1990s, three movements took centre stage on the Chinese intellectual scene: radicalism, conservatism and liberalism. This article sets out to retrace the debate between liberalism and neo-leftism by relying exclusively on the polemical texts of the Chinese writers1. How can we present an intellectual debate that is a process of questioning and clarification and that does not arrive at a consensual conclusion? How can we render intelligible the concepts debated in extracts from the original texts? How can we evaluate the impact that this debate has had on a society undergoing a profound transformation? These are just some of the difficulties with which we were confronted.
    [Show full text]
  • In Hong Kong the Political Economy of the Asia Pacific
    The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific Fujio Mizuoka Contrived Laissez- Faireism The Politico-Economic Structure of British Colonialism in Hong Kong The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific Series editor Vinod K. Aggarwal More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7840 Fujio Mizuoka Contrived Laissez-Faireism The Politico-Economic Structure of British Colonialism in Hong Kong Fujio Mizuoka Professor Emeritus Hitotsubashi University Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan ISSN 1866-6507 ISSN 1866-6515 (electronic) The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ISBN 978-3-319-69792-5 ISBN 978-3-319-69793-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69793-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017956132 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the State
    ANATOMY OF THE STATE ANATOMY OF THE STATE MURRAY N. ROTHBARD © 2009 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute and published under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Ludwig von Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832 www.mises.org ISBN: 978-1-933550-48-0 The greatest danger to the State is independent intellectual criticism. Murray N. Rothbard CONTENTS What the State Is Not . .9 What the State Is . 13 How the State Preserves Itself . 18 How the State Transcends Its Limits . 30 What the State Fears . 44 How States Relate to One Another . 47 History as a Race Between State Power and Social Power . 53 Index . 56 7 WHAT THE STATE IS NOT he State is almost universally consid- ered an institution of social service. Some theorists venerate the State as the apotheosis of society; oth- T ers regard it as an amiable, though often inefficient, organization for achieving social ends; but almost all regard it as a necessary means for achieving the goals of mankind, a means to be ranged against the “pri- vate sector” and often winning in this compe- tition of resources. With the rise of democracy, the identification of the State with society has been redoubled, until it is common to hear sen- timents expressed which violate virtually every tenet of reason and common sense such as, “we Originally published in “Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays” by Murray N. Rothbard (Auburn, Ala.: Mises Institute, 2000 [1974]), pp. 55–88. 9 10 ANATOMY OF THE STATE are the government.” The useful collective term “we” has enabled an ideological camouflage to be thrown over the reality of political life.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberal Moments.Indb
    Atanassow, Ewa, and Alan S. Kahan. "List of Contributors." Liberal Moments: Reading Liberal Texts. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2016. vii–xi. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 27 Sep. 2021. <>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 27 September 2021, 20:27 UTC. Copyright © Ewa Atanassow, Alan S. Kahan and Contributors 2017. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. List of Contributors Ewa Atanassow is Junior Professor of Political Th ought at Bard College Berlin. Her research focuses on questions of nationhood and democratic citizenship in the liberal tradition of political thought, with an emphasis on Tocqueville. She is the co-editor (with Richard Boyd) of Tocqueville and the Frontiers of Democracy (2013). Roger Berkowitz is Founder and Academic Director of the Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities at Bard College and Associate Professor of Political Studies, Philosophy and Human Rights at Bard College. He is the author of Th e Gift of Science: Leibniz and the Modern Legal Tradition (2005) and the co-editor of Th inking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics (2009). He edits HA: Th e Journal of the Hannah Arendt Center and is co-editor of the forthcoming essay collection Artifacts of Th inking: Reading Hannah Arendt’s Denktagebuch . Reinhard Blomert is Editor-in-Chief of Leviathan , the Berlin social science quarterly. He has published extensively in the area of history and sociology of economics. He is the author of John Maynard Keynes (2007) and Adam Smith ’ s Reise nach Frankreich (2012).
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Liberalism: Ideological Traditions, Translations, and Troubles in Thailand
    In search of liberalism: Ideological traditions, translations, and troubles in Thailand TOMAS LARSSON University of Cambridge Abstract The history of political thought in Southeast Asia has overwhelmingly focused on nationalism and socialism/Marxism. Little has been written about the fate of liberalism in the region. This is in stark contrast with the literature that in recent years has emerged on liberal political thought in South Asian and East Asian contexts. Seeking to make a Southeast Asian contribution to this literature, this article asks: Is there liberalism in Thailand? To answer the question, it surveys the existing literature on Thai political thought; outlines the history of the reproduction of the Western liberal canon in Thai translation; and takes stock of contemporary political debates. What does it find? First, that while one might find liberals in Thai history, there is no liberalism. Second, that serious intellectual engagement with liberal political thought occurs comparatively late and remains modest in Thailand, but that Thai politics nevertheless has been stalked by the spectre of Rousseau for more than eight decades. Third, and finally, that some Thai intellectual historians and other writers have responded to the country’s recent political troubles – in the form of increasing political polarization, intractable and often violent conflict, two military coups, and the ill health and subsequent death of King Bhumibol – by laying the intellectual groundwork for a liberal form of Thai nationalism. Keywords: Liberalism; ideology; political thought; intellectual history; Thailand In the late 1800s, the German sociologist Werner Sombart asked a classic question of comparative historical sociology that has continued to generate debate ever since: Why is there no socialism in the United States? Likewise, in the early stages of the Cold War, when almost all Southeast Asian countries saw the eruption of Communist insurgencies, scholars sought to explain the exception of Thailand (Thompson and Adloff 1950).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Assessment Exercise 2020 Impact Case Study University: the Chinese University of Hong Kong Unit of Assessment (Uoa): 37
    1 Research Assessment Exercise 2020 Impact Case Study University: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Unit of Assessment (UoA): 37 Title of case study: Capacity Building Support Towards the Realization of LGBT Equality 1. Summary of the impact (100 words) Gender equality is not well recognized in Chinese speaking societies. Christianity is an influential factor accountable for this, particularly in the context of Hong Kong. Kung’s research supports civic engagement by reviewing Christian rights discourse (Taiwan). It also contributes to the emergence of conscientized Christian communities (Amoy CTK Fellowship in China), introduces a narrative ethics as a self-reflective tool for personal transformation and as a skill for counseling, and enhances a spirit of dialogue (Covenant of Rainbow). Kung’s impact on gender equality is recognized by the LGBT community, the Government, and is also appreciated by pro-family Christian activists. 2. Underpinning research (500 words) Lap Yan Kung is a leading theologian in Hong Kong who specializes in gender equality issues. He argues that Christianity is committed to promoting human wellbeing and fairness, and should thus embrace the idea of gender equality. Challenging Christianity’s conventional thought on sex and gender issues, Kung develops a narrative approach in doing Christian ethics. He re-frames Christian teachings on human sexuality in a more gendered-based context. Interestingly, his gendered-based re- reading of Christian traditions and teachings underscores the cultural and political aspects of the LGBT movement, and promotes a spirituality of dialogue. Unlike normative ethics, narrative ethics does not start from a deontological and teleological concern. It begins from an attentive listening of personal narrative and its interaction with other narratives, such as the family and social stories.
    [Show full text]
  • Build Back Better Britain After Coronavirus: Policy Ideas for Liberal Democrats
    Build back better Britain after coronavirus: policy ideas for Liberal Democrats Edited by Layla Moran MP Build back better Britain after coronavirus: policy ideas for Liberal Democrats Published in 2020 by Neil Fawcett on behalf of Layla Moran MP C5 Grange Court Business Park, Barton Lane, Abingdon, OX14 3NB Designed and typeset in Freight Sans Pro and Calluna by Richard Rowley and Duncan Brack All contributors have written their pieces in their own individual capacity. Their inclusion in this booklet should not be taken to mean either that they agree with every proposal in it or that they are supporting Layla Moran’s candidacy for the Liberal Democrat leadership. PDF available for download from www.LaylaMoran.com/Build_Back_Better ii Contents Build back better ii Foreword v Layla Moran 1 Introduction 1 Layla Moran 2 Economic policy and the state 4 David Howarth 3 Economics and industry 10 Duncan Brack, Josh Babarinde, Vince Cable, Helen Cross, Alyssa Gilbert, Cara Jenkinson, Jannah Patchay, Sheila Ritchie Introduction 10 Industrial strategy and Liberalism 11 Recovery rewards: locking social innovation into Economy 2.0 14 Community-based prosperity 15 Modernising financial markets 17 Climate policy after coronavirus 19 Oil and gas 23 4 Equalities 26 Paul Noblet, Helen Belcher, Tara Copeland, Ade Fatukasi, Lynne Featherstone, Jannah Patchay, Rhys Taylor A more equal country 26 A new social contract 27 Time for a universal basic income 29 A natural home for BAME voters 31 A double burden 33 Childcare and opportunity 34 Dignity not discrimination
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Barometer Conference on Democracy and Citizen Politics in East Asia
    Asian Barometer Conference on Democracy and Citizen Politics in East Asia Co-organized by Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica Taiwan Foundation for Democracy Program for East Asia Democratic Studies, IHS-NTU Center for East Asia Democratic Studies, COSS-NTU Panel II What Do They Value: Citizens’ Normative Orientations The Stagnated Development of Liberal Democratic Values Yu-Tzung Chang Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] & Yun-Han Chu Distinguished Research Fellow, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] Please do not cite or quote without the author’s permission. Paper prepared for an Asian Barometer Conference on Democracy and Citizen Politics in East Asia, June 17-18, 2013, Taipei, Taiwan. The Stagnated Development of Liberal Democratic Values Yu-tzung Chang National Taiwan University Yun-han Chu Academia Sinica and National Taiwan University Introduction For new democracies, Liberal democratic values (LDV) are critical for the process of democratic consolidation(Linz and Stepan, 1996). LDV incorporate the basic principles of democratic governance, in other words, they tell us by what principles people believe a democracy should be run (Thomassen, 2007). This chapter will focus on why the growth of LDV in East Asia has stagnated, and in some countries even reversed by comparing key findings from the ABS three Waves with relevant data from 13 countries. Our measure of LDV is a seven-item battery. None of the items in this battery mentions the “d” word (democracy). Instead, they tap into respondents’ value orientations toward four fundamental organizing principles of liberal democracy: popular accountability, political liberalism, political pluralism, and separation of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties - Takamichi Mito
    GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS – Vol. I - Political Parties - Takamichi Mito POLITICAL PARTIES Takamichi Mito, The Chinese University of Hong Kong,China Keywords: Hegemonic party system, Multi-party system, One party dominant system, One party system, Political development, Two-party system. Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Emergence of Political Parties in the Modern Era 3. Conservative and Progressive Parties 4. Classification of Political Party System 5. Political Parties in the Political System 6. Political Party Systems of the World 7. Democracy, Freedom and Party System into the Twenty-first Century Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Political parties function as a go-between the public and the government and also play many other vital roles in the political system. Functionally, they can be defined as bodies that (:?) organize public opinion and interest; transmit public demands to the government; attempt to recruit and propose political leadership; and often attempt to articulate to followers what is desirable in terms of social, economic, cultural and political development. The emergence of political parties in the modern era implies that a political system has entered a new complex stage in which political power can no longer be forced onto the public without public support and elections. According to their attitudes toward the existing political order, political parties can be termed conservative (status quo oriented) or progressive (challenger). The political party systemUNESCO can be classified as a multi-party– EOLSS system, a one party dominant (or hegemonic) system, a one party (or monopoly) system, or a two-party system. There is a strong tendencySAMPLE for a particular type of political CHAPTERS party system to prevail over time in many political systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism Undressed Jethro K
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Books 2012 Liberalism Undressed Jethro K. Lieberman New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_books Recommended Citation Lieberman, Jethro K., "Liberalism Undressed" (2012). Books. 1. https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_books/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. Liberalism Undressed JETHRO K. LIEBERMAN OXFORD VNlVIHlSlTY PJ.F.~S OXFORD VNIVBR.SITY PllBSS Oxford Univ~rst!y l'rtss is a department of the University ofOxford. It furthers the University's objective of exceilence in ruurch, scholarship, and education by pubU<bing worldwide. For Charles E. Lindblom Oxford N-York Auckbnd Cape Town Oar •• SaLum Hong Kong Karachi Kualal.umpur Madrid Melbourne MtxicoCity N•irob1 Ntw Dtlhi Sh•nghal Taipti Toronto With offices in Arg<ntma Au•tria Brazil Chilt Czech Repubhc France Greecr Guatemal• I lunguy Italy Japan Poland Portugal Sing•port South Koru Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukmnt Vietnam Oxford is a rtglstered trade nurk of Oxford University Press in the UK and certain other countries. Published In the United States of Amtrica by Oxford University Press 198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 (')Jethro K. Lieberman 2012 All rights ruerved. No part of this public•Uon maybe reproduced, ltortd in a r<triev•l system, or transmitted, in •ny form or by any means, Without the prior perm iuion 1n writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by bw, by hcense, or under terms •greed with the appropri>te reproduction right< organl10t1on.1nquirits concerni•g reproduction OUI>idt the scopt o!tht abovtshould burnt to tht Rights Deportment, Oxford Umversity Prt>S, •t tht address •hove.
    [Show full text]