Build Back Better Britain After Coronavirus: Policy Ideas for Liberal Democrats

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Build Back Better Britain After Coronavirus: Policy Ideas for Liberal Democrats Build back better Britain after coronavirus: policy ideas for Liberal Democrats Edited by Layla Moran MP Build back better Britain after coronavirus: policy ideas for Liberal Democrats Published in 2020 by Neil Fawcett on behalf of Layla Moran MP C5 Grange Court Business Park, Barton Lane, Abingdon, OX14 3NB Designed and typeset in Freight Sans Pro and Calluna by Richard Rowley and Duncan Brack All contributors have written their pieces in their own individual capacity. Their inclusion in this booklet should not be taken to mean either that they agree with every proposal in it or that they are supporting Layla Moran’s candidacy for the Liberal Democrat leadership. PDF available for download from www.LaylaMoran.com/Build_Back_Better ii Contents Build back better ii Foreword v Layla Moran 1 Introduction 1 Layla Moran 2 Economic policy and the state 4 David Howarth 3 Economics and industry 10 Duncan Brack, Josh Babarinde, Vince Cable, Helen Cross, Alyssa Gilbert, Cara Jenkinson, Jannah Patchay, Sheila Ritchie Introduction 10 Industrial strategy and Liberalism 11 Recovery rewards: locking social innovation into Economy 2.0 14 Community-based prosperity 15 Modernising financial markets 17 Climate policy after coronavirus 19 Oil and gas 23 4 Equalities 26 Paul Noblet, Helen Belcher, Tara Copeland, Ade Fatukasi, Lynne Featherstone, Jannah Patchay, Rhys Taylor A more equal country 26 A new social contract 27 Time for a universal basic income 29 A natural home for BAME voters 31 A double burden 33 Childcare and opportunity 34 Dignity not discrimination 35 5 Environment 38 Duncan Brack, Richard Hebditch Environmental policy after coronavirus 38 Protecting the global environment 39 Protecting the UK environment 41 Food, diet and agriculture 43 Putting environment at the heart of government 45 6 Health, wellbeing and social care 48 Mohsin Khan, Humaira Ali, Cara Jenkinson, Tamora Langley, Anisur Rahman Introduction 48 Valuing staff, telemedicine, addressing the backlog 49 Letting go of local hospitals 50 Redesigning where we heal, live and work 53 Aligning health and climate policy objectives 54 Time to be loud and clear on social care 56 When there is no social care set up – dial 999 57 iii 7 Education 59 Layla Moran, Humaira Ali, John Howson, Mathew Hulbert, Jo Owen Enabling the next generation to be world ready, not just exam ready 59 Resilience and education 64 Teaching staff and coronavirus 65 Making change that sticks 66 Young people 67 8 Digital technology 69 Julian Huppert, Humaira Ali, Richard Allan, Tim Clement-Jones, Ian Kearns, William Wallace A Liberal vision for digital technology 69 Committee of the Future 70 Digital communications 71 Sensing the way forwards 71 Accessing services in a digital age 72 Envisioning digital communities 73 Building a fair digital economy 74 Data, algorithms, ethics 76 Government data 77 A Digital Bill of Rights 78 Tackling fake news 79 9 Community 80 David Boyle, Keith House, Brian Paddick, Shelia Ritchie, Emily Smith Power to people 80 Trusting councils, trusting communities 86 The problem with housing 88 The High Street post coronavirus 90 What coronavirus has taught us about policing 91 10 International relations 94 Christine Cheng, Martin Horwood, Peter Frankopan, Whit Mason, Fionna Tod, Irina von Wiese A liberal voice in a changed world 94 The new order 95 Breaking the cycle of neglect in global health 97 Embracing and confronting China 98 Development will be tougher than ever, but change is possible 101 The pandemic and human rights 103 The UK needs to reimagine influence 105 11 Politics 108 Layla Moran, Duncan Brack, Mike Smithson What the party needs to do 108 Cooperating without pacts: the Ashdown – Blair ‘project’ 114 Polling and prospects 116 Contributors 118 iv Foreword Layla Moran The assertion that ‘Britain is at a crossroads’ is one of the most tenacious clichés of modern politics. Scarcely an election – in recent times, even a year – passes without us being told that our choices will set the country’s course for decades to come. The financial crash of 2008, the coalition, the EU referendum – all significant, all noteworthy, and in the case of Brexit, incomplete. Yet all pale into insignificance when compared to the coronavirus crisis and its impacts. These pose both a threat and an opportunity for our party, the country and indeed, the world. The coronavirus pandemic has affected our lives like no crisis since the Second World War. The future role of the state, international trade, the links between private business and the public realm, global governance over problems that defy purely national solutions – all require new thinking and new approaches. And these challenges have come on top of existing emergencies, including climate change, the destruction of the natural environment and the floods of refugees fleeing from war and poverty. The democratic vision and humane values of Liberalism – promoting individual liberty and global justice, reconciling freedom and fairness, dispersing significant concentrations of wealth and power – are needed as never before. With great need comes great opportunity. In normal times, an appetite for improvement is often balanced by a fear of change. Voters’ caution is a sentiment that we politicians ignore at our peril. That’s where we must start. We recognise that people are scared. Their lives and their livelihoods have never felt more fragile. They seek certainty, steadiness and answers. But – and this is the truly exciting part – people are also beginning to see the opportunity for a transformation of the world as we know it. And therein lies the opportunity for the Liberal Democrats. How do we seize this moment and respond in a way that both reassures the British people, amid the pain that will undoubtedly continue, and drives a new Liberal settlement at the end of it? That is the purpose behind this booklet, which contains contributions from forty Liberal Democrat party members and sympathisers. I asked them to consider what party policy should be for Britain after coronavirus – whether the changed political and economic circumstances require new policy prescriptions, or whether they reinforce and highlight the case for our existing proposals. You can decide for yourself whether you think they met the challenge – but whether they did or not, I hope they stimulate you to think about new ideas and new approaches. Because we Liberal Democrats are the party of ideas or we are nothing. ~ I must emphasise that this booklet does not form part of my candidacy for the Liberal Democrat leadership. When I first decided to ask friends and colleagues whether they would be prepared to contribute to it, the leadership election was scheduled to kick off in May 2021. After it was brought forward to the summer of this year, we decided to accelerate the booklet’s production in order to be able to contribute to the policy debate within the party as the country emerges from lockdown. v Neither is this a manifesto – there are important topics that are not discussed here – but we have tried to cover the main areas of policy where we think the party would benefit from looking again at existing policies in the light of the pandemic and its impacts. All contributors have written their pieces in their own individual capacity. Their inclusion in this booklet should not be taken to mean either that they agree with every proposal in it – I’m not sure I do! – or that they are supporting me for the leadership. I want to put on record my warmest thanks to them all for their hard work over a very short period, and particularly to the lead authors for each chapter – David Boyle, Duncan Brack, Christine Cheng, Martin Horwood, David Howarth, Julian Huppert, Mohsin Khan and Paul Noblet – who coordinated the input from their colleagues and pulled the chapters together. My thanks also to those contributors who had to remain anonymous for professional reasons, to Richard Rowley for the design and, especially, to my editorial team of Duncan Brack and Gareth Lewis Shelton, who liaised with contributors and processed and edited their contributions; without them this booklet would not have happened. Layla Moran MP June 2020 vi 1 Introduction Layla Moran The world is facing the greatest economic, political and social upheaval in peacetime. It is seeing the greatest depression in possibly 300 years. There has not been such a sea change in the way people live in much of the world since the Second World War. Much of what we took for normal in February 2020 is gone. Much of it will never come back. Many of the changes that we will see are simply adjustments that were going to come in time. These have been accelerated and concertinaed from a ten-year period to ten weeks. Others are changes and challenges that will be entirely new in the making. If these are managed well, they could lead to the emergence of a better, cleaner, tolerant, happier and more equitable world. Left to their own devices, they could lead to a more divided, polluted, angrier and selfish world. Out of the ashes of World War II came the NHS and Beveridge’s five pillars of welfare. It produced the United Nations, the Marshall Aid plan, the end of colonialism and the European Steel and Coal Community – the precursor to today’s European Union. But it also led to the Cold War, the never- ending Middle East crisis, the nuclear arms race, the division of Germany and the still-divided Korea of today. As Sun Tzu wrote in The Art of War, ‘In the midst of chaos, there is also opportunity’. That applies to a post-coronavirus world as much as anywhere else. Just last year, politicians mocked anything that was slightly out of the ordinary.
Recommended publications
  • England's Local Elections 2018: the Lib Dems' Performance Was
    Democratic Audit: England’s local elections 2018: the Lib Dems’ performance was underwhelming – but these were not the elections to judge the party on Page 1 of 4 England’s local elections 2018: the Lib Dems’ performance was underwhelming – but these were not the elections to judge the party on Despite media headlines to the contrary, the Liberal Democrats’ performance in the recent local elections was pretty underwhelming, explains David Cutts. But it is the 2019 local elections that will tell us more about the long- term viability of the party, since those will concern a larger number of English districts where the Lib Dems will be seeking to reclaim ground lost to the Conservatives since 2010. Vince Cable. Picture: Richter Frank-Jurgen, via a (CC BY-SA 2.0) licence Liberals have a longstanding attachment to the local. Aside from their enduring commitment to community politics, the Liberal Democrats have always relied on winning council seats and running local councils to counter voters’ electoral credibility concerns. The formula has always been a simple one: grassroots politics provided the basis for winning seats and building local core support. Elected councillors would ‘fly the flag’ for the party through their ‘all year round’ activism. With the help of national party strategists, they would become experienced, skilled local campaigners adept at targeting and recruiting activists, and building local party organisations. Local success boosted the party’s chances in Westminster elections as voters were more likely to support the Liberal Democrats where it had a chance of winning, thereby diluting concerns that voting for the party would be a wasted effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H
    Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I New Direction MMXX CONTENTS Hannes H. Gissurarson is Professor of Politics at the University of Iceland and Director of Research at RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre for Innovation and Economic Growth. The author of several books in Icelandic, English and Swedish, he has been on the governing boards of the Central Bank of Iceland and the Mont Pelerin Society and a Visiting Scholar at Stanford, UCLA, LUISS, George Mason and other universities. He holds a D.Phil. in Politics from Oxford University and a B.A. and an M.A. in History and Philosophy from the University of Iceland. Introduction 7 Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) 13 St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) 35 John Locke (1632–1704) 57 David Hume (1711–1776) 83 Adam Smith (1723–1790) 103 Edmund Burke (1729–1797) 129 Founded by Margaret Thatcher in 2009 as the intellectual Anders Chydenius (1729–1803) 163 hub of European Conservatism, New Direction has established academic networks across Europe and research Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) 185 partnerships throughout the world. Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850) 215 Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) 243 Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) 281 New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. Registered Office: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium President: Tomasz Poręba MEP Executive Director: Witold de Chevilly Lord Acton (1834–1902) 313 The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fundamental Articles of I.AM Cyborg Law
    Beijing Law Review, 2020, 11, 911-946 https://www.scirp.org/journal/blr ISSN Online: 2159-4635 ISSN Print: 2159-4627 The Fundamental Articles of I.AM Cyborg Law Stephen Castell CASTELL Consulting, Witham, UK How to cite this paper: Castell, S. (2020). Abstract The Fundamental Articles of I.AM Cyborg Law. Beijing Law Review, 11, 911-946. Author Isaac Asimov first fictionally proposed the “Three Laws of Robotics” https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2020.114055 in 1942. The word “cyborg” appeared in 1960, describing imagined beings with both artificial and biological parts. My own 1973 neologisms, “neural Received: November 2, 2020 plug compatibility”, and “softwiring” predicted the computer software-driven Accepted: December 15, 2020 Published: December 18, 2020 future evolution of man-machine neural interconnection and synthesis. To- day, Human-AI Brain Interface cyborg experiments and “brain-hacking” de- Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and vices are being trialed. The growth also of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Scientific Research Publishing Inc. Data Analytics software and increasing instances of “Government by Algo- This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International rithm” have revealed these advances as being largely unregulated, with insuf- License (CC BY 4.0). ficient legal frameworks. In a recent article, I noted that, with automation of http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ legal processes and judicial decision-making being increasingly discussed, Open Access RoboJudge has all but already arrived; and I discerned also the cautionary Castell’s Second Dictum: “You cannot construct an algorithm that will relia- bly decide whether or not any algorithm is ethical”.
    [Show full text]
  • Julian HUPPERT Cambridge’S Independently-Minded Local Champion
    16 Signet Court, Swann’s Road, Cambridge CB5 8LA (01223) 304 421 CV [email protected] @julianhuppert | www.julianhuppert.org.uk Julian HUPPERT Cambridge’s independently-minded local champion PERSONAL BIOGRAPHY I came to Cambridge when I was three months old and attended local HOBBIES & INTERESTS: schools. I studied Natural Sciences at Trinity College, Cambridge. I’ve always loved cycling and hiking, Following completion of a PhD, I worked as a research scientist for and in my spare time I love to several years and set up my own small biotech company. escape to the mountains I was elected as a local councillor in Cambridge in 2001 and as the MP somewhere. for Cambridge in 2010. If at home, I like to listen to music, go CAMPAIGN RECORD to the cinema or spend time in Cambridge’s many fantastic independent cafes and pubs. Standing up for our local NHS “Protecting our local health service - especially mental health - is so important to me. In 2014 I led a debate in Parliament calling for more investment in our NHS here in Cambridge. I was delighted recently when the Government announced local NHS services will receive £20m extra investment next year. Along with Lib Dem colleagues, I am fighting for an investment of £8bn per year into our NHS by 2020.” Fairer funding for our school children “For over 30 years, schools in Cambridgeshire have been massively underfunded - receiving £600 per pupil per year less than the English average. I’ve campaigned for fairer school funding since I was elected as a councillor back in 2001, and from this April local schools will receive £23.2m each year more in funding.” Securing funding for Chesterton station and the Chisholm Trail “For over 15 years I have campaigned for a new station in Chesterton, and in this Parliament the deal was finally agreed! Tackling congestion across Cambridge is vital if our city is to continue to thrive.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday 27 February 2019 Order Paper No.258: Part 1
    Wednesday 27 February 2019 Order Paper No.258: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Deferred divisions will take place in the ‘No’ Lobby between 11.30am and 2.00pm Afterwards Oral Questions: Wales 12 noon Oral Questions: Prime Minister 12.30pm Urgent Questions, Ministerial Statements (if any) Up to 20 minutes Ten Minute Rule Motion: Planning (Affordable Housing and Land Compensation) (Helen Hayes) No debate Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) (No. 2) Bill: Second and Third Reading Until any hour* Business of the House (Today) (Motion) (*if the 7.00pm Business of the House Motion is agreed to) Until 7.00pm UK’s withdrawal from the European Union (Motion) No debate after Joint Committee on the draft Domestic Abuse Bill (Motion) 7.00pm No debate Presentation of Public Petitions Until 7.30pm or for Adjournment Debate: Older people’s dental health (Andrew half an hour Selous) WESTMINSTER HALL 9.30am Eating Disorders Awareness week 11.00am Adriatic Land 5 Ltd, Stevenage (The sitting will be suspended from 11.30am to 2.30pm.) 2.30pm Future of the Department for International Development 4.00pm Role of unincorporated associations in electoral funding 4.30pm Rights and protections for residents of leisure park homes 2 Wednesday 27 February 2019 OP No.258: Part 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 3 Chamber 16 Deferred Divisions 18 Westminster Hall 19 Written Statements 20 Committees meeting today 26 Committee reports published today 27 Announcements 29 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 32 A. Calendar of Business 48 B. Remaining Orders and Notices Notes: Item marked [R] indicates that a member has declared a relevant interest.
    [Show full text]
  • STRONGER ECONOMY, FAIRER SOCIETY Welcome to the Directory for the Liberal Democrat Autumn 2014 Federal Conference
    LIBERAL DEMOCRATS AUTUMN CONFERENCE DIRECTORY GLASGOW 4TH-8TH OCTOBER 2014 Clear print version This clear print version of the Conference Directory matches as closely as possible the text of the published Directory. Page number cross references are correct within this clear print document. Some information may appear in a different place from its location in the published Directory. Complex layouts and graphics have been omitted. Some pages, such as the map of Glasgow and venue and exhibition plans, are available as separate documents at www.libdems.org.uk/conference_papers A plain text version of the Directory is available at www.libdems.org.uk/conference_papers The Directory and other conference publications, in PDF, plain text and clear print formats, are available online at www.libdems.org.uk/conference_papers Edited by Emma Price and published by The Conference Office, Liberal Democrats, 8–10 Great George Street, London SW1P 3AE. Designed and produced by Mike Cooper, [email protected]. STRONGER ECONOMY, FAIRER SOCIETY Welcome to the Directory for the Liberal Democrat Autumn 2014 Federal Conference. Conference venue Scottish Exhibition and Conference Centre (SECC) Exhibition Way, Glasgow, G3 8YW www.secc.co.uk Conference hotel Crowne Plaza Glasgow Congress Road, Glasgow, G3 8QT www.crowneplazaglasgow.co.uk Official fringe venue Hotel Campanile Glasgow 10 Tunnel Street, Glasgow, G3 8HL www.campanile-glasgow-secc.co.uk If you have any questions whilst at conference please ask a conference steward or go to the Information Desk in the foyer of the Clyde Auditorium. For the details of conference sessions, motions etc. and auditorium information, see the separate Agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series: No. 85
    A Comparative Survey of DEMOCRACY, GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Working Paper Series: No. 85 Jointly Published by The Stagnated Development of Liberal Democratic Values Yu-Tzung Chang Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] & Yun-Han Chu Distinguished Research Fellow, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] Asian Barometer A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series Jointly Published by Globalbarometer The Asian Barometer (ABS) is an applied research program on public opinion on political values, democracy, and governance around the region. The regional network encompasses research teams from thirteen East Asian political systems (Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia), and five South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal). Together, this regional survey network covers virtually all major political systems in the region, systems that have experienced different trajectories of regime evolution and are currently at different stages of political transition. The ABS Working Paper Series is intended to make research result within the ABS network available to the academic community and other interested readers in preliminary form to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Scholars
    [Show full text]
  • China Perspectives, 55 | September - October 2004 the Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 2
    China Perspectives 55 | september - october 2004 Varia The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.417 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 October 2004 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Chen Lichuan, « The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century », China Perspectives [Online], 55 | september - october 2004, Online since 29 December 2008, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 ; DOI : 10.4000/ chinaperspectives.417 This text was automatically generated on 28 October 2019. © All rights reserved The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 1 The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan EDITOR'S NOTE Translated from the French original by Nick Oates 1 From the beginning of the 1980s to the middle of the 1990s, three movements took centre stage on the Chinese intellectual scene: radicalism, conservatism and liberalism. This article sets out to retrace the debate between liberalism and neo-leftism by relying exclusively on the polemical texts of the Chinese writers1. How can we present an intellectual debate that is a process of questioning and clarification and that does not arrive at a consensual conclusion? How can we render intelligible the concepts debated in extracts from the original texts? How can we evaluate the impact that this debate has had on a society undergoing a profound transformation? These are just some of the difficulties with which we were confronted.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vote, Vte, Vote
    Vote, vote, vote Exploring European Electoral Systems AUTHORS Antoaneta Asenova, Skirmantas Baikauskas, Anouk van Brug, Hunor Deak, Benjamin Fievet, Rowan Fitton, Andre Gruber, Soni Harizanov, Lucas Honoré, Arthur Kharytonov, Mijat Kontic, Ashmita Krishna, Roman Leuta, Christoph Gerrit von Zedlitz. Liesen, Lukas Lunøe, Teresė Škutaitė, Olha Tsurkan and Editors: Chris Giapitzis-Papandreou & Danica Vihinen Cover design: Edgaras Mascinskas Published by the European Liberal Forum asbl with the support of LYMEC. Co-funded by the European Parliament. Neither the European Parliament nor the European Liberal Forum asbl are responsible for the content of this publication, or for any use that may be made of it. The views expressed herein are those of the authors alone. These views do not necessarily reflect those of the European Parliament, the European Liberal Forum asbl, or LYMEC. © 2018 European Liberal Forum First Printing: 2018 ISBN 978-0-244-99376-4 ELF European Liberal Forum, asbl Brussels, Belgium www.liberalforum.eu– LYMEC European Liberal Youth, asbl Brussels, Belgium www.lymec.eu– Contents Introduction by LYMEC Secretary General Danica Vihinen .......................................................................................... 4 Foreword by LYMEC President Svenja Hahn ................. 5 Different election systems - an introduction and political discussion ................................................................... 8 Journey through EU election systems ............................ 13 What qualities should the European Parliamentary
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL AGENDA AUTUMN ONLINE CONFERENCE 2-11 October 2020
    FINAL AGENDA AUTUMN ONLINE CONFERENCE 2-11 October 2020 9 1 CONTENTS Table of Contents 2 Section A (Enabling Motions) 10 Enabling Motions A01 Standing Orders Committee (SOC) Report 10 Enabling Motions A02 Amendments to Standing Orders for the Conduct of Conference 11 to enable an online and telephone Extraordinary Conference to be held in Autumn 2020 Enabling Motions A03 Enabling Motion for an Extraordinary Autumn Conference 2020 12 to be held online Section A – Main Agenda 14 A1 Standing Orders Committee Report 14 A2 Green Party Executive Report 37 A3 Treasurers Report 46 A4 Green Party Regional Council Report 47 A5 Dispute Resolution Committee Report 50 A6 Policy Development Committee Report 54 A7 Complaint Managers Report 57 A8 Campaigns Committee Report 58 A9 Conferences Committee Report 58 A10 Equality and Diversity Committee Report 58 A11 Green World Editorial Board Report 58 A12 Framework Development Group report 58 A13 Climate Emergency Policy Working Group Report 58 Section B 60 B1 Food and Agriculture Voting Paper 60 Amendment 2a 60 Amendment 1a 61 Amendment 2b 61 Amendment 1b 61 Amendment 1c 62 Amendment 1d 62 Amendment 2c 64 2 3 Section C 65 C1 Deforestation (Fast Tracked) 65 C2 Car and vans to go zero carbon by 2030 65 C3 Ban on advertising of high-carbon goods and services 65 C4 The 2019 General Election Manifesto and Climate Change Mitigation 66 Amendment 1 67 Amendment 2 67 C5 Adopt the Principle of Rationing to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Arising from Travel, 67 Amending the Climate Emergency and the Transport Chapters of PSS C6 Updating the philosophical basis to reflect doughnut economics 68 Amendment 1 69 C7 Self Declaration of Gender 69 C8 Animal Rights: Fireworks; limit use and quiet 70 C9 Access to Fertility Treatment 70 Section D 71 D1 Winning over workers is crucial to fighting climate change.
    [Show full text]