DOCSLIB.ORG

Liberal Moments.Indb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Liberal Moments.Indb Atanassow, Ewa, and Alan S. Kahan. "List of Contributors." Liberal Moments: Reading Liberal Texts. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama, 2016. vii–xi. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 27 Sep. 2021. <>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 27 September 2021, 20:27 UTC. Copyright © Ewa Atanassow, Alan S. Kahan and Contributors 2017. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. List of Contributors Ewa Atanassow is Junior Professor of Political Th ought at Bard College Berlin. Her research focuses on questions of nationhood and democratic citizenship in the liberal tradition of political thought, with an emphasis on Tocqueville. She is the co-editor (with Richard Boyd) of Tocqueville and the Frontiers of Democracy (2013). Roger Berkowitz is Founder and Academic Director of the Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities at Bard College and Associate Professor of Political Studies, Philosophy and Human Rights at Bard College. He is the author of Th e Gift of Science: Leibniz and the Modern Legal Tradition (2005) and the co-editor of Th inking in Dark Times: Hannah Arendt on Ethics and Politics (2009). He edits HA: Th e Journal of the Hannah Arendt Center and is co-editor of the forthcoming essay collection Artifacts of Th inking: Reading Hannah Arendt’s Denktagebuch . Reinhard Blomert is Editor-in-Chief of Leviathan , the Berlin social science quarterly. He has published extensively in the area of history and sociology of economics. He is the author of John Maynard Keynes (2007) and Adam Smith ’ s Reise nach Frankreich (2012). Nicholas Capaldi is Legendre-Soule Distinguished Chair of Business Ethics at Loyola University, New Orleans. He is the author of Hume’s Place in Moral Philosophy (1986), John Stuart Mill (2005) and Liberty and Equality in Political Economy (2016). Emmanuelle de Champs is Professor of British Civilisation at the University of Cergy-Pontoise and an intellectual historian. She has widely published on Bentham and classical utilitarianism. Her latest book, Enlightenment and Utility, Bentham in France, Bentham in French , was published in 2015 by Cambridge University Press. Aurelian Craiutu is Professor of Political Th eory at Indiana University, Bloomington. He has published extensively on modern French political thought LLiberaliberal MMoments.indboments.indb vviiii 66/19/2017/19/2017 88:09:07:09:07 AAMM viii List of Contributors exploring its tradition of political moderation from Montesquieu and Guizot to Tocqueville and Aron. His most recent book is Faces of Moderation: Th e Art of Balance in an Age of Extremes (2016). George Crowder is Dean of the School of Social and Policy Studies and Professor of Political Th eory, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. His books include Liberalism and Value Pluralism (2002), Isaiah Berlin: Liberty and Pluralism (2004) and Th e One and the Many: Reading Isaiah Berlin (co-edited with Henry Hardy, 2007). Joshua Derman is Associate Professor of Humanities at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and the author of Max Weber in Politics and Social Th ought: From Charisma to Canonization (2012). Nouh El Harmouzi is Director of the Arab Center for Scientifi c Research and Humane Studies and University Professor at Ibn Toufail University, Morocco. He is the author of Islamic Foundations of a Free Society (2016); Th e Causes of the Failure of the Arab World (2012) in Arabic; and Th e Underdevelopment in the Arab Muslim Countries (2011) in French. Robert Neil Harris tutors at New College and lectures in the Department of Modern Languages, University of Oxford and is a visiting scholar in philosophy at the Ludwig-Maximilian University in Munich. He specializes in nineteenth- century Russian intellectual history. His publications include ‘Granovsky, Herzen and Chicherin: Hegel and the Battle for Russia’s Soul’, in Hegel’s Th ought in Europe: Currents, Crosscurrents and Undercurrents , ed. Lisa Herzog (2013); ‘Alexander Herzen: Writings on the Man and his Th ought’, in A Herzen Reader , ed. and trans. K. Parth é (2012); ‘Society and the Individual: State and Private Education in Russia during the 19th and 20th Centuries’, in Politics, Modernisation and Educational Reform in Russia from Past to Present , ed. David Johnson (2010). Iv á n Jaksi ć is Director of the Santiago Program of the Bing Overseas Studies Program, Stanford University. He is the author of Academic Rebels in Chile: Th e Role of Philosophy in Higher Education and Politics (1989), Andr é s Bello: Scholarship and Nation-Building in Nineteenth-Century Latin America (2001), Th e Hispanic World and American Intellectual Life, 1820-1880 (2007) and numerous edited, co-edited or co-authored books. LLiberaliberal MMoments.indboments.indb vviiiiii 66/19/2017/19/2017 88:09:07:09:07 AAMM List of Contributors ix Jeremy Jennings is Head of the School of Politics and Economics at King’s College London. He has published extensively on the history of political thought in France and is now completing a book entitled Travels with Tocqueville. Edwige Kacenelenbogen has taught political science at Sciences Po (Menton and Aix-en Provence), as well as economics at La Sorbonne/Paris 1, the International University of Monaco and the University of Nice. She now works for various fi rms specializing in strategy and organizational consulting. She is the author of ‘ Le nouvel id é al politique’ (2013), which received the Raymond Aron prize. Alan S. Kahan is Professor of British Civilization at the Universit é de Versailles/ St. Quentin and author of the books Tocqueville, Democracy, and Religion: Checks and Balances for Democratic Souls; Mind vs. Money: Th e War Between Intellectuals and Capitalism; Alexis de Tocqueville; Liberalism in Nineteenth-Century Europe: Th e Political Culture of Limited Suff rage; Aristocratic Liberalism: Th e Social and Political Th ought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. He is the translator of Tocqueville’s Th e Old Regime and the Revolution and Benjamin Constant’s Commentary on Filangieri’s Work . James Kloppenberg is Charles Warren Professor of American History. He is the author of Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Th ought , 1870-1920 (1986); T he Virtues of Liberalism (1998); Reading Obama: Dreams, Hope, and the American Political Tradition (2nd edn, 2011); Toward Democracy: Th e Struggle for Self-Rule in European and American Th ought (2016); and two co-edited books, A Companion to American Th ought (1995) and Th e Worlds of American Intellectual History (2017). Catherine Larr è re is Professor of Philosophy emerita at the University of Paris I/Panth é on Sorbonne. She is the author, among other works, of Actualit é de Montesquieu (1999), ‘Economics and Commerce’ in Montesquieu’s Human Science, Essays on the Spirit of the Laws , ed. David W Carrithers, Michael A. Mosher and Paul A. Rahe (2001) and ‘Montesquieu et le “doux commerce”:un paradigme du lib é ralisme?’ Cahiers d’Histoire , Revue d’histoire critique. Les lib é ralismes en question, XVIIIe-XXIe siè cles , no. 123, April–June 2014, pp. 21–38. Michel Mas ł owski is Professor Emeritus at the University of Paris-Sorbonne, member of PAN (Polish Academy of Learning), Commander of the Order of Academic Palms and Knight of the Order of Polonia Restituta. He is the author of Gestures, Symbols and Rites in Polish Romantic Th eatre (1998), in Polish; LLiberaliberal MMoments.indboments.indb iixx 66/19/2017/19/2017 88:09:07:09:07 AAMM.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H
    Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I New Direction MMXX CONTENTS Hannes H. Gissurarson is Professor of Politics at the University of Iceland and Director of Research at RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre for Innovation and Economic Growth. The author of several books in Icelandic, English and Swedish, he has been on the governing boards of the Central Bank of Iceland and the Mont Pelerin Society and a Visiting Scholar at Stanford, UCLA, LUISS, George Mason and other universities. He holds a D.Phil. in Politics from Oxford University and a B.A. and an M.A. in History and Philosophy from the University of Iceland. Introduction 7 Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) 13 St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) 35 John Locke (1632–1704) 57 David Hume (1711–1776) 83 Adam Smith (1723–1790) 103 Edmund Burke (1729–1797) 129 Founded by Margaret Thatcher in 2009 as the intellectual Anders Chydenius (1729–1803) 163 hub of European Conservatism, New Direction has established academic networks across Europe and research Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) 185 partnerships throughout the world. Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850) 215 Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) 243 Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) 281 New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. Registered Office: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium President: Tomasz Poręba MEP Executive Director: Witold de Chevilly Lord Acton (1834–1902) 313 The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 'History, Method and Pluralism: a Re-Interpretation of Isaiah Berlin's
    HISTORY, METHOD, AND PLURALISM A Re-interpretation of Isaiah Berlin’s Political Thought Thesis submitted to the University of London for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by HAOYEH London School of Economics and Political Science 2005 UMI Number: U205195 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U205195 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 S 510 Abstract of the Thesis In the literature on Berlin to date, two broad approaches to study his political thought can be detected. The first is the piecemeal approach, which tends to single out an element of Berlin’s thought (for example, his distinction between negative liberty and positive liberty) for exposition or criticism, leaving other elements unaccounted. And the second is the holistic approach, which pays attention to the overall structure of Berlin’s thought as a whole, in particular the relation between his defence for negative liberty and pluralism. This thesis is to defend the holistic approach against the piecemeal approach, but its interpretation will differ from the two representative readings, offered by Claude J.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series: No. 85
    A Comparative Survey of DEMOCRACY, GOVERNANCE AND DEVELOPMENT Working Paper Series: No. 85 Jointly Published by The Stagnated Development of Liberal Democratic Values Yu-Tzung Chang Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] & Yun-Han Chu Distinguished Research Fellow, Institute of Political Science, Academia Sinica Professor, Department of Political Science, National Taiwan University [email protected] Asian Barometer A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series Jointly Published by Globalbarometer The Asian Barometer (ABS) is an applied research program on public opinion on political values, democracy, and governance around the region. The regional network encompasses research teams from thirteen East Asian political systems (Japan, Mongolia, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia), and five South Asian countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and Nepal). Together, this regional survey network covers virtually all major political systems in the region, systems that have experienced different trajectories of regime evolution and are currently at different stages of political transition. The ABS Working Paper Series is intended to make research result within the ABS network available to the academic community and other interested readers in preliminary form to encourage discussion and suggestions for revision before final publication. Scholars
    [Show full text]
  • China Perspectives, 55 | September - October 2004 the Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 2
    China Perspectives 55 | september - october 2004 Varia The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 DOI: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.417 ISSN: 1996-4617 Publisher Centre d'étude français sur la Chine contemporaine Printed version Date of publication: 1 October 2004 ISSN: 2070-3449 Electronic reference Chen Lichuan, « The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century », China Perspectives [Online], 55 | september - october 2004, Online since 29 December 2008, connection on 28 October 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/chinaperspectives/417 ; DOI : 10.4000/ chinaperspectives.417 This text was automatically generated on 28 October 2019. © All rights reserved The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century 1 The Debate Between Liberalism and Neo-Leftism at the Turn of the Century Chen Lichuan EDITOR'S NOTE Translated from the French original by Nick Oates 1 From the beginning of the 1980s to the middle of the 1990s, three movements took centre stage on the Chinese intellectual scene: radicalism, conservatism and liberalism. This article sets out to retrace the debate between liberalism and neo-leftism by relying exclusively on the polemical texts of the Chinese writers1. How can we present an intellectual debate that is a process of questioning and clarification and that does not arrive at a consensual conclusion? How can we render intelligible the concepts debated in extracts from the original texts? How can we evaluate the impact that this debate has had on a society undergoing a profound transformation? These are just some of the difficulties with which we were confronted.
    [Show full text]
  • In Hong Kong the Political Economy of the Asia Pacific
    The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific Fujio Mizuoka Contrived Laissez- Faireism The Politico-Economic Structure of British Colonialism in Hong Kong The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific Series editor Vinod K. Aggarwal More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7840 Fujio Mizuoka Contrived Laissez-Faireism The Politico-Economic Structure of British Colonialism in Hong Kong Fujio Mizuoka Professor Emeritus Hitotsubashi University Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan ISSN 1866-6507 ISSN 1866-6515 (electronic) The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ISBN 978-3-319-69792-5 ISBN 978-3-319-69793-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69793-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017956132 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Policy Research Funding Scheme 公共政策研究資助計劃
    Public Policy Research Funding Scheme 公共政策研究資助計劃 Project Number : 項目編號： 2016.A8.051.16D Project Title : A Survey Experiment on Discontent Among the Youth: 項目名稱： Welfare or Politics? 青少年不滿源自福利或政治？一個實驗性問卷研究 Principal Investigator : Dr WONG Yee Hang, Mathew 首席研究員： 黃以恆博士 Institution/Think Tank : The University of Hong Kong 院校 ／智庫： 香港大學 Project Duration (Month): 推行期 (月) ： 12 Funding (HK$) : 總金額 (HK$)： 220,368.00 This research report is uploaded onto the website of the Policy Innovation and Co- ordination Office (PICO) for public reference. The views expressed in this report are those of the Research Team of this project and do not represent the views of PICO and/or the Assessment Panel. PICO and/or the Assessment Panel do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Please observe the “Intellectual Property Rights & Use of Project Data” as stipulated in the Guidance Notes of the Public Policy Research Funding Scheme. A suitable acknowledgement of the funding from PICO should be included in any publication/publicity arising from the work done on a research project funded in whole or in part by PICO. The English version shall prevail whenever there is any discrepancy between the English and Chinese versions. 此研究報告已上載至政策創新與統籌辦事處（創新辦）網站，供公眾查閱。報告 內所表達的意見純屬本項目研究團隊的意見，並不代表創新辦及／或評審委員會的意 見。創新辦及／或評審委員會不保證報告所載的資料準確無誤。 請遵守公共政策研究資助計劃申請須知內關於「知識產權及項目數據的使用」的 規定。 接受創新辦全數或部分資助的研究項目如因研究工作須出版任何刊物／作任何宣 傳，均須在其中加入適當鳴謝，註明獲創新辦資助。 中英文版本如有任何歧異，概以英文版本為準。 PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH FUNDING SCHEME “Welfare or Politics? A Comparative Analysis on Support for Redistribution and Political Discontent in Hong Kong” Final Report Project Number: 2016.A8.051.16D Project Title: “A Survey Experiment on Discontent Among the Youth: Welfare or Politics?” 青少年不滿源自福利或政治? 一個實驗性問卷研究 Principal Investigator: Dr Wong, Yee Hang Mathew 黃以恆博士 Institution/Think Tank: The University of Hong Kong 香港大學 Project Duration (Month): 12 Funding (HK$): 220,368 (i) Abstract Young people in Hong Kong present a real challenge to the society, and the society does not seem to understand them very well.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Isaiah Berlin, Oral History Interview – 4/12/1965 Administrative Information
    Sir Isaiah Berlin, Oral History Interview – 4/12/1965 Administrative Information Creator: Sir Isaiah Berlin Interviewer: Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. Date of Interview: April 12, 1965 Place of Interview: Washington, D.C. Length: 23 pages Biographical Note Berlin, a professor of social and political theory at Oxford University from 1957 to 1967, discusses conversations he had with John F. Kennedy (JFK) about political theory and Russian politics, and compares JFK to other political leaders throughout history, among other issues. Access Open. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed June 29, 1971, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Jewish (If Anything) About Isaiah Berlin’S Philosophy?
    Religions 2012, 3, 289–319; doi:10.3390/rel3020289 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article What is Jewish (If Anything) about Isaiah Berlin’s Philosophy? Arie M. Dubnov Department of History, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Building 200, Stanford CA 94305, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] Received: 23 March 2012; in revised form: 28 March 2012 / Accepted: 31 March 2012 / Published: 13 April 2012 Abstract: This paper has two central aims: First, to reappraise Isaiah Berlin‘s political thought in a historically contextualized way, and in particular: to pay attention to a central conceptual tensions which animates it between, on the one hand, his famous definition of liberalism as resting on a negative concept of liberty and, on the other, his defense of cultural nationalism in general and Zionism in particular. Second, to see what do we gain and what do we lose by dubbing his philosophy Jewish. The discussion will proceed as follows: after describing the conceptual tension (Section 1), I will examine Berlin‘s discussion of nationalism and explain why comparisons between him and Hans Kohn as well as communitarian interpretations of him are incomplete and have limited merit. I will continue with a brief discussion of Berlin‘s Jewishness and Zionism (Section 3) and explain why I define this position ―Diaspora Zionism‖. The two concluding sections will discuss Berlin‘s place within a larger Cold War liberal discourse (Section 5) and why I find it problematic to see his political writings as part of a Jewish political tradition (Section 6).
    [Show full text]
  • 02-Vicent, Steven
    BENJAMIN CONSTANT AND CONSTITUTIONALISM K. Steven Vincent North Carolina State University SUMMARY: I. THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT .- II. POLITICAL SOVEREIGNTY AND THE PROTECTION OF RIGHTS.- III. POLITICAL INTERCHANGE, NEGOTIATION, AND COMPROMISE.- IV. RELIGIOUS TOLERATION.- V. THE DANGER OF FANATICISM.- VI. ANCIENT VERSUS MODERN LIBERTY.- VII. PLURALISM Abstract: Benjamin Constant (1767-1830) was one of the most famous liberal politicians and writers of the Bourbon Restoration in France (1814-1830). In 1814 and 1815, he wrote a number of notable works on constitutionalism. This article places these writings in their historical context, and summarizes Constant’s liberal pluralist constitutional philosophy. Constant insisted on the protection of rights, on a representative system of politics based on popular sovereignty, on the separation and balance of power, and on religious toleration. He worried about the destabilizing effects of “fanaticism,” and argued that a liberal constitutional regime would not endure unless citizens embraced a politics that permitted contestation, negotiation, and compromise. Keywords: Benjamin Constant, constitutionalism, liberalism, Boubon Restoration Benjamin Constant (1767-1830) was one of the most famous liberal politicians of the Bourbon Restoration (1814-1830), serving in the Chamber of Deputies 1819- 1822 and 1824-1830. He participated frequently in the debates that took place on the floor of the Chamber,1 devoted his considerable energy to organizational activities of the Liberal Opposition,2 and wrote hundreds of journal articles.3 He referred to politics as his “vocation” and clearly enjoyed his public role.4 1 Discours de M. Benjamin Constant à la Chambre des Députés, 2 t. (Paris: Ambroise Dupont et Compagnie, 1827 et 1828).
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy, Communism and the Individual
    The Isaiah Berlin Virtual Library DEMOCRACY, COMMUNISM AND THE INDIVIDUAL I THE ROOT of both democracy and Communism in eighteenth- century rationalism. Belief that all questions, including those of morals and politics, can be answered with absolute certainty, like those of science and mathematics, by correct use of reason or correct observation of nature. Rousseau formulates the basic proposition of Communism, Fascism and all other totalitarian orders, namely that if one is sure that one has the correct solution to the questions ‘How should men live?’ and ‘How should society be organised?’ one can, in the name of reason, impose it ruthlessly on others, since if they are rational they will agree freely; if they do not agree, they are not rational. This denies that different ideals of life, not necessarily altogether reconcilable with each other, are equally valid and equally worthy. II In the eighteenth century men believed that it was rational to seek liberty, equality and fraternity. Mr Stephen said that these were three beautiful but incompatible ideals. The belief that equality and liberty, however unlimited, are compatible is the basis of all anarchist theories, and liberalism is merely a watered-down version of this. But we now know that liberty, if not restrained, leads to inequality, and equality, if rigidly carried through, must lead to loss of liberty. This is the lesson of the nineteenth century, of which Communism denies the truth. III Doctrines divide into those which idealise liberty and those which idealise equality. The pro-liberty school wishes to leave the State as little power as possible, the equality school as much as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy of the State
    ANATOMY OF THE STATE ANATOMY OF THE STATE MURRAY N. ROTHBARD © 2009 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute and published under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Ludwig von Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832 www.mises.org ISBN: 978-1-933550-48-0 The greatest danger to the State is independent intellectual criticism. Murray N. Rothbard CONTENTS What the State Is Not . .9 What the State Is . 13 How the State Preserves Itself . 18 How the State Transcends Its Limits . 30 What the State Fears . 44 How States Relate to One Another . 47 History as a Race Between State Power and Social Power . 53 Index . 56 7 WHAT THE STATE IS NOT he State is almost universally consid- ered an institution of social service. Some theorists venerate the State as the apotheosis of society; oth- T ers regard it as an amiable, though often inefficient, organization for achieving social ends; but almost all regard it as a necessary means for achieving the goals of mankind, a means to be ranged against the “pri- vate sector” and often winning in this compe- tition of resources. With the rise of democracy, the identification of the State with society has been redoubled, until it is common to hear sen- timents expressed which violate virtually every tenet of reason and common sense such as, “we Originally published in “Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays” by Murray N. Rothbard (Auburn, Ala.: Mises Institute, 2000 [1974]), pp. 55–88. 9 10 ANATOMY OF THE STATE are the government.” The useful collective term “we” has enabled an ideological camouflage to be thrown over the reality of political life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impossibility of the Happiness Pill Bentham, Mill, and Isaiah Berlin On
    1 The Impossibility of the Happiness Pill Bentham, Mill, and Isaiah Berlin on Determinism and Liberal Neutrality Gianfranco Pellegrino Bentham Project (UCL) [email protected] (Very early draft. Please, don't quote.) ABSTRACT. Isaiah Berlin once claimed that Bentham and James Mill might have considered the use of “techniques of subliminal suggestion or other means of conditioning human beings.” In this paper I argue that Berlin’s provocative suggestion is quite misplaced since Bentham wouldn’t have given such medical treatment, even if it were possible, as many passages of his most known texts make clear. In the context of his criticism of moral sense theories, Bentham claimed that there is no stable connection between motives and actions, because the same sort of motives could lead to different actions, depending on the sensibilities of the agent. This view of motives and their connection with actions makes empirically impossible the nightmare of an illiberal mass treatment with medicines: if there are no stable connections between motives and actions, it is impossible for any medicine to have uniform effects over persons. Bentham’s skeptical arguments provide strong foundations to a liberal view of the limits and the legitimacy of government intervention. Bentham endorsed the well-known ‘best judge argument’ in favor of non-interference, providing a distinctive and novel foundation to it. 1. Manipulative Utilitarianism: Berlin on Bentham and Mill According to a common view, the following argument hold true: The manipulation argument For utilitarianism, an action is right if and only if it is conducive to the greatest happiness of the greatest number.
    [Show full text]