Water Efficiency in New Developments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Efficiency in New Developments www.water-efficient-buildings.org.uk Water efficiency in new developments: A best practice guide Acknowledgments Contact us Waterwise East would like to thank the project group for Please direct questions and comments to the website www.water-efficient-buildings.org.uk on which [email protected] this guide is based. Their work has enabled this guide to or phone +44 (0)845 257 1667. be put together. The project group included representatives from Waterwise East, Anglian Water, BRE, ECD Architects, Copyright and disclaimer GROHE, Carron Phoenix and Essex and Suffolk Water. Effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the content of this report, as well as the reliability of the analyses We are also very grateful to the sponsors of the site: the presented. Waterwise accept no liability for any actions East of England Development Agency, the Environment taken on the basis of the contents of this report. Agency (Anglian Region), Anglian Water and Cambridge Water Company for their continued support. © Copyright 2010 The Waterwise Project. All rights reserved. Authorship This guide was written by Clare Watters, Waterwise East Co-Ordinator and builds on previous work by her predeces- sor Andrew Pitt and the website project group. There was input from Jacob Tompkins, Managing Director of Waterwise and Victoria Higgins, Waterwise Communications Executive, who edited this guide. 1 Queen Anne’s Gate London SW1H 9BT About us United Kingdom Waterwise is an independent, not-for-profit, nongovern- T: +44 (0)207 344 1882 mental organisation focused on decreasing water con- E: [email protected] sumption in the UK, and on building the evidence base for large-scale water efficiency. Our aim is to reverse the www.water-efficient-buildings.org.uk upward trend in how much water we all use at home and www.waterwise.org.uk at work. We are developing a framework supported by a robust social, economic and environmental evidence base to Published April 2010 demonstrate the benefits of water efficiency. To achieve our aims we work with water companies, governments, manu- facturers, retailers, non-governmental organisations, regu- lators, academics, agricultural groups, businesses, domestic consumers, the media and other stakeholders. We conduct our own research and also undertake work as consultants. Waterwise East is the regional centre of excellence for water efficiency in the East of England. It aims to reduce water wastage in the region and is primarily focused on develop- ment and the built environment. We support the delivery water-efficient developments by working with develop- ers, planners, housing associations, local authorities and other water stakeholders to improve their water efficiency knowledge and encourage sharing of best practice. We also work with other water stakeholders encouraging them to uptake and promote water efficiency. Contents Introduction 2 Regulation – government intentions and policy direction 3 Part G of the Building Regulations 3 The Code for Sustainable Homes 3 Water Efficiency Calculator 4 The cost of achieving water efficiency 6 Achieving Code levels 1 and 2 6 Achieving Code levels 3 and 4 6 Achieving Code levels 5 and 6 6 Householder savings 6 Energy and carbon savings 6 Home buyer and public attitudes to water-efficient products 7 Waterwise East and Savills research, 2009 7 Strategies for whole-building specification 8 Fittings-based strategies 8 Recycling-based strategies 8 Bathroom manufacturers 8 Fittings and appliances 9 WCs 9 Showers 9 Baths 10 Taps 10 Washing machines 10 Dishwashers 10 Water softeners and conditioners 11 Waste disposal units 11 Water recycling systems 11 Greywater recycling systems 12 Rainwater recycling systems 12 Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) 13 Outdoor water use 14 Water pressure and design considerations 15 Water pressure 15 Implications of boilers and water recycling on water pressure 15 Plumbing system design –efficiency considerations 15 Developer interaction with water companies 16 Contact details 16 Case studies 17 Introduction In the past three years, over 10,000 new homes www.water-efficient-buildings.org.uk was launched by have already been built to improved water efficiency Waterwise East in June 2009. This contained “The Design standards in the East of England with the support of Guide for Developers” which is useful for developers and Waterwise. This leaflet explains some of the consider- housing associations building to any Code level with its ations needed when building a water-efficient home associated water efficiency requirement. This leaflet sum- or development. marises current best practice for those wishing to build new water-efficient developments. Despite having a seemingly wet climate, parts of the UK are experiencing water shortages, with some areas in England www.water-efficient-buildings.org.uk provides a valuable having less water available per person than Sudan and Syria. source of information about costs and benefits of water- Water efficiency is vital to accommodate new developments efficient new development, as well as advice on the speci- while protecting our rivers, wetlands, lakes and broads. Up fication and delivery of water-efficient developments. It is until 2030 the overall picture in the UK is one of ever-in- therefore relevant to policy and decision makers, for example creasing demand for an ever scarcer resource, and less water helping deliver the government’s Future Water ambition of will need to go further. 130 litres per person per day by 2030, and to make all homes zero carbon by 2050. The government is driving a sustainable development programme that mandates improved water efficiency in This guide will assist developers, facility managers and the built environment, including the Code for Sustainable landlords to improve the water efficiency of new dwellings. Homes (Code) and Part G of the Building Regulations. In addition, improved water efficiency in new development will be supported through the planning system. Disclaimer Many elements of this guide are susceptible to change, particularly those depending on policy and regulation. This document uses information that was correct as of March 2010. All the information in this guide and more detailed, up-to-date information is available from www.waterefficientbuildings.org.uk 2 Water efficiency in new developments – a best practice guide Regulation – government intentions and policy direction Against a backdrop of climate change, energy supply The Code for Sustainable Homes security and the need for more housing, the govern- The Code is the government’s main tool for improving the ment has outlined its strategy to improve the environ- environmental specification of new homes. All new homes mental performance of the built environment. In terms are required to be assessed against the Code, with a Code of new dwellings the following standards are driving or nil-rated certificate included in the Home Information water efficiency: Pack. All new homes built with public money must meet at least Code level 3 from April 2008. The Code is also the Part G of the Building Regulations national standard most often used by the planning system The government updated Part G of the Building Regulations to mandate water efficiency for new housing developments in April 2010. This revision sets a whole-building standard of in their area. 125 litres per person per day for domestic dwellings, com- prising internal water use of 120 litres per person per day There are seven Code levels ranging from level 0 (Building (in line with Code levels 1 and 2), plus an allowance of five Regulations) to level 6 (zero carbon). To achieve the Code litres per person per day for outdoor water use. This is to levels, points are awarded for achieving set standards in be specified using the methodology set out in “The Water nine different aspects of development. Water consump- Efficiency Calculator for New Dwellings” also used for the tion inside the home is one of the compulsory aspects of Code (see pages 4 and 5 for more information on the cal- the Code and up to five credits are available for perfor- culation). mance which reduces the amount of potable water used in the dwelling. The water consumption specification for increasing Code levels are: Table 1: Per capita daily water consumption specification of the Code for Sustainable Homes category WAT1 (CLG 2009)1 Water consumption Credits Mandatory Levels (litres/person/day) 120 l/p/day 1 Levels 1 and 2 110 l/p/day 2 105 l/p/day 3 Levels 3 and 4 90 l/p/day 4 80 l/p/day 5 Levels 5 and 6 Default Cases None Daily per capita consumption (PCC) of water is calculated using the Water Calculator (see overleaf) The Technical Guide for the Code is available from www.water-efficient-buildings.org.uk 1 Communities and local government, “Code for Sustainable Homes Technical guide May 2009 Version 2”, 2009, www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/code_for_sustainable_homes_techguide.pdf Water efficiency in new developments – a best practice guide 3 Water Efficiency Calculator Multiple fittings The Water Efficiency Calculator for New Dwellings (Water Where two or more of the same appliances are installed Calculator) is the government’s national calculation method which have different water consumption rates, the average for the assessment of water efficiency in new dwellings. flow rate/volume should be calculated, along with a pro- The calculator assesses the contribution that each internal portionate (also referred to as “weighted”) average of water fitting (micro-component) has on whole-house the highest consuming fitting (proportionate average is water consumption. calculated by taking the flow rate/volume and multiply- ing by 0.7). Where the proportionate average is higher The Water Calculator requires figures for water consumption, than the average, the proportionate average must be which should be provided in manufacturers’ product details. used in the Water Calculator (see Table 2 for an example Where product consumption is dependent on flow rates (for multiple fitting calculator for taps).
Recommended publications
  • Sellafield What to Do in a Radiation Emergency Booklet
    WHAT TO DO IN AN Emergency At Sellafield This information is prepared for everyone within the Detailed Emergency Planning Zone and the Inner Emergency Planning Zone for the Sellafield Site. EMERGENCY INFORMATION Listen to local radio. Monitor social media platforms. Dial the Sellafield Emergency Information Line on 29th September 2021 It is important that you study this booklet carefully and keep it in a safe and prominent place. WHAT TO DO IN AN EMERGENCY Introduction • This booklet gives advice on what to do in the event of an emergency at the Sellafield Site. • Sellafield is Europe’s largest single nuclear site and stores and handles industrial size quantities of radioactive material. Although unlikely, an emergency could occur involving material being stored and processed on the Site. In addition, Sellafield also holds a large inventory of other hazardous substances and again although unlikely an emergency could occur involving the chemicals being utilised on the Site. • It must be stressed that the possibility of such emergencies occurring is remote and that the design and operation of all plants on the site are independently monitored by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and Environment Agency (EA). • Current assessments of the radiological hazards indicate that areas between 6.1km & 8km from the centre of the Sellafield Site could be the most likely areas to be directly affected during and following a radiation emergency, this area is referred to as the Detailed Emergency Planning Zone (DEPZ). To see its geographical extent please see map A (pg13) & C (pg20). • In addition, other assessments of the chemical hazards indicate that an area up to 2km from the centre of the Sellafield Site could be the most likely area to be directly affected during and following a chemical emergency, this area is referred to as the Inner Emergency Planning Zone (IEPZ).
    [Show full text]
  • CLITHEROE ROAD, WHALLEY Utilities Study Commercial Estates Group 31/01/2013 Revised: 08/02/2013
    CLITHEROE ROAD, WHALLEY Utilities Study Commercial Estates Group 31/01/2013 Revised: 08/02/2013 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks DRAFT DRAFT Date 31/01/2013 08/02/2013 Prepared by C Scott C Scott Signature Checked by C Cozens C Cozens Signature Authorised by C Cozens C Cozens Signature Project number 50600485 50600485 File reference S:\50600485 - Clitheroe Road, S:\50600485 - Clitheroe Whalley\C Road, Whalley\C Documents\Reports\Working\ Documents\Reports\Working 2013 Utilities Study \2013 Utilities Study S:\50600485 - Clitheroe Road, Whalley\C Documents\Reports\Working\2013 Utilities Study Project number: 50600485 Dated: 31/01/2013 2 Revised: 08/02/2013 CLITHEROE ROAD, WHALLEY Utilities Study 31/01/2013 Client Commercial Estates Group Consultant WSP UK Limited Three White Rose Office Park Leeds LS11 0DL UK Tel: +44 (0)11 3395 6200 Fax: +44 (0)11 3395 6201 www.wspgroup.co.uk Registered Address WSP UK Limited 01383511 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ............................................................................... 6 2 Existing Site .............................................................................. 7 3 Water Supply ............................................................................ 8 4 Gas Supply ............................................................................. 13 5 Electricity Supply ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Core Documents List
    6/6/2018 UNITED UTILITIES WATER LIMITED (ECCLES WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2016 CORE DOCUMENTS LIST The Order CD/CPO/1 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 CD/CPO/2 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Key Plan for Order Map CD/CPO/2.1 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 1 CD/CPO/2.2 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 1A CD/CPO/2.3 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 1B CD/CPO/2.4 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 1C CD/CPO/2.5 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 2 CD/CPO/2.6 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 3 CD/CPO/3 UU - Statement of Reasons CD/CPO/4 Minutes of United Utilities Water Limited's Board meeting extract on 21 July 2016 CD/CPO/5 Objection dated 18 November 2016 on behalf of Standard Life Trustee Company Limited CD/CPO/6 Objection dated 20 October 2016 on behalf of MSCCL, PINL, SCPL, CoSCoS and PSLL CD/CPO/7 Statement of Case on behalf of the acquiring authority (1 November
    [Show full text]
  • Constituents & Weights
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 100 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.59 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 3.7 UNITED RELX 1.88 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Admiral Group 0.35 UNITED Glencore 1.97 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.49 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 1.86 UNITED Halma 0.54 UNITED Rightmove 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.26 UNITED Hargreaves Lansdown 0.32 UNITED Rio Tinto 3.41 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashtead Group 1.26 UNITED Hikma Pharmaceuticals 0.22 UNITED Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.41 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 4.5 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 3.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 6.02 UNITED Imperial Brands 0.77 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 2.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Auto Trader Group 0.32 UNITED Informa 0.4 UNITED Royal Mail 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Avast 0.14 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.46 UNITED Sage Group 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aveva Group 0.23 UNITED Intermediate Capital Group 0.31 UNITED Sainsbury (J) 0.24 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 0.84 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.34 UNITED Schroders 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM B&M European Value Retail 0.27 UNITED Intertek Group 0.47 UNITED Scottish Mortgage Inv Tst 1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BAE Systems 0.89 UNITED ITV 0.25 UNITED Segro 0.69 UNITED KINGDOM
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Publications
    2 FTSE Russell Publications FTSE 100 Semi Annual Equally 19 August 2021 Weighted Net Tax Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.95 UNITED Fresnillo 0.86 UNITED Prudential 0.92 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Admiral Group 1.06 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 1.08 UNITED Reckitt Benckiser Group 1.02 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 0.91 UNITED Glencore 0.94 UNITED RELX 1.05 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.91 UNITED Halma 1.05 UNITED Rentokil Initial 1.04 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashtead Group 1.04 UNITED Hargreaves Lansdown 0.98 UNITED Rightmove 1.09 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.96 UNITED Hikma Pharmaceuticals 1.03 UNITED Rio Tinto 0.96 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 1.11 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 0.94 UNITED Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.9 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Auto Trader Group 1.15 UNITED Imperial Brands 0.98 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 0.56 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Avast 1.07 UNITED Informa 0.94 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 0.49 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aveva Group 1.08 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.97 UNITED Royal Mail 0.99 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 1 UNITED Intermediate Capital Group 0.99 UNITED Sage Group 1.06 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM B&M European Value Retail 1.04 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.85 UNITED Sainsbury (J) 1.03 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM BAE Systems 1 UNITED Intertek
    [Show full text]
  • Ceca Pipeline
    CECA North West: Infrastructure Vision A project map for contractors setting out the infrastructure pipeline to 2017 Contents 01 CONTENTS 02 INTRODUCTION 03 nortH west - nationaL inFrastructure PLan 08 LocaL autHorities 12 nationaL ParK autHorities 12 coMBined autHorities 14 LEPS 14 transPort 14 Ports 15 roads 16 raiL 17 aviation 17 deFence 18 oiL & Gas 19 eLectricitY coMPanies & renewaBLes 22 nucLear 23 water 23 EnvironMent 23 BroadBand 24 ceca contact addresses 01 Introduction of Moorside nuclear power station, as well as a new civil engineering framework for Greater Manchester. Given the many and complex routes to market, however, it is important than ever that CECA’s members have easy access to the information they need to take advantage of the opportunities that arise. Moreover, with increased workloads, clients need the region’s SMEs, as well as major contractors, to be equipped to meet their aspirations. The information in what follows is aimed at enabling smaller firms to identify workstreams where their specialist expertise and local workforce can bring real value. This publication has been prepared by CECA to help our members win work in the North West. Since 2010, the Government has sought to rebalance the nation’s economy Guy Lawson FCIM, MIED, Director, by focussing on the renewal of regional infrastructure. CECA North West CECA’s research has found that for each 1,000 jobs that are directly created in infrastructure construction, employment In the North West, the Civil Engineering Contractors’ as a whole rises by 3,053 jobs. Furthermore, every £1 billion Association (CECA) covers the five Local Enterprise of infrastructure construction increases overall economic Partnership (LEP) areas of Cheshire & Warrington, Cumbria, activity by £2.842 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake District Gas Pipe Move Planned to Minimise Disruption
    Investors Home Press Releases Media Contacts Home / Press Releases / Lake District gas pipe move planned to minimise disruption National Grid Gas Distribution is moving its pipes to support a project to improve water quality in England's largest natural lake 28 Apr 2017 A six-month scheme to move gas pipes running under the A592, next to Lake Windermere, starts Monday 8 May, with bosses keen to stress that the area remains ‘open’ at all times. National Grid Gas Distribution must move its pipes so that United Utilities can continue its bigger scheme to install a new wastewater pipeline, to improve water quality in England’s largest natural lake. The gas pipes beneath the A592 are exactly where United Utilities needs its new pipe to be, so the gas network has agreed to move its pipes to the other side of the road. National Grid Gas Distribution can only do this work when United Utilities is clear of the area. It therefore has a window between 8 May and 31 October, when the water company returns to start phase two of its three-phase scheme. Traffic lights will be in place as gas teams work in stretches of up to 200m of the road, at any one time. They will start just after the entrance to Storrs Hall Hotel on 8 May and, once that area is completed, will begin moving north. They will finish at Ferry Nab in October. To keep vehicles moving, the lights have in-built technology that constantly monitor and adapt to traffic. There is also the option to manually control the lights at busy periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Aggreko’S Current Hold Valuation As a Moderately Assign I Share, Recommendation Per to Aggreko
    Equity Research Aggreko Plc Industrials | European Business Services A Case To Continue Holding the Market Leader 08 February 2021 in Temporary Power Solutions Stock Rating Hold Even after the takeover offer re-pricing, I believe Aggreko’s Industry View valuation does not reflect the full extent of growth Positive opportunities in a recovery environment Price Target GBp 964 Under-appreciated positioning amid the energy transition: The acceleration of various themes, such as de-carbonisation, has the potential to magnify dislocations in certain regions and sectors. Providing scope for above-market rates of growth as temporary power providers are engaged to act as a bridging mechanism for Price (as of 08/02/2021) GBp 851 economies and sectors transitioning away from their legacy power infrastructure. Additionally, though unpredictable, I like the added kicker of large one-off events Potential Upside/Downside +13.2% and believe Aggreko’s scale continues to act as an economic moat for these types of Tickers AGK.LN / AGGK.L contracts. Forecasts: Following management’s Nov-20 strategic update, I forecast a recovery in underlying performance to take place in 2021. This is of course predicated on a Enterprise Value (mGBP) 2,679 gradual easing of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions throughout 2021, which is subject Market Cap (mGBP) 2,180 to the effectiveness of global vaccination roll-outs and government lockdown policies. Shares Outstanding (m) 256 My base case estimates a 8.2% growth in underlying revenue, net of pass-through fuel, for 2021 and further acceleration in 2022 as economic conditions continue Free Float (%) 99% normalise, specifically the events business.
    [Show full text]
  • Cboe UK Utilities Sector Index BUKUTL
    Cboe UK Utilities Sector Index BUKUTL Page 1 August 2021 Cboe Exchange This sector represents gas, electricity, and water services delivered directly to residential and commercial users. The parent index is the Cboe UK All Companies (BUKAC). The index base level is 10,000 as of December 31st, 2010. This is a price return index. Objective The index is designed for use in the creation of index tracking funds, derivatives and as a performance benchmark. Investability Liquidity Transparency Availability Stocks are selected and Stocks are screened to Uses a transparent, rules-based Calculation is based on weighted to ensure that the ensure that the index is construction process. Index price and total return index is investable. tradable. Rules are freely available on the methodologies, both real cboe.com/europe/indices -time, intra-second and website. end of day. Statistics Index ISIN Ticker RIC Currency Cboe UK Utilities Sector DE000SLA1730 BUKUTL .BUKUTL GBP Cboe UK Utilities Sector - net DE000SLA18M1 BUKUTLN .BUKUTLN GBP Volatility Volatility (1y) 0.1733 Returns(%) 1M 3M 6M YTD 1Y 3Y 5Y BUKUTL 4.13 2.66 18.19 10.42 17.9 11.27 -14.36 BUKUTLN 4.18 5.68 22.02 14.45 23.8 31.48 12.51 Top 5 Performers Country 1 month return % CENTRICA PLC UNITED KINGDOM 14.06 SSE PLC UNITED KINGDOM 12.64 DRAX GROUP PLC UNITED KINGDOM 2.28 NATIONAL GRID PLC UNITED KINGDOM 1.91 TELECOM PLUS PLC UNITED KINGDOM 0.39 Historical Performance Chart 40% 20% 0% 2011 2013 2014 2016 2017 2018 2020 2021 Cboe UK Utilities Sector (GBP) Cboe UK All Companies (GBP) Cboe.com | ©Cboe | /CboeGlobalMarkets | /company/cboe © 2021 Cboe Exchange, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • New Connections and Developer Services Charges Scheme 2019/2021 Page 1 of 64
    New connections and developer services charges scheme 2019/2021 Page 1 of 64 Charges schemes United Utilities Water Limited has published four charges schemes for 2020/2021 charging year. They include the charges to be paid for services provided by us in the course of carrying out our function as a water and sewerage undertaker. Below are details of all the schemes published by us. This scheme is – New connections and developer services charges scheme This charges scheme sets out the charging policies and the charges for the year commencing 1 April 2020, for water supply and sewerage connections and developer services The others are Wholesale water charges scheme This charges scheme sets out the charging policies and the charges for the year commencing 1 April 2020 for wholesale water services Wholesale sewerage charges scheme This charges scheme sets out the charging policies and the charges for the year commencing 1 April 2020 for wholesale sewerage services Household charges scheme This charges scheme sets out the charging policies and the charges for the year commencing 1 April 2020, chargeable to household customers All of the charges schemes shown above, and our Charges statement for New Appointments & Variations are available to download from our website: unitedutilities.com New connections and developer services charges scheme 2020/2021 Page 2 of 93 United Utilities Water Limited – regional map New connections and developer services charges scheme 2020/2021 Page 3 of 93 Contents Scope of this charges scheme ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United Utilities Group
    UNITED UTILITIES GROUP PLC GROUP UTILITIES UNITED United Utilities Group PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2019 MARCH 31 ENDED YEAR THE FOR STATEMENTS FINANCIAL AND REPORT ANNUAL Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2019 Cover photo: The cycle of our water and wastewater services, much of which are designed to use gravity to move the water naturally in the most efficient way United Utilities Strategic.indd 3 31/05/2019 18:48:32 Job Number 31 May 2019 6:47 pm Proof Number Job Number 31 May 2019 6:47 pm Proof Number Job Number 31 May 2019 6:47 pm Proof Number Cover photo: The cycle of our water and wastewater services, much of which are designed to use gravity to move the water naturally in the most efficient way Job Number 31 May 2019 6:47 pm Proof Number United Utilities Strategic.indd 4 31/05/2019 18:48:34 ww Contents Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s review 0 4 2018/19 highlights 0 8 Strategic report What we do 1 2 Our purpose and strategy 1 5 Our marketplace 1 6 Our competitive advantages 1 7 Our economic regulation 1 8 Our business plan submission for 2020–25 1 9 Our business model 2 4 How we create value for stakeholders 3 9 Our planning horizons 4 8 How we measure our performance 5 1 Our performance in 2018/19 5 6 Our risk management 6 8 Governance Corporate governance report Board of directors 8 0 Letter from the Chairman 8 4 Nomination committee report 9 4 Audit committee report 1 0 3 Corporate responsibility committee report 1 1 2 Remuneration committee report
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Protecting Shareholder and Natural Value
    Protecting shareholder and natural value Biodiversity risk management: towards best practice for extractive and utility companies COVER PAGE WITH IMAGE BACKD HERERA OFTNCE DRAFT CONSOLIDATED 1 This report and the benchmark upon which it is based were designed and written by Annelisa Grigg, Director of the independent consultancy Global Balance, and by Kerry ten Kate, Director, Investor Responsibility, Insight Investment. Acknowledgements The analysis for this survey was greatly assisted by the collaboration of the companies benchmarked, in its design and in checking and supplementing the data used. We greatly appreciate their input and hope that this report and our engagement with them on the basis of their individual results will help them manage biodiversity risks and opportunities to the advantage of the company and of biodiversity. Many thanks also to Assheton Carter of Conservation International; Sally Johnson, Independent Consultant; Mike Kelly, KPMG and to Rachel Crossley, Craig MacKenzie and Rory Sullivan of Insight Investment for their comments on initial drafts of this report. The authors have made their best efforts to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this report and apologise for any inadvertent errors. 2 Contents Executive summary 4 Section 1. Introduction 10 Section 2. Is biodiversity an issue for business? 11 Section 3. Methodology 14 Section 4. How Insight will use this report 15 Section 5. The benchmark results 16 Section 6. Conclusions and recommendations 35 Appendix 1: Methodology 43 Appendix 2: Benchmark
    [Show full text]