Trust Us the Global Reporters 2002 Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 02 Trust Us Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trust Us the Global Reporters 2002 Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 02 Trust Us Executive Summary SustainAbility Trust Us The Global Reporters 2002 Survey of Corporate Sustainability Reporting 02 Trust Us Executive Summary Corporate accountability gained new The Carpet Bombing Syndrome Executive urgency in 2002. Following scandals in the The average page-length of printed reports United States, Europe and Asia, companies has soared 45% in just two years – with no Summary increasingly have felt demand from associated increase in overall report quality. stakeholders to account more fully for their Some reporters seem to be bombarding actions – through, among other things, report users with facts, with little or no increased transparency and reporting. thought for significance and materiality. Trust Us, which summarizes the findings GRI Guidelines Raise the Bar of the 2002 Global Reporters survey, aims The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) to identify and classify best practice in sustainability reporting guidelines have corporate accountability across the triple allowed first-time reporters to enter at a bottom line (TBL) of sustainable much more sophisticated level of reporting development. The spotlight is on 100 than previously possible. A key question: sustainability and corporate social how does this quality of disclosure relate responsibility (CSR) reports from around to quality of performance? the world, with the Top 50 subjected to an in-depth benchmarking. In addition, The Magnificent Seven we analyze current reporting across Seven companies scored over 50% in the industry clusters and in terms of 2002 survey: The Co-operative Bank, Novo emerging ‘hot topics’. Nordisk, BAA, BT, Rio Tinto, Royal Dutch / Shell Group and BP. The newcomer to the As trust in capitalism and in companies highest-scoring bracket since the 2000 has hit new lows, CSR and sustainability survey is Rio Tinto. Interestingly, there are reporting potentially offers real no non-European companies among the opportunities for companies to rebuild that Magnificent Seven, although Bristol-Myers trust. Key to this, however, will be three Squibb from the USA, South African necessary conditions for rebuilding trust: Breweries from South Africa and WMC from Australia are in hot pursuit. Materiality Intelligent identification of the issues North America Leads – Just that matter most for measurement, Overall, average scores across the regions management and reporting remain relatively static, although in 2002 the North American reports (45%) overtook Governance the Europeans (43%). Non-OECD reporters New frameworks for corporate decision- (41%) and Other OECD reporters (40%) making, including improved board follow very close behind. recruitment, structures and processes GRI Signatories Excel Brands There is a substantial difference between Closer links between key areas of reports based on the GRI guidelines and corporate accountability and company others. On average, GRI reports scored 8% and product identity and communication. higher than their non-GRI counterparts, with the most significant difference in scores at the bottom end of the Top 50 — Key Conclusions a 17% difference between the lowest scoring GRI report and the lowest scoring Transparency’s Glass Ceiling non-GRI report. Best practice in corporate sustainability reporting appears to be hitting a plateau, All in the Mix with scores virtually unchanged since 2000. The scoring profile across the major areas of 01 A term used by SustainAbility Faculty our assessment methodology has remained member Jed Emerson to describe value Social and Economic Issues on the Rise largely the same since the 2000 survey, with added across several dimensions of the Social issues, and to a lesser extent wider strong performance from all the Top 50 triple bottom line. economic issues, are making a noticeably reports in the Context and Commitments stronger showing in the latest company (48%), and Management Quality (42%). reporting — alongside a corresponding The Royal Dutch / Shell Group report tops (and potentially worrying) drop in emphasis the league in Context and Commitments on environmental dimensions. with 80%, while BT leads on Management Quality (69%). Trust Us 03 Executive Summary The area of greatest change is in the Economic Bottom Line The Top 50 Companies balance of reporting. The early emphasis Beyond financial accounting, what on environmental performance has shifted economic information do we want? Rank Company Score % towards greater reporting on social and ethical material, at the expense of the Brand & Reputation 1 The Co-operative Bank 120 61 environmental dimension. While How does — and how should — reporting 2 Novo Nordisk 118 60 environmental reporting has gone down link to corporate and brand reputation 9%, reporting on social performance has and value? 3 BAA 116 59 increased by a dramatic 24%. BT leads 4 BT Group 114 58 with 67%, followed closely by newcomer Governance 5 Rio Tinto 107 55 Chiquita and veteran reporter Royal Dutch What are the appropriate roles for boards 6 Royal Dutch / Shell Group 104 53 / Shell Group (58% respectively). and top executives? 7 BP 103 53 Economic reporting remains the weakest 8 Bristol-Myers Squibb 96 49 aspect of performance reporting, although Breaking Transparency’s Glass Ceiling 9 ITT Flygt 95 48 bright spots of best practice are emerging. South African Breweries 95 48 BAA (71%) and South African Breweries The final section of the report focuses on BASF 95 48 (63%) lead the pack in this area. two significant new priorities: materiality 12 Volkswagen Group 94 48 and integration. WMC 94 48 14 CIS Co-operative 91 46 Clusters of Risk and Opportunity Materiality Insurance The soaring size of corporate reports — 15 Baxter International 89 45 In the 2002 survey, we examined results a trend also now found in mainstream 16 Cable & Wireless 88 45 in detail from eight clusters of companies financial reporting — underscores the need 17 Ricoh Japan 87 44 spanning a range of impacts and issues: for a new push in relation to the closely 18 Kirin Brewery 86 44 linked areas of issue identification and Chiquita Brands 85 43 Consumer Products materiality. The plateau in scores can only International Energy be overcome if companies provide better 20 United Utilities 83 42 Finance & Insurance evidence of how sustainability issues, 21 Suncor Energy 82 42 Food & Beverages management programs, and performance 22 BC Hydro 81 41 Heavy Industry trends are significant. But in the process, Eskom 81 41 IT & Telecommunications current definitions of materiality will need Matsushita Electric Group 81 41 Life Sciences to expand. Manaaki Whenua 81 41 Transport 26 British Airways 80 41 Integration SAS Group 80 41 Common issues cross-cut all eight clusters, That said, the most important challenges to 28 Alcan 79 40 including: climate change, business models, come will have less to do with questions of 29 General Motors 78 40 and governance how we report better, or govern companies better, and more to do with how reporting 30 Henkel 77 39 can help us use (and, where necessary, Kesko 77 39 Hot Topics change) market mechanisms to define, 31 Novartis International 76 39 develop and deliver sustainable business 32 Unilever 75 38 Section X examines and evaluates seven solutions. This will require a greater focus 34 RWE 73 37 current issues highlighted during the on four key areas of integration: Balance 35 Bayer 72 37 benchmarking process: Sheets, with a new focus on ‘blended 35 Deutsche Telekom 72 37 value’; 01 Boards, as they wrestle with the Procter & Gamble 72 37 Financial Markets new governance agendas; Brands, with Swiss Re 72 37 How are corporate reporters seeking to companies building new conversations with 39 Toyota Motor Corporation 71 36 engage the financial world? customers and consumers; and, as the need 40 BMW Group 70 36 for more radical solutions is increasingly 41 Tesco 69 35 Verification and Assurance recognized, Business Models. 42 AWG 68 35 The GRI will drive market demand, but Danone Group 68 35 how can real value be added? 44 Siemens 67 34 45 Aracruz Celulose 66 34 Supply Chains Sony Corporation 66 34 As value webs globalize, how can they be 47 TEPCO 64 33 made more transparent and accountable? 48 Suez 62 32 49 Credit Suisse Group 61 31 Emerging and Transition Economies Who is reporting on — and in — less 50 adidas-Salomon 57 29 developed regions? Figure 01.
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Annual General Meeting and Proxy Statement 2020 Annual Report
    2020 Annual Report and Proxyand Statement 2021 Annual General Meeting Meeting General Annual 2021 Transocean Ltd. • 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT • 2020 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT COMPENSATION REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS ABOUT TRANSOCEAN LTD. Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates one of the most versatile offshore drilling fleets in the world. Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in, and operates a fleet of 37 mobile offshore drilling units consisting of 27 ultra-deepwater floaters and 10 harsh environment floaters. In addition, Transocean is constructing two ultra-deepwater drillships. Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RIG. OUR GLOBAL MARKET PRESENCE Ultra-Deepwater 27 Harsh Environment 10 The symbols in the map above represent the company’s global market presence as of the February 12, 2021 Fleet Status Report. ABOUT THE COVER The front cover features two of our crewmembers onboard the Deepwater Conqueror in the Gulf of Mexico and was taken prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, our priorities remain keeping our employees, customers, contractors and their families healthy and safe, and delivering incident-free operations to our customers worldwide. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Any statements included in this Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding future market trends and results of operations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities law.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Inference of Related Trading Between Two Securities: Detecting Pairs Trading, Merger Arbitrage, and Strategy Rules*
    Empirical inference of related trading between two securities: Detecting pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and strategy rules* Keith Godfrey The University of Western Australia Working paper: 5 September 2013 The traditional approach to studying pairs trading is to simulate profitability using ex-post historical prices. I study the actual trades reported anonymously in security pairs and build statistical inferences of related trading. The approach is based on the time differences between trades. It can distinguish intrinsically related securities from pseudo-random sets, find stocks involved in merger arbitrage in massive sets of paired index constituents, and infer dominant trading rules of mean reversion algorithms. Empirical inference of related trading can enable further studies into pairs trading, strategy rules, merger arbitrage, and insider trading. Keywords: Inferred trading, empirical inference, pairs trading, merger arbitrage. JEL Classification Codes: G00, G10, C10, C40, C60 The availability of intraday trading or “tick” data with time resolution of a millisecond or finer is opening many avenues of research into financial markets. Analysis of two or more streams of tick data concurrently is becoming increasingly important in the study of multiple-security trading including index tracking, pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and market-neutral strategies. One of the greatest challenges in empirical trading research is the anonymity of reported trades. Securities exchanges report the dates, times, prices, and volumes traded, without identifying the traders. In studies of a single security, this introduces uncertainty of whether each market order that caused a trade was the buy or sell order, and there are documented approaches of inference such as Lee and Ready (1991).
    [Show full text]
  • To Arrive at the Total Scores, Each Company Is Marked out of 10 Across
    BRITAIN’S MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES THE RESULTS 17th last year as it continues to do well in the growing LNG business, especially in Australia and Brazil. Veteran chief executive Frank Chapman is due to step down in the new year, and in October a row about overstated reserves hit the share price. Some pundits To arrive at the total scores, each company is reckon BG could become a take over target as a result. The biggest climber in the top 10 this year is marked out of 10 across nine criteria, such as quality Petrofac, up to fifth from 68th last year. The oilfield of management, value as a long-term investment, services group may not be as well known as some, but it is doing great business all the same. Its boss, Syrian- financial soundness and capacity to innovate. Here born Ayman Asfari, is one of the growing band of are the top 10 firms by these individual measures wealthy foreign entrepreneurs who choose to make London their operating base and home, to the benefit of both the Exchequer and the employment figures. In fourth place is Rolls-Royce, one of BMAC’s most Financial value as a long-term community and environmental soundness investment responsibility consistent high performers. Hardly a year goes past that it does not feature in the upper reaches of our table, 1= Rightmove 9.00 1 Diageo 8.61 1 Co-operative Bank 8.00 and it has topped its sector – aero and defence engi- 1= Rotork 9.00 2 Berkeley Group 8.40 2 BASF (UK & Ireland) 7.61 neering – for a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • BP and Rio Tinto Plan Clean Coal Project for Western Australia I P
    BP and Rio Tinto Plan Clean Coal Project for Western Australia I p... http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=2012968&content... Site Index | Contact us | Reports and publications | BP worldwide | Home Search: Go About BP Environment and society Products and services Investors Press Careers BP Global Press Press releases Press releases BP and Rio Tinto Plan Clean Coal Project for Western Speeches Australia Features and news Images and graphics Release date: 21 May 2007 Contact Information In this section BP and Rio Tinto today announced that they are beginning feasibility studies and work on plans for the potential BP Takes Delivery of development of a A$2 billion (US$1.5 billion) coal-fired World's Largest LNG Carrier power generation project at Kwinana in Western Australia What is RSS? BP and D1 Oils Form Joint that would be fully integrated with carbon capture and Venture to Develop Jatropha storage to reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases. This Biodiesel Feedstock will be the first new project for Hydrogen Energy, the new BP Announces Significant company launched by BP and Rio Tinto last week, subject North Sea Investment to Boost to regulatory approval. The planned project would be an UK Gas Supplies industrial-scale coal-fired power and carbon capture and storage project. It would generate enough electricity to BP, ABF and DuPont Unveil $400 Million Investment in UK meet 15 per cent of the demand of south west Western Biofuels Australia, while each year capturing and permanently storing about four million tonnes of carbon dioxide which BP and TNK-BP Plan otherwise would have been emitted to the atmosphere.The Strategic Alliance with project would gasify locally-produced coal from the Collie Gazprom as TNK-BP Sells its region to produce hydrogen and carbon dioxide.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Carbon Pricing: Case Studies from Company Experience
    TECHNICAL NOTE 9 | JANUARY 2015 Preparing for Carbon Pricing Case Studies from Company Experience: Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Acknowledgments and Methodology This Technical Note was prepared for the PMR Secretariat by Janet Peace, Tim Juliani, Anthony Mansell, and Jason Ye (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions—C2ES), with input and supervision from Pierre Guigon and Sarah Moyer (PMR Secretariat). The note comprises case studies with three companies: Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). All three have operated in jurisdictions where carbon emissions are regulated. This note captures their experiences and lessons learned preparing for and operating under policies that price carbon emissions. The following information sources were used during the research for these case studies: 1. Interviews conducted between February and October 2014 with current and former employees who had first-hand knowledge of these companies’ activities related to preparing for and operating under carbon pricing regulation. 2. Publicly available resources, including corporate sustainability reports, annual reports, and Carbon Disclosure Project responses. 3. Internal company review of the draft case studies. 4. C2ES’s history of engagement with corporations on carbon pricing policies. Early insights from this research were presented at a business-government dialogue co-hosted by the PMR, the International Finance Corporation, and the Business-PMR of the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) in Cologne, Germany, in May 2014. Feedback from that event has also been incorporated into the final version. We would like to acknowledge experts at Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)—among whom Laurel Green, David Hone, Sue Lacey and Neil Marshman—for their collaboration and for sharing insights during the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • BP Plc Vs Royal Dutch Shell
    FEBRUARY 2021 BP plc Vs Royal Dutch Shell 01872 229 000 www.atlanticmarkets.co.uk www.atlanticmarkets.co.uk BP Plc A Brief History BP is a British multinational oil and gas company headquartered in London. It is one of the world’s oil and gas supermajors. · 1908. The founding of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, established as a subsidiary of Burmah Oil Company to take advantage of oil discoveries in Iran. · 1935. It became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company · 1954. Adopted the name British Petroleum. · 1959. The company expanded beyond the Middle East to Alaska and it was one of the first companies to strike oil in the North Sea. · 1978. British Petroleum acquired majority control of Standard Oil of Ohio. Formerly majority state-owned. · 1979–1987. The British government privatised the company in stages between. · 1998. British Petroleum merged with Amoco, becoming BP Amoco plc, · 2000-2001. Acquired ARCO and Burmah Castrol, becoming BP plc. · 2003–2013. BP was a partner in the TNK-BP joint venture in Russia. Positioning BP is a “vertically integrated” company, meaning it’s involved in the whole supply chain – from discovering oil, producing it, refining it, shipping it, trading it and selling it at the petrol pump. BP has operations in nearly 80 countries worldwide and has around 18,700 service stations worldwide. Its largest division is BP America. In Russia, BP also own a 19.75% stake in Rosneft, the world’s largest publicly traded oil and gas company by hydrocarbon reserves and production. BP has a primary listing on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Sellafield What to Do in a Radiation Emergency Booklet
    WHAT TO DO IN AN Emergency At Sellafield This information is prepared for everyone within the Detailed Emergency Planning Zone and the Inner Emergency Planning Zone for the Sellafield Site. EMERGENCY INFORMATION Listen to local radio. Monitor social media platforms. Dial the Sellafield Emergency Information Line on 29th September 2021 It is important that you study this booklet carefully and keep it in a safe and prominent place. WHAT TO DO IN AN EMERGENCY Introduction • This booklet gives advice on what to do in the event of an emergency at the Sellafield Site. • Sellafield is Europe’s largest single nuclear site and stores and handles industrial size quantities of radioactive material. Although unlikely, an emergency could occur involving material being stored and processed on the Site. In addition, Sellafield also holds a large inventory of other hazardous substances and again although unlikely an emergency could occur involving the chemicals being utilised on the Site. • It must be stressed that the possibility of such emergencies occurring is remote and that the design and operation of all plants on the site are independently monitored by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and Environment Agency (EA). • Current assessments of the radiological hazards indicate that areas between 6.1km & 8km from the centre of the Sellafield Site could be the most likely areas to be directly affected during and following a radiation emergency, this area is referred to as the Detailed Emergency Planning Zone (DEPZ). To see its geographical extent please see map A (pg13) & C (pg20). • In addition, other assessments of the chemical hazards indicate that an area up to 2km from the centre of the Sellafield Site could be the most likely area to be directly affected during and following a chemical emergency, this area is referred to as the Inner Emergency Planning Zone (IEPZ).
    [Show full text]
  • CLITHEROE ROAD, WHALLEY Utilities Study Commercial Estates Group 31/01/2013 Revised: 08/02/2013
    CLITHEROE ROAD, WHALLEY Utilities Study Commercial Estates Group 31/01/2013 Revised: 08/02/2013 Quality Management Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks DRAFT DRAFT Date 31/01/2013 08/02/2013 Prepared by C Scott C Scott Signature Checked by C Cozens C Cozens Signature Authorised by C Cozens C Cozens Signature Project number 50600485 50600485 File reference S:\50600485 - Clitheroe Road, S:\50600485 - Clitheroe Whalley\C Road, Whalley\C Documents\Reports\Working\ Documents\Reports\Working 2013 Utilities Study \2013 Utilities Study S:\50600485 - Clitheroe Road, Whalley\C Documents\Reports\Working\2013 Utilities Study Project number: 50600485 Dated: 31/01/2013 2 Revised: 08/02/2013 CLITHEROE ROAD, WHALLEY Utilities Study 31/01/2013 Client Commercial Estates Group Consultant WSP UK Limited Three White Rose Office Park Leeds LS11 0DL UK Tel: +44 (0)11 3395 6200 Fax: +44 (0)11 3395 6201 www.wspgroup.co.uk Registered Address WSP UK Limited 01383511 WSP House, 70 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1AF 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ............................................................................... 6 2 Existing Site .............................................................................. 7 3 Water Supply ............................................................................ 8 4 Gas Supply ............................................................................. 13 5 Electricity Supply ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas Jon Rozhon March 2012 Relevant • Independent • Objective Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas 1 Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands There has been a steady flow of foreign investment into the oil sands industry over the past decade in terms of merger and acquisition (M&A) activity. Out of a total CDN$61.5 billion in M&A’s, approximately half – or CDN$30.3 billion – involved foreign companies taking an ownership stake. These funds were invested in in situ projects, integrated projects, and land leases. As indicated in Figure 1, US and Chinese companies made the most concerted efforts to increase their profile in the oil sands, investing 2/3 of all foreign capital. The US and China both invested in a total of seven different projects. The French company, Total SA, has also spread its capital around several projects (four in total) while Royal Dutch Shell (UK), Statoil (Norway), and PTT (Thailand) each opted to take large positions in one project each. Table 1 provides a list of all foreign investments in the oil sands since 2004. Figure 1: Total Oil Sands Foreign Investment since 2003, Country of Origin Korea 1% Thailand Norway 6% UK 7% 2% US France 33% 18% China 33% Source: Canoils. Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas 2 Table 1: Oil Sands Foreign Investment Deals Year Country Acquirer Brief Description Total Acquisition Cost (000) 2012 China PetroChina 40% interest in MacKay River 680,000 project from AOSC 2011 China China National Offshore Acquisition of OPTI Canada 1,906,461 Oil Corporation 2010 France Total SA Alliance with Suncor.
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Tinto BHP, Tesco, Sainsbury, Arcelormittal, National Grid
    Quarterly Engagement Rio Tinto Report July-September BHP, Tesco, 2020 Sainsbury, ArcelorMittal, National Grid 2 LAPFF QUARTERLY ENGAGEMENT REPORT | JULY-SEPTEMBER 2020 lapfforum.org CLIMATE EMERGENCY Puutu Kunti Kurrama and Pinikura Aboriginal Corporation Rio Tinto under pressure from investors over Juukan Gorge As LAPFF has been learning more about “My interaction with Mr. Rio Tinto’s involvement in the destruc- Thompson, in his roles as Chair tion of the historically significant caves of both Rio Tinto and 3i, has been at Juukan Gorge in Western Australia, there have been increasing concerns positive thus far. However, I sense about the company’s corporate govern- that investors are losing confidence ance practices. Consequently, the Forum in his leadership and in his board at – along with other investor groups, most Rio Tinto. It will be a long road back What happened at prominently the Australasian Centre for for the company.” Juukan Gorge? Corporate Responsibility (ACCR) - has been pushing the company to review its Cllr Doug McMurdo In May, Rio Tinto destroyed 46,000-year- corporate governance arrangements. old Aboriginal caves in the Juukan One of the main strategies in this Gorge region of Western Australia. The engagement has been to issue press responding to information issued by explosions were part of a government releases citing LAPFF’s concerns as vari- Australian Parliamentary inquiries into sanctioned mining exploration in ous details of Rio Tinto’s practices were this matter. There appears to be increas- the region. The caves are of cultural revealed through a range of investiga- ing evidence of corporate governance fail- significance to the Puutu Kunti tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Core Documents List
    6/6/2018 UNITED UTILITIES WATER LIMITED (ECCLES WASTEWATER TREATMENT WORKS) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2016 CORE DOCUMENTS LIST The Order CD/CPO/1 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 CD/CPO/2 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Key Plan for Order Map CD/CPO/2.1 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 1 CD/CPO/2.2 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 1A CD/CPO/2.3 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 1B CD/CPO/2.4 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 1C CD/CPO/2.5 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 2 CD/CPO/2.6 The United Utilities Water Limited (Eccles Wastewater Treatment Works) Compulsory Purchase Order 2016 Order Map – Plan 3 CD/CPO/3 UU - Statement of Reasons CD/CPO/4 Minutes of United Utilities Water Limited's Board meeting extract on 21 July 2016 CD/CPO/5 Objection dated 18 November 2016 on behalf of Standard Life Trustee Company Limited CD/CPO/6 Objection dated 20 October 2016 on behalf of MSCCL, PINL, SCPL, CoSCoS and PSLL CD/CPO/7 Statement of Case on behalf of the acquiring authority (1 November
    [Show full text]
  • Constituents & Weights
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE 100 Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) 3i Group 0.59 UNITED GlaxoSmithKline 3.7 UNITED RELX 1.88 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Admiral Group 0.35 UNITED Glencore 1.97 UNITED Rentokil Initial 0.49 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Anglo American 1.86 UNITED Halma 0.54 UNITED Rightmove 0.29 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Antofagasta 0.26 UNITED Hargreaves Lansdown 0.32 UNITED Rio Tinto 3.41 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Ashtead Group 1.26 UNITED Hikma Pharmaceuticals 0.22 UNITED Rolls-Royce Holdings 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Associated British Foods 0.41 UNITED HSBC Hldgs 4.5 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell A 3.13 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM AstraZeneca 6.02 UNITED Imperial Brands 0.77 UNITED Royal Dutch Shell B 2.74 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Auto Trader Group 0.32 UNITED Informa 0.4 UNITED Royal Mail 0.28 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Avast 0.14 UNITED InterContinental Hotels Group 0.46 UNITED Sage Group 0.39 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aveva Group 0.23 UNITED Intermediate Capital Group 0.31 UNITED Sainsbury (J) 0.24 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM Aviva 0.84 UNITED International Consolidated Airlines 0.34 UNITED Schroders 0.21 UNITED KINGDOM Group KINGDOM KINGDOM B&M European Value Retail 0.27 UNITED Intertek Group 0.47 UNITED Scottish Mortgage Inv Tst 1 UNITED KINGDOM KINGDOM KINGDOM BAE Systems 0.89 UNITED ITV 0.25 UNITED Segro 0.69 UNITED KINGDOM
    [Show full text]