FTSE Factsheet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FTSE Factsheet FTSE COMPANY REPORT Share price analysis relative to sector and index performance Argos Resources ARG Oil Gas and Coal — GBP 0.031 at close 14 May 2021 Absolute Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Sector Relative to FTSE UK All-Share Index PERFORMANCE 14-May-2021 14-May-2021 14-May-2021 0.05 190 160 1D WTD MTD YTD 180 0.045 150 Absolute 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.2 Rel.Sector -2.2 0.4 -3.8 26.9 0.04 170 140 Rel.Market -1.1 1.3 -0.7 32.0 160 0.035 130 150 0.03 VALUATION 140 120 0.025 130 110 Trailing Relative Price Relative 0.02 Price Relative 120 100 PE -ve 0.015 Absolute Price (local (local currency) AbsolutePrice 110 EV/EBITDA -ve 90 0.01 100 PB 0.3 80 0.005 90 PCF +ve 0 80 70 Div Yield 0.0 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 Price/Sales - Absolute Price Relative Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Relative Price 4-wk mov.avg. 13-wk mov.avg. Net Debt/Equity -ve 100 90 100 Div Payout 0.0 90 80 90 ROE -ve 80 70 80 70 Index) Share Share Sector) Share - - 70 60 60 DESCRIPTION 60 50 50 50 The principal activity of the Group is that of oil and 40 40 RSI RSI (Absolute) gas exploration. 40 30 30 20 30 10 20 20 RSI (Relative to FTSE UKFTSE All to RSI (Relative RSI (Relative to FTSE UKFTSE All to RSI (Relative 0 10 10 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 May-2020 Aug-2020 Nov-2020 Feb-2021 May-2021 Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Please see the final page for important legal disclosures. 1 of 4 FTSE COMPANY REPORT: Argos Resources 14 May 2021 Valuation Metrics Price to Earnings (PE) EV to EBITDA Price to Book (PB) 30-Apr-2021 30-Apr-2021 30-Apr-2021 100 ‖ ‖ 1 0.8 0.9 0.7 80 0.8 +1SD 0.7 0.6 60 0.6 0.5 +1SD 0.5 40 Avg 0.4 0.4 Avg 0.3 0.3 20 0.2 0.2 -1SD 0.1 -1SD 0 ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ 0 ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ 0.1 May-2016 May-2017 May-2018 May-2019 May-2020 May-2016 May-2017 May-2018 May-2019 May-2020 May-2016 May-2017 May-2018 May-2019 May-2020 Harbour Energy PLC -0.2 Hunting 30.2 Energean 2.2 EnQuest -0.6 Diversified Energy Company 12.0 Petrofac 1.4 Pharos Energy -0.7 BP 11.5 Lamprell 1.4 Tullow Oil -0.8 Tullow Oil 8.2 Diversified Energy Company 1.3 Lamprell -1.5 Oil Gas and Coal 8.1 BP 1.2 Oil Gas and Coal -4.9 Royal Dutch Shell B 7.6 Oil Gas and Coal 1.0 Cairn Energy -9.4 Harbour Energy PLC 2.8 Pharos Energy 0.5 Wood Group (John) -10.9 Pharos Energy 2.6 Argos Resources 0.3 Energean -20.9 Lamprell 0.0 Harbour Energy PLC 0.0 Argos Resources -21.8 Argos Resources 0.0 Tullow Oil 0.0 Diversified Energy Company -47.5 Energean 0.0 EnQuest 0.0 -50 -45 -40 -35 -30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Price to Cash Flow (PCF) Dividend Yield % Price to Sales (PS) 30-Apr-2021 30-Apr-2021 80 ‖ ‖ 1 +1SD 70 0.9 0.8 60 0.7 50 Avg 0.6 40 0.5 Data unavailable 30 0.4 0.3 20 -1SD 0.2 10 0.1 0 ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ 0 May-2016 May-2017 May-2018 May-2019 May-2020 May-2016 May-2017 May-2018 May-2019 May-2020 Argos Resources 80.0 Diversified Energy Company 9.5 Cairn Energy 2.8 Wood Group (John) 11.3 BP 6.6 Diversified Energy Company 2.7 Hunting 10.3 Oil Gas and Coal 4.6 Pharos Energy 1.1 BP 6.5 Royal Dutch Shell A 3.7 Lamprell 1.1 Oil Gas and Coal 5.0 Royal Dutch Shell B 3.5 Oil Gas and Coal 0.6 Royal Dutch Shell B 4.6 Hunting 1.6 EnQuest 0.4 EnQuest 0.8 Wood Group (John) 0.0 Harbour Energy PLC 0.6 Pharos Energy 0.0 Wood Group (John) 0.3 Petrofac -14.7 Lamprell 0.0 Harbour Energy PLC 0.3 Energean -27.9 Energean 0.0 Petrofac 0.1 Lamprell -46.8 Argos Resources 0.0 Argos Resources 0.0 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Note: bar chart reflects the top and bottom five current values for the valuation ratio in question for FTSE All Shares stocks in the same sector as the stock concerned. All valuation metrics are trailing. 2 of 4 FTSE COMPANY REPORT: Argos Resources 14 May 2021 Valuation Metrics Net Debt to Equity Dividend Payout (DP) Return on Equity (RoE) 30-Apr-2021 30-Apr-2021 30-Apr-2021 1 1 1.4 0.9 0.9 +1SD 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 1 0.6 0.6 0.8 Avg 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 -1SD 0.1 0.1 0 ‖ ‖ 0 0 ‖ ‖ ‖ ‖ May-2016 May-2017 May-2018 May-2019 May-2020 May-2016 May-2017 May-2018 May-2019 May-2020 May-2016 May-2017 May-2018 May-2019 May-2020 Petrofac 2.2 Tullow Oil 0.0 Argos Resources -1.4 Energean 1.6 Pharos Energy 0.0 Diversified Energy Company -2.7 BP 1.2 Harbour Energy PLC 0.0 Wood Group (John) -5.6 Diversified Energy Company 0.8 EnQuest 0.0 Cairn Energy -9.4 Diversified Energy Company Oil Gas and Coal 0.8 0.0 Energean -9.9 Argos Resources 0.0 Royal Dutch Shell B 0.7 Oil Gas and Coal -15.8 Hunting 0.0 Lamprell Pharos Energy 0.4 BP 0.0 -50.0 Cairn Energy 0.2 Oil Gas and Coal 0.0 Lamprell -50.0 Pharos Energy 0.2 Royal Dutch Shell B 0.0 EnQuest -50.0 Hunting 0.0 Royal Dutch Shell A 0.0 Harbour Energy PLC -50.0 Argos Resources 0.0 Cairn Energy 0.0 Tullow Oil -50.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 ROE vs. PB — sector Du Pont Analysis 2.5 1.2 1.6 1.4 ENOG 1 2 1.2 0.8 1 1.5 PFC 0.6 0.8 PB DECLAM BP. 0.6 CNEOil Gas and Coal 1 RDSB 0.4 RDSA 0.4 WG. HTG 0.2 0.5 PHAR 0.2 ARG 0 ‖ ‖ 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 0 TLWHBRENQ 0 0.4 0.8 1.2 Net Margin Asset Turnover Gearing ROE (rhs) ‖ ROE Note: bar chart reflects the top and bottom five current values for the valuation ratio in question for FTSE All Shares stocks in the same sector as the stock concerned. All valuation metrics are trailing. 3 of 4 FTSE COMPANY REPORT: Argos Resources 14 May 2021 Brief description Brief description Price to Earnings Price to Earnings (PE) is price over earnings per share. Earnings are based on the latest Gearing Gearing is Total Assets divided by Common Equity. Total Assets and Common Equity are (PE) available fiscal year earnings. each averaged over two years, that is, t and (t-1). Price to Sales (PS) Price to Sales (PS) is price divided by sales per share. It is based on sales from continuing Asset Turnover Asset turnover is Sales divided by Total Assets. Total Assets is averaged over two years, operations for the fiscal year. that is, t and (t-1). Price to Book (PB) Price to Book (PB) is price at the indicated date divided by common equity per share. Dupont Breakdown Return on Equity (RoE) = Net Margin * Gearing * Asset Turnover Common/ordinary equity is generally as reported at the most recent fiscal year-end but is Analysis adjusted to exclude minority interest, preferred stock and selected items as appropriate. RoE vs PB Plot of RoE versus PB at last month end for all FTSE UK All Share stocks in the sector Price to Cash Flow Price to Cash Flow (PCF) is price at the indicated date divided by cash flow per share. relative to the stock in question. Data may be limited to the stock in question if there are (PCF) currently no stocks in the corresponding FTSE UK All Share sector. Net Debt Equity Net Debt Equity is Net Debt as a percentage of common equity. Not calculated if Absolute Absolute graphs reflect performance for the stock in question for up to 366 days adjusted denominator (common equity) is negative for intervening corporate actions. EV to EBITDA EV to EBITDA is Enterprise Value divided by EBITDA (Earnings before Interest and Taxes, Relative Relative charts reflect the performance for the stock in question relative to the depreciation and amortisation).
Recommended publications
  • 2021 Annual General Meeting and Proxy Statement 2020 Annual Report
    2020 Annual Report and Proxyand Statement 2021 Annual General Meeting Meeting General Annual 2021 Transocean Ltd. • 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT • 2020 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT COMPENSATION REPORT 2020 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS ABOUT TRANSOCEAN LTD. Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on ultra-deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and operates one of the most versatile offshore drilling fleets in the world. Transocean owns or has partial ownership interests in, and operates a fleet of 37 mobile offshore drilling units consisting of 27 ultra-deepwater floaters and 10 harsh environment floaters. In addition, Transocean is constructing two ultra-deepwater drillships. Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RIG. OUR GLOBAL MARKET PRESENCE Ultra-Deepwater 27 Harsh Environment 10 The symbols in the map above represent the company’s global market presence as of the February 12, 2021 Fleet Status Report. ABOUT THE COVER The front cover features two of our crewmembers onboard the Deepwater Conqueror in the Gulf of Mexico and was taken prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, our priorities remain keeping our employees, customers, contractors and their families healthy and safe, and delivering incident-free operations to our customers worldwide. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Any statements included in this Proxy Statement and 2020 Annual Report that are not historical facts, including, without limitation, statements regarding future market trends and results of operations are forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities law.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Inference of Related Trading Between Two Securities: Detecting Pairs Trading, Merger Arbitrage, and Strategy Rules*
    Empirical inference of related trading between two securities: Detecting pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and strategy rules* Keith Godfrey The University of Western Australia Working paper: 5 September 2013 The traditional approach to studying pairs trading is to simulate profitability using ex-post historical prices. I study the actual trades reported anonymously in security pairs and build statistical inferences of related trading. The approach is based on the time differences between trades. It can distinguish intrinsically related securities from pseudo-random sets, find stocks involved in merger arbitrage in massive sets of paired index constituents, and infer dominant trading rules of mean reversion algorithms. Empirical inference of related trading can enable further studies into pairs trading, strategy rules, merger arbitrage, and insider trading. Keywords: Inferred trading, empirical inference, pairs trading, merger arbitrage. JEL Classification Codes: G00, G10, C10, C40, C60 The availability of intraday trading or “tick” data with time resolution of a millisecond or finer is opening many avenues of research into financial markets. Analysis of two or more streams of tick data concurrently is becoming increasingly important in the study of multiple-security trading including index tracking, pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and market-neutral strategies. One of the greatest challenges in empirical trading research is the anonymity of reported trades. Securities exchanges report the dates, times, prices, and volumes traded, without identifying the traders. In studies of a single security, this introduces uncertainty of whether each market order that caused a trade was the buy or sell order, and there are documented approaches of inference such as Lee and Ready (1991).
    [Show full text]
  • To Arrive at the Total Scores, Each Company Is Marked out of 10 Across
    BRITAIN’S MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES THE RESULTS 17th last year as it continues to do well in the growing LNG business, especially in Australia and Brazil. Veteran chief executive Frank Chapman is due to step down in the new year, and in October a row about overstated reserves hit the share price. Some pundits To arrive at the total scores, each company is reckon BG could become a take over target as a result. The biggest climber in the top 10 this year is marked out of 10 across nine criteria, such as quality Petrofac, up to fifth from 68th last year. The oilfield of management, value as a long-term investment, services group may not be as well known as some, but it is doing great business all the same. Its boss, Syrian- financial soundness and capacity to innovate. Here born Ayman Asfari, is one of the growing band of are the top 10 firms by these individual measures wealthy foreign entrepreneurs who choose to make London their operating base and home, to the benefit of both the Exchequer and the employment figures. In fourth place is Rolls-Royce, one of BMAC’s most Financial value as a long-term community and environmental soundness investment responsibility consistent high performers. Hardly a year goes past that it does not feature in the upper reaches of our table, 1= Rightmove 9.00 1 Diageo 8.61 1 Co-operative Bank 8.00 and it has topped its sector – aero and defence engi- 1= Rotork 9.00 2 Berkeley Group 8.40 2 BASF (UK & Ireland) 7.61 neering – for a decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing for Carbon Pricing: Case Studies from Company Experience
    TECHNICAL NOTE 9 | JANUARY 2015 Preparing for Carbon Pricing Case Studies from Company Experience: Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Acknowledgments and Methodology This Technical Note was prepared for the PMR Secretariat by Janet Peace, Tim Juliani, Anthony Mansell, and Jason Ye (Center for Climate and Energy Solutions—C2ES), with input and supervision from Pierre Guigon and Sarah Moyer (PMR Secretariat). The note comprises case studies with three companies: Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). All three have operated in jurisdictions where carbon emissions are regulated. This note captures their experiences and lessons learned preparing for and operating under policies that price carbon emissions. The following information sources were used during the research for these case studies: 1. Interviews conducted between February and October 2014 with current and former employees who had first-hand knowledge of these companies’ activities related to preparing for and operating under carbon pricing regulation. 2. Publicly available resources, including corporate sustainability reports, annual reports, and Carbon Disclosure Project responses. 3. Internal company review of the draft case studies. 4. C2ES’s history of engagement with corporations on carbon pricing policies. Early insights from this research were presented at a business-government dialogue co-hosted by the PMR, the International Finance Corporation, and the Business-PMR of the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) in Cologne, Germany, in May 2014. Feedback from that event has also been incorporated into the final version. We would like to acknowledge experts at Royal Dutch Shell, Rio Tinto, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E)—among whom Laurel Green, David Hone, Sue Lacey and Neil Marshman—for their collaboration and for sharing insights during the preparation of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • BP Plc Vs Royal Dutch Shell
    FEBRUARY 2021 BP plc Vs Royal Dutch Shell 01872 229 000 www.atlanticmarkets.co.uk www.atlanticmarkets.co.uk BP Plc A Brief History BP is a British multinational oil and gas company headquartered in London. It is one of the world’s oil and gas supermajors. · 1908. The founding of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, established as a subsidiary of Burmah Oil Company to take advantage of oil discoveries in Iran. · 1935. It became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company · 1954. Adopted the name British Petroleum. · 1959. The company expanded beyond the Middle East to Alaska and it was one of the first companies to strike oil in the North Sea. · 1978. British Petroleum acquired majority control of Standard Oil of Ohio. Formerly majority state-owned. · 1979–1987. The British government privatised the company in stages between. · 1998. British Petroleum merged with Amoco, becoming BP Amoco plc, · 2000-2001. Acquired ARCO and Burmah Castrol, becoming BP plc. · 2003–2013. BP was a partner in the TNK-BP joint venture in Russia. Positioning BP is a “vertically integrated” company, meaning it’s involved in the whole supply chain – from discovering oil, producing it, refining it, shipping it, trading it and selling it at the petrol pump. BP has operations in nearly 80 countries worldwide and has around 18,700 service stations worldwide. Its largest division is BP America. In Russia, BP also own a 19.75% stake in Rosneft, the world’s largest publicly traded oil and gas company by hydrocarbon reserves and production. BP has a primary listing on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 100 Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2018 Repositioned for Growth
    SOCO plc International Annual Report Annual ReportAnnual 2018 and Accounts and Accounts 2018 Repositioned for growth Strategic Report 02 Repositioned for growth Company overview 02 Chair’s welcome 04 Our future is one of new and Investment case 08 Market overview 10 exciting growth opportunities. CEO’s statement 12 Core strategic objectives 16 We are repositioning to enhance Our strategy in action 18 Business model 20 our existing strengths. We are Key metrics 22 Operations review 24 building new relationships and Financial review 32 Risk management 36 are on a positive course for Risks 38 business growth. Corporate Responsibility 44 Governance Report 61 Chair’s Introduction to Governance 62 Board of Directors 66 Corporate Governance Report 68 Nominations Committee Report 72 Audit and Risk Committee Report 76 Remuneration Report 82 Directors’ Report 97 We are an oil and gas exploration and production company. Financial Statements 101 Headquartered in London and listed on the main market of the Independent Auditor’s Report 102 London Stock Exchange, we have exploration, development Consolidated Income Statement 109 and production interests in Vietnam. Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 109 Balance Sheets 110 Statements of Changes in Equity 111 Cash Flow Statements 112 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 113 Additional Information 135 Non-IFRS Measures 136 Five Year Summary 137 Reserves Statistics 137 Report on Payments to Governments 138 Glossary of Terms 140 Company Information IBC socointernational.com 02 Strategic
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Update January 2021 Pharos Energy / 2 Disclaimer
    Pharos Energy Corporate Update January 2021 Pharos Energy / 2 Disclaimer This presentation has been prepared by Pharos Energy Plc. The presentation does not purport to The Group undertakes no obligation to revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect any be comprehensive and has not been fully verified nor will it be subject to material updating, changes in the Group’s expectations or any change in circumstances, events or the Group’s plans revision or further amendment. The presentation has been provided for information purposes only. and strategy. Accordingly, no reliance may be placed on the figures contained in such forward- looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees or representations of future Nothing in this presentation or in any accompanying management discussion of this presentation performance. Similarly, past share performance cannot be relied on as a guide to future constitutes, nor is it intended to constitute: (i) an invitation or inducement to engage in any performance. Even if the Group’s results of operations, financial and market conditions, and the investment activity, whether in the United Kingdom or in any other jurisdiction; (ii) any development of the industry in which the Group operates, are consistent with the forward-looking recommendation or advice in respect of the ordinary shares (the Shares) in Pharos Energy plc or statements contained in the presentation, those results, conditions or developments may not be the group of companies of which it is the ultimate holding company (together the Group); or (iii) indicative of results, conditions or developments in subsequent periods. any offer for the sale, purchase or subscription of any Shares.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas
    Canadian Energy Research Institute Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas Jon Rozhon March 2012 Relevant • Independent • Objective Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas 1 Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands There has been a steady flow of foreign investment into the oil sands industry over the past decade in terms of merger and acquisition (M&A) activity. Out of a total CDN$61.5 billion in M&A’s, approximately half – or CDN$30.3 billion – involved foreign companies taking an ownership stake. These funds were invested in in situ projects, integrated projects, and land leases. As indicated in Figure 1, US and Chinese companies made the most concerted efforts to increase their profile in the oil sands, investing 2/3 of all foreign capital. The US and China both invested in a total of seven different projects. The French company, Total SA, has also spread its capital around several projects (four in total) while Royal Dutch Shell (UK), Statoil (Norway), and PTT (Thailand) each opted to take large positions in one project each. Table 1 provides a list of all foreign investments in the oil sands since 2004. Figure 1: Total Oil Sands Foreign Investment since 2003, Country of Origin Korea 1% Thailand Norway 6% UK 7% 2% US France 33% 18% China 33% Source: Canoils. Foreign Investment in the Oil Sands and British Columbia Shale Gas 2 Table 1: Oil Sands Foreign Investment Deals Year Country Acquirer Brief Description Total Acquisition Cost (000) 2012 China PetroChina 40% interest in MacKay River 680,000 project from AOSC 2011 China China National Offshore Acquisition of OPTI Canada 1,906,461 Oil Corporation 2010 France Total SA Alliance with Suncor.
    [Show full text]
  • Negativliste. Fossil Energi
    Negativliste. Fossil energi Maj 2021 Udstedende selskab 1 ABJA Investment Co Pte Ltd 2 ABM Investama Tbk PT 3 Aboitiz Equity Ventures Inc 4 Aboitiz Power Corp 5 Abraxas Petroleum Corp 6 Abu Dhabi National Energy Co PJSC 7 AC Energy Finance International Ltd 8 Adams Resources & Energy Inc 9 Adani Electricity Mumbai Ltd 10 Adani Power Ltd 11 Adani Transmission Ltd 12 Adaro Energy Tbk PT 13 Adaro Indonesia PT 14 ADES International Holding PLC 15 Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd 16 Aegis Logistics Ltd 17 Aenza SAA 18 AEP Transmission Co LLC 19 AES Alicura SA 20 AES El Salvador Trust II 21 AES Gener SA 22 AEV International Pte Ltd 23 African Rainbow Minerals Ltd 24 AGL Energy Ltd 25 Agritrade Resources Ltd 26 AI Candelaria Spain SLU 27 Air Water Inc 28 Akastor ASA 29 Aker BP ASA 30 Aker Solutions ASA 31 Aksa Akrilik Kimya Sanayii AS 32 Aksa Enerji Uretim AS 33 Alabama Power Co 34 Alarko Holding AS 35 Albioma SA 36 Alexandria Mineral Oils Co 37 Alfa Energi Investama Tbk PT 38 ALLETE Inc 1 39 Alliance Holdings GP LP 40 Alliance Resource Operating Partners LP / Alliance Resource Finance Corp 41 Alliance Resource Partners LP 42 Alliant Energy Corp 43 Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc 44 Alpha Natural Resources Inc 45 Alta Mesa Resources Inc 46 AltaGas Ltd 47 Altera Infrastructure LP 48 Altius Minerals Corp 49 Altus Midstream Co 50 Aluminum Corp of China Ltd 51 Ameren Corp 52 American Electric Power Co Inc 53 American Shipping Co ASA 54 American Tanker Inc 55 AmeriGas Partners LP / AmeriGas Finance Corp 56 Amplify Energy Corp 57 Amplify Energy Corp/TX 58
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11 ) VALARIS PLC, Et Al.,1 ) Case No
    Case 20-34114 Document 105 Filed in TXSB on 08/23/20 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) VALARIS PLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-34114 (MI) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) (Emergency Hearing Requested) DEBTORS’ AMENDED WITNESS LIST AND EXHIBIT LIST FOR MATTERS SET FOR AUGUST 24, 2020 The above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) file their Amended Witness and Exhibit List for the hearing to be held on August 24, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. (prevailing Central Time) (the “Hearing”) as follows.2 Witnesses The Debtors may call the following witnesses at the Hearing:3 1. Jonathan Baksht, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Valaris PLC; 2. James Sean McGuire, Director, Stretto; 3. any witness listed by any other party; and 4. rebuttal witnesses as necessary. 1 A complete list of each of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ proposed claims and noticing agent at http://cases.stretto.com/Valaris. The location of Debtor Ensco Incorporated’s principal place of business and the Debtors’ service address in these chapter 11 cases is 5847 San Felipe Street, Suite 3300, Houston, Texas 77057. 2 The Debtors reserve the right to amend this Witness and Exhibit List after reviewing any objections. 3 The Debtors reserve the right to cross-examine any witness called by any other party at the Hearing. 1 Case 20-34114 Document 105 Filed in TXSB on 08/23/20 Page 2 of 4 Exhibits4 Object Admit Mark Offer Disposition No.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Extractive Companies Measure and Report Their Social Performance? Review of Approaches to Impact Assessment
    ECONOMIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR PROFESSIONAL EVIDENCE AND APPLIED KNOWLEDGE SERVICES HELPDESK REQUEST How do extractive companies measure and report their social performance? Review of approaches to impact assessment Carolin Williams ODI April 2014 How do extractive companies measure and report their social performance? EPS-PEAKS is a consortium of organisations that provides Economics and Private Sector Professional Evidence and Applied Knowledge Services to the DfID. The core services include: 1) Helpdesk 2) Document library 3) Information on training and e-learning opportunities 4) Topic guides 5) Structured professional development sessions 6) E-Bulletin To find out more or access EPS-PEAKS services or feedback on this or other output, visit the EPS- PEAKS community on http://partnerplatform.org/eps-peaks or contact Yurendra Basnett, Knowledge Manager, EPS-PEAKS core services at [email protected]. Disclaimer Statement: The views presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Consortium partner organisations, DFID or the UK Government. The authors take full responsibility for any errors or omissions contained in this report. 2 How do extractive companies measure and report their social performance? Table of Contents 1 Query and approach 4 2 Individual company level reviews of social performance reporting 6 2.1 Anglo American 6 2.2 BG Group 11 2.3 BHP Billiton 13 2.4 BP 17 2.5 Newmont 19 2.6 Rio Tinto 21 2.7 Royal Dutch Shell 24 2.8 Tullow Oil 27 3 Headlines from reviews of companies’ social performance reporting 30 3 How do extractive companies measure and report their social performance? 1 Query and approach Extractive companies tend to spend significant amounts on community based development projects to improve their social performance.
    [Show full text]
  • BP Plc Vs Royal Dutch Shell Which One to Buy Right Now
    DECEMBER 2019 ATLANTIC ADVISORY BP plc Vs Royal Dutch Shell Which one to buy right now 01872 229 000 www.atlanticmarkets.co.uk01872 229 000 www.atlanticadvisory.co.uk www.atlanticmarkets.co.uk BP Plc Ticker BP. Objective Capital growth and income Dividend Yield 6.71% A Brief History BP is a British multinational oil and gas company headquartered in London. It is one of the world’s oil and gas supermajors. · 1908. The founding of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, established as a subsidiary of Burmah Oil Company to take advantage of oil discoveries in Iran. · 1935. It became the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company · 1954. Adopted the name British Petroleum. · 1959. The company expanded beyond the Middle East to Alaska and it was one of the first companies to strike oil in the North Sea. · 1978. British Petroleum acquired majority control of Standard Oil of Ohio. Formerly majority state- owned. · 1979–1987. The British government privatised the company in stages between. · 1998. British Petroleum merged with Amoco, becoming BP Amoco plc, · 2000-2001. Acquired ARCO and Burmah Castrol, becoming BP plc. · 2003–2013. BP was a partner in the TNK-BP joint venture in Russia. Positioning Bp is a “vertically integrated” company, meaning it’s involved in the whole supply chain – from discovering oil, producing it, refining it, shipping it, trading it and selling it at the petrol pump. BP has operations in nearly 80 countries worldwide, produced around 3.7 million barrels per day (590,000 m3/d) of oil equivalent, and had total proven reserves of 19.945 billion barrels (3.1710×109 m3) of oil equivalent.
    [Show full text]