DOCSLIB.ORG

BCT Transit Development Plan Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BCT Transit Development Plan Final TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1-1 Objectives of the Plan .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 TDP Requirements ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 Organization of Report ......................................................................................................................... 1-2 2 Public Involvement Plan .............................................................................................................................. 2-1 Public Involvement Objectives ............................................................................................................. 2-1 Public Involvement Results .................................................................................................................. 2-1 3 Baseline Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 3-1 Service Area Description ...................................................................................................................... 3-1 Population Profile ................................................................................................................................ 3-3 City and Town Population and Trends ............................................................................................... 3-4 Projected Population and Dwelling Unit Growth .............................................................................. 3-5 Demographic Profile ........................................................................................................................ 3-11 Transportation Disadvantaged Population Estimates ....................................................................... 3-20 Labor Force ...................................................................................................................................... 3-20 Major Employers .............................................................................................................................. 3-21 Employment Density ........................................................................................................................ 3-21 Journey-to-Work Characteristics ....................................................................................................... 3-25 Commuting Patterns ........................................................................................................................ 3-25 Travel Time to Work ........................................................................................................................ 3-26 Means of Travel to Work ................................................................................................................. 3-26 Roadway Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 3-26 Tourism .............................................................................................................................................. 3-27 Land Use Characteristics .................................................................................................................... 3-27 Market Assessment ............................................................................................................................ 3-32 Discretionary Market Assessment ................................................................................................... 3-32 Traditional Market Assessment ....................................................................................................... 3-36 4 Public Involvement Summary ..................................................................................................................... 4-1 Summary of Public Involvement Since the 2013 TDP Major Update .................................................. 4-1 2018 TDP Major Update Public Involvement Activities ....................................................................... 4-3 Branding ............................................................................................................................................. 4-3 Advisory Review Committee .............................................................................................................. 4-3 On-Board Survey ................................................................................................................................ 4-4 Stakeholder Interviews .................................................................................................................... 4-15 TDP Webpage .................................................................................................................................. 4-16 Discussion Groups ............................................................................................................................ 4-16 Online Survey ................................................................................................................................... 4-17 Telephone Surveys ........................................................................................................................... 4-19 Focus Groups ................................................................................................................................... 4-24 Community Drop-In Events .............................................................................................................. 4-27 Presentations ................................................................................................................................... 4-28 BCT Connected 2019-2028 Transit Development Plan i TABLE OF CONTENTS Public Involvement Summary .......................................................................................................... 4-29 5 Evaluation of Existing Transit System ......................................................................................................... 5-1 Existing Service ..................................................................................................................................... 5-1 Fixed-Route Service ........................................................................................................................... 5-3 Community Shuttle Service ............................................................................................................... 5-9 Paratransit Service ........................................................................................................................... 5-12 Other Service Providers ................................................................................................................... 5-13 Trend Analysis and Peer System Review............................................................................................ 5-20 Peer System Selection...................................................................................................................... 5-21 Peer and Trend Analysis Findings – Fixed-Route ............................................................................. 5-23 Peer and Trend Analysis Findings – TOPS Demand Response ......................................................... 5-38 Demand-Response Peer and Trend Analysis Summary of Key Findings .......................................... 5-45 6 Situation Appraisal ...................................................................................................................................... 6-1 Review of Plans and Policies ................................................................................................................ 6-1 Socioeconomic Trends ....................................................................................................................... 6-13 Travel Markets ................................................................................................................................... 6-13 Land Use ............................................................................................................................................. 6-15 Regional Transportation Issues .......................................................................................................... 6-16 2018 Transportation Surtax Referendum ........................................................................................ 6-16 Brightline .......................................................................................................................................... 6-17 Public Involvement .......................................................................................................................... 6-17 Coordination with Other Transit Agencies ...................................................................................... 6-18 Technology Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 6-18 Organization and Governance Assessment ....................................................................................... 6-19 Organizational Structure .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Optimization Tool for Transit Bus Fleet Management
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2012 Optimization tool for transit bus fleet management Feng Zhen West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Zhen, Feng, "Optimization tool for transit bus fleet management" (2012). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 600. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/600 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OPTIMIZATION TOOL FOR TRANSIT BUS FLEET MANAGEMENT by Feng Zhen Dissertation submitted to the College of Engineering and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering Approved by Nigel N. Clark, Ph.D., Committee Chairperson W. Scott Wayne, Ph.D. Hailin Li, Ph.D. Benjamin C. Shade, Ph.D. Roy S. Nutter, Jr., Ph.D. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Morgantown, West Virginia 2012 Keywords: Transit Bus Operation, Cost Evaluation, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Operation Optimization, Genetic Algorithm Copyright 2012 Feng Zhen ABSTRACT OPTIMIZATION TOOL FOR TRANSIT BUS FLEET Management By Feng Zhen Transit agencies face the challenge of being environmentally-friendly, while maintaining cost-effective operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Th E V O Lvo G Ro U P 2 0
    THE VOLVO GROUP ANNUAL REPORT 2012 The V olvo olvo G roup 2012 TOGETHER WE MOVE THE WORLD www.volvogroup.com A Global Group 2 CEO comment TOGETHER WE MOVE THE OperatiNG coNteXT 4 Future transport needs StrategY 8 Strategic approach BUsiNess model 22 Product offering WORLD 28 World-class services 30 A high-performing organization Without the products and services of the Volvo 32 Industrial structure Group the societies where many of us live 34 Production 35 Responsible sourcing would not function. Like lifeblood, our trucks, GroUP PerformaNce buses, engines and construction equipment are 36 Global strength involved in many of the functions that most of 38 Development by continent − Europe us rely on every day. 40 Focus new Volvo FH 42 Development by continent − North America For instance, one in seven meals eaten in 44 Development by continent − South America Europe reaches the consumers thanks to trucks 46 Focus Peru 48 Development by continent − Asia from the Volvo Group rolling on the roads of the 50 Focus Dongfeng continent. Buses are the most common type of 52 Focus Africa public transportation in the world, helping many Board of Directors’ report people to reach work, school, vacations, friends 56 Significant events and family. If all the Volvo buses in the world were 58 Trucks to start at the same time, they would transport 60 Buses more than 10 million people. Our construction 62 Construction equipment 64 Volvo Penta machines are used when building roads, houses, 66 Volvo Financial Services hospitals, airports, railroads, factories, offices, 68 Financial management shopping centers and recreational facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Operator Safety - Critical Issues Examination and Model Practices FDOT: BDK85 977-48 NCTR 13(07)
    Bus Operator Safety - Critical Issues Examination and Model Practices FDOT: BDK85 977-48 NCTR 13(07) FINAL REPORT January 2014 PREPARED FOR Florida Department of Transportation Bus Operator Safety Critical Issues Examination and Model Practices Final Report Funded By: FDOT Project Managers: Robert Westbrook, Transit Operations Administrator Victor Wiley, Transit Safety Program Manager Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS-26 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Prepared By: USF Center for Urban Transportation Research Lisa Staes, Program Director Jay A. Goodwill, Senior Research Associate Roberta Yegidis, Affiliated Faculty January 2014 Final Report i Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program and the Florida Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government and the Florida Department of Transportation assume no liability for the contents or use thereof. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation. Final Report ii Metric Conversion SI* Modern Metric Conversion Factors as provided by the Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/aaa/metricp.htm LENGTH SYMBOL WHEN YOU MULTIPLY
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Operation, Quality Service and the Role of Bus Provider and Driver
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Engineering 53 ( 2013 ) 167 – 178 Malaysian Technical Universities Conference on Engineering & Technology 2012, MUCET 2012 Part 3 - Civil and Chemical Engineering Bus Operation, Quality Service and The Role of Bus Provider and Driver Munzilah Md. Rohaniª*, Devapriya Chitral Wijeyesekeraª, Ahmad Tarmizi Abd. Karima aFaculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Parit Raja, 86400, Johor, Malaysia Abstract This paper outlined the important role played by public transport to meet the demand of business and social life. The paper reviewed the type of bus services, quality of service in the bus operation that influences the passenger decision and also the role of bus provider and bus driver. An improved understanding of the bus operation is important for a well managed bus services. Maintaining a high standard of quality in service and performance is of paramount importance to encourage people to make public transport their preferred choice. © 20132013 TheTh eAuthors. Autho rPublisheds. Published by Elsevier by Elsev Ltd.ier Ltd. Selection and and/or peer-review peer-r undereview responsibility under responsibility of the Research of the Management Research & Management Innovation Centre, & Innovatio Universitin Malaysia Centre, Universiti Malaysia PPerliserlis. Keywords: Bus operation; quality service; bus driver; bus provider. 1. Introduction Across the world, public bus operation play important role to provide transport for commuting passengers. Bus services are provided by different bus agencies with their own specific aims. For instance, in Hampshire, UK, it was reported that 70% of public buses are operated and run by private commercial companies while 30% are funded wholly or partly by the Hampshire County Council or by local district [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Relief Convoy Rolls Into New Orleans Coach USA Lending Its Support to America’S Emergency Services
    NZ wraps Fishy flavour Brave drivers Thousands up safety to marketing keep London flock to the message campaign moving fairways The newspaper of Stagecoach Group Issue 60 Autumn 2005 Relief convoy rolls into New Orleans Coach USA lending its support to America’s emergency services. Coach USA helps mass evacuation after Hurricane Katrina by Steven Stewart away from the worst-affected areas. s the people of New “We had a tremendous response AOrleans reeled under from our employees at Coach USA, the devastation caused and our support team worked closely by Hurricane Katrina, Pennsylvania, New York and West with the Federal Government and Stagecoach rolled up its Virginia – helped evacuate some of the offered them every assistance they thousands of people made homeless could.” sleeves to help with the by the disaster. The US Federal Government asked unprecedented relief effort Coach USA employees also donated for assistance from coach and school in the stricken Gulf Coast. bottled water, food items and toiletries, bus operators as thousands of square On hearing the plight of thousands which were loaded onto the vehicles. miles of Louisiana and Mississippi of residents stranded without food or The aid was delivered to the American remained under water. water, many unable to flee the city Red Cross to be distributed to those in The Coach USA team also assisted before the hurricane swept ashore, the need. the Federal Emergency Management company’s Coach USA division dis- Brian Souter, Stagecoach Group Agency in the New Orleans area in the patched a convoy of 12 coaches and 24 Chief Executive, said: “Hurricane immediate aftermath of the hurricane.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTRIFYING TRANSIT: a GUIDEBOOK for IMPLEMENTING BATTERY ELECTRIC BUSES Alana Aamodt, Karlynn Cory, and Kamyria Coney National Renewable Energy Laboratory
    ELECTRIFYING TRANSIT: A GUIDEBOOK FOR IMPLEMENTING BATTERY ELECTRIC BUSES Alana Aamodt, Karlynn Cory, and Kamyria Coney National Renewable Energy Laboratory April 2021 A product of the USAID-NREL Partnership Contract No. IAG-17-2050 NOTICE This work was authored, in part, by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE- AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Contract No. IAG-17-2050 as well as the Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists, Science Undergraduate Laboratory Internship. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government, or any agency thereof, including USAID. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) reports produced after 1991 and a growing number of pre-1991 documents are available free via www.OSTI.gov. Cover photo from iStock 1184915589. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Sarah Lawson and Andrew Fang of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for their review and support for this work. We wish to thank our National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) colleagues, Andrea Watson and Alexandra Aznar, for their support of this report. Other NREL colleagues, including Caley Johnson, Leslie Eudy, and Scott Belding provided invaluable public transit electrification insight for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Services Comprehensive Evaluation Anne
    Transportation Services Comprehensive Evaluation Anne Arundel County Public Schools 20460 Chartwell Center Drive PrismaticServices.com Suite 1 (704) 438-9929 (voice/fax) Cornelius, NC 28031-5254 USA [email protected] Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................... 1-1 Methodology .....................................................................................................1-4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................. 1-6 Report Organization ........................................................................................... 1-6 2 Stakeholder Surveys ....................................................................... 2-1 Overall Transportation Grades ........................................................................... 2-2 Bus Contractor Service Quality ............................................................................ 2-3 Operational Readiness ........................................................................................ 2-4 Timeliness .................................................................................................... 2-5 Lost Instructional Time ...................................................................................... 2-7 Contractor Performance ..................................................................................... 2-8 Ride Times ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Key Considerations for Transit Electrification and Charging Infrastructure Deployment to Deliver Predictable
    BEST PRACTICES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSIT ELECTRIFICATION AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT TO DELIVER PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE FLEET SYSTEMS JUNE 2020 AUTHORS Dr.Josipa Petrunic, President & CEO Dr. Elnaz Abotalebi, Researcher & Project Lead Dr. Abhishek Raj, Researcher 2 COPYRIGHT © 2020 Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium for the account of Natural Resources Canada. The material in it reflects the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium’s best judgment, in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. UPDATE: COVID-19 PUBLICATION IMPACT The publication of this report has been delayed by three months due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This report, and the majority of research included within it, was completed primarily between September 2019 and March 2020 – prior to the novel coronavirus pandemic affecting local economies and transit revenue across Canada. While efforts have been made to include relevant announcements by Canadian transit agencies since that time, specifically as they relate to electric buses, many investment decisions and funding programs related to municipal green infrastructure deployments may change this year as a result of the financial crisis unfolding in cities across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MAGAZINE of Registered Charity No
    No.55 - SPRING 2012 www.leylandsociety.co.uk THE MAGAZINE OF Registered Charity No. 1137856 LLeylandeyland covercover T55.inddT55.indd 1 66/3/12/3/12 118:44:148:44:14 Hon. PRESIDENT Andrea Thompson, Managing Director, Leyland Trucks Ltd. Hon. VICE PRESIDENTS Gordon Baron, 44 Rhoslan Park, 76 Conwy Road, Colwyn Bay LL29 7HR Neil D. Steele, 18 Kingfi sher Crescent, Cheadle, Staffordshire, ST10 1RZ CHAIRMAN, BCVM LIAISON Ron Phillips, 16 Victoria Avenue, ‘FLEET BOOKS’ EDITOR Grappenhall, Warrington, WA4 2PD EDITOR and SECRETARY Mike A Sutcliffe MBE, ‘Valley Forge’ 213 Castle Hill Road, Totternhoe, Dunstable, Beds LU6 2DA MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY David J. Moores, 10 Lady Gate, Diseworth, Derby DE74 2QF TREASURER David E.Berry, 40 Bodiam Drive, VEHICLE REGISTRAR Toothill, Swindon, Wilts, SN5 8BE WEBMASTER John Woodhouse, contact via David Bishop WEBSITE & NEW MEMBERS David L. Bishop, ‘Sunnyside’ Whitchurch Road, Aston, Nantwich, CW5 8DB TECHNICAL & SPARES Don Hilton, 79 Waterdell, Leighton Buzzard, Beds. LU7 3PL EVENT COORDINATOR Gary Dwyer, 8 St Mary’s Close, West St. Sompting, Lancing, W. Sussex BN15 0AF COMMITTEE MEMBER John Howie, 37 Balcombe Gardens, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9BY COMMITTEE MEMBER Terry Spalding, 5 Layton Avenue, Mansfi eld, Notts. NG18 5PJ Available from good newsagents. MEMBERSHIP Price £3.75 Subscription levels are £24 per annum (Family £28), £30 for EEC members, £35 (in Sterling) for or e-mail [email protected] membership outside the EEC. Anyone joining after 1st April and before 31st July will have their membership carried over to the next 31st July, ie up to 16 months. This is good value for money and new members are welcomed.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Transport in Sri Lanka Through an Electric Bus Rapid Transit System
    Empowered lives. Resilient nations. NATIONALLY APPROPRIATE MITIGATION ACTION: SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT IN SRI LANKA THROUGH AN ELECTRIC BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM United Nations Development Programme Empowered lives. Resilient nations. UNDP partners with people at all levels of society to help build nations that can withstand crisis, and drive and sustain the kind of growth that improves the quality of life for everyone. On the ground in 177 countries and territories, we offer global perspectives and local insight to help empower lives and build resilient nations. www.undp.org UNDP MDG Carbon is an innovative programme that assists developing countries in implementing a host of low- carbon interventions, spanning multiple technologies, active in all regions of the world, and leveraging significant amounts in private-sector millions of dollars in independent co-investments. Technical Oversight and Guidance Alexandra Soezer, Project Manager, UNDP MDG Carbon Lead Author Manpreet Singh, KPMG India Co-Authors Sandip Keswani, KPMG India, Shouvik Sen, KPMG India and Pyumi Sumanasekara, KPMG Sri Lanka Reviewers Ministry of Transport, Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment, Department of Motor Traffic, National Transport Commission, Sri Lanka Transport Board, Ministry of University Education & Highways, Department of External Resources, Urban Development Authority, Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority, National Engineering Research Development Centre, Department of National Planning, The Ceylon Chamber of Commerce, UNDP Sri Lanka, KPMG Sri Lanka, KPMG India, Knowledge Manufacturing Company (KMC), Japan, Prof W.L. Sumathipala - Chairman NECCC – Mitigation, Mr. Nimal Perera - Expert for GHG Emission Acknowledgements Special thanks to Dr. Sunimal Jayathunga, Director (Climate Change) for his patronage. Contact Information Dissabandara Sunimal Jayathunga, PhD Director (Climate Change & Sustainable Development) Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Options for Deployment of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles in Asia
    DRAFT FOR PARTICIPANTS ONLY 2 October 2018 ENGLISH ONLY UNITED NATIONS CENTRE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT In collaboration with Ministry of Construction and Urban Development, Mongolia Ministry of Roads and Transport Development, Mongolia Ministry of Environment and Tourism, Mongolia Municipality of Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific INTERGOVERNMENTAL ELEVENTH REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT (EST) FORUM IN ASIA 2-5 OCTOBER 2018, ULAANBAATAR, MONGOLIA Policy Options for Deployment of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles in Asia (Background Paper for EST Plenary Session-6) Pre-Final Draft ------------------------------------- This background paper has been prepared by Mr Madan B. Regmi and Phunjasit Chokesomritpol, UN ESCAP for the Eleventh Regional EST Forum in Asia. The views expressed herein are those of the author only and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. Disclaimer: The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 1 DRAFT 11th EST Forum in Asia, 2-5 October 2018, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Background Document for EST Plenary Session 6 Policy Options for Deployment of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles in Asia Madan B. Regmi and Phunjasit Chokesomritpol Transport Division, United Nations ESCAP Abstract The rapid urbanization in Asia, where share of urban population has reached 48 per cent, is posing major challenges for Asian countries in provision of sustainable urban transport systems and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Operator Safety - Critical Issues Examination and Model Practices FDOT: BDK85 977-48 NCTR 13(07)
    Bus Operator Safety - Critical Issues Examination and Model Practices FDOT: BDK85 977-48 NCTR 13(07) FINAL REPORT January 2014 PREPARED FOR Florida Department of Transportation Bus Operator Safety Critical Issues Examination and Model Practices DRAFT Final Report Funded By: FDOT Project Managers: Robert Westbrook, Transit Operations Administrator Victor Wiley, Transit Safety Program Manager Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS-26 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 Prepared By: USF Center for Urban Transportation Research Lisa Staes, Program Director Jay A. Goodwill, Senior Research Associate Roberta Yegidis, Affiliated Faculty January 2014 Final Report i Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program and the Florida Department of Transportation, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government and the Florida Department of Transportation assume no liability for the contents or use thereof. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation. Final Report ii Metric Conversion SI* Modern Metric Conversion Factors as provided by the Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/aaa/metricp.htm LENGTH SYMBOL WHEN
    [Show full text]