DOCSLIB.ORG

Species of Greatest Conservation Need

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Barking Hyla gratiosa II a Forest Forests near or within The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information System indicates treefrog shallow wetlands the loss suitable wetlands constitute the greatest threats to this species. DGIF recommends working to maintain or restore forested buffers surrounding occupied wetlands. These needs are consistent with action plan priorities to conserve and restore wetland habitats and associated buffers. Recently discovered populations within its known range, may indicate this species is more abundant than previously believed. An in-depth investigation into its status may warrant delisting. This species will be prioritized as Tier 2a. Amphibians Blue Ridge Desmognathus IV c Forest High elevation seeps, This species' distribution is very limited. Other than limiting dusky orestes streams, wet rock faces, logging activity in the occupied areas, no conservation salamander and riparian forests actions have been identified. Unless other threats or actions are identified, this species will be listed as Tier 4c. Amphibians Blue Ridge Eurycea III a Wetland Mountain streams and The needs of this species are consistent with priorities for two-lined wilderae adjacent riparian areas maintaining and enhancing riparian forests and aquatic salamander with mixed hardwood or habitats. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. spruce-fir forests up to 6000 feet. Amphibians Carpenter Lithobates III a Wetland Freshwater wetlands with The needs of this species are consistent with action plan frog virgatipes sphagnum moss priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland habitats and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. Amphibians Common Necturus III a Wetland Permanent lakes, ponds, The needs of this species are consistent with action plan mudpuppy maculosus impoundments, streams, priorities to preserve and restore aquatic habitats and maculosus and rivers with suitable water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. hiding cover Amphibians Cow Knob Plethodon I c Forest Site specific - mixed DGIF staff have indicated this species will always face a salamander punctatus hardwood forests in rocky significant threat of extinction due to its limited range. areas in high elevations However, no conservation actions or research have been identified to help conserve this species, most of the habitat is protected via conservation agreements between the U.S. Forest Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. As such, it is recommended that this species be prioritized as Tier 1c. 26-1 APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Cumberland Plethodon IV c Forest Mature hardwood forests This species requires large stands of mature forests. This Plateau kentucki in the vicinity of rocky habitat type appears to be abundant within this species' salamander outcrops distribution. Until additional threats or actions are identified, this species will be listed as Tier 4c. Amphibians Dwarf Necturus III a Wetland Sluggish streams and The needs of this species are consistent with action plan waterdog punctatus blackwater streams with priorities to preserve and restore aquatic habitats and debris water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. Amphibians Eastern Cryptobranchus I a Aquatic Clean streams and rivers DGIF staff have recommended this species be listed as a hellbender alleganiensis with rocky substrates Tier 1a species. The eastern hellbender has been alleganiensis petitioned for protection under the Federal Endangered Species Act. Virginia's populations of hellbenders have been impacted by sedimentation, chemical pollutants, and impoundments in the clear, fast flowing, well oxygenated stream and river habitats they require. Hellbenders are also occasionally caught and killed by anglers fishing for sportfish. Conservation actions identified by DGIF staff include working to maintain and improve water quality, the use of artificial nest boxes, captive propagation, public education, and conducting research to better detect and assess hellbender populations. Amphibians Eastern mud Pseudotriton IV a Wetland Freshwater wetlands with The needs of this species are consistent with action plan salamander montanus sphagnum moss priorities to preserve and restore aquatic habitats, wetland montanus habitats, and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 4a. Amphibians Eastern Scaphiopus IV c Forest Forest and upland habitat No conservation actions or research needs have been spadefoot holbrookii generalist but require fish identified for this species. This species will be listed as Tier free breeding sites and 4c. soils suitable for digging 26-2 APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Eastern tiger Ambystoma II a Forest In the east, habitat needs This species is known from a handful of sites in the Coastal salamander tigrinum are site specific wetlands Plain and the Blue Ridge. The greatest threats include the within pine savanna. The loss of breeding ponds and the adjacent woodlands. mountain population Populations can also be lost if fish are introduced into the utilizes mature forest in breeding ponds. The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information proximity to seasonally Service indicates efforts to preserve breeding ponds and flooded sinkhole ponds. associated vegetated buffers should continue. Efforts have been established to maintain existing sites. The single greatest conservation action to protect the Coastal Plain population would be the permanent protection of the Cat Ponds. This species will be prioritized as Tier 2a. Amphibians Greater siren Siren lacertina IV a Wetland Tolerates a variety of The needs of this species are consistent with action plan warm aquatic habitats priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland with abundant vegetation habitats and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 4a. Amphibians Green Aneides aeneus II b Forest Damp, but not wet, The most significant threat to this species involves logging salamander crevices in shaded rock areas that contain occupied rock outcrops. Conservation outcrops and ledges in action includes maintaining forested buffers around forested areas occupied rock outcrops. However, recent investigations indicate this species may be more aboreal than previously believed. These habitats do not appear to be limited within its distribution. Until a more through assessment of its status and habitat usage is completed, a Tier 2b status is warranted. Amphibians Jefferson Ambystoma IV a Forest West of Shenandoah River The needs of this species are consistent with action plan salamander jeffersonianum - high elevation hardwood priorities to preserve and restore forested wetlands. This forests with suitable species will be listed as Tier 4a breeding ponds. Amphibians Lesser siren Siren intermedia III a Wetland Tolerates a variety of The needs of this species are consistent with action plan intermedia warm aquatic habitats priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland with abundant vegetation habitats and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 3a. 26-3 APPENDIX A. VIRGINIA SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Scientific Name Tier Cons. Opp. Habitat Descriptive Habitat Notes Name Ranking Amphibians Little grass Pseudacris IV a Forest Most abundant in The habitat needs of this species are consistent with action frog ocularis wetlands within pine plan priorities to preserve and restore wetland habitats and savanna habitats vegetated buffers around wetlands. This species will be listed as Tier 4a. Amphibians Mabee's Ambystoma II a Barren Pine and hardwood DGIF indicates the most significant threat to this species salamander mabeei forests with vernal ponds involves urban development, forest loss and the draining of and other water sources vernal ponds. The Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information suitable for breeding System indicates known breeding sites and surrounding forested buffers should be conserved. As this need aligns with the priority to conserve riparian forests and large patches of forest in eastern Virginia, this species will be listed as Tier 2a. Amphibians Many-lined Stereochilus IV a Forest Gum and cypress swamps The needs of this species are consistent with action plan salamander marginatus as well as other wooded priorities to preserve and restore aquatic and wetland wetlands habitats and water quality. This species will be listed as Tier 4a. Amphibians Mole Ambystoma II a Forest Hardwood and mixed DGIF indicates the most significant threat to this species salamander talpoideum forests containing fish- involves forest loss and the draining of vernal ponds. The free breeding ponds Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information System indicates known breeding sites and surrounding forested buffers should be conserved. As this need aligns with the priority to conserve riparian forests and large patches of forest in eastern Virginia, this species will be listed as Tier 2a. Amphibians Mountain Pseudacris II a Aquatic Forested areas up to 3500 DGIF indicates the most significant threat to this species chorus frog brachyphona feet that contain suitable involves the loss of occupied wetlands and surrounding
Recommended publications
  • Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices

    Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices

    Biodiversity Work Group Report: Appendices A: Initial List of Important Sites..................................................................................................... 2 B: An Annotated List of the Mammals of Albemarle County........................................................ 5 C: Birds ......................................................................................................................................... 18 An Annotated List of the Birds of Albemarle County.............................................................. 18 Bird Species Status Tables and Charts...................................................................................... 28 Species of Concern in Albemarle County............................................................................ 28 Trends in Observations of Species of Concern..................................................................... 30 D. Fish of Albemarle County........................................................................................................ 37 E. An Annotated Checklist of the Amphibians of Albemarle County.......................................... 41 F. An Annotated Checklist of the Reptiles of Albemarle County, Virginia................................. 45 G. Invertebrate Lists...................................................................................................................... 51 H. Flora of Albemarle County ...................................................................................................... 69 I. Rare
  • Maryland Darter Etheostoma Sellare

    Maryland Darter Etheostoma Sellare

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Maryland darter Etheostoma Sellare Introduction The Maryland darter is a small freshwater fish only known from a limited area in Harford County, Maryland. These areas, Swan Creek, Gashey’s Run (a tributary of Swan Creek) and Deer Creek, are part of the larger Susquehanna River drainage basin. Originally discovered in Swan Creek nymphs. Spawning is assumed to species of darters. Electrotrawling is in 1912, the Maryland darter has not occur during late April, based on other the method of towing a net from a boat been seen here since and only small species, but no Maryland darters have with electrodes attached to the net that numbers of individuals have been been observed during reproduction. send small, harmless pulses through found in Gashey’s Run and Deer the water to stir up fish. Electrofishing Creek. A Rare Species efforts in the Susquehanna are Some biologists suspect that the continuing. Due to its scarcity, the Maryland Maryland darter could be hiding darter was federally listed as in the deep, murky waters of the A lack of adequate surveying of endangered in 1967, and critical Susquehanna River. Others worry large rivers in the past due to limited habitat was designated in 1984. The that the decreased darter population technology leaves hope for finding darter is also state listed. The last is evidence that the desirable habitat Maryland darters in this area. The new known sighting of the darter was in for these fish has diminished, possibly studies would likely provide definitive 1988. due to water quality degradation and information on the population status effects of residential development of the Maryland darter and a basis for Characteristics in the watershed.
  • ANOTHER NEW EUPHYES from the SOUTHERN UNITED STATES COASTAL PLAIN (HESPERIIDAE) the Southern Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains Ar

    ANOTHER NEW EUPHYES from the SOUTHERN UNITED STATES COASTAL PLAIN (HESPERIIDAE) the Southern Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains Ar

    Journal of the Lepidopteri'ts' Society .50(1 ), 1996, 46- 53 ANOTHER NEW EUPHYES FROM THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES COASTAL PLAIN (HESPERIIDAE) JOHN A. SHUEY The Nature ConselVancy, Indiana Field Office, 1330 West 38th Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46208, USA ABSTRACT. The taxon Euphyes dukesi calhouni Shuey, new subspecies endemic to FIOlida, is described. This subspecies is amply differentiated from Euphyes dukesi dukesi and the two taxa are allopatric. In northeaste rn F lorida and sout eastern G eorgia, whe re their known ranges closely approach one another, there is almost no evidence of inte r­ gradation. Euphyes dukesi calhouni is limited to swamp habitats that support large stands of the sedge hostplants, various Rhynchospora and Carex specie:; (Cype raceae). Additional key words: biogeography, we tlands, conservation. The southern Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plains are rich regions for wetland butterflies, especially for genera such as Euphyes, Poanes, and Problema. For example , as currently known, eight named Euphyes spe­ cies or subspecies occur in the wetlands of these coastal plains. Four of these taxa are restricted to the coastal plain: Euphyes palatka palatka (Edwards), Euphyes palatka klotsi Mille r, Harvey and Miller, Euphyes berryi (Bell), and Euphyes bayensis Shuey. Just as interesting as their limited coastal distributions is the presence in these wetland skippers of well differentiated p eripheral populations, many of which have only recently bee n recognized and described. These peripheral populations are most probably the end result of allopatric diffe rentiation. For example, Euphyes palatka klotsi repre sents its spe­ cies on a few of the lower Florida Keys, separated from the nominate mainland subspecies by just tens of miles.
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009

    VGP) Version 2/5/2009

    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
  • Bird Vulnerability Assessments

    Bird Vulnerability Assessments

    Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change, to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia: Bird Vulnerability Assessments Attachment (2) to the Final Report June 2011 Citation: Gonzalez, D., Scott, A. & Miles, M. (2011) Bird vulnerability assessments- Attachment (2) to ‘Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia’. Report prepared for the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board. For further information please contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department of Environment and Natural Resources office. Online information available at: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au Permissive Licence © State of South Australia through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose subject to the conditions that you (1) attribute the Department as the copyright owner of this publication and that (2) you obtain the prior written consent of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources if you wish to modify the work or offer the publication for sale or otherwise use it or any part of it for a commercial purpose. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: Design and Production Manager Department of Environment and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources makes no representations and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this publication.
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes

    Tinamiformes – Falconiformes

    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
  • Endangered Species

    Endangered Species

    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
  • Wet-Mesic Flatwoods Communitywet-Mesic Flatwoods, Abstract Page 1

    Wet-Mesic Flatwoods Communitywet-Mesic Flatwoods, Abstract Page 1

    Wet-mesic Flatwoods CommunityWet-mesic Flatwoods, Abstract Page 1 Historical Range Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Photo by Suzan L. Campbell Overview: Wet-mesic flatwoods is a somewhat Rank Justification: The acreage of wet-mesic poorly drained to poorly drained forest on mineral flatwoods present in Michigan circa 1800 is difficult soils dominated by a mixture of lowland and upland to determine because the community type has hardwoods. The community occurs exclusively on characteristics that overlap those of several of the glacial lakeplain in southeastern Lower Michigan, forest types mapped based on General Land Office where an impermeable clay layer in the soil profile (GLO) survey notes, primarily hardwood swamp and contributes to poor internal drainage. Seasonal beech-sugar maple forest (Comer et al. 1995a, Kost hydrologic fluctuations and windthrow are important et al. 2007). Analysis of GLO survey notes reveals natural disturbances that influence community structure, that lowland forest dominated by hardwoods covered species composition, and successional trajectory of wet- approximately 570,000 ha (1,400,000 ac) of southern mesic flatwoods. Lower Michigan circa 1800 (Comer et al. 1995a). These stands were characterized by mixed hardwoods Global and State Rank: G2G3/S2 (490,000 ha or 1,200,000 ac), black ash (77,000 ha or 190,000 ac), elm (5,300 ha or 13,000 ac), and silver Range: Flatwoods communities characterized by maple-red maple (4,000 ha or 10,000 ac). The majority relatively flat topography, slowly permeable to of lowland forest acreage in southern Lower Michigan impermeable subsurface soil layers, and seasonal was associated with stream and river floodplains, hydrologic fluctuation occur scattered throughout the and is classified as floodplain forest (Tepley et al.
  • South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

    South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

    FOREWORD Abundant fish and wildlife, unbroken coastal vistas, miles of scenic rivers, swamps and mountains open to exploration, and well-tended forests and fields…these resources enhance the quality of life that makes South Carolina a place people want to call home. We know our state’s natural resources are a primary reason that individuals and businesses choose to locate here. They are drawn to the high quality natural resources that South Carolinians love and appreciate. The quality of our state’s natural resources is no accident. It is the result of hard work and sound stewardship on the part of many citizens and agencies. The 20th century brought many changes to South Carolina; some of these changes had devastating results to the land. However, people rose to the challenge of restoring our resources. Over the past several decades, deer, wood duck and wild turkey populations have been restored, striped bass populations have recovered, the bald eagle has returned and more than half a million acres of wildlife habitat has been conserved. We in South Carolina are particularly proud of our accomplishments as we prepare to celebrate, in 2006, the 100th anniversary of game and fish law enforcement and management by the state of South Carolina. Since its inception, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR) has undergone several reorganizations and name changes; however, more has changed in this state than the department’s name. According to the US Census Bureau, the South Carolina’s population has almost doubled since 1950 and the majority of our citizens now live in urban areas.
  • Cherax Albertisii (Blue Tiger Crayfish) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Cherax Albertisii (Blue Tiger Crayfish) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Blue Tiger Crayfish (Cherax albertisii) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, November 2018 Revised, February 2019 Web Version, 3/29/2019 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Chambers (1987): “Freshwater crayfish (Cherax albertisii) […] occur throughout the shallow lakes and rivers of Western Province [Papua New Guinea].” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. There is no indication that this species is in trade in the United States. Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. Remarks GBIF Secretariat (2017) refers to this species as the “Papua blue green crayfish.” 1 From Eprilurahman (2014): “Significant taxonomic disputation and confusion has surrounded the number and identity of species that is referred to as the C. quadricarinatus – C. albertisii complex, which are identifiable on the basis of red soft membraneous outer margin of the propodus of the claw. The earliest taxonomic reviewers of the genus Cherax, (Smith 1912; Calman 1911; and Clark 1936), considered there was no justification in considering C. quadricarinatus, a large freshwater crayfish, described by von Martens (1868) from northern Australia to be taxonomically distinct from C. albertisii described by Nobilli (1899) from southern New Guinea. […] In contrast, Holthuis (1949; 1950; 1982) considered C. quadricarinatus, C. albertisii and C. lorentzi to be taxonomically distinct, with the former species restricted to Australia and the later [sic] two species occurring in New Guinea. My results […] support the recognition of C.
  • Chapter 28: Arthropods

    Chapter 28: Arthropods

    Chapter 28 Organizer Arthropods Refer to pages 4T-5T of the Teacher Guide for an explanation of the National Science Education Standards correlations. Teacher Classroom Resources Activities/FeaturesObjectivesSection MastersSection TransparenciesReproducible Reinforcement and Study Guide, pp. 123-124 L2 Section Focus Transparency 69 L1 ELL Section 28.1 1. Relate the structural and behavioral MiniLab 28-1: Crayfish Characteristics, p. 763 Section 28.1 adaptations of arthropods to their ability Problem-Solving Lab 28-1, p. 766 BioLab and MiniLab Worksheets, p. 125 L2 Basic Concepts Transparency 49 L2 ELL Characteristics of to live in different habitats. Characteristics Content Mastery, pp. 137-138, 140 L1 Reteaching Skills Transparency 41 L1 ELL Arthropods 2. Analyze the adaptations that make of Arthropods P National Science Education arthropods an evolutionarily successful P Standards UCP.1-5; A.1, A.2; phylum. Reinforcement and Study Guide, pp. 125-126 L2 Section Focus Transparency 70 L1 ELLP C.3, C.5, C.6 (1 session, 1/ Section 28.2 2 Concept Mapping, p. 28 P Reteaching Skills Transparency 41 block) L3 ELL L1LS ELL Diversity of Critical Thinking/Problem Solving, p. 28 L3P Reteaching Skills Transparency 42 PL1 ELL Arthropods P LS BioLab and MiniLab Worksheets, pp. 126-128 L2 P LS Section 28.2 3. Compare and contrast the similarities Inside Story: A Spider, p. 769 Laboratory Manual, pp. 199-204P L2 P P LS P and differences among the major groups Inside Story: A Grasshopper, p. 772 Content Mastery, pp. 137, 139-140 L1 P Diversity of of arthropods. MiniLab 28-2: Comparing Patterns of P LS LS Inside Story Poster ELL P LS Arthropods 4.
  • Environmental Assessment in Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Other Relevant Federal and State Laws and Regulations

    Environmental Assessment in Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Other Relevant Federal and State Laws and Regulations

    United States Department of Environmental Agriculture Forest Assessment Service June 2007 Buck Bald Ocoee/Hiwassee and Tellico Ranger Districts, Cherokee National Forest Polk and Monroe Counties, Tennessee For Information Contact: Janan Hay 250 Ranger Station Road Tellico Plains, TN 37385 423-253-8405 southernregion.fs.fed.us/cherokee The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Document Structure .................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Need