DOCSLIB.ORG

The History of the Deportation of Jewish Citizens to Riga in 1941/1942

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The History of the Deportation of Jewish Citizens to Riga in 1941/1942 The History of the Deportation of Jewish citizens to Riga in 1941/1942 By Professor Wolfgang Scheffler Source: http://www.volksbund.de/partner/deutsches-riga-komitee/zur- geschichte-der-deportation/zur-geschichte-der-deportation-englisch.html From November 1941 until the winter of 1942 more than 25,000 Jews – men, women and children – were deported from the territory of the former German Reich as part of the National Socialists‘ “Final Solution to the Jewish Problem” – the code term for the mass murder of the Jewish population in Europe. They were taken away in roughly 28 deportations to the Baltic region, primarily Riga. Only three or four per cent were to survive this inferno. Why were they taken away to the capital of Latvia of all places? In the first half of 1941 it seemed as though a removal of German Jews from the Reich would be postponed until Germany had won the war. It was not until September that Hitler gave his approval for what was at first to be a deportation involving limited numbers. Despite constant efforts by Heydrich to realise this goal, no preparations were made for a geographical solution until September. The city council of Lodz (known then as Litzmannstadt), in whose jurisdiction fell the only large ghetto currently in existence in the sovereign territory of the German Reich, put up a vehement but futile resistance to the requirement to accept 60,000 German Jews into the already overcrowded ghetto. The number had to be reduced to 20,000, but thousands of Sinti and Roma were also sent there. Himmler and Heydrich were aware that other destinations needed to be found. The occupied Soviet territory, in which the action commandos of the Security Police and Security Service, as well as the associations of the Order Police, were already murdering people, therefore became the focal point of the discussions. After some to-ing and fro-ing Minsk and Riga were chosen as future deportation destinations for 50,000 Jews from the territory of the Reich. But here too there were difficulties. The deportations to Minsk had to be called off because of protests by the army due to the onset of the winter catastrophe and the looming defeat outside Moscow. And in Riga there was no room to take anyone, despite the assurances of the commander of action commando A, Dr. Stahlecker. Consequently, the Higher SS and Police Leader of Ostland, Friedrich Jeckeln, ordered that the Riga ghetto be cleared. The ghetto was closed on 25 October 1941. On 30 November, known as Rigaer Blutsonntag or Riga Bloody Sunday, and on 8/9 December, 26,500 Latvian Jews were murdered in the woods of Rumbula by members of the SS and the police as well as Latvian volunteers. Stahlecker forced Latvian Jews from the ghetto to quickly assemble narrow plank beds in the barns and cowsheds of a rundown property near Riga, the Jungfernhof, and “sold“ this to Berlin as a ”barracks camp”. A detention camp that he had long desired, which was by no means ready yet, was also reported as accommodation. As these measures were introduced late, the first five transportations intended for Riga were taken, after several delays, to Kovno. 2,934 people – 1,159 men, 1,600 women and 175 children from Berlin, Munich and Frankfurt am Main – were killed at Fort IX in Kovno on 25 November 1941 by members of action commando 3, the German Order Police and Lithuanian volunteers. On 29 November 1941, 2,000 Jews – 893 men, 1,155 women and 152 children – from Vienna and Wroclaw (known then as Breslau) met a similar fate in Kovno. These executions were the first ever mass shootings of German Jews. The first transportation to come directly to Riga was also caught up in the clearance of the Riga ghetto on 30 November. The passengers, approximately 730 Berlin Jews, who had had to leave their home city on 27 November, died in the early morning of 30 November, immediately before the arrival of their Latvian fellow-sufferers. The fact that the clearance of the Riga ghetto was not yet complete meant that the first four transportations, which arrived in Riga during the first few days of December from Nuremberg, Stuttgart, Vienna and Hamburg, were taken to Jungfernhof. It was not until the arrival of transportation from Cologne, immediately afterwards, that the Jews were taken to the ghetto, where they found the bloody remains of the clearance that had just finished. In December further transportations followed from Kassel, Duesseldorf, Muenster/Bielefeld and Hanover. The deported were accommodated in the homes previously occupied by the murdered Latvian Jews. As most areas of the ghetto that had been cleared of the Latvian Jews were not available to the incoming transportations the homes were painfully cramped, especially as two further transportations from Terezin (known then as Theresienstadt), three from Berlin, two from Vienna, one from Leipzig and one from Dortmund followed during January, up to the beginning of February 1942. Many men from the ghetto and Jungfernhof who were fit for work were taken to the site of the future detention camp in Salaspils, which did not exist yet. They had to build their own accommodation in the ice-cold conditions and then build the entire camp. The transportations to Riga continued until the beginning of February and were not resumed until August. They were then conducted at monthly intervals until December 1942 (transportations from Berlin). One of them was sent on further to Estonia in September 1942 (from Berlin and Frankfurt am Main). The members of the Jewish population in the territory of the Reich had no idea of all these goings-on when they learnt of their imminent deportation to the East. Quite the opposite. They were led to believe that they were going to the newly occupied eastern territories to find accommodation and work to help reconstruct these areas. The deportation guidelines were issued by the Department for Jewish Affairs at the Head Office for Reich Security. The local headquarters of the State Police summarised them for the local area and organised all deportations within their jurisdiction. These headquarters were therefore the place where Jews from the surrounding areas were usually assembled for transportation, so that they could then be sent on their fatal journey in accordance with the agreements with the German National Railway. The local police force accompanied the transportations as far as Riga. For a long time after the war everyone was given the impression that the deportation of the Jews from the Reich had been a kind of “Reich Secret”. However, in the seventies it became totally clear in the courtrooms that this was merely a defence strategy employed by the accused. In actual fact, a great many people in the authorities were aware of the deportation of the German Jews, and the councils were heavily involved. The process was treated as a bureaucratic act by the employment exchanges, industrial firms, tax offices and welfare authorities right through to the courts. The banks issued precise guidelines on how to circumvent the orders given by the Reich Ministry of Finance. The NSGWP and their organisations, predominantly the NS Public Welfare Organisation, auctioned and distributed the possessions of the deported as soon as the tax offices and other authorities had helped themselves to personal effects for their own purposes. Initial uncertainties about handling the official theft of this property were eliminated with the issue of Regulation 11 for the Reich Citizenship Law, which stipulated that a Jew “leaving the Reich” would lose not only his nationality but also his property. The “Reich Association of Jews in Germany” and any existing Jewish municipalities under the guardianship of the Gestapo were also included in the administrative process. They had to compile the deportation lists in accordance with Gestapo guidelines. These lists were then revised and approved by the State Police, who took charge of the people until they were deported. Finally, the Jewish people themselves had to pay for their deportation to death by means of special contributions to the “Special Account W” of the Reich Association. The guidelines stipulated that the people chosen for deportation had to pack only their absolute necessities. This luggage was searched intensively by the Gestapo at the assembly points, as the instructions of the Jewish organisations very frequently differed from those in the Gestapo guidelines and, in any case, the police interpreted the provisions in an arbitrary fashion. At first old passenger trains were prepared for the deportation. In the severe winter of 1941/1942 only unheated goods trains were provided, and this led to numerous transportation passengers freezing to death. The dead had to be unloaded in Riga. The shock at the conditions was immense. On arrival at the goods depot in Riga the passengers were driven from the train with shouting and sometimes violence. Those who could not manage the march on foot to Jungfernhof or the ghetto were taken away by lorry. They were never seen again. The people had to drag themselves along the icy streets to their accommodation. The cruel weather, evil intentions and, it must be stressed, German inability to care for the deported meant that it took days and weeks for the little food then provided to be more or less secured. The appalling accommodation, the cold, the hunger and the resulting illnesses meant that more than 800 people died in the winter months in Jungfernhof alone. In the Riga ghetto, provided that they were fit to work, the Jews who arrived had to clear the snow and were then gradually given jobs in numerous offices and firms.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 20 Dokumentar Stücke Zum Holocaust in Hamburg Von Michael Batz
    „Hört damit auf!“ 20 Dokumentar stücke zum Holocaust in „Hört damit auf!“ „Hört damit auf!“ 20 Dokumentar stücke Hamburg Festsaal mit Blick auf Bahnhof, Wald und uns 20 Dokumentar stücke zum zum Holocaust in Hamburg Das Hamburger Polizei- Bataillon 101 in Polen 1942 – 1944 Betr.: Holocaust in Hamburg Ehem. jüd. Eigentum Die Versteigerungen beweglicher jüdischer von Michael Batz von Michael Batz Habe in Hamburg Pempe, Albine und das ewige Leben der Roma und Sinti Oratorium zum Holocaust am fahrenden Volk Spiegel- Herausgegeben grund und der Weg dorthin Zur Geschichte der Alsterdorfer Anstal- von der Hamburgischen ten 1933 – 1945 Hafenrundfahrt zur Erinnerung Der Hamburger Bürgerschaft Hafen 1933 – 1945 Morgen und Abend der Chinesen Das Schicksal der chinesischen Kolonie in Hamburg 1933 – 1944 Der Hannoversche Bahnhof Zur Geschichte des Hamburger Deportationsbahnhofes am Lohseplatz Hamburg Hongkew Die Emigration Hamburger Juden nach Shanghai Es sollte eigentlich ein Musik-Abend sein Die Kulturabende der jüdischen Hausgemeinschaft Bornstraße 16 Bitte nicht wecken Suizide Hamburger Juden am Vorabend der Deporta- tionen Nach Riga Deportation und Ermordung Hamburger Juden nach und in Lettland 39 Tage Curiohaus Der Prozess der britischen Militärregierung gegen die ehemalige Lagerleitung des KZ Neuengam- me 18. März bis 3. Mai 1946 im Curiohaus Hamburg Sonderbehand- lung nach Abschluss der Akte Die Unterdrückung sogenannter „Ost“- und „Fremdarbeiter“ durch die Hamburger Gestapo Plötzlicher Herztod durch Erschießen NS-Wehrmachtjustiz und Hinrichtungen
    [Show full text]
  • Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland
    Miranda Walston Witnessing Extermination: Using Diaries to Understand the Final Solution in Poland Honours Thesis By: Miranda Walston Supervisor: Dr. Lauren Rossi 1 Miranda Walston Introduction The Holocaust spanned multiple years and states, occurring in both German-occupied countries and those of their collaborators. But in no one state were the actions of the Holocaust felt more intensely than in Poland. It was in Poland that the Nazis constructed and ran their four death camps– Treblinka, Sobibor, Chelmno, and Belzec – and created combination camps that both concentrated people for labour, and exterminated them – Auschwitz and Majdanek.1 Chelmno was the first of the death camps, established in 1941, while Treblinka, Sobibor, and Belzec were created during Operation Reinhard in 1942.2 In Poland, the Nazis concentrated many of the Jews from countries they had conquered during the war. As the major killing centers of the “Final Solution” were located within Poland, when did people in Poland become aware of the level of death and destruction perpetrated by the Nazi regime? While scholars have attributed dates to the “Final Solution,” predominantly starting in 1942, when did the people of Poland notice the shift in the treatment of Jews from relocation towards physical elimination using gas chambers? Or did they remain unaware of such events? To answer these questions, I have researched the writings of various people who were in Poland at the time of the “Final Solution.” I am specifically addressing the information found in diaries and memoirs. Given language barriers, this thesis will focus only on diaries and memoirs that were written in English or later translated and published in English.3 This thesis addresses twenty diaries and memoirs from people who were living in Poland at the time of the “Final Solution.” Most of these diaries (fifteen of twenty) were written by members of the intelligentsia.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Glossary
    Holocaust Glossary A ● Allies: 26 nations led by Great Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union that opposed Germany, Italy, and Japan (known as the Axis powers) in World War II. ● Antisemitism: Hostility toward or hatred of Jews as a religious or ethnic group, often accompanied by social, economic, or political discrimination. (USHMM) ● Appellplatz: German word for the roll call square where prisoners were forced to assemble. (USHMM) ● Arbeit Macht Frei: “Work makes you free” is emblazoned on the gates at Auschwitz and was intended to deceive prisoners about the camp’s function (Holocaust Museum Houston) ● Aryan: Term used in Nazi Germany to refer to non-Jewish and non-Gypsy Caucasians. Northern Europeans with especially “Nordic” features such as blonde hair and blue eyes were considered by so-called race scientists to be the most superior of Aryans, members of a “master race.” (USHMM) ● Auschwitz: The largest Nazi concentration camp/death camp complex, located 37 miles west of Krakow, Poland. The Auschwitz main camp (Auschwitz I) was established in 1940. In 1942, a killing center was established at Auschwitz-Birkenau (Auschwitz II). In 1941, Auschwitz-Monowitz (Auschwitz III) was established as a forced-labor camp. More than 100 subcamps and labor detachments were administratively connected to Auschwitz III. (USHMM) Pictured right: Auschwitz I. B ● Babi Yar: A ravine near Kiev where almost 34,000 Jews were killed by German soldiers in two days in September 1941 (Holocaust Museum Houston) ● Barrack: The building in which camp prisoners lived. The material, size, and conditions of the structures varied from camp to camp.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/30/2021 03:41:48PM Via Free Access 190 BOOK REVIEWS
    LITHUANIAN HISTORICAL STUDIES 21 2017 ISSN 1392-2343 PP. 189–197 Joachim Tauber, Arbeit als Hoffnung. Jüdische Ghettos in Litauen 1941–1944 (Quellen und Darstellungen zur Zeitgeschichte), Herausgegeben vom Institut für Zeitgeschichte, Band 108, Oldenbourg: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2015. 452 p. ISBN 978-3-11-041476-9 Joachim Tauber’s Holocaust research has never been short of relevant and provocative material, 1 and the monograph reviewed here Arbeit als Hoffnung. Jüdische Ghettos in Litauen 1941–1944 is no exception either. The analytical part of the book consists of six chapters: on the course of the establishment of ghettos and the massacre of Jews in Lithuania (until the end of 1941) (pp. 17–111), the ghetto as an economic phenomenon (pp. 113–264), the ghetto as a community of survival and enslavement (pp. 265–326), Lithuanian-Jewish relations (not just in terms of massa- cres, but in the context of the social and economic network of the ghetto labour force) (pp. 327–344), and the impact of the liquidation of ghettos in Lithuania on the system of the exploitation (use) of Jewish workers (pp. 345–376). The sixth chapter summarises the monograph, in which the author reveals specific details about the ghetto labour force in Lithua- nia, basing his arguments on a comparative study of the ghettos in Riga, Bialystok and Belarus (pp. 377–406). The strongest aspect of this monograph is its use of primary sourc- es: archival material, personal documents (journal entries), and memoirs. Archival sources gave the author probably the most opportunities to realise his idea of showing the changes in the situation of the ghettos in 1 Of note are the studies by: J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Linkimer Diary: How 11 Jews Survived the Holocaust
    This is an electronic copy of an essay published in: Margolis, 48R., & Anders, E. (2008). The Linkimer diary: How 11 Jews survivedPētījumi the par Holocaust. holokausta In problēmām A. Caune, Latvijā A. Stranga, & M. Vestermanis, Symposium of the Commission of the HIstorians of Latvia, vol. 23 (pp. 48-68). Riga, Latvia: Institute of Latvian Historians. Available online at: http://www.president.lv/images/modules/items/PDF/item_1790_Vesturnieku_komisijas_raksti_23_sejums.pdf Rebecca Margolis*, Edward Anders** The Linkimer Diary: How 11 Jews Survived the Holocaust Introduction To survive the Holocaust took not one but several miracles. At least one of these miracles usually involved a Gentile Rescuer who, risking his freedom if not his life, stepped forward to save a Jew. One of the most remarkable rescuers in Latvia was the Liepāja janitor Roberts Seduls (1906–1945). An audacious daredevil, he and his wife Johanna (1910–1987) hid 11 Jews in the cellar of an apartment building in the center of town from 1943 to 1945. All survived the war but tragically Seduls did not: he was killed by a Soviet bomb on 10 March 1945. One of the Jews, the teacher Kalman Linkimer (1913–1988), had kept a diary from the first day of the war (22.6.1941) but was forced to abandon it in April 1944 when he fled from the Paplaka military camp to Seduls’ cellar. There he resumed his diary, producing a day-by-day account from 29 April 1944 to 20 February 1945 and reconstructing the lost pages for at least the first, bloodiest year of the German occupation, from 29 June 1941 to the establishment of the Liepāja ghetto on 1 July 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide REFUGE
    A Guide for Educators to the Film REFUGE: Stories of the Selfhelp Home Prepared by Dr. Elliot Lefkovitz This publication was generously funded by the Selfhelp Foundation. © 2013 Bensinger Global Media. All rights reserved. 1 Table of Contents Acknowledgements p. i Introduction to the study guide pp. ii-v Horst Abraham’s story Introduction-Kristallnacht pp. 1-8 Sought Learning Objectives and Key Questions pp. 8-9 Learning Activities pp. 9-10 Enrichment Activities Focusing on Kristallnacht pp. 11-18 Enrichment Activities Focusing on the Response of the Outside World pp. 18-24 and the Shanghai Ghetto Horst Abraham’s Timeline pp. 24-32 Maps-German and Austrian Refugees in Shanghai p. 32 Marietta Ryba’s Story Introduction-The Kindertransport pp. 33-39 Sought Learning Objectives and Key Questions p. 39 Learning Activities pp. 39-40 Enrichment Activities Focusing on Sir Nicholas Winton, Other Holocaust pp. 41-46 Rescuers and Rescue Efforts During the Holocaust Marietta Ryba’s Timeline pp. 46-49 Maps-Kindertransport travel routes p. 49 2 Hannah Messinger’s Story Introduction-Theresienstadt pp. 50-58 Sought Learning Objectives and Key Questions pp. 58-59 Learning Activities pp. 59-62 Enrichment Activities Focusing on The Holocaust in Czechoslovakia pp. 62-64 Hannah Messinger’s Timeline pp. 65-68 Maps-The Holocaust in Bohemia and Moravia p. 68 Edith Stern’s Story Introduction-Auschwitz pp. 69-77 Sought Learning Objectives and Key Questions p. 77 Learning Activities pp. 78-80 Enrichment Activities Focusing on Theresienstadt pp. 80-83 Enrichment Activities Focusing on Auschwitz pp. 83-86 Edith Stern’s Timeline pp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holocaust (Shoah) (1939-1945)
    The Holocaust (Shoah) (1939-1945) This essay is not meant to be comprehensive. Rather, this is a narrative summary of my presentation. Holocaust historian Karl Schleunes wrote about the “Twisted Road to Auschwitz” that explored how the Nazis ended up building camps of mass murder. It is a useful description as it allows us to blend together some of the myriad forces acting together to create a “perfect storm.” As survivor Emil Fackenheim writes, “The murder camp was not an accidental by-product of the Nazi empire. It was its essence.” Nazi Germany was on a trajectory of mass murder and atrocity from its onset. The unfolding of genocides in Europe is a complex phenomenon, but for our purposes we will focus on: Nazi “ideology” and the bureaucratic, competitive, feudal nature of the Nazi state; process and innovation; Hitler’s function as leader and individual initiatives of “working towards the Führer”; the influence of the unfolding wartime situation; and the influence of location, specifically Eastern Europe. Ideology is not something that can be imposed “from the top.” Rather, ideology is a packaged expression of cultural symbols, desires, and perspectives that “make sense” to a public at large. Holocaust historian Doris Bergen sums up Nazi ideology with the phrase, “Race and Space.” Nazism was rooted in racial theory that had become popular within professional circles by the turn of the twentieth century. For the Nazis, “racial” survivor was predicated on a social Darwinist view of natural competition and survival. Not only was it necessary to weed out “threatening” gene pools from the “Aryan” it was also necessary for the “Aryan” to find living space or lebensraum.
    [Show full text]
  • USHMM Finding
    http://collections.ushmm.org Contact [email protected] for further information about this collection RG-18.002M United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Archives Finding Aid RG-18 Latvia Updated in Feb. 2010 Finding aid to microfilm reels 1-33 RG-18.002M Acc. 1992.A.080 Title: Latvian Central State Historical Archive (Riga) records, 1941-1945. Extent: 39 microfilm reels ; 35 mm. Provenance: The Generalkommissariat in Rīga, the Reichskommissariat für das Ostland, the Latvian Legion, the Wehrmachtsbefehlhaber Ostland, and other occupation and collaboration agencies in occupied Latvia created the records during World War II. The Soviet (Red Army) captured the records at the end of the war and later deposited them in the Latvian Central State Historical Archive in Rīga, Latvia. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum received selected files from the archives in Rīga in 1992, and additional records in 2009, and 2010.. Restriction on access: No restrictions on access. Restriction on use: Restrictions on use apply. See cooperative agreement with the Central State Historical Archive, Riga. Organization and Arrangement: Arrangement is thematic. Language: German, Latvian Preferred Citation: Standard citation for United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Collections Division, Archives Branch. Scope and Content: Contains information about concentration of Latvian Jews; persecution of Jews and Gypsies; confiscation of Jewish property; activities of partisans; collaboration of Latvians; activities of various police forces; and the ghettos in Riga, Liebau, and nearby localities Inventory: *Note: Reels 1-9 are catalogued in the Minaret cataloging system. Reel 1: 1. Food rations for persons in prisons and concentration camps (R30-4-5) RG-18.002M Latvian Central State Historical Archive (Riga) records, 1941-1945.
    [Show full text]
  • USHMM Finding
    - https://collections.ushmm.org Contact [email protected] for further information about this collection Holocaust Survivor Questions to Consider Questions to Consider Hannah Lenschitzki Rath When Viewing Video Filmed on April 14, 2005 1. Who was in Hannah’s family? Who died? Who survived? 2. Why did Hannah go to live with her grandfather in Hanover? 3. What happened on Kristallnacht? 4. What did Hannah and her mother fi nd when they arrived in the ghetto in Riga, Latvia? 5. What was life like for Hannah in the Riga ghetto? 6. What was the importance of Hannah’s friendship with the other girl? How did they help each other survive? 7. What work did Hannah do in the concentration camp? How did this work benefi t her? 8. How did the prisoners observe the Jewish holidays? What is the message of faith from this oral history? 9. What happened to Hannah after liberation? She and her friend were free, but what problems did they encounter? “I never lost my faith.” 10. What lessons does Hannah want you to remember from her talk? - Hannah Rath Face to Face A Holocaust Education Program at Congregation Shaarey Tikvah Beachwood, Ohio https://collections.ushmm.org Contact [email protected] for further information about this collection Hannah Lenschitzki Rath was born in 1922 and raised in killed and buried in mass graves. The German Jews were Halberstadt, Germany, a small town with a small, strictly housed in the homes of these people, with the clothing observant Jewish population. Her parents kept a kosher and possessions of the previous owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Reichskommissariat Ostland from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Reichskommissariat Ostland From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "Ostland" redirects here. For the province of the Empire in Warhammer 40,000, see Ostland (Warhammer). Navigation Reichskommissariat Ostland (RKO) was the civilian occupation regime established by Main page Germany in the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), the north-eastern part of Reichskommissariat Ostland Contents Poland and the west part of the Belarusian SSR during World War II. It was also known Reichskommissariat of Germany Featured content [1] initially as Reichskommissariat Baltenland ("Baltic Land"). The political organization Current events ← → for this territory—after an initial period of military administration before its establishment— 1941–1945 Random article was that of a German civilian administration, nominally under the authority of the Reich Donate to Wikipedia Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories (German: Reichsministerium für die besetzten Ostgebiete) led by Nazi ideologist Alfred Rosenberg, but was in reality Interaction controlled by the Nazi official Hinrich Lohse, its appointed Reichskommissar. Help The main political objective, which the ministry laid out in the framework of National Flag Emblem About Wikipedia Socialist policies for the east established by Adolf Hitler, were the complete annihilation Community portal of the Jewish population and the settlement of ethnic Germans along with the expulsion or Recent changes Germanization of parts of the native population
    [Show full text]
  • The Holocaust in Latvia
    Contents GLOSSARY xiii PREFACE xv INTRODUCTION 1 Changing Interpretations: The Abwehr. The Wehrmacht. The School of the 1970s. The Three "Truths" of Jeckeln. Historiography: Jewish Survivors. German Works. Latvians in Emigration. Soviet Writings. Witnesses. Who Killed the Jews of Latvia? Spontaneity Versus Orders. The Causes of Latvian Participation: Propaganda. Higher Orders. Numbers of Latvian Participants. The Latvian Guilt: Criminal Guilt. Political Guilt. Moral and Metaphysical Guilt. I. THE HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL CONTEXT 35 Historical Background. Latvia in July 1941: The Partisans and Self-Defense Forces. Military and Paramilitary Units: The Latvian Voluntary SS Legion. Schutzmannschaften. Social Elites and Sub-groups: Ulmaniesi. Kalpakiesi. Valdmaniesi. Aizsargi. Officers. Perkonkrustiesi. Korporeji. Intellectuals. Relatives of the Deported. Repatrianti. German Jewish Policy: Himmler-Heydrich Plans. Latvian Role in the Killings. Names and Uniforms. II. THE JEWS OF LATVIA 58 The Rise and Fall of the Jewish Population. Latvian- Jewish Relations to 1914: Latvian Notice of the Jewish Presence before 1914. The 1905 Revolution. The Jews in Independent Latvia. The Ulmanis Regime. Jews Under the First Soviet Occupation. III. ANTI-SEMITISM 79 Perkonkrusts. Nazi Anti-Semitism: General Anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism and the State of Latvia. Anti-Semitism in Latvian Culture. The Ultimate Anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism and the Killing of the Jews. Anti-Semitism and the Latvian Participation in the Killings. The Jewish-Bolshevik Nexus. June 17, 1940. Deportations of June 14, 1941. Causes of Collaboration. IV. NAZI GOALS AND POLICIES 116 Nazi Imperatives. Racial Attitudes. The Search for Latvian Collaborators: The Abwehr Episode. The Security Police and the SD. The Ministry of the East. Latvians and Weapons in 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • "Reichskristallnacht" in Schleswig-Holstein
    Die „Reichskristallnacht“ in Schleswig-Holstein Der Novemberpogrom im historischen Kontext Veröffentlichungen des Landesarchivs Schleswig-Holstein Band 109 Die „Reichskristallnacht“ in Schleswig-Holstein Der Novemberpogrom im historischen Kontext Herausgegeben von Rainer Hering Hamburg University Press Verlag der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky Impressum Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. Die Online-Version dieser Publikation ist auf den Verlagswebseiten frei verfügbar (Open Access). Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek hat die Netzpublikation archiviert. Diese ist dauerhaft auf dem Archivserver der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek verfügbar: Archivserver der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek – https://portal.dnb.de/ Hamburg University Press – http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/purl/HamburgUP_LASH109_Pogromnacht ISBN 978-3-943423-30-3 (Print) ISSN 1864-9912 (Print) © 2016 Hamburg University Press, Verlag der Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky, Deutschland Produktion: Elbe-Werkstätten GmbH, Hamburg, Deutschland http://www.elbe-werkstaetten.de/ Covergestaltung: nach einem Entwurf von Atelier Bokelmann, Schleswig Inhaltsverzeichnis Rainer Hering Einleitung ...........................................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]