Measures to Enhance the Dynamic Performance of Railway Catenaries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Measures to Enhance the Dynamic Performance of Railway Catenaries Measures to Enhance the Dynamic Performance of Railway Catenaries Zhendong Liu Doctoral Thesis in Vehicle and Maritime Engineering KTH Royal Institute of Technology TRITA-AVE 2017:60 School of Engineering Sciences ISSN 1651-7660 Dep. of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering ISBN 978-91-7729-524-2 Teknikringen 8C, SE-100 44 Stockholm, SWEDEN 2017 Academic thesis with permission by KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, to be submitted for public examination for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Engineering in Vehicle and Maritime Engineering, Wednesday the 18th of October, 2017 at 10:00 am in the room F3, Lindstedtsvägen 26, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. TRITA-AVE 2017:60 ISSN 1651-7660 ISBN 978-91-7729-524-2 Zhendong Liu, June 2017 ii Preface The work presented in this thesis was performed between September 2013 and June 2017 at the Department of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden. It was mainly supported by KTH Royal Institute of Technology and China Scholarship Council, and partly by Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket), Bombardier Transportation and Schunk group. I would like to thank my main supervisor Prof. Sebastian Stichel in particular for guiding and inspiring me to explore the unknown world. I would like to give special thanks to my co-supervisors, Dr. Per-Anders Jönsson and Prof. Anders Rønnquist, for sharing their knowledge with me and helping me to solve every problem during my study. In addition, I appreciate Prof. Mats Berg for his kind help on every aspect during my PhD study. I am grateful for the support from all other colleges in our unit: Carlos, Alireza, Saeed, Tomas, Yuyi, Weiyuan, Visakh as well as all the former colleges at the unit. I also give my thanks to Leping Feng and Petter Nåvik for helpful and fruitful discussions. In addition, I would like to thank the small Chinese community at my department at KTH and all my former colleges in China Academy of Railway Sciences. In the end, I want to show my most heartfelt gratitude to my parents and my wife, for their encouragements and support in the past years. Stockholm, June 2017 Zhendong LIU iii “滴水之恩,涌泉相报” iv Abstract The pantograph-catenary system is used in railways to transfer electric power from the stationary infrastructure to the moving trainset. As the pantograph slides against the catenary, the contact between the two surfaces is not stable due to stiffness variation, propagating wave and other environmental perturbation, especially at high speeds or in multi-pantograph operation. Heavy oscillation can result in poor power-transmission quality, electromagnetic interference, severe wear or even structural damage. Therefore, the pantograph-catenary dynamics has become one of the key issues which limits the maximum operational speed and determines the maintenance cost. There are many types of catenary systems developed in Sweden, which are relatively soft and sensitive compared with the systems used in other countries. They work well at low operational speed and have strict limitations to multi- pantograph operation. Although it is possible to achieve an operational speed of 350 km/h on newly-built high-speed lines, there is still a large demand for higher operational speed and more capacity on the existing lines. Many researchers and engineers have made progress to improve the dynamic performance of pantograph-catenary systems. From the research aspect, many numerical models have been built up to better demonstrate the dynamics of the pantograph-catenary system and to unveil the key influencing factors. There have also been many engineering applications developed in recent years. From the catenary aspect, high-tensile loads on the catenary and low-stiffness- variation designs are widely used to improve the dynamic performance. From the pantograph aspect, aerodynamic-friendly designs and active-control technique contribute to the development of high-speed pantograph. All these methods to upgrade the existing systems need not only large investment but also long suspension of the service. Considering the large scale and the heavy service duty of the existing railway lines, it becomes almost impossible to completely upgrade the existing pantograph-catenary systems. Therefore, it is necessary to find practical and efficient methods to exploit the potentials of the existing systems to enhance their dynamic performances. In response, this thesis investigates the dynamic behaviour of the existing Swedish pantograph-catenary systems and proposes methods for better usage of the existing systems. A numerical study on multi-pantograph operation is performed and the relationships between dynamic performance and some key parameters are established. By studying the multi- pantograph operation at short spacing distance between pantographs, a method to use the leading pantograph as auxiliary pantograph is proposed aiming to increase the operational speed on the soft catenary system. To ensure operational safety in abnormal conditions, numerical studies on pantograph raising/lowering processes and in catenary overlap sections are performed. By studying the influence of the catenary lumped-mass on the dynamic performance, it shows that it is not necessary to avoid the lumped-masses on the catenary. It is even possible to implement some artificial tuned-masses on the catenary for dynamic optimization. v Keywords: numerical study, pantograph-catenary interaction, soft catenary system, multi- pantograph operation, auxiliary-pantograph operation, tuned-mass application. vi Sammanfattning Strömavtagare och kontaktledning används i järnväg för att överföra elkraft från den stationära infrastrukturen till det rörliga tågsättet. Eftersom strömavtagaren glider mot kontaktledningen är kontakten mellan de två ytorna inte stabil på grund av att kontaktkrafterna varierar och kan även gå ner till noll, dvs. Strömavtagaren tappar kontakt med kontaktledningen. Anledningen till dessa variationer är styvhetsvariationer, svängning på kontaktledningen och annan miljöinflytande, särskilt vid höga hastigheter eller vid drift med flera strömavtagare på samma tågsätt. Kraftiga variationer i kontaktkraften kan leda till dålig effektöverföringskvalitet, elektromagnetisk störning, svårt slitage eller till och med strukturell skada. Därför har strömavtagare-kontaktledningssystemet blivit en av de viktigaste frågorna som begränsar maximal driftshastighet och bestämmer underhållskostnaden. Det finns många typer av kontaktledningssystem i Sverige som är mjukare och känsligare än som de används i andra länder. De har låg tillåten hastighet och strikt begränsning vad gäller fler-strömavtagardrift. Trots att det är möjligt att uppnå en driftshastighet på 350 km/h på nybyggda höghastighetslinjer, är det ocskå stor efterfrågan på högre hastighet och kapacitet på befintliga banor. Många forskare och ingenjörer har gjort framsteg för att förbättra den dynamiska prestandan hos strömavtagare-kontaktledningssystemen. På forskningssidan har många numeriska modeller byggts upp för att bättre visa den dynamiska interaktionen av strömavtagare- kontaktledningssystemet och avslöja de viktigaste påverkningsfaktorerna. Det finns också många tekniska applikationer utvecklade de senaste åren. Vad gäller kontaktledningen används i stor utsträckning höga dragbelastningar och lågstyvhetsvariationer för att förbättra den dynamiska prestandan. Från strömavtagarens aspekt bidrar aerodynamisk optimering och aktiv reglerteknik till utvecklingen av höghastighetsströmavtagare. Alla metoder för att uppgradera de befintliga systemen behöver inte bara stora investeringar utan också långa trafikavbrott. Med tanke på det stora järnvägsnätet och den befintliga transportvolymen blir det nästan omöjligt att helt uppgradera befintliga strömavtagare-kontaktledningssystem. Därför är det nödvändigt att ta reda på praktiska och effektiva metoder för att förbättra operativiteten och utforska potentialen i de befintliga systemen. Som svar undersöker denna avhandling de dynamiska beteenden hos befintliga strömavtagare-kontaktledningssystem och föreslår metoder för bättre användning av befintliga system. En numerisk studie om multi-strömavtagardrift utförs och förhållandet mellan dynamisk prestanda och några nyckelparametrar undersöks. Efter att ha studerad fler- strömavtagarsdrift med kort avstånd mellan strömavtagare, föreslås en metod för att använda den ledande strömavtagaren som hjälpströmavtagare för att öka driftshastigheten på det mjuka kontaktledningsystemet. För att säkerställa driftssäkerheten vid onormala förhållanden, utförs numeriska studier på höjnings- och sänkningsoperationen av strömavtagare och i överlappningen av kontaktledningssektioner. Genom att studera inverkan av punkt-massor på den dynamiska prestandan visar det sig att det inte är nödvändigt att alltid undvika den massan vii på kontaktledningsystemet och det är möjligt att använda vissa konstgjorda massor på kontaktledningsystemet för att optimera det dynamiska beteendet. Nyckelord: numerisk studie, strömavtagare-kontaktledningssystem, fler-strömavtagardrift, mjukt kontaktledningssystem, extraströmavtagare, avstämt massystem. viii Dissertation This thesis consists of a summary of the present work and a collection of the following appended papers: Paper A Zhendong Liu, Per-Anders Jönsson, Sebastian Stichel and Anders Rønnquist, ‘Implication of multiple pantograph operation on soft catenary systems in Sweden’, IMechE Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit,
Recommended publications
  • TCRP Report 7: Reducing the Visual Impact of Overhead Contact Systems
    T RANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Report 7 Reducing the Visual Impact of Overhead Contact Systems Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1995 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIR ROD J. DIRIDON OFFICERS Int'l Institute for Surface Transportation Chair: Lillian C. Borrone, Director, Port Commerce Dept., The Port Authority of New York and New Policy Study Jersey MEMBERS Vice Chair: James W. VAN Loben Sels, Director, California Department of Transportation SHARON D. BANKS Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board AC Transit LEE BARNES MEMBERS Barwood, Inc. GERALD L. BLAIR EDWARD H. ARNOLD, Chair and President, Arnold Industries, Lebanon, PA Indiana County Transit Authority SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, AC Transit, Oakland, CA MICHAEL BOLTON BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor & Chair, Bruton Center for Development Capital Metro Studies, The University of Texas at Dallas SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO DWIGHT M. BOWER, Director, Idaho Department of Transportation New Jersey Transit Corporation JOHN E. BREEN, The Nasser I. Al-Rashid Chair in Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at SANDRA DRAGGOO Austin CATA WILLIAM F. BUNDY, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, Washington, DC A. RAY CHAMBERLAIN, Vice President, Freight Policy, American Trucking Associations, Inc., SEPTA Alexandria, VA (Past Chair, 1993) DELON HAMPTON RAY W. CLOUGH, Nishkian Professor of Structural Engineering, Emeritus, University of California, Delon Hampton & Associates Berkeley RICHARD R. KELLY JAMES C. DELONG, Director of Aviation, Denver International Airport, Denver, CO Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • TCQSM Part 8
    Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual—2nd Edition PART 8 GLOSSARY This part of the manual presents definitions for the various transit terms discussed and referenced in the manual. Other important terms related to transit planning and operations are included so that this glossary can serve as a readily accessible and easily updated resource for transit applications beyond the evaluation of transit capacity and quality of service. As a result, this glossary includes local definitions and local terminology, even when these may be inconsistent with formal usage in the manual. Many systems have their own specific, historically derived, terminology: a motorman and guard on one system can be an operator and conductor on another. Modal definitions can be confusing. What is clearly light rail by definition may be termed streetcar, semi-metro, or rapid transit in a specific city. It is recommended that in these cases local usage should prevail. AADT — annual average daily ATP — automatic train protection. AADT—accessibility, transit traffic; see traffic, annual average ATS — automatic train supervision; daily. automatic train stop system. AAR — Association of ATU — Amalgamated Transit Union; see American Railroads; see union, transit. Aorganizations, Association of American Railroads. AVL — automatic vehicle location system. AASHTO — American Association of State AW0, AW1, AW2, AW3 — see car, weight Highway and Transportation Officials; see designations. organizations, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. absolute block — see block, absolute. AAWDT — annual average weekday traffic; absolute permissive block — see block, see traffic, annual average weekday. absolute permissive. ABS — automatic block signal; see control acceleration — increase in velocity per unit system, automatic block signal.
    [Show full text]
  • Overhead Electric Line Construction STATE of CALIFORNIA ______RULES
    Overhead Electric Line Construction STATE OF CALIFORNIA _____________ RULES FOR Overhead Electric Line Construction Prescribed by the PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTENTS Contents Introductory Page Contents i List of Tables iii Change List v Preface ix Decision No 34884, Case No. 4324 (Ordering Adoption of General Order No. 95) xi Sections Page I. General Provisions I-1 II. Definition of Terms as Used in the Rules of This Order II-1 III. Requirements for All Lines III-1 IV. Strength Requirements for All Classes of Lines IV-1 V. Detailed Construction Requirements for Supply Lines (Class H, L and T Circuits) V-1 VI. Detailed Construction Requirements for Tower Lines and Extra High Voltage Lines (Class E Circuits) VI-1 VII. Detailed Construction Requirements for Trolley and Electric Railway Contact and Feeder Conductors and Their Supporting Messengers, Span Wires, Etc. (Class T Circuits) VII-1 VIII. Detailed Construction Requirements for Communication Lines (Class C Circuits) VIII-1 IX. Joint Poles or Poles Jointly Used IX-1 X. Supply and Communication Lines in Line Crossings or Conflicts X-1 XI. Supply Lines or Communication Lines Crossing Over Railroads XI-1 Appendices Page CONTENTS Appendix A Loading Districts A-1 Appendix B Mechanical and Loading Data for Conductors B-1 Appendix C Conductor Sags C-1 Appendix D Typical Communication Line Construction D-1 Appendix E Clearance of Poles, Towers and Structures from Railroad Tracks E-1 Guidelines to Rule 35 E-2 Appendix F Typical Problems F-1 Appendix G Typical Illustrative Diagrams of Rules G-1 ________________________________________________________________________ Index ________________________________________________________________________ Overhead Electric Line Construction GENERAL ORDER No.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolley Bus Passengers' Protection Against Accidental Electrocution
    Safety and Security Engineering III 585 Trolley bus passengers’ protection against accidental electrocution I. Străinescu, V. Rădulescu, E. Tudor & C. Unguraşu ICPE SAERP S.A., Bucharest, Romania Abstract Assuring proper safety measures for all the passengers using the trolley, especially in the case of dangerous voltages, should be one of the most important issues to be taken into consideration. The method and the device that detects dangerous voltages that may appear between the body of the trolley and the road surface must be used on all types of trolleys that are supplied from a non-insulated network. The trolleys must be equipped with conducting bands or metallic cables – usually mounted close to the access doors – which collect the road potential. The device is supposed to monitor the potential difference between the body of the trolley and the road and detect two levels of dangerous voltage: the warning level, when the voltage is approximately 20V, and the disconnection level, when the voltage is over 40V, the case in which the main contactor is opened and the supply trolleys are lowered. Keywords: trolley, danger, detection, potential. 1 Introduction The risk of electrocution appears when the electrical insulation of the apparatus is broken and, during the entry of passengers, one of them is in touch with a conducting part of the trolley with his feet still on the ground. The dangerous voltage from which electrocution can appear is higher than 70V, but the protection level is stated at a maximum value of 40V. The possible voltage of the trolley body can be up to 750 Vdc, much higher than the upper limit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Feasibility of a Single-Track Vintage Trolley in the Midtown Greenway
    THE FEASIBILITY OF A SINGLE-TRACK VINTAGE TROLLEY IN THE MIDTOWN GREENWAY By Lomarado Group March 19, 2001 Presented to the CREDITS The Midtown Greenway Coalition thanks the following neighborhoods, individuals, foundations, and corporations for assisting with and contributing to this study. Neighborhood Organizations Funding This Study Calhoun Area Residents Action Group Cedar Isles Dean Neighborhood Association Corcoran Neighborhood Organization East Calhoun Community Organization (pending) East Isles Residents Association Longfellow Community Council Lowry Hill East Neighborhood Association Lyndale Neighborhood Association Powderhorn Park Neighborhood Association Seward Neighborhood Group Individuals Funding This Study Terry & Kevin Barnes Henry Hubben Bob Olson Elizabeth Brackett and Fred Olson Scott Likely Will Owens Darryl Carter Ranki Lyders Beth Parkhill & Bob Corrick Brad & Laurie Frederiksen Marie Markoe Zinta Pone Kathy & John Hendricks Margaret McGlynn Bob Sorenson Tom Hockenberry Midtown Greenway Coalition Transit Committee Bob Corrick Ron Fergle George Puzak John DeWitt Henry Hubben John Walley Cover Photograph Assistance with Trolley Tidbits Patrick Fox Photography Russell Olson, author of Electric Railways of Minnesota Foundations and Corporations Providing General Operating and Organizational Support for the Midtown Greenway Coalition in 2000 and 2001 Elmer & Eleanor Anderson Foundation The Minneapolis Foundation Marbrook Foundation Reliant Energy Minnegasco McKnight Foundation US Bank This report is printed on 100% recycled
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion of Overhead Contact Systems Poles to Pantographs
    Conversion of Overhead Contact Systems Poles to Pantographs Luigi Di Michele, C.E.T. Peter Hrovat, P. Eng. Toronto Transit Commission Toronto Transit Commission Toronto, Ontario, Canada Toronto, Ontario, Canada Richard J. Vella, Bsc. EE. Paul F. White Toronto Transit Commission HNTB Corporation Toronto, Ontario, Canada Chelmsford, MA USA INTRODUCTION design a new streetcar in 1972. In August of 1973, TTC placed an initial order for 200 new vehicles from OTDC, The Toronto Transit commission (TTC) has a total ten prototypes of which would be designed and built by a streetcar track mileage of 81 km [51 miles], over 100 manufacturer in Switzerland called Schweizerische complex intersections and has operated streetcars with Industrie Gesellschaftbefore (SIG).The order for 10 Swiss trolley pole current collectors since it began operating in CLRV models was cut back to six in the late 1970’s to 1921. Prior Companies had used pole operation since the provide parts needed to build an experimental articulated inception of electric streetcar in August of 1892. The version of the design but only one articulated prototype more recent PCC cars used trolley poles and the overhead was built. In the meantime, the new SIG cars started to remained compatible for trolley poles. The replacement arrive in 1977 and 1978 with the UTDC cars starting in vehicles to the PCC car, known as the Canadian Light 1979. Revenue service started in September of that year. Rail Vehicle (CLRV) manufactured by Hawker-Siddeley In 1988 the first of 52 ALRV’s was entered into revenue at Thunder Bay Ontario, were equipped with trolley pole service.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction and Electrification of Trolley Track
    Final Report Reconstruction and Electrification of Trolley Track City of Kingston M ay 2008 This document was prepared for the ew York State Department of State with funds provided under Title II of the Environmental Protection Fund. RECONSTRUCTION AND ELECTRIFICATION OF TROLLEY TRACK I Executive Summary ………………………………………………………………………………1 II Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..... 5 Scope of work ……………………………………………………………………………….5 Special Considerations……………………………………………………………………..6 Utility Concerns ……………………………………………………………………..6 Environmental Considerations …………………………………………………….6 III Evaluation of Existing Infrastructure …………………………………………………………..7 Field Survey – Track and Rights-of-way …………………………………………………7 Analysis of Existing Rail Infrastructure Condition ……………………………….7 Primary Track Study Area: Kingston Point Line & West Strand Line …7 Overall Track Conditions …………………………………………..8 West Strand Line State of Existing Track ………………………10 Kingston Point Line State of Existing Track ……………………11 Areas of Concern ………………………………………………….11 Secondary Study Area: Brickyard and Kingston City Lines …………..12 Kingston City Line Extents ...……………………………………..12 Brickyard Line Extents ……………………………………………12 Existing Conditions – Secondary Track Study Subject Areas in General……… ………………………………………………….13 Existing Conditions – Kingston City Line ……………………….13 Existing Conditions – Brickyard Line ……………………………15 Areas of Concern ………………………………………………….15 Kingston City Line …………………………………………15 Brickyard Line to Hudson’s Landing …………………….15 Field Survey Streetcars …………………………………………………………………..18
    [Show full text]
  • King County Trolley Bus Evaluation
    KING COUNTY TROLLEY BUS EVALUATION MAY 2011 King County Trolley Bus Evaluation May 2011 Prepared by: P LTK Eneeri Sices Contents 1. Executive Summary .............................................. 1-1 2. Introduction ......................................................... 2-1 3. Bus Technology and Vehicle System Assessment .......................................................... 3-1 4. Life-Cycle Cost Comparison ................................... 4-1 5. Environmental Comparison .................................. 5-1 6. Auxiliary Power Unit Evaluation ........................... 6-1 7. Federal Funding Sources....................................... 7-1 8. Conclusions .......................................................... 8-1 i | King County Metro Trolley Bus Evaluation Study Exhibits Exhibit 1-1. Trolley Bus Service Area in Seattle ............ 1-1 Exhibit 4-8. Total Maintenance Costs Applied to Exhibit 6-1. Representative APUs ................................ 6-3 Exhibit 1-2. Environmental Impacts and Benefits the Life-Cycle Cost Analysis ................................ 4-12 Exhibit 6-2. Comparison of APU Off-Wire Summary ............................................................. 1-3 Exhibit 4-9. TOH System Maintenance Costs Capabilities .......................................................... 6-5 Exhibit 1-3. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Summary............. 1-4 Applied to the Life-Cycle Cost Analysis ............... 4-14 Exhibit 6-3. Estimate of Life-Cycle Costs for Battery Exhibit 1-4. Fixed Guideway Funding Influence on Exhibit
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum Overhead Conductor Rail D2 ‐ Subway
    Technical Memorandum Overhead Conductor Rail D2 ‐ Subway Dallas, Texas December 30, 2019 This Report was Prepared for DART General Planning Consultant Six Managed by HDR Document Revision Record Technical Memorandum – Overhead Conductor HDR Report Number: Click here to enter text. Rail Project Manager: Tom Shelton PIC: Tom Shelton Revision Number: A Date: 12/30/2019 Version 1 Date: Click here to enter text. Version 2 Date: Click here to enter text. Originator Name: Michael Suchecki, EIT Firm: HNTB Title: Project Manager, Overhead Contact Date: December 30, 2019 Systems Commentors Name: Click here to enter text. Firm: Click here to enter text. Date: Click here to enter text. Approval Task Manager: Click here to enter text. Date: Click here to enter text. Verified/Approved By: Click here to enter text. Date: Click here to enter text. Distribution Name: Tom Shelton Title: PIC Firm: HNTB Name: Ernie Martinez Title: Project Manager Agency: DART ii Table of Contents Narrative ........................................................................................................................................ 4 What is Overhead Conductor Rail? ............................................................................................... 4 Availability and Usage ................................................................................................................... 5 Applications ................................................................................................................................... 5 Tunnels ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE 19 Current Collection Systems
    LECTURE 19 Current collection systems CUURENT COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1. OVERHEAD EQUIPMENT: The primary requirement of a collector is that it should maintain a continuous contact with trolley – wire at all speeds. The three types of commonly used are: Trolley collector Bow collector Pantograph collector TROLLEY COLLECTOR: A trolley collector is used on tramways and trolley-buses and is mounted on the roof of the vehicle. A contact with the overhead wire is made by means of either a grooved wheel or a sliding shoe carried at the end of a light trolley pole attached to the top of the vehicle and held in contact with overhead wire by means of a spring. The pole is hinged to a swivelling base so that it may be reversed for reverse running thereby making it unnecessary for the trolley wire to be accurately maintained above the centre of the track. Trolley collectors always operate in the trailing position. The trolley collector is employed upto speeds of about 32km/h as beyond this speed there is every possibility of the wheel jumping off the trolley wire. BOW COLLECTOR It consists of a light metal strip or bow (about 1 m long) pressing against the trolley wire for collection of current and the framework is mounted on the roof of the car. The strip is purposely made of soft material in order that most of the wear may occur on it rather than on the trolley wire. There is no possibility of the strip jumping off the trolley wire. A bow collector also operates in trailing position; hence it requires provision of either duplicate bows or an arrangement for reversing the bow for running in the reverse direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrification and the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad
    University of Missouri, St. Louis IRL @ UMSL Theses Graduate Works 11-20-2009 Unfulfilled Promise: Electrification and the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad Adam T. Michalski University of Missouri-St. Louis, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis Recommended Citation Michalski, Adam T., "Unfulfilled Promise: Electrification and the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad" (2009). Theses. 181. http://irl.umsl.edu/thesis/181 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Works at IRL @ UMSL. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of IRL @ UMSL. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Unfulfilled Promise: Electrification and the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad by Adam T. Michalski B. S., Urban Studies, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, 2004 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Missouri – St. Louis In partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History December 2009 Advisory Committee Carlos A. Schwantes, Ph. D. Chairperson Daniel L. Rust, Ph. D. Kevin J. Fernlund, Ph. D. Michalski Adam, 2009, UMSL, p. ii Copyright © 2009 by Adam T. Michalski All Rights Reserved Michalski Adam, 2009, UMSL, p. iii CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS iv GLOSSARY v Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. THE PROMISE OF ELECTRICITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE 5 3. EARLY ELECTRIFICATION OF STEAM RAILROADS 26 4. THE MILWAUKEE ELECTRIFICATION 50 5. THE MILWAUKEE ELECTRIFICATION’S BENEFITS AND DRAWBACKS
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Assessment of Eugene Street Railway Remains on Willamette Street, Eugene, Lane County, Oregon
    AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF EUGENE STREET RAILWAY REMAINS ON WILLAMETTE STREET, EUGENE, LANE COUNTY, OREGON Rick Minor HERITAGE RESEARCH ASSOCIATES REPORT NO. 384 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF EUGENE STREET RAILWAY REMAINS ON WILLAMETTE STREET, EUGENE, LANE COUNTY, OREGON by Rick Minor Submitted to City of Eugene Public Works/Engineering 99 E. Broadway, Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401 Heritage Research Associates, Inc. 1997 Garden Avenue Eugene, OR 97403 February 28, 2014 Heritage Research Associates Report No. 384 SHPO REPORTING DATA Findings: + Site No. 35LA1590 County: Lane T/R/S 18S, 3W, Section 6 USGS quad: Eugene, Oreg. 7.5ʹ Project Area: 1.3 acres Area Monitored: 0.5 acres Project Type: Monitoring, Recovery, and Documentation Report Title: An Archaeological Assessment of Urban Railway Remains on Willamette Street, Eugene, Lane County, Oregon. Heritage Research Associates Report No. 384 Authors: Rick Minor Client: City of Eugene (Public Works/Engineering) Consultant: Heritage Research Associates, Inc. Permit No.: AP-1818 Collections: Report, fieldnotes, and photographs at Oregon State Museum of Anthropology, University of Oregon (Accession No. 2178). Samples of rails donated to Lane County Historical Museum. Additional rail samples and railroad artifacts may be donated to historic railroad museums in Oregon. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY An intact section of a historic urban railway was uncovered on Willamette Street between 19th Avenue and Grand View Drive during the City of Eugene’s repaving project in 2013. As the tracks are more than 75 years old, they are considered an archaeological resource protected under Oregon State law, and work was briefly delayed while a State of Oregon Archaeological Permit was obtained.
    [Show full text]