The MOS Silicon Gate Technology and the First Microprocessors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The MOS Silicon Gate Technology and the First Microprocessors The MOS Silicon Gate Technology and the First Microprocessors Federico Faggin This is a preprint of the article published in La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento, Società Italiana di Fisica, Vol. 38, No. 12, 2015 1. – Introduction There are a few key technological inventions in human history that have come to characterize an era. For example, the animal-pulled plow was the invention that enabled efficient agriculture, thus gradually ending nomadic culture and creating a new social order that in time produced another seminal invention. This was the steam engine which gave rise to the industrial revolution and created the environment out of which the electronic computer emerged – the third seminal invention that started the information revolution that is now defining our time. All such inventions have deep roots and a long evolution. Engines powered by water or wind were used for many centuries before being replaced by steam engines. Steam engines were then replaced by internal combustion engines, and finally electric motors became prevalent; each generation of engines being more powerful, more efficient, more versatile, and more convenient than the preceding one. Similarly, the origin of our present computers dates back to the abacus, a computational tool that was used for several millennia before being replaced by mechanical calculators in the 19th century, by electronic computers in the 1950’s, and by microchips toward the end of the 20th century. The invention of the electronic computer was originally motivated by the need for a much faster computational tool than was possible with electromechanical calculators operated by human beings. This improvement was accomplished not only by performing the four elementary operations considerably faster than previously possible with calculators, but even more importantly, by adding the ability to program a long sequence of arithmetic operations that could be executed automatically, without human intervention. The addition of programmability, proved to be an immensely fruitful and versatile capability, allowing computers to soon become universal symbol manipulators, with countless new applications, far exceeding what even programmable calculators were originally intended to do. Toward the end of the 20th century, the relentless progress in microelectronics combined with the digitization of all types of information, made computers so powerful, small, low-cost, and pervasive that many functions that previously required separate, single-function devices were subsumed by a single programmable mobile computer capable of handling the individual’s needs for communication, computation, control, and storage of all kinds of information, be it numbers, text, images, sound, or video. This paper will describe the history of two key inventions: the MOS silicon gate technology, and the microprocessor. These were the two developments that made it possible to replace huge and costly machines with pocket-size devices many thousands of times less expensive, and thousands of times more powerful than the early computers. This remarkable progress was due to the power and flexibility of microelectronics, the technology that provided the early transistors used in the second-generation computers. What’s remarkable is that while in the late 1950’s transistors were just one of the many key components necessary to build a computer, less than 20 years later an entire monolithic computer could be built in a single chip of silicon, in the same physical volume that previously housed a single transistor! This progress is unprecedented because in less than 30 years, a single chip weighting less than one gram, occupying a volume smaller than a cubic centimeter, dissipating less than one Watt, and selling for less than ten dollars could do more information processing than the UNIVAC I, the first commercial computer, which used 5200 vacuum tubes, dissipated 125 kW, weighted 13 metric tons, occupied more than 35 m2 of space, and sold for more than one million dollars per unit. Viewed from today’s perspective, the early giant computers of the 1950’s and ‘60’s provided precisely the architectural blueprints of the type of symbol manipulator that the world needed. The microelectronics industry then did the rest, bringing the cost, size, and energy requirement down to the point where a computer could fit inside an electric toothbrush, a hearing aid, or an inexpensive toy – applications that were not only unimaginable, but even incongruous when computers were room-sized and cost millions of dollars. After a brief history of microelectronics and computers, this paper will describe, from a first-person basis, the development of the silicon gate technology (SGT) at Fairchild Semiconductor, and the development of the early microprocessors (MP) at Intel, the two inventions that gave new life and impetus to the information revolution that began in the mid 1940’s with the development of the first mainframe electronic computers using vacuum tubes. 2. – A brief history of microelectronics Microelectronics officially started with the invention of the first transistor at Bell Laboratories in 1947 by John Bardeen, Walter Brattain and William Shockley, just one year after the first electronic computer, the ENIAC, was realized at the University of Pennsylvania. No one ever imagined at that time that these two inventions would merge, less than 30 years later, into a microchip, changing society in a fundamental way. By replacing the electro-mechanical relays used in previous generations of calculating machines with vacuum tubes, the operating speed of ENIAC was increased by more than a factor of 1,000. This increase in speed came at a cost — vacuum tubes were bulky, power-hungry, and most of all, unreliable. The short meantime between failures in a single vacuum tube was a crippling problem for a computer needing thousands of them. Considering the reliability issues that then plagued electronic equipment, vacuum tube computers were over 10 times more likely to malfunction when compared to the most complex electronic equipment of that time. The search for a viable vacuum tube replacement with a more reliable, smaller, power-efficient, and lower cost solid state device had been ongoing since the 1920’s. The first patent for a semiconductor “triode” was filed in 1925 by Julius Edgar Lilienfeld, and a more advanced device was patented by Oskar Heil in 1934. Both devices were field-effect devices, similar in principle to the current MOS transistors, but no commercial devices were ever produced. The first Bell Labs transistor was a point-contact device, commercialized in 1948 by Raytheon with model CK703. However, point-contact transistors were too difficult to build and too fragile to be useful, since even a modest mechanical shock could put an end to their operation. A new operating principle was needed. It was the breakthrough work of W. Shockley on diffusion transistors that introduced the new operating principles used in all modern bipolar transistors. This original work led to the first commercial alloy- junction transistors introduced by GE and RCA in 1951. From that point on, new applications for bipolar transistors started to grow rapidly – among them, the first hearing aids and portable radios – and in 1953, one million transistors were produced in the US alone. All early transistors used a tiny single-crystal of germanium as their starting semiconductor material, and were built one at a time, just like the vacuum tubes. It was soon realized, however, that a better semiconductor material was necessary, since the temperature effects on germanium transistors could cause a thermal runaway with the self-destruction of the transistor. This unwanted effect was due to the rather narrow bandgap (.66 eV at 300K) between the conduction band and the valence band of germanium crystals. Furthermore, the operating frequency of germanium transistors was rather limited. A better material, silicon, with a bandgap of 1.11 eV at 300K, was soon identified, and silicon junction transistors were introduced commercially for the first time by Texas Instruments (TI) in 1954. In 1957, a new company, Fairchild Semiconductor, was started in the San Francisco Bay Area by eight key engineers abruptly leaving Shockley Semiconductor. Among them were Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore, Jean Hoerni, and Jay Last. Fairchild’s mission was to develop advanced bipolar junction transistors made with silicon to serve the needs of the emergent aerospace industry. Just for size, in 1957 the total production of transistors in the US was 29 million units. Today, a single chip costing less than $1 may easily contain more than 30 million transistors, including all their interconnections. Before long, Fairchild Semiconductor became the leading company in the nascent microelectronics industry due to the seminal invention of the planar process by Jean Hoerni, a Swiss engineer. Up until that time, transistors had been fabricated one at a time. With the planar process, many transistors could be simultaneously fabricated, one next to the other, on the surface of a thin slice (called wafer) of a single-crystal silicon ingot. The planar process truly revolutionized the industry because it not only dramatically reduced the size and cost of transistors, but far more importantly, it made possible the monolithic integrated circuit (IC). Hoerni’s process consisted in fabricating an array of identical transistors on the surface of a silicon wafer with the diameter of less than one inch. This was done by recognizing that silicon dioxide could mask the diffusion of dopants in silicon. Therefore, the silicon doping necessary to create semiconductor junctions in specific places, could be achieved by first thermally growing a layer of silicon dioxide on the surface of a silicon wafer, and then opening windows in the oxide where the junctions were needed. The windows were defined by using photolithography followed by etching, a technique already in use to make printed circuit boards. After the removal of the oxide by chemical etching in the areas not protected by the developed photoresist, the junctions could then be created by thermal diffusion of the appropriate dopants into the silicon.
Recommended publications
  • When Is a Microprocessor Not a Microprocessor? the Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I
    Ross Bassett When is a Microprocessor not a Microprocessor? The Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I In the early 1990s an integrated circuit first made in 1969 and thus ante­ dating by two years the chip typically seen as the first microprocessor (Intel's 4004), became a microprocessor for the first time. The stimulus for this piece ofindustrial alchemy was a patent fight. A microprocessor patent had been issued to Texas Instruments, and companies faced with patent infringement lawsuits were looking for prior art with which to challenge it. 2 This old integrated circuit, but new microprocessor, was the ALl, designed by Lee Boysel and used in computers built by his start-up, Four-Phase Systems, established in 1968. In its 1990s reincarnation a demonstration system was built showing that the ALI could have oper­ ated according to the classic microprocessor model, with ROM (Read Only Memory), RAM (Random Access Memory), and I/O (Input/ Output) forming a basic computer. The operative words here are could have, for it was never used in that configuration during its normal life­ time. Instead it was used as one-third of a 24-bit CPU (Central Processing Unit) for a series ofcomputers built by Four-Phase.3 Examining the ALl through the lenses of the history of technology and business history puts Intel's microprocessor work into a different per­ spective. The differences between Four-Phase's and Intel's work were industrially constructed; they owed much to the different industries each saw itselfin.4 While putting a substantial part ofa central processing unit on a chip was not a discrete invention for Four-Phase or the computer industry, it was in the semiconductor industry.
    [Show full text]
  • "Bob" Schreiner
    Oral History of Robert “Bob” Schreiner Interviewed by: Stephen Diamond Recorded: June 10, 2013 Mountain View, California CHM Reference number: X6873.2014 © 2013 Computer History Museum Oral History of Robert “Bob” Schreiner Stephen Diamond: We're here at the Computer History Museum with Bob Schreiner. It's June 10th, 2013, and we're going to talk about the oral history of Synertek and the 6502. Welcome, Bob. Thanks for being here. Can you introduce yourself to us? Robert “Bob” Schreiner: Okay. My name is Bob Schreiner. I'm an ex-Fairchilder, one of the Fairchildren in the valley, and then involved in running a couple of other small semiconductor companies, and I started a semiconductor company. Diamond: So that would be Synertek. Schreiner: Synertek. Diamond: Tell us about that. Schreiner: Okay. As you know from an earlier session I left Fairchild Semiconductor around 1971. And at the time I left I was running the LSI program at Fairchild, and I was a big believer that the future marketplace for MOS technology would be in the custom area. And since Fairchild let that whole thing fall apart, I decided there's got to be room for a company to start up to do that very thing, work with big producers of hardware and develop custom chips for them so they would have a propriety product that would be difficult to copy. So I wrote a business plan, and I went around to a number of manufacturers. I had a computer guy [General Automation], and I had Bulova Watch Company, and I had a company that made electronic telephones [American Telephones], and who was the fourth guy? Escapes my memory right now, but the pitch basically was, "Your business, which now you manufacture things with discrete components, it's going to change.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the Intel® LXT973 Ethernet Transceiver Application Note
    Intel® IXP42X Product Line and IXC1100 Control Plane Processor: Using the Intel® LXT973 Ethernet Transceiver Application Note July 2004 Document Number: 253429-002 Intel® IXP42X Product Line and IXC1100 Control Plane Processor: Using the Intel® LXT973 Ethernet Transceiver INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH INTEL® PRODUCTS. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN INTEL'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SUCH PRODUCTS, INTEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER, AND INTEL DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY RELATING TO SALE AND/OR USE OF INTEL PRODUCTS, INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT, OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. Intel Corporation may have patents or pending patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights that relate to the presented subject matter. The furnishing of documents and other materials and information does not provide any license, express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, to any such patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights. Intel products are not intended for use in medical, life saving, life sustaining, critical control or safety systems, or in nuclear facility applications. Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. Designers must not rely on the absence or characteristics of any features or instructions marked "reserved" or "undefined." Intel reserves these for future definition and shall have no responsibility whatsoever for conflicts or incompatibilities arising from future changes to them. Contact your local Intel sales office or your distributor to obtain the latest specifications and before placing your product order.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Note 1
    EE586 VLSI Design Partha Pande School of EECS Washington State University [email protected] Lecture 1 (Introduction) Why is designing digital ICs different today than it was before? Will it change in future? The First Computer The Babbage Difference Engine (1832) 25,000 parts cost: £17,470 ENIAC - The first electronic computer (1946) The Transistor Revolution First transistor Bell Labs, 1948 The First Integrated Circuits Bipolar logic 1960’s ECL 3-input Gate Motorola 1966 Intel 4004 Micro-Processor 1971 1000 transistors 1 MHz operation Intel Pentium (IV) microprocessor Moore’s Law In 1965, Gordon Moore noted that the number of transistors on a chip doubled every 18 to 24 months. He made a prediction that semiconductor technology will double its effectiveness every 18 months Moore’s Law 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 OF THE NUMBER OF 2 5 4 LOG 3 2 1 COMPONENTS PER INTEGRATED FUNCTION 0 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 Electronics, April 19, 1965. Evolution in Complexity Transistor Counts 1 Billion K Transistors 1,000,000 100,000 Pentium® III 10,000 Pentium® II Pentium® Pro 1,000 Pentium® i486 100 i386 80286 10 8086 Source: Intel 1 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Projected Courtesy, Intel Moore’s law in Microprocessors 1000 2X growth in 1.96 years! 100 10 P6 Pentium® proc 1 486 386 0.1 286 Transistors (MT) Transistors 8086 Transistors8085 on Lead Microprocessors double every 2 years 0.01 8080 8008 4004 0.001 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year Courtesy, Intel Die Size Growth 100 P6
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Face- Modules/Documents/Face-Modules-Hw-Specifications.Pdf
    I PC H “ CompuLab Ltd. Revision 1.2 December 2013 Legal Notice © 2013 CompuLab Ltd. All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be photocopied, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means whether, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise without the prior written permission of CompuLab Ltd. No warranty of accuracy is given concerning the contents of the information contained in this publication. To the extent permitted by law no liability (including liability to any person by reason of negligence) will be accepted by CompuLab Ltd., its subsidiaries or employees for any direct or indirect loss or damage caused by omissions from or inaccuracies in this document. CompuLab Ltd. reserves the right to change details in this publication without notice. Product and company names herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners. CompuLab Ltd. 17 HaYetsira St., Yokneam Elite 20692, P.O.B 687 ISRAEL Tel: +972-4-8290100 http://www.compulab.co.il http://fit-pc.com/web/ Fax: +972-4-8325251 CompuLab Ltd. Intense PC Hardware Specification Page 2 of 74 Revision History Revision Engineer Revision Changes 1.0 Maxim Birger Initial public release 1.1 Maxim Birger Memory Interface updated Super-IO Controller peripheral section added RS232 serial com port info added 1.2 Maxim Birger HDMI Block Diagram updated DP Block Diagram updated CompuLab Ltd. Intense PC Hardware Specification Page 3 of 74 Table of Contents Legal Notice ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HP RP5810 Retail System, Model 5810
    QuickSpecs HP RP5 Retail System, Model 5810 Overview HP RP5 Retail System, Model 5810 Front View 1. 5.25” external optical drive 5. NIC link indicator LED 2. Power/ Diagnostic LED 6. Hard Drive LED 3. NIC link indicator LED 7. Power button 4. 2 USB 2.0 ports with sliding door c04304464 — DA - 14956 Worldwide — Version 8 — December 8, 2014 Page 1 QuickSpecs HP RP5 Retail System, Model 5810 Overview Rear View 1. 24 Volt USB + PWR port 10. PS/2 keyboard port 2. Two (2) Full-Height Slots* 11. VGA port 3. RS232 serial COM3 12. 3 USB 2.0 ports 4. RJ-45 LAN jack 13. 2 USB 3.0 ports 5. RS232 serial (power configurable) COM1 port 14. RS232 serial (power configurable) COM2 port 6. PS/2 mouse port 15. DisplayPort 7. 240W EPA – Active PFC power supply (no line 16. RJ12 cash drawer port switching required) 8. Line in audio jack 17. One (1) PCIe x16 Slot (wired as x16)** – shown is optional three (3) port 12 Volt USB +Power Card 9. Line out audio jack 18. One (1) PCIe x16 Slot (wired as x4)** – shown is optional three (3) port 12 Volt USB + Power Card * Can be configured either as two (2) PCI x1 or two (2) PCIe x1 Full-Height slots. Shown is optional 2 Port RS232 serial (power configurable) Card, COM4 port (left) and COM3 port (right port). **A variety of cards are available to populate slots, dependant on riser choice and connectors utilized. For full details, please contact your HP sales representative for configuration choices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth, Evolution and Future of Microprocessor
    The Birth, Evolution and Future of Microprocessor Swetha Kogatam Computer Science Department San Jose State University San Jose, CA 95192 408-924-1000 [email protected] ABSTRACT timed sequence through the bus system to output devices such as The world's first microprocessor, the 4004, was co-developed by CRT Screens, networks, or printers. In some cases, the terms Busicom, a Japanese manufacturer of calculators, and Intel, a U.S. 'CPU' and 'microprocessor' are used interchangeably to denote the manufacturer of semiconductors. The basic architecture of 4004 same device. was developed in August 1969; a concrete plan for the 4004 The different ways in which microprocessors are categorized are: system was finalized in December 1969; and the first microprocessor was successfully developed in March 1971. a) CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computers) Microprocessors, which became the "technology to open up a new b) RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computers) era," brought two outstanding impacts, "power of intelligence" and "power of computing". First, microprocessors opened up a new a) VLIW(Very Long Instruction Word Computers) "era of programming" through replacing with software, the b) Super scalar processors hardwired logic based on IC's of the former "era of logic". At the same time, microprocessors allowed young engineers access to "power of computing" for the creative development of personal 2. BIRTH OF THE MICROPROCESSOR computers and computer games, which in turn led to growth in the In 1970, Intel introduced the first dynamic RAM, which increased software industry, and paved the way to the development of high- IC memory by a factor of four.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Configuration Manager API for Windows Library Reference
    Native Configuration Manager API for Windows Operating Systems Library Reference December 2003 05-1903-002 INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH INTEL® PRODUCTS. NO LICENSE, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, BY ESTOPPEL OR OTHERWISE, TO ANY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IS GRANTED BY THIS DOCUMENT. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN INTEL'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR SUCH PRODUCTS, INTEL ASSUMES NO LIABILITY WHATSOEVER, AND INTEL DISCLAIMS ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY, RELATING TO SALE AND/OR USE OF INTEL PRODUCTS INCLUDING LIABILITY OR WARRANTIES RELATING TO FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY, OR INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, COPYRIGHT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT. Intel products are not intended for use in medical, life saving, or life sustaining applications. Intel may make changes to specifications and product descriptions at any time, without notice. This Native Configuration Manager API for Windows Operating Systems Library Reference as well as the software described in it is furnished under license and may only be used or copied in accordance with the terms of the license. The information in this manual is furnished for informational use only, is subject to change without notice, and should not be construed as a commitment by Intel Corporation. Intel Corporation assumes no responsibility or liability for any errors or inaccuracies that may appear in this document or any software that may be provided in association with this document. Except as permitted by such license, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without express written consent of Intel Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MICROPROCESSOR Z Z the BEGINNING
    z THE MICROPROCESSOR z z THE BEGINNING The construction of microprocessors was made possible thanks to LSI (Silicon Gate Technology) developed by the Italian Federico Faggin at Fairchild in 1968. From the 1980s onwards microprocessors are practically the only CPU implementation. z HOW DO MICROPROCESSOR WORK? Most microprocessor work digitally, transforming all the input information into a code of binary number (1 or 0 is called a bit, 8 bit is called byte) z THE FIRST MICROPROCESSOR Intel's first microprocessor, the 4004, was conceived by Ted Hoff and Stanley Mazor. Assisted by Masatoshi Shima, Federico Faggin used his experience in silicon- gate MOS technology (1968 Milestone) to squeeze the 2300 transistors of the 4-bit MPU into a 16-pin package in 1971. z WHAT WAS INTEL 4004 USED FOR? The Intel 4004 was the world's first microprocessor—a complete general-purpose CPU on a single chip. Released in March 1971, and using cutting-edge silicon- gate technology, the 4004 marked the beginning of Intel's rise to global dominance in the processor industry. z THE FIRST PERSONAL COMPUTER WITH MICROPROCESSOR MS-DOSIBM introduces its Personal Computer (PC)The first IBM PC, formally known as the IBM Model 5150, was based on a 4.77 MHz Intel 8088 microprocessor and used Microsoft´s MS-DOS operating system. The IBM PC revolutionized business computing by becoming the first PC to gain widespread adoption by industry. z BIOHACKER z WHO ARE BIOHACKER? Biohackers, also called hackers of life, are people and communities that do biological research in the hacker style: outside the institutions, in an open form, sharing information.
    [Show full text]
  • Delft University of Technology on Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D
    Delft University of Technology On Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D Memory Hierarchies Lefter, Mihai DOI 10.4233/uuid:f744c1af-505e-440c-bc49-2a1d95d0591d Publication date 2018 Document Version Final published version Citation (APA) Lefter, M. (2018). On Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D Memory Hierarchies. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:f744c1af-505e-440c-bc49-2a1d95d0591d Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. On Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D Memory Hierarchies Cover inspired by the works of Dirk Huizer and Anatoly Konenko. On Leveraging Vertical Proximity in 3D Memory Hierarchies Dissertation for the purpose of obtaining the degree of doctor at Delft University of Technology by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. dr. ir. T.H.J.J. van der Hagen chair of the Board for Doctorates to be defended publicly on Wednesday 14 November 2018 at 10:00 o’clock by Mihai LEFTER Master of Science in Computer Engineering Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands born in Bras, ov, Romania This dissertation has been approved by the promotors.
    [Show full text]
  • Intel® Technology Journal
    9/4/09 8:28:45 AM Intel® Technology Journal Technology Intel® SEPTEMBER 2009 in the Home Enabling Healthcare INTEL® TECHNOLOGY JOURNAL | ENABLING HEALTHCARE IN THE HOME VOL 13 | ISSUE 03 | SEPTEMBER 2009 35858 21143 77 ISBN 978-1-934053-23-2 9 781934 053232 $49.95 US Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, and the Intel logo, are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other countries. Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. More information, including current and past issues of Intel Technology Journal, can be found at: at: Journal, can be found Technology Intel issues of and past including current information, More http://developer.intel.com/technology/itj/index.htm ITJ9-3_Cover_BFC_39spn_090409.indd 1 About the Cover Enabling Healthcare in the Home is the theme of the Intel Technology Journal, Volume 13, Issue 3. The physician in the foreground (1) is remotely performing a house call. The doctor is able to see the patient (2) and to obtain diagnostic information, such as blood pressure and pulse vitals. The patient is able to remain at home, which is helpful and efficient for those with ambulatory or transportation issues. Next door (3) is an elderly person who can safely live independently because the home is out- fitted with sensors (the yellow spots) that monitor motion. Family caregivers located elsewhere can be aware that this individual is performing routine tasks. Upstairs is (4) someone sleeping. Sensors measure nighttime activity, which can be an indicator of health risk. Also upstairs (5) is a child or an elderly person for whom reading is difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVICE and CIRCUIT DESIGN for VLSI by Amr Mohsen
    31 DEVICE AND CIRCUIT DESIGN FOR VLSI by Amr Mohsen* Intel Corporation 3065 Bowers Avenue Santa Clara, California 95051 ABSTRACT A review of the device and circuit design complexity and limitations for VLSI is presented. VLSI device performance will be limited by second order device effects, interconnection line de lay and current density and chip power dissipation. The complexity of VLSI circuit design will require hierarchial structured design methodology with special consideration of testability dnd more emphasis on redundancy. New organizations of logic function architectures and smart memories will evolve to take advantage of the topological properties of the VLSI silicon technology. * The author is also on the faculty of California Institute of Technology CALTECH CONFERENCE ON VLSI, January 1979 32 Amr Mohsen I. INTRODUCTION: As semiconductor technology has evolved from discrete to small-scale to medium-scale and through large-scale integration levels a rapid decrease in the cost per function provided by the technology have opened up new applications and industries. Today there is a large interest in the next phase of integration: very large scale integration (VLSI). The semi­ conductor technology will be able to fabricate chips with more than lOOK devices (l) in the 1980's. The continuous scaling of the semi- conductor devices and increase in components counts on a single chip is resulting in more complex technology developments, device and circuit designs and product definition. In this review paper, projections of how device technology will evolve in the future and the problems and limitations of device and circuit design for VLSI are presented. VLSI TECHNOLOGIES: In Fig.
    [Show full text]