DOCSLIB.ORG

Courtney D. Lakevold

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Space and Social Structure in the A.D. 13th Century Occupation of Promontory Cave 1, Utah by Courtney D. Lakevold A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology University of Alberta © Courtney D. Lakevold, 2017 ABSTRACT Promontory Cave 1, located on the north shore of Great Salt Lake in northern Utah, has yielded many extraordinary archaeological artifacts that are amazingly well-preserved. Promontory phase deposits in Cave 1 are extremely thick, and rich with perishables and other material culture. Bison bones, fur, leather and hide processing artifacts have been recovered at the site, in addition to gaming pieces, basketry, pottery, juniper bark for bedding, knife handles, ceramics and moccasins. A large central hearth area, pictograph panels, pathways and entrance and exit routes have also been identified. Bayesian modeling from AMS dates indicates a high probability that the cave was occupied for one or two human generations over a 20-50 year interval (A.D. 1240-1290). Excavations have taken place at the cave from 2011-2014 by an interdisciplinary research team with members from the University of Alberta (Institute of Prairie Archaeology), the Natural History Museum of Utah (NHMU), Oxford, the Desert Research Institute and Brigham Young University. The extraordinary preservation and narrow time frame (A.D. 1240-1290) for the occupation of Promontory Cave 1 on Great Salt Lake allow for unusual insights into the demography of its Promontory Culture inhabitants. This thesis looks at the cave as a humanly inhabited space and examines what the Promontory Culture group may have looked like in terms of population size and group composition, and how they used or organized space in the cave. This is accomplished by combining accurate data on the livable space in Cave 1 with calculated space needs per person from ethnographic accounts of Western North American hunter-gatherer groups in order to estimate likely group size. These data, combined with work done with by Billinger and Ives (2015) on moccasin data from the cave (indicating age and stature of the inhabitants), allow insights into group composition. ii Space in the cave is analyzed using space syntax analysis and soundscapes, and common patterns of spatial organization of built dwellings of Western North American hunter-gatherer groups are compared to areas of cultural deposition and excavation data from the cave. Models of how the space may have been used are presented. In addition, defensibility of several sites located on Promontory Point are calculated and compared to defensible sites on the Northwest Coast and in the Fraser Canyon area of British Columbia. I argue that the three Promontory Culture sites located on Promontory Point are highly defensible. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To my family – thank you for your unconditional love and support. I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. John (Jack) Ives, for taking me on as a graduate student and giving me the opportunity to work on the Promontory project. It has been an invaluable and amazing experience that I will carry with me for the rest of my life and career. Thank you for your support and guidance throughout this process and for your patience as I juggled a full time job, life, and thesis writing. To my IPA cohort – thank you for being there to listen and to run ideas by, for providing support and guidance when needed, for your comic relief and visits to the pub. Having the support and understanding of good friends has made all the difference. And, thanks to Todd for including me in your NWT adventures! Thank you to George and Kumeroa Chournos for your kindness, generosity, warmth, and for your willingness to share such a special place with us. Thank you also to the Brigham Young University crew of Dr. Joel Janetski, Lindsay Johannson and Katie Richards for a great field season and for showing us Canadians the ropes down in Utah. Thanks also to Scott Ure for assistance with the 3D point cloud data. I must also thank Dr. Sally Rice and Conor Snoek for their help with the acoustic testing in Cave 1. Many thanks to my thesis committee: Dr. Kisha Supernant, Dr. Robert Losey, and Dr. Ruth Gruhn, for your comments, feedback and support. Kisha has also provided mentorship, guidance, and TA opportunities throughout this process and for that I am grateful. In addition to all of that, she is also a wonderful role model! I am grateful to John Kristensen who provided valuable feedback on earlier drafts of this thesis. Others that kindly provided assistance throughout this process include Pierre Boulanger (University of Alberta), Dr. David McGee (M.I.T.) and R. Kyle Bocinsky (Washington State University). Thank you to the Baikal–Hokkaido Archaeology Project for use of their 3D modeling software and for the opportunity to attend the Leica 3D scanner workshop. Special thanks to Erin Jessup for accommodating me. Funding for this research was provided in part by the Department of Anthropology, University of Alberta, the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research (QEII Scholarship) and Dr. John Ives’ SSHRC Insight Grant 435-2012-0140 (Apachean Origins: New Explorations of the Canadian Heritage of A. D. 13th Century Dene at Promontory Point, Utah) and Landrex Distinguished Professorship. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..........................................................................................................................................iv TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................. v LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................................................... vii LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF PLATES ......................................................................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Region...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Environmental History............................................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 Regional Culture History ....................................................................................................................................... 21 2.4 Promontory Cave 1 ................................................................................................................................................ 30 2.5 Other Promontory Culture Research ...................................................................................................................... 40 2.6 Chapter Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 43 CHAPTER 3THEORETICAL APPROACH .............................................................................................................. 44 3.1 Theories of Space and Place .................................................................................................................................. 44 3.2 Space Syntax Theory ............................................................................................................................................. 46 3.3 Anthropological Theory......................................................................................................................................... 52 3.4 Ethnographic Analogy in Archaeological Research .............................................................................................. 56 3.5 3D Modeling and Its Uses in Archaeology ............................................................................................................ 58 3.6 Archaeoacoustics ................................................................................................................................................... 60 3.7 Chapter Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 62 CHAPTER 4 USE OF SPACE AND SOCIAL STRUCTURE: ...................................................................................... WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN HUNTER-GATHERER GROUPS ..................................................................... 63 4.1 Group Hierarchies .................................................................................................................................................. 64 4.2 Group Sizes ..........................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Archaeoacoustics: a Key Role of Echoes at Utah Rock Art Sites

    Archaeoacoustics: a Key Role of Echoes at Utah Rock Art Sites

    Steven J. Waller ARCHAEOACOUSTICS: A KEY ROLE OF ECHOES AT UTAH ROCK ART SITES Archaeoacoustics is an emerging field of study emanate from rock surfaces where beings are investigating sound in relation to the past. The depicted, as if the images are speaking. Myths intent of this paper is to convey appreciation for attribute echoes to sheep, humans, lizards, the echoes at Utah rock art sites, by recognizing snakes and other figures that are major rock art the importance of their influence both on the themes. Echo-rich Fremont Indian State Park ancient artists, and on modern scientific studies. even has a panel that has been interpreted as The title of this paper is thus intentionally showing the mythological Echo Twin. The worded such that it could be understood in two study, appreciation, and preservation of rock art different but interrelated ways. One, the study acoustics in Utah are encouraged. of sound indicates that echoes were an im- portant factor relative to rock art in Utah. Two, INITIAL STUDIES OUTSIDE UTAH the echoes found to be associated with Utah rock art sites have been particularly helpful in A conceptual connection between sound and developing theories relating sound to past cul- rock art originally occurred to me when visiting tural activities and ideologies. This paper de- European Palaeolithic caves in 1987. A fortui- scribes in a roughly chronological order the tous shout at the mouth of a cave resulted in a events and studies that have led to Utah featur- startling echo. I immediately remembered the ing prominently in the development of archaeo- Greek myth in which echoes were attributed to acoustics.
  • New Mexico New Mexico

    New Mexico New Mexico

    NEW MEXICO NEWand MEXICO the PIMERIA ALTA THE COLONIAL PERIOD IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEst edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves NEW MEXICO AND THE PIMERÍA ALTA NEWand MEXICO thePI MERÍA ALTA THE COLONIAL PERIOD IN THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEst edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves UNIVERSITY PRESS OF COLORADO Boulder © 2017 by University Press of Colorado Published by University Press of Colorado 5589 Arapahoe Avenue, Suite 206C Boulder, Colorado 80303 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America The University Press of Colorado is a proud member of Association of American University Presses. The University Press of Colorado is a cooperative publishing enterprise supported, in part, by Adams State University, Colorado State University, Fort Lewis College, Metropolitan State University of Denver, Regis University, University of Colorado, University of Northern Colorado, Utah State University, and Western State Colorado University. ∞ This paper meets the requirements of the ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). ISBN: 978-1-60732-573-4 (cloth) ISBN: 978-1-60732-574-1 (ebook) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Douglass, John G., 1968– editor. | Graves, William M., editor. Title: New Mexico and the Pimería Alta : the colonial period in the American Southwest / edited by John G. Douglass and William M. Graves. Description: Boulder : University Press of Colorado, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016044391| ISBN 9781607325734 (cloth) | ISBN 9781607325741 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Spaniards—Pimería Alta (Mexico and Ariz.)—History. | Spaniards—Southwest, New—History. | Indians of North America—First contact with Europeans—Pimería Alta (Mexico and Ariz.)—History.
  • The Case of the Beaulieu Abbey

    The Case of the Beaulieu Abbey

    acoustics Article An Archaeoacoustics Analysis of Cistercian Architecture: The Case of the Beaulieu Abbey Sebastian Duran *, Martyn Chambers * and Ioannis Kanellopoulos * School of Media Arts and Technology, Solent University (Southampton), East Park Terrace, Southampton SO14 0YN, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (S.D.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (I.K.) Abstract: The Cistercian order is of acoustic interest because previous research has hypothesized that Cistercian architectural structures were designed for longer reverberation times in order to reinforce Gregorian chants. The presented study focused on an archaeoacacoustics analysis of the Cistercian Beaulieu Abbey (Hampshire, England, UK), using Geometrical Acoustics (GA) to recreate and investigate the acoustical properties of the original structure. To construct an acoustic model of the Abbey, the building’s dimensions and layout were retrieved from published archaeology research and comparison with equivalent structures. Absorption and scattering coefficients were assigned to emulate the original room surface materials’ acoustics properties. CATT-Acoustics was then used to perform the acoustics analysis of the simplified building structure. Shorter reverbera- tion time (RTs) was generally observed at higher frequencies for all the simulated scenarios. Low speech intelligibility index (STI) and speech clarity (C50) values were observed across Abbey’s nave section. Despite limitations given by the impossibility to calibrate the model according to in situ measurements conducted in the original structure, the simulated acoustics performance suggested Citation: Duran, S.; Chambers, M.; how the Abbey could have been designed to promote sacral music and chants, rather than preserve Kanellopoulos, I. An Archaeoacoustics high speech intelligibility. Analysis of Cistercian Architecture: The Case of the Beaulieu Abbey.
  • Internationale Bibliographie Für Speläologie Jahr 1953 1-80 Wissenschaftliche Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift „Die Höhle44 Nr

    Internationale Bibliographie Für Speläologie Jahr 1953 1-80 Wissenschaftliche Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift „Die Höhle44 Nr

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Die Höhle - Wissenschaftliche Beihefte zur Zeitschrift Jahr/Year: 1958 Band/Volume: 5_1958 Autor(en)/Author(s): Trimmel Hubert Artikel/Article: Internationale Bibliographie für Speläologie Jahr 1953 1-80 Wissenschaftliche Beihefte zur Zeitschrift „Die Höhle44 Nr. 5 INTERNATIONALE BIBLIOGRAPHIE FÜR SPELÄOLOGIE (KARST- U.' HÖHLENKUNDE) JAHR 1953 VQN HUBERT TRIMMEL Unter teilweiser Mitarbeit zahlreicher Fachleute Wien 1958 Herausgegeben vom Landesverein für Höhlenkunde in Wien und Niederösterreich ■ ■ . ' 1 . Wissenschaftliche Beihefte zur Zeitschrift „Die Höhle44 Nr. 5 INTERNATIONALE BIBLIOGRAPHIE FÜR SPELÄOLOGIE (KARST- U. HÖHLENKUNDE) JAHR 1953 VON HUBERT TRIMMEL Unter teilweiser Mitarbeit zahlreicher Fachleute Wien 1958 Herausgegeben vom Landesverein für Höhlenkunde in Wien und Niederösterreich Gedruckt mit Unterstützung des Notringes der wissenschaftlichen Ve rbände Öste rrei chs Eigentümer, Herausgeber und Verleger: Landesverein für Höhlen­ kunde in Wien und Niederösterreich, Wien II., Obere Donaustr. 99 Vari-typer-Satz: Notring der wissenschaftlichen Verbände Österreichs Wien I., Judenplatz 11 Photomech.Repr.u.Druck: Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen (Landesaufnahme) in Wien - 3 - VORWORT Das Amt für Kultur und Volksbildung der Stadt Wien und der Notring der wissenschaftlichen Verbände haben durch ihre wertvolle Unterstützung auch das Erscheinen dieses vierten Heftes mit bibliographischen
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
  • Antiquity (August 2007)

    Antiquity (August 2007)

    Set the wild echoes flying By Jerry D. Moore Department of Anthropology, California State University Dominguez Hills, 1000 K Victoria Street, Carson, CA 90747, USA (Email: [email protected]) BARRY BLESSER & LINDA-RUTH SALTER. Spaces speak, The two volumes under review are you listening? Experiencing aural architecture. form a complementary pair of xiv+438 pages, 21 illustrations. 2007. Cambridge texts, although not a perfect (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 978-0- fit. Barry Blesser and Linda- 262-02605-5 hardback £25.95. CHRIS SCARRE & Ruth Salter's book, Spaces GRAEME LAWSON (ed.). Archaeoacoustics. x+126 Speak, Are You Listening?, is a pages, 68 illustrations, 5 tables. 2006. Cambridge: broad overview, an often en- McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 1- gaging introduction to aural 902937-35-X hardback £25. architecture and spatial Second only to scent as the most evanescent of acoustics. Archaeoacoustics, sensations, sound would seem particularly elusive of edited by Chris Scarre and archaeological inquiry. And yet — and obviously — Graeme Lawson, is a human life is inherently aural, and ancient sound is collection of conference papers intertwined in our species' evolution and social that present specific case existence. Throughout prehistory humans have studies about the creation extended the ambit of sound with instruments, of auditory spaces and, to a specially created spaces, and composed tonalities. lesser extent, the development of culturally For such reasons, at some level archaeology must formalised
  • Research Designs for Hawaiian Archaeology

    Research Designs for Hawaiian Archaeology

    Research Designs for Hawaiian Archaeology Research Designs for Hawaiian Archaeology Agriculture, Architecture, Methodology Thomas S. Dye, editor Special Publication 3 Society for Hawaiian Archaeology All rights reserved. Copyright © 2010 by Society for Hawaiian Archaeology. Published in 2010 in the United States of America by Society for Hawaiian Archaeology, P.O. Box 23292, Honolulu, HI 96823. Contents List of Figures vii List of Tables ix 1 Watershed: Testing the Limited Land Hypothesis Robert J. Hommon 1 2 Traditional Hawaiian Surface Architecture: Absolute and Rel- ative Dating Thomas S. Dye 93 3 Lady Mondegreen’s Hopes and Dreams: Three Brief Essays on Inference in Hawaiian Archaeology Dave Tuggle 157 Index 185 v List of Figures 2.1 Map of the Hawaiian Islands . 96 2.2 Oblique schematic of Kaneaki Heiau . 98 2.3 Plan of site 50–10–04–22268 ................... 104 2.4 Interior of the U-shape enclosure at site 50–10–04–22268 . 105 2.5 Panoramic view of site 50–10–04–22268 ............ 106 2.6 Hypothetical stratigraphic section . 110 2.7 Bayesian calibration yields interpretable results . 113 2.8 Deduction and induction . 115 2.9 Plan of site 50–10–04–22119 .................... 121 2.10 Dated enclosure at site 50–10–04–22119 ............ 122 2.11 Plan of site 50–10–04–22201 ................... 124 2.12 Plan of site 50–10–04–22248 ................... 125 2.13 Plan of site 50–50–17–1089 .................... 127 2.14 Plan of site 50–50–17–1088 .................... 128 2.15 Estimated ages of construction events . 132 2.16 Plan of H¯apaiali‘i Heiau .
  • Songs of the Caves: Sound and Prehistoric Art in Caves

    Songs of the Caves: Sound and Prehistoric Art in Caves

    Songs of the Caves: Sound and Prehistoric Art in Caves Initial report on a study in the Cave of Tito Bustillo, Asturias, Spain Dr. Rupert Till, Dr Simon Wyatt, Dr. Bruno Fazenda, Dr. Jon Sheaffer, Prof. Chris Scarre. Project Team: Dr Rupert Till, University of Huddersfield (UK); Prof. Chris Scarre, Durham University (UK); Dr Bruno Fazenda, University of Salford (UK); Dr Simon Wyatt, Durham University (UK); Dr Jon Sheaffer, University of Salford (UK); Dr Aaron Watson, www.Monumental.uk.com / University of Huddersfield (UK); Prof. Roberto Ontañón Peredo, University of Cantabria; Prof. Manuel Rojo Guerra, University of Valladolid; Prof. Pablo Arias Cabal (University of Cantabria), Raquel Pasolodas Jiménez, University of Valladolid; Cristina Tejedor, University of Valladolid; Carlos Benito Garcia, University of Zaragoza; Prof. Jian Kang, University of Sheffield (UK); Prof. Paul Pettitt. University of Durham (UK). Introduction The visual primacy of rock-art imagery can sometimes blind researchers to equally important but less obvious, non-visual aspects of rock art. Recent work from southern Africa indicates that certain San rock engravings were hammered, rubbed, cut and flaked in order to produce sound; to touch certain numinous images and rocks; and to possess pieces of potent places. Ouzman 2001: 237. A significant amount of evidence exists for the significance of organised sound in prehistory (Seewald 1934; Megaw 1968; Wyatt 2009). Research in this area has progressed for over 30 years, for example within the International Council for Traditional Music (ICTM) International Study Group for Music Archaeology (ISGMA). This includes the discovery of fragmentary sound making devices dated to 40,000 BP (Conard et al 2009).
  • Using Scale Modelling to Assess the Prehistoric Acoustics of Stonehenge Cox, TJ, Fazenda, BM and Greaney, SE

    Using Scale Modelling to Assess the Prehistoric Acoustics of Stonehenge Cox, TJ, Fazenda, BM and Greaney, SE

    Using scale modelling to assess the prehistoric acoustics of stonehenge Cox, TJ, Fazenda, BM and Greaney, SE http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2020.105218 Title Using scale modelling to assess the prehistoric acoustics of stonehenge Authors Cox, TJ, Fazenda, BM and Greaney, SE Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/58059/ Published Date 2020 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Journal of Archaeological Science 122 (2020) 105218 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Using scale modelling to assess the prehistoric acoustics of stonehenge Trevor J. Cox a,*, Bruno M. Fazenda a, Susan E. Greaney b a Acoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, UK b English Heritage, 29 Queen Square, Bristol, BS1 4ND, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: With social rituals usually involving sound, an archaeological understanding of a site requires the acoustics to be Acoustics assessed. This paper demonstrates how this can be done with acoustic scale models. Scale modelling is an Stonehenge established method in architectural acoustics, but it has not previously been applied to prehistoric monuments. Prehistoric The Stonehenge model described here allows the acoustics in the Late Neolithic and early Bronze Age to be Scale modelling quantified and the effects on musical sounds and speech to be inferred.
  • A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: an Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-Life, and Accumulation

    A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: an Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-Life, and Accumulation

    A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: An Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-life, and Accumulation by Jennifer Hallson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology University of Alberta © Jennifer Hallson, 2017 Abstract Promontory Cave 1 on Great Salt Lake, Utah exhibits an incredible level of preservation rarely seen at archaeological sites. The high proportion of perishable materials provides a unique opportunity to study cultural remains that are usually lost to taphonomic processes. Extensive radiocarbon dating has defined a narrow occupation period of ca. 1250-1290 CE (Ives et al. 2014) and the bounded space of the cave allows for confident estimations of the total number of artifacts present. I have completed quantitative analyses that use several methods to study Cave 1 and its inhabitants, including: artifact density, three-dimensional modeling, proportional calculations, accumulation equations, and statistical equations. Archaeologists know surprisingly little about the rates at which artifacts enter the archaeological record and my analyses examine this factor along with related variables such as use-life and accumulation with the above methods. The above methods also allow for inferences to be made on population size, population composition, and occupation span and frequency. Quantitative analyses of the Promontory Cave 1 assemblage can be linked directly to the exploration of Dene migration southward from Canada, as artifacts found in the cave point towards an identity of Apachean ancestors during their migration south. This research also has the potential for much broader application in archaeological investigations by increasing our awareness of what is usually missing; organic artifacts by far dominated past life but are often forgotten during site analysis.
  • IDAHO ARCHAEOLOGIST Editor MARK G

    IDAHO ARCHAEOLOGIST Editor MARK G

    ISSN 0893-2271 1 Volume 43, Number 1 S IDAHO A ARCHAEOLOGIST I Journal of the Idaho Archaeological Society……. 2 THE IDAHO ARCHAEOLOGIST Editor MARK G. PLEW, Department of Anthropology, 1910 University Drive, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-1950; email: [email protected] Editorial Advisory Board KIRK HALFORD, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709; email: [email protected] BONNIE PITBLADO, Department of Anthropology, Dale Hall Tower 521A, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019; email: [email protected] ROBERT SAPPINGTON, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, P.O. Box 441110, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-441110; email [email protected] MARK WARNER, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, P.O. Box 441110, University of Idaho, Moscow,ID 83844-441110; email [email protected] PEI-LIN YU, Department of Anthropology,1910 University Drive, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-1950; email: [email protected] CHARLES SPEER, Department of Anthropology/Idaho Museum of Natural History, 921 S 8th Ave, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209-8005; email: [email protected] Scope The Idaho Archaeologist publishes peer reviewed articles, reports, and book reviews. Though the journal’s primary focus is the archeology of Idaho, technical and more theoretical papers having relevance to issues in Idaho and surrounding areas will be considered. The Idaho Archaeologist is published semi-annually in cooperation with the College of Arts and Sciences, Boise State University as the journal of the Idaho Archaeological Society. Submissions Articles should be submitted online to the Editor at [email protected]. Upon re- view and acceptance authors are required to electronically submit their manuscripts in Microsoft Word.
  • The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and How We M

    The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and How We M

    PALEOAMERICA, 2017 Center for the Study of the First Americans http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2016.1272395 Texas A&M University REVIEW ARTICLE The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and How We May Be Wrong Geoffrey M. Smitha and Pat Barkerb aGreat Basin Paleoindian Research Unit, Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA; bNevada State Museum, Carson City, NV, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The Great Basin has traditionally not featured prominently in discussions of how and when the New Great Basin; Paleoindian World was colonized; however, in recent years work at Oregon’s Paisley Five Mile Point Caves and archaeology; peopling of the other sites has highlighted the region’s importance to ongoing debates about the peopling of the Americas Americas. In this paper, we outline our current understanding of Paleoindian lifeways in the northwestern Great Basin, focusing primarily on developments in the past 20 years. We highlight several potential biases that have shaped traditional interpretations of Paleoindian lifeways and suggest that the foundations of ethnographically-documented behavior were present in the earliest period of human history in the region. 1. Introduction comprehensive review of Paleoindian archaeology was published two decades ago. We also highlight several The Great Basin has traditionally not been a focus of biases that have shaped traditional interpretations of Paleoindian research due to its paucity of stratified and early lifeways in the region. well-dated open-air sites, proboscidean kill sites, and demonstrable Clovis-aged occupations. Until recently, the region’s terminal Pleistocene/early Holocene (TP/ 2.