DOCSLIB.ORG

A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: an Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-Life, and Accumulation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: an Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-Life, and Accumulation A Quantitative Analysis of Promontory Cave 1: An Archaeological Study on Population Size, Occupation Span, Artifact Use-life, and Accumulation by Jennifer Hallson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology University of Alberta © Jennifer Hallson, 2017 Abstract Promontory Cave 1 on Great Salt Lake, Utah exhibits an incredible level of preservation rarely seen at archaeological sites. The high proportion of perishable materials provides a unique opportunity to study cultural remains that are usually lost to taphonomic processes. Extensive radiocarbon dating has defined a narrow occupation period of ca. 1250-1290 CE (Ives et al. 2014) and the bounded space of the cave allows for confident estimations of the total number of artifacts present. I have completed quantitative analyses that use several methods to study Cave 1 and its inhabitants, including: artifact density, three-dimensional modeling, proportional calculations, accumulation equations, and statistical equations. Archaeologists know surprisingly little about the rates at which artifacts enter the archaeological record and my analyses examine this factor along with related variables such as use-life and accumulation with the above methods. The above methods also allow for inferences to be made on population size, population composition, and occupation span and frequency. Quantitative analyses of the Promontory Cave 1 assemblage can be linked directly to the exploration of Dene migration southward from Canada, as artifacts found in the cave point towards an identity of Apachean ancestors during their migration south. This research also has the potential for much broader application in archaeological investigations by increasing our awareness of what is usually missing; organic artifacts by far dominated past life but are often forgotten during site analysis. This research shows that consideration of the role of perishable artifacts is important in archaeological studies even when they are not present. ii Preface This thesis is original work by Jennifer Hallson. No part of this thesis has been previously published. iii Dedication For those who came before me and those who are with me now. iv Acknowledgments First and foremost, I owe a huge debt of gratitude to the landowners of Promontory Cave 1 and 2, George and Kumeroa Chournos, for protecting the caves and being two of the best people I’ve ever had the pleasure of knowing. The following funding sources helped to support me during this degree: the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Joseph Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarship-Master’s; the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship-Master’s; SSHRC Insight Grant 435-2012-0140 (Apachean Origins: New Explorations of the Canadian Heritage of A. D. 13th Century Dene at Promontory Point, Utah); the Landrex Distinguished Professorship; the Faculty of Graduate and Research Studies, University of Alberta; and the Department of Anthropology, University of Alberta. Thank you to my grandfather, John Gordon, for ensuring that any leftover education costs were covered. Thank you to my supervisor, Dr. Jack Ives, for fostering my love of archaeology for the past five years, for including me in the Promontory Project (and ruining me for future archaeological sites), and for insights during this research. I also want to thank my defence committee: Dr. Kisha Supernant, Dr. Helen Vallianatos, and Dr. Ruth Gruhn, for providing questions and comments that made my thesis better. Special thank you to Kisha for being a mentor and confidant during this stressful grad school life. Thank you to Brigham Young University, including Dr. Joel Janetski, Katie Richards, Lindsay Johansson, and Jaclyn Eckersley, for housing the Promontory Cave collections, for hosting us, and for providing support. I have been incredibly lucky to be part of the Institute of Prairie Archaeology (a.k.a. The Fortress of Solitude) family: Aileen Reilly, Reid Graham, Courtney Lakevold, Christina Poletto, Andrew Lints, and Todd Kristensen, thank you for the all laughs and good times. Special thank you to Aileen for being a mentor and friend ever since I was a student in her Intro to Archaeology lab, and to Christina for listening to me complain about grad school. I’m also grateful to Robert Gustus for always being willing to help me with various aspects of ArcGIS during this project. A shout out to my Anthro Buds Shaina Humble, Kathryn Murphy, Monique Neilson, Michaela Stang, and Kassy Pointer for providing unwavering support throughout this process, and for their willingness to be guinea pigs for my defence presentation. I am grateful to Michaela for helping me during artifact analysis in Provo, and being my artifact photographer. Thank you to my family for their continuous support, even when they weren’t always quite sure what I actually do as an archaeologist. Special thanks goes to my father for always being my first editor (until the page count got too high). And last but not least, to Scott, thank you for your unconditional support and for always thinking I’m the smartest person you know. v Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................................... ii Preface ..................................................................................................................................................... iii Dedication ............................................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................................. v Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ...................................................................................................................................... viii List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Use of Ethnographic Analogy ........................................................................................................................ 4 Research Questions .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Thesis Overview ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Chapter 2: Background Information .............................................................................................. 9 Promontory Caves: Environment ................................................................................................................ 9 Subsistence .................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Seasonality ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Surrounding Landscape and Cultures ................................................................................................................ 16 Promontory Caves: Excavations ............................................................................................................... 19 Julian Steward’s Excavations.................................................................................................................................. 19 Modern Excavations .................................................................................................................................................. 23 Radiocarbon Dating and Stratigraphy ................................................................................................................ 33 Livable Areas ................................................................................................................................................................. 39 Types of Artifacts ........................................................................................................................................................ 42 A Unique Opportunity ............................................................................................................................................... 43 Connections to Dene Migration ................................................................................................................ 44 Population Studies ........................................................................................................................................ 47 Chapter 3: How, When, and Why Artifacts Enter the Archaeological Record ................ 55 Formation Theory ......................................................................................................................................... 55 Use-Lives of Artifacts .................................................................................................................................... 58 Systemic Number ..........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Internationale Bibliographie Für Speläologie Jahr 1953 1-80 Wissenschaftliche Beihefte Zur Zeitschrift „Die Höhle44 Nr
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Die Höhle - Wissenschaftliche Beihefte zur Zeitschrift Jahr/Year: 1958 Band/Volume: 5_1958 Autor(en)/Author(s): Trimmel Hubert Artikel/Article: Internationale Bibliographie für Speläologie Jahr 1953 1-80 Wissenschaftliche Beihefte zur Zeitschrift „Die Höhle44 Nr. 5 INTERNATIONALE BIBLIOGRAPHIE FÜR SPELÄOLOGIE (KARST- U.' HÖHLENKUNDE) JAHR 1953 VQN HUBERT TRIMMEL Unter teilweiser Mitarbeit zahlreicher Fachleute Wien 1958 Herausgegeben vom Landesverein für Höhlenkunde in Wien und Niederösterreich ■ ■ . ' 1 . Wissenschaftliche Beihefte zur Zeitschrift „Die Höhle44 Nr. 5 INTERNATIONALE BIBLIOGRAPHIE FÜR SPELÄOLOGIE (KARST- U. HÖHLENKUNDE) JAHR 1953 VON HUBERT TRIMMEL Unter teilweiser Mitarbeit zahlreicher Fachleute Wien 1958 Herausgegeben vom Landesverein für Höhlenkunde in Wien und Niederösterreich Gedruckt mit Unterstützung des Notringes der wissenschaftlichen Ve rbände Öste rrei chs Eigentümer, Herausgeber und Verleger: Landesverein für Höhlen­ kunde in Wien und Niederösterreich, Wien II., Obere Donaustr. 99 Vari-typer-Satz: Notring der wissenschaftlichen Verbände Österreichs Wien I., Judenplatz 11 Photomech.Repr.u.Druck: Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen (Landesaufnahme) in Wien - 3 - VORWORT Das Amt für Kultur und Volksbildung der Stadt Wien und der Notring der wissenschaftlichen Verbände haben durch ihre wertvolle Unterstützung auch das Erscheinen dieses vierten Heftes mit bibliographischen
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College Version June 20, 2012
    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version June 20, 2012 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation. The articles use a variety of measurements. Some useful conversions: 1”=2.54
    [Show full text]
  • Man Before History
    CHAPTER 2 MAN BEFORE HISTORY H uman beings have walked the mountains and deserts, the shores and fens of earth for thousands if not millions of years. We have no exact figures concerning the length of human habitation in what is Box Elder County, but we have evidence of human occupa­ tion going back several thousand years. Men, women, and children of whom we have scant record lived and died in the mountains, valleys, caves, and on the riverbanks of the area for generations. Our ignorance of the prehistoric inhabitants of Box Elder, except for the detritus they left, along with their mortal remains and vestiges of their habitations, is almost all-encompassing. We know nothing of their thought, religion, hopes and dreams, and plans. We can under­ stand these cultures, totally removed from our own in time, space, and cosmos, only on their own terms. We can only describe the bits and pieces we find left behind. Archaeologist David Madsen explains that prehistoric societies are usually seen "... in terms of extremes; either as ignorant savages blundering their way through life or as primitive spiritualists living in harmony with nature and the world around them. But the[y] . MAN BEFORE HISTORY 29 were just like every human group; some were cruel and some were benevolent; some were smart and some were a little slow; some worked hard and some were lazy. They were human beings, simply that, trying to raise children in a variable and sometimes harsh land­ scape."1 Part of the gap which separates us from these ancient peoples is their intimate connection with the land, and the variation and diver­ sity of land forms, climate, elevation, vegetation, and all the environ­ mental variables encountered in the cyclical yearly migrations of the ancients.
    [Show full text]
  • Courtney D. Lakevold
    Space and Social Structure in the A.D. 13th Century Occupation of Promontory Cave 1, Utah by Courtney D. Lakevold A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Anthropology University of Alberta © Courtney D. Lakevold, 2017 ABSTRACT Promontory Cave 1, located on the north shore of Great Salt Lake in northern Utah, has yielded many extraordinary archaeological artifacts that are amazingly well-preserved. Promontory phase deposits in Cave 1 are extremely thick, and rich with perishables and other material culture. Bison bones, fur, leather and hide processing artifacts have been recovered at the site, in addition to gaming pieces, basketry, pottery, juniper bark for bedding, knife handles, ceramics and moccasins. A large central hearth area, pictograph panels, pathways and entrance and exit routes have also been identified. Bayesian modeling from AMS dates indicates a high probability that the cave was occupied for one or two human generations over a 20-50 year interval (A.D. 1240-1290). Excavations have taken place at the cave from 2011-2014 by an interdisciplinary research team with members from the University of Alberta (Institute of Prairie Archaeology), the Natural History Museum of Utah (NHMU), Oxford, the Desert Research Institute and Brigham Young University. The extraordinary preservation and narrow time frame (A.D. 1240-1290) for the occupation of Promontory Cave 1 on Great Salt Lake allow for unusual insights into the demography of its Promontory Culture inhabitants. This thesis looks at the cave as a humanly inhabited space and examines what the Promontory Culture group may have looked like in terms of population size and group composition, and how they used or organized space in the cave.
    [Show full text]
  • IDAHO ARCHAEOLOGIST Editor MARK G
    ISSN 0893-2271 1 Volume 43, Number 1 S IDAHO A ARCHAEOLOGIST I Journal of the Idaho Archaeological Society……. 2 THE IDAHO ARCHAEOLOGIST Editor MARK G. PLEW, Department of Anthropology, 1910 University Drive, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-1950; email: [email protected] Editorial Advisory Board KIRK HALFORD, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, ID 83709; email: [email protected] BONNIE PITBLADO, Department of Anthropology, Dale Hall Tower 521A, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019; email: [email protected] ROBERT SAPPINGTON, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, P.O. Box 441110, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-441110; email [email protected] MARK WARNER, Department of Sociology/Anthropology, P.O. Box 441110, University of Idaho, Moscow,ID 83844-441110; email [email protected] PEI-LIN YU, Department of Anthropology,1910 University Drive, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725-1950; email: [email protected] CHARLES SPEER, Department of Anthropology/Idaho Museum of Natural History, 921 S 8th Ave, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83209-8005; email: [email protected] Scope The Idaho Archaeologist publishes peer reviewed articles, reports, and book reviews. Though the journal’s primary focus is the archeology of Idaho, technical and more theoretical papers having relevance to issues in Idaho and surrounding areas will be considered. The Idaho Archaeologist is published semi-annually in cooperation with the College of Arts and Sciences, Boise State University as the journal of the Idaho Archaeological Society. Submissions Articles should be submitted online to the Editor at [email protected]. Upon re- view and acceptance authors are required to electronically submit their manuscripts in Microsoft Word.
    [Show full text]
  • Whittaker-Annotated Atlbib July 31 2014
    1 Annotated Atlatl Bibliography John Whittaker Grinnell College version of August 2, 2014 Introduction I began accumulating this bibliography around 1996, making notes for my own uses. Since I have access to some obscure articles, I thought it might be useful to put this information where others can get at it. Comments in brackets [ ] are my own comments, opinions, and critiques, and not everyone will agree with them. I try in particular to note problems in some of the studies that are often cited by others with less atlatl knowledge, and correct some of the misinformation. The thoroughness of the annotation varies depending on when I read the piece and what my interests were at the time. The many articles from atlatl newsletters describing contests and scores are not included. I try to find news media mentions of atlatls, but many have little useful info. There are a few peripheral items, relating to topics like the dating of the introduction of the bow, archery, primitive hunting, projectile points, and skeletal anatomy. Through the kindness of Lorenz Bruchert and Bill Tate, in 2008 I inherited the articles accumulated for Bruchert’s extensive atlatl bibliography (Bruchert 2000), and have been incorporating those I did not have in mine. Many previously hard to get articles are now available on the web - see for instance postings on the Atlatl Forum at the Paleoplanet webpage http://paleoplanet69529.yuku.com/forums/26/t/WAA-Links-References.html and on the World Atlatl Association pages at http://www.worldatlatl.org/ If I know about it, I will sometimes indicate such an electronic source as well as the original citation, but at heart I am an old-fashioned paper-lover.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don't Know, and How We M
    PALEOAMERICA, 2017 Center for the Study of the First Americans http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20555563.2016.1272395 Texas A&M University REVIEW ARTICLE The Terminal Pleistocene/Early Holocene Record in the Northwestern Great Basin: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and How We May Be Wrong Geoffrey M. Smitha and Pat Barkerb aGreat Basin Paleoindian Research Unit, Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA; bNevada State Museum, Carson City, NV, USA ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The Great Basin has traditionally not featured prominently in discussions of how and when the New Great Basin; Paleoindian World was colonized; however, in recent years work at Oregon’s Paisley Five Mile Point Caves and archaeology; peopling of the other sites has highlighted the region’s importance to ongoing debates about the peopling of the Americas Americas. In this paper, we outline our current understanding of Paleoindian lifeways in the northwestern Great Basin, focusing primarily on developments in the past 20 years. We highlight several potential biases that have shaped traditional interpretations of Paleoindian lifeways and suggest that the foundations of ethnographically-documented behavior were present in the earliest period of human history in the region. 1. Introduction comprehensive review of Paleoindian archaeology was published two decades ago. We also highlight several The Great Basin has traditionally not been a focus of biases that have shaped traditional interpretations of Paleoindian research due to its paucity of stratified and early lifeways in the region. well-dated open-air sites, proboscidean kill sites, and demonstrable Clovis-aged occupations. Until recently, the region’s terminal Pleistocene/early Holocene (TP/ 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Homo Erectus, Became Extinct About 1.7 Million Years Ago
    Bear & Company One Park Street Rochester, Vermont 05767 www.BearandCompanyBooks.com Bear & Company is a division of Inner Traditions International Copyright © 2013 by Frank Joseph All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Joseph, Frank. Before Atlantis : 20 million years of human and pre-human cultures / Frank Joseph. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. Summary: “A comprehensive exploration of Earth’s ancient past, the evolution of humanity, the rise of civilization, and the effects of global catastrophe”—Provided by publisher. print ISBN: 978-1-59143-157-2 ebook ISBN: 978-1-59143-826-7 1. Prehistoric peoples. 2. Civilization, Ancient. 3. Atlantis (Legendary place) I. Title. GN740.J68 2013 930—dc23 2012037131 Chapter 8 is a revised, expanded version of the original article that appeared in The Barnes Review (Washington, D.C., Volume XVII, Number 4, July/August 2011), and chapter 9 is a revised and expanded version of the original article that appeared in The Barnes Review (Washington, D.C., Volume XVII, Number 5, September/October 2011). Both are republished here with permission. To send correspondence to the author of this book, mail a first-class letter to the author c/o Inner Traditions • Bear & Company, One Park Street, Rochester, VT 05767, and we will forward the communication. BEFORE ATLANTIS “Making use of extensive evidence from biology, genetics, geology, archaeology, art history, cultural anthropology, and archaeoastronomy, Frank Joseph offers readers many intriguing alternative ideas about the origin of the human species, the origin of civilization, and the peopling of the Americas.” MICHAEL A.
    [Show full text]
  • Located in the "Sinks"R Or Catchment Basins of the Carson, Walker, Truckee, and Humboldt Rivers (Fig
    PART IV: THE LACUSTRINE SUBSISTENCE PATTERN IN THE DESERT WEST Lewis K. Napton University of California, Berkeley Archaeological investigation of prehistoric occupation sites located in the Great Basin region of the western United States has dis- closed a long and remarkably detailed record of cultural adaptation in surroundings that have been characterized as one of the New World's harshest environments. The ttrestrictive" aspects of the Great Basin environment have been stressed to such an extent that one has the impression that the entire region was a bone-dry desert occupied only by small groups of Indians who managed to eke out a precarious living by subsisting on an occasional antelope, deer, or mountain sheep, the seeds of various plants, or unpalatable foods such as locusts, ants, gophers, snakes and crickets obtained from the desert biome. This '"marginal" sub- sistence adaptation was the economic basis of a lifeway that seems to have been shared by many inhabitants of the Great Basin (Steward 1938), but it is apparent that the desert-adapted existence has considerable time-depth in the region, for archaeological evidence found in sites such as Danger Cave, in western Utah, conforms to the putative Great Basin economic pattern--a ceaseless struggle to survive in an extremely arid habitat that has apparently remained almost unchanged during the last ten thousand years. A rather different impression of life in the Great Basin may be obtained, however, from study of archaeological sites located in the western part of the basin. Sites excavated or investigated during the last half-century in the Humboldt and Carson Sinks in west-central Nevada give evidence of a regional subsistence pattern that was structured primarily on utilization of the resources found in and near the lakes and marshes located in the "sinks"r or catchment basins of the Carson, Walker, Truckee, and Humboldt Rivers (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • DIETARY and PARASITOLOGICAL ANALYSIS of COPROLITES RECOVERED from MUMMY 5, VENTANA CAVE, ARIZONA Karl Reinhard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications Natural Resources, School of 1991 DIETARY AND PARASITOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COPROLITES RECOVERED FROM MUMMY 5, VENTANA CAVE, ARIZONA Karl Reinhard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Richard H. Hevly Northern Arizona University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Environmental Public Health Commons, Other Public Health Commons, and the Parasitology Commons Reinhard, Karl and Hevly, Richard H., "DIETARY AND PARASITOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COPROLITES RECOVERED FROM MUMMY 5, VENTANA CAVE, ARIZONA" (1991). Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications. 27. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natresreinhard/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Karl Reinhard Papers/Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. KIVA, Vol. 56, No.3, 1991 DIETARY AND PARASITOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COPROLITES RECOVERED FROM MUMMY 5, VENT ANA CAVE, ARIZONA KARL J. REINHARD Department of Anthropology 126 Bessey Hall University of Nebraska - Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0368 RICHARD H. HEVL Y Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ 860 II ABSTRACT Four coprolites were excavated with Burial 5 at Ventana Cave. a partially mum­ mified five-year-old child. Two coprolites were granular and dark in color and two were fibrous and light in color. The coprolites are remains of the child's intestinal contents and were submitted for dietary and parasitological analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Harney Area Cultural Resources Class I Inventory
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 1980 Harney area cultural resources class I inventory Ruth McGilvra Bright Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Cultural Resource Management and Policy Analysis Commons, and the Geography Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McGilvra Bright, Ruth, "Harney area cultural resources class I inventory" (1980). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 3264. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.3255 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Ruth McGilvra Bright for the Master of Arts in Anthropology presented August 7, 1980. Title: Harney Area Cultural Resources Class I Inventory. APPROVED BY MEMBERS OF THE THESIS COMMITTEE: Daniel Scheans Gordon ;OoB ~i ,_,,I This document presents the Cultural Resources Overview for the Harney Area in southeastern Oregon. The Harney Area combines three of the four planning units in the Burns Bureau of Land Management District. Most of the land in the Harney Area is located in Harney County, although a few parcels are just outside the county line in Lake and Malheur Counties. Almost all of Harney County is included. There are approximately 3,320,000 acres of Bureau administered public land within the Harney Area, as well as other public and private lands.
    [Show full text]