A Poet's Self-Observation: Robert Browning's Poems in Propria Persona
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
U n iv e r sit y Co l l e g e L o n d o n U n iv e r s it y o f L o n d o n A P o e t ’s S e l f -O b s e r v a t io n : Robert Browning’s Poems i n p r o p r i a p e r s o n a BY B r it t a M a r t e n s A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE SCHOOL OF ENGLISH AND HUMANITIES FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY LONDON 2002 ProQuest Number: U643225 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U643225 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Ab str a c t Robert Browning’s poemsin propria persona are usually considered as giving access to his poetics and private self. The contention of this thesis is that many of these poems do not seriously disclose the poet’s personality but partially subvert the reliability of their speaker. Three hypotheses are posited. Firstly, as in the dramatic monologue, there is a distance between the implied author and the speaker, which allows the reader more critically to observe how the speaker ‘Browning’ conceptualises his self and his world. To analyse this differentiation, the thesis draws on a critical approach which combines Antony Easthope’s distinction ofenounced and enunciation and Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory ofsecond order observation. Secondly, Browning’s self portrayal is shown often to be the opportunity for a critical scrutiny of the way the public perceives him and evaluates poetry in general. The poems thus incite the reader to an observation of his own aesthetic criteria which parallels the poet’s reflections on the poetic medium. Thirdly, discussing poetics within the literary text is seen to be Browning’s contribution to the self-generating autonomy of the modem art system as Luhmann defines it. The poems which undermine the statements of the speaker are related to Romantic Irony, which is a prime indicator of the transition to a modem concept of literature. The thesis undertakes critical readings of those poems in propria persona which focus on Browning’s identity as a poet with an emphasis on the various techniques he employs in presenting himself. Chapters cover his self-definition in relation to the self- expressive poetry of Elizabeth Barrett Browning, poems in which he presents himself as the object of observation by others, poems responding directly to his critics, his self presentation as the narrator in the narrative poems, and his dialectical self-definition in relation to other poets or poetic concepts. The poems emerge as documents of Browning’s hesitant transition towards a modem concept of poetry as independent of extra-literary functions and of the poet’s personality. C o n t e n t s Acknowledgements 5 A Note on Texts 6 Short Titles 7 List of Illustrations 8 I. Introduction 9 1.1. The Notion of Second Order Observation in Systems Theory 10 1.2. The Dramatic Monologue as a Literary Manifestation of Modernity 15 1.3. Romantic Irony as another Indicator of Modernity 17 1.4. Browning’s Poemsin propria persona 18 II. Self-Definition in Relation to Elizabeth Barrett Browning 26 II. 1 .‘The Guardian-Angel’ 29 11.2. ‘Old Pictures in Florence’ 36 H.3. ‘One Word More’ 43 11.4. O lyric Love...’ {The Ring and the Book) 52 11.5. ‘Amphibian’ (Prologue to Fifine at the Fair) 54 11.6. ‘To Edward FitzGerald’ 58 III. Self-Observation as Hetero-Observation 62 III. 1. The Fictionalisation of Personal Experience 62 111.2. Fictional Characters Observing Browning 71 111.3. Browning as Observer 76 IV. The Confrontation with the Critics and the Public 81 IV. 1. The Dialogic Set-Up as Cultural Critique 87 IV.2. The Appropriation of Voice 90 IV.3. The Second Order Observation of the Public, the Art Market and Popular Poetry 95 IV.4. Browning’s Self-Conceptualisation 106 IV.5. Alternatives: Showing instead of Telling in ‘Popularity’ and Romantic Irony in the ‘Prologue’ toFerishtah’s Fancies 114 IV.6. The Use of Prefaces, Prologues and Epilogues 120 V. Browning as Narrator 126 V .l. Sordello 128 V.1.1. Self-Observation through Hetero-Observation: Sordello and Eglamor 135 V. 1.2. Blind Spots in the Narrator’s Observation of His Narration 140 v.l.3. The Observation of the Narrator’s Self in Process 145 V.1.4. The Narrator’s Self-Definition in Relation to the Audience and the Creation of the Active Reader 148 V.l.5. An Autobiographical Episode: The Venice Digression 162 V. 1.6. A First Step towards Functional Differentiation 175 V.2. The Ring and the Book 176 V.2.1. The Poet as First Order Observer of the Story 179 V.2.1.1. The Realist Claim to Historical Accuracy 179 V.2.1.2. The Poet’s Biased Observation of the Story 182 V.2.1.3. Literary Patterns in the Observation of the Story 187 V.2.2. The Second Order Observation of the Poem’s Genesis 191 V.2.2.1. The Ring Metaphor 191 V.2.2.2. The Resuscitation Metaphor 197 V.2.2.3. Oscillations Between Objectivity and Subjectivity 200 V.2.3. General Poetics 203 V.2.3.1. Multiperspectivism and Relativism 204 V.2.3.2. The Intransparency of Language and the Epistemological Function of Art 207 V.2.4. The Third Order Observation: The Stance of the Implied Author 212 V.2.4.1. Which Truth Does Art Tell? 213 V.2.4.2. Romantic Irony 215 V.2.5. The Apex of Browning’s Modernity 218 V.3. Red Cotton Night-Cap Country 219 V.3.1. The Critical Observation of the Narrator’s Realist-Naturalist 222 Method V.3.2. The Epilogue 234 V.4. La Saisiaz 237 V.4.1. Self-Definition in Relation to Literary and Intellectual Predecessors 240 V.4.2. The Epilogue 245 VI. Self-Observation through Juxtaposition With Other Poets 250 VI. 1. Self-Definition as an Objective Poet in Relation to Shelley: ‘Memorabilia’ and ‘Cenciaja’ 252 VI.2. The Confrontation With the Ideal of the Poet as Singer 260 VII. Conclusion; Browning as a Transitional Figure 279 Works Cited 284 A cknowledgements Part of Chapter V.1.4 of this thesis appeared in Notes and Queries, and Chapter V.2 is a revised version of sections from my MA thesis (see Works Cited). I thank Dr. Main Rennie for the permission to quote from her unpublished doctoral dissertation and the Armstrong Browning Library in Waco, Texas, for the permission to reproduce their copy of Guercino’sAngelo Custode. This project would not have been possible without the financial support I received from the University College London Graduate School, the Arts and Humanities Research Board and the German Academic Exchange Service. I wish to thank my enthusiastic supervisor Professor Danny Karlin for many inspiring comments and an endless supply of quotations and cross-references to corroborate my points. I am indebted to Professor Peter Hiihn for kindling my interest in Browning and inspiring the theoretical approach of this thesis. Many thanks also to my subsidiary supervisor Professor Rosemary Ashton for reading my manuscript, to Dr. Scott Lewis for locating two quotations, to John Montgomery and Gustavo Seijo for help with the illustration and to Julia Kiihn for fruitful discussions and her patient proofreading. I am very grateful to my parents for their loving support throughout my studies. Thanks for everything to Jim Shields, to whom this thesis is dedicated with love. A No te on T ex ts Three major critical editions of Browning’s work by Ohio University Press, Oxford University Press and Longman are still in progress. Only the much shorter two-volume Penguin edition covers all of his poetical works, with the exception of the translation of the Agamemnon (1877). This edition is defective both in what it includes among Browning’s unpublished or uncollected poems and in what it omits, e.g. it mistakenly ascribes poems by EBB to Browning and vice versa. In order to be able to trace the chronological development of Browning’s self conceptualisation, I would have liked to use as my primary reference his works as they appear in their first editions. In the absence of a complete critical edition of all first editions and in view of the fact that Browning’s textual revisions of works written after his marriage in 1846 are not as extensive or substantial as those written before, I have adopted the following policy: references to these early works, which underwent considerable revisions, are to the first editions, as collected in the first two volumes of the Longman edition by John Woolford and Daniel Karlin; references to the works from Christmas-Eve and Easter-Day onwards are to the 1888-89 edition, which the other three critical editions use as their copy text. As the number and type of revisions in the later works are relatively insignificant, the final versions of these texts are in general also representative of Browning’s aesthetics at the moment of composition.