2018 Yarmouth S. C. No.__________ Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Between: Jean-Michel Blinn Plaintiff and St. Mary’s Church Parish Council, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Yarmouth, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Halifax Defendant Page 01 – cover page (January 1st 2018, 101 pages 47531 words) Page 02 – intent of litigation Page 03 – notice of action Page 04 – notice of action (cont.) Page 05 – notice of action (cont.) Page 06 – statement of claim Page 07 – letter re: action Page 08 – affidavit of complaint Page 09 – anti-Semitism Page 10 – anti-Semitism (cont.) Page 11-20 – preliminary evidence Page 21 – letter to parishioner Page 22-28 – Dec 8th 2017 case in favour of the demolition Page 29 – Letter of demand Page 30-85 Expository Evidence Page 86 – indictment Page 87 – indictment (cont.) Page 88 – interrogatories Page 89-101 – submissions, facts, relevant case law and arguments 2018 Yarmouth S. C. No.__________ Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Between: Jean-Michel Blinn Plaintiff and St. Mary’s Church Parish Council, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Yarmouth, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Halifax Defendant NOTICE OF INTENT OF LITIGATION To: St. Mary’s Church Parish Council, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Yarmouth The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Halifax Litigation is intended against you The plaintiff intends litigation against you. The included proposed litigation is a class action suit. Order against you is sought for damages An attached draft notice of motion and statement of claim outlines the damages against the plaintiff. Judgment against you if you do not defend The court may grant an order for the relief claimed without further notice, unless you file the notice of defence before the deadline. 4.02 2018 Yarmouth S. C. No.__________ Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Between: Jean-Michel Blinn Plaintiff and St. Mary’s Church Parish Council, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Yarmouth, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Halifax Defendant NOTICE OF ACTION To: St. Mary’s Church Parish Council, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Yarmouth The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Halifax Action has been started against you The plaintiff takes action against you. The plaintiff started the action by filing this notice with the court on the date certified by the prothonotary. The plaintiff claims the relief described in the attached statement of claim. The claim is based on the grounds stated in the statement of claim. Deadline for defending the action To defend the action, you or your counsel must file a notice of defence with the court no more than the following number of days after the day this notice of action is delivered to you: • 15 days if delivery is made in Nova Scotia • 30 days if delivery is made elsewhere in Canada • 45 days if delivery is made anywhere else. Judgment against you if you do not defend The court may grant an order for the relief claimed without further notice, unless you file the notice of defence before the deadline. You may demand notice of steps in the action If you do not have a defence to the claim or you do not choose to defend it you may, if you wish to have further notice, file a demand for notice. If you file a demand for notice, the plaintiff must notify you before obtaining an order for the relief claimed and, unless the court orders otherwise, you will be entitled to notice of each other step in the action. Rule 57 - Action for Damages Under $100,000 Civil Procedure Rule 57 limits pretrial and trial procedures in a defended action so it will be more economical. The Rule applies if the plaintiff states the action is within the Rule. Otherwise, the Rule does not apply, except as a possible basis for costs against the plaintiff. This action is NOT WITHIN Rule 57. Filing and delivering documents Any documents you file with the court must be filed at the office of the prothonotary. 164 Main Street Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, B5A 1C2 Phone: 742-4142 Fax: 742-0678. When you file a document you must immediately deliver a copy of it to each other party entitled to notice, unless the document is part of an ex parte motion, the parties agree delivery is not required, or a judge orders it is not required. Contact information The plaintiff designates the following address: J. M. Blinn & Sons Inc. 2783 HWY 1 Grosses Coques, NS B0W 1M0. Documents delivered to this address are considered received by the plaintiff on delivery. Further contact information is available from the prothonotary. Proposed place of trial The plaintiff proposes that, if you defend this action, the trial will be held at Yarmouth Justice Center, 164 Main Street, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Jean-Michel Blinn J. M. Blinn & Sons Inc. Prothonotary’s certificate I certify that this notice of action, including the attached statement of claim, was filed with the court on _______________,______, 20_____ . ______________________________________ PROTHONOTARY 4.02B Statement of Claim Plaintiff is Jean-Michel Blinn, son of Daniel, son of Homer, Son of Howard, Father of Stephane, Michel and Maria. A proposed class action against the defendant will allow for parishioners who have also been negatively affected to claim damages against the defendant. The Defendant is alleged to be guilty of publishing fraudulent biblical texts, deceiving the plaintiff and causing quantifiable trauma to the parish. The defendant owes money to the plaintiff and to the parishioners for the propagation of purposeful biblical mistranslations, infringing against the Holy Scriptures themselves and creating verifiable theological errors that includes anti-Semitism. The defendant did arbitrarily and knowingly omit and add words in this fraudulent text. This party claims an order providing the following remedies For the claims listed below, financial restitution, the amount to be determined at trial, is sought in the Supreme Court. i. Fraudulent Biblical Text - Contrary to Dt 4:2 and Re 22:18-19, thousands of evidentiary manuscripts verify that indeed the books that are published by the defence are a forgery and are being used, in part, to illicitly generate financial revenue. ii. Enslavement - Contrary to the Rome Statute Article 7 (1)(c)(k), publishing hate propaganda and falsifying information is an egregious form of psychological or intellectual slavery; this is a crime against humanity. iii. Violation of Charter rights – Constitution Act, 1982 (s) 2, this text is based in purposeful inaccuracy and used to violate rights of parishioners. iv. Criminal Code violations – Contrary to CC (s) 296 (1) Blasphemous Libel, Contrary to CC (s) 366 (1) Forgery, contrary to CC (s) 163 (1) (a) Corrupting Morals. Contrary to CC (s) 318 (1) and CC (s) 319 (1) Advocating hate propaganda, contrary to CC (s) 322 (1) Theft. v. Anti-Semitic propaganda – Contrary to New Testament ordinances, this can be exemplified as hate speech. Evidence exists within the fraudulent text and can be quantifiably verified. vi. Theft – Any monies surrendered in exchange for these false texts are to be considered as stolen contrary to the Ten Commandments Ex 20:15, also contrary to various statutes and ordinances. Jean-Michel Blinn J. M. Blinn & Sons Inc. J.M. Blinn & Sons Inc. 2783 HWY 1 Grosses Coques, Digby Co. NS B0W 1M0 January 1st, 2018 Supreme Court of Nova Scotia J. Blinn v St. Mary’s Church Parish Council, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Halifax Yarmouth To the Honourable Justice: RE: January 1st, 2018 Notice of Action I offer my most humble and sincere greetings, Honourable Justice; I am a parishioner and the plaintiff in this matter, Jean-Michel Blinn. I wish to propose that a class action against the defendant be granted to secure the rights to the victims of this concerning infraction contrary to the natural spirit of brotherhood. The act of counterfeiting the Holy Scriptures is a tactic used by the defendant to illicitly gain financial resources and to instigate anti-Semitism. The defence willingly and purposefully corrupted the most sacred of texts, crossing various legal boundaries including charter rights. Evidence, Honourable Sir, is the basis for this matter, as no elaborate theory from the clergymen will shield them from true justice. This matter examines not only the evidence of textual fraud, but the actual damages caused from years of consuming propaganda. Is the subject matter herein suitable for ecclesiastical courts? Most certainly not; although somewhat arguable, criminal and civil wrongs are within the jurisdiction of this Supreme Court. Kindly accept the attached Notice of Action and Statement of Claim as a submission to this just and most honourable court. In truth and honesty, j Jean-Michel Blinn John Michael Blinn J. M. Blinn & Sons Inc. 39.08 2018 Yarmouth S. C. No.__________ Supreme Court of Nova Scotia Between: Jean-Michel Blinn Plaintiff and St. Mary’s Church Parish Council, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Yarmouth, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of Halifax Defendant Affidavit of Complaint I make oath and give evidence as follows: I am Jean-Michel Blinn, son of Daniel, son of Homer, son of Howard. I am the father of Stephane, Michel and Maria. The plaintiff is the corporation responsible for the church that I was born into. I have personal knowledge of the evidence sworn to in this affidavit except where otherwise stated to be based on information and belief. I state, in this affidavit, the source of any information that is not based on my own personal knowledge, and I state my belief of the source. i. I was born Jan 12 1988 and was raised in the parish of Church Point. I attended the Roman Catholic rituals from the time I am able to remember, even being baptized as an infant.