Surface Transportation Board § 1250.2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Surface Transportation Board § 1250.2 Pt. 1250 49 CFR Ch. X (10–1–20 Edition) Code Description Code Description 3532 Mining machinery and equipment, except oil 4022 Textile waste, scrap and sweepings. field machinery and equipment. 4024 Paper waste and scrap. 3533 Oil field machinery and equipment. 4026 Rubber and plastic scrap and waste. 3537 Industrial trucks, tractors, trailers, and stack- 41 MISC. FREIGHT SHIPMENTS. ers. 411 Misc. Freight Shipments. 354 Metalworking Machinery and Equipment. 41111 Outfits or kits. 355 Special Industry Machinery, Except Metal- 41114 Articles, used except for repair, recondi- working Machinery. tioning (41115), returned empty (421), remelting 356 General Industrial Machinery and Equipment. 4021). 357 Office, Computing, and Accounting Machines. 41115 Articles, used, returned for repair, incl. for 358 Service Industry Machines. reconditioning. 359 Miscellaneous Machinery and Parts, Except 412 Miscellaneous Commodities Not Taken in Electrical. Regular Freight Service. 36 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES. 42 CONTAINERS, SHIPPING, RETURNED EMPTY. 361 Electrical Transmission and Distribution Equip- 421 Containers, Shipping, Returned Empty Inc. Car- ment. riers or Devices. 362 Electrical Industrial Apparatus. 363 Household Appliances. 422 Trailers, Semi-Trailers, Returned Empty. 3631 Household cooking equipment, all types. 44 FREIGHT FORWARDER TRAFFIC. 3632 Household refrigerators and home and farm 441 Freight Forwarder Traffic, Carload or Truckload. freezers. 45 SHIPPER ASSOCIATION OR SIMILAR TRAFFIC. 3633 Household laundry equipment. 451 Shipper Association or Similar Traffic, Carload 364 Electric Lighting and Wiring Equipment. or Truckload. 365 Radio and TV Receiving Sets, Except Commu- 46 MISCELLANEOUS MIXED SHIPMENTS EXC. FOR- nication Types. WARDER SEE 44 SHIPPER ASSOCIATION SEE 45. 366 Communication Equipment. 461 All Freight Rate Shipments, N.E.C., Inc. TOFC. 367 Electronic Components and Accessories. 462 Mixed Shipments on One Factor Rates Cnstg. 369 Miscellaneous Electrical Machinery, Equipment, of Commodities Representing Two or More and Supplies. Major Industry Groups Where it is Impossible to 37 TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT. Determine the Predominant Industry. 371 Motor Vehicles and Motor Vehicle Equipment. 47 SMALL PACKAGED FREIGHT SHIPMENTS. 3711 Motor vehicles. 471 Small Packaged Freight Shipments, Including 37111 Passenger cars, assembled. LCL or LTL. 37112 Truck tractors, and trucks, assembled. 37113 Motor coaches, assembled (including trolley busses) and fire department vehicles. [32 FR 20466, Dec. 20, 1967. Redesignated at 46 3712 Passenger car bodies and body parts. FR 9116, Jan. 28, 1981, and 46 FR 10745, Feb. 4, 3713 Truck and bus bodies and body parts. 1981] 3714 Motor vehicle parts and accessories. 3715 Truck trailers. 372 Aircraft and Parts. PART 1250—RAILROAD 373 Ships and Boats. 374 Railroad Equipment. PERFORMANCE DATA REPORTING 375 Motorcycles, Bicycles, and Parts. 379 Miscellaneous Transportation Equipment. Sec. 38 INSTRUMENTS, PHOTOGRAPHIC AND OPTICAL GOODS, 1250.1 General. WATCHES AND CLOCKS. 1250.2 Railroad performance data elements. 381 Engineering, Laboratory, and Scientific Instru- ments. 1250.3 Chicago terminal reporting. 382 Measuring, Controlling, and Indicating Instru- 1250.4 Rail infrastructure projects report- ments. ing. 383 Optical Instruments and Lenses. 384 Surgical, Medical, and Dental Instruments and AUTHORITY: 49 U.S.C. 1321 and 11145. Supplies. SOURCE: 81 FR 87484, Dec. 5, 2016, unless 385 Ophthalmic or Opticians’ Goods. 386 Photographic Equipment and Supplies. otherwise noted. 387 Watches, Clocks, Clockwork Operated Devices, and Parts. § 1250.1 General. 39 MISCELLANEOUS PRODUCTS OF MANUFACTURING. 391 Jewelry, Silverware, and Plated Ware. (a) The reporting period covers: 393 Musical Instruments and Parts. (1) For § 1250.2(a)(1)–(9), 12:01 a.m. Sat- 394 Toys, Amusement, Sporting and Athletic Goods. urday–11:59 p.m. Friday; 3949 Sporting and athletic goods. 395 Pens, Pencils, and Other Office and Artists’ Ma- (2) For § 1250.2(a)(10), the previous cal- terials. endar month; 396 Costume Jewelry, Novelties, Buttons, and No- (3) For § 1250.2(a)(11), 12:01 a.m. Sun- tions. day–11:59 p.m. Saturday; 398 Miscellaneous Manufactured Products—A. 399 Miscellaneous Manufactured Products—B. (4) For § 1250.3(a)(1)–(2), 12:01 a.m. Sat- 40 WASTE AND SCRAP MATERIALS. urday–11:59 p.m. Friday. 401 Ashes. (b) The data required under § 1250.2 402 Waste and Scrap, Except Ashes. 4021 Metal scrap, waste and tailings. and § 1250.3(a) must be reported to the 40211 Iron and steel scrap, wastes and tailings. Board via the method and in the form 214 VerDate Sep<11>2014 10:01 Jun 17, 2021 Jkt 250234 PO 00000 Frm 00224 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\250234.XXX 250234 Surface Transportation Board § 1250.2 prescribed by the Board’s Office of Pub- (iii) Coal unit. lic Assistance, Governmental Affairs, (iv) Automotive unit. and Compliance (OPAGAC) by 5 p.m. (v) Crude oil unit. Eastern Time on Wednesday of each (vi) Ethanol unit. week. In the event that a particular (vii) Manifest. Wednesday is a Federal holiday or falls (viii) System. on a day when STB offices are closed (2) Weekly average terminal dwell for any other reason, then the data time, measured in hours, excluding should be reported on the next business cars on run-through trains (i.e., cars day when the offices are open. that arrive at, and depart from, a ter- (c) Each reporting railroad shall pro- minal on the same through train), for vide an explanation of its methodology the carrier’s system and its 10 largest for deriving the data with its initial fil- terminals in terms of railcars proc- ing and an update if and when that essed. (Terminal dwell is the average methodology changes. This explanation time a car resides at a specified ter- should include the unit train definition minal location expressed in hours.) that the railroad will use in its data re- (3) Weekly average cars on line by porting, which shall reflect its assign- the following car types for the report- ment of train codes in accordance with ing week. (Each railroad shall average its normal business practices. If and its daily on-line inventory of freight when a railroad changes its definition cars. Articulated cars should be count- of unit train it shall notify the Board ed as a single unit. Cars on private of the change at the time it goes into tracks (e.g., at a customer’s facility) effect in the form prescribed by should be counted on the last railroad OPAGAC. on which they were located. Mainte- (d) Unless otherwise provided, the nance-of-way cars and other cars in performance data, Chicago data and railroad service are to be excluded.) alert levels, narrative infrastructure (i) Box. reporting, and any methodologies or (ii) Covered hopper. explanations of data collection re- (iii) Gondola. ported to the Board under this part (iv) Intermodal. will be publicly available and posted on (v) Multilevel (Automotive). the Board’s Web site. (vi) Open hopper. (vii) Tank. § 1250.2 Railroad performance data (viii) Other. elements. (ix) Total. (a) Each Class I railroad must report (4) Weekly average dwell time at ori- the performance data elements in para- gin for the following train types: Grain graphs (a)(1)–(9) and (11) of this section unit, coal unit, automotive unit, crude on a weekly basis, and the data ele- oil unit, ethanol unit, and all other ments in paragraph (a)(10) on a month- unit trains. (For the purposes of this ly basis, for the reporting period, as de- data element, dwell time refers to the fined in § 1250.1(a). However, with re- time period from release of a unit train gard to data elements in paragraph at origin until actual movement by the (a)(7) and (8), Kansas City Southern receiving carrier.) Railway Company is not required to re- (5) The weekly average number of port information by state, but instead trains holding per day sorted by train shall report system-wide data. type (intermodal, grain unit, coal unit, (1) System-average train speed for automotive unit, crude oil unit, eth- the overall system and for the fol- anol unit, other unit, and manifest) lowing train types for the reporting and by cause (crew, locomotive power, week. (Train speed should be measured or other). (Railroads are instructed to for line-haul movements between ter- run a same-time snapshot of trains minals. The average speed for each holding each day, and then to calculate train type should be calculated by di- the average for the reporting period.) viding total train-miles by total hours (6) The weekly average of loaded and operated.) empty cars, operating in normal move- (i) Intermodal. ment and billed to an origin or destina- (ii) Grain unit. tion, which have not moved in 48 hours 215 VerDate Sep<11>2014 10:01 Jun 17, 2021 Jkt 250234 PO 00000 Frm 00225 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\250234.XXX 250234 § 1250.3 49 CFR Ch. X (10–1–20 Edition) or more, sorted by service type (inter- for placement under the railroad’s gov- modal, grain, coal, crude oil, auto- erning tariff. motive, ethanol, fertilizer (the fol- (9) Weekly average coal unit train lowing Standard Transportation Com- loadings or carloadings versus planned modity Codes (STCCs): 2812534, 2818142, loadings for the reporting week by coal 2818146, 2818170, 2818426, 2819173, 2819454, production region. Railroads have the 2819815, 2871235, 2871236, 2871238, 2871244, option to report unit train loadings or 2871313, 2871315, and 2871451), chemicals carloadings, but should be consistent or allied products (all STCC 28 not oth- week over week. erwise reported under ethanol or fer- (10) For Class I carriers operating a tilizer), and all other).In order to de- grain shuttle program, the average rive the averages for the reporting pe- grain shuttle turns per month, for the riod, carriers should run a same-time total system and by region, versus snapshot each day of the reporting pe- planned turns per month, for the total riod, capturing cars that have not system and by region.
Recommended publications
  • Activity-Based Rail Freight Costing a Model for Calculating Transport Costs in Different Production Systems
    Activity-Based Rail Freight Costing A model for calculating transport costs in different production systems GERHARD TROCHE Freight flows Requirements & Desires Train timetable Possibilities & Restrictions Infrastructure Doctoral Thesis in Railway Traffic Planning Stockholm, Sweden 2009 KUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HÖGSKOLAN TRITA-TEC-PHD 09-002 Royal Institute of Technology ISSN 1653-4468 ISBN 13:978-91-85539-35-2 Division for Transportation & Logistics Railway Group Activity-Based Rail Freight Costing A model for calculating transport costs in different production systems Gerhard Troche Doctoral Thesis Stockholm, February 2009 Gerhard Troche © 2009 Gerhard Troche [email protected] Division for Transportation & Logistics - Railway Group - S – 100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden www.infra.kth.se Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US AB, Stockholm 2009 - 2 - Activity-Based Rail Freight Costing - 3 - Gerhard Troche Innehåll Preface 7 Summary 9 1 Introduction 17 1.1 Background 17 1.2 The need for information on railway costs 23 1.3 Goals and purpose 26 1.4 Delimitations 28 2 Literature review 31 2.1 Introductory remarks 31 2.2 General theory of costs and cost calculation 33 2.3 Transport cost models for rail freight 51 3 Methodology 67 3.1 Research approach 67 3.2 Selection of activities and cost items to be depicted 71 3.3 Model validation 75 3.4 Methods of data collection 78 4 Structuring the rail freight system 83 4.1 Products and production systems 83 4.2 Operating principles for freight trains 90 4.3 Changing organizational structures in the railway
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 14 Yards and Terminals1
    CHAPTER 14 YARDS AND TERMINALS1 FOREWORD This chapter deals with the engineering and economic problems of location, design, construction and operation of yards and terminals used in railway service. Such problems are substantially the same whether railway's ownership and use is to be individual or joint. The location and arrangement of the yard or terminal as a whole should permit the most convenient and economical access to it of the tributary lines of railway, and the location, design and capacity of the several facilities or components within said yard or terminal should be such as to handle the tributary traffic expeditiously and economically and to serve the public and customer conveniently. In the design of new yards and terminals, the retention of existing railway routes and facilities may seem desirable from the standpoint of initial expenditure or first cost, but may prove to be extravagant from the standpoint of operating costs and efficiency. A true economic balance should be achieved, keeping in mind possible future trends and changes in traffic criteria, as to volume, intensity, direction and character. Although this chapter contemplates the establishment of entirely new facilities, the recommendations therein will apply equally in the rearrangement, modernization, enlargement or consolidation of existing yards and terminals and related facilities. Part 1, Generalities through Part 4, Specialized Freight Terminals include specific and detailed recommendations relative to the handling of freight, regardless of the type of commodity or merchandise, at the originating, intermediate and destination points. Part 5, Locomotive Facilities and Part 6, Passenger Facilities relate to locomotive and passenger facilities, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Train Transportation of Coal
    Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/unittraintranspo163ferg The Minimum Fee for NOTICE: Return or renew all Library Materials! each Lost Book is $50.00. JIJN 9 7 IQflQ The person charging this material Is re^Wisible for it was withdrawn its return to the library from which on or before the Latest Date stamped below. ins for discipli- Theft, mu lersity. nary actiof^rijl , To renew can TeiepHonS Center, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY L161—O-1096 C>)A.<.cyJ^ CklfS! JbKARY >' OF ILLINOIS 4AJLUNC UNIT TRAIN TRANSPORTATION OF COAL BY JOHN ALAN FERGUSON S., Eastern Illinois University, 1970 M.S., Eastern Illinois University. 1971 THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1975 Urbana, Illinois The person charging this material is re- sponsible for its return to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. To renew call Telephone Center, 333-8400 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN I l I I & uZtx tLkM m i° w» it* flee : L161—O-1096 . Appendix E CAC Document No. 163 Final Report * The Coal Future: Economic and Technological Analysis of Initiatives and Innovations to Secure Fuel Supply Independence by Michael Rieber Center for Advanced Computation University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Shao Lee Soo James Stukel College of Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Advisor Jack Simon, Chief Illinois State Geological Survey Center for Advanced Computation University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois 61801 May 1975 This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (RANN) , NSF Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Crude Oil by Rail
    Moving Crude Oil by Rail Association of American Railroads July 2014 Summary U.S. crude oil production has risen sharply in recent years, with much of the increased output moving by rail. In 2008, U.S. Class I railroads originated 9,500 carloads of crude oil. In 2013, they originated 407,761 carloads. In light of these increased volumes, railroads have taken numerous steps to enhance crude oil safety. They’ve undertaken top-to-bottom reviews of their operations and voluntarily updated their operating practices, from the selection of routes, to train speeds, to track and equipment inspections. Railroads already provide training to more than 20,000 emergency responders each year, but they are increasing their efforts to train first responders and are creating inven- tories of emergency response resources along their lines. And in addition to reviewing their own operations to make them safer, railroads are urging federal regulators to toughen existing standards for new tank cars and require that existing tank cars used to transport crude oil be retrofitted with safety-enhancing technologies or, if not upgraded, aggressively phased out. Additional pipelines will probably be built in the years ahead, but the competitive advantages railroads offer will keep them in the crude oil transportation market long into the future. The Shale Revolution Has Led to Sharply Higher Crude Oil Production Throughout the world, huge quantities of crude oil and natural gas are trapped in non- permeable shale rock. Over the past few years, technological advances — especially in hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) and horizontal drilling — along with higher crude oil prices have made recovery of much of this oil and gas economically feasible.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Rail Transport Operations and Units
    FM 55-20 FIELD MANUAL m s ^ ; )cJ' M. il ARMY RAIL TRANSPORT OPERATIONS AND UNITS RETURN TO ARMY LIBRARY ROOM 1 A 518 PENTAGON HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE A\R M Y JUNE 1974 1 r il *FM 55-20 FIELD MâNUAL HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 55-20 ! WASHINGTON, D. C., H June 197b ARMY RAIL TRANSPORT OPERATIONS AND UNITS Paragraph Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1—1-7 1-1 2. TRANSPORTATION RAILWAY UNITS Section I. General 2-1—2-3 2-1 II. Supervisory and Command Units 2-4—2-6 2-2 III. Maintenance and Operating Units 2-7—2-11 2-9 IV. Transportation Railway Service Teads 2-12, 2-13 2-18 t* A CHAPTER 3. RAILWAY OPERATIONS - 3-1—3-14 3-1 4. OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS IN A THEATER OF OPERATIONS 4-1—4-6 4-1 f » A 5. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER AGENCIES . 5-1—5-5 5-1 6. RAILWAY MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLY _. 6-1—6-4 6-1 7. RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION 7-1—7-11 7-1 8. RAILWAY ENGINEERING DATA 8-1—8-4 8-1 9. RAILWAY COMMUNICATIONS DATA 9-1—9-5 9-1 10. RAILWAY AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM ; 10-1, 10-2 10-1 11. RAILWAY SECURITY 11-1—11-7 11-7 12. PLANNING Section I. General - 12-1, 12-2 12-1 II. Railway Line Capacity Planning 12-3—12-15 12-1 III. Railway Yard Capacity Determination 12-16—12-19 12-4 IV. Railway Equipment Requirements 12-20—12-23 12-6 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Train Tariff Evwr 5000
    FT EVWR 5000 EVANSVILLE WESTERN RAILWAY, INC. UNIT TRAIN TARIFF EVWR 5000 NAMING RULES AND CHARGES ON UNIT TRAIN SHIPMENTS OF COMMODITIES OTHER THAN BITUMINOUS COAL; OR COKE, THE DIRECT PRODUCT OF COAL; OR COKE, PETROLEUM FROM TO Stations on the Evansville Western Railroad, Interchange point on the Evansville Western Inc. Railroad, Inc. Interchange point on the Evansville Western Stations on the Evansville Western Railroad, Railroad, Inc. Inc. ISSUED: September 11, 2008 EFFECTIVE: October 1, 2008 ISSUED BY Larry Davis VP Marketing & Sales 1500 Kentucky Ave. Paducah, KY 42003 FT EVWR 5000 TABLE OF CONTENTS RULES AND OTHER GOVERNING PROVISIONS GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS ITEM SUBJECT ITEM 10 1 - Application of Tariff STATION LISTS AND CONDITIONS 10 - Station List and Conditions 20 - Reference to Tariffs or Items, etc. This tariff is governed by the Official Railroad Station List, 40 - Consecutive Numbers OPSL 6000-series, Railinc, Agent, to the extent shown 45 - Capacities and Dimensions of CARS below: 75 - Method of Canceling 105 - Intrastate Application PREPAY REQUIREMENTS AND STATION CONDITIONS 125 - Definition of Ton 130 - Limitations on Unit Train Service (a) For additions and abandonments of stations, and except 135 - Unit Train Switching as otherwise shown herein, for prepay requirements, 140 - Intraterminal and Intraplant Switching changes in names of stations, restrictions as to 145 - Cars furnished by Consignor or Consignee acceptance or delivery of freight and changes in station 155 - Empty movement facilities. 170 - Demurrage Rules and Charges 180 - Cancellation of Empty Unit Trains When a station is abandoned as of a date specified in 190 - Locomotive Repositioning the above named tariff, the rates from and to such 200 - Weighing station as published in this tariff are inapplicable on and 230 - Switching charges on loaded cars held for after that date.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Freight Trains
    Introduction to North American Rail Transportation Christopher Barkan Professor & Executive Director Rail Transportation & Engineering Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign © 2014 Chris Barkan All Rights Reserved Presentation Outline • Importance of freight transportation systems and role of rail • Introduction to US freight railroads • Railroad freight transportation metrics • Importance of economies of scale to rail transport efficiency • US freight traffic, cars and trains • Railroad intermodal traffic: types and growth • Summary and concluding remarks © 2014 Chris Barkan All Rights Reserved REES-1 Introduction to Freight Rail Transport 2 Q: What country has the best rail transportation system in the world? A: It depends! Passenger or freight? Passenger: Probably Japan or one of the western European countries Freight: U.S. and Canada are virtually undisputed leaders © 2014 Chris Barkan All Rights Reserved REES-1 Introduction to Freight Rail Transport 3 Elements of Railway Engineering © 2014 Chris Barkan All Rights Reserved REES-1 Introduction to Freight Rail Transport 4 US Freight and Passenger Railroad Networks and Traffic FREIGHT PASSENGER • US has an extensive freight railroad network with heavy traffic on many routes • Outside Northeast and a few other corridors, most passenger routes have only one train per day © 2014 Chris Barkan All Rights Reserved REES-1 Introduction to Freight Rail Transport 5 Why is railroad freight transport so important now, and even more so in the future? • Consider the pros and cons of each
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Railroad Energy Efficiency in the United States (MPC-13-250)
    MPC Report No. 13-250 Analysis of Railroad Energy Efficiency in the United States Denver Tolliver Pan Lu Douglas Benson Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota State University Fargo, North Dakota May 2013 Disclaimer The contents of this report reflect the work of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Mountain-Plains Consortium in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. North Dakota State University does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, disability, gender expression/identity, genetic information, marital status, national origin, public assistance status, sex, sexual orientation, status as a U.S. veteran., race or religion. Direct inquiries to the Vice President for Equity, Diversity and Global Outreach, 205 Old Main, (701) 231-7708. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2. BRIEF REVIEW OF RAILWAY ENERGY STUDIES .................................................................................. 3 3. ANALYTICAL MODELS OF RAILROAD FUEL CONSUMPTION .......................................................... 5 3.1 Resistance Forces and Equations .............................................................................................................. 5 3.2 Estimating Procedures ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Sessions
    T ECHNICAL S ESSIONS Sunday, 8:00am - 9:30am How to Navigate the Technical Sessions ■ SA01 There are three primary resources to help you C-Room 21, Upper Level understand and navigate the Technical Sessions: Panel Discussion: The Society of Decision • This Technical Session listing, which provides the Professionals - Building a True Profession most detailed information. The listing is presented Sponsor: Decision Analysis chronologically by day/time, showing each session Sponsored Session and the papers/abstracts/authors within each Chair: Carl Spetzler, Chairman & CEO, Strategic Decisions Group (SDG), 745 Emerson St, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, United States of session. America, [email protected] • The Session Chair, Author, and Session indices 1 - The Society of Decision Professionals - Building a provide cross-reference assistance (pages 426-463). True Profession Moderator: Carl Spetzler, Chairman & CEO, Strategic Decisions • The Track Schedule is on pages 46-53. This is an Group (SDG), 745 Emerson St, Palo Alto, CA, 94301, United overview of the tracks (general topic areas) and States of America, [email protected], Panelist: Larry Neal, when/where they are scheduled. David Leonhardi, Hannah Winter, Jack Kloeber, Andrea Dickens When we take stock of 40 years of Decision Analysis practice. Decision professionals still assist in only a small fraction of important and difficult choices. In this panel, practitioners will explore why this is the case and discuss how to Quickest Way to Find Your Own Session form a true profession to transform the way important and difficult decisions are Use the Author Index (pages 430-453) — the session made. code for your presentation(s) will be shown along with the track number.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Crude Oil by Rail
    Moving Crude Oil by Rail Association of American Railroads December 2013 Summary Technological advances, along with relatively high crude oil prices, have led to sharply higher U.S. crude oil production. Historically, most crude oil has moved from production areas to refineries by pipeline. However, much of the recent increases in crude oil output has moved by rail. In 2008, U.S. Class I railroads originated just 9,500 carloads of crude oil. In 2012, they originated nearly 234,000 carloads and will likely originate around 400,000 carloads in 2013. Railroads have an excellent safety record regarding crude oil transportation — better, in fact, than pipelines in recent years. Based on U.S. DOT data, the crude oil “spill rate” for railroads from 2002-2012 was an estimated 2.2 gallons per million ton-miles, compared with an estimated 6.3 for pipelines. Railroads are continuously striving to further improve the safety of moving crude oil by rail. For example, the rail industry recently urged federal regulators to toughen existing standards for new tank cars and require that the approximately 92,000 existing tank cars used to transport flammable liquids, including crude oil, be retrofitted with advanced safety-enhancing technologies or, if not upgraded, phased out. Beyond providing transportation capacity, railroads offer energy market participants the ability to shift deliveries quickly to different markets, enabling producers to sell their product to the market offering the best price. Additional pipelines will probably be built in the years ahead, but the competitive advantages railroads offer will keep them in the crude oil transportation market long into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance of a Freight Train to Forward Motion
    Resistance of a Freight Train to Forward Motion METREK Division of The MITRE Corporation,-7 6 6MTR 4 21-Freight Operations m j m m T r m m k m s m m m & mmasns^vs MWARY MITRE Technical Report ; V . 7664 Resistance of a Freight Train to Forward Motion John D. Muhlenberg November 1977 Contract Sponsor: D O T / F R A Contract No.: DOT-FR-54090 Project No.: 274A Dept.: W-23 This document was prepared for authorized distribution. It has not been approved for public release. METREK Division of The MITRE Corporation 1820 Dolley Madison Blvd. McLean, Virginia 22101 MITRE Department and Project Approval^ i i ABSTRACT This interim report documents the results of the initial portion of an intensive investigation of the train resistance phenomenon. The history and development of prior investigations are discussed and the formulas for train resistance developed by investigators in the U.S. and abroad are analyzed with respect to their present applicability to the phenomenon. Factors contributing to the considerable discrepancies among various formulas are discussed. A methodology suitable for a quick and accurate solution of the hitherto ignored problem of the air resistance of different arrangements of the same consist is developed and utilized in determining train resistance. Preliminary estimates of reductions in train resistance and consequent fuel and cost savings resulting from possible modifications to train and track technology are given. Recommendations are made for further investiga­ tions during the remainder of this study and possible fruitful areas for new research. Two appendices explain the rationale behind the calculation of air resistance of various consist arrangements and discuss the related computer program in detail.
    [Show full text]
  • US Rail Transportation of Crude
    U.S. Rail Transportation of Crude Oil: Background and Issues for Congress John Frittelli Specialist in Transportation Policy Anthony Andrews Specialist in Energy Policy Paul W. Parfomak Specialist in Energy and Infrastructure Policy Robert Pirog Specialist in Energy Economics Jonathan L. Ramseur Specialist in Environmental Policy Michael Ratner Specialist in Energy Policy December 4, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R43390 U.S. Rail Transportation of Crude Oil: Background and Issues for Congress Summary North America is experiencing a boom in crude oil supply, primarily due to growing production in the Canadian oil sands and the recent expansion of shale oil production from the Bakken fields in North Dakota and Montana as well as the Eagle Ford and Permian Basins in Texas. Taken together, these new supplies are fundamentally changing the U.S. oil supply-demand balance. The United States now meets 66% of its crude oil demand from production in North America, displacing imports from overseas and positioning the United States to have excess oil and refined products supplies in some regions. The rapid expansion of North American oil production has led to significant challenges in transporting crudes efficiently and safely to domestic markets—principally refineries—using the nation’s legacy pipeline infrastructure. In the face of continued uncertainty about the prospects for additional pipeline capacity, and as a quicker, more flexible alternative to new pipeline projects, North American crude oil producers are increasingly turning to rail as a means of transporting crude supplies to U.S. markets. Railroads are more willing to enter into shorter-term contracts with shippers than pipelines, offering more flexibility in a volatile oil market.
    [Show full text]